DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BIBLIOGRAPHY Ancient Sources Apuleius Peri Hermeneias. In The Logic of Apuleius. Including a Complete Latin Text and English Translation of the Peri Hermeneias of Apuleius of Madaura. By David Londey and Carmen Johanson. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1987. Aristotle Opera. Edited by Immanuel Bekker. Revised Edition by Olof Gigon. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1960. Categ. Categories and De Interpretatione. Translated with Notes by John L. Ackrill. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1963. Metaph. Metaphysics. Edited by W. David Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924. Metaphysics. Books G, D, E. Translated with Notes by Christopher Kirwan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971. Phys. Physics. Edited by W. David Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1936. Physics. Books I and II. Translated with Introduction and Notes by William Charlton. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1970. Augustine CA Contra Academicos. Edited by William M. Green. Corpus Christianorum Series Latina 29. Turnhout: Brepols, 1970. Answer to Sceptics. Translated by Denis J. Kavanagh. The Fathers of the Church 5. New York: CIMA Publishing, 1948. Conf. Confessiones. Edited by Martin Skutella. Leipzig: Teubner, 1934. Confessions. Translated by Henry Chadwick. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991. DBV De Beata Vita. Edited by William M. Green. Corpus Christianorum Series Latina 29. Turnhout: Brepols, 1970. The Happy Life. Translated by Ludwig Schopp. New York: CIMA Publishing, 1948. DCD De Civitate Dei. Edited by Bernhard Dombart and Alfons Kalb. Corpus Christianorum Series Latina 47–48. Turnhout: Brepols, 1955. The City of God Against the Pagans. Translated by George E. McCracken, William M. Green, David S. Wiesen, Philip Levine, Eva M. Sanford, William C. Greene. Loeb Classical Library 411–416. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1957–60. DDC De Doctrina Christiana. Edited by Joseph Martin. Corpus Christianorum Series Latina 32. Turnhout: Brepols, 1962. DDQ De Diversis Quaestionibus LXXXIII, qu. 46. Edited by A. Mutzenbecher. Corpus Christianorum Series Latina 44A. Turnhout: Brepols, 1975. Eighty-Three Different Questions. Translated by David L. Mosher. The Fathers of the Church 70. Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 1982. DGM De Genesi Contra Manichaeos. Edited by Dorothea Weber. Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum 91. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1998. Stephen Gersh - 9789047409694 Downloaded from Brill.com09/29/2021 10:53:47PM via free access 198 bibliography Two Books on Genesis Against the Manichaeans. Translated by Roland J. Teske. The Fathers of the Church 84. Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 1990. DIA De Immortalitate Animi. Edited by Wolfgang Hörmann. Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorm 89. Wien: Hoelder-Pichler-Tempsky, 1986. The Immortality of the Soul. Translated by Ludwig Schopp. The Fathers of the Church 4. Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 1947. Dial. De Dialectica. Edited by Jan Pinborg. Translated by B. Darrell Jackson. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1975. DLA De Libero Arbitrio. Edited by William M. Green. Corpus Christianorum Series Latina 29. Turnhout: Brepols, 1970. On Free Will. Translated by John H.S. Burleigh. The Library of Christian Classics. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1953. DM De Moribus Ecclesiae Catholicae et De Moribus Manichaeorum. Edited by Johannes B. Bauer. Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum 90. Wien: Hoelder-Pichler- Tempsky, 1992. The Catholic and Manichaean Ways of Life. Translated by Donald A, Gallagher and Idella J. Gallagher. The Fathers of the Church 56. Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 1966. DQA De Quantitate Animae. Edited by Wolfgang Hörmann. Corpus Scriptorum Eccle- siasticorum Latinorum 89. Wien: Hoelder-Pichler-Tempsky, 1986. The Magnitude of the Soul. Translated by John J. McMahon. The Fathers of the Church 4. Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 1947. DVR De Vera Religione. Edited by Klaus D. Daur. Corpus Christianorum Series Latina 32. Turnhout: Brepols, 1962. On True Religion Translated by John H.S. Burleigh. The Library of Christian Classics. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1953. Mag. De Magistro. Edited by William M. Green. Corpus Christianorum Series Latina 29. Turnhout: Brepols, 1970. The Teacher. Translated by John H.S. Burleigh. The Library of Christian Classics. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1953. Mus. De Musica. Patrologia Latina 32. Paris, 1841. On Music. Translated by Robert Catesby Taliaferro. The Fathers of the Church 4. Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 1947. Ord. De Ordine. Edited by William M. Green. Corpus Christianorum Series Latina 29. Turnhout: Brepols, 1970. Divine Providence and the Problem of Evil. Translated by Robert P. Russell. The Fathers of the Church 5. New York: CIMA Publishing, 1948. Retr. Retractationes. Edited by Pius Knöll. Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum 36. Wien-Leipzig, 1902. The Retractations. Translated by Mary Inez Bogan. The Fathers of the Church 60. Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 1968. Sol. Soliloquia. Edited by Wolfgang Hörmann. Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum 89. Wien: Hoelder-Pichler-Tempsky, 1986. Soliloquies. Translated by Thomas Gilligan. The Fathers of the Church 5. New York: CIMA Publishing, 1948. Trin. De Trinitate. Edited by William J. Mountain and François Glorie. Corpus Christianorum Series Latina 50–50A. Turnhout: Brepols, 1968. The Trinity. Translated by Stephen McKenna. The Fathers of the Church 45. Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 1963. Berthold of Moosburg Exp. Expositio super Elementationem Theologicam Procli: Prologus, Propositiones 1–13. Edited by Maria Rita Pagnoni-Sturlese and Loris Sturlese. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1984. Stephen Gersh - 9789047409694 Downloaded from Brill.com09/29/2021 10:53:47PM via free access bibliography 199 Cicero DO De Oratore. In M. Tullii Ciceronis Rhetorica. Edited by A.S. Wilkins. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1902. De Oratore, etc. Translated by Edward W. Sutton and Harris Rackham. Loeb Classical Library 348–9. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1988. Orat. Orator. In M. Tullii Ciceronis Rhetorica. Edited by A.S. Wilkins. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1902. Brutus and Orator. Translated by George L. Hendrickson and Harry M. Hubbell. Loeb Classical Library 342. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1952. TD Tusculanae Disputationes. Edited by Max Pohlenz. Leipzig: Teubner, 1912. Tusculan Disputations. Translated by James E. King. Loeb Classical Library 141. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1971. Damascius DS Dubitationes et Solutiones de Primis Principiis. Traité des premiers principes. Edited by Leendert G. Westerink and Joseph Combès. 3 vols. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1986–91. ps.-Dionysius. DN De Divinis Nominibus. In Corpus Dionysiacum I. Edited by Beata Regina Suchla. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter, 1990. Epist. Epistulae. In Corpus Dionysiacum II. Edited by Gunter Heil and Adolf M. Ritter. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter, 1991. MT De Mystica Theologia. In Corpus Dionysiacum II. Edited by Gunter Heil and Adolf M. Ritter Berlin: De Gruyter, 1991. Pseudo-Dionysius. The Complete Works. Translated by Colm Luibheid. New York and Mahwah: Paulist Press, 1987. Iamblichus Myst. De Mysteriis Aegyptorum. Les mystères d’Égypte. Edited by Édouard des Places. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1966. Irenaeus AH Adversus Haereses. Contre les hérésies, Livre I. Édition critique par Adelin Rousseau et Louis Doutreleau. Paris: Cerf, 1979. Macrobius Sat. Saturnalia. Edited by James Willis. Leipzig: Teubner, 1963. The Saturnalia. Translated by Percival Vaughan Davies. New York: Columbia University Press, 1969. Plato Platonis Opera. Edited by John Burnet. 5 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1899–1907. Phaedr. Phaedrus. In Platonis Opera. Vol. 2. Edited by John Burnet. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1901. Translated by R. Hackforth. In Plato. The Collected Dialogues. Edited by Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns. New York: Random House, 1961. Rep. Res Publica. In Platonis Opera. Vol. 4. Edited by John Burnet. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1902. Translated by Paul Shorey. In Plato. The Collected Dialogues. Edited by Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns. New York: Random House, 1961. Stephen Gersh - 9789047409694 Downloaded from Brill.com09/29/2021 10:53:47PM via free access 200 bibliography Theaet. Theaetetus. In Platonis Opera. Vol. 1. Edited by John Burnet. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1900. Tim. Timaeus. In Platonis Opera. Vol. 4. Edited by John Burnet. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1902. Translated by Francis MacDonald Cornford in Plato’s Cosmology. The Timaeus of Plato Translated with a Running Commentary. London: Kegan Paul, 1937. Plotinus Enn. Enneades. In Plotini Opera. Edited by Paul Henry and Hans-Rudolph Schwyzer. Bruxelles: Édition Universelle, Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1951–73. Porphyry Sententiae ad intelligibilia ducentes. Edited by Erich Lamberz. Leipzig: Teubner, 1975. Proclus CCrat. In Platonis Cratylum Commentaria. Edited by Georgius Pasquali. Leipzig: Teubner, 1908. CEucl. In primum Euclidis Elementorum librum Commentarii. Edited by Gottfried Friedlein. Leipzig: Teubner, 1873. A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements. Translated by Glenn R. Morrow. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970. CParm. Commentarius in Parmenidem. Edited by Victor Cousin. Paris, 1864. Reprinted Hildesheim: Olms, 1961. Plato Latinus III. Parmenides usque ad Wnem primae hypothesis necnon Procli Commentarium
Recommended publications
  • | Society for Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy

    | Society for Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy

    SOCIETY FOR PHENOMENOLOGY AND EXISTENTIAL PHILOSOPHY Executive Co-Directors Brian Schroeder, Rochester Institute of Technology Alia Al-Saji, McGill University Executive Committee Brian Schroeder, Rochester Institute of Technology Alia Al-Saji, McGill University Amy Allen, Pennsylvania State University Dermot Moran, University College Dublin Alan D. Schrift, Grinnell College Emily Zakin, Miami University Ohio, Secretary-Treasurer Graduate Assistant Jessica Ryan Sims, Stony Brook University Advisory Book Selection Committee Jason M. Wirth, Seattle University, Chair Megan Craig, Stony Brook University Bret W. Davis, Loyola University Maryland Samir Haddad, Fordham University Sebastian Luft, Marquette University Ladelle McWhorter, University of Richmond Eduardo Mendieta, Pennsylvania State University Elaine P. Miller, Miami University Ohio Annika Thiem, Villanova University Advocacy Committee Mary Beth Mader, University of Memphis, Chair John Protevi, Louisiana State University Kathryn T. Gines, Pennsylvania State University Committee on the Status of Women Pleshette DeArmitt, University of Memphis, Chair (†) Elaine P. Miller, Miami University Ohio, Chair Rocío Zambrana, University of Oregon Mariana Ortega, John Carroll University Racial and Ethnic Diversity Committee Kris Sealey, Fairfield University, Chair Dilek Huseyinzadegan, Emory University Camisha Russell, University of California Irvine LGBTQ Advocacy Committee Jami Weinstein, Linköping University, Chair Emanuela Bianchi, New York University Ronald R. Sundstrom, University of San Francisco Webmaster Christopher P. Long, Pennsylvania State University Local Arrangements Contacts Andrew J. Mitchell, Emory University, local contact and organizer Noëlle McAfee and Cynthia Willett, Emory University, book exhibit coordinators SPEP Graduate Assistants Jessica Ryan Sims, Stony Brook University Eric Murphy, McGill University, incoming assistant All sessions will be held at the Atlanta Marriott Buckhead Hotel and Conference Center, located at 3405 Lenox Road NE, Atlanta, GA, 30326.
  • The Unlimited Responsibility of Spilling Ink Marko Zlomislic

    The Unlimited Responsibility of Spilling Ink Marko Zlomislic

    ISSN 1393-614X Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 11 (2007): 128-152 ____________________________________________________ The Unlimited Responsibility of Spilling Ink Marko Zlomislic Abstract In order to show that both Derrida’s epistemology and his ethics can be understood in terms of his logic of writing and giving, I consider his conversation with Searle in Limited Inc. I bring out how a deconstruction that is implied by the dissemination of writing and giving makes a difference that accounts for the creative and responsible decisions that undecidability makes possible. Limited Inc has four parts and I will interpret it in terms of the four main concepts of Derrida. I will relate signature, event, context to Derrida’s notion of dissemination and show how he differs from Austin and Searle concerning the notion of the signature of the one who writes and gives. Next, I will show how in his reply to Derrida, entitled, “Reiterating the Differences”, Searle overlooks Derrida’s thought about the communication of intended meaning that has to do with Derrida’s distinction between force and meaning and his notion of differance. Here I will show that Searle cannot even follow his own criteria for doing philosophy. Then by looking at Limited Inc, I show how Derrida differs from Searle because repeatability is alterability. Derrida has an ethical intent all along to show that it is the ethos of alterity that is called forth by responsibility and accounted for by dissemination and difference. Of course, comments on comments, criticisms of criticisms, are subject to the law of diminishing fleas, but I think there are here some misconceptions still to be cleared up, some of which seem to still be prevalent in generally sensible quarters.
  • Metaphysics Today and Tomorrow*

    Metaphysics Today and Tomorrow*

    1 Metaphysics Today and Tomorrow* Raphaël Millière École normale supérieure, Paris – October 2011 Translated by Mark Ohm with the assistance of Leah Orth, Jon Cogburn, and Emily Beck Cogburn “By metaphysics, I do not mean those abstract considerations of certain imaginary properties, the principal use of which is to furnish the wherewithal for endless dispute to those who want to dispute. By this science I mean the general truths which can serve as principles for the particular sciences.” Malebranche Dialogues on Metaphysics and Religion 1. The interminable agony of metaphysics Throughout the twentieth century, numerous philosophers sounded the death knell of metaphysics. Ludwig Wittgenstein, Rudolf Carnap, Martin Heidegger, Gilbert Ryle, J. L. Austin, Jacques Derrida, Jürgen Habermas, Richard Rorty, and, henceforth, Hilary Putnam: a great many tutelary figures have extolled the rejection, the exceeding, the elimination, or the deconstruction of first philosophy. All these necrological chronicles do not have the same radiance, the same seriousness, nor the same motivations, but they all agree to dismiss the discipline, which in the past was considered “the queen of the sciences”, with a violence at times comparable to the prestige it commanded at the time of its impunity. Even today, certain philosophers hastily spread the tragic news with contempt for philosophical inquiry, as if its grave solemnity bestowed upon it some obviousness. Thus, Franco Volpi writes: ‘Grand metaphysics is dead!’ is the slogan which applies to the majority of contemporary philosophers, whether continentals or of analytic profession. They all treat metaphysics as a dead dog.1 In this way, the “path of modern thought” would declare itself vociferously “anti- metaphysical and finally post-metaphysical”.
  • Kant Et L'humain

    Kant Et L'humain

    KANT ET L’HUMAIN GÉOGRAPHIE, PSYCHOLOGIE, ANTHROPOLOGIE À LA MÊME LIBRAIRIE Années 1747-1781. Kant. Avant la Critique de la raison pure, sous la direction de Luc Langlois, 352 p., 2009. L’année 1790. Kant. Critique de la faculté de juger. Beauté, vie, liberté, sous la direction de Christophe Bouton, Fabienne Brugère et Claudie Lavaud, 352 p., 2008. L’année 1793. Kant. Sur la politique et la religion, sous la direction de Jean Ferrari, 272 p., 1995. L’année 1795. Kant. Essai sur la paix, sous la direction de Pierre Laberge, Guy Lafrance et Denis Dumas, 406 p., 1997. L’année 1796. Kant. Sur la paix perpétuelle. De Leibniz aux héritiers de Kant, sous la direction de Simone Goyard-Fabre et Jean Ferrari, 216 p., 1998. L’année 1797. Kant. La métaphysique des mœurs, sous la direction de Simone Goyard- Fabre et Jean Ferrari, 144 p., 2000. L’année 1798. Kant. Sur l’anthropologie, sous la direction de Jean Ferrari, 224 p., 1997. Années 1796-1803. Kant. Opus postumum. Philosophie, science, éthique et théologie, sous la direction de Ingeborg Schüssler, édité par Christophe Erismann, 246 p., 2001. Années 1781-1801. Kant. Critique de la raison pure. Vingt ans de réception, sous la direction de Claude Piché, 288 p., 2002. Kant. Les sources de la philosophie kantienne aux XVII e et XVIII e siècles, sous la direction de Lukas K. Sosoe et Robert Theis, 384 p., 2005. Kant et les Lumières européennes, sous la direction de Lorenzo Bianchi, Jean Ferrari et Alberto Postigliola, 374 p., 2009. Kant et Wolff. Héritages et ruptures, sous la direction de Sophie Grapotte et Tinca Prunea-Bretonnet, 236 p., 2011.
  • 1 Political Dilemmas Angel R. Oquendo

    1 Political Dilemmas Angel R. Oquendo

    1 Political Dilemmas Angel R. Oquendo* I. Introductory Comments II. The Appeal of a Perfectly Coherent System of Principles III. Biting the Bullet: Confronting Political Dilemmas IV. Three Examples: Orangemen, Quebec Anglophones, and Surrogate Mothers V. Counter Reflections I. Introductory Comments Fundamental principles, such as those of democracy and human rights, are sometimes dramatically at odds with each other. It is a mistake to regard these cases as involving only apparent conflicts, which vanish upon closer inspection. One must instead acknowledge that the two norms at issue clash in the specific context and that opting for one over another will produce a real sense of loss, even if the choice is correct. The community will come to regret not its endorsement of the prevailing principle, but rather * Law Professor at the University of Connecticut School of Law. A.B., M.A., Ph.D., Harvard University; J.D., Yale University. I would like to thank Luiz Bernardo Araújo, Maria Clara Dias, Eduardo Fermandois, Donald Ipperciel, Luc Langlois, Wilson Mendonça, Claude Piché, Alan Ritter, Shaina Spreng, Mauricio Suárez, Daniel Löwe, and Jorge Vergara for their comments and suggestions on earlier drafts. I have provided my own translation of the non-English quotations. 2 its neglect of the alternative. It will have to make amends vis-à-vis the individuals or groups it has let down in the process. Thus, the notion of an irreducible dilemma, which Bernard Williams invokes in his discussions on morality,1 applies with equal force in the realm of political philosophy. This kind of predicament brings about extensive collective pain, and at times even tragedy.
  • PHI 516/GER 566/REL 516 Special Topics In

    PHI 516/GER 566/REL 516 Special Topics In

    PHI 516/GER 566/REL 516 Special Topics in History of Phil: Knowledge & Belief in Kant, Fichte, Hegel Instructor: Andrew Chignell ([email protected]) Spring 2020, Marx 201, Th 1:30-4:20 Office: 232 1879 Hall; Office Hours: Tues 4-5:30 and by appt A seminar on Kantian epistemology and pistology (the theory of faith or acceptance). Topics include: the nature and ethics of assent (holding-for-true); the nature of knowledge; fallibilism and infallibilism about epistemic justification; cognition and spontaneity; noumenal ignorance; opinion and common sense; epistemic autonomy; and the structure of practical arguments, both pragmatic and moral. In the final weeks of the seminar we will consider how some of these themes are treated by two of Kant’s most influential successors – J.G. Fichte and G.W.F. Hegel. Along the way, we will look at some broadly Kantian efforts in contemporary epistemology by authors like Mark Schroeder and Kurt Sylvan. Assignments: 1. Short reflections: Everyone taking the course for credit is asked to submit five 1-2 page reflections. Often these will simply elaborate a question about the reading, but they can also involve criticism or constructive work. These are due on Wednesday night before class at 11.59pm, and should focus on the readings for the following day’s class. Graded on a satisfactory/unsatisfactory basis, they are worth (combined) 30% of the grade. As long as you’re doing the required reading, it shouldn’t be hard to achieve full credit for this. 2. Presentation: Ph.D. students have the opportunity (but not the obligation) to give a short presentation to the seminar.
  • Thinking the Concept Otherwise: Deleuze and Expression

    Thinking the Concept Otherwise: Deleuze and Expression

    Thinking the Concept Otherwise: Deleuze and Expression PETER COOK University o/Sydney ABSTRACT: In What is Philosophy?, Deleuze and Guattari think the concept of concept otherwise. In keeping with Deleuze 's professed empiricism, he and Guattari study various concepts and 'extract' a new concept ofthe concept. This constructive method does not illuminate how and why their proposed concept diffors from the traditional. This paper considers how Deleuze and Guattari 's concept does differ, as afirst step towards arriving at some evaluation oftheir analysis. REsUME: Dans Qu' est-ce que la philosophie?, Deleuze et Guattari pensent Ie concept autrement. Tout en s 'en tenant aI 'empirisme avoue de Deleuze, ce dernier et Guattari analysent differents concepts et en 'extraient' un nouveau concept de concept. Cette methode constructive n 'eclaire cependant pas comment et pourquoi Ie concept qu 'ils proposent di.ffere du concept traditionnel. Apres avoir considere la faryon dont Ie concept de Deleuze et Guattari di.ffere en effit de l'acception traditionnelle, cet article pourra se pencher sur la question de I 'evaluation de leur analyse. " ... one can ... think ... the concept of concept otherwise ... "l In What is Philosophy?, Deleuze and Guattari think the concept of concept otherwise. In keeping with Deleuze's professed empiricism, he and Guattari study various concepts and 'extract' a new concept of the concept. This constructive method does not illuminate how and why their proposed concept differs from the traditional. In this paper I consider how Deleuze and Guattari's concept does differ, as a first step towards arriving at some evaluation of their analysis.
  • Political Animals Geoffrey Bennington, Emory University

    Political Animals Geoffrey Bennington, Emory University

    Political Animals Geoffrey Bennington, Emory University Journal Title: Diacritics Volume: Volume 39, Number 2 Publisher: Johns Hopkins University Press | 2009, Pages 21-35 Type of Work: Article | Final Publisher PDF Publisher DOI: 10.1353/dia.2009.0015 Permanent URL: http://pid.emory.edu/ark:/25593/ckwxz Final published version: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/diacritics/v039/39.2.bennington.html Copyright information: © 2012 by the Johns Hopkins University Press Accessed September 30, 2021 1:49 PM EDT Political Animals Geoffrey Bennington diacritics, Volume 39, Number 2, Summer 2009, pp. 21-35 (Article) Published by The Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: 10.1353/dia.2009.0015 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/dia/summary/v039/39.2.bennington.html Access Provided by Emory University Libraries at 10/24/12 4:52PM GMT Political animals GEOFFREY BENNINGTON in this essay, as my title might already suggest, i want to look again at a very famous pas- sage from the opening of aristotle’s Politics (indeed one of the most famous passages in all Western philosophy), according to which man is by nature a political animal and is so, more at any rate than some other political animals, because he, and he alone, is an animal possessed of logos. more especially, i want to look at this passage in the light of more or less recent readings of it offered by lyotard (especially) and Derrida (somewhat). in passing, i’ll also look at what is a little less obviously a reading of this passage in aris- totle, in Hobbes’s chapter “of commonwealth,” that opens part 2 of the Leviathan.
  • Derridean Deconstruction and Feminism

    Derridean Deconstruction and Feminism

    DERRIDEAN DECONSTRUCTION AND FEMINISM: Exploring Aporias in Feminist Theory and Practice Pam Papadelos Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Discipline of Gender, Work and Social Inquiry Adelaide University December 2006 Contents ABSTRACT..............................................................................................................III DECLARATION .....................................................................................................IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................V INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1 THESIS STRUCTURE AND OVERVIEW......................................................................... 5 CHAPTER 1: LAYING THE FOUNDATIONS – FEMINISM AND DECONSTRUCTION ............................................................................................... 8 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 8 FEMINIST CRITIQUES OF PHILOSOPHY..................................................................... 10 Is Philosophy Inherently Masculine? ................................................................ 11 The Discipline of Philosophy Does Not Acknowledge Feminist Theories......... 13 The Concept of a Feminist Philosopher is Contradictory Given the Basic Premises of Philosophy.....................................................................................
  • Derrida and the Singularity of Literature

    Derrida and the Singularity of Literature

    DERRIDA AND THE SINGULARITY OF LITERATURE Jonathan Culler* In This Strange Institution Called Literature, an interview with Derek Attridge, Jacques Derrida offers an eloquent homage to literature: Experience of Being, nothing less, nothing more, on the edge of metaphysics, literature perhaps stands on the edge of everything, almost beyond everything, including itself. It’s the most interesting thing in the world, maybe more interesting than the world, and this is why, if it has no definition, what is heralded and refused under the name of literature cannot be identified with any other discourse. It will never be scientific, philosophical, conversational.1 This is a celebration of literature of a sort not much heard these days, when advanced critical approaches treat literature as one discourse among others, to privilege which would be an elitist mistake. In fact, this celebration of literature is not a privileging of some distinctiveness of literary language or of aesthetic achievement—literature, Derrida stresses, has no definition—but it nevertheless gives an importance to literary discourse, its engagement with the world, on the edge of the world, and the engagement that it calls forth in readers, which has the possibility to transform our literary culture. In a new book The Singularity of Literature, which is largely inspired by Derrida, Derek Attridge writes, “Derrida’s work over the past thirty-five years constitutes the most significant, far-reaching, and inventive exploration of literature for our time.”2 This is unmistakably true, though it is not widely recognized. One of the more grotesque aspects of the mediatic reception of Derrida in the United States is the idea that somehow Derrida’s work and deconstruction generally have constituted an attack on literature.
  • PHIL 463/563 Author: Jacques DERRIDA Fall 2016 Instructor

    PHIL 463/563 Author: Jacques DERRIDA Fall 2016 Instructor

    PHIL 463/563 Author: Jacques DERRIDA Fall 2016 Instructor: Professor Beata Stawarska Noon - 1:50pm, T & TH, 250C SCH Office Hours: T 2-3:50pm & by appointment Office: SCH 247 E-mail: [email protected] Description This class surveys representative works by the contemporary Algerian-Jewish-French philosopher Jacques Derrida (1930-2004). We will focus especially on the tasks and methods of deconstruction, which is first and foremost a style of reading texts attending to their logical and rhetorical dimensions. A related focus will be on Derrida’s critique of Western metaphysics of presence with its set of violent and vertical dichotomies such as interiority and exteriority, speech and writing, male and female, self and other, and on his attempt to thematize difference in a more complex, dynamic, and non-hierarchical manner – both at the level of theory and practice. These two main foci determine the design of this class, which examines Derrida’s deconstructive reading of Husserl’s phenomenology of consciousness with its commitment to the primacy of sound and/or voice (The Voice and Phenomena); Plato’s Phaedrus and the undecidable status of writing as a pharmakon (remedy and/or poison) (Dissemination); and J. L. Austin’s and John Searle’s speech acts theory and its conception of the performative (Limited Inc). We will then address Derrida’s more recent, socially and politically situated work, especially the question of sexual difference and feminism (select essays from Psyche), of an indeconstructible and other- oriented justice (‘Force of Law: the Mystical Foundation of Authority’), and of linguistic and cultural identity within a post-colonial context (Monolingualism of the Other).
  • Curriculum Vitae Peggy Kamuf

    Curriculum Vitae Peggy Kamuf

    Kamuf Vita, 1 CURRICULUM VITAE PEGGY KAMUF Department of French and Italian University of Southern California University Park Los Angeles, CA 90089-0359 Tel.: 213-740-0101 Fax : 213-740-8058 email: [email protected] • EDUCATION B.A., French and English, Bucknell University, 1969 Ph.D., Romance Studies, Cornell University, 1975 • UNIVERSITY APPOINTMENTS 1975-80: Assistant Professor of French, Miami University. 1980-88: Associate Professor of French, Miami University. 1987-88: Visiting Associate Professor of Literature, University of California, San Diego 1988- : Professor of French, University of Southern California 1989-95: Directeur de Programme Correspondant, Collège International de Philosophie (concurrent appointment) 1991- : Professor of Comparative Literature, University of Southern California (joint appointment) 1998: Visiting Professor, Centre d’Etudes Féminines, Université de Paris 8, Vincennes- St. Denis 2001-2003: Guest Professor, Department of French, University of Nottingham, England 2001- Marion Frances Chevalier Professor of French, University of Southern California (named professorship) 2006: Visiting Professor, Centre d’Etudes Féminines, Université de Paris 8, Vincennes- St. Denis 2010- Distinguished International Fellow, London Graduate School, London, England 2015- Distinguished Visting Professor, Kingston University, London, England • GRANTS AND HONORS 1976: Sigma Chi Foundation Grant, Miami University 1978: American Council of Learned Societies, Research Fellowship 1980: Miami University Summer Research Grant 1983: Miami University Summer Research Grant 1991: Ida Beam Visiting Professorship, University of Iowa Kamuf Vita, 2 1995: Raubenheimer Distinguished Faculty Award, USC 1996-97: Mellon Dissertation Seminar in Literature and History (with Professor Marshall Cohen, Philosophy) 2002: Invited Senior Fellow, Society for the Humanities, Cornell University 2005: Colloquium grant, Albert and Elaine Borchard Foundation 2006: René C.