DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction DRAFT March 23, 2018 | DRAFT Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Introduction Prepared for: City of Phoenix Aviation Department Prepared by: In association with: RICONDO C&S Engineers Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. PSM2, Inc. Trace Consulting, LLC Ricondo & Associates, Inc. (Ricondo) prepared this document for the stated purposes as expressly set forth herein and for the sole use of the City of Phoenix Aviation Department and its intended recipients. The techniques and methodologies used in preparing this document are consistent with industry practices at the time of preparation. DRAFT PHOENIX SKY HARBOR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MARCH 2018 DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Airport Setting .......................................................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2 Historical Airport Background ............................................................................................................................ 1-2 1.3 Comprehensive Asset Management Plan Documentation ..................................................................... 1-3 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 1-1 Airport Location Map......................................................................................................................................... 1-4 Exhibit 1-2 General Airport Vicinity Map .......................................................................................................................... 1-5 Comprehensive Asset Management Plan | i | Table of Contents DRAFT PHOENIX SKY HARBOR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MARCH 2018 DRAFT 1. INTRODUCTION The Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (the Airport or PHX) Comprehensive Asset Management Plan (CAMP) is a critical airport management and operations planning tool intended to guide airport development within a strategic framework reflecting airport management’s priorities, airport operational characteristics, and other relevant factors. The CAMP will aid in strategic decision-making as the City of Phoenix Aviation Department (PHX AVN) faces increasing demand at the Airport, a volatile aviation industry, changing airline business models, an expanding regulatory environment, and other challenges. The CAMP provides a plan for the Airport to keep pace with aviation growth in a cost effective and flexible manner, while considering environmental and socioeconomic impacts. The aviation industry has experienced tremendous change over the 30 years since the Airport’s last master plan was prepared. These changes have included enhanced security measures and processes, technological advancement of the airline check-in process, improved baggage screening technology and more-stringent regulations, the evolution of aircraft, and changes in airline and aviation industry economics. The CAMP provides a road map for efficiently accommodating aviation demand through the foreseeable future while preserving the flexibility to respond to evolving industry conditions, the regulatory environment, and the characteristics of airport activity. CAMP reports will describe the short-, medium-, and long-term development plans to meet future aviation demand. The planning process will consider on- and off-airport development affected by the Airport and will vary in complexity and level of detail, depending upon the size, function, and potential impacts of that development. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) provides grant assistance to airports preparing airport master plans and requires the approval of the aviation activity forecast used in developing the plan and the resulting Airport Layout Plan (ALP)—a drawing showing the 20-year development plan for the airport. For aviation-related projects to be eligible to receive federal funding in the future, they must be shown on an ALP approved by the FAA. Key objectives and considerations when developing CAMP recommendations include: ensuring safety and security; maintaining consistency with the overall vision and goals for the Airport; developing practical and affordable recommendations that provide facilities as they are needed; maintaining consistent and coordinated development that aligns with City of Phoenix and regional plans; minimizing impact on current operations; optimizing operational efficiencies and flexibility; enhancing customer service and satisfaction; providing flexibility to respond to the changing needs of the dynamic aviation industry; meeting sustainability goals; and Comprehensive Asset Management Plan | 1-1 | Introduction DRAFT PHOENIX SKY HARBOR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MARCH 2018 DRAFT meeting environmental requirements. 1.1 AIRPORT SETTING PHX is a major transportation hub located 5 miles east of the city of Phoenix central business district and serves the Phoenix metropolitan area. As the twelfth busiest airport in the United States (U.S.) in 2016 based on annual passengers, the Airport serves an important role in the national aviation system. The Airport is situated on approximately 3,000 acres in Maricopa County bordered by Interstate 10 (I-10) to the west, Air Lane to the north, State Route 143 and South 44th Street to the east, and the Salt River to the south. The City of Phoenix also owns several properties outside of these boundaries that are controlled and maintained by PHX AVN. The location of the Airport is shown on Exhibit 1-1. The general vicinity of the Airport and Airport property are shown on Exhibit 1-2. 1.2 HISTORICAL AIRPORT BACKGROUND Scenic Airways developed the Airport in 1928 with a single runway (existing Runway 7L-25R). It was acquired by the City of Phoenix in 1935. In the 1950s, a second parallel runway (existing Runway 8-26) and a crossfield runway (Runway 3-211) were constructed. The southernmost Runway 7R-25L was opened in the year 2000. Since the 1930s, the Airport has been served by many airlines, including those who serve or have served the Airport as a hub or focus city, 2 such as Trans World Airlines (TWA), Bonanza Airlines, America West Airlines, US Airways, American Airlines, and Southwest Airlines. PHX remains a hub airport for American Airlines (which merged with US Airways in 2013), 3 and has been a focus city for Southwest Airlines since 1982.4 The Airport has been developed with four independent terminals: Terminal 1 – Terminal 1 was constructed in 1952 and originally accommodated operations by American Airlines, TWA, Frontier Airlines, and Western Airlines. Construction of Terminal 1 also included the Airport’s first Airport Traffic Control Tower (ATCT). Terminal 1 was demolished in 1991; remnants of the apron for the circular building are still visible around the West Economy Parking Lot and aircraft apron west of Terminal 2. Terminal 2 – Terminal 2 opened in 1962 with a terminal building, including ticketing and baggage claim, and a single pier with 19 aircraft gates. Over time, the gates have been reconfigured to accommodate larger aircraft, reducing the number of usable gates to 10. Terminal 3 – Terminal 3 opened in 1976 and was the first terminal at PHX to include a connected parking garage. It consists of a terminal building and two concourses; one on the north side and one on the 1 Runway 3-21 was subsequently decommissioned and demolished to allow for the construction of Terminal 2. 2 A focus city is an airport that primarily serves an airline’s point-to-point routes and caters more to the local market rather than to connecting passengers. 3 America West Airlines, https://www.aa.com/i18n/customer-service/about-us/history-of-american-airlines.jsp (accessed December 2017). 4 Southwest Airlines, https://www.swamedia.com/h3ages/city-fact-sheets (accessed December 2017). Comprehensive Asset Management Plan | 1-2 | Introduction DRAFT PHOENIX SKY HARBOR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MARCH 2018 DRAFT south side of Sky Harbor Boulevard. This arrangement established the split terminal roadway as it remains today—allowing for terminal curb on both north and south sides of the terminal building. The North Concourse originally accommodated 16 aircraft gates and the South Concourse accommodated 6 gates. As of March 2018, the North Concourse supports 10 gates and the South Concourse is under reconstruction as part of the Terminal 3 Modernization Program. Terminal 4 – Terminal 4 opened in 1990 and was the last terminal to open at the Airport. The terminal, planned for four concourses on the north side and four on the south side, was initially constructed with three concourses on the north side and two concourses on the south side. The fourth concourse on the north side was opened in 2001 and the third concourse on the south side was opened in 2005. The fourth concourse on the south side is planned to be opened in 2021. As of 2017, Terminal 4 supports 83 aircraft gates on the seven separate concourses. Numerous other facilities have been developed at the Airport over the years, including economy parking garages, the Rental Car Center, cargo facilities, airline maintenance facilities, and corporate and general aviation facilities. Since the 1950s, the Airport has been home to the 161st Air Refueling Wing of the Arizona Air National Guard. 1.3 COMPREHENSIVE ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN DOCUMENTATION The remainder of the CAMP includes the following sections: Existing Conditions Aviation Activity Forecasts Facility Requirements Alternatives Development and Evaluation Recommended Comprehensive Asset Management Plan Implementation Plan Comprehensive Asset Management Plan | 1-3 | Introduction .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 of 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report
    IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 OF 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report AGREEMENT : Standard PERIOD: P01 September 2021 MEMBER CODE MEMBER NAME ZONE STATUS CATEGORY XB-B72 "INTERAVIA" LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY B Live Associate Member FV-195 "ROSSIYA AIRLINES" JSC D Live IATA Airline 2I-681 21 AIR LLC C Live ACH XD-A39 617436 BC LTD DBA FREIGHTLINK EXPRESS C Live ACH 4O-837 ABC AEROLINEAS S.A. DE C.V. B Suspended Non-IATA Airline M3-549 ABSA - AEROLINHAS BRASILEIRAS S.A. C Live ACH XB-B11 ACCELYA AMERICA B Live Associate Member XB-B81 ACCELYA FRANCE S.A.S D Live Associate Member XB-B05 ACCELYA MIDDLE EAST FZE B Live Associate Member XB-B40 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS AMERICAS INC B Live Associate Member XB-B52 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS INDIA LTD. D Live Associate Member XB-B28 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B70 ACCELYA UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B86 ACCELYA WORLD, S.L.U D Live Associate Member 9B-450 ACCESRAIL AND PARTNER RAILWAYS D Live Associate Member XB-280 ACCOUNTING CENTRE OF CHINA AVIATION B Live Associate Member XB-M30 ACNA D Live Associate Member XB-B31 ADB SAFEGATE AIRPORT SYSTEMS UK LTD. A Live Associate Member JP-165 ADRIA AIRWAYS D.O.O. D Suspended Non-IATA Airline A3-390 AEGEAN AIRLINES S.A. D Live IATA Airline KH-687 AEKO KULA LLC C Live ACH EI-053 AER LINGUS LIMITED B Live IATA Airline XB-B74 AERCAP HOLDINGS NV B Live Associate Member 7T-144 AERO EXPRESS DEL ECUADOR - TRANS AM B Live Non-IATA Airline XB-B13 AERO INDUSTRIAL SALES COMPANY B Live Associate Member P5-845 AERO REPUBLICA S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Schedules
    Airline Schedules This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on January 08, 2019. English (eng) Describing Archives: A Content Standard Special Collections and Archives Division, History of Aviation Archives. 3020 Waterview Pkwy SP2 Suite 11.206 Richardson, Texas 75080 [email protected]. URL: https://www.utdallas.edu/library/special-collections-and-archives/ Airline Schedules Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Content ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Series Description .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 4 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Controlled Access Headings .......................................................................................................................... 5 Collection Inventory ....................................................................................................................................... 6 - Page 2 - Airline Schedules Summary Information Repository:
    [Show full text]
  • Air Travel Consumer Report Is a Monthly Product of the Department of Transportation's Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings
    U.S. Department of Transportation Air Travel Consumer Report Issued: MARCH 2002 Includes data for the following periods: Flight Delays January 2002 12 Months Ending January 2002 Mishandled Baggage January 2002 Oversales 4th Quarter 2001 January-December 2001 Consumer Complaints January 2002 (Includes Disability Complaints) Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings http://www.dot.gov/airconsumer/ TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Section Page INTRODUCTION ......................…2 Flight Delays Explanation ......................…3 Mishandled Baggage Table 1 ......................…4 Explanation ....................…..17 Overall Percentage of Reported Flight Ranking ....................…..18 Operations Arriving On Time, by Carrier Table 1A ......................…5 Oversales Overall Percentage of Reported Flight Explanation ....................…..19 Operations Arriving On Time and Carrier Rank, by Month, Quarter, and Data Base to Date Ranking--Quarter ....................…..20 Table 2 ......................…6 Ranking--YTD ....................…..21 Number of Reported Flight Arrivals and Per- centage Arriving On Time, by Carrier and Airport Consumer Complaints Table 3 ......................…8 Explanation ....................…..22 Percentage of All Carriers' Reported Flight Complaint Tables 1-5 ..............23 Operations Arriving On Time, by Airport and Summary, Complaint Categories, U.S. Airlines, Time of Day Incident Date, and Companies Other Than Table 4 .....................…9 U.S. Airlines Percentage of All Carriers' Reported Flight Rankings,
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment F – Participants in the Agreement
    Revenue Accounting Manual B16 ATTACHMENT F – PARTICIPANTS IN THE AGREEMENT 1. TABULATION OF PARTICIPANTS 0B 475 BLUE AIR AIRLINE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS S.R.L. 1A A79 AMADEUS IT GROUP SA 1B A76 SABRE ASIA PACIFIC PTE. LTD. 1G A73 Travelport International Operations Limited 1S A01 SABRE INC. 2D 54 EASTERN AIRLINES, LLC 2I 156 STAR UP S.A. 2I 681 21 AIR LLC 2J 226 AIR BURKINA 2K 547 AEROLINEAS GALAPAGOS S.A. AEROGAL 2T 212 TIMBIS AIR SERVICES 2V 554 AMTRAK 3B 383 Transportes Interilhas de Cabo Verde, Sociedade Unipessoal, SA 3E 122 MULTI-AERO, INC. DBA AIR CHOICE ONE 3J 535 Jubba Airways Limited 3K 375 JETSTAR ASIA AIRWAYS PTE LTD 3L 049 AIR ARABIA ABDU DHABI 3M 449 SILVER AIRWAYS CORP. 3S 875 CAIRE DBA AIR ANTILLES EXPRESS 3U 876 SICHUAN AIRLINES CO. LTD. 3V 756 TNT AIRWAYS S.A. 3X 435 PREMIER TRANS AIRE INC. 4B 184 BOUTIQUE AIR, INC. 4C 035 AEROVIAS DE INTEGRACION REGIONAL 4L 174 LINEAS AEREAS SURAMERICANAS S.A. 4M 469 LAN ARGENTINA S.A. 4N 287 AIR NORTH CHARTER AND TRAINING LTD. 4O 837 ABC AEROLINEAS S.A. DE C.V. 4S 644 SOLAR CARGO, C.A. 4U 051 GERMANWINGS GMBH 4X 805 MERCURY AIR CARGO, INC. 4Z 749 SA AIRLINK 5C 700 C.A.L. CARGO AIRLINES LTD. 5J 203 CEBU PACIFIC AIR 5N 316 JOINT-STOCK COMPANY NORDAVIA - REGIONAL AIRLINES 5O 558 ASL AIRLINES FRANCE 5T 518 CANADIAN NORTH INC. 5U 911 TRANSPORTES AEREOS GUATEMALTECOS S.A. 5X 406 UPS 5Y 369 ATLAS AIR, INC. 50 Standard Agreement For SIS Participation – B16 5Z 225 CEMAIR (PTY) LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D. C
    1 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D. C. 20549 _____________ FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of earliest event reported: April 9, 2001 American Airlines, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 1-2691 13-1502798 (State of Incorporation) ( Commission File Number) (IRS Employer Identification No.) 4333 Amon Carter Blvd. Fort Worth, Texas 76155 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (817) 963-1234 (Registrant's telephone number) 2 Item 5. Other Events American Airlines, Inc. ("American", a wholly owned subsidiary of AMR Corporation) is filing herewith a press release issued on April 9, 2001 as Exhibit 99.1 which is included herein. This press release was issued to announce the completion of American's acquisition of Trans World Airways, Inc. Item 7. Financial Statements and Exhibits The following exhibit is included herein: 99.1 Press Release 3 SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized. American Airlines, Inc. /s/ Charles D. MarLett Charles D. MarLett Corporate Secretary Dated: April 10, 2001 4 EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit Description 99.1 Press Release 5 Exhibit 99.1 Contact: Corporate Communications Fort Worth, Texas 817-967-1577 FOR RELEASE: Monday, April 9, 2001 AMERICAN AIRLINES COMPLETES ACQUISITION OF TRANS WORLD AIRLINES Combination Will Offer Greater Service to Customers And Create New Job Opportunities Business as Usual During Transition for TWA Employees, Passengers and Ticketholders FORT WORTH, Texas - A new era in aviation history began today as American Airlines successfully completed its acquisition of most of the assets of Trans World Airlines, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Bankruptcy Tilts Playing Field Frank Boroch, CFA 212 272-6335 [email protected]
    Equity Research Airlines / Rated: Market Underweight September 15, 2005 Research Analyst(s): David Strine 212 272-7869 [email protected] Bankruptcy tilts playing field Frank Boroch, CFA 212 272-6335 [email protected] Key Points *** TWIN BANKRUPTCY FILINGS TILT PLAYING FIELD. NWAC and DAL filed for Chapter 11 protection yesterday, becoming the 20 and 21st airlines to do so since 2000. Now with 47% of industry capacity in bankruptcy, the playing field looks set to become even more lopsided pressuring non-bankrupt legacies to lower costs further and low cost carriers to reassess their shrinking CASM advantage. *** CAPACITY PULLBACK. Over the past 20 years, bankrupt carriers decreased capacity by 5-10% on avg in the year following their filing. If we assume DAL and NWAC shrink by 7.5% (the midpoint) in '06, our domestic industry ASM forecast goes from +2% y/y to flat, which could potentially be favorable for airline pricing (yields). *** NWAC AND DAL INTIMATE CAPACITY RESTRAINT. After their filing yesterday, NWAC's CEO indicated 4Q:05 capacity could decline 5-6% y/y, while Delta announced plans to accelerate its fleet simplification plan, removing four aircraft types by the end of 2006. *** BIGGEST BENEFICIARIES LIKELY TO BE LOW COST CARRIERS. NWAC and DAL account for roughly 26% of domestic capacity, which, if trimmed by 7.5% equates to a 2% pt reduction in industry capacity. We believe LCC-heavy routes are likely to see a disproportionate benefit from potential reductions at DAL and NWAC, with AAI, AWA, and JBLU in particular having an easier path for growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Airplus Company Account: Airline Acceptance
    AirPlus Company Account: Airline Acceptance IATA ICAO Country GDS ONLINE (Web) Comments Code Code Acceptance DBI Acceptance DBI Aegean Airlines A3 AEE GR a a a online acceptance: web & mobile Aer Arann RE REA IE a a Aer Lingus P.L.C. EI EIN IE a a a * Aeroflot Russian Intl. Airlines SU AFL RU a a a Aerogal 2K GLG EC a a Aeromar VW TAO MX a a a Aeroméxico AM AMX MX a a a Air Algérie AH DAH DZ a a Air Alps A6 LPV AT a a Air Astana KC KZR KZ a a Air Austral UU REU RE a a Air Baltic BT BTI LV a a Air Busan BX ABL KR a a Air Canada AC ACA CA a a a * Air Caraibes TX FWI FR a a a Air China CA CCA CN a a a a online acceptance in China only Air Corsica XK CCM FR a a Air Dolomiti EN DLA IT a a a Air Europa UX AEA ES a a Air France AF AFR FR a a a * Air Greenland GL GRL GL a a a Air India AI AIC IN a a Air Macau NX AMU MO a a Air Malta KM AMC MT a a a Air Mauritius MK MAU MU a a Air New Zealand NZ ANZ NZ a a a Air Niugini PX ANG PG a a a Air One AP ADH IT a a a Air Serbia JU ASL RS a a a Air Seychelles HM SEY SC a a Air Tahiti Nui VT VTA PF a a Air Vanuatu NF AVN VU a a Air Wisconsin ZW WSN US a a a Aircalin (Air Calédonie Intl.) SB ACI FR a a Air-Taxi Europe - TWG DE a a * AirTran Airways FL TRS US a a a * Alaska Airlines AS ASA US a a a Alitalia AZ AZA IT a a a * All Nippon Airways (ANA) NH ANA JP a a a American Airlines AA AAL US a a a * APG Airlines GP - FR a a a Arik Air W3 ARA NG a a Asiana Airlines OZ AAR KR a a a * Austrian Airlines OS AUA AT a a a a Avianca AV AVA CO a a Azul Linhas Aéreas Brasileiras AD AZU BR a a a Bahamasair UP BHS BS a a Bangkok Airways PG BKP TH a a Bearskin Airlines JV BLS US a a Beijing Capital Airlines JD CBJ CN a a Biman Bangladesh BG BBC BD a a BizCharters (BizAir Shuttle) - - US a a Blue Panorama BV BPA IT a a * Boliviana de Aviación OB BOV BO a a a British Airways BA BAW UK a a a a only one DBI field for online bookings available Brussels Airlines SN BEL BE a a a a Canadian North Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Airlines Codes
    Airlines codes Sorted by Airlines Sorted by Code Airline Code Airline Code Aces VX Deutsche Bahn AG 2A Action Airlines XQ Aerocondor Trans Aereos 2B Acvilla Air WZ Denim Air 2D ADA Air ZY Ireland Airways 2E Adria Airways JP Frontier Flying Service 2F Aea International Pte 7X Debonair Airways 2G AER Lingus Limited EI European Airlines 2H Aero Asia International E4 Air Burkina 2J Aero California JR Kitty Hawk Airlines Inc 2K Aero Continente N6 Karlog Air 2L Aero Costa Rica Acori ML Moldavian Airlines 2M Aero Lineas Sosa P4 Haiti Aviation 2N Aero Lloyd Flugreisen YP Air Philippines Corp 2P Aero Service 5R Millenium Air Corp 2Q Aero Services Executive W4 Island Express 2S Aero Zambia Z9 Canada Three Thousand 2T Aerocaribe QA Western Pacific Air 2U Aerocondor Trans Aereos 2B Amtrak 2V Aeroejecutivo SA de CV SX Pacific Midland Airlines 2W Aeroflot Russian SU Helenair Corporation Ltd 2Y Aeroleasing SA FP Changan Airlines 2Z Aeroline Gmbh 7E Mafira Air 3A Aerolineas Argentinas AR Avior 3B Aerolineas Dominicanas YU Corporate Express Airline 3C Aerolineas Internacional N2 Palair Macedonian Air 3D Aerolineas Paraguayas A8 Northwestern Air Lease 3E Aerolineas Santo Domingo EX Air Inuit Ltd 3H Aeromar Airlines VW Air Alliance 3J Aeromexico AM Tatonduk Flying Service 3K Aeromexpress QO Gulfstream International 3M Aeronautica de Cancun RE Air Urga 3N Aeroperlas WL Georgian Airlines 3P Aeroperu PL China Yunnan Airlines 3Q Aeropostal Alas VH Avia Air Nv 3R Aerorepublica P5 Shuswap Air 3S Aerosanta Airlines UJ Turan Air Airline Company 3T Aeroservicios
    [Show full text]
  • Scalability of the Air Transportation System and Development of Multi-Airport Systems: a Worldwide Perspective
    Scalability of the Air Transportation System and Development of Multi-Airport Systems: A Worldwide Perspective by Philippe A. Bonnefoy B. Ing., Mechanical Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Canada, 2002 S.M., Aeronautics & Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2005 Submitted to the engineering systems division in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2008 2008 Philippe A. Bonnefoy, All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT the permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signature of Author: ______________________________________________________ Philippe A. Bonnefoy Engineering Systems Division May 30th 2008 Certified by: _____________________________________________________________ R. John Hansman, Professor Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Engineering Systems Thesis Supervisor Certified by: _____________________________________________________________ Cynthia Barnhart, Professor Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Engineering Systems Certified by: _____________________________________________________________ Richard de Neufville, Professor Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Engineering Systems Certified by: _____________________________________________________________ Amedeo Odoni, Professor Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Civil and Environmental Engineering Accepted
    [Show full text]
  • Trans World Airlines, Inc. V. Independent Federation of Flight Attendants: a Fundamental Blow to Collective Bargaining
    Missouri Law Review Volume 54 Issue 4 Fall 1989 Article 4 Fall 1989 Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Independent Federation of Flight Attendants: A Fundamental Blow to Collective Bargaining David Allen Larson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation David Allen Larson, Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Independent Federation of Flight Attendants: A Fundamental Blow to Collective Bargaining, 54 MO. L. REV. (1989) Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol54/iss4/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Missouri Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Larson: Larson: Trans World Airlines TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC. v. INDEPENDENT FEDERATION OF FLIGHT ATTENDANTS: A FUNDAMENTAL BLOW TO COLLECTIVE BARGAINING By: David Allen Larson* The United States Supreme Court recently allowed Trans World Airlines, Inc. (TWA) to make a promise to striking employees that significantly affects unions' ability to engage in collective action. In Trans World Airlines Inc. v. Independent Federation of Flight Attendants,' a case arising under the Railway Labor Act (RLA),2 TWA was permitted to encourage junior strikers to immediately return to work by promising them that they would not be displaced at the end of the strike by more senior full-time strikers. The Supreme Court rejected the argument that this would result in a loss of seniority for the full-time strikers because those strikers retain seniority for purposes of future reductions of force, future vacancies in desirable assignments, and job scheduling.
    [Show full text]
  • Lift 2020 Spring
    THE ALUMNI MAGAZINE OF EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY SPRING 2020 On the Horizon Alumni are leading the autonomous systems industrial revolution PAGE 12 FROM THE PRESIDENT Llft ......................................... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Volume 16, No. 1 Lift, the alumni magazine of Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, is published twice annually (spring and fall) by the division of This issue focuses on autonomous Philanthropy & Alumni Engagement. systems. From a technology Copyright © 2020 perspective, they can help us collect Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Florida/Arizona/Worldwide data without putting anyone in harm’s 1 Aerospace Blvd. Daytona Beach, FL 32114 way. We can restore independence to All rights reserved. people by giving them new mobility Senior Vice President of Philanthropy options. We can move materials & Alumni Engagement Marc Archambault expeditiously. As impressive as the Executive Director of Alumni Engagement “how” of these systems is — now, Bill Thompson (’87) more than ever, I want to acknowledge PHILANTHROPY & ALUMNI the “why.” We don’t pursue these COMMUNICATIONS Executive Director of Communications projects to create gizmos and gadgets. Anthony Brown Senior Director of Communications/Editor We create them to put technology in Sara Withrow Assistant Director of Communications service to society. Melanie Stawicki Azam Assistant Director of Digital Engagement & Philanthropy Applying science, technology, Beyond our campus communities, our work Alan Marcos Pinto Cesar engineering and mathematics — STEM as a global research and engineering institution Assistant Digital Engagement Coordinator skills — to real-world problems goes back to has far-reaching impact and potential. This Cynthia Puckett issue describes how an alumnus — through our roots in early aviation. So does a sense CONTRIBUTORS of duty to our communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Evangelinos V. Trans World Airlines: Aviation - Warsaw Convention - Liability of Airline Carrier
    Maryland Journal of International Law Volume 3 | Issue 1 Article 29 Evangelinos v. Trans World Airlines: Aviation - Warsaw Convention - Liability of Airline Carrier Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mjil Part of the International Law Commons, and the International Trade Commons Recommended Citation Evangelinos v. Trans World Airlines: Aviation - Warsaw Convention - Liability of Airline Carrier, 3 Md. J. Int'l L. 299 (1977). Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mjil/vol3/iss1/29 This Recent Developments is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maryland Journal of International Law by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AVIATION - WARSAW CONVENTION - AIRLINE CAR- RIER IS LIABLE FOR INJURIES SUSTAINED BY PAS- SENGERS PRIOR TO BOARDING DURING TERRORIST ATTACK - Evangelinos v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 550 F.2d 152 (3d Cir. 1977); Day v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 528 F.2d 31 (2d Cir. 1975). In Evangelinos v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.' and Day v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.,2 the United States Courts of Appeals for the Third and Second Circuits held that under Article 17 of the Warsaw Convention,3 as modified by the Montreal Agreement of 1966, 4 an airline carrier was liable for the injuries suffered by its passengers prior to the actual boarding of the aircraft once those boarding procedures were substantially under way. The litigation in Day and Evangelinos arose out of the tragic events which took place at Hellenikon Airport in Athens, Greece on August 5, 1973.5 At approximately 3 p.m.
    [Show full text]