DOCSLIB.ORG

Landscape Capacity Study 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Landscape Capacity Study 2016 Hart Landscape Capacity Study Appendix 2 Hart District Council (2016) Appendix 2 Hart District Council Landscape Capacity Study Local Area Record Sheets 157 Area Record Sheet - Hart District Council Landscape Capacity Study 2016 Area: BRAMSHILL Local character area: BH-01 – land at Bramshill, Heath Warren & Warren Heath Date of site survey: 27th January 2015 Weather / visibility: partly cloudy / clear Local Plan (saved) policies: GEN 3 – Landscape Character Areas; GEN 10 – Renewables; CON 1 – European Designations; CON 2 - National Designations; CON 3 – Local Designations; CON 4 – Replacement & Habitats; CON 5 - Species Protected by Law; CON 6 – Heathlands; CON 7 – Riverine Environments; CON 8 - Trees, Woodlands & Hedgerows: Amenity Value; CON 10 – Basingstoke Canal; CON 11 – Archaeological Sites & Scheduled Monuments; CON 12 – Historic Parks & Gardens; CON 13 & 14 – Conservation Areas (general policies and demolition of buildings); CON 17 & 18 – Listed Buildings and Buildings of Local Interest; CON 19 - Strategic Gaps; CON 20 – Strategic Gaps: Blackwater Valley; CON 21 – Local Gaps; RUR 2; RUR 3; RUR 4; RUR 5; RUR 8; RUR 10; RUR 11; RUR 12; RUR 13; RUR 24; RUR 30; RUR 31; RUR 32; RUR 33; RUR 34; RUR 38 Hart District Council Landscape Character Area: Bramshill (7) HCC Integrated Landscape Character Assessment Area: 1B North east Plantations & Heath Local Area Characteristics: Narrow plateau running north west to south east with shallow valley sides in the south west to River Hart & north east to River Blackwater Bramshill Park House (former Police training college) listed Grade I plus complex of 9 other listed buildings and structures, 5 of which are Grade 1, with the other 5 being Grade II Bramshill Park is a listed Grade II* park and garden as well as an area with Significant Archaeological Features This area has a high percentage cover of coniferous plantation on former heathland (Warren Heath & Heath Warren Wood) Bramshill Plantation, adjacent to the north of this area, Warren Heath, Heath Warren Wood and Hazeley Heath to the SW of this area are designated as the TBH SPA, and are also designated as a SSSI, with wooded copses designated as SINCs throughout this area This area has a good coverage of PRoW through the SW and NE but are generally absent through the centre Mosaic of small scale grazing fields, often for equestrian use, along the east and west sides of the River Hart valley Landscape designation/s: TBH SPA (approx 40-50% of this area); Bramshill SSSI (approx 40% of this area); 8 x SINC; HBIC Sites of Bio Importance; 8 x BAP Priority Sites; Grade II* Listed Park & Garden; setting of Grade I listed building + many other Grade II and II* listed structures; Flood Zones 2 & 3 – River Hart in SW; Risk of Surface Water Flooding – multiple ribbons throughout, often small (LV =H) 158 VISUAL SENSITIVITY General visibility Population Mitigation potential Views into the site from: Types of receptors (viewers): Opportunity for mitigation and landscape Boundary roads and lanes PRoW users compatibility mitigation: horse riders Limited due to high extent of woodland cover and local road network flood zones in river valley floor Views out of the site to: Magnitude of viewers (level of use and popularity): Impacts of mitigation: Limited due to valley landform to SW and high High usage of central bridleway due to high local Increase in tree cover likely to reduce the farming proportion of woodland cover population of private horse ownership. characteristics which have historic field pattern. Medium to high usage of FP given the amount of Increase in tree cover may also conflict with aims surface wear/erosion of the TBH SPA and Bramshill SSSI Does the site form part of the skyline: Visual perception (activity and expectations of the Yes – tree-scapes local receptors): Horse riding; walking + dogs; mountain biking; nature enthusiasts Expectations are high due to long standing former use of Bramshill Park as a Police Training College Panoramic views: Yes Landmark features: Historic formal avenues and park land; extensive areas of plantation woodland; extensive areas of surface mineral extraction; extensive areas of landscape restoration following mineral extraction Sensitivity score: Sensitivity score: Sensitivity score: H H H Visual sensitivity score: HIGH Additional comments: 159 LANDSCAPE SENSITIVITY Natural factors Cultural factors Perceptual features Topography and landform: Boundary features other than vegetation: Tranquillity – noise intrusion: Narrow plateau/ridge running NW to SE; shallow Local roads and lanes Near centre noise intrusion is almost nil; in dry valley to NE; shallow river valley to SW proximity Geological features: Historic landscapes: Tranquillity – visual intrusion: SW portion has River valley; gravel plateau Bramshill Park listed grade II* Park & Garden low visual intrusion whereas certain areas in north and east visual intrusion is high Soil quality: Parkland features: Tranquillity – light pollution / dark skies: Fertile but narrow river valley floor; the Formal avenues; parkland trees; lakes/ponds Glow from Basingstoke and Reading but remainder of the area has very low to low fertility (closer to main house) otherwise no street lighting in this area Land cover and land use: Conservation Area: Setting of CA/s: Former police training college at Bramshill Park; Eversley Church Farm abuts in the NE Plantation on heath and farming mix of arable and Heath Warren Wood & Warren Heath actively Bramshill abuts in the NW grazing managed for timber crop; much smaller proportion of this area along the River Whitewater valley has farming/grazing use Tree belts, tree groups and individual trees: Landscape features of CA: Scenic quality: Individual and groups of parkland trees associated Mix of farming use Medium as plantation/commercial woodland less with historic parkland; some tree belts within field scenic than a more natural, deciduous woodland; pattern to SW + Southern Electricity Depot in north of area brings industrial characteristics Whitewater valley area however has high scenic qualities Hedgerows and hedgerow trees: Built form: Accessibility via PRoW: Confined to the environs of the river valley Complex of historic structures at Bramshill Park Good although limited to locations near the along with 20th century campus buildings for boundary of this area former police training Woodlands and copses: Setting of Listed Buildings: Open access areas: 160 Many small copse along River Hart valley; Yes – with ‘setting’ widely distributed A large proportion of Heath Warren Wood and Heath Warren Wood and Warren Heath Warren Heath is open access plantation and woodland occupy the majority of this area Wetland and meadow: Scheduled Ancient Monuments: Recreational areas: Along river valley floor Mound at Cudbury Clump No Common Land: Settlement pattern: Adjacent west at Hazeley Lea; Former country house and other structures built Hazeley; by Baron Edward la Zouche early 17th century; and Hazeley Heath converted in 1960s to police training college – otherwise occasional small cottage near perimeter of this area Heathland: Contribution of private gardens to landscape Aesthetic sensitivity – openness / enclosure: Yes – coniferous plantation on former heath as character: Main forestry routes/bridleway very broad with well as heathland no long linear views/but enclosed on the sides; otherwise enclosed Other vegetation cover of significance: Cultural associations: Aesthetic sensitivity – landscape pattern: No High significance historic country house, park and Historic, irregular field pattern along and to the garden/former police training centre; nature sides of the River Hart valley; large expanse of conservation; horse riding; open access areas plantation forestry areas on former heathland Wildlife designations (SPA / SSSI / SINC / SNAW): Features of cultural importance: Remoteness: TBH SPA; Bramshill SSSI; 8 x SINC; HBIC Sites of Various listed buildings; central bridleway/ride Significant feeling of remoteness within areas of Bio Importance across whole area; BAP Priority the plantation. SW area considerably more active, Sites across whole area feeling far less remote Landscape Quality/Condition: SW half relatively intact (areas under farming) although occasional adjacent heathland restoration work give a sense of a landscape in transition; Other information: Sensitivity score (natural factors): Sensitivity score (cultural factors): Sensitivity score (perceptual features): M/H H H 161 Landscape sensitivity score: HIGH Additional comments: The eastern portion of this area, as well as a pocket in the north, demonstrates a ‘landscape at work’. This is due to the uncompromising nature of open- cast minerals extraction which literally wipes the surface landscape away. Once the minerals have been exhausted the land will be restored although the specifics of that would need to be explored via the HCC minerals planning consent. In the north a former minerals extraction area has been used for non- inert waste (so toxic and emitting methane) and has been ‘restored’ for some time. However, the sides of the landfill are engineered slopes so lack a natural appearance and the whole area is fenced off as it these types of facilities are hazardous. To the east of the landfill site is a gas pressure monitoring depot which is industrial in character. Despite these negative features almost the entire area falls under one nature conservation designation or another, with the significant majority being within the TBH SPA and the 400m
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Habitat Regulations Assessment: Elstead and Weyburn Neighbourhood Development Plan
    Habitat Regulations Assessment: Elstead and Weyburn Neighbourhood Development Plan Elstead Parish Council March 2021 Habitat Regulations Assessment: Elstead and Elstead Parish Council Weyburn Neighbourhood Development Plan Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Hannah Corrigan James Riley Max Wade James Riley Graduate Ecologist Technical Director Technical Director Technical Director Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position 0 January 2021 Draft JR James Riley Technical Director 1 March 2021 Final following JR James Riley Technical Director group review Distribution List # Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name Prepared for: Elstead Parish Council AECOM Habitat Regulations Assessment: Elstead and Elstead Parish Council Weyburn Neighbourhood Development Plan Prepared for: Elstead Parish Council Prepared by: AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited Midpoint, Alencon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP United Kingdom T: +44(0)1256 310200 aecom.com © 2020 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party
    [Show full text]
  • Bramshill Site of Special Scientific Interest
    The Dragonflies of Bramshill Site of Special Scientific Interest Freshwater Habitats Trust Author Ken Crick Forward Bramshill Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) is a Flagship Pond Site. Part of a network of the very best of Britain’s ponds; sites of exceptional importance for freshwater wildlife and some of our finest freshwater habitats. The Flagship sites can be a single special pond, or more commonly group of ponds, selected because they support rich, often irreplaceable, communities and species at risk of extinction. They represent some of the least impacted, most diverse pond habitats remaining in the country. Many of our nation’s most beautiful and biodiverse waterbodies have degraded irrevocably, and it’s critically important that the remaining sites are well protected and well managed. In 2015, with funding from the Heritage Lottery Fund, Freshwater Habitats Trust launched the Flagship Ponds project, Mats of Water Crowfoot flower on Bramshill working with land managers and community groups to ensure that the most Plantation’s Longwater. critical pond sites in Britain were protected for the long term. This book has been published with the aim of enabling people visiting this, Introduction immensely important Flagship Pond Site in Northern Hampshire, to identify the dragonflies and damselflies they encounter - by reference to a simple text This nationally important Site of managed by Forestry Commission and in places subsequent backfilling Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) England (FCE), please see the site with landfill, Bramshill SSSI has and photographs. It should also inform those visiting the site of the location is notified as such in part for its map on page 6 which depicts the through a combination of careful of the majority of freshwater habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Display PDF in Separate
    BLACKWATER RIVER DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN April 1992 NRA National Rivers Authority Thames Region BLACKWATER RIVER CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION DRAFT April 1992 FOREWARD The National Rivers Authority was created in 1989 to conserve and enhance the natural water environment. In our role as 'Guardians of the Water Environment' we are committed to preparing a sound and thorough plan for the future management of the region's river catchments. This Draft Catchment Management Plan is a step towards achieving that goal for the Blackwater River catchment. As a vehicle for consultation it will provide a means of seeking a consensus on the way ahead and as a planning document it will be a means of seeking commitment from all parties to realising the environmental potential of the catchment. » '' I ■ ; We look forward to receiving the contributions of those organisations and individuals involved with the river and its catchment. Les Jones Regional General Manager Kings Meadow House Kings Meadow Road Reading Berks RGl 800 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY II Tel: Reading (0734) 535000 II Telex: 849614 NRATHA G Fax: (0734) 500388 121268 Blackwater Rivet DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN A p r i l 1 9 9 2 National Rivers Authority Thames Region King's Meadow House King's Meadow Road Reading BLACKWATER RIVER DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONTENTS LIST Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The National Rivers Authority 1.1 1.2 Catchment Management Planning 1.2 2.0 CATCHMENT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Introduction 2.1 2.2 General Features 2.2 2.3 Topography 2.4 2.4
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Appraisal Report
    Bracknell Forest Borough Council Final Sustainability Appraisal Report Technical Document D Site Specific Appraisal: Full appraisal tables October 2006 Site specific sustainability appraisal The tables in the following document provide the full sustainability appraisal for each site proposed within the Site Allocations DPD and the policies within the document. Full details of how this appraisal was carried out, how the scores were calculated, and a summary of the results, can be found in Section 3 of the Final Sustainability Appraisal Report (November 2006). Scoring of Options Score + + The site or policy will have a very positive impact on the sustainability objective + The site or policy will have a slightly positive impact on the sustainability objective The site or policy will have a negligible or neutral impact on the sustainable objective. A recorded 0 neutral effect does not necessarily mean there will be no effect at the project level, but shows that at this strategic level there are no identifiable effects. - The site or policy will have a slightly negative impact on the sustainability objective - - The site or policy will have a very negative impact on the sustainability objective The outcome of implementing the site or policy could be dependant upon implementation or more i detail is required to make an assessment ? The impact of an issue cannot be predicted at this stage Sustainability Objectives Ref. number SA Objective Meet local housing needs by ensuring that everyone has the opportunity to live in a decent, 1 sustainably constructed house. 2 Reduce the risk of flooding and harm to people, property and the environment 3 Protect and enhance human wealth and wellbeing 4 Reduce poverty and social exclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Hart District Association of Parish & Town Councils
    HART DISTRICT ASSOCIATION OF PARISH & TOWN COUNCILS MINUTES OF THE MEETING Held on Tuesday 10th April 2018 At The Key Centre, Elvetham Heath PRESENT Alastair Clark Chairman Dogmersfield PC John Keane Vice Chairman Yateley TC Gill Chatfield Church Crookham PC David Argent Crondall PC Simon Ambler Crookham Village PC Geoff Beaven Dogmersfield PC Jan Hyatt Elvetham Heath PC Marilyn Robson Elvetham Heath PC Bob Schofield Fleet TC Daryl Phillips Hart DC David Bell Heckfield PC John Orchard Hook PC Bob Aylmer Mattingley PC Steve Burridge Rotherwick PC Harriet Kennett South Warnborough PC Meyrick Williams Winchfield PC Tony Spencer Yateley TC GUEST SPEAKER Chris Cornwell Transport in Hart 18/416 Welcome and Introductions Marilyn Robson welcomed all to the Key Centre, Elvetham Heath. 18/417 Apologies Apologies for absence were received from: Adrian Collett (Blackwater and Hawley TC) Chris Dorn (Crondall PC), Dan Bunter (Crookham Village PC), Liz Ford (Greywell PC, Long Sutton and Well PC), Dr Jane Worlock (Hook PC) and Andrew Renshaw (Winchfield PC). 18/418 Minutes of the Meeting held on 9th January 2018 The acceptance of the minutes was proposed by Tony Spencer and seconded by Geoff Beaven and all being in agreement; they were duly signed as an accurate record of the meeting. 18/419 Matters arising from Minutes of the Last Meeting There were no matters arising from the minutes of the last meeting. HDAPTC Minutes 2018-04-10 v04 Issued 350 18/420 Hart District Council Report - Daryl Phillips The Council have closed the accounts for the fiscal year that has just ended. Business continues but they are now operating under purdah due to the imminent local elections, with the expectation that business as usual will start again in June.
    [Show full text]
  • Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Sincs Hampshire.Pdf
    Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) within Hampshire © Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre No part of this documentHBIC may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recoding or otherwise without the prior permission of the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Central Grid SINC Ref District SINC Name Ref. SINC Criteria Area (ha) BD0001 Basingstoke & Deane Straits Copse, St. Mary Bourne SU38905040 1A 2.14 BD0002 Basingstoke & Deane Lee's Wood SU39005080 1A 1.99 BD0003 Basingstoke & Deane Great Wallop Hill Copse SU39005200 1A/1B 21.07 BD0004 Basingstoke & Deane Hackwood Copse SU39504950 1A 11.74 BD0005 Basingstoke & Deane Stokehill Farm Down SU39605130 2A 4.02 BD0006 Basingstoke & Deane Juniper Rough SU39605289 2D 1.16 BD0007 Basingstoke & Deane Leafy Grove Copse SU39685080 1A 1.83 BD0008 Basingstoke & Deane Trinley Wood SU39804900 1A 6.58 BD0009 Basingstoke & Deane East Woodhay Down SU39806040 2A 29.57 BD0010 Basingstoke & Deane Ten Acre Brow (East) SU39965580 1A 0.55 BD0011 Basingstoke & Deane Berries Copse SU40106240 1A 2.93 BD0012 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood North SU40305590 1A 3.63 BD0013 Basingstoke & Deane The Oaks Grassland SU40405920 2A 1.12 BD0014 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood South SU40505520 1B 1.87 BD0015 Basingstoke & Deane West Of Codley Copse SU40505680 2D/6A 0.68 BD0016 Basingstoke & Deane Hitchen Copse SU40505850 1A 13.91 BD0017 Basingstoke & Deane Pilot Hill: Field To The South-East SU40505900 2A/6A 4.62
    [Show full text]
  • A Settlement Hierarchy for Hart District
    Local Development Framework Background Paper A Settlement Hierarchy for Hart District January 2010 (updated August 2010) - 2 - Contents 1 Introduction …………………………………………………………... 2 2 The Local Plan Approach ……………………………………………... 3 3 Core Strategy Preferred Options (2006) approach ………………….. 6 4 Policy Context ………………………………... ……………………… 8 5 Profile of Rural Hampshire …………………………………………… 10 6 Analysis of settlements ………………………………………………... 12 7 Formulating a new settlement hierarchy……………………………… 12 Appendices Appendix 1: Breakdown of settlements by population, facilities and services……................. 18 Appendix 2: Map of road and rail network in Hart District ………………………………. 21 Figures Figure 1: Map of the Settlement Boundaries in the Adopted Local Plan (1996-2006) .……. 5 Figure 2: Map of Hampshire County Council Rural and Urban Classification…….................. 11 Figure 3: Map of the Proposed Settlement Hierarchy …………………………….................. 16 - 1 - 1. Introduction 1.1 Following the revocation of the Regional Spatial Strategies by the new Conservative – Liberal Democrat Coalition Government in June 2010 it is considered necessary to update the original Settlement Hierarchy Background Paper (January 2010) in light of the changes. 1.2 Hart District contains a number of towns and villages that vary in size. It is useful for plan-making purposes to group these settlements into a hierarchy based on an understanding of their current size and level of service provision. 1.3 It is important to note that the hierarchy does not in itself amount to a spatial strategy and does not dictate the levels of growth that will go to different settlements. It is a hierarchy based on the settlements as they are now, rather than as they might look in the future. It is merely a framework around which one or more options for a spatial strategy can be articulated.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Capacity Study 2016
    Hart Landscape Capacity Study Main Study and Appendix 1 Hart District Council (2016) Contents Page 1. Executive Summary 1 2. Introduction 8 3. Background to Study 9 4. Objectives 10 5. Approach and Methodology 11 6. Assessment Thresholds 21 7. Study Constraints 25 8. Map of the District: Summary of Results 26 Appendix 1: Local Area Summaries 27 Appendix 2: Local Area Record Sheets 157 Hart District Council Local Plan Landscape Capacity Study 2016 1.0 Executive Summary 1.1 Purpose of the Study This report has been produced to inform the evidence base for the Hart District Council Local Plan. It assesses the relative capacity of the landscape to accommodate development in the rural areas of the District, outside of the established settlement boundaries. The capacity of each area has been awarded by testing the results of each assessment against the following criteria: Low capacity – the landscape area could not accommodate areas of new development without a significant and adverse impact on the landscape character. Occasional, very small scale development may be possible, providing it has regard to the setting and form of existing settlement and the character and the sensitivity of the adjacent character areas. Low/medium capacity – a minimal amount of development could be accommodated only in limited situations, providing it has regard to the setting and form of existing settlement and the character and the sensitivity of the adjacent character areas. Medium capacity – the landscape area could be able to accommodate areas of development in some parts, providing it has regard to the setting and form of existing settlement and the character and the sensitivity of the adjacent character areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Sequential Test 5880
    Sequential Test 5880 The Bell Public House 36 Frogmore Road Blackwater Camberley GU17 0NP Ambiental Environmental Assessment Sussex Innovation Centre, Science Park Square, Brighton, BN1 9SB Reference: 5880 Final v1.0 Document Issue Record Project: Sequential Test Prepared for: Camberley Bell Ltd Reference: 5878 Site Location: The Bell Public House, 36 Frogmore Road, Blackwater, Camberley GU17 0NP Proposed Development: It is understood that the development is for the demolition of the existing building (vacant public house) and construction of a new dementia care home. Consultant Date Signature Author Oliver Harvey 10/12/2020 Document Check Lydia Sayers 15/12/2020 Authorisation Steven Brown 18/12/2020 Please Note: This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the commissioning party and may not be reproduced without prior written permission from Ambiental Environmental Assessment. All work has been carried out within the terms of the brief using all reasonable skill, care and diligence. No liability is accepted by AMBIENTAL for the accuracy of data or opinions provided by others in the preparation of this report, or for any use of this report other than for the purpose for which it was produced. Contact Us: Ambiental Environmental Assessment Sussex Innovation Centre, Science Park Square, Brighton, BN1 9SB www.ambiental.co.uk UK Office: +44 (0) 203 857 8540 or +44 (0) 203 857 8530 Ambiental Environmental Assessment Sussex Innovation Centre, Science Park Square, Brighton, BN1 9SB i Reference: 5880 Final v1.0 Contents 1. Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Waterman Numbered Report Template
    Workplace Travel Plan Unit B4 - Lambs Farm Business Park, Basingstoke Road, Swallowfield RG7 1PQ 29 June 2018 Waterman Infrastructure & Environment Limited Pickfords Wharf, Clink Street, London SE1 9DG www.watermangroup.com Client Name: JP Winkworth Ltd Document Reference: WIE14810-100-R-1-1-1-WTP Project Number: DM/WIE14810 Quality Assurance – Approval Status This document has been prepared and checked in accordance with Waterman Group’s IMS (BS EN ISO 9001: 2015, BS EN ISO 14001: 2015 and BS OHSAS 18001:2007) Issue Date Prepared by Checked by Approved by 1-1-1 29/06/18 Dave Martin Andrew Trowbridge Andrew Trowbridge Comments Disclaimer This report has been prepared by Waterman Infrastructure & Environment Limited, with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the client, incorporation of our General Terms and Condition of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to us by agreement with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. This report is confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies on the report at its own risk. Content 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 What is a Travel Plan? .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GB Electricity System Operator Daily Report Nationalgrideso UNRESTRICTED GB Electricity System Operator Daily Report Tuesday 11 June 2019
    GB Electricity System Operator Daily Report nationalgridESO UNRESTRICTED GB Electricity System Operator Daily Report Tuesday 11 June 2019 Today’s High Level Risk Status Forecast for the next 24h Time General Status Voltage PSM Demand System Inertia 07:00 - 14:00 System Margins Weather Duty 14:00 - 21:00 Generation Transmission Officer 21:00 - 07:00 Active Constraints Today’s Minimum De-Rated Margin 3891.13 (SP 36) System Warnings None Generation Variable Current BMU Largest Loss Risk Demand 560MW Balancing Costs Last 241 hours'6 ENCC11 BM16 spend212631Total:36 £729k414651566166717681869196 £80k £60k £40k £20k £0k -£20k -£40k Yesterday’s Market Summary Cash out price (Max) £80.00 /MWh (SP 20) Cash Out Price (Min) £23.01 /MWh (SP 15) Peak Demand Yesterday 28,745 MW NETS Status Report; 11 June 2019 2 of 4 nationalgridESO UNRESTRICTED Interconnectors Today Import Export Netherlands (BritNed) 1060 1060 Fully Available France (IFA) 1500 1500 Pole 1 unavailable, due to RTS at 12:00hrs Belgium (Nemo) 1013 1013 Fullly Available Ireland (EWIC) 500 530 Fullly Available Northern Ireland (MOYLE) 395 500 Partially available. Wind Power Forecast Key: Expected embedded generation (MWs) Embedded Generation Forecast 10-JUN-2019 11-JUN-2019 12-JUN-2019 05:00 08:00 12:00 17:00 21:00 00:00 05:00 08:00 12:00 17:00 21:00 00:00 05:00 08:00 12:00 17:00 21:00 Solar (MW) 1 1640 3830 1700 46 0 0 1039 3564 2060 29 0 0 725 2193 1717 38 Wind (MW) 284 381 689 1203 1281 1361 1783 2073 2250 2137 1798 1760 1712 1706 1773 1751 1600 STOR (MW) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total (MW) 285 2021 4519 2903 1327 1361 1783 3112 5814 4197 1827 1760 1712 2431 3966 3468 1638 NETS Status Report; 11 June 2019 3 of 4 nationalgridESO UNRESTRICTED Weather Source Commentary 11/05/2019 Met Office Today: (Summary) SEPA Rain, heavy at times, and strong winds will continue across much of Natural Resources Wales England and Wales, although south and southeastern parts will be brighter with lighter winds but with heavy, thundery showers developing.
    [Show full text]
  • Land South of Eversley Centre Agricultural Land Classiflcation ALC Map and Report October 1996
    Al Hart District Replacement Local Plan Site 1021 - Land South of Eversley Centre Agricultural Land Classiflcation ALC Map and Report October 1996 Resource Planning Team ADAS Reference: 1506/082/96 Guildford Statutory Group MAFF Reference: EL 15/01383 ADAS Reading LUPU Commission: 02393 AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION REPORT HART DISTRICT REPLACEMENT LOCAL PLAN SITE 1021 - LAND SOUTH OF EVERSLEY CENTRE Introduction 1. This report presents the findings of a detailed Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) survey on approximately 14 hectares of land at Hollybush Farm, south of Eversley Centre, Hampshire. The survey was carried out during October 1996. 2. The survey was commissioned by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF) from ils Land Use Planning Unit in Reading, in connection with the Hart District Replacement Local Plan. The results of this survey supersede any previous ALC information for this land. 3. The work was conducted by members oflhe Resource Planning Team in the Guildford Slalutory Group of ADAS. The land has been graded in accordance with the pubHshed MAFF ALC guidelines and criteria (MAFF, 1988). A description ofthe ALC grades and subgrades is given in Appendix I. 4. At the time of survey the majority of land was in permanent pasture except for a small section in the far eastem part of the sile which was in maize slubble. The area shown as 'Other Land' comprised woodland. Summary 5. The findings ofthe survey are shown on the enclosed ALC map. The map has been drawn at a scale of 1:10,000. It is accurate at this scale, but any enlargement would be misleading.
    [Show full text]