The Geochemistry of Selenium and Sulfur in a Coastal Salt Marsh

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Geochemistry of Selenium and Sulfur in a Coastal Salt Marsh Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons OES Theses and Dissertations Ocean & Earth Sciences Summer 1987 The Geochemistry of Selenium and Sulfur in a Coastal Salt Marsh David Jay Velinsky Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/oeas_etds Part of the Biogeochemistry Commons, and the Oceanography Commons Recommended Citation Velinsky, David J.. "The Geochemistry of Selenium and Sulfur in a Coastal Salt Marsh" (1987). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Dissertation, Ocean & Earth Sciences, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/z5cp- zc86 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/oeas_etds/157 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Ocean & Earth Sciences at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in OES Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE GEOCHEMISTRY OF SELENIUM AND SULFUR IN A COASTAL SALT MARSH by David Jay Velinsky B.S. June 1977, Florida Institute of Technology A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY OCEANOGRAPHY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY AUGUST, 1987 Approved by: Dr ;ter (Director) Dr.L • David* A U V/J. • ADu^cdige - » U W C l J. g j Dr ^ ----- " Dr. Wiliam M. Dunstan Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Copyright by David Jay Velinsky 1987 All Rights Reserved Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. This dissertation is dedicated in memory of my father Irving H. Velinsky ii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere appreciation to Dr. Gregory A. Cutter, for his financial support, guidance, inspiration and "kicks in the butt" throughout this study. Greg was a real life saver when the chips were down. The expertise, critical suggestions and support provided by my thesis committee, Dr. David Burdige, Dr. Thomas Church, Dr. William Dunstan, and Dr. George Wong were invaluable. A special thanks goes to Dr. Terry Wade whose initial support and guidance provided me with a goal that I have finally reached. I would like to thank Dr. Tom Church for use of his facilities at University of Delaware and Joseph Scudlark for sweating it out in the field, laboratory and at the Rose 'n Crown. Joe sacrificed many hours for this study and it surely benefited from his help. Thanks to Dr. George Luther III for providing me with various ancillary data needed for this research. Chris Krahforst and Jeff Busa provided valuable field assistance and Bob Kluckhohn for his greigite analyses. I am grateful to Dr. David Burdige for his assistance in helping me with data interpretation, diagenetic modeling, ancillary information and writing the "great" paper of 1983. I would like to thank Lynda A. Cutter for her help in the laboratory and proofreading various parts of this dissertation. iii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Over the past 7 long years, I have benefited from my association with many students at ODU. Through all the ups and downs they have all provided support and encouragement that made my stay at ODU bearable and most often fun. I am especially indebted to Tom Oatts for his laboratory help and friendship while at ODU. I would also like to thank my other colleagues in the initial Chemical Oceanography Group, Jim Todd, Kazufumi Takayanagi, Charlie Farmer and Robb Brown for their laboratory and field assistance in the various projects I undertook. Their intellectual stimulation and friendship made chemical oceanography interesting and exciting. To Mario Paula, Kimberley G. Davis, E.A. Stern, Chris Krahforst, Darrin Mann, and many others for help along the way. Marcia Berman provided unimaginable physical and mental feats that, even today, cannot and should not be fully described. A special thanks to Maria Lourdes Casino San Diego McGlone whose help, moral support and friendship will undoubtedly last a lifetime. My surfing buddies, Dave Timpy, Rusty Butt and Alan Friedlander helped in keeping my sanity and priorities straight at times of frustration and self destruction. Thanks to Ken, Sarah and Jason Petroske for making my life a little nicer and providing me a home while in Norfolk. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Finally, I a special thanks to my mother whose support, both moral and financial, was deeply appreciated. "If only you were a real doctor!". I am grateful to the Department of Oceanography, ODU for various financial support throughout my graduate career. v Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page DEDICATION................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................ iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................... vi LIST OF TABLES .......................................... ix LIST OF FIGURES ......................................... xi CHAPTER 1: GENERAL INTRODUCTION ...................... 1 Scientific Background........................ 9 Chemistry of Selenium in the Environment. 9 Selenium in Oceanic Waters ............... 13 Selenium in Geologic Material ............. 16 Study Area .................................... 30 CHAPTER 2: THE DETERMINATION OF SELENIUM AND SULFUR SPECIATION IN MARINE SEDIMENTS ........... 35 Introduction ................................. 35 Sampling Methods ............................. 35 Water Sample Analyses... ..................... 37 Experimental ............................... 37 Discussion ................................. 45 Sediment Analyses ........................... 47 Experimental ............................... 47 Discussion ................................. 60 CHAPTER 3: SULFUR GEOCHEMISTRY IN THE GREAT MARSH .. 74 Introduction ................................. 74 vi Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) PAGE Results and Discussion ...................... 77 Total carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur ...... 77 Iron Monosulfides ......................... 81 Greigite ................................... 85 Elemental Sulfur .......................... 87 Pyrite ...................................... 88 A Quantitative Assessment of Pyritization 95 Conclusions .................................. 100 CHAPTER 4: SELENIUM GEOCHEMISTRY IN THE GREAT MARSH. 102 Introduction ................................. 102 Results and Discussions .................... 102 Dissolved Selenium in Pore and Creek Waters ...................................... 109 Chemical Forms of Sediemntary Selenium .. 114 Input of Selenium to the Marsh .......... 130 Internal Cycling of Selenium in Marsh Sediments .................................. 136 Export of Selenium from the Marsh ....... 139 Summary and Conclusions .................... 156 CHAPTER 5: COMPARATIVE GEOCCHEMISTRIES OF SELENIUM AND SULFUR ................................. 159 Introduction ................................. 159 Discussion ................................... 159 Compartive Chemistries of Selenium and Sulfur ..................................... 159 vii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) PAGE Geochemical Behavior of Selenium and Sulfur in Marine Sediments ............... 167 Conclusions ................................... 174 CHAPTER 6: SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS .................. 177 REFERENCES .............................................. 181 viii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1.1 Free energy change for some bacterial reactions......................................... 4 1.2a Selected physical properties for selenium and sulfur compounds................................. 10 1.2b Reduction potentials for some analogous selenium and sulfur compoundss................. 11 1.3 Solubility products of some metal selenides... 14 1.4 Concentrations of selenium in selected rock types............................................. 18 1.5 Various selenium minerals....................... 20 1.6 Selenium concentrations in minerals of diagenetic origins............................... 22 2.1 List of parameters measured for this study.... 38 2.2 Recovery of elemental selenium using sodium sulfite........................................... 63 2.3 Recovery of elemental selenium from marsh sediment using a sodium sulfite leach and nitric-perchloric digest........................ 65 2.4 Sodium sulfite leach results of marsh sediment at pH 7 and 9 .................................... 67 2.5 Carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur recoveries after sodium sulfite leach............................ 69 3.1 Concentrations of sedimentary sulfur species, organic carbon, total nitrogen, total sulfur, and iron oxides from the Great Marsh.......... 78 4.1 Seasonal marsh redox cycle...................... 104 4.2 Pore water ancillary data in the Great Marsh.. 106 4.3 Pore water selenium data in the Great Marsh... 110 4.4 Creek water total dissolved selenium data 113 ix Reproduced with permission of the copyright
Recommended publications
  • Washington State Minerals Checklist
    Division of Geology and Earth Resources MS 47007; Olympia, WA 98504-7007 Washington State 360-902-1450; 360-902-1785 fax E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.dnr.wa.gov/geology Minerals Checklist Note: Mineral names in parentheses are the preferred species names. Compiled by Raymond Lasmanis o Acanthite o Arsenopalladinite o Bustamite o Clinohumite o Enstatite o Harmotome o Actinolite o Arsenopyrite o Bytownite o Clinoptilolite o Epidesmine (Stilbite) o Hastingsite o Adularia o Arsenosulvanite (Plagioclase) o Clinozoisite o Epidote o Hausmannite (Orthoclase) o Arsenpolybasite o Cairngorm (Quartz) o Cobaltite o Epistilbite o Hedenbergite o Aegirine o Astrophyllite o Calamine o Cochromite o Epsomite o Hedleyite o Aenigmatite o Atacamite (Hemimorphite) o Coffinite o Erionite o Hematite o Aeschynite o Atokite o Calaverite o Columbite o Erythrite o Hemimorphite o Agardite-Y o Augite o Calciohilairite (Ferrocolumbite) o Euchroite o Hercynite o Agate (Quartz) o Aurostibite o Calcite, see also o Conichalcite o Euxenite o Hessite o Aguilarite o Austinite Manganocalcite o Connellite o Euxenite-Y o Heulandite o Aktashite o Onyx o Copiapite o o Autunite o Fairchildite Hexahydrite o Alabandite o Caledonite o Copper o o Awaruite o Famatinite Hibschite o Albite o Cancrinite o Copper-zinc o o Axinite group o Fayalite Hillebrandite o Algodonite o Carnelian (Quartz) o Coquandite o o Azurite o Feldspar group Hisingerite o Allanite o Cassiterite o Cordierite o o Barite o Ferberite Hongshiite o Allanite-Ce o Catapleiite o Corrensite o o Bastnäsite
    [Show full text]
  • Sulfur Safety Data Sheet SDS No: 6192 According to Federal Register / Vol
    Sulfur Safety Data Sheet SDS No: 6192 According To Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2012 / Rules And Regulations Revision Date: 10/23/2018 Date of Issue: 08/30/2012 Version: 1.0 SECTION 1: IDENTIFICATION 1.1. Product Identifier Product Form: Mixture Product Name: Sulfur Synonyms: Brimstone, Sulfur 1.2. Intended Use of the Product Hydrogen sulfide may be present in trace quantities (by weight) in molten sulfur but may accumulate to toxic or flammable concentrations in enclosed spaces such as molten sulfur storage pits, tanks, or tanker/railcar headspaces. Hydrogen sulfide is not considered a hazard associated with solid sulfur. 1.3. Name, Address, and Telephone of the Responsible Party Customer Hess Tower 1501 McKinney Houston, TX 77010 T:(713) 496-4000 When calling the main operator ask for the EHS Safety Department. All Hess SDSs are also available via the Hess.com website. 1.4. Emergency Telephone Number Emergency Number : (800) 424-9300 CHEMTREC (24 hours) SECTION 2: HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION 2.1. Classification of the Substance or Mixture GHS-US Classification Flam. Sol. 2 H228 Skin Irrit. 2 H315 Aquatic Acute 2 H401 Comb. Dust Full text of hazard classes and H-statements : see Section 16. 2.2. Label Elements GHS-US Labeling Hazard Pictograms (GHS-US) : GHS02 GHS07 Signal Word (GHS-US) : Warning Hazard Statements (GHS-US) : May form combustible dust concentrations in air. H228 - Flammable solid. H315 - Causes skin irritation. H401 - Toxic to aquatic life. Precautionary Statements (GHS-US) : P210 - Keep away from heat, sparks, open flames, hot surfaces. - No smoking. P240 - Ground/Bond container and receiving equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Cycling of Sulfur and Mercury in the St. Louis River Watershed, Northeastern Minnesota
    Page 1 of 91 Final Report On the Cycling of Sulfur and Mercury in the St. Louis River Watershed, Northeastern Minnesota An Environmental and Natural Trust Fund Final Report August 15, 2012 Michael Berndt and Travis Bavin Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 500 Lafayette Rd. St. Paul, MN 55455 Page 2 of 91 Final Report Contents Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Methods ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Sampling Site Selection ................................................................................................................ 5 Chemical Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 6 34 18 Sulfur and Oxygen Isotopes in Dissolved Sulfate (δ SSO4 and δ OSO4)........................................ 7 Stream Gaging .............................................................................................................................. 7 Results .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Watershed Survey .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sodium Chlorite Sulfur Destruction
    ® Basic Chemicals Sodium Chlorite Sulfur Destruction Application Description: Advantages of Sodium Chlorite/Chlorine Reduced sulfur compounds are a broad Dioxide: class of oxy-sulfur compounds, such as = = sulfite (SO3 ) and thiosulfate (S2O3 ), that Chlorine dioxide reacts the most rapidly have an oxidant demand. These and does not form chlorinated organic compounds are found in the waste streams by-products. of the petroleum, steel, paper and most While chlorine is the least expensive chemical industries. Their high oxidant chemical, it cannot be used when demand can cause eutrophication of natural organic compounds are present due to waters and excessive chlorine demand in the formation of chlorinated organic by- wastewaters treated by POTWs (Publicly products. Owned Treatment Works). When chlorine can't be used, hydrogen peroxide has the lowest chemical costs. Chlorine dioxide effectively oxidizes these species to sulfate ions over a broad pH range (5-9). Below a pH of 4, sodium Affected Industries: chlorite may be used without the generation Chemicals, Food, Iron & Steel, Mining, Oil of chlorine dioxide. Since these compounds Refining, Plastics & Rubber, Pulp & Paper, are usually found in mixtures of various Textiles ratios the required chlorine dioxide dosage must be determined for each application. Further Information More detailed information on sodium Alternatives: chlorite applications is available upon Hydrogen peroxide solution is added by request through the OxyChem Technical a chemical dosing pump. Services Department. Call or write to: Chlorine gas is added by a vacuum eductor system, while sodium OxyChem hypochlorite solution is added by a Technical Service Department chemical dosing pump. PO Box 12283 Wichita, Kansas 67277-2283 800-733-1165 Ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Minerals Named After Scientists
    Dr. John Andraos, http://www.careerchem.com/NAMED/Minerals.pdf 1 MINERALS NAMED AFTER PEOPLE AND PLACES © Dr. John Andraos, 2003-2011 Department of Chemistry, York University 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ONTARIO M3J 1P3, CANADA For suggestions, corrections, additional information, and comments please send e-mails to [email protected] http://www.chem.yorku.ca/NAMED/ PEOPLE MINERAL PERSON OR PLACE DESCRIPTION Abelsonite ABELSON, Philip Hauge (1913 - ?) geochemist Abenakiite ABENAKI people, Quebec, Canada Abernathyite ABERNATHY, Jess Mine operator American, b. ? Abswurmbachite ABS-WURMBACH, IRMGARD (1938 - ) mineralogist German, b. ? Adamite ADAM, Gilbert Joseph Zn3(AsO3)2 H2O (1795 - 1881) mineralogist French, b. ? Aegirine AEGIR, Scandinavian god of the sea Afwillite WILLIAMS, Alpheus Fuller (1874 - ?) mine operator DeBeers Consolidated Mines, Kimberley, South Africa Agrellite AGRELL, Stuart O. (? - 1996) mineralogist British, b. ? Agrinierite AGRINIER, Henri (1928 - 1971) mineralogist French, b. ? Aguilarite AGUILAR, P. Superintendent of San Carlos mine, Guanajuato, Mexico Mexican, b. ? Aikenite 2 PbS Cu2S Bi2S5 Andersonite ANDERSON, Dr. John Andraos, http://www.careerchem.com/NAMED/Minerals.pdf 2 Andradite ANDRADA e Silva, Jose B. Ca3Fe2(SiO4)3 de (? - 1838) geologist Brazilian, b. ? Arfvedsonite ARFVEDSON, Johann August (1792 - 1841) Swedish, b. Skagerholms- Bruk, Skaraborgs-Län, Sweden Arrhenite ARRHENIUS, Svante Silico-tantalate of Y, Ce, Zr, (1859 - 1927) Al, Fe, Ca, Be Swedish, b. Wijk, near Uppsala, Sweden Avogardrite AVOGADRO, Lorenzo KBF4, CsBF4 Romano Amedeo Carlo (1776 - 1856) Italian, b. Turin, Italy Babingtonite (Ca, Fe, Mn)SiO3 Fe2(SiO3)3 Becquerelite BECQUEREL, Antoine 4 UO3 7 H2O Henri César (1852 - 1908) French b. Paris, France Berzelianite BERZELIUS, Jöns Jakob Cu2Se (1779 - 1848) Swedish, b.
    [Show full text]
  • Revision 2 of Ms. 5419 Page 1 Time's Arrow in the Trees of Life And
    Revision 2 of Ms. 5419 Time’s Arrow in the Trees of Life and Minerals Peter J. Heaney1,* 1Dept. of Geosciences, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802 *To whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected] Page 1 Revision 2 of Ms. 5419 1 ABSTRACT 2 Charles Darwin analogized the diversification of species to a Tree of Life. 3 This metaphor aligns precisely with the taxonomic system that Linnaeus developed 4 a century earlier to classify living species, because an underlying mechanism – 5 natural selection – has driven the evolution of new organisms over vast timescales. 6 On the other hand, the efforts of Linnaeus to extend his “universal” organizing 7 system to minerals has been regarded as an epistemological misfire that was 8 properly abandoned by the late nineteenth century. 9 The mineral taxonomies proposed in the wake of Linnaeus can be 10 distinguished by their focus on external character (Werner), crystallography (Haüy), 11 or chemistry (Berzelius). This article appraises the competition among these 12 systems and posits that the chemistry-based Berzelian taxonomy, as embedded 13 within the widely adopted system of James Dwight Dana, ultimately triumphed 14 because it reflects Earth’s episodic but persistent progression with respect to 15 chemical differentiation. In this context, Hazen et al.’s (2008) pioneering work in 16 mineral evolution reveals that even the temporal character of the phylogenetic Tree 17 of Life is rooted within a Danan framework for ordering minerals. 18 19 Page 1 Revision 2 of Ms. 5419 20 INTRODUCTION 21 In an essay dedicated to the evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr, Stephen Jay 22 Gould (2000) expresses his indignation at the sheer luckiness of Carolus Linnaeus 23 (1707-1778; Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Revision 1 Single-Crystal Elastic Properties of Minerals and Related
    Revision 1 Single-Crystal Elastic Properties of Minerals and Related Materials with Cubic Symmetry Thomas S. Duffy Department of Geosciences Princeton University Abstract The single-crystal elastic moduli of minerals and related materials with cubic symmetry have been collected and evaluated. The compiled dataset covers measurements made over an approximately seventy year period and consists of 206 compositions. More than 80% of the database is comprised of silicates, oxides, and halides, and approximately 90% of the entries correspond to one of six crystal structures (garnet, rocksalt, spinel, perovskite, sphalerite, and fluorite). Primary data recorded are the composition of each material, its crystal structure, density, and the three independent nonzero adiabatic elastic moduli (C11, C12, and C44). From these, a variety of additional elastic and acoustic properties are calculated and compiled, including polycrystalline aggregate elastic properties, sound velocities, and anisotropy factors. The database is used to evaluate trends in cubic mineral elasticity through consideration of normalized elastic moduli (Blackman diagrams) and the Cauchy pressure. The elastic anisotropy and auxetic behavior of these materials are also examined. Compilations of single-crystal elastic moduli provide a useful tool for investigation structure-property relationships of minerals. 1 Introduction The elastic moduli are among the most fundamental and important properties of minerals (Anderson et al. 1968). They are central to understanding mechanical behavior and have applications across many disciplines of the geosciences. They control the stress-strain relationship under elastic loading and are relevant to understanding strength, hardness, brittle/ductile behavior, damage tolerance, and mechanical stability. Elastic moduli govern the propagation of elastic waves and hence are essential to the interpretation of seismic data, including seismic anisotropy in the crust and mantle (Bass et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Sulfur and Zinc Availability from Co-Granulated Zn-Enriched Elemental Sulfur Fertilizers † § § § ⊥ Edson M
    Article pubs.acs.org/JAFC Sulfur and Zinc Availability from Co-granulated Zn-Enriched Elemental Sulfur Fertilizers † § § § ⊥ Edson M. Mattiello,*, Rodrigo C. da Silva, Fien Degryse, Roslyn Baird, Vadakattu V. S. R. Gupta, § # and Michael J. McLaughlin , † Department of Soil Science, Universidade Federal de Vicosa,̧ Vicosa,̧ Minas Gerais 36570-900, Brazil § School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Waite Campus, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia ⊥ CSIRO Agriculture and Food, PMB 2, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia # CSIRO Land and Water, PMB 2, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia ABSTRACT: Acidification by oxidation of elemental sulfur (ES) can solubilize ZnO, providing slow release of both sulfur (S) and zinc (Zn) in soil. For this study, a new granular fertilizer with ES and ZnO was produced and evaluated. The effect of incorporating microorganisms or a carbon source in the granule was also evaluated. Four granulated ES−Zn fertilizers with and without S-oxidizing microorganisms, a commercial ES pastille, ZnSO4, and ZnO were applied to the center of Petri dishes containing two contrasting pH soils. Soil pH, CaCl2-extractable S and Zn, and remaining ES were evaluated at 30 and 60 days in two soil sections (0−5 and 5−9 mm from the fertilizer application site). A visualization test was performed to evaluate Zn diffusion over time. A significant pH decrease was observed in the acidic soil for all ES−Zn fertilizer treatments and in the alkaline soil for the Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans-inoculated treatment only. In agreement with Zn visualization tests, extractable- Zn concentrations were higher from the point of application in the acidic (62.9 mg dm−3) compared to the alkaline soil (5.5 mg dm−3).
    [Show full text]
  • Why Nature Chose Selenium Hans J
    Reviews pubs.acs.org/acschemicalbiology Why Nature Chose Selenium Hans J. Reich*, ‡ and Robert J. Hondal*,† † University of Vermont, Department of Biochemistry, 89 Beaumont Ave, Given Laboratory, Room B413, Burlington, Vermont 05405, United States ‡ University of WisconsinMadison, Department of Chemistry, 1101 University Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States ABSTRACT: The authors were asked by the Editors of ACS Chemical Biology to write an article titled “Why Nature Chose Selenium” for the occasion of the upcoming bicentennial of the discovery of selenium by the Swedish chemist Jöns Jacob Berzelius in 1817 and styled after the famous work of Frank Westheimer on the biological chemistry of phosphate [Westheimer, F. H. (1987) Why Nature Chose Phosphates, Science 235, 1173−1178]. This work gives a history of the important discoveries of the biological processes that selenium participates in, and a point-by-point comparison of the chemistry of selenium with the atom it replaces in biology, sulfur. This analysis shows that redox chemistry is the largest chemical difference between the two chalcogens. This difference is very large for both one-electron and two-electron redox reactions. Much of this difference is due to the inability of selenium to form π bonds of all types. The outer valence electrons of selenium are also more loosely held than those of sulfur. As a result, selenium is a better nucleophile and will react with reactive oxygen species faster than sulfur, but the resulting lack of π-bond character in the Se−O bond means that the Se-oxide can be much more readily reduced in comparison to S-oxides.
    [Show full text]
  • Chrisstanleyite Ag2pd3se4 C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1
    Chrisstanleyite Ag2Pd3Se4 c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Monoclinic. Point Group: 2/m or 2. Anhedral crystals, to several hundred µm, aggregated in grains. Twinning: Fine polysynthetic and parquetlike, characteristic. Physical Properties: Tenacity: Slightly brittle. Hardness = ∼5 VHN = 371–421, 395 average (100 g load), D(meas.) = n.d. D(calc.) = 8.30 Optical Properties: Opaque. Color: Silvery gray. Streak: Black. Luster: Metallic. Optical Class: Biaxial. Pleochroism: Slight; pale buff to slightly gray-green buff. Anisotropism: Moderate; rose-brown, gray-green, pale bluish gray, dark steel-blue. Bireflectance: Weak to moderate. R1–R2: (400) 35.6–43.3, (420) 36.8–44.2, (440) 37.8–45.3, (460) 39.1–46.7, (480) 40.0–47.5, (500) 41.1–48.0, (520) 42.1–48.5, (540) 42.9–48.7, (560) 43.5–49.1, (580) 44.1–49.3, (600) 44.4–49.5, (620) 44.6–49.6, (640) 44.5–49.3, (660) 44.4–49.2, (680) 44.2–49.1, (700) 44.0–49.0 Cell Data: Space Group: P 21/m or P 21. a = 6.350(6) b = 10.387(4) c = 5.683(3) β = 114.90(5)◦ Z=2 X-ray Powder Pattern: Hope’s Nose, England. 2.742 (100), 1.956 (100), 2.688 (80), 2.868 (50b), 2.367 (50), 1.829 (30), 2.521 (20) Chemistry: (1) (2) (3) Pd 37.64 35.48 37.52 Pt 0.70 Hg 0.36 Ag 25.09 24.07 25.36 Cu 0.18 2.05 Se 36.39 38.50 37.12 Total 99.30 101.16 100.00 (1) Hope’s Nose, England; by electron microprobe, average of 26 analyses; corresponding to (Ag2.01Cu0.02)Σ=2.03Pd3.02Se3.95.
    [Show full text]
  • European Journal of Mineralogy
    Title Grundmannite, CuBiSe<SUB>2</SUB>, the Se-analogue of emplectite, a new mineral from the El Dragón mine, Potosí, Bolivia Authors Förster, Hans-Jürgen; Bindi, L; Stanley, Christopher Date Submitted 2016-05-04 European Journal of Mineralogy Composition and crystal structure of grundmannite, CuBiSe2, the Se-analogue of emplectite, a new mineral from the El Dragόn mine, Potosí, Bolivia --Manuscript Draft-- Manuscript Number: Article Type: Research paper Full Title: Composition and crystal structure of grundmannite, CuBiSe2, the Se-analogue of emplectite, a new mineral from the El Dragόn mine, Potosí, Bolivia Short Title: Composition and crystal structure of grundmannite, CuBiSe2, Corresponding Author: Hans-Jürgen Förster Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ Potsdam, GERMANY Corresponding Author E-Mail: [email protected] Order of Authors: Hans-Jürgen Förster Luca Bindi Chris J. Stanley Abstract: Grundmannite, ideally CuBiSe2, is a new mineral species from the El Dragόn mine, Department of Potosí, Bolivia. It is either filling small shrinkage cracks or interstices in brecciated kruta'ite−penroseite solid solutions or forms independent grains in the matrix. Grain size of the anhedral to subhedral crystals is usually in the range 50−150 µm, but may approach 250 µm. Grundmannite is usually intergrown with watkinsonite and clausthalite; other minerals occasionally being in intimate grain-boundary contact comprise quartz, dolomite, native gold, eskebornite, umangite, klockmannite, Co-rich penroseite, and three unnamed phases of the Cu−Bi−Hg−Pb−Se system, among which is an as-yet uncharacterizedspecies with the ideal composition Cu4Pb2HgBi4Se11. Eldragόnite and petrovicite rarely precipitated in the neighborhood of CuBiSe2. Grundmannite is non-fluorescent, black and opaque with a metallic luster and black streak.
    [Show full text]
  • IMA Master List
    The New IMA List of Minerals – A Work in Progress – Update: February 2013 In the following pages of this document a comprehensive list of all valid mineral species is presented. The list is distributed (for terms and conditions see below) via the web site of the Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification of the International Mineralogical Association, which is the organization in charge for approval of new minerals, and more in general for all issues related to the status of mineral species. The list, which will be updated on a regular basis, is intended as the primary and official source on minerals. Explanation of column headings: Name: it is the presently accepted mineral name (and in the table, minerals are sorted by name). Chemical formula: it is the CNMNC-approved formula. IMA status: A = approved (it applies to minerals approved after the establishment of the IMA in 1958); G = grandfathered (it applies to minerals discovered before the birth of IMA, and generally considered as valid species); Rd = redefined (it applies to existing minerals which were redefined during the IMA era); Rn = renamed (it applies to existing minerals which were renamed during the IMA era); Q = questionable (it applies to poorly characterized minerals, whose validity could be doubtful). IMA No. / Year: for approved minerals the IMA No. is given: it has the form XXXX-YYY, where XXXX is the year and YYY a sequential number; for grandfathered minerals the year of the original description is given. In some cases, typically for Rd and Rn minerals, the year may be followed by s.p.
    [Show full text]