DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. Editions Perna, Petrus. 1580. Plotini platonicorum facile coryphaei operum philosophicorum omnium libri LIV: in sex enneades distributi. Basileae: Ad Perneam Lecythum. Fabricius, Johann Albert. 1711. Bibliothecae graecae libri IV. Hamburgi: [Christiani Liebezeit]. Creuzer, Georg Friedrich, Georg Heinrich Moser, and Daniel Wyttenbach. 1835. Plotini opera omnia, Porphyrii liber de vita Plotini. 3 vols. Oxonii: e typographaeo Academico. Westermann, Anton. 1850. Porphyrius De vita Plotini apud Carel Gabriel Cobet, Diogenis Laertii de clarorum philosophorum vitis, dogmatibus et apophthegmatibus libri decem. Paris: Firmin Didot. Kirchhoff, Adolf. 1856. Plotini opera. 2 vols. Bibl. Teubneriana. Lipsiae: in aedibus B. G. Teubneri. Müller, Hermann Friedrich. 1878-80. Plotini Enneades. 2 vols. Berolini: apud Weidmannos. von Volkmann, Richard. 1883-4. Plotini Enneades, praemisso Porphyrii de vita Plotini deque ordine librorum eius libello. Bibl. Teubneriana. Lipsiae: in aedibus B. G. Teubneri. Bréhier, Émile. 1924-38. Plotin: Ennéades. 6 vols. in 7. Coll. Budé. Paris: Les Belles Lettres. Pugliese Carratelli, Giovanni. 1946. Porfirio: Vita di Plotino ed ordine dei suoi libri. Napoli: G. Machiaroli. Faggin, Giuseppe. 1947-8. Plotino: Le Enneadi e Porfirio: Vita di Plotino. 3 vols. Milano: Istituto editoriale italiano. Rev. ed. 2000, Milano: Bompiani. Henry, Paul, and Hans-Rudolf Schwyzer. 1951-73. Plotini opera. (Editio maior.) 3 vols. Museum Lessianum Series Philosophica 33-5. Bruxelles: L’Édition Universelle and Paris: Desclée de Brouwer. ———. 1964-82. Plotini opera. (Editio minor.) 3 vols. OCT. Oxonii: e typographeo Clarendoniano. Kalligas, Paul. 1991. Porphyriou: Peri tou Plōtinou biou. Vivliothēkē A. Manousē. Kentron Ekdoseōs Ergōn Ellēnōn Syngrapheōn. Athēnai: Akadēmia Athēnōn. ———. 1994. Plōtinou: Enneas Prōtē. Vivliothēkē A. Manousē. Kentron Ekdoseōs Ergōn Ellēnōn Syngrapheōn. Athēnai: Akadēmia Athēnōn. 1 For general queries, contact [email protected] © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. ———. 1997a. Plōtinou: Enneas Deutera. Vivliothēkē A. Manousē. Kentron Ekdoseōs Ergōn Ellēnōn Syngrapheōn. Athēnai: Akadēmia Athēnōn. ———. 2004a. Plōtinou: Enneas Tritē. Vivliothēkē A. Manousē. Kentron Ekdoseōs Ergōn Ellēnōn Syngrapheōn. Athēnai: Akadēmia Athēnōn. 2. Principal Translations Ficinus, Marsilius. 1492. Plotini opera. Florentiae: Antonio di Bartolommeo Misomini. Bouillet, Marie Nicolas. 1857-61. es Ennéades de Plotin: traduites pour la pre i re ois en ran ais a o pa nées de so aires de notes et d é lair isse ents et pré édées de la ie de Plotin et des prin ipes de la théorie des intelligibles de Porphyre. 3 vols. Paris: Librairie L. Hachette. Müller, Hermann Friedrich. 1878-80. Die Enneaden des Plotin. 2 vols. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung. MacKenna, Stephen. 1917. Plotinus: The ethical treatises: being the treatises of the first Ennead with Porphyry s i e o Plotinus and the Preller-Ritter extracts forming a conspectus of the Plotinian system. London: P. L. Warner, publisher to the Medici Society. ———. 1921. Plotinus: Psychic and physical treatises: comprising the second and third Enneads. P. L. Warner, publisher to the Medici Society. ———. 1924. Plotinus: On the nature of the soul: being the fourth Ennead. London and Boston: The Medici Society. ———. 1926. Plotinus: The divine mind: being the treatises of the fifth Ennead. London and Boston: The Medici Society. MacKenna, Stephen, and Bertram Samuel Page. 1930. Plotinus: On the One and Good: being the treatises of the sixth Ennead. London: The Medici Society and Boston: Hale, Cushman and Flint. MacKenna, Stephen. 1969. Plotinus: The Enneads. 4th ed. rev. by Bertram Samuel Page. London: Faber and Faber and New York: Pantheon Books. ———. 1991. Plotinus: The Enneads. Abridged with an introduction and notes by John [M.] Dillon. London, etc.: Penguin Books. 2 For general queries, contact [email protected] © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. Guthrie, Kenneth Sylvan. 1918. Plotinos: Complete Works, in Chronological Order. 4 vols. London: G. Bell and Sons, and Grantwood, N. J.: Comparative Literature Press. Bréhier, Émile (see section 1. above). Harder, Richard. 1930-7. Plotins Schriften. 5 vols. Leipzig: Meiner. ———. 1956-71. Plotins S hri ten übersetzt von Ri hard Harder: Neubearbeitung mit griechischem Lesetext und Anmerkungen. 6 vols. in 12. Vols 2-6 rev. and suppl. by Richard Beutler and Willy Theiler. Vol. 5c Appendix: Porphyrios über Plotins eben und über die Ordnung seiner S hri ten: Text Übersetzun An erkun en, ed. Walter Marg. Philosophische Bibliothek 211- 5 and 276. Hamburg: Meiner. Cilento, Vincenzo. 1947-9. Plotino: Enneadi, prima versione integra e commento. 3 vols. in 4. Bari: Laterza. Repr. 1973. Dalezios, Andreas G. 1952-4. Plōtinou Enneades I-III. Vivliothēkē “Papyrou” 172, 183 and 192. En Athēnais: Papyros. Krokiewicz, Adam. 1959. Plotinus: Enneady I-II. 2 vols. Polska Akademia Naukowe Komitet Filozoficzny. Biblioteka Klazyków Filozofii. Warszawa: Pánstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. Krokiewicz, Adam et al. 2000-3. Plotinus: Enneady I-VI. 4 vols. Biblioteka Filozofii Klasycznej. Warszawa: Akme. Armstrong, A. Hilary. 1966-88. Plotinus. 7 vols. Loeb Classical Library 440-5, 468. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press and London: Heinemann. Igal, Jesús. 1970. “Porfirio, Vida de Plotino.” Perficit 2: 281-323. ———. 1982-98. Porfirio: Vida de Plotino. Plotino: Enéadas I-VI. 3 vols. Biblioteca clásica Gredos 57, 88, 256. Madrid: Gredos. Spiegel, Nathan. 1978. Plotinus: Ene adot = Plotini Enneades [I-III], necnon Porphyrii de vita Plotini e Graeco sermone in Hebraeum. 2 vols. Jerusalem: Mosad Byalik. Ferwerda, Rein. 1984a. Plotinus: Enneaden. Porphyrius: Het leven van Plotinus. Baarn: Ambo and Amsterdam: Athenaeum – Polak & Van Gennep. Rev. ed. 2005, Budel: Damon. Tanaka, Michitarō, Muneaki Mizuchi, and Yasuhiko Tanogashira. 1986-8. Purotinosu: Zenshū. 5 vols. with index. Tokyo: Chūō Kōronsha. Kalligas, Paul (see section 1. above). 3 For general queries, contact [email protected] © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. 3. Bibliographies, Indexes and Dictionaries. Bonitz, Hermann. 1961. Index Aristotelicus. Vol. 5 of Aristotelis Opera, ed. Immanuel Bekker. Berolini: apud W. de Gruyter et socios. Orig. publ. 1870, Berolini: apud G. Reimerum. Brisson, Luc, Marie-Odile Goulet-Cazé, and Richard Goulet. 1982. “Index complet de la Vie de Plotin.” In Porphyre VP = Brisson et al. 1982-92, 1: 13-38. Dufour, Richard. 2002. Plotinus: A Bibliography 1950-2000. 2nd rev. ed. Leiden: E. J. Brill. Periodically updated online at: http://rdufour.free.fr/BibPlotin/anglais/Biblio.html. Goulet, Richard. 1982a. “Liste des auteurs et des ouvrages cités ou mentionnés dans la Vie de Plotin.” In Porphyre VP = Brisson et al. 1982-92, 1: 39-47. Lampe, Geoffrey William Hugo. 1961. A Patristic Greek Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Liddell, Henry George, Robert Scott, and Henry Stuart Jones. 1940. A Greek-English Lexicon. 9th ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Mariën, Bert. 1949. “Bibliografia critica degli studi plotiniani.” In Cilento 1947-9, 3b: 437-5. Repr. [1966] and [1973], Dubuque, Iowa: W. C. Brown Reprint Library. O’Brien, Denis. 1982a. “Une bibliographie analytique des éditions, traductions et commentaires de la Vie de Plotin.” In Porphyre VP = Brisson et al. 1982-92, 1: 143-86. Sleeman, John H., and Gilbert Pollet. 1980. Lexicon Plotinianum (=LexPlot). Leiden: E. J. Brill and Leuven: University Press. 4. General Bibliography Abramowski, Luise. 1983. “Nag Hammadi 8,1 ‘Zostrianus’, das Anonymum Brucianum, Plotin Enn. 2,9 (33).” In Fests hri t Dörrie = Blume and Mann 1983, 1-10. Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei (see: ANL). Ackrill, John Lloyd. 1972/3. “Aristotle’s Definitions of Psu hē.” PAS 73: 119-33. (Repr. in Articles on Aristotle = Barnes, Schofield and Sorabji 1975-9, vol. 4, and in Ackrill 1997, 163-78.) ———. 1974. “Aristotle on Eudaimonia.” PBA 60: 339-59. (Repr. in Ackrill 1997, 179-200) ———. 1997. Essays on Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press and New York: Oxford University Press. 4 For general queries, contact [email protected] © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. Alföldi, Andreas. 1930. “Die Vorherrschaft der Pannonier im Römerreiche und die Reaktion des Hellenentums unter Gallienus.” Fün undzwanzi Jahre Rö is h-Germanische Kommission, 11-51. Berlin and Leipzig: de Gruyter. Repr. 1967 in Studien zur Geschichte der Weltkrise des 3. Jahrhunderts nach Christus, 228-81. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. ———. 1939. “The Crisis of the Empire.” In CAH 12 = Cook et al. 1939, Ch. 6, 165-231. Alföldi, Géza. 1974. “The Crisis of the Third Century as seen by contemporaries.” GRBS 15: 89-111. Algra,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Roles of Solon in Plato's Dialogues
    The Roles of Solon in Plato’s Dialogues Dissertation Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Samuel Ortencio Flores, M.A. Graduate Program in Greek and Latin The Ohio State University 2013 Dissertation Committee: Bruce Heiden, Advisor Anthony Kaldellis Richard Fletcher Greg Anderson Copyrighy by Samuel Ortencio Flores 2013 Abstract This dissertation is a study of Plato’s use and adaptation of an earlier model and tradition of wisdom based on the thought and legacy of the sixth-century archon, legislator, and poet Solon. Solon is cited and/or quoted thirty-four times in Plato’s dialogues, and alluded to many more times. My study shows that these references and allusions have deeper meaning when contextualized within the reception of Solon in the classical period. For Plato, Solon is a rhetorically powerful figure in advancing the relatively new practice of philosophy in Athens. While Solon himself did not adequately establish justice in the city, his legacy provided a model upon which Platonic philosophy could improve. Chapter One surveys the passing references to Solon in the dialogues as an introduction to my chapters on the dialogues in which Solon is a very prominent figure, Timaeus- Critias, Republic, and Laws. Chapter Two examines Critias’ use of his ancestor Solon to establish his own philosophic credentials. Chapter Three suggests that Socrates re- appropriates the aims and themes of Solon’s political poetry for Socratic philosophy. Chapter Four suggests that Solon provides a legislative model which Plato reconstructs in the Laws for the philosopher to supplant the role of legislator in Greek thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Proclus on the Elements and the Celestial Bodies
    PROCLUS ON THE ELEMENTS AND THE CELESTIAL BODIES PHYSICAL TH UGHT IN LATE NEOPLAT NISM Lucas Siorvanes A Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy to the Dept. of History and Philosophy of Science, Science Faculty, University College London. Deuember 1986 - 2 - ABSTRACT Until recently, the period of Late Antiquity had been largely regarded as a sterile age of irrationality and of decline in science. This pioneering work, supported by first-hand study of primary sources, argues that this opinion is profoundly mistaken. It focuses in particular on Proclus, the head of the Platonic School at Athens in the 5th c. AD, and the chief spokesman for the ideas of the dominant school of thought of that time, Neoplatonism. Part I, divided into two Sections, is an introductory guide to Proclus' philosophical and cosmological system, its general principles and its graded ordering of the states of existence. Part II concentrates on his physical theories on the Elements and the celestial bodies, in Sections A and B respectively, with chapters (or sub-sections) on topics including the structure, properties and motion of the Elements; light; space and matter; the composition and motion of the celestial bodies; and the order of planets. The picture that emerges from the study is that much of the Aristotelian physics, so prevalent in Classical Antiquity, was rejected. The concepts which were developed instead included the geometrization of matter, the four-Element composition of the universe, that of self-generated, free motion in space for the heavenly bodies, and that of immanent force or power.
    [Show full text]
  • Plato As "Architectof Science"
    Plato as "Architectof Science" LEONID ZHMUD ABSTRACT The figureof the cordialhost of the Academy,who invitedthe mostgifted math- ematiciansand cultivatedpure research, whose keen intellectwas able if not to solve the particularproblem then at least to show the methodfor its solution: this figureis quite familiarto studentsof Greekscience. But was the Academy as such a centerof scientificresearch, and did Plato really set for mathemati- cians and astronomersthe problemsthey shouldstudy and methodsthey should use? Oursources tell aboutPlato's friendship or at leastacquaintance with many brilliantmathematicians of his day (Theodorus,Archytas, Theaetetus), but they were neverhis pupils,rather vice versa- he learnedmuch from them and actively used this knowledgein developinghis philosophy.There is no reliableevidence that Eudoxus,Menaechmus, Dinostratus, Theudius, and others, whom many scholarsunite into the groupof so-called"Academic mathematicians," ever were his pupilsor close associates.Our analysis of therelevant passages (Eratosthenes' Platonicus, Sosigenes ap. Simplicius, Proclus' Catalogue of geometers, and Philodemus'History of the Academy,etc.) shows thatthe very tendencyof por- trayingPlato as the architectof sciencegoes back to the earlyAcademy and is bornout of interpretationsof his dialogues. I Plato's relationship to the exact sciences used to be one of the traditional problems in the history of ancient Greek science and philosophy.' From the nineteenth century on it was examined in various aspects, the most significant of which were the historical, philosophical and methodological. In the last century and at the beginning of this century attention was paid peredominantly, although not exclusively, to the first of these aspects, especially to the questions how great Plato's contribution to specific math- ematical research really was, and how reliable our sources are in ascrib- ing to him particular scientific discoveries.
    [Show full text]
  • Corrupted Platonism in Astrophil and Stella: the Expression of Desire
    Corrupted Platonism in Astrophil and Stella: The Expression of Desire Sonia Hernández Santano UNIVERSIDAD DE HUELVA [email protected] Astrophil’s love for Stella is not the conventional Platonic love of Petrarchist poems. We cannot fully consider him the romantic lover who aspires to a spiritual enjoying of his lady’s virtues and beauty for, though he attempts to represent his feelings according to the parameters of Platonism, he also makes his basest sexual desire flourish in many of the sonnets or songs of Astrophil and Stella. It is not that his begins by being a pure love that progressively degenerates into a blatant expression of his sexual needs due to an increase of his desire. The material nature of his love as opposed to spiritual love is obvious from the very beginning of the sequence. It is, however, a fact that Astrophil does frequently express his amorous feeling by means of Platonic topics such as the correspondence between physical beauty and spiritual virtue, as in sonnet 48 when he refers to Stella’s eyes as “where Virtue is made strong by Beautie’s might” (l. 2) or that he identifies himself with the agonizing lover of Petrarchist sequences who suffers the wounds of Cupid as in sonnet 20: “Fly, fly, my friends, I have my death wound” (l. 1) or with the slave of his beloved as in sonnet 47: “What, have I thus betrayed my libertie?” (l. 1). But the Platonic representation of his love is continually corrupted by frequent ironic allusions to it and to sexual desire.
    [Show full text]
  • Platonic Love for Persons Vlastos (1973) Raises a Famous Critique of Plato's Account of Love in the Symposium. the Highest
    Platonic Love for Persons Vlastos (1973) raises a famous critique of Plato’s account of love in the Symposium. The highest form of erōs, as it is described in Diotima’s scala amoris, is not for any particular individual but takes as its object the form of beauty itself (211a1-d1). Furthermore, erōs for an individual features in this account purely as stepping-stone to the philosopher’s comprehension of beauty. Not only is it difficult to understand what this impersonal erōs is, but it is difficult to understand why Plato thinks it is such an important part of a life well lived. So puzzled is Vlastos by the impersonality of erōs on this account that he ultimately finds it lacking in “kindness, tenderness, compassion,” and “respect for the integrity of the beloved” (30). What is missing, he claims, is an account of love for “persons who are themselves worthy of love for their own sake.” Since the publication of Vlastos’ critique, many have attempted to save Plato’s account by showing that love of particular individuals is consistent with or important to the philosopher’s pursuit of beauty (i.e. Price 1981, Nehamas 2007, Sheffield 2009, Urstad 2010). In other words, scholars have attempted to show that the impersonal love of the Symposium is not so impersonal after all. This paper takes a somewhat different approach; it argues that the impersonal nature of erōs in the Symposium is consistent with an overarching lack of esteem for personal relationships elsewhere in the dialogues. In the Crito, for example, Socrates appears largely unconcerned with the care of his sons, ranking his obligation to them well behind his duty to the laws (54b2-3).
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-48303-2 — the Moon in the Greek and Roman Imagination Karen Ní Mheallaigh Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-48303-2 — The Moon in the Greek and Roman Imagination Karen ní Mheallaigh Index More Information Index Achilles’ shield. See Homer Callimachus, – Aëtius, – celestial bowls, – Aglaonice, – Cicero, Somnium Scipionis, –, , See Alcmaeon of Croton, , – selēnoskopia (or ‘view from Moon’) Alcman Cleomedes, , Partheneia (Maiden Songs), – cognitive estrangement. See selēnoskopia (view from Alexander of Abonouteichos, – Moon) amphiphōntes, Colin Webster, , – analogical drift, Corinna, – Anaxagoras of Clazomenae, , –, –, cup of Helios, – Cyrano de Bergerac, , n Anaximander of Miletus, – Anaximenes of Miletus, – Demetrius Triclinius, n, , – Ancient Greek calendar, See also parapēgmata Democritus of Abdera, –, Antiphanes of Berge, – Diogenes of Apollonia, antiphraxis, – dioptra. See Lucian, True Stories Antonius Diogenes, The incredible things beyond Thule earthshine, – and scholarly hoax, – Earthy Moon Theory (EMT), –, –, and the Arctic, – See Plutarch, De facie and the Moon, – problems/challenges, , – narrative complexity, – eclipse Apollo Noumēnios, lunar eclipse, – Apuleius mechanism of eclipse, – lunam despumari, – solar eclipse, , – Aristarchus of Samos, , Empedocles of Acragas, –, , – Aristotle Empedotimus, fire creatures on the Moon, – Endymiones, , – on nature of Moon, Ennius’ dream, – theory of elements, Epimenides of Crete, – Astraeus, Eratosthenes of Cyrene, astral travel. See soul projection Hermes. See selēnoskopia (or ‘view from astronomical observation, , See mountains Moon’) astronomy
    [Show full text]
  • Concepts of Love and Some Implications for Education
    CONCEPTS OF LOVE AND SOME IMPLICATIONS FOR EDUCATION Dina Andersen A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the Department of Theory and Policy Studies in Education, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the Universis. of Toronto Copyright 0 Dina Andersen 1998 National Library Bibliothèque nationale of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to ~ibliothequenationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de rnicrofiche/fïlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otheMrise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimes reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS When 1 decided to undertake a study of love 1 did not realize that rnany would express hesitations and personal reservations about the topic. 1 am therefore doubly grateful to Dr. Clive Beck, chair, for his continuous support, and to Dr. Grace Feuerverger as well as Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Platonic Love in a Colorado Courtroom: Martha Nussbaum, John Finnis, and Plato's Laws in Evans V
    Articles Platonic Love in a Colorado Courtroom: Martha Nussbaum, John Finnis, and Plato's Laws in Evans v. Romer Randall Baldwin Clark* I. RELEVANT FOR FIFTEEN MINUTES-OR THIRTY CENTURIES? To the ridicule of the highbrow popular press' and the surprise of classical scholars,2 Plato's Laws,3 a work which was mocked, even in * University of Virginia School of Law, Class of 2002. Ph.D., University of Chicago, 1998. Research Associate, Dartmouth College Department of Government, 1997-99. Author, THE LAW MOST BEAUTIFUL AND BEST: MEDICAL ARGUMENT AND MAGICAL RHETORIC IN PLATO'S LAWS (Rowman & Littlefield - Lexington Books, forthcoming 2001). This article has benefited from the comments of many friends, colleagues, and teachers. For their assistance, I would like to thank Danielle Allen, Larry Arnhart, Richard 0. Brooks, Robert A. Burt, Allison D. Clark, Andrew P. Clark, Elizabeth A. Clark, Glenn W. Clark, Matthew Crawford, Richard Dougherty, Martha A. Field, Shawntel R. Fugate, Martin P. Golding, L. Kent Greenawalt, A.E. Dick Howard, Leon R. Kass, Matthew Kutcher, Melissa S. Lane, Mark J. Lutz, Roger D. Masters, Lynn Mather, Angelia K. Means, Ted H. Miller, S. Sarah Monoson, David Peritz, Richard A. Posner, Christopher Rohrbacher, Ariel C. Silver, Nathan Tarcov, Bradley A. Thayer, Elizabeth E. Theran, Paul Ulrich, Eduardo A. Velasquez, Lloyd L. Weinreb, Martin D. Yaffe, and the members of my edit team at the Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities. I only regret that I was unable to address all of their criticisms. Particularly profound appreciation is owed to my friend and colleague, James B. Murphy, whose queries helped me conceive this work and whose encouragement brought it to light: aneu gar phil6n oudeis heloit' an zen.
    [Show full text]
  • Platonic Relationship” Basically Means a Super-Deep by Sara Gaynes Levy Jan 27, 2020 Connection
    enough value on platonic love,” says Jordana Jacobs, PhD, a psychologist in New York City. This strictly non-sexual SUBSCRIBE SIGN IN relationship “has the potential to be deep, intense, and life-altering,” she says. But how to make them work, How to Make a Platonic Friendship Work especially if you're married to someone else, is a question that many couples and friends grapple with. The key is to set boundaries. And, be honest with your spouse, if you have one. “Platonic relationship” basically means a super-deep By Sara Gaynes Levy Jan 27, 2020 connection. This type of friendship can exist between many pairs, though it’s most commonly associated with a connection between members of the opposite sex (think: When Harry Met Sally). Of course it can also occur between pals of all genders and orientation. It’s worth noting that not every friendship is a platonic one. “When you meet a person, there is a process by which you determine what kind of role they'll play in your life, including how close you are meant to be with them,” says Jacobs. If you ultimately end up feeling that deep connection, that’s platonic love. A healthy platonic friendship means no sexual feelings are involved. “I see platonic love as a special emotional and spiritual relationship between two people,” says Diana Raab, PhD, author of Writing for Bliss. “It does not involve any type of sexual interest, but there is deep caring, mutual respect, and loyalty,” she says. More from Oprah Daily Nathan Harris Discusses His Debut Novel with Oprah NBC Between love songs, romantic comedies, and will-they-won’t-they TV couples, the world has done a pretty good job convincing us that romantic love is paramount.
    [Show full text]
  • On Some Borrowed and Misunderstood Problems in Greek Catoptrics
    On Some Borrowed and Misunderstood Problems in Greek Catoptrics by ALEXANDERJONES Optics was one of the first sciences to which ancient Greek mathe- maticians attempted to apply the apparatus of geometry. They were most successful in describing geometrically certain phenomena of per- spective (as in Euclid’s Optics and parts of Pappus’s Collection, Book 6),less so in catoljtrics, the study of mirrors.’ The problems typically encountered in the surviving writings on catoptrics fall into two classes: those dealing with the reflection of rays cast from a luminous source such as the sun upon minors of plane or curved surface, and those involving the projection of lines of sight from the eye by way of a minor to an object. The most basic problem of the first class, to make a burning mirror, is solved correctly in Diocles’s On Burning Mirrors (ca. 200 B.C.) with both spherical and parabolic mirrors; other prob- lems were investigated by Diocles, by Anthemius (ca. A.D. 620) in his On Paradoxical Devices, and doubtless by other authors in the cen- turies between.2 In general these problems were amenable to geo- metrical treatment in antiquity because Hellenistic geometers were equipped to study the tangent lines to a wide range of curves (or the tangent planes to analogous surfaces) and the behaviour of straight lines in a given direction or through a given point .and inflected at the curve or surface at equal angles to the tangent at the point of in- cidence. Problems of the other class, in which it was required to make an ar- rangement of mirrors or a mirror with a special curvature, such that a *Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology, Victoria College, Univer- sity of Toronto, Toronto, Canada MSS 1K7.
    [Show full text]
  • May Plato's Academy Be Considered As the First Academic Institution?
    Center for Open Access in Science ▪ https://www.centerprode.com/ojsh.html Open Journal for Studies in History, 2019, 2(2), 35-42. ISSN (Online) 2620-066X ▪ https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojsh.0202.02035s _________________________________________________________________________ May Plato’s Academy be Considered as the First Academic Institution? Zhulduz Amangelidyevna Seitkasimova M. Auezov South Kazakhstan State University, KAZAKHSTAN Faculty of Pedagogy and Culture, Shymkent Received 8 November 2019 ▪ Revised 17 December 2019 ▪ Accepted 23 December 2019 Abstract Plato’s Academy is undoubtedly the first higher education institution in history, and in ancient Athens itself represents the most important educational institution. It constituted in the context of the universal development that took place in ancient Athens, in the 5th and 4th century BC, and it continued to work until the Byzantine Emperor Justinian forbade the work of all schools of philosophy (529 AD). This development, which is part of the so-called Golden Age of ancient Athens, represents the period of Greek history in which the foundations of Western civilization originated, as we know it today. Plato appears as one of the greatest philosophers of ancient Greece, along with Socrates and Aristotle, to the first of whom appears as a student and to the second as a teacher. Philosophy in the true sense of the word was created in Plato’s era in ancient Athens (Russell, 1975), and Plato’s Academy, in which he, along with his students, talked about various philosophical topics through the Garden of Akademos, was the impetus for this development. There are also opinions that the development of philosophy after Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle is only of reproductive character when it comes to the basics of philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Atmospheric Refraction: a History
    Atmospheric refraction: a history Waldemar H. Lehn and Siebren van der Werf We trace the history of atmospheric refraction from the ancient Greeks up to the time of Kepler. The concept that the atmosphere could refract light entered Western science in the second century B.C. Ptolemy, 300 years later, produced the first clearly defined atmospheric model, containing air of uniform density up to a sharp upper transition to the ether, at which the refraction occurred. Alhazen and Witelo transmitted his knowledge to medieval Europe. The first accurate measurements were made by Tycho Brahe in the 16th century. Finally, Kepler, who was aware of unusually strong refractions, used the Ptolemaic model to explain the first documented and recognized mirage (the Novaya Zemlya effect). © 2005 Optical Society of America OCIS codes: 000.2850, 010.4030. 1. Introduction the term catoptrics became reserved for reflection Atmospheric refraction, which is responsible for both only, and the term dioptrics was adopted to describe astronomical refraction and mirages, is a subject that the study of refraction.2 The latter name was still in is widely dispersed through the literature, with very use in Kepler’s time. few works dedicated entirely to its exposition. The same must be said for the history of refraction. Ele- ments of the history are scattered throughout numer- 2. Early Greek Theories ous references, many of which are obscure and not Aristotle (384–322 BC) was one of the first philoso- readily available. It is our objective to summarize in phers to write about vision. He considered that a one place the development of the concept of atmo- transparent medium such as air or water was essen- spheric refraction from Greek antiquity to the time of tial to transmit information to the eye, and that vi- Kepler, and its use to explain the first widely known sion in a vacuum would be impossible.
    [Show full text]