DOCSLIB.ORG

Generating and Sustaining Combat Effectiveness: British 6Th Airborne Division, 5Th November 1942 – 27Th August 1944

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Generating and Sustaining Combat Effectiveness: British 6Th Airborne Division, 5Th November 1942 – 27Th August 1944 Generating and Sustaining Combat Effectiveness: British 6th Airborne Division, 5th November 1942 – 27th August 1944 Andrew Stephen Wheale Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy to the School of Humanities in the University of Buckingham September 2017 351 Abstract Generating and Sustaining Combat Effectiveness: British 6th Airborne Division, 5th November 1942 – 27th August 1944. The highly effective leadership of General Richard Nelson Gale overcame the haphazard nature of airborne operations 1939-1945, and enabled the unproven British 6th Airborne Division to achieve its objectives during the Normandy Campaign of June – August 1944. Despite its scattered parachute landings 6th Airborne achieved its D-Day goals and held the line for three months, a task for which it was not equipped. The historiography of the Normandy campaign and British Airborne Forces has recorded this achievement, but the reasons have not been explored. This thesis examines the factors that made this possible and analyses Gale’s impact on the Division’s organisational development, preparation and training which lay behind this success. To establish the environment within which Gale had to operate, this thesis explores the shaping forces which influenced the creation of 6th Airborne Division: the constraint of inadequate resources and the absence of a clear applied airborne doctrine, inter-service politics and the influence of key war figures such as Field Marshal Sir Alan Brooke. The study pursues the links between war situation, the cost and capability of equipment and manpower, developing technology, and ongoing training through to distinguishable impact on the enemy. Two unique models form the heart of the study. The first shows the process of 1940-1945 airborne assault methods based on British cognisance of 1940-1943 operations. The second exposes the influences needed to create high value military formations based on 6th Airborne’s experience – with Gale acting as a critical accelerant. The leadership provided by Gale in the creation, development and Normandy operations of 6th Airborne Division was critical. The capability of the Division was developed through a tough regime of realistic and relevant training which also forged a robust identity. Aggressive and inventive leadership was selected and employed throughout the order of battle, while intelligent but simple operational planning was used as the base of briefing which was then cascaded throughout. The impact of surprise in the landing operation and a pragmatic approach toward co-opting the firepower of surrounding forces then maximised 6th Airborne’s combat effectiveness. It was Gale and his leadership culture which underpinned the development of the capability of the airborne soldier and the cohesion of the fighting force as a whole. A theory of regarding Gale’s leadership can therefore be established. 2 Acknowledgements This thesis has been in process for six years, and many people have helped me bring it to final fruition. In many ways this thesis is the culmination of a lifetime fascination with history and particularly military history. I had some wonderful teachers including Ken Lewis, Chris Tyler, Dr Hew Pryce and the late Professor David Loades. I have had a great deal of help from experts from numerous archives. These included Anne Wickes at the Second World War Experience Centre; IWM Air Assault, Duxford – Wendy George and Bob Hilton; Bundesarchiv Freiberg – Axel Wittenberg; the staff of the National Archive (Kew); David Byrne at the Royal Warwicks Regimental Museum; and the staff of the Bodleian Library (especially Stuart Ackland and Angie Goodgame for help with maps). Also Dunja Sharif for useful translation assistance with German records; and along the way Robert Kershaw, friends at the British Commission for Military History (BCMH) and Carl Rijmen. Veterans I had the honour to speak to - Joe Beardsley, Ron Perry, Ernie Stringer, Nick Archdale and especially the late Tony Lycett. I should also like to thank Francis McClory (the Secretary of the 7 Para Bn Veterans’ Association) and Robin Savage for helping me to get in touch with these former paratroopers. At the University of Buckingham my peer group of other students, especially Andy Winnrow and Johnny Briggs. The support of Professors John Adamson and Saul David has been most important and much appreciated. I thank my readers Matthew Ford, Nick Wight-Boycott, Judith Priestman, and my brother Jon. My supervisors Professor Lloyd Clark and Dr Matthias Ströhn, who have both been a tremendous support throughout this process, having extraordinary patience and full of insightful advice. The final acknowledgement goes to my wife Sarah, whose patience and support has allowed me to finish the project, and to whom this study is devoted. 3 Abbreviations and Glossary I. General abbreviations II. British Unit title abbreviations III. Glossary of codenames – exercises and operations I. General abbreviations 2ic - Second-in-command AA – Air Assault Museum, Duxford AA - Anti-aircraft AAEF - Allied Air Expeditionary Force ACI - Army Council Instructions ADGB - Air Defence Great Britain AFV - Armoured Fighting Vehicle AGRA - Army Group Royal Artillery AHB - The Royal Air Force Air Historical Branch AL - Airlanding (glider) AM - Air Ministry AOC - Air Officer Commanding AOER - Army Officers Emergency Reserve APDS - armour piercing discarding sabot A.Tk - Anti-tank BAM – Freiberg (Militärarchiv) Bde - Brigade BEF - British Expeditionary Force Bn – Battalion Bty - Battery CAS - Chief, Air Staff 4 CIGS - Chief, Imperial General Staff C-in-C - Commander-in-Chief Cdo – Commando Cn - Canadian CO - Commanding Officer COC - Combined Operations Command COS - Chiefs of Staff COSSAC - Chief of Staff to the Allied Supreme Commander. A key D-Day planning post before the actual Supreme Commander was appointed Coy - Company CRA - Commander, Royal Artillery CRS - Commander, Royal Signals CSM - Company Sergeant Major CT - Combat temperament Div - Division DSO - Distinguished Service Order DZ - Drop zone (parachute) Eureka/Rebecca – Two part system was made up of a ground-based transmitter beacon (Eureka) which emitted a radio signal detected by a receiver (Rebecca) mounted in either an aircraft or glider F.J.R. - Fallschirmjäger Regiment FOO - Forward Observing Officer FOsB - Forward Observers Bombardment Gee - Bomber Command navigational device invented in 1942 GHQ - General Headquarters GOC - General Officer Commanding Gp - Group 5 Gren - Grenadier GSO - General Staff Officer HQ - Headquarters HMS - His Majesty’s Ship (RN) HMSO - Her Majesty’s Stationary Office I.D. – Infantry Division (German) Ind - Independent Inf - Infantry ITC - Infantry Training Centre IWM - Imperial War Museum Ju - Junkers Lt.Col - Lieutenant-Colonel LZ - Landing zone (glider or parachute) MC – Military Cross MMG - Medium Machine Gun (Vickers in the case of 6 Airborne Div) NCO - Non-commissioned officer OKW - OberKommando der Wehrmacht, the German Armed Forces Supreme Command OODA Loop - The phrase OODA loop refers to the decision cycle of observe, orient, decide, and act, developed by military strategist and USAF Colonel John Boyd ORs - Other Ranks Para – Parachute Pdr – Pounder PIAT - Projector infantry anti-tank Pl - Platoon Port. - Portal Papers, held at Christchurch College Oxford PP - Parliamentary Papers 6 Pz. - Panzer Pz. Gren – Panzer grenadier SS-Pz.Kps - SS Panzer Corps PTC - Primary Training Centre (GSC assessment centres) RAF - Royal Air Force RM - Royal Marine RN - Royal Navy RSM - Regimental Sergeant Major RTU - Returned to Unit RUSI - The Royal United services Institute RV - Rendezvous SHAEF - Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Force SMG- Submachine gun SOE - Special Operations Executive SPG - Self-propelled gun SPW - Schützenpanzerwagen (German AFV, usually a half track) SS (British) - Special Service troops – commandos SS (German) - Schütz Staffeln-Waffen SS troops SWWEC - Second World War Experience Centre TA - Territorial Army Ultra – Allied signals intelligence gathered through Bletchley Park VCAS - Vice Chief of Air Staff VCIGS - Vice Chief, Imperial General Staff VC – Victoria Cross WE - War Establishment WO - Warrant Officer 7 WO - War Office II. British Unit title abbreviations AAC - The Army Air Corps 6 AARR - 6 Airborne Armoured Reconnaissance Regiment 6 AL Bde - 6th Airlanding Brigade Border - The Border Regiment Camerons - The Queen’s Own Cameron Highlanders Coldstream - Coldstream Guards Devon - The Devonshire Regiment DCLI - The Duke of Cornwall’s Light Infantry DLI - The Durham Light Infantry Gren Gds - Grenadier Guards Green Howards – Green Howards Gds Armd Div - Guards Armoured Division GSC - General Service Corps Hamps - The Hampshire Regiment HLI - The Highland Light Infantry 13/18 H - (13th/18th) Hussars Indep Para Coy - Independent Parachute Company (pathfinders) King’s - The King’s Regiment (Liverpool) KOYLI - King’s Own Yorkshire Light Infantry KSLI - The King’s Shropshire Light Infantry KRRC - The King’s Royal Rifle Corps Leicesters - The Leicestershire Regiment MGC - Machine Gun Corps 8 Mx -The Middlesex Regiment Norfolk - The Royal Norfolk Regiment Northamptons - The Northamptonshire Regiment Oxf Bucks - The Oxford and Buckinghamshire Light infantry PWV - The South Lancashire Regiment RA - The Royal Regiment of Artillery RAC - Royal Armoured Corps RASC - Royal Army Service Corps RE - Corps of Royal Engineers REME - Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers RM - Royal Marines RUR - The Royal Ulster Rifles RWF - The Royal
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (British) Bibliography
    World War 2 (British) Bibliography Pegasus Bridge – Stephen E Ambrose *** Breaking the Panzers – The Bloody Battle For Rauray, Normandy, 1 July 1944 – Kevin Baverstock ***** Gunners At War 1939-1945 – Peter Beale ** Tank Tracks – 9th Battalion Royal Tank Regiment At War 1940-45 – Peter Beale **** Bataille de Caen – Jean-Pierre Benamou **** Battalion – A British Infantry Unit’s Actions From El Alamein To VE-Day – Alistair Borthwick **** Armoured Guardsmen – Robert Boscawen *** The British Soldier – From D-Day to VE-Day (Vols 1 & 2) – Jean Bouchery **** The Churchill Tank – Peter Chamberlain & Chris Ellis ** The Black Bull – From Normandy to the Baltic with the 11th Armoured Division – Patrick Delaforce **** Churchill’s Desert Rats – From Normandy to Berlin with the 7th Armoured Division – Patrick Delaforce **** Churchill’s Desert Rats 2 – North Africa, Italy and Burma with the 7th Armoured Division – Patrick Delaforce **** Churchill’s Secret Weapons – Patrick Delaforce *** Fighting Wessex Wyverns – From Normandy to Bremerhaven with the 43rd Division – Patrick Delaforce **** Marching To the Sound Of Gunfire – Patrick Delaforce ** Monty’s Highlanders – 51st (Highland) Division in WW2 – Patrick Delaforce *** Monty’s Ironsides – From the Normandy Beaches to Bremen with the 3rd Division – Patrick Delaforce **** Monty’s Marauders – ‘Black Rat’ 4th Armoured Brigade & ‘Red Fox’ 8th Armoured Brigade – Patrick Delaforce *** The Polar Bears (Monty’s Left Flank) – From Normandy to the Relief of Holland with the 49th Division – Patrick Delaforce ****
    [Show full text]
  • Iourgl).\~S • 20AT0712
    HIGH TIDE ~ LOW TIO[ -7-68 5-7-613 6 AT 1318 13ATI942 e I AT 0118 ~IOURGl).\~S • 20AT0712 K\oIAJAlEIN. MA.RSHALL ISLANDS MOttO ... T M... v 6, 1968 WASHINGTON (UP1)--PI!ESIDENT JOHN­ Saigon Fighting in Secon~ Day; SON SUMMONED AMBASSADO~S AVERELL HAII_ Tax Increase Approved RI~AN AND CYRUS VANCE TO THE WHITE HoUSE TODAY TO DISCUSS THE FORTHCOM­ With Spending Cut Red Offensive on Nation-Wide Scale ING US TALKS WITH NORTH VIET NAM IN SAIGON (UPI)~~NoRTH VIETNAMESE: AND VIET CONG TROOPS FIGHTING AT THE EDGE or PARIS WASHINGTON (lfIl)--THE SENATE ... ND HOUSEl THE CAPITAL FIRED AT LEAST SIX ROCI\[TS AN~ MORTAR INTO HI[ HEART or SAIGON TO- THE TWO EN~OYS WHO H~~t 6EEN N~MEO T ... )(WRITERS, WHO BLOCKED PRESIOENT JOHN­ BY THE PRESIDENT TO REPRESENT TtlE SON'S PROPOSED TAX SURCH ... RGE FOR NINE '" US. MILITARY POLICE SAID THE SHELLS STRUCK THE CITY FOLLOWING DAY-LONG FIGHT- UNITED ST~TES IN THE INITI~L DISCUS· MONTHS, CHANGED THEIR "'INDS TODAY AND ING 4ROUNO THE Ol;TSKIRTS, BUT rOR THE SECOND TIME IN THEIR 1'''O_O"Y OFfENSIVE THE SIONS WITH. NORTH VIErN~MESE DIPLOMATS, ... PPROVED ... $10 BILLION INCOME HX IN_ COMMUNISTS FAilED TO STRIKE MAJOR TARGETS ARE EXPECTED TO LEAVE rOR PARIS SHORT- CREASE COUPLED WITH'" $4 BILLION SPEND­ THE SHELLS CAME WHIRLING INTO THE CITY BEFORE MIDNIGHT AND MORE T~N AN HOUR ING CUT LATER THE ~S S~IO THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF C~SU~LTIES fRENCH GOVERNMENT SOURCES S~IO TO· THE "'CTION BY THE HOUSE WAYS ..
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • JCLD Fall 2020
    )$// 92/80(_,668( (GLWRULQ&KLHI 'U'RXJODV/LQGVD\/W&RO 5HW 86$) &(17(5)25&+$5$&7(5 /($'(56+,3'(9(/230(17 EDITORIAL STAFF: EDITORIAL BOARD: Center for Creative Leadership Dr. Douglas Lindsay, Lt Col (Ret), USAF Dr. David Altman, Editor in Chief Dr. Marvin Berkowitz, University of Missouri- St. Louis Dr. John Abbatiello, Col (Ret), USAF Book Review Editor Dr. Dana Born, Harvard University (Brig Gen, USAF, Retired) Dr. Stephen Randolph Dr. David Day, Claremont McKenna College Profiles in Leadership Editor Dr. Shannon French, Case Western Julie Imada Associate Editor & CCLD Strategic Dr. William Gardner, Texas Tech University Communications Chief Mr. Chad Hennings, Hennings Management Corp JCLD is published at the United States Air Mr. Max James, American Kiosk Management Force Academy, Colorado Springs, Colorado. Articles in JCLD may be reproduced in whole Dr. Barbara Kellerman, Harvard University or in part without permission. A standard Dr. Robert Kelley, Carnegie Mellon University source credit line is required for each reprint or citation. Dr. Richard M. Lerner, Tufts University For information about the Journal of Character Ms. Cathy McClain, Association of Graduates and Leadership Development or the U.S. Air (Colonel, USAF, Retired) Force Academy’s Center for Character and Dr. Michael Mumford, University of Oklahoma Leadership Development or to be added to the Journal’s electronic subscription list, contact Dr. Gary Packard, University of Arizona (Brig Gen, us at: [email protected] USAF, Retired) Phone: 719-333-4904 Dr. George Reed, University of Colorado at The Journal of Character & Leadership Colorado Springs (Colonel, USA, Retired) Development The Center for Character & Leadership Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Information Research Department, British Covert Propaganda, and the Sino- Indian War of 1962: Combatting Communism and Courting Failure?
    The Information Research Department, British Covert Propaganda, and the Sino- Indian War of 1962: Combatting Communism and Courting Failure? Paul M. McGarr Department of American and Canadian Studies University of Nottingham University Park Nottingham NG7 2RD Tel. 0115 8232265 [email protected] 1 ABSTRACT Britain’s post-war interventions in former colonial territories remain a controversial area of contemporary history. In the case of India, recent releases of official records in the United Kingdom and South Asia have revealed details of British government anti-communist propaganda activity in the subcontinent during the Cold War period. This article focuses attention on covert or unattributable propaganda conducted in India by the Foreign Office’s Information Research Department (IRD). It specifically examines the 1960s: a time between the outbreak of the Sino-Indian border war in 1962, and the Indian general election of 1967, when IRD operations peaked. The Indian government welcomed British support in an information war waged against Communist China, but cooperation between London and New Delhi quickly waned. Britain’s propaganda initiative in India lacked strategic coherence, and cut across the grain of local resistance to anti-Soviet material. The British Government found itself running two separate propaganda campaigns in the subcontinent: one focused on Communist China, and declared to the Indian government; and a second, secret programme, targeting the Soviets. In this context, Whitehall found it difficult to implement an integrated and effective anti-communist propaganda offensive in India. Key words: Information Research Department; India; China; Sino-Indian War; propaganda. Whitehall’s post-war interventions in Britain’s former colonial territories remain a controversial area of contemporary history.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Infantry Combat Training During the Second World War
    SHARPENING THE SABRE: CANADIAN INFANTRY COMBAT TRAINING DURING THE SECOND WORLD WAR By R. DANIEL PELLERIN BBA (Honours), Wilfrid Laurier University, 2007 BA (Honours), Wilfrid Laurier University, 2008 MA, University of Waterloo, 2009 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in History University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ontario, Canada © Raymond Daniel Ryan Pellerin, Ottawa, Canada, 2016 ii ABSTRACT “Sharpening the Sabre: Canadian Infantry Combat Training during the Second World War” Author: R. Daniel Pellerin Supervisor: Serge Marc Durflinger 2016 During the Second World War, training was the Canadian Army’s longest sustained activity. Aside from isolated engagements at Hong Kong and Dieppe, the Canadians did not fight in a protracted campaign until the invasion of Sicily in July 1943. The years that Canadian infantry units spent training in the United Kingdom were formative in the history of the Canadian Army. Despite what much of the historical literature has suggested, training succeeded in making the Canadian infantry capable of succeeding in battle against German forces. Canadian infantry training showed a definite progression towards professionalism and away from a pervasive prewar mentality that the infantry was a largely unskilled arm and that training infantrymen did not require special expertise. From 1939 to 1941, Canadian infantry training suffered from problems ranging from equipment shortages to poor senior leadership. In late 1941, the Canadians were introduced to a new method of training called “battle drill,” which broke tactical manoeuvres into simple movements, encouraged initiative among junior leaders, and greatly boosted the men’s morale.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    Notes 1 Introduction 1. Donald Macintyre, Narvik (London: Evans, 1959), p. 15. 2. See Olav Riste, The Neutral Ally: Norway’s Relations with Belligerent Powers in the First World War (London: Allen and Unwin, 1965). 3. Reflections of the C-in-C Navy on the Outbreak of War, 3 September 1939, The Fuehrer Conferences on Naval Affairs, 1939–45 (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1990), pp. 37–38. 4. Report of the C-in-C Navy to the Fuehrer, 10 October 1939, in ibid. p. 47. 5. Report of the C-in-C Navy to the Fuehrer, 8 December 1939, Minutes of a Conference with Herr Hauglin and Herr Quisling on 11 December 1939 and Report of the C-in-C Navy, 12 December 1939 in ibid. pp. 63–67. 6. MGFA, Nichols Bohemia, n 172/14, H. W. Schmidt to Admiral Bohemia, 31 January 1955 cited by Francois Kersaudy, Norway, 1940 (London: Arrow, 1990), p. 42. 7. See Andrew Lambert, ‘Seapower 1939–40: Churchill and the Strategic Origins of the Battle of the Atlantic, Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 17, no. 1 (1994), pp. 86–108. 8. For the importance of Swedish iron ore see Thomas Munch-Petersen, The Strategy of Phoney War (Stockholm: Militärhistoriska Förlaget, 1981). 9. Churchill, The Second World War, I, p. 463. 10. See Richard Wiggan, Hunt the Altmark (London: Hale, 1982). 11. TMI, Tome XV, Déposition de l’amiral Raeder, 17 May 1946 cited by Kersaudy, p. 44. 12. Kersaudy, p. 81. 13. Johannes Andenæs, Olav Riste and Magne Skodvin, Norway and the Second World War (Oslo: Aschehoug, 1966), p.
    [Show full text]
  • United Kingdom Defence Statistics 2010
    UNITED KINGDOM DEFENCE STATISTICS 2010 th Published: 29 September 2010 DASA (WDS) Tel: 020-7807-8792 Ministry of Defence Fax: 020-7218-0969 Floor 3 Zone K Mil: 9621 78792 Main Building, Whitehall E-mail: [email protected] London SW1A 2HB Web site: http://www.dasa.mod.uk INTRODUCTION Welcome to the 2010 edition of UK Defence Statistics, the annual statistical compendium published by the Ministry of Defence. Changes to UK Defence Statistics (UKDS) this year include a new section on Defence Inflation and an expanded International Defence section in Chapter 1, the restructuring of the Armed Forces Personnel section in Chapter 2, and a new section on Amputations in Chapter 3. UK Defence Statistics (UKDS) is a National Statistics publication, produced according to the standards of the Official Statistics Code of Practice. However some of the tables in UKDS do not have National Statistics status – some are produced by areas outside of the scope of the Government Statistical Service; some do not yet meet all the quality standards of the Official Statistics Code of Practice; and others have not gone through the required assessment process to be classed as National Statistics. All such tables are clearly marked with explanatory notes. This year UKDS is once again being issued as a web document only, due to financial constraints within the Ministry of Defence. Each table and chapter is available in pdf format which is suitable for printing. There is also a pdf version of the entire publication, and of the UKDS factsheet. We have ceased publication of the UKDS pocket cards this year, since they are of limited value in electronic format.
    [Show full text]
  • (Free) Panzer Commander: the Memoirs of Hans Von Luck Panzer Ace: the Memoirs of an Iron Cross Panzer Commander
    [PDF-9yh]Panzer Commander: The Memoirs of Hans von Luck Panzer Commander: The Memoirs of Hans von Luck Panzer Commander: The Memoirs of Colonel Hans Von Luck ... Hans von Luck - Wikipedia Panzer Ace: The Memoirs of an Iron Cross Panzer Commander ... Fri, 19 Oct 2018 03:08:00 GMT Panzer Commander: The Memoirs of Colonel Hans Von Luck ... Panzer Commander: The Memoirs of Colonel Hans Von Luck (World War II Library) [Hans Von Luck, Stephen E. Ambrose] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. A stunning look at World War II from the other side... From the turret of a German tank, Colonel Hans von Luck commanded Rommel's 7th and then 21st Panzer Division. El Alamein Hans von Luck - Wikipedia Hans–Ulrich Freiherr von Luck und Witten (15 July 1911 – 1 August 1997), usually shortened to Hans von Luck, was a German officer in the Wehrmacht of Nazi Germany during World War II.Luck served with the 7th Panzer Division and 21st Panzer Division.Luck is author of the book Panzer Commander (Free) Panzer Commander: The Memoirs of Hans von Luck Panzer Ace: The Memoirs of an Iron Cross Panzer Commander ... Richard Freiherr von Rosen was a highly decorated Wehrmacht soldier and outstanding panzer commander. After serving as a gunlayer on a Pz.Mk.III during Barbarossa, he led a Company of Tigers at Kursk. Download Wed, 31 Oct 2018 22:42:00 GMT Heinz Guderian - Wikipedia Heinz Wilhelm Guderian (German: [?u?de??i?an]; 17 June 1888 – 14 May 1954) was a German general during the Nazi era.An early pioneer and advocate of the "blitzkrieg" (lightning war) doctrine, he successfully led Panzer (armoured) units during the Invasion of Poland, the Battle of France, and Operation Barbarossa, the invasion of the Soviet Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Market Garden WWII
    Operation Market Garden WWII Operation Market Garden (17–25 September 1944) was an Allied military operation, fought in the Netherlands and Germany in the Second World War. It was the largest airborne operation up to that time. The operation plan's strategic context required the seizure of bridges across the Maas (Meuse River) and two arms of the Rhine (the Waal and the Lower Rhine) as well as several smaller canals and tributaries. Crossing the Lower Rhine would allow the Allies to outflank the Siegfried Line and encircle the Ruhr, Germany's industrial heartland. It made large-scale use of airborne forces, whose tactical objectives were to secure a series of bridges over the main rivers of the German- occupied Netherlands and allow a rapid advance by armored units into Northern Germany. Initially, the operation was marginally successful and several bridges between Eindhoven and Nijmegen were captured. However, Gen. Horrocks XXX Corps ground force's advance was delayed by the demolition of a bridge over the Wilhelmina Canal, as well as an extremely overstretched supply line, at Son, delaying the capture of the main road bridge over the Meuse until 20 September. At Arnhem, the British 1st Airborne Division encountered far stronger resistance than anticipated. In the ensuing battle, only a small force managed to hold one end of the Arnhem road bridge and after the ground forces failed to relieve them, they were overrun on 21 September. The rest of the division, trapped in a small pocket west of the bridge, had to be evacuated on 25 September. The Allies had failed to cross the Rhine in sufficient force and the river remained a barrier to their advance until the offensives at Remagen, Oppenheim, Rees and Wesel in March 1945.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Print Version (PDF)
    The The night of 6 December 1943 in southeastern North Carolina was cold with a nearly-full moon. Towns in Moore, Hoke, Scotland and Richmond counties were blacked out by Army request. Road networks from Knollwood Cameron to Rockingham, Eastwood to Laurinburg, West End to Raeford and Hamlet to Hoffman had been closed to all civilian traffic from 7 p.m. to 2 a.m. Approaching from the east, a large armada of C-47 Maneuver: aircraft carrying paratroopers or towing gliders was nearing the Knollwood Army Auxiliary Airfield near Pinehurst, NC. Aboard one glider was Major (MAJ) The Ultimate Robert L. Johnson, six enlisted glider artillerymen and a jeep from the 675th Glider Field Artillery (GFA) Battalion of the 11th Airborne Division. They were part of the Airborne Test airborne invasion force launched to capture Knollwood Airfield. In the early morning hours of 7 December By Eugene G. Piasecki 1943, MAJ Johnson’s glider pilot released the tow line and began the descent toward his landing zone along N.C. Route 5 between Aberdeen and Pinehurst, NC.1 After hitting the landing zone, the glider skimmed across a field hitting a farmhouse that sheared off its left wing. It stopped and settled “tail-up”. No one was injured in the farmhouse or the glider. MAJ Johnson and the soldiers scrambled out to get the tail down, lifted up the nose compartment and freed the jeep. This accomplished, Johnson drove off to locate the battalion’s twelve 75mm pack howitzers and crews. This glider landing during the Knollwood Maneuver was typical for the “Blue” Force elements.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Boterdijk
    12 Boterdijk At Boterdijk, near Roermondsplein, is an Airborne pillar, a memorial to the 1st and 3rd Parachute Battalions and their efforts in the after- noon of 18 and the morning of 19 September 1944 to join their com- rades at the bridge. The pillar marks the farthest point these British parachutists managed to reach. After the Rhine Bridge’s northern ramp was secured by British units in the evening and night of the 17th, other troops made further at- tempts to break through to the bridge over the following days in or- der to bolster the allied positions. On Monday 18 September two groups from the 3rd Parachute Battalion would get as far as Boter- dijk. Involved was a group led by Lieutenant John Dickson and a group led by Major Anthony Deane-Drummond. Next day they would be taken prisoner. On Tuesday 19 September companies of the 1st Parachute Battalion tried to get to the Rhine Bridge. ‘S’ Company ca- me to within 800 metres of the Rhine Bridge, but by then had too few men and too little fire-power to continue its advance. In this sto- ry the tale of these groups is depicted using war diaries and recollec- tions of British soldiers who were there. Dickson’s group Deane-Drummond’s group Units of the 1st Parachute Battalion in the attack 'S' Company R Company Making the balance Dickson’s group Map showing the situation around Boterdijk in 1944 (Copyright Cartographic Bureau MAP/Bert Stamkot) In the afternoon of 18 September the 3rd Parachute Battalion failed in its efforts to break through the German defence line al- ong Noordelijke Parallelweg and over Utrechtseweg.
    [Show full text]