DOCSLIB.ORG

The Current Biodiversity Extinction Event: Scenarios for Mitigation and Recovery

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Current Biodiversity Extinction Event: Scenarios for Mitigation and Recovery Colloquium The current biodiversity extinction event: Scenarios for mitigation and recovery Michael J. Novacek*† and Elsa E. Cleland‡ *American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024; and ‡Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 The current massive degradation of habitat and extinction of altered or encroached on by human activity (i.e., protecting species is taking place on a catastrophically short timescale, and ‘‘hotspots’’). A fourth recovery scenario involves enlightened their effects will fundamentally reset the future evolution of the human intervention beyond simple measures of wilderness pres- planet’s biota. The fossil record suggests that recovery of global ervation, a strategy that embraces ecosystem management and ecosystems has required millions or even tens of millions of years. mitigation of the current alteration of global biogeochemical Thus, intervention by humans, the very agents of the current cycles. Here, strong preference is expressed for the last of these environmental crisis, is required for any possibility of short-term options. Clearly, the future of evolution of the planet’s biota recovery or maintenance of the biota. Many current recovery depends significantly on what we do now to minimize loss of efforts have deficiencies, including insufficient information on the species, populations, and habitats. At the same time, there is diversity and distribution of species, ecological processes, and acute recognition of the challenges and potential shortcomings magnitude and interaction of threats to biodiversity (pollution, of many attempts at remediation and recovery. It is hoped that overharvesting, climate change, disruption of biogeochemical cy- this panel’s consideration of major threats, their interaction, and cles, introduced or invasive species, habitat loss and fragmentation the linkage between science and conservation in mitigating these through land use, disruption of community structure in habitats, threats suggest some feasible recovery scenarios at several and others). A much greater and more urgently applied investment different scales. to address these deficiencies is obviously warranted. Conservation and restoration in human-dominated ecosystems must strengthen Lessons from the Past: Recovery as a Long-Term Phenomenon connections between human activities, such as agricultural or It is clear that the fossil record powerfully indicates the reality harvesting practices, and relevant research generated in the bio- of extinction on many scales, the magnitude as well as selectivity logical, earth, and atmospheric sciences. Certain threats to biodi- of effects, and the pattern of recovery and survival (11, 12). To versity require intensive international cooperation and input from what extent then does the fossil record help us in forecasting both the scientific community to mitigate their harmful effects, includ- scenarios for extinction and recovery in the current crisis? ing climate change and alteration of global biogeochemical cycles. Consideration of this question moves us to acknowledge that In a world already transformed by human activity, the connection there are several aspects of these past events that diminish their between humans and the ecosystems they depend on must frame relevance to the current situation. any strategy for the recovery of the biota. First, ancient mass extinction events have been documented over comparatively long or imprecise timescales. The current here is consensus in the scientific community that the current crisis has been extended through historical times, a matter of Tmassive degradation of habitat and extinction of many of the centuries or a millennium, with a greatly accelerated impact that Earth’s biota is unprecedented and is taking place on a cata- began during the 20th century with the exponential increase of strophically short timescale. Based on extinction rates estimated world human populations. Thus, a period of only 75 to 100 years to be thousands of times the background rate, figures approach- may be most critical to the transformation of the present biota. ing 30% extermination of all species by the mid 21st century are Second, mass extinction events of the past are typified by not unrealistic (1–4), an event comparable to some of the global scale ecological transformation. By contrast, the current catastrophic mass extinction events of the past (5, 6). The current event is typified by a ‘‘patchy’’ pattern involving habitat frag- rate of rainforest destruction poses a profound threat to species mentation and loss, where impacts vary markedly for different diversity (7). Likewise, the degradation of the marine ecosystems habitats and different regions of the world (13). There is a large (8, 9) is directly evident through the denudation of species that body of evidence that suggests global climate changes and were once dominant and integral to such ecosystems. Indeed, alteration of global biogeochemical cycles may cause widespread this colloquium is framed by a view that if the current global transformations of ecosystems, but significant biodiversity loss extinction event is of the magnitude that seems to be well has not yet been linked to these impacts. indicated by the data at hand, then its effects will fundamentally Third, data on mass extinction events in the fossil record often reset the future evolution of the planet’s biota. fail to provide a clear connection between a primary cause and The devastating impact of the current biodiversity crisis moves effect (14–16). In contrast, the current biodiversity crisis has one us to consider the possibilities for the recovery of the biota. obvious biotic cause: ourselves. Moreover, the source of the Here, there are several options. First, a rebound could occur trauma also has the presumed capacity to mitigate its own from a natural reversal in trends. Such a pattern would, however, deleterious impact. Although the extinction of many species may require an unacceptably long timescale; recoveries from mass be an irreversible outcome of the current event, certain aspects extinction in the fossil record are measured in millions or tens of of human-caused global change are reversible. millions of years (10). Second, recovery could result from unacceptably Malthusian compensation—namely, marked re- duction in the world population of human consumers. Third, This paper was presented at the National Academy of Sciences colloquium, ‘‘The Future of some degree of recovery could result from a policy that protects Evolution,’’ held March 16–20, 2000, at the Arnold and Mabel Beckman Center in Irvine, CA. key habitats even with minimal protection of ecosystems already †To whom reprint requests should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]. 5466–5470 ͉ PNAS ͉ May 8, 2001 ͉ vol. 98 ͉ no. 10 www.pnas.org͞cgi͞doi͞10.1073͞pnas.091093698 Downloaded by guest on September 23, 2021 All of the above distinctions are pertinent to any scenario for One danger addressed by such efforts is the mismatch between recovery that might be extracted from fossil and geological the scale of the effect and the cause. The devastation of the coral evidence. Various reviews suggest that replenishment and di- reefs, sea grasses, and kelps in the Caribbean has been promoted versification of the biota following mass extinction events re- by the loss of benthic producers whose viable populations in turn quired a recovery phase of millions or tens of millions of years may have been greatly reduced by pollutants in runoff released (10, 12, 15). Surely such estimates based on fossil data indicate through human activity along the shoreline (8, 9). What may at the time lag that might be expected for a natural recovery of the first appear to be a complex crisis of subtle ecological dynamics biota following the current extinction event. Nonetheless, such could have a very direct and efficiently corrected cause—namely, lessons from the past do not effectively inform our scenarios for the introduction of the pollutants in the first place. One con- either current extinction or recovery given the emphatic role of structive effort here is the continual refinement of categories of humans in both processes. pollutants according to both the scale (global and local) and intensity (degree of toxicity, mutagenic impact, etc.) of the Near-Term Scenarios for Recovery: A Strategy effects. This often requires exacting experimental work, as in the Given the limited applicability of the record of past extinction identification of a link between polyvinyl chlorides (PVCs) in events for examining the current environmental crisis, it seems packaging and carcinogenic chemicals (21). Such toxin detective appropriate to turn to near-term recovery scenarios—namely, work must be applied to a much broader range of potential cases. scenarios that relate to human intervention just as they flow from human causation. Such a consideration involves at least Overharvesting. There is of course a clear and overlapping three steps. First, we must identify the threats to the biota and relationship between overharvesting and other threats to biodi- the entities most vulnerable to these threats. Second, we must versity, such as land use, but the matter deserves distinction here. consider the scientific principles or strategies that inform pre- Overharvesting impacts natural habitats with food sources that scriptions to alleviate the threats. Third, we must apply feasible are less dominated by agriculture or other human activities that recovery
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Species Extinctions
    http://www.iucn.org/about/union/commissions/wcpa/?7695/Multiple-ocean-stresses- threaten-globally-significant-marine-extinction Multiple ocean stresses threaten “globally significant” marine extinction 20 June 2011 | News story An international panel of experts warns in a report released today that marine species are at risk of entering a phase of extinction unprecedented in human history. The preliminary report arises from a ‘State of the Oceans’ workshop co-hosted by IUCN in April, the first ever to consider the cumulative impact of all pressures on the oceans. Considering the latest research across all areas of marine science, the workshop examined the combined effects of pollution, acidification, ocean warming, over-fishing and hypoxia (deoxygenation). The scientific panel concluded that the combination of stresses on the ocean is creating the conditions associated with every previous major extinction of species in Earth’s history. And the speed and rate of degeneration in the ocean is far greater than anyone has predicted. The panel concluded that many of the negative impacts previously identified are greater than the worst predictions. As a result, although difficult to assess, the first steps to globally significant extinction may have begun with a rise in the extinction threat to marine species such as reef- forming corals. “The world’s leading experts on oceans are surprised by the rate and magnitude of changes we are seeing,” says Dan Laffoley, Marine Chair of IUCN’s World Commission on Protected Areas, Senior Advisor on Marine Science and Conservation for IUCN and co-author of the report. “The challenges for the future of the ocean are vast, but unlike previous generations, we know what now needs to happen.
    [Show full text]
  • Simple Stochastic Populations in Habi- Tats with Bounded, and Varying Carry- Ing Capacities
    Simple Stochastic Populations in Habi- tats with Bounded, and Varying Carry- ing Capacities Master’s thesis in Complex Adaptive Systems EDWARD KORVEH Department of Mathematical Sciences CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Gothenburg, Sweden 2016 Master’s thesis 2016:NN Simple Stochastic Populations in Habitats with Bounded, and Varying Carrying Capacities EDWARD KORVEH Department of Mathematical Sciences Division of Mathematical Statistics Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg, Sweden 2016 Simple Stochastic Populations in Habitats with Bounded, and Varying Carrying Capacities EDWARD KORVEH © EDWARD KORVEH, 2016. Supervisor: Peter Jagers, Department of Mathematical Sciences Examiner: Peter Jagers, Department of Mathematical Sciences Master’s Thesis 2016:NN Department of Mathematical Sciences Division of Mathematical Statistics Chalmers University of Technology SE-412 96 Gothenburg Gothenburg, Sweden 2016 iv Simple Stochastic Populations in Habitats with Bounded, and Varying Carrying Capacities EDWARD KORVEH Department of Mathematical Sciences Chalmers University of Technology Abstract A population consisting of one single type of individuals where reproduction is sea- sonal, and by means of asexual binary-splitting with a probability, which depends on the carrying capacity of the habitat, K and the present population is considered. Current models for such binary-splitting populations do not explicitly capture the concepts of early and late extinctions. A new parameter v, called the ‘scaling pa- rameter’ is introduced to scale down the splitting probabilities in the first season, and also in subsequent generations in order to properly observe and record early and late extinctions. The modified model is used to estimate the probabilities of early and late extinctions, and the expected time to extinction in two main cases.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sixth Great Extinction Donations Events "Soon a Millennium Will End
    The Rewilding Institute, Dave Foreman, continental conservation Home | Contact | The EcoWild Program | Around the Campfire About Us Fellows The Pleistocene-Holocene Event: Mission Vision The Sixth Great Extinction Donations Events "Soon a millennium will end. With it will pass four billion years of News evolutionary exuberance. Yes, some species will survive, particularly the smaller, tenacious ones living in places far too dry and cold for us to farm or graze. Yet we Resources must face the fact that the Cenozoic, the Age of Mammals which has been in retreat since the catastrophic extinctions of the late Pleistocene is over, and that the Anthropozoic or Catastrophozoic has begun." --Michael Soulè (1996) [Extinction is the gravest conservation problem of our era. Indeed, it is the gravest problem humans face. The following discussion is adapted from Chapters 1, 2, and 4 of Dave Foreman’s Rewilding North America.] Click Here For Full PDF Report... or read report below... Many of our reports are in Adobe Acrobat PDF Format. If you don't already have one, the free Acrobat Reader can be downloaded by clicking this link. The Crisis The most important—and gloomy—scientific discovery of the twentieth century was the extinction crisis. During the 1970s, field biologists grew more and more worried by population drops in thousands of species and by the loss of ecosystems of all kinds around the world. Tropical rainforests were falling to saw and torch. Wetlands were being drained for agriculture. Coral reefs were dying from god knows what. Ocean fish stocks were crashing. Elephants, rhinos, gorillas, tigers, polar bears, and other “charismatic megafauna” were being slaughtered.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Record and Causes of Late Triassic Extinctions
    Earth-Science Reviews 65 (2004) 103–139 www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Assessing the record and causes of Late Triassic extinctions L.H. Tannera,*, S.G. Lucasb, M.G. Chapmanc a Departments of Geography and Geoscience, Bloomsburg University, Bloomsburg, PA 17815, USA b New Mexico Museum of Natural History, 1801 Mountain Rd. N.W., Albuquerque, NM 87104, USA c Astrogeology Team, U.S. Geological Survey, 2255 N. Gemini Rd., Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA Abstract Accelerated biotic turnover during the Late Triassic has led to the perception of an end-Triassic mass extinction event, now regarded as one of the ‘‘big five’’ extinctions. Close examination of the fossil record reveals that many groups thought to be affected severely by this event, such as ammonoids, bivalves and conodonts, instead were in decline throughout the Late Triassic, and that other groups were relatively unaffected or subject to only regional effects. Explanations for the biotic turnover have included both gradualistic and catastrophic mechanisms. Regression during the Rhaetian, with consequent habitat loss, is compatible with the disappearance of some marine faunal groups, but may be regional, not global in scale, and cannot explain apparent synchronous decline in the terrestrial realm. Gradual, widespread aridification of the Pangaean supercontinent could explain a decline in terrestrial diversity during the Late Triassic. Although evidence for an impact precisely at the boundary is lacking, the presence of impact structures with Late Triassic ages suggests the possibility of bolide impact-induced environmental degradation prior to the end-Triassic. Widespread eruptions of flood basalts of the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (CAMP) were synchronous with or slightly postdate the system boundary; emissions of CO2 and SO2 during these eruptions were substantial, but the contradictory evidence for the environmental effects of outgassing of these lavas remains to be resolved.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Catastrophic Risks 2017 INTRODUCTION
    Global Catastrophic Risks 2017 INTRODUCTION GLOBAL CHALLENGES ANNUAL REPORT: GCF & THOUGHT LEADERS SHARING WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ON GLOBAL CATASTROPHIC RISKS 2017 The views expressed in this report are those of the authors. Their statements are not necessarily endorsed by the affiliated organisations or the Global Challenges Foundation. ANNUAL REPORT TEAM Carin Ism, project leader Elinor Hägg, creative director Julien Leyre, editor in chief Kristina Thyrsson, graphic designer Ben Rhee, lead researcher Erik Johansson, graphic designer Waldemar Ingdahl, researcher Jesper Wallerborg, illustrator Elizabeth Ng, copywriter Dan Hoopert, illustrator CONTRIBUTORS Nobuyasu Abe Maria Ivanova Janos Pasztor Japanese Ambassador and Commissioner, Associate Professor of Global Governance Senior Fellow and Executive Director, C2G2 Japan Atomic Energy Commission; former UN and Director, Center for Governance and Initiative on Geoengineering, Carnegie Council Under-Secretary General for Disarmament Sustainability, University of Massachusetts Affairs Boston; Global Challenges Foundation Anders Sandberg Ambassador Senior Research Fellow, Future of Humanity Anthony Aguirre Institute Co-founder, Future of Life Institute Angela Kane Senior Fellow, Vienna Centre for Disarmament Tim Spahr Mats Andersson and Non-Proliferation; visiting Professor, CEO of NEO Sciences, LLC, former Director Vice chairman, Global Challenges Foundation Sciences Po Paris; former High Representative of the Minor Planetary Center, Harvard- for Disarmament Affairs at the United Nations Smithsonian
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Extinctions: Rates and Processes
    Extinction: a natural versus human-caused process How do current extinction rates and patterns compare to historical extinctions? The Meaning of Extinct • A species is extinct when no member of the species remains alive anywhere in the world. • A species is extinct in the wild if it is only alive in captivity • A species is locally extinct or extirpated when it is no longer found in an area it used to inhabit but is still found elsewhere • A species is ecologically extinct if it persists in such reduced numbers that its effects on other species is negligible. WHAT ARE BACKGROUND EXTINCTION RATES? • Paleontologists estimate that most species “last” 1-10 million years • If we assume there are 10 million species, 1-10 species go extinct each year (0.00001% to 0.0001% per year) • This rate could be considered a normal background rate against which to gauge mass extinctions THE FIVE MAJOR MASS EXTINCTIONS All genera Well defined genera Generaof Thousands Cretaceous–Tertiary Mass extinction event late Permian- Ordovician–Silurian Devonian Triassic Triassic- Jurassic Millions of years ago CRETACEOUS EXTINCTIONS • 50% of all genera lost, on land and sea • Demise of dinosaurs as dominant group • Impact of extraterrestrial object is the generally accepted cause THE PRESENT • Global biodiversity reached an all time high in the present geological period (about 30,000 years ago) • Biodiversity has declined ever since due to human-induced habitat loss, invasive species, and overexploitation; and is now threatened by pollution, disease, and climate change Our ancestors were hunters & gatherers and not a threat to other species.
    [Show full text]
  • The Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology and Palaeoenvironmental Analysis of Mass Extinction Events
    Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 232 (2006) 190–213 www.elsevier.com/locate/palaeo The palaeoclimatology, palaeoecology and palaeoenvironmental analysis of mass extinction events Richard J. Twitchett School of Earth, Ocean and Environmental Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK Received 1 December 2004; received in revised form 22 April 2005; accepted 23 May 2005 Abstract Although there is a continuum in magnitude of diversity loss between the smallest and largest biotic crisis, typically most authors refer to the largest five Phanerozoic events as bmass extinctionsQ. In the past 25 years the study of these mass extinction events has increased dramatically, with most focus being on the Cretaceous–Tertiary (K–T) event, although study of the end- Permian event (in terms of research output) is likely to surpass that of the K–T in the next few years. Many aspects of these events are still debated and there is no common cause or single set of climatic or environmental changes common to these five events, although all are associated with evidence for climatic change. The supposed extinction-causing environmental changes resulting from extraterrestrial impact are, at best, equivocal and are unlikely to have been of sufficient intensity or geographic extent to cause global extinction. The environmental consequences of rapid global warming (such as ocean stagnation, reduced upwelling and loss of surface productivity) are considered to have been particularly detrimental to the biosphere in the geological past. The first phase of the Late Ordovician event is clearly linked to rapid global cooling. Palaeoecological studies have demonstrated that feeding mechanism is a key trait that enhances survival chances, with selective detritivores and omnivores usually faring better than suspension feeders or grazers.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleozoic–Mesozoic Eustatic Changes and Mass Extinctions: New Insights from Event Interpretation
    life Article Paleozoic–Mesozoic Eustatic Changes and Mass Extinctions: New Insights from Event Interpretation Dmitry A. Ruban K.G. Razumovsky Moscow State University of Technologies and Management (the First Cossack University), Zemlyanoy Val Street 73, 109004 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] Received: 2 November 2020; Accepted: 13 November 2020; Published: 14 November 2020 Abstract: Recent eustatic reconstructions allow for reconsidering the relationships between the fifteen Paleozoic–Mesozoic mass extinctions (mid-Cambrian, end-Ordovician, Llandovery/Wenlock, Late Devonian, Devonian/Carboniferous, mid-Carboniferous, end-Guadalupian, end-Permian, two mid-Triassic, end-Triassic, Early Jurassic, Jurassic/Cretaceous, Late Cretaceous, and end-Cretaceous extinctions) and global sea-level changes. The relationships between eustatic rises/falls and period-long eustatic trends are examined. Many eustatic events at the mass extinction intervals were not anomalous. Nonetheless, the majority of the considered mass extinctions coincided with either interruptions or changes in the ongoing eustatic trends. It cannot be excluded that such interruptions and changes could have facilitated or even triggered biodiversity losses in the marine realm. Keywords: biotic crisis; global sea level; life evolution 1. Introduction During the whole Phanerozoic, mass extinctions stressed the marine biota many times. They triggered disappearances of numerous species, genera, families, and even high-order groups of marine organisms, and they were often associated with outstanding environmental catastrophes such as global events of anoxia and euxinia, unusual warming and planetary-scale glaciations, massive volcanism, and extraterrestrial impacts. Mass extinctions were highly complex events, with the intensity amplified by the interplay among atmosphere, oceans, geologic activity, and extraterrestrial influences. The relevant knowledge is huge, and it continues to grow.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and the Ocean – What Does the Future Hold?
    Summary Climate change and the ocean – What does the future hold? Jelle Bijma, Alfred-Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany Hans-O. Pörtner, Alfred-Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany Chris Yesson, Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, UK Alex D. Rogers, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford UK Number of citations: 13 We have been taking the ocean for granted. It has been shielding us from the worst effects of accelerating climate change by absorbing excess CO2 from the atmosphere, and this has created a “deadly trio” of impacts – acidification, warming and deoxygenation – which are combining to dramatic effect on the flora and fauna of the ocean, and exacerbating the effects of other factors, such as pollution, eutrophication and overfishing. According to a flood of recent literature, most, if not all, of the Earth’s five past mass extinction events have involved at least one of these three symptoms of global carbon perturbations, all of which are present in the ocean today. More worrying still, the scale and rate of the present day carbon perturbation, and resulting ocean acidification, is unprecedented in Earth’s known history. Today’s rate of carbon release, at approximately 30 Gt of CO2 per year, is at least 10 times faster than that which preceded the last major species extinction (the Paleocene Eocene Thermal Maximum extinction, or PETM, ca. 55 million years ago), while geological records indicate that the current acidification is unparalleled in at least the last 300 million years. We are entering an unknown territory of marine ecosystem change, and exposing organisms to intolerable evolutionary pressure.
    [Show full text]
  • Causes of the Quaternary Megafauna Extinction Event
    March 18, 2014 Geol 105: Paleontology Causes of the Quaternary Megafauna Extinction Event Introduction From approximately 50,000 years ago to 10,000 years ago, the world’s climate changed as the Pleistocene gave way to the modern, warmer climates of the Holocene. During this same period, several of the world’s megafauna species died, marking the only mass extinction event to have occurred while humans were on the planet (Barnosky, 2008.) Although the Quaternary Megafauna Extinction Event is the most recent in geologic history, it has proven to be quite a puzzle for paleontologists; the exact cause for the extinctions is a mystery. Several hypothesis have been developed in an attempt to find the cause for the mass extinctions, resulting in two widely accepted theories: The Overkill Hypothesis and the Climate Change Hypothesis (Haynes, 2008; Hubbe, 2013; Mann, 2013; Woodman, 2009.) The Overkill Hypothesis claims that the spread and growth of human populations and their subsequent overhunting caused the deaths of the megafauna. This theory is supported by the alignment of human arrival dates and locations with megafauna extinction dates and locations, stone tools and other artifacts used for hunting and butchering, and the prolong survival of megafaunal in areas absent of humans (Barnosky, 2008; Fillios, 2010; Turney, 2008; Veltre, 2008; White, 2013). The opposing theory – The Climate Change Hypothesis – claims that the changing climate of the Pleistocene-Holocene transition is to blame for the demise of the megafauna. This theory is supported by the dates and locations of climate swings and shifts, evidence for altered paleoecosystems and paleohabitats, and the relationship between severe climate changes and severe extinction events (Haynes, 2008; Hubbe, 2013; Mann, 2013; Nikolskiy, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Eldridge, the Sixth Extinction
    The Sixth Extinction (ActionBioscience) Page 1 of 6 biodiversity environment genomics biotechnology evolution new frontiers educator resources home search topic directory e-newsletter your feedback contact us The Sixth Extinction Niles Eldredge An ActionBioscience.org original article »en español articlehighlights Can we stop the devastation of our planet and save our own species? We are in a biodiversity crisis — the fastest mass extinction in Earth’s history, largely due to: z human destruction of ecosystems z overexploitation of species and natural resources z human overpopulation z the spread of agriculture z pollution June 2001 There is little doubt left in the minds of professional biologists that Earth is currently faced with a mounting loss of species that threatens to rival the five About 30,000 great mass extinctions of the geological species go past. As long ago as 1993, Harvard extinct annually. biologist E.O. Wilson estimated that Earth is currently losing something on the order of 30,000 species per year — which breaks down to the even more daunting Tyrannosaurus rex skull and upper vertebral column, a victim of the fifth major extinction. Palais de la statistic of some three species per hour. Découverte, Paris, photo by David.Monniaux. Some biologists have begun to feel that this biodiversity crisis — this “Sixth Extinction” — is even more severe, and more imminent, than Wilson had supposed. Extinction in the past The major global biotic turnovers were all caused by physical events that lay outside the normal climatic and other physical disturbances which species, and entire ecosystems, experience and survive. What caused them? z First major extinction (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Sea-Level Falls in the Permian-Triassic Transition in the Ziyun Area, South China
    GEOLOGICAL JOURNAL Geol. J. 45: 170–185 (2010) Published online 21 July 2009 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/gj.1168 Evidence for sea-level falls in the Permian-Triassic transition in the Ziyun area, South China WU YA-SHENG*, JIANG HONG-XIA and FAN JIA-SONG Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China The sedimentology of three sections showing the Permian–Triassic (P–T) transition on an Upper Permian reef in Ziyun, Guizhou Province, southwest China provides evidence of sea-level fall in this area. The P–T transition in the Gendan section, which covers a reef-front sequence, contains a subaerial exposure surface and various desiccation cracks (including rolled-up chips, in-chip cracks, pyramid cracks, vertical cracks and sheet cracks), indicating sea-level falls. The P–T transition in the Shitouzhai section, which covers a reef-core sequence, contains three micritic beds with abundant pseudomorphs of tabular gypsum crystals replaced by calcite. The underlying centimetres of deposits are composed of fine-crystalline dolostone, and have a sharp contact with the underlying reef-core facies. The association of gypsum pseudomorphs and fine-crystalline dolostone suggests an origin related to a supratidal evaporative environment. The P–T transition in the Tanluzhai section, which covers a back-reef sequence, is fine-crystalline dolostone, and shows a laminated algal structure indicating tidal- flat environments. The middle part of the dolostone interval has become a collapse breccia composed of dolostone fragments and a matrix of micrites or crustose multi-generation calcite cements. The formation of the collapse breccia is interpreted to be related to the dissolution of the evaporite interbeds originally present between the thin dolostone beds.
    [Show full text]