DOCSLIB.ORG

Heritage Management Protocol Qut Creative Industries Precinct Kelvin Grove Urban Village

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Heritage Management Protocol Qut Creative Industries Precinct Kelvin Grove Urban Village HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PROTOCOL QUT CREATIVE INDUSTRIES PRECINCT KELVIN GROVE URBAN VILLAGE QUT CREATIVE INDUSTRIES PRECINCT A Heritage Management Protocol ■ © COPYRIGHT Allom Lovell Pty Ltd, October 2004 G:\Projects\04015 CreativeInd QUT\Reports\r01.doc QUT CREATIVE INDUSTRIES PRECINCT, KELVIN GROVE URBAN VILLAGE CONTENTS ■ i 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 BACKGROUND 1 1.2 THIS STUDY 2 1.3 WHO SHOULD USE THIS DOCUMENT 3 1.4 THE STRUCTURE OF THE PROTOCOL & HOW TO USE IT 4 2 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK 6 2.1 BRISBANE CITYPLAN 2000 6 2.2 QUEENSLAND HERITAGE ACT 6 DEFINITIONS 7 PENALTIES 8 PERIODIC INSPECTIONS 9 2.3 EMERGENCIES 9 2.4 WORK METHOD STATEMENTS 10 3 AN APPROACH TO CONSERVATION 11 3.1 PHILOSOPHY 11 CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE GUIDING DECISIONS 11 CONTINUING THE THEME 11 3.2 PROCESS 12 FOLLOWING A LOGICAL PROCESS 12 KEEPING RECORDS 12 REVERSIBILITY 12 QUT CREATIVE INDUSTRIES PRECINCT, KELVIN GROVE URBAN VILLAGE CONTENTS ■ ii 4 BUILDING Z1 (FORMERLY BUILDINGS A & B) 13 4.1 APPROVALS 13 EMERGENCIES 13 WORK TO SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT 14 TABLE OF APPROVALS 14 5 BUILDING Z2 (FORMERLY BUILDING C) 15 5.1 APPROVALS 15 EMERGENCIES 15 WORK TO SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT 16 TABLE OF APPROVALS 16 6 BUILDING Z3 (FORMERLY D/C39) 17 6.1 SIGNIFICANCE 18 6.2 THE EXTERIOR 18 SIGNIFICANT FABRIC 18 NON-SIGNIFICANT FABRIC 19 6.3 THE INTERIOR 19 SIGNIFICANT FABRIC 19 NON-SIGNIFICANT FABRIC 20 6.4 APPROVALS 20 EMERGENCIES 20 WORK TO SERVICES & EQUIPMENT 20 TABLE OF APPROVALS 20 7 BUILDING Z4 (FORMERLY BUILDING E1/C39) 25 7.1 SIGNIFICANCE 26 7.2 THE EXTERIOR 26 QUT CREATIVE INDUSTRIES PRECINCT, KELVIN GROVE URBAN VILLAGE CONTENTS ■ iii SIGNIFICANT FABRIC 26 NON-SIGNIFICANT FABRIC 27 7.3 THE INTERIOR 27 SIGNIFICANT FABRIC 27 NON-SIGNIFICANT FABRIC 28 7.4 APPROVALS 28 EMERGENCIES 28 WORK TO SERVICES & EQUIPMENT 28 TABLE OF APPROVALS 28 8 BUILDING Z5 (FORMERLY E2/C33) 33 8.1 SIGNIFICANCE 34 8.2 THE EXTERIOR 34 SIGNIFICANT FABRIC 34 NON-SIGNIFICANT FABRIC 34 NON-SIGNIFICANT FABRIC 35 8.3 THE INTERIOR 35 SIGNIFICANT FABRIC 35 8.4 NON-SIGNIFICANT FABRIC 36 8.5 APPROVALS 36 EMERGENCIES 36 WORK TO SERVICES & EQUIPMENT 36 TABLE OF APPROVALS 36 9 BUILDING Z6 (FORMERLY BUILDING F) 41 9.1 APPROVALS 41 EMERGENCIES 41 WORK TO SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT 42 TABLE OF APPROVALS 42 QUT CREATIVE INDUSTRIES PRECINCT, KELVIN GROVE URBAN VILLAGE CONTENTS ■ iv 10 BUILDING Z7 (FORMERLY BUILDING C34) 43 10.1 SIGNIFICANCE 43 SIGNIFICANT FABRIC 44 NON-SIGNIFICANT FABRIC 44 10.2 APPROVALS 44 EMERGENCIES 44 WORK TO SERVICES & EQUIPMENT 44 TABLE OF APPROVALS 44 11 BUILDING Z9 (PREVIOUSLY C56) 46 11.1 SIGNIFICANCE 46 11.2 APPROVALS 46 EMERGENCIES 46 WORK TO SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT 47 TABLE OF APPROVALS 47 12 PARER PLACE (LOT 903) 48 12.1 SIGNIFICANCE 49 12.2 APPROVALS 49 EMERGENCIES 49 WORK TO SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT 49 TABLE OF APPROVALS 49 13 GONA PARADE 51 13.1 SIGNIFICANCE 52 13.2 APPROVALS 52 EMERGENCIES 52 QUT CREATIVE INDUSTRIES PRECINCT, KELVIN GROVE URBAN VILLAGE CONTENTS ■ v WORK TO SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT 52 TABLE OF APPROVALS 52 14 SPACES BETWEEN THE BUILDINGS (LOT 1) 54 14.1 SIGNIFICANCE 57 14.2 APPROVALS 57 EMERGENCIES 57 WORK TO SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT 57 TABLE OF APPROVALS 58 QUT CREATIVE INDUSTRIES PRECINCT, KELVIN GROVE URBAN VILLAGE 1 INTRODUCTION ■ 1 1 INTRODUCTION his Heritage Management Protocol has been prepared to assist the TQueensland University of Technology and the Queensland Heritage Council to manage changes to part of the heritage listed Gona Barracks. It concerns that part of the listed site known as the Creative Industries Precinct - Lot 1 of the Kelvin Grove Urban Village, part of Gona Parade, and Parer Place (Lot 903). This document acknowledges and identifies the cultural significance of the place and its parts, and aims to protect that significance. It should be read in conjunction with the updated Conservation Plan for the whole listed site prepared in 2004 which recognises the changes made to the site as part of the Kelvin Grove Urban Village infrastructure development and the recent adaptation and new construction by QUT to form the Creative industries Precinct. Philosophy for further adaptation and changes is discussed and categories or levels of approvals for various works are established for each building and the open spaces. 1 Plan of the Subject Site, part of the Kelvin Grove Urban Village. The heavy broken line denotes the Heritage Register boundary for Gona Barracks, the shaded area denotes the part of the site which is the subject of the Protocol – The Creative Industries Precinct [Allom Lovell] 1.1 B ACKGROUND In June 2000, the Queensland Government purchased the former Gona Barracks site from the Department of Defence. The Queensland Department of Housing, in association with the Queensland University of Technology, have developed the barracks and other land to form the Kelvin Grove Urban Village. It will house public and private housing, QUT CREATIVE INDUSTRIES PRECINCT, KELVIN GROVE URBAN VILLAGE 1 INTRODUCTION ■ 2 commercial, retail and mixed use development as well as various QUT facilities such as a physical activity and health centre and an Institute for Health and Biomedical Innovation. The first part of the village to be developed and occupied was the Creative Industries Precinct, the subject of this document. Specifically, this protocol relates to Lot 1 on SP151277 – the area occupied by the Creative Industries buildings – as well as Lot 903, now named Parer Place, and a section of Gona Parade. Other parts of the listed site may be the subject of separate future heritage management protocols. Development of the Creative Industries Precinct, which entailed the adaptation of the two early buildings, the removal of one building and the construction of three new buildings, was approved by the Queensland Heritage Council in May 2002. Infrastructure works, including the removal of several buildings within the precinct area and the construction of landscaping and roads, were approved and constructed earlier. Approval was received for revisions to the approved development in September 2003. These revisions were for changes to landscaping and the provision of shade structures and projection facilities to the former parade ground area. The work was completed in time for the commencement of the academic year early in 2004. Separate approval was received for the adaptation of building A26 on Lot 2 for use by Creative Industries in June 2003. That building is not included within the scope of this protocol. 1.2 T HIS S TUDY The aim of this study is to enable QUT, including its lessees and tenants, to use and manage the Creative Industries Precinct on a daily basis without the need to constantly seek heritage approvals for minor changes. These most often relate to matters of fit-out and maintenance. On a broader scale, the study considers further development of the site and structures, and seeks to provide certainty as to heritage management requirements. The Protocol aims to reduce the administration burden to QUT, its subsidiaries, its lessees and its tenants, and the Queensland Heritage Council by streamlining the heritage assessment process. The procedures for protecting significant fabric generally follow the findings of the Conservation Plan prepared in 2004. That study updated earlier reports and took into account the changes to the Heritage Register boundary and the resultant reduction in site area, the provision of infrastructure as part of the Kelvin Grove Urban Village which included the removal of several buildings from the site, and the construction of the Creative Industries Precinct for QUT. QUT CREATIVE INDUSTRIES PRECINCT, KELVIN GROVE URBAN VILLAGE 1 INTRODUCTION ■ 3 This Protocol takes these findings into account, identifies significant fabric and non-significant fabric in detail, and sets parameters for changes which will require heritage approval or formal exemption. 1.3 W HO SHOULD USE THIS DOCUMENT Due to the complex nature of tenure over the site and its parts, there are several groups involved in the management and maintenance of the Creative Industries Precinct. It is critical that the matter of cultural significance be considered at the earliest stages of any project or proposal to determine if in fact the proposed changes are appropriate to the buildings and the site. QUT Facilities Management: Trade & Supervisory Staff This document has been designed to be used on a daily basis by QUT staff, including maintenance staff who carry out routine changes to buildings in the precinct. Garden maintenance contractors should also be familiar with relevant protocol requirements. QUT Facilities Management: Capital Works and Operations Staff The document should also be used by the Facilities Management Staff who are involved in the planning and implementation of building projects within the subject site. It should be made available where appropriate to consultant teams engaged for specific projects. Brisbane City Council As the body with responsibility for the section of Gona Parade within the subject site, Brisbane City Council need to use the relevant section of the Protocol when planning or carrying out any work in that area. QUT Creative Industries Faculty, QUT Precincts (part of the Division of International & Development), Creative Industries Precinct Pty Ltd, tenants including La Boite theatre, Education Television, caterers These groups need at least to be aware of the constraints involved in the heritage listing of the site even though they may not originate work to the buildings and surrounds. The Protocol should be used to guide any work relating to sub-tenants’ and exhibitors’ requirements which may be co-ordinated by the tenants. QUT CREATIVE INDUSTRIES PRECINCT, KELVIN GROVE URBAN VILLAGE 1 INTRODUCTION ■ 4 2 Plan of the Creative Industries site with the early buildings shaded. [Allom Lovell] 1.4 T HE STRUCTURE OF THE P ROTOCOL & H OW TO USE IT Following this introductory chapter is a section which deals with the relevant legislative framework, then there is a section on the general philosophy for adapting and changing places of cultural significance.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Local Heritage Register
    Explanatory Notes for Development Assessment Local Heritage Register Amendments to the Queensland Heritage Act 1992, Schedule 8 and 8A of the Integrated Planning Act 1997, the Integrated Planning Regulation 1998, and the Queensland Heritage Regulation 2003 became effective on 31 March 2008. All aspects of development on a Local Heritage Place in a Local Heritage Register under the Queensland Heritage Act 1992, are code assessable (unless City Plan 2000 requires impact assessment). Those code assessable applications are assessed against the Code in Schedule 2 of the Queensland Heritage Regulation 2003 and the Heritage Place Code in City Plan 2000. City Plan 2000 makes some aspects of development impact assessable on the site of a Heritage Place and a Heritage Precinct. Heritage Places and Heritage Precincts are identified in the Heritage Register of the Heritage Register Planning Scheme Policy in City Plan 2000. Those impact assessable applications are assessed under the relevant provisions of the City Plan 2000. All aspects of development on land adjoining a Heritage Place or Heritage Precinct are assessable solely under City Plan 2000. ********** For building work on a Local Heritage Place assessable against the Building Act 1975, the Local Government is a concurrence agency. ********** Amendments to the Local Heritage Register are located at the back of the Register. G:\C_P\Heritage\Legal Issues\Amendments to Heritage legislation\20080512 Draft Explanatory Document.doc LOCAL HERITAGE REGISTER (for Section 113 of the Queensland Heritage
    [Show full text]
  • Mixed Evidence from Two Inner City Areas in Brisbane Simon Huston
    Urban Design and Boosterism of Property Sub-Markets: Mixed Evidence from Two Inner City Areas in Brisbane Simon Huston And Marek Kozlowski School Of Geography, Planning And Architecture University Of Queensland, St Lucia Qld 4072, Australia Abstract In recent years Australia has witnessed a spate of inner city revitalisation projects as part of a general trend in urban renewal. Inner city redevelopments have transformed parts of Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and other Australian cities. In this article we explore the impact of urban design, one of the tools of the redevelopment process, on the property market by considering two major projects in inner Brisbane where the selected sites and adjacent neighbourhoods have evolved from working class into upper-middle and high-income class enclaves. We also investigate relationships between the changing urban environment and property prices of the two studied redevelopment sites and their surrounding areas. The paper provides some mixed evidence that urban design master planned inner city enclaves might boost property prices however evidence is inconclusive because property submarkets in the two locations are segmented by heterogeneity of building stock, accessibility and the effects of urban blight. Inner City Transformation in Australia The past two decades have witnessed a major shift in urban policies towards refurbishing the decaying inner city areas. Although there is no question that inner city redevelopments improve and enhance degraded built environments, there is mounting criticism that such transformations cater to only a select group of the community. Further, they often result in disconnection from the remaining fabric of the city (Fainstein 1994, Marshall 2003, Meyer 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Link Road Tunnel
    Coordinator-General’s report Northern Link Road Tunnel Released: April 2010 Report evaluating the Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to section 35(3) of the State Development and Public Works Organisation Act 1971 Coordinator-General’s report – Northern Link Road Tunnel project Contents Synopsis.........................................................................................................4 1. Introduction.............................................................................................6 2. Project description .................................................................................7 2.1 The proponent ...................................................................................7 2.2 Project description .............................................................................7 2.3 Rationale for the project.....................................................................8 3. The impact assessment process............................................................11 3.1 Significant project declaration and controlled action........................11 3.2 Terms of reference for the EIS ........................................................11 3.3 Public notification of the EIS ............................................................12 3.4 Submissions on the EIS...................................................................12 3.5 Change to the project after the EIS..................................................13 3.6 Review of the further information provided (supplementary report to
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf, 531.5 KB
    Heritage Information Please contact us for more information about this place: [email protected] -OR- phone 07 3403 8888 Combined Services Detailed Interrogation Centre (former) (Witton Barracks) - 650030 Key details Also known as Indooroopilly Barracks Addresses At 9 Lambert Road, Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068 Type of place Defence site Period World War II 1939-1945 Lot plan L13_SP108539 Date of Citation — July 2010 Page 1 Key dates Local Heritage Place Since — 30 November 2012 Date of Citation — July 2010 Construction Walls: Masonry People/associations Department of the Army (Architect) Criterion for listing (A) Historical; (B) Rarity; (D) Representative; (G) Social; (G) Social Requisitioned in 1942, the site became the Australian headquarters of the Allied Translator and Interpreter Service (ATIS). Japanese and German POWs were brought here for interrogation prior to imprisonment in the southern states. The military purchased the site in 1945. In 1951 it became the Northern Command Provost Company’s barracks. It changed its name from Indooroopilly Barracks to Witton Barracks during the 1980s. History The Commonwealth requisitioned the site from the Queensland Government’s Public Trustees Limited on October 1942. The Public Trustee was administering this property as part of the estate of H.B. Hemming who died on 8 March 1942. The property had, previously been put up for auction on 15 July but was withdrawn from sale, with a new land evaluation conducted by Blocksidge & Ferguson in August. The site included two residences ‘Tighnabruaich’ and ‘Witton House’ that overlooked the Brisbane River. ‘Tighnabruaich’ was built in 1892. The earlier (1860s) ‘Witton House’ was moved onto the property from elsewhere in Indooroopilly in 1915.
    [Show full text]
  • Former Gona Barracks Kelvin Grove
    FORMER GONA BARRACKS KELVIN GROVE FORMER GONA BARRACKS A Conservation Plan for the Queensland University of Technology ■ © COPYRIGHT Allom Lovell Pty Ltd, November 2004 G:\Projects\04015 CreativeInd QUT\Reports\r02.doc FORMER GONA BARRACKS CONTENTS ■ i 1 INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 BACKGROUND 4 1.2 HERITAGE LISTINGS 5 1.3 THIS REPORT 6 THE SITE 6 1.4 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 7 2 UNDERSTANDING THE PLACE 8 2.1 A MILITARY BARRACKS 8 THE ENDOWMENT 8 FEDERATION AND DEFENCE 9 THE KELVIN GROVE DEFENCE RESERVE 11 THE INTERWAR PERIOD 13 THE SECOND WORLD WAR 16 REGULARS AND RESERVES 19 DISPOSAL OF THE BARRACKS 21 2.2 THE URBAN VILLAGE 22 DEMOLITION 23 CREATIVE INDUSTRIES 23 2.3 THE EARLY BUILDINGS 24 FORMER INFANTRY DRILL HALL (A25) 24 FORMER SERVICES DRILL HALL (A16) 25 THE FRANK MORAN MEMORIAL HALL (A21) 25 FORMER GARAGE AND WORKSHOP BUILDING (A26) 26 FORMER DINING ROOM (A31) 26 FORMER BRIGADE OFFICE (C39) 26 FORMER ARTILLERY DRILL HALL (C39) 27 FORMER GUN PARK (C33) 28 FORMER TOOWONG DRILL HALL (A3) 28 ANCILLARY BUILDINGS 29 THE PARADE GROUND 29 FORMER GONA BARRACKS CONTENTS ■ ii 2.4 VEGETATION 29 3 UNDERSTANDING CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE 31 3.1 CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE 31 3.2 ANALYSIS 31 MILITARY BARRACKS 31 DRILL HALLS 33 3.3 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE 38 EXTENT OF SIGNIFICANCE 39 3.4 PREVIOUS ASSESSMENTS 40 4 CONSERVATION POLICY 44 4.1 GENERAL PRINCIPLES 44 THE BURRA CHARTER 44 ENDORSEMENT AND REVIEW 45 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS 45 SCOPE OF POLICIES 46 4.2 APPROACH 46 4.3 CONSERVATION OF BUILDING FABRIC 48 4.4 ADAPTATION OF BUILDING FABRIC 48 CREATIVE INDUSTRIES PRECINCT 49 4.5 REMOVAL OF BUILDINGS 49 4.6 NEW USES 50 4.7 NEW CONSTRUCTION 50 FORMER GONA BARRACKS CONTENTS ■ iii THE PARADE GROUND 50 4.8 INTERPRETATION 51 5 APPENDIX 52 5.1 NOTES 52 FORMER GONA BARRACKS 1 INTRODUCTION ■ 4 1 INTRODUCTION he former Gona Barracks is currently being redeveloped as part of T the Kelvin Grove Urban Village, a mixed use development containing residential, commercial and educational facilities and associated infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Brisbane City Plan, Appendix 2
    Introduction ............................................................3 Planting Species Planning Scheme Policy .............167 Acid Sulfate Soil Planning Scheme Policy ................5 Small Lot Housing Consultation Planning Scheme Policy ................................................... 168a Air Quality Planning Scheme Policy ........................9 Telecommunication Towers Planning Scheme Airports Planning Scheme Policy ...........................23 Policy ..................................................................169 Assessment of Brothels Planning Scheme Transport, Access, Parking and Servicing Policy .................................................................. 24a Planning Scheme Policy ......................................173 Brisbane River Corridor Planning Scheme Transport and Traffic Facilities Planning Policy .................................................................. 24c Scheme Policy .....................................................225 Centre Concept Plans Planning Scheme Policy ......25 Zillmere Centre Master Plan Planning Scheme Policy .....................................................241 Commercial Character Building Register Planning Scheme Policy ........................................29 Commercial Impact Assessment Planning Scheme Policy .......................................................51 Community Impact Assessment Planning Scheme Policy .......................................................55 Compensatory Earthworks Planning Scheme Policy .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Impact Assessment
    Middle Head, Mosman Former 10 Terminal Regiment Barracks Buildings & Laundry HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Image: 1961 aerial showing the former Ten Terminal Regiment barracks buildings, laundry and adjacent parade ground. Source: Harbour Trust Prepared for: Sydney Harbour Federation Trust Prepared by: Lucas, Stapleton, Johnson and Partners Pty. Ltd. The Trust Building, Suite 303/ 151 King Street Sydney NSW 2000 Telephone: (02) 9357 4811 Date: 16th November 2020 © Lucas, Stapleton, Johnson and Partners Pty. Ltd. 2020 Executive Summary This Heritage Impact Assessment provides an analysis of a proposal to undertake works at Middle Head, Sydney in association with future public domain improvements. Implementing the future public domain improvements will require the demolition of three (3) weatherboard barracks buildings (Buildings B1, B2 and B3) and one (1) weatherboard laundry (Building B4) that formed part of the 10 Terminal Regiment precinct (previously the 111th Light Anti-aircraft Artillery Battery precinct) located at Middle Head. The former Defence lands at Headland Park, Mosman (which include the Middle Head precinct and the adjoining HMAS Penguin Naval base), are listed together on the Commonwealth Heritage List, under the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth.) as Commonwealth Heritage Place No 105541. The Middle Head precinct is under the care and management of the Sydney Harbour Federation Trust (Harbour Trust), a Commonwealth government agency. The report has been prepared by Lucas, Stapleton, Johnson & Partners (LSJ) on behalf of the Harbour Trust, as the proponent. This Heritage Impact Assessment is being prepared to form part of an application that the Harbour Trust will refer to the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth).
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Cultural Heritage
    The University of Queensland Archaeological Services Unit Report No. 423b Cultural Heritage Report for the Proposed Northern Link Project Report to Sinclair Knight Merz Connell Wagner Joint Venture Jon Prangnell PhD, Karen Murphy BA(Hons), Tam Smith MA and Linda Terry BA(Hons) School of Social Science The University Of Queensland Brisbane Q 4072 September 2008 Executive Summary This report details the results of the cultural heritage investigations undertaken of the Northern Link Project area (henceforth known as the Study Area). The University of Queensland Archaeological Services Unit (UQASU) was contracted by the Sinclair Knight Merz Connell Wagner Joint Venture on behalf of Brisbane City Council to undertake a study of the existing cultural heritage values of the proposed Northern Link route. This report details the results of studies of both the Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal cultural heritage places within the Study Area and the likely impacts and mitigation measures required. It is based on existing knowledge, registers and reports of the Study Area, community consultation, survey reports produced by the relevant Aboriginal Parties and surveys of standing structures conducted between October and December 2007. The Study Area consists of a corridor that traverses the inner western suburbs of Brisbane from Toowong in the west to Kelvin Grove in the east, taking in parts of the suburbs of Auchenflower, Bardon, Bowen Hills, Brisbane City (Petrie Terrace), Fortitude Valley, Herston, Kelvin Grove, Milton, Mount Coot-tha, Paddington, Red Hill, Spring Hill, Taringa and Toowong. For the purposes of the Cultural Heritage Study, a 300m buffer was applied around the Study Area to ensure that all places that may be affected by the proposed development were captured in the study.
    [Show full text]
  • The QUT Creative Industries Experience
    creative industries The QUT Creative Industries Experience Connecting business enterprise, education, research and development, cultural production and exhibition in a creative precinct The QUT Creative Industries Experience Table of Contents 3 Foreword 4 Introduction 6 The Creative Industries 7 John Hartley: Research-led educational renewal and economic-cultural convergence 12 Susan Street: Education renewal and the Creative Industries Faculty 18 Stuart Cunningham: The creative industries idea 20 Creative Enterprise 21 Anna Rooke: Creative Enterprise Australia: a model for growing the creative economy 24 Lindy Johnson: Queensland government leads on creative industries 28 Research 29 Stuart Cunningham: Renovating research and policy on creative industries and innovation 33 Jeff Jones: Effective collaboration for managing research and development (R&D) in Creative Industries 39 Philip Graham: Interdisciplinarity: six planes of engagement 42 Community 43 Stephen Pincus: KGUV: a creative and clever community 47 Christopher Wren: a view from the design perspective 49 The Hornery Institute: Staying in step with the emerging community 53 Lubi Thomas: QUT Precincts: Creating a new model of public engagement 56 Christopher Meakin: QUT’s international programs and linkages 60 Coda 61 Michael Keane: The uncertain journey 66 Appendices 66 Appendix 1: QUT Creative Industries research projects 69 Appendix 2: QUT Creative Enterprise Australia businesses The QUT Creative Industries Experience 3 Foreword Nearly a decade ago, QUT initiated an exciting experiment to lead the development of the creative industries in Australia. We established Australia’s first Creative industries The Creative Industries story continues to grow The essays in this publication document and Faculty and just a few years on, we are proud that in an exciting environment at Kelvin Grove.
    [Show full text]
  • Overcoming the Challenges of Building Heritage Projects: Improvements to Time, Scope and Cost Performance
    OVERCOMING THE CHALLENGES OF BUILDING HERITAGE PROJECTS: IMPROVEMENTS TO TIME, SCOPE AND COST PERFORMANCE Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Miljenka Perovic Bachelor Engineer in Architecture and Urbanism School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment Science and Engineering Faculty Queensland University of Technology 2015 Keywords Heritage places, heritage retention, social value of the place, management of design and scope definition, project performance, project delivery, project success, overrun causes, over budget causes, challenges of the multiple stakeholder involvement OVERCOMING THE CHALLENGES OF BUILDING HERITAGE PROJECTS: IMPROVEMENTS TO TIME, SCOPE AND COST PERFORMANCE i OVERCOMING THE CHALLENGES OF BUILDING HERITAGE PROJECTS: IMPROVEMENTS TO TIME, SCOPE AND COST PERFORMANCE ii Abstract The movement to protect the heritage of national buildings has grown enormously in many countries since the World Heritage Centre and the World Heritage list within UNECSO were both established in 1972. Many heritage organisations have since been founded with the aim to protect and manage cultural heritage, and numerous studies have supported the importance of preserving and protecting built heritage. Today, the idea of heritage building protection incorporates the protection of many cultural attributes globally. Managing heritage-listed building projects has been seen as a sensitive issue, sometimes facing criticism due to such projects often running over time and, as a result of such delays, over budget. Various research studies have been conducted to identify solutions to improve the management of the restoration and refurbishment of heritage projects. Despite the development of principles, policies and guidance, many problems still exist that affect the management of heritage projects.
    [Show full text]
  • E:\Sage Old Books\Publishing\Glen Oliver\Final Copy\Master10h.Wpd
    ORDNANCE CITIZEN FORCES QUEENSLAND A HISTORY OF UNITS AND PERSONNEL 1925 - 1998 Researched and recorded by WO1 G.J. Sheehan OAM BRISBANE PUBLISHED BY RAAOC ARES VINTAGE CLUB COMMITTEE - 2001 in association with Sage Old Books, PO Box 51 Pomona, Qld, 4568 First published 2001 by the RAAOC ARES Vintage Club Committee, in association with Sage Old Books, PO Box 51 Pomona, Qld, 4568 This book is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without prior written permission. Sales and other enquiries should be directed to the committee’s representative, G.J. Sheehan, 13 Kormilda Place, Boondall, Queensland, 4034 The RAAOC ARES Vintage Club Committee has attempted to obtain permission to reproduce all material reproduced herein. Should your material have been inadvertently reproduced without permission, please inform the committee’s representative detailed above. ©RAAOC ARES Vintage Club Committee, 2001 National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-publication data: Sheehan, G. J. (Graham J.), 1935- . Ordnance citizen forces, Queensland : a history of units and personnel, 1925-1998. Includes index. ISBN 0 9587021 1 X. 1. Australia. Army. Australian Army Ordnance Corps - History - 20th century. 2. Australia. Army. Royal Australian Army Ordnance Corps - History - 20th century. 3. Australia. Army - Reserves. 4. Queensland - History, Military - 20th century. I. RAAOC ARES Vintage Club. Committee. II. Title. 355.62109943 Editing, Layout and Index by Sage Old Books, Pomona, Queensland.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CLIFTON GUNS and the FATAL ACCIDENT at the SALUTING BATTERY in 1879
    127 QUEENSLAND'S FIRST ARTILLERY — THE CLIFTON GUNS and THE FATAL ACCIDENT AT THE SALUTING BATTERY IN 1879 by Dr. Drury Clarke, F.R.HistS.Q. Delivered at a Meeting of the Society on 22 July 1982 The outbreak of the Crimean War in 1854 had provided the stimulus for the formation of Volunteer units in the Colony of New South Wales to supplement the British garrison troops stationed there but by the time of Separation in 1859 this Volunteer activity had con­ siderably diminished. It needed the threat of a war between France and Britain at the end of the decade to bring about its revival. For some time prior to the Crimean War it had been the policy of the British Government to exert pressure on the self-governing Colonies to undertake a greater share in home defence, leaving extra territorial defence and foreign policy to the mother country.' In his Letter of Appointment as Captain-General and Governor- in-Chief in and over the Colony of Queensland, Sir George Ferguson Bowen was instructed by the Secretary of State for Colonies, Edward Bulwer Lytton, to raise a Volunteer Force there without delay.^ The urgency for this was now increased by the presence of a potential enemy Naval base in Noumea, less than 1200 kilometres, and less than a week's sailing, from Brisbane. This in brief was the situation as Separation approached. .Dr. Drury Clarke is Senior Vice-President of the Royal Historical Society of Queensland. 128 Arrival of Governor Bowen Her Majesty's Sloop Cordelia carrying the Governor Designate of the newly created Colony of Queensland entered Moreton Bay on the evening of 9 December 1859.
    [Show full text]