Hart, Rushmoor and Surrey Heath Water Cycle Study
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Hart DC, Chair), Kathryn Steele (Hart DC, Secretary), Therese Abbott (Easement Holders), John Collman (Naturalist), Lindsay Mackay (Small Land Owners
Hazeley Heath Consultative Group 22/08/2017 Victoria Hall, Hartley Wintney Present: Phil Maund (Hart DC, Chair), Kathryn Steele (Hart DC, Secretary), Therese Abbott (Easement holders), John Collman (Naturalist), Lindsay Mackay (Small land owners) Apologies: Leigh Wallace (Hart DC), Mike Coates (RSPB), David Sexton (Mattingley Parish), Julian Bishop (Commoners) 1. Minutes from previous meeting Minutes were considered and approved. 2. Matters arising Hart Ponds - PM: Previously awaiting confirmation if consent is required for new ponds, consent is not required if an existing pond. Letter from Mattingley Parish - PM: Hart and RSPB are awaiting a signed letter of consent for the PINS application from Mattingley Parish Council. This has been completed via LW and MC. Natural England surveys - Action is outstanding for Matt Taylor (Natural England) to find out when the field units are due at Hazeley. ACTION: PM Bramshill crossing - PM: No change from 09/05/2017 meeting. ACTION: LW/PM Himalayan Balsam – PM: No enforcement available for neighbouring land on Hazeley streams and rivers. Hart can manage what they are responsible for. There is scope for an initiative such as volunteering to aid in the removal of Himalayan Balsam. Fencing Application – PM: HART and the RSPB have met and chose the same specification and structures. Naming of Features – JC: The features still require naming such as the scrapes. This is to be carried out during winter when there is less work on. HART and the RSPB to aid in choosing these alongside the management plan. Are these to be short coded names or site relevant names? ACTION: PM/ JC Surveys 1. -
Levels Or Changes?: Ethnic Context and the Political Demography of the UKIP Vote
Levels or Changes?: Ethnic Context and the Political Demography of the UKIP Vote Eric Kaufmann, Professor, Department of Politics, Birkbeck College, University of London, UK [email protected]; twitter: @epkaufm; web: www.sneps.net Abstract Does contact with ethnic minorities make native whites more or less concerned about immigration – and how does this affect voting for populist right parties? This paper asks how ethnic diversity and change affect white support for the UK Independence Party (UKIP) in Britain in the 2010-15 period. In so doing, it underscores the contradictory responses evoked by levels and changes in minority presence. Extant work posits that both work in the same direction on white threat perceptions. This work instead holds that local minority levels and changes work at cross-purposes: minority increase contributes to whites’ sense of threat while minority levels produce contact effects in the direction of inter-ethnic accommodation. In addition, this analysis adds to work on contextual effects by applying a more rigorous technique for addressing the problem of selection bias, casting doubt on the notion that there is ‘white flight’ of anti-immigration whites away from diverse areas or toward whiter neighbourhoods. Finally, few have remarked that today’s ethnic changes contribute to tomorrow’s ethnic levels. Since minorities are attracted to areas that already minority-dense, the two measures are strongly correlated. This presents a paradox – how do threat effects associated with change become contact effects? The data here suggest that yesterday’s changes fade through habituation and contact while yesterday’s ethnic levels become increasingly salient for contact over time. -
Surrey Landscape Character Assessment Figures 1-9-2015
KEY km north 0 1 2 3 4 5 Surrey District and Borough boundaries Natural England National Character Areas: Hampshire Downs (Area 130) High Weald (Area 122) Inner London (Area 112) Low Weald (Area 121) Spelthorne North Downs (Area 119) North Kent Plain (Area 113) Northern Thames Basin (Area 111) Thames Basin Heaths (Area 129) Runnymede Thames Basin Lowlands (Area 114) Thames Valley (Area 115) Wealden Greensand (Area 120) Elmbridge © Na tu ral Englan d copy righ t 201 4 Surrey Heath Epsom and Ewell Woking Reigate and Banstead Guildford Tandridge Mole Valley Waverley CLIENT: Surrey County Council & Surrey Hills AONB Board PROJECT: Surrey Landscape Character Assessm ent TITLE: Natural England National Character Areas SCALE: DATE: 1:160,000 at A3 September 2014 595.1 / 50 1 Figure 1 Based on Ordnance Survey mapping with permission of Her Majesty's Stationery Office Licence no. AR187372 © hankinson duckett associates The Stables, Howbery Park, Benson Lane, Wallingford, OX10 8B A t 01491 838175 e [email protected] w www.hda-enviro.co.uk Landscape Architecture Masterplanning Ecology KEY km north 0 1 2 3 4 5 Surrey District and Borough boundaries Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB): Surrey Hills AONB High Weald AONB Kent Downs AONB National Park: Spelthorne South Downs National Park Runnymede Elmbridge Surrey Heath Epsom and Ewell Woking Reigate and Banstead Guildford Tandridge Mole Valley Waverley CLIENT: Surrey County Council & Surrey Hills AONB Board PROJECT: Surrey Landscape Character Assessm ent TITLE: Surrey Districts & Boroughs, AONBs & National Park SCALE: DATE: 1:160,000 at A3 September 2014 595.1 / 50 2 Figure 2 Based on Ordnance Survey mapping with permission of Her Majesty's Stationery Office Licence no. -
Display PDF in Separate
BLACKWATER RIVER DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN April 1992 NRA National Rivers Authority Thames Region BLACKWATER RIVER CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION DRAFT April 1992 FOREWARD The National Rivers Authority was created in 1989 to conserve and enhance the natural water environment. In our role as 'Guardians of the Water Environment' we are committed to preparing a sound and thorough plan for the future management of the region's river catchments. This Draft Catchment Management Plan is a step towards achieving that goal for the Blackwater River catchment. As a vehicle for consultation it will provide a means of seeking a consensus on the way ahead and as a planning document it will be a means of seeking commitment from all parties to realising the environmental potential of the catchment. » '' I ■ ; We look forward to receiving the contributions of those organisations and individuals involved with the river and its catchment. Les Jones Regional General Manager Kings Meadow House Kings Meadow Road Reading Berks RGl 800 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY II Tel: Reading (0734) 535000 II Telex: 849614 NRATHA G Fax: (0734) 500388 121268 Blackwater Rivet DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN A p r i l 1 9 9 2 National Rivers Authority Thames Region King's Meadow House King's Meadow Road Reading BLACKWATER RIVER DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONTENTS LIST Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The National Rivers Authority 1.1 1.2 Catchment Management Planning 1.2 2.0 CATCHMENT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Introduction 2.1 2.2 General Features 2.2 2.3 Topography 2.4 2.4 -
Sustainability Appraisal Report
Bracknell Forest Borough Council Final Sustainability Appraisal Report Technical Document D Site Specific Appraisal: Full appraisal tables October 2006 Site specific sustainability appraisal The tables in the following document provide the full sustainability appraisal for each site proposed within the Site Allocations DPD and the policies within the document. Full details of how this appraisal was carried out, how the scores were calculated, and a summary of the results, can be found in Section 3 of the Final Sustainability Appraisal Report (November 2006). Scoring of Options Score + + The site or policy will have a very positive impact on the sustainability objective + The site or policy will have a slightly positive impact on the sustainability objective The site or policy will have a negligible or neutral impact on the sustainable objective. A recorded 0 neutral effect does not necessarily mean there will be no effect at the project level, but shows that at this strategic level there are no identifiable effects. - The site or policy will have a slightly negative impact on the sustainability objective - - The site or policy will have a very negative impact on the sustainability objective The outcome of implementing the site or policy could be dependant upon implementation or more i detail is required to make an assessment ? The impact of an issue cannot be predicted at this stage Sustainability Objectives Ref. number SA Objective Meet local housing needs by ensuring that everyone has the opportunity to live in a decent, 1 sustainably constructed house. 2 Reduce the risk of flooding and harm to people, property and the environment 3 Protect and enhance human wealth and wellbeing 4 Reduce poverty and social exclusion. -
Postal Sector Council Alternative Sector Name Month (Dates)
POSTAL COUNCIL ALTERNATIVE SECTOR NAME MONTH (DATES) SECTOR BN15 0 Adur District Council Sompting, Coombes 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN15 8 Adur District Council Lancing (Incl Sompting (South)) 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN15 9 Adur District Council Lancing (Incl Sompting (North)) 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN42 4 Adur District Council Southwick 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN43 5 Adur District Council Old Shoreham, Shoreham 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN43 6 Adur District Council Kingston By Sea, Shoreham-by-sea 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN12 5 Arun District Council Ferring, Goring-by-sea 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN16 1 Arun District Council East Preston 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN16 2 Arun District Council Rustington (South), Brighton 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN16 3 Arun District Council Rustington, Brighton 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN16 4 Arun District Council Angmering 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN17 5 Arun District Council Littlehampton (Incl Climping) 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN17 6 Arun District Council Littlehampton (Incl Wick) 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN17 7 Arun District Council Wick, Lyminster 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN18 0 Arun District Council Yapton, Walberton, Ford, Fontwell 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN18 9 Arun District Council Arundel (Incl Amberley, Poling, Warningcamp) -
Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Sincs Hampshire.Pdf
Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) within Hampshire © Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre No part of this documentHBIC may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recoding or otherwise without the prior permission of the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Central Grid SINC Ref District SINC Name Ref. SINC Criteria Area (ha) BD0001 Basingstoke & Deane Straits Copse, St. Mary Bourne SU38905040 1A 2.14 BD0002 Basingstoke & Deane Lee's Wood SU39005080 1A 1.99 BD0003 Basingstoke & Deane Great Wallop Hill Copse SU39005200 1A/1B 21.07 BD0004 Basingstoke & Deane Hackwood Copse SU39504950 1A 11.74 BD0005 Basingstoke & Deane Stokehill Farm Down SU39605130 2A 4.02 BD0006 Basingstoke & Deane Juniper Rough SU39605289 2D 1.16 BD0007 Basingstoke & Deane Leafy Grove Copse SU39685080 1A 1.83 BD0008 Basingstoke & Deane Trinley Wood SU39804900 1A 6.58 BD0009 Basingstoke & Deane East Woodhay Down SU39806040 2A 29.57 BD0010 Basingstoke & Deane Ten Acre Brow (East) SU39965580 1A 0.55 BD0011 Basingstoke & Deane Berries Copse SU40106240 1A 2.93 BD0012 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood North SU40305590 1A 3.63 BD0013 Basingstoke & Deane The Oaks Grassland SU40405920 2A 1.12 BD0014 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood South SU40505520 1B 1.87 BD0015 Basingstoke & Deane West Of Codley Copse SU40505680 2D/6A 0.68 BD0016 Basingstoke & Deane Hitchen Copse SU40505850 1A 13.91 BD0017 Basingstoke & Deane Pilot Hill: Field To The South-East SU40505900 2A/6A 4.62 -
The Economic Geography of the Gatwick Diamond
The Economic Geography of the Gatwick Diamond Hugo Bessis and Adeline Bailly October, 2017 1 Centre for Cities The economic geography of the Gatwick Diamond • October, 2017 About Centre for Cities Centre for Cities is a research and policy institute, dedicated to improving the economic success of UK cities. We are a charity that works with cities, business and Whitehall to develop and implement policy that supports the performance of urban economies. We do this through impartial research and knowledge exchange. For more information, please visit www.centreforcities.org/about About the authors Hugo Bessis is a Researcher at Centre for Cities [email protected] / 0207 803 4323 Adeline Bailly is a Researcher at Centre for Cities [email protected] / 0207 803 4317 Picture credit “Astral Towers” by Andy Skudder (http://bit.ly/2krxCKQ), licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 2.0) Supported by 2 Centre for Cities The economic geography of the Gatwick Diamond • October, 2017 Executive Summary The Gatwick Diamond is not only one of the South East’s strongest economies, but also one of the UK’s best performing areas. But growth brings with it a number of pressures too, which need to be managed to maintain the success of the area. This report measures the performance of the Gatwick Diamond relative to four comparator areas in the South East, benchmarking its success and setting out some of the policy challenges for the future. The Gatwick Diamond makes a strong contribution to the UK economy. It performs well above the national average on a range of different economic indicators, such as its levels of productivity, its share of high-skilled jobs, and its track record of attracting foreign investment. -
GB Electricity System Operator Daily Report Nationalgrideso UNRESTRICTED GB Electricity System Operator Daily Report Tuesday 11 June 2019
GB Electricity System Operator Daily Report nationalgridESO UNRESTRICTED GB Electricity System Operator Daily Report Tuesday 11 June 2019 Today’s High Level Risk Status Forecast for the next 24h Time General Status Voltage PSM Demand System Inertia 07:00 - 14:00 System Margins Weather Duty 14:00 - 21:00 Generation Transmission Officer 21:00 - 07:00 Active Constraints Today’s Minimum De-Rated Margin 3891.13 (SP 36) System Warnings None Generation Variable Current BMU Largest Loss Risk Demand 560MW Balancing Costs Last 241 hours'6 ENCC11 BM16 spend212631Total:36 £729k414651566166717681869196 £80k £60k £40k £20k £0k -£20k -£40k Yesterday’s Market Summary Cash out price (Max) £80.00 /MWh (SP 20) Cash Out Price (Min) £23.01 /MWh (SP 15) Peak Demand Yesterday 28,745 MW NETS Status Report; 11 June 2019 2 of 4 nationalgridESO UNRESTRICTED Interconnectors Today Import Export Netherlands (BritNed) 1060 1060 Fully Available France (IFA) 1500 1500 Pole 1 unavailable, due to RTS at 12:00hrs Belgium (Nemo) 1013 1013 Fullly Available Ireland (EWIC) 500 530 Fullly Available Northern Ireland (MOYLE) 395 500 Partially available. Wind Power Forecast Key: Expected embedded generation (MWs) Embedded Generation Forecast 10-JUN-2019 11-JUN-2019 12-JUN-2019 05:00 08:00 12:00 17:00 21:00 00:00 05:00 08:00 12:00 17:00 21:00 00:00 05:00 08:00 12:00 17:00 21:00 Solar (MW) 1 1640 3830 1700 46 0 0 1039 3564 2060 29 0 0 725 2193 1717 38 Wind (MW) 284 381 689 1203 1281 1361 1783 2073 2250 2137 1798 1760 1712 1706 1773 1751 1600 STOR (MW) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total (MW) 285 2021 4519 2903 1327 1361 1783 3112 5814 4197 1827 1760 1712 2431 3966 3468 1638 NETS Status Report; 11 June 2019 3 of 4 nationalgridESO UNRESTRICTED Weather Source Commentary 11/05/2019 Met Office Today: (Summary) SEPA Rain, heavy at times, and strong winds will continue across much of Natural Resources Wales England and Wales, although south and southeastern parts will be brighter with lighter winds but with heavy, thundery showers developing. -
Loddon Catchment Implementation Plan
Loddon Catchment Implementation Plan January 2012 – FOR COMMMENT (Version C2) Glossary.....................................................................................................................3 1 Introduction...................................................................................................6 2 Loddon catchment summary.......................................................................9 2.1 General Description .....................................................................................9 2.2 Catchment map........................................................................................... 10 3 Water body information ............................................................................. 11 3.1 Classification.................................................................................................. 11 3.2 Heavily Modified Water Bodies..................................................................... 11 4 Actions ........................................................................................................ 11 4.1 Operational monitoring (2010-12) ............................................................. 12 4.2 Investigations (2010-12)............................................................................. 12 4.3 Improvement actions (in place by 2012)................................................... 12 4.3.1 ‘Day Job’ activities.............................................................................................. 13 4.3.2 Field actions ...................................................................................................... -
Local Election Candidates 2016 Full List
Reading U.B.C. Abbey (1) Joe Sylvester Reading U.B.C. Battle (1) Alan Lockey Reading U.B.C. Caversham (1) David Foster Reading U.B.C. Church (1) Kathryn McCann Reading U.B.C. Katesgrove (1) Louise Keane Reading U.B.C. Kentwood (1) Ruth Shaffrey Reading U.B.C. Mapledurham (1) Brent Smith Reading U.B.C. Minster (1) Keith Johnson Reading U.B.C. Norcot (1) Jill Wigmore-Welsh Reading U.B.C. Park (1) Brenda McGonigle Reading U.B.C. Peppard (1) Sally Newman Reading U.B.C. Redlands (1) Kizzi Murtagh Reading U.B.C. Southcote (1) Doug Cresswell Reading U.B.C. Thames (1) Sarah McNamara Reading U.B.C. Tilehurst (1) Miriam Kennet Reading U.B.C. Whitley (1) Richard Black Wokingham U.D.C. Bulmershe & Whitegates (2) Adrian Windisch Wokingham U.D.C. Emmbrook (1) David Worley Wokingham U.D.C. Finchampstead North (1) Martyn Foss Wokingham U.D.C. Finchampstead South (1) Matthew Valler Wokingham U.D.C. Norreys (1) Anthea West Wokingham U.D.C. Remenham (1) Kezia Black Wokingham U.D.C. Shinfield South (1) Thomas Blomley Wokingham U.D.C. Wescott (1) David Chapman Wokingham U.D.C. Winnersh (1) Stephen Lloyd Milton Keynes B.C. Olney (1) Catherine Jean Rose Milton Keynes B.C. Stantonbury (1) Alexander Watson Fraser Milton Keynes B.C. Wolverton (1) Jennifer McElvie Marklew South Buckinghamshire B.C.Farnham Royal and Hedgerley (1) Ryan Sains Hastings B.C. Ashdown (1) Gabriel Carlyle Hastings B.C. Baird (1) Al Dixon Hastings B.C. -
Blackwater Valley Countryside Strategy 2011-15
Blackwater Valley Countryside 1 Strategy 2011-2016 Blackwater Valley Countryside Strategy 2011-15 This document has been prepared by the Blackwater Valley Countryside Partnership Ash Lock Cottage Government Road Aldershot Hants GU11 2PS Tel: 01252 331353 E-mail: [email protected] 05/11/2010 i Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 1 2. A STRATEGY FOR THE BLACKWATER VALLEY ................................................. 2 2.1. VISION .................................................................................................................. 2 2.2. AIMS ..................................................................................................................... 2 3. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 3 3.1. BACKGROUND....................................................................................................... 3 3.2. ACHIEVEMENTS..................................................................................................... 3 3.3. THE ROLE OF THE BLACKWATER VALLEY COUNTRYSIDE PARTNERSHIP ............... 4 3.4. AIM OF THE STRATEGY DOCUMENT....................................................................... 5 3.5. DEFINITION OF THE STRATEGY AREA .................................................................... 5 3.6. STRATEGY UPDATE..............................................................................................