DOCSLIB.ORG

Coordinator-General's Report on Project Changes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coordinator-General's Report on Project Changes The Legacy Way Project (formerly known as Northern Link Road Tunnel) Coordinator-General’s report on project changes December 2010 Looking forward. Delivering now. The Department of Infrastructure and Planning leads a coordinated Queensland Government approach to planning, infrastructure and development across the state. © State of Queensland. Published by the Department of Infrastructure and Planning, December 2010, 100 George Street, Brisbane Qld 4000. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of information. However, copyright protects this publication. The State of Queensland has no objection to this material being reproduced, made available online or electronically but only if it is recognised as the owner of the copyright and this material remains unaltered. Copyright inquiries about this publication should be directed to the department’s Legal Services division via email [email protected] or in writing to PO Box 15009, City East, Queensland 4002. The Queensland Government is committed to providing accessible services to Queenslanders of all cultural and linguistic backgrounds. If you have difficulty understanding this publication and need a translator, please call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National) on 131 450 and ask them to telephone the Queensland Department of Infrastructure and Planning on 07 3227 8548. Disclaimer: While every care has been taken in preparing this publication, the State of Queensland accepts no responsibility for decisions or actions taken as a result of any data, information, statement or advice, expressed or implied, contained within. To the best of our knowledge, the content was correct at the time of publishing. Any references to legislation are not an interpretation of the law. They are to be used as a guide only. The information in this publication is general and does not take into account individual circumstances or situations. Where appropriate, independent legal advice should be sought. SPC_0077_.004_Pu The Legacy Way Project (formerly known as Northern Link Road Tunnel) - ii - Coordinator-General’s report on project changes Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................5 1.1 Background ..............................................................................................5 1.2 The proponent..........................................................................................5 2 Description of proposed changes...........................................................7 2.1 Construction method changes..................................................................7 2.2 Project changes: Overview.......................................................................7 3 Public notification and consultation ......................................................16 3.1 Public notification ...................................................................................16 3.2 Analysis of submissions received...........................................................16 4 Evaluation of environmental effects .....................................................18 4.1 Transport and traffic ...............................................................................18 4.2 Spoil delivery: conveyor to quarry ..........................................................23 4.3 Centenary Motorway interface ...............................................................26 4.4 ICB interface...........................................................................................30 4.5 Alignment changes.................................................................................35 4.6 Tollroad control centre............................................................................45 4.7 Workforce parking: Anzac Park..............................................................45 4.8 Miscellaneous.........................................................................................52 5 Conclusion ...........................................................................................55 Appendix 1 : Conditions and recommendations ...........................................59 Appendix 2 : Complete list of conditions: December 2010............................69 Figures Figure 2.1 General alignment—changed project .................................................................. 9 Figure 2.2 Changed project—eastern connection overview............................................... 13 Figure 4.1 Western worksite ............................................................................................... 21 Figure 4.2 Changed project—spoil conveyor route and stockpile design........................... 24 Figure 4.3 Proposed temporary workforce construction parking – Anzac Park.................. 47 Tables Table 3.1 Public and agency comments on the project changes ...................................... 16 Table 3.2 Key issues: private individuals........................................................................... 17 Table 4.1 Overview: truck movements: western and eastern worksites ........................... 19 Table 4.2 Overview: truck movement changes: western and eastern worksites............... 20 The Legacy Way Project (formerly known as Northern Link Road Tunnel) Coordinator-General’s report on project changes - iii- The Legacy Way Project (formerly known as Northern Link Road Tunnel) - 4 - Coordinator-General’s report on project changes 1 Introduction 1.1 Background The Legacy Way, (LW) formerly known as the Northern Link Road Tunnel Project,1 will involve construction of two tunnels, both under five kilometres in length, linking the Centenary Motorway at Toowong with the Inner City Bypass (ICB) at Kelvin Grove. The project also includes associated works such as two ventilation stations and outlets and a tollroad control centre (TCC). LW was declared to be a significant project under section 26(1)(a) of the State Development and Public Works Organisation Act 1971 (the SDPWO Act) on 2 November 2007. Following consideration of the project’s environmental impact statement (EIS) and comments made on the EIS by members of the public, stakeholders and government agencies, the Coordinator-General’s report evaluating the EIS was completed on 23 April 2010. The report found that the project could proceed, subject to compliance with conditions and recommendations made by the Coordinator-General to mitigate project impacts. The report noted that the proponent had not yet chosen its construction contractor, but that the successful tenderer would be responsible for the project’s detailed design. Accordingly, any amendments to the reference design (RD) assessed during the EIS process would likely require a Coordinator-General’s project change report, prepared under Part 4, Division 3A of the SDPWO Act. On 25 October 2010, the proponent provided the Department of Infrastructure and Planning (DIP) with an application for project changes (APC) as per section 35C of the Act. The application requested the Coordinator-General assess proposed design and delivery changes. On 30 October 2010, the Department of Infrastructure and Planning (DIP) advertised a request for submissions from the public on the project changes, with submissions invited until 19 November 2010. On 29 November 2010 Brisbane City Council (BCC) supplied the Coordinator- General with further information on the project changes (FIAPC) in a document that responded to key issues raised in submissions. This document, the Coordinator-General’s report on the Legacy Way project changes, provides the Coordinator-General’s decision on the project changes. The assessment has been made having regard to the SDPWO Act, the APC, the FIAPC, discussion and correspondence between the proponent and DIP, the EIS, public 1 The project was re-named by the Lord Mayor on 10 November 2010, with a pledge to provide part of toll charges to support Legacy. The Legacy Way Project (formerly known as Northern Link Road Tunnel) Coordinator-General’s report on project changes - 5 - submissions and comment, input received from government agencies on the changes, and an independent review of the alignment changes undertaken by Parsons Brinckerhoff. 1.2 The proponent The project proponent is Brisbane City Council (BCC). On 20 September 2010, BCC selected a preferred contractor for the design, construction, operation and maintenance of the project. The contractor is Transcity Joint Venture (Transcity), which includes the Spanish infrastructure company, Acciona, Australian construction firm, BMD Constructions, and Italian tunnelling experts, Ghella. Transcity has been contracted to deliver and operate the project as BCC’s agent for a 10-year period. The Legacy Way Project (formerly known as Northern Link Road Tunnel) - 6 - Coordinator-General’s report on project changes 2 Description of proposed changes As part of its winning bid, Transcity proposed various changes to the project’s RD related to design and delivery methods. Its rationale was to increase project efficiencies while working to reduce the cost of public-funded infrastructure. The tendered design is substantially the same as the RD and is consistent with the original project’s objectives. Following is an overview of the key project changes proposed by Transcity in the APC. Section 4: Evaluation of environmental effects, provides an assessment of the changes. 2.1 Construction method changes For the tunnels, the key construction method has changed. Both tunnels
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 143 Coronation Drive Milton Introduction Knight Frank and Colliers Are Extremely Proud to Present 143 Coronation Drive, Available for Sub-Lease Or Direct Lease
    CDOP2 Overview CDOP2, 143 Coronation NLA (m2) 7,143 Drive benefits from its No. of levels 6 2 prime location. Typical floor size (m ) 1,256 Site area (m2) 3,495 It places tenants on Brisbane’s busy Coronation No. of car spaces 164 Drive and beside some of Australia’s leading Car park ratio 1:44m2 businesses who share the Precinct. The building offers six levels of prestige office accommodation and two levels of secure basement car parking. It provides an optimum working environment for all employees and creates a big impression with clients. CORONATION DRIVE OFFICE PARK I CDOP I PAGE 15 FOR LEASE INFORMATION MEMORANDUM 143 coronation drive milton Introduction Knight Frank and Colliers are extremely proud to present 143 Coronation Drive, available for sub-lease or direct lease. 143 Coronation Drive forms part of the prestigious Coronation Drive Office Park in Milton. Coronation Drive Office Park is widely recognised as Brisbane’s premier business office park only a very short distance from the Brisbane CBD. Tenants benefit from being close to a range of services and amenities in a unique campus style environment. The park boasts of some of Australia’s leading businesses across a broad range of industries, and the location and amenities provide an optimum working environment for every business or employee. 143 coronation drive milton Building 143 Coronation Drive is perfectly positioned to take advantage of panoramic Brisbane river and Brisbane CBD views. Situated on a prominent edge of the business park, the building has great exposure to passing traffic along Coronation Drive creating excellent signage opportunities and recognition for your business.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Heritage Register
    Explanatory Notes for Development Assessment Local Heritage Register Amendments to the Queensland Heritage Act 1992, Schedule 8 and 8A of the Integrated Planning Act 1997, the Integrated Planning Regulation 1998, and the Queensland Heritage Regulation 2003 became effective on 31 March 2008. All aspects of development on a Local Heritage Place in a Local Heritage Register under the Queensland Heritage Act 1992, are code assessable (unless City Plan 2000 requires impact assessment). Those code assessable applications are assessed against the Code in Schedule 2 of the Queensland Heritage Regulation 2003 and the Heritage Place Code in City Plan 2000. City Plan 2000 makes some aspects of development impact assessable on the site of a Heritage Place and a Heritage Precinct. Heritage Places and Heritage Precincts are identified in the Heritage Register of the Heritage Register Planning Scheme Policy in City Plan 2000. Those impact assessable applications are assessed under the relevant provisions of the City Plan 2000. All aspects of development on land adjoining a Heritage Place or Heritage Precinct are assessable solely under City Plan 2000. ********** For building work on a Local Heritage Place assessable against the Building Act 1975, the Local Government is a concurrence agency. ********** Amendments to the Local Heritage Register are located at the back of the Register. G:\C_P\Heritage\Legal Issues\Amendments to Heritage legislation\20080512 Draft Explanatory Document.doc LOCAL HERITAGE REGISTER (for Section 113 of the Queensland Heritage
    [Show full text]
  • Legacy Way Tunnel
    Groundwater Level Monitoring Transurban Limited 28-Mar-2018 Doc No. 001 Legacy Way Tunnel Groundwater Level Monitoring (February 2018) 28-Mar-2018 Prepared for – Transurban Limited – ABN: 96 098 143 410 AECOM Groundwater Level Monitoring Legacy Way Tunnel Legacy Way Tunnel Groundwater Level Monitoring (February 2018) Client: Transurban Limited ABN: 96 098 143 410 Prepared by AECOM Australia Pty Ltd Level 8, 540 Wickham Street, PO Box 1307, Fortitude Valley QLD 4006, Australia T +61 7 3553 2000 F +61 7 3553 2050 www.aecom.com ABN 20 093 846 925 28-Mar-2018 Job No.: 60558039 AECOM in Australia and New Zealand is certified to ISO9001, ISO14001 AS/NZS4801 and OHSAS18001. © AECOM Australia Pty Ltd (AECOM). All rights reserved. AECOM has prepared this document for the sole use of the Client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other party should rely on this document without the prior written consent of AECOM. AECOM undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document. This document has been prepared based on the Client’s description of its requirements and AECOM’s experience, having regard to assumptions that AECOM can reasonably be expected to make in accordance with sound professional principles. AECOM may also have relied upon information provided by the Client and other third parties to prepare this document, some of which may not have been verified. Subject to the above conditions, this document may be transmitted, reproduced or disseminated only
    [Show full text]
  • Mixed Evidence from Two Inner City Areas in Brisbane Simon Huston
    Urban Design and Boosterism of Property Sub-Markets: Mixed Evidence from Two Inner City Areas in Brisbane Simon Huston And Marek Kozlowski School Of Geography, Planning And Architecture University Of Queensland, St Lucia Qld 4072, Australia Abstract In recent years Australia has witnessed a spate of inner city revitalisation projects as part of a general trend in urban renewal. Inner city redevelopments have transformed parts of Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and other Australian cities. In this article we explore the impact of urban design, one of the tools of the redevelopment process, on the property market by considering two major projects in inner Brisbane where the selected sites and adjacent neighbourhoods have evolved from working class into upper-middle and high-income class enclaves. We also investigate relationships between the changing urban environment and property prices of the two studied redevelopment sites and their surrounding areas. The paper provides some mixed evidence that urban design master planned inner city enclaves might boost property prices however evidence is inconclusive because property submarkets in the two locations are segmented by heterogeneity of building stock, accessibility and the effects of urban blight. Inner City Transformation in Australia The past two decades have witnessed a major shift in urban policies towards refurbishing the decaying inner city areas. Although there is no question that inner city redevelopments improve and enhance degraded built environments, there is mounting criticism that such transformations cater to only a select group of the community. Further, they often result in disconnection from the remaining fabric of the city (Fainstein 1994, Marshall 2003, Meyer 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Project Description
    BaT project Chapter 3 Project description Contents 3. Project Description ................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Overview ...................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.3 Objective and benefits ................................................................................................. 3-1 3.4 Location........................................................................................................................ 3-2 3.4.1 Transport corridor ......................................................................................................... 3-2 3.4.2 Study corridor ............................................................................................................... 3-2 3.5 Adjacent or adjoining infrastructure ............................................................................. 3-2 3.5.1 Existing infrastructure ................................................................................................... 3-2 3.5.2 Other major projects ..................................................................................................... 3-4 3.6 Design .......................................................................................................................... 3-4 3.6.1 Overview ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Link Road Tunnel
    Coordinator-General’s report Northern Link Road Tunnel Released: April 2010 Report evaluating the Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to section 35(3) of the State Development and Public Works Organisation Act 1971 Coordinator-General’s report – Northern Link Road Tunnel project Contents Synopsis.........................................................................................................4 1. Introduction.............................................................................................6 2. Project description .................................................................................7 2.1 The proponent ...................................................................................7 2.2 Project description .............................................................................7 2.3 Rationale for the project.....................................................................8 3. The impact assessment process............................................................11 3.1 Significant project declaration and controlled action........................11 3.2 Terms of reference for the EIS ........................................................11 3.3 Public notification of the EIS ............................................................12 3.4 Submissions on the EIS...................................................................12 3.5 Change to the project after the EIS..................................................13 3.6 Review of the further information provided (supplementary report to
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf, 531.5 KB
    Heritage Information Please contact us for more information about this place: [email protected] -OR- phone 07 3403 8888 Combined Services Detailed Interrogation Centre (former) (Witton Barracks) - 650030 Key details Also known as Indooroopilly Barracks Addresses At 9 Lambert Road, Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068 Type of place Defence site Period World War II 1939-1945 Lot plan L13_SP108539 Date of Citation — July 2010 Page 1 Key dates Local Heritage Place Since — 30 November 2012 Date of Citation — July 2010 Construction Walls: Masonry People/associations Department of the Army (Architect) Criterion for listing (A) Historical; (B) Rarity; (D) Representative; (G) Social; (G) Social Requisitioned in 1942, the site became the Australian headquarters of the Allied Translator and Interpreter Service (ATIS). Japanese and German POWs were brought here for interrogation prior to imprisonment in the southern states. The military purchased the site in 1945. In 1951 it became the Northern Command Provost Company’s barracks. It changed its name from Indooroopilly Barracks to Witton Barracks during the 1980s. History The Commonwealth requisitioned the site from the Queensland Government’s Public Trustees Limited on October 1942. The Public Trustee was administering this property as part of the estate of H.B. Hemming who died on 8 March 1942. The property had, previously been put up for auction on 15 July but was withdrawn from sale, with a new land evaluation conducted by Blocksidge & Ferguson in August. The site included two residences ‘Tighnabruaich’ and ‘Witton House’ that overlooked the Brisbane River. ‘Tighnabruaich’ was built in 1892. The earlier (1860s) ‘Witton House’ was moved onto the property from elsewhere in Indooroopilly in 1915.
    [Show full text]
  • ASX Release Template 2016-9 New Logo
    asx release 31 October 2016 TRANSURBAN QUEENSLAND EURO MEDIUM TERM NOTE PROGRAMME UPDATE Transurban announces that Transurban Queensland, in which Transurban has a 62.5% interest, has updated its Euro Medium Term Note Programme today by lodging the following Second Supplemental Offering Circular with the Singapore Exchange. Amanda Street Company Secretary Investor enquiries Jessica O’Brien Investor Relations Manager +61 3 8656 8364 For personal use only Classification Transurban Group Transurban International Limited ABN 90 121 746 825 Transurban Holdings Limited ABN 86 098 143 429 Level 23 Transurban Holding Trust Tower One, Collins Square ABN 30 169 362 255 727 Collins Street Docklands ARSN 098 807 419 Victoria 3008 Australia [email protected] Telephone +613 8656 8900 www.transurban.com Facsimile +613 9649 7380 IMPORTANT NOTICE NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO ANY U.S. PERSON OR TO ANY PERSON OR ADDRESS IN THE U.S. IMPORTANT: You must read the following before continuing. The following applies to the supplemental offering circular following this page, and you are therefore advised to read this carefully before reading, accessing or making any other use of the supplemental offering circular. In accessing the supplemental offering circular, you agree to be bound by the following terms and conditions, including any modifications to them any time you receive any information from us as a result of such access. NOTHING IN THIS ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION CONSTITUTES AN OFFER OF SECURITIES FOR SALE IN THE UNITED STATES OR ANY OTHER JURISDICTION WHERE IT IS UNLAWFUL TO DO SO. THE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN, AND WILL NOT BE, REGISTERED UNDER THE U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 27Th ARRB Full Paper Sae
    27th ARRB Conference – Linking people, places and opportunities, Melbourne, Victoria 2016 COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY ON COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS FOR TOLL ROAD PROJECTS Chi, S., Bunker, J., Kajewski, S., Queensland University of Technology, Australia ABSTRACT Project evaluation is a process to measure impacts and risks of a project as a public good. Cost-Benefit Analysis is a most commonly used project evaluation methodology for major road projects. Cost-Benefit Analysis conducted for Australian toll road projects have tended to mirror those for non-toll road projects, because they generally treat tolls as a financial transfer. However, a number of project impacts and risk characteristics are unique to toll road projects. It is therefore hypothesised that Cost-Benefit Analysis for toll road projects should treat tolls uniquely, on the basis that risk allocations and concession arrangements are different. This paper reviews Cost-Benefit Analysis methodologies used to evaluate major public road projects. Examining the treatment of project impacts and risks in practice, and the outcomes of the analyses revealed both the advantages and limitations of each extant Cost-Benefit Analysis methodology used in practice. Moreover, the suitability of different methodologies in terms of Cost-Benefit Analysis for toll roads was assessed by studying project characteristics and risk characteristics of each project. Identifying an appropriate treatment of tolls contributes to determining an appropriate Cost-Benefit Analysis methodology for toll road projects. The refined methodology would ensure that all relevant impacts and risks of the toll road project are addressed in decision-making. This will provide a basis for ensuring that the full and true impact to the community is properly assessed.
    [Show full text]
  • Former Gona Barracks Kelvin Grove
    FORMER GONA BARRACKS KELVIN GROVE FORMER GONA BARRACKS A Conservation Plan for the Queensland University of Technology ■ © COPYRIGHT Allom Lovell Pty Ltd, November 2004 G:\Projects\04015 CreativeInd QUT\Reports\r02.doc FORMER GONA BARRACKS CONTENTS ■ i 1 INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 BACKGROUND 4 1.2 HERITAGE LISTINGS 5 1.3 THIS REPORT 6 THE SITE 6 1.4 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 7 2 UNDERSTANDING THE PLACE 8 2.1 A MILITARY BARRACKS 8 THE ENDOWMENT 8 FEDERATION AND DEFENCE 9 THE KELVIN GROVE DEFENCE RESERVE 11 THE INTERWAR PERIOD 13 THE SECOND WORLD WAR 16 REGULARS AND RESERVES 19 DISPOSAL OF THE BARRACKS 21 2.2 THE URBAN VILLAGE 22 DEMOLITION 23 CREATIVE INDUSTRIES 23 2.3 THE EARLY BUILDINGS 24 FORMER INFANTRY DRILL HALL (A25) 24 FORMER SERVICES DRILL HALL (A16) 25 THE FRANK MORAN MEMORIAL HALL (A21) 25 FORMER GARAGE AND WORKSHOP BUILDING (A26) 26 FORMER DINING ROOM (A31) 26 FORMER BRIGADE OFFICE (C39) 26 FORMER ARTILLERY DRILL HALL (C39) 27 FORMER GUN PARK (C33) 28 FORMER TOOWONG DRILL HALL (A3) 28 ANCILLARY BUILDINGS 29 THE PARADE GROUND 29 FORMER GONA BARRACKS CONTENTS ■ ii 2.4 VEGETATION 29 3 UNDERSTANDING CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE 31 3.1 CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE 31 3.2 ANALYSIS 31 MILITARY BARRACKS 31 DRILL HALLS 33 3.3 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE 38 EXTENT OF SIGNIFICANCE 39 3.4 PREVIOUS ASSESSMENTS 40 4 CONSERVATION POLICY 44 4.1 GENERAL PRINCIPLES 44 THE BURRA CHARTER 44 ENDORSEMENT AND REVIEW 45 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS 45 SCOPE OF POLICIES 46 4.2 APPROACH 46 4.3 CONSERVATION OF BUILDING FABRIC 48 4.4 ADAPTATION OF BUILDING FABRIC 48 CREATIVE INDUSTRIES PRECINCT 49 4.5 REMOVAL OF BUILDINGS 49 4.6 NEW USES 50 4.7 NEW CONSTRUCTION 50 FORMER GONA BARRACKS CONTENTS ■ iii THE PARADE GROUND 50 4.8 INTERPRETATION 51 5 APPENDIX 52 5.1 NOTES 52 FORMER GONA BARRACKS 1 INTRODUCTION ■ 4 1 INTRODUCTION he former Gona Barracks is currently being redeveloped as part of T the Kelvin Grove Urban Village, a mixed use development containing residential, commercial and educational facilities and associated infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Brisbane City Plan, Appendix 2
    Introduction ............................................................3 Planting Species Planning Scheme Policy .............167 Acid Sulfate Soil Planning Scheme Policy ................5 Small Lot Housing Consultation Planning Scheme Policy ................................................... 168a Air Quality Planning Scheme Policy ........................9 Telecommunication Towers Planning Scheme Airports Planning Scheme Policy ...........................23 Policy ..................................................................169 Assessment of Brothels Planning Scheme Transport, Access, Parking and Servicing Policy .................................................................. 24a Planning Scheme Policy ......................................173 Brisbane River Corridor Planning Scheme Transport and Traffic Facilities Planning Policy .................................................................. 24c Scheme Policy .....................................................225 Centre Concept Plans Planning Scheme Policy ......25 Zillmere Centre Master Plan Planning Scheme Policy .....................................................241 Commercial Character Building Register Planning Scheme Policy ........................................29 Commercial Impact Assessment Planning Scheme Policy .......................................................51 Community Impact Assessment Planning Scheme Policy .......................................................55 Compensatory Earthworks Planning Scheme Policy .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Our Expertise Roads and Highways Capability Statement Our Commitment to Zero Harm
    OUR EXPERTISE ROADS AND HIGHWAYS CAPABILITY STATEMENT OUR COMMITMENT TO ZERO HARM AT BMD, THE SAFETY OF OUR PEOPLE, THE COMMUNITIES AND ENVIRONMENTS IN WHICH WE WORK HAVE BEEN A PRIORITY SINCE OUR INCEPTION IN 1979. Through our Zero Harm goal, BMD aims to ensure each and every person who comes into contact with our business remains safe and in good health whilst in our care. Jointly we are committed to minimising environmental harm through the implementation of best practice environmental management. Our Zero Harm goal encourages us to constantly strive to improve our workplace health and safety standards. It allows us to remain vigilant and accept our individual responsibility for our actions, and the implementation and continual improvement of our safety and environmental systems and methodologies. Darwin Cairns Townsville The BMD Group has more Mackay than 1700 employees working Emerald throughout Australia and is supported by third party Toowoomba Brisbane Gold Coast certified management systems, substantial balance sheet Perth strength and the resources and Adelaide Sydney Canberra flexibility of a large Australian Melbourne Geelong Seaford owned private company. ROADS AND HIGHWAYS ROADS OUR EXPERTISE SPECIALIST EXPERTISE IN ROAD AND HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION NATIONAL PROJECT 1979 DELIVERY COMPANY ESTABLISHMENT EXPERIENCE IN LOCAL INVESTMENT IN PEOPLE, METROPOLITAN BUSINESSES AND THE COMMUNITY AND REGIONAL ROADWORKS, HEALTH, SAFETY, ENVIRONMENT, COMPLEX HIGHWAYS, STRONG QUALITY AND COMMERCIAL SYSTEMS MOTORWAY INTERCHANGES BMD DELIVERS
    [Show full text]