DOCSLIB.ORG

Jožef Stefan Institute

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jožef Stefan Institute Jožef Stefan Institute Joseph/Jožef Stefan Fields Physicist Institutions University of Vienna Alma mater University of Vienna Doctoral Andreas von Ettingshausen advisor Doctoral Ludwig Boltzmann students Marian Smoluchowski Johann Josef Loschmidt Jožef Stefan (1835-1893) Known for Stefan–Boltzmann law Born 24 March 1835 Stefan–Boltzmann constant St Peter (today in Klagenfurt σ am Wörthersee), Austrian Stefan problem Empire Stefan's equation Died 7 January 1893 (aged 57) Stefan's formula Vienna, Austria-Hungary Stefan flow Residence Austria Stefan number Citizenship Austrian Empire Maxwell–Stefan diffusion Nationality Slovene Notable awards Lieben Prize (1865) JSI – Jožef Stefan Institute Founded in 1949 Leading Slovenian national research organization in the areas of natural sciences and technology: ◦ Information and communication technologies & Electronics (8 depts) ◦ Physics (8 depts) ◦ Chemistry, Biochemistry & Nanotechnology (11 depts) ◦ Environmental Sciences and Reactor engineering and Energetics (1 dept) Formally a public research institute, founder Republic of Slovenia ~ 600 researchers (total staff ~970) > 200 on-going international projects > 100 FP7 and EURATOM Long history of collaboration with industry Co-founded Technology park Ljubljana, Politechnics in Nova Gorica, Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School, … ICT & Electronics departments E1 - Automation, Biocybernetics and Robotics E2 - Systems and Control E3 - Artificial Intelligence E5 - Open Computer Systems and Networks E6 - Communication Systems E7 - Computer Systems E8 - Knowledge Technologies E9 - Intelligent Systems Physics departments F1 - Theoretical Physics F2 - Low and Medium Energy Physics F3 - Thin Films and Surfaces F4 - Surface Engineering and Optoelectronics F5 - Condensed Matter Physics F7 - Complex Matter F8 - Reactor Physics F9 - Experimental Particle Physics Chemistry, Biochemistry & Nanotechnology depts B1 - Biochemistry and Molecular Biology B2 - Molecular and Biomedical Sciences B3 – Biotechnology K1 - Inorganic Chemistry and Technology K3 - Physical and Organic Chemistry K5 - Electronic Ceramics K6 - Engineering Ceramics K7 - Nanostructured Materials K8 - Synthesis of Materials K8 K9 - Advanced Materials Environmental Sciences and Reactor Engineering depts O2 - Environmental Sciences R4 - Reactor Engineering Department of Communication systems Dept. of Communication Systems Dept. of Communication Systems ◦ 17 researchers with PhD (2 part time) ◦ 7 young researchers and PhD students ◦ 3 administration and technical support ◦ 2 visiting assistants ◦ 6+ undergraduate students Dept. of Communication Systems Organisation ◦ Communications Technology Laboratory (G. Kandus) Telecommunication systems and networks, satellite/terrestrial fixed/mobile wireless access, propagation modelling, radio resource management, mobility management, network coding, simulation and modelling, … ◦ Laboratory for Parallel and Distributed Systems (R. Trobec) parallel and distributed algorithms and architectures, modeling and simulation of complex systems (chemistry, medicine, environment), measurement and processing of bioelectrical signals, body area networks,… ◦ Laboratory for Networked Embedded Systems (T. Javornik) Wireless sensor networks, Internet/Web of Things, networked embedded systems, sensor network testbeds, control and monitoring platforms, … + SensorLab joint laboratory between Dept of Communication Systems and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Communications Technology Development and performance evaluation of telecommunication systems, networks and services Wireless channel measurement, modeling, estimation and prediction 10 lin 0 Op = -3dB Op = -2dB Fixed and mobile wireless access based on Op = -1dB -10 Op = 0dB Central location -20 terrestrial, satellite and aerial platform -30 PDF P DS [dB] -40 systems Dislocated network A -50 -60 -70 Advanced access architectures for -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 Dislocated network B FrequencyfT efficient service delivery in s heterogeneous wireless networks ◦ Service-Oriented Networks, Self-Organised Wireless Networks ◦ Cognitive Radio and Networking A1 A2 … An Service Manager Interface Requirements Layer Simulation and performance evaluation Rules Reasoning Engine tools for communication procedures, Queue of Bidder Services ServiceManager protocols and applications, network Assignment Engine CognitiveProcess Context Resource Stack planning and dimensioning, … Manager Manager Manager SAN SAN Parallel and Distributed Systems Development of parallel and distributed algorithms and architectures for computer simulations ◦ multicore processors ◦ computer clusters ◦ grid and cloud technologies Modeling and simulation in the fields of medicine and chemistry ◦ molecular dynamics ◦ human heart ◦ human knee ◦ biological tissues Measurement, analysis and post-processing of bioelectrical signals Body area sensor networks Networked Embedded Systems Research and development in the area of networked embedded systems ◦ from WSN to IoT, WoT and Smart Objects ◦ virtual sensors, virtual sensor networks, “Sensor as a Service” ◦ design and implementation of networked embedded systems and sensor networks Development of new methods of data collection/harvesting, preprocessing, storing, advanced processing, advanced interpretation and visualisation Development of software platforms for dimensioning and control, performance evaluation, sensor data visualisation, sensor data management, sensor data stream mining ◦ TopoSWiM, Videk, StreamSense, Sensors mash-up, GSN, … Covered communications areas Architectures and communication for parallel and distributed computing ◦ within multicore processors, between processors and memory, between periphery (sensors) and processing boards – hard real time ◦ computer clusters ◦ grid and cloud technologies Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks ◦ Wireless Body Area (Sensor) Networks ◦ large scale, mesh, relay, heterogeneous, virtual Fixed and Mobile Wireless Access Networks ◦ local, ad hoc, terrestrial, heterogeneous, cognitive, stratospheric, satellites Wireless/Wired backhaul networks ◦ hierarchical, fixed/mobile stratospheric (HAP-based), satellites Past international projects (selection) More than 10 COST Actions since 1992 FP5 ◦ HeliNet - Network of stratospheric platforms for traffic monitoring, environmental surveillance and broadband services FP6 ◦ CAPANINA - Communications from Aerial Platform Networks delivering Broadband Communications for All ◦ SatNEx I & II - Satellite Communications Network of Excellence FP7 ◦ AgroSense - Wireless Sensor Networks and Remote Sensing – Foundation of Modern Agricultural Infrastructure ◦ ProSense – Promote, Mobilize, Reinforce and Integrate WSN Research and Researchers ◦ ACTIVE - Enabling the Knowledge Powered Enterprise Ongoing international projects COST Actions ◦ IC 0902 – Cognitive Radio and Networking for Cooperative Coexistence of Heterogeneous Wireless Networks ◦ IC 0906 – Wireless Networking for Moving Objects ◦ IC 1004 – Cooperative Radio Communications for Green Smart Environments ◦ IC 1101 – Optical Wireless Communications - An Emerging Technology ◦ IC 1104 – Random Network Coding and Designs over GF(q) ◦ ... FP7 ◦ BalkanGEONet - Balkan GEO Network – Towards Inclusion of Balkan Countries into Global Earth Observation Initiatives ◦ PlanetData Network of Excellence ◦ CREW – Cognitive Radio Experimentation World ◦ ABSOLUTE – Aerial Base Stations with Opportunistic Links for Unexpected & Temporary Events ◦ CITI-SENSE - Development of sensor-based Citizens' Observatory Community for improving quality of life in cities National projects (selection) RTD projects ◦ ARRS – Multiple antenna systems for mobile WiMAX co-funded by Telsima d.o.o. and Telekom Slovenije ◦ ARRS – Advanced procedures for interactive composition of sensor networks ◦ RIP 09 – 4G Pico Base station collaboration with 4G Neuron and UNI-LJ ◦ KC OPCOMM – Open communication platform for service integration collaboration with Telekom, Špica, Iskratel, Globtel, ... ◦ KC CLASS – Cloud assisted services collaboration with Studio Moderna, SmartCom, Infotehna, NIL, ... ◦ ... Applied projects ◦ Mobitel (open source propagation modelling tool GRASS-RaPlaT) ◦ Telekom Slovenije (backbone network performance evaluation, network alarms root cause analysis, …) ◦ Telsima (development of WiMAX Pico BS) ◦ … Relevance to the project and main tasks Collaborative partner ◦ transfer of experience and knowledge in innovative research in the field of Communications wireless sensor networks and computer technologies; ◦ networking activities the mobility of senior and younger researchers; joint organisation of regional conferences, workshops, and invited lectures; support in implementation of intellectual rights protection policies. Role in the project Collaborative partner 2 involved in: ◦ WP3: tasks 3.1, 3.2 ◦ WP4: tasks 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 ◦ WP6: task 6.1 ◦ WP7: task 7.3. Specific tasks: ◦ transfer of experience and knowledge ◦ networking activities which include the mobility of researchers ◦ joint organisation of regional conferences and workshops ◦ support in the implementation of the intellectual rights protection THANK YOU FOR ATTENTION! .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 6 the Aftermath of the Cambridge-Vienna Controversy: Radioactivity and Politics in Vienna in the 1930S
    Trafficking Materials and Maria Rentetzi Gendered Experimental Practices Chapter 6 The Aftermath of the Cambridge-Vienna Controversy: Radioactivity and Politics in Vienna in the 1930s Consequences of the Cambridge-Vienna episode ranged from the entrance of other 1 research centers into the field as the study of the atomic nucleus became a promising area of scientific investigation to the development of new experimental methods. As Jeff Hughes describes, three key groups turned to the study of atomic nucleus. Gerhard Hoffman and his student Heinz Pose studied artificial disintegration at the Physics Institute of the University of Halle using a polonium source sent by Meyer.1 In Paris, Maurice de Broglie turned his well-equipped laboratory for x-ray research into a center for radioactivity studies and Madame Curie started to accumulate polonium for research on artificial disintegration. The need to replace the scintillation counters with a more reliable technique also 2 led to the extensive use of the cloud chamber in Cambridge.2 Simultaneously, the development of electric counting methods for measuring alpha particles in Rutherford's laboratory secured quantitative investigations and prompted Stetter and Schmidt from the Vienna Institute to focus on the valve amplifier technique.3 Essential for the work in both the Cambridge and the Vienna laboratories was the use of polonium as a strong source of alpha particles for those methods as an alternative to the scintillation technique. Besides serving as a place for scientific production, the laboratory was definitely 3 also a space for work where tasks were labeled as skilled and unskilled and positions were divided to those paid monthly and those supported by grant money or by research fellowships.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Austria Austria’S Place in Europe and the World
    Global Austria Austria’s Place in Europe and the World Günter Bischof, Fritz Plasser (Eds.) Anton Pelinka, Alexander Smith, Guest Editors CONTEMPORARY AUSTRIAN STUDIES | Volume 20 innsbruck university press Copyright ©2011 by University of New Orleans Press, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. All inquiries should be addressed to UNO Press, University of New Orleans, ED 210, 2000 Lakeshore Drive, New Orleans, LA, 70119, USA. www.unopress.org. Book design: Lindsay Maples Cover cartoon by Ironimus (1992) provided by the archives of Die Presse in Vienna and permission to publish granted by Gustav Peichl. Published in North America by Published in Europe by University of New Orleans Press Innsbruck University Press ISBN 978-1-60801-062-2 ISBN 978-3-9028112-0-2 Contemporary Austrian Studies Sponsored by the University of New Orleans and Universität Innsbruck Editors Günter Bischof, CenterAustria, University of New Orleans Fritz Plasser, Universität Innsbruck Production Editor Copy Editor Bill Lavender Lindsay Maples University of New Orleans University of New Orleans Executive Editors Klaus Frantz, Universität Innsbruck Susan Krantz, University of New Orleans Advisory Board Siegfried Beer Helmut Konrad Universität Graz Universität
    [Show full text]
  • A New Look at Loschmidt's Representations of Benzene
    Bull. Hist. Chem., VOLUME 38, Number 1 (2013) 29 150 YEARS AFTER THEIR EMERGENCE: A NEW LOOK AT LOSCHMIDT’S REPRESENTATIONS OF BENZENE Heinz D. Roth, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Wright-Rieman Laboratories, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08854-8087, [email protected] Abstract to Kekulé’s theories, because, in the summary of Alan Rocke, they were “at once too empirical and too specula- A new examination of structures that Loschmidt tive” (10); von Meyer criticized Kekulé for not giving considered for benzene derivatives, notably naphthalene credit to Frankland for the concept of valence or to Kolbe and “rings” doubly bonded to O or triply bonded to N, or for his many contributions (11). show conclusively that Loschmidt did not view benzene More recent criticism has its roots in the work as a planar ring of six carbon atoms. of Kekulé’s biographer and successor on the Chair in Bonn, Richard Anschütz. While compiling material for Introduction his two-volume Kekulé biography (12), Anschütz found references to Couper (13), who had developed the idea August Kekulé has long been credited with several of linking carbon atoms independent of Kekulé; he also major contributions to structural organic chemistry: rec- noticed a footnote in Kekulé’s 1865 paper concerning ognizing the tetravalence of carbon (1857) (1,2); recog- structural formulae by Loschmidt. This 1861 article (14) nizing that carbon atoms combine with one another to had been published outside of the established chemical form chains (1858) (3); and recognizing the structure of literature and was not readily available. Anschütz noted benzene (1865) (4), in the view of Japp, the “crowning that Loschmidt’s booklet was hard to read (15); therefore, achievement of the doctrine of the linking of atoms” (5).
    [Show full text]
  • Avogadro's Constant
    Avogadro's Constant Nancy Eisenmenger Question Artem, 8th grade How \Avogadro constant" was invented and how scientists calculated it for the first time? Answer What is Avogadro's Constant? • Avogadros constant, NA: the number of particles in a mole • mole: The number of Carbon-12 atoms in 0.012 kg of Carbon-12 23 −1 • NA = 6:02214129(27) × 10 mol How was Avogadro's Constant Invented? Avogadro's constant was invented because scientists were learning about measuring matter and wanted a way to relate the microscopic to the macroscopic (e.g. how many particles (atoms, molecules, etc.) were in a sample of matter). The first scientists to see a need for Avogadro's constant were studying gases and how they behave under different temperatures and pressures. Amedeo Avogadro did not invent the constant, but he did state that all gases with the same volume, pressure, and temperature contained the same number of gas particles, which turned out to be very important to the development of our understanding of the principles of chemistry and physics. The constant was first calculated by Johann Josef Loschmidt, a German scientist, in 1865. He actually calculated the Loschmidt number, a constant that measures the same thing as Avogadro's number, but in different units (ideal gas particles per cubic meter at 0◦C and 1 atm). When converted to the same units, his number was off by about a factor of 10 from Avogadro's number. That may sound like a lot, but given the tools he had to work with for both theory and experiment and the magnitude of the number (∼ 1023), that is an impressively close estimate.
    [Show full text]
  • Physiker-Entdeckungen Und Erdzeiten Hans Ulrich Stalder 31.1.2019
    Physiker-Entdeckungen und Erdzeiten Hans Ulrich Stalder 31.1.2019 Haftungsausschluss / Disclaimer / Hyperlinks Für fehlerhafte Angaben und deren Folgen kann weder eine juristische Verantwortung noch irgendeine Haftung übernommen werden. Änderungen vorbehalten. Ich distanziere mich hiermit ausdrücklich von allen Inhalten aller verlinkten Seiten und mache mir diese Inhalte nicht zu eigen. Erdzeiten Erdzeit beginnt vor x-Millionen Jahren Quartär 2,588 Neogen 23,03 (erste Menschen vor zirka 4 Millionen Jahren) Paläogen 66 Kreide 145 (Dinosaurier) Jura 201,3 Trias 252,2 Perm 298,9 Karbon 358,9 Devon 419,2 Silur 443,4 Ordovizium 485,4 Kambrium 541 Ediacarium 635 Cryogenium 850 Tonium 1000 Stenium 1200 Ectasium 1400 Calymmium 1600 Statherium 1800 Orosirium 2050 Rhyacium 2300 Siderium 2500 Physiker Entdeckungen Jahr 0800 v. Chr.: Den Babyloniern sind Sonnenfinsterniszyklen mit der Sarosperiode (rund 18 Jahre) bekannt. Jahr 0580 v. Chr.: Die Erde wird nach einer Theorie von Anaximander als Kugel beschrieben. Jahr 0550 v. Chr.: Die Entdeckung von ganzzahligen Frequenzverhältnissen bei konsonanten Klängen (Pythagoras in der Schmiede) führt zur ersten überlieferten und zutreffenden quantitativen Beschreibung eines physikalischen Sachverhalts. © Hans Ulrich Stalder, Switzerland Jahr 0500 v. Chr.: Demokrit postuliert, dass die Natur aus Atomen zusammengesetzt sei. Jahr 0450 v. Chr.: Vier-Elemente-Lehre von Empedokles. Jahr 0300 v. Chr.: Euklid begründet anhand der Reflexion die geometrische Optik. Jahr 0265 v. Chr.: Zum ersten Mal wird die Theorie des Heliozentrischen Weltbildes mit geometrischen Berechnungen von Aristarchos von Samos belegt. Jahr 0250 v. Chr.: Archimedes entdeckt das Hebelgesetz und die statische Auftriebskraft in Flüssigkeiten, Archimedisches Prinzip. Jahr 0240 v. Chr.: Eratosthenes bestimmt den Erdumfang mit einer Gradmessung zwischen Alexandria und Syene.
    [Show full text]
  • 'How?' Arxiv:2107.02558V1 [Physics.Hist-Ph] 6 Jul 2021
    Understanding Physics: ‘What?’, ‘Why?’, and ‘How?’ Mario Hubert California Institute of Technology Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences —— Forthcoming in the European Journal for Philosophy of Science July 7, 2021 I want to combine two hitherto largely independent research projects, scientific un- derstanding and mechanistic explanations. Understanding is not only achieved by answering why-questions, that is, by providing scientific explanations, but also by answering what-questions, that is, by providing what I call scientific descriptions. Based on this distinction, I develop three forms of understanding: understanding-what, understanding-why, and understanding-how. I argue that understanding-how is a par- ticularly deep form of understanding, because it is based on mechanistic explanations, which answer why something happens in virtue of what it is made of. I apply the three forms of understanding to two case studies: first, to the historical development of ther- modynamics and, second, to the differences between the Clausius and the Boltzmann entropy in explaining thermodynamic processes. arXiv:2107.02558v1 [physics.hist-ph] 6 Jul 2021 i Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Scientific Inquiry as Asking ‘Why?’ and ‘What?’ 3 2.1 The Origin and Epistemic Goals of Scientific Inquiry . 3 2.2 Scientific Descriptions and Aristotle’s Four Causes . 6 3 Scientific Descriptions and Mechanisms 10 4 A Critique of Current Theories of Understanding 11 4.1 Grimm’s Account . 12 4.2 De Regt’s Contextual Theory of Understanding . 14 5 Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics 17 5.1 Understanding in the Historical Development . 18 5.2 Entropy: Clausius and Boltzmann . 24 5.2.1 Clausius Entropy .
    [Show full text]
  • In Praise of Clausius Entropy 01/26/2021
    In Praise of Clausius Entropy 01/26/2021 In Praise of Clausius Entropy: Reassessing the Foundations of Boltzmannian Statistical Mechanics Forthcoming in Foundations of Physics Christopher Gregory Weaver* Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Department of Philosophya Affiliate Assistant Professor of Physics, Department of Physicsb Core Faculty in the Illinois Center for Advanced Studies of the Universeb University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Visiting Fellow, Center for Philosophy of ScienceC University of Pittsburgh *wgceave9@illinois [dot] edu (or) CGW18@pitt [dot] edu aDepartment of Philosophy 200 Gregory Hall 810 South Wright ST MC-468 Urbana, IL 61801 bDepartment of Physics 1110 West Green ST Urbana, IL 61801 CCenter for Philosophy of Science University of Pittsburgh 1117 Cathedral of Learning 4200 Fifth Ave. Pittsburgh, PA 15260 1 In Praise of Clausius Entropy 01/26/2021 Acknowledgments: I thank Olivier Darrigol and Matthew Stanley for their comments on an earlier draft of this paper. I thank Jochen Bojanowski for a little translation help. I presented a version of the paper at the NY/NJ (Metro Area) Philosophy of Science group meeting at NYU in November of 2019. I’d like to especially thank Barry Loewer, Tim Maudlin, and David Albert for their criticisms at that event. Let me extend special thanks to Tim Maudlin for some helpful correspondence on various issues addressed in this paper. While Professor Maudlin and I still disagree, that correspondence was helpful. I also presented an earlier draft of this work to the Department of Physics at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in January 2020. I thank many of the physics faculty and graduate students for their questions and objections.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurements and Uncertainty
    Measurements and Uncertainty Measurement = comparing a value with a unit Measurement = read between the scale division marks, estimate the measurement to the nearest one tenth of the space between scale divisions Significant Figures = digits read from the scale + the last estimated digit Measurement error = minimum ±1 of the last digit 1 Measurement 32.33 °C What is the 32.3 °C smallest scale division 2 Reading from a digital display error = ±1 of the last digit 3 Accuracy and Precision Every measurement has its error Repeated measurements - error estimation Precision = is the degree to which repeated measurements show the same results, depends on the abilities of experimentator Accuracy = the agreement between experimental data and a known value, depends on instrument quality 4 Weighing 5 Number of significant figures is given by the instrument quality Significant Figures • All nonzero digits are significant 3.548 • Zeroes between nonzero digits are significant 3.0005 • Leading zeros to the left of the first nonzero digits are not significant 0.0034 • Trailing zeroes that are also to the right of a decimal point in a number are significant 0.003400 • When a number ends in zeroes that are not to the right of a decimal point, the zeroes are not necessarily significant 1200 Ambiguity avoided by the use of standard exponential, or "scientific," notation: 1.2 103 or 1.200 103 depending on the number of significant figures 6 Significant Figures Reading from a scale – number of significant figures is given by the instrument quality 8.75 cm3
    [Show full text]
  • Entropy and Energy, – a Universal Competition
    Entropy 2008, 10, 462-476; DOI: 10.3390/entropy-e10040462 OPEN ACCESS entropy ISSN 1099-4300 www.mdpi.com/journal/entropy Article Entropy and Energy, – a Universal Competition Ingo Müller Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany E-mail: [email protected] Received: 31 July 2008; in revised form: 9 September 2008 / Accepted: 22 September 2008 / Published: 15 October 2008 Abstract: When a body approaches equilibrium, energy tends to a minimum and entropy tends to a maximum. Often, or usually, the two tendencies favour different configurations of the body. Thus energy is deterministic in the sense that it favours fixed positions for the atoms, while entropy randomizes the positions. Both may exert considerable forces in the attempt to reach their objectives. Therefore they have to compromise; indeed, under most circumstances it is the available free energy which achieves a minimum. For low temperatures that free energy is energy itself, while for high temperatures it is determined by entropy. Several examples are provided for the roles of energy and entropy as competitors: – Planetary atmospheres; – osmosis; – phase transitions in gases and liquids and in shape memory alloys, and – chemical reactions, viz. the Haber Bosch synthesis of ammonia and photosynthesis. Some historical remarks are strewn through the text to make the reader appreciate the difficulties encountered by the pioneers in understanding the subtlety of the concept of entropy, and in convincing others of the validity and relevance of their arguments. Keywords: concept of entropy, entropy and energy 1. First and second laws of thermodynamics The mid-nineteenth century saw the discovery of the two laws of thermodynamics, virtually simultaneously.
    [Show full text]
  • Karl Przibram: Radioactivity, Crystals, and Colors
    Phys. Perspect. 21 (2019) 163–193 Ó 2019 The Author(s) This article is an open access publication 1422-6944/19/030163-31 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00016-019-00242-z Physics in Perspective Karl Przibram: Radioactivity, Crystals, and Colors Wolfgang L. Reiter* Karl Przibram is one of the pioneers of early solid state physics in the field of the inter- dependence of coloration effects and luminescence in solids (crystals, minerals) induced by radiation. In 1921 Przibram discovered the effect of radio-photoluminescence, the light- stimulated phosphorescence in activated crystals induced by gamma rays. In 1926 Przibram was the first to use the term, Farbzentrum (color center, F-center), and in 1923 he advanced the view of atomic centers as carriers of coloration. Being a pupil of Ludwig Boltzmann and Franz S. Exner, he dedicated his early work to condensation and conductivity phenomena in gases and Brownian motion. Under the influence of Stefan Meyer, he began his lifelong interest in mineralogy, setting up his own research group at the Vienna Radium Institute, which pioneered investigations on thermoluminescence and gave a first description of glow curves. Being of Jewish descent, Przibram had to leave Austria after the Nazis took power; he found shelter in Belgium and returned to Austria in 1946 as professor for experimental physics at the University of Vienna. This paper is a first attempt to give an overview of the cultural and scientific background of Przibram’s life and science in context of the cultural and political developments from 1900 to 1950 in Austria. Key words: Biography; mineral physics; coloration effects and luminescence in solids; Ludwig Boltzmann; Franz S.
    [Show full text]
  • Maxwell's Demon and the Second Law of Thermodynamics
    GENERAL ARTICLE Maxwell’s Demon and the Second Law of Thermodynamics P Radhakrishnamurty A century and a half ago, Maxwell introduced a thought experiment to illustrate the difficulties which arise in trying to apply the second law of thermodynamics at the level of molecules. He imagined an entity (since personified as ‘Mawell’s demon’) which could sort molecules into hot and Dr Radhakrishnamurthy cold and thereby create differences of temperature spontane- obtained his PhD from the ously, apparently violating the second law. This topic has Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, after which he fascinated physicists and has generated much discussion and worked as a scientist at the many new ideas, which this article goes over. Particularly Central Electrochemical interesting is the insight given by deeper analysis of the Research Institute, experiment. This brings out the relation between entropy and Karaikudi. He is now retired and enjoys reading information, and the role of irreversibility in computing as we and writing on topics in understand it – topics still under discussion today. science. His present research interests include Introduction classical thermodynamics and elastic collision theory. The science of thermodynamics is nearly 200 years old. It took birth in the works of Carnot around the year 1824 and grew into 1 It does not say anything about a subject of great significance. Just four simple laws – the zeroth the process being possible in practice. The distinction is ex- law, the first law, the second law and the third law – govern emplified by the simple example: thermodynamics. The first and the second laws are the bones and Theromodynamics says the the flesh of thermodynamics, and by comparison the zeroth and combination of hydrogen and the third laws are mere hat and slippers, in the language of Shee- oxygen to give water under con- ditions of room termperature and han.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTEMPORARY AUSTRIAN STUDIES | Volume 20
    Global Austria Austria’s Place in Europe and the World Günter Bischof, Fritz Plasser (Eds.) Anton Pelinka, Alexander Smith, Guest Editors CONTEMPORARY AUSTRIAN STUDIES | Volume 20 innsbruck university press Copyright ©2011 by University of New Orleans Press, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. All inquiries should be addressed to UNO Press, University of New Orleans, ED 210, 2000 Lakeshore Drive, New Orleans, LA, 70119, USA. www.unopress.org. Book design: Lindsay Maples Cover cartoon by Ironimus (1992) provided by the archives of Die Presse in Vienna and permission to publish granted by Gustav Peichl. Published in North America by Published in Europe by University of New Orleans Press Innsbruck University Press ISBN 978-1-60801-062-2 ISBN 978-3-9028112-0-2 Contemporary Austrian Studies Sponsored by the University of New Orleans and Universität Innsbruck Editors Günter Bischof, CenterAustria, University of New Orleans Fritz Plasser, Universität Innsbruck Production Editor Copy Editor Bill Lavender Lindsay Maples University of New Orleans University of New Orleans Executive Editors Klaus Frantz, Universität Innsbruck Susan Krantz, University of New Orleans Advisory Board Siegfried Beer Helmut Konrad Universität Graz Universität
    [Show full text]