DOCSLIB.ORG

Lead Area Local Authorities Covered by Funding Provisional 2020/21

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lead Area Local Authorities Covered by Funding Provisional 2020/21 Lead area Local authorities covered by funding Provisional 2020/21 funding allocation Adur and Worthing £421,578.00 Arun £318,817.00 Ashford £257,000.00 Babergh Babergh and Mid Suffolk (lead) £163,498.00 West Suffolk Barking and Dagenham £184,703.00 Barnet £636,845.00 Barnsley £102,900.00 Basildon £474,871.00 Basingstoke and Deane £199,850.00 Bath and North East Somerset £417,151.00 Bedford £986,915.00 Birmingham £684,666.00 Blackburn with Darwen Hyndburn BC £184,000.00 Ribble Valley BC Burnley BC Pendle BC Rossendale BC Blackpool £200,000.00 Bolton £124,997.00 Boston £385,451.00 Bournemouth, Christchurch and £1,401,333.00 Poole Bracknell Forest £356,141.00 Bradford £461,320.00 Breckland £106,500.00 Brent £827,422.00 Brighton and Hove £2,042,637.00 Bristol, City of £2,814,768.00 Bromley £103,654.00 Broxbourne £119,380.00 Buckinghamshire Aylesbury Vale £576,500.00 Wycombe Chiltern South Bucks Bury £40,000.00 Calderdale £253,945.00 Cambridge £486,457.00 Cambridgeshire County Council £229,500.00 Camden £1,327,000.00 Canterbury £584,739.00 Carlisle (lead for all Cumbrian Allerdale Borough Council £416,340.00 authorities) Barrow Borough Council Carlisle City Council Copeland Borough Council Cumbria County Council Eden District Council South Lakeland District Council Central Bedfordshire £329,938.00 Cheshire East £438,329.30 Cheshire West and Chester £731,034.00 Chichester £230,465.00 City of London £590,300.00 Colchester £296,144.00 Corby East Northamptonshire £113,000.00 Kettering Wellingborough Cornwall £1,696,467.00 County Durham £269,128.35 Coventry £464,689.00 Craven £146,999.00 Crawley £300,750.00 Croydon £1,218,037.00 Dacorum (lead) St Albans £115,181.35 Dartford £168,301.00 Derby £755,082.00 Derbyshire and Staffordshire Erewash BC (lead) £145,910.00 Moorlands Partnership Amber Valley DC Bolsover DC Chesterfield BC Derbyshire County Council Derbyshire Dales DC High Peak BC North East Derbyshire DC South Derbyshire DDC Staffordshire Moorlands DC Doncaster £462,028.00 Dorset £472,470.00 Dover, Folkestone and Hythe £469,651.00 Ealing £1,066,605.00 East Hertfordshire £58,806.00 East Lindsey £202,936.00 East Northamptonshire £48,494.00 East Riding of Yorkshire £84,644.00 East Staffordshire £124,300.00 East Suffolk £693,735.00 East Surrey Mole Valley £131,440.00 Tandridge Epsom & Ewell Reigate & Banstead Elmbridge £180,100.00 Enfield £699,000.00 Essex Braintree £389,590.00 Chelmsford Epping Forest Maldon Rochford Exeter £917,850.00 Fareham & Gosport £141,450.00 Fenland £340,320.00 GLA £6,617,785.05 Gloucestershire County Council Cheltenham £1,007,160.00 Cotswold Forest of Dean Stroud Tewkesbury Gloucester Gravesham £238,173.00 Great Yarmouth £111,735.00 Greater Manchester Combined £715,900.00 Greenwich £384,533.00 Guildford £300,470.00 Hackney £738,000.00 Halton £109,000.00 Hammersmith and Fulham £586,013.00 Haringey £953,379.24 Harlow £328,435.00 Harrogate £148,100.00 Harrow £176,500.00 Hart and Rushmoor £92,000.00 Hastings Eastbourne £1,529,518.00 Lewes Rother Wealden East Sussex Havant and East Hampshire £92,774.00 Havering £221,524.33 Herefordshire, County of £400,022.00 Hertsmere £149,599.00 Hillingdon £2,186,647.00 Horsham and Mid Sussex £317,717.00 Hounslow £311,000.00 Huntingdonshire, East and £27,000.00 South Cambridgeshire Ipswich £498,793.00 Isle of Wight £288,700.00 Islington £1,975,040.00 Kensington and Chelsea £557,245.00 Kent Canterbury £370,507.00 Maidstone Medway Thanet Kettering £114,191.00 King's Lynn and West Norfolk £121,270.00 Kingston upon Hull, City of £996,176.82 Kingston upon Thames £661,632.98 Kirklees £321,290.00 Knowsley £152,000.00 Lambeth £756,100.00 Lancaster Wyre £129,000.00 Fylde Leeds £732,084.00 Leicester £566,783.00 Lewisham £720,420.68 Lichfield Cannock Chase £54,999.72 Lincoln £1,070,235.00 Lincolnshire South Kesteven £595,523.00 North Kesteven West Lindsey South Holland Liverpool £861,685.00 Luton £1,158,463.00 Maidstone £375,750.00 Manchester £724,212.00 Mansfield £310,628.00 Medway £867,450.00 Mendip £264,429.20 Merton £303,500.00 Mid Devon and East Devon £230,805.00 Milton Keynes £870,443.00 New Forest £221,600.00 Newcastle upon Tyne £490,194.00 Newcastle-under-Lyme £45,000.00 Newham £1,237,750.00 North Devon £317,600.00 North East Lincolnshire £476,750.00 North East Region Durham County Council (lead authority) £1,476,064.00 Stockton Borough Council Hartlepool Council Middlesbrough Council Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council Darlington Borough Council Gateshead Council Sunderland City Council South Tyneside Council North Tyneside Council Northumberland County Council North Lincolnshire £222,014.00 North London Housing Islington (lead) £921,503.00 Partnership Barnet Camden Enfield Haringey Westminster North Norfolk £75,996.00 North Somerset £323,976.00 North West Leicestershire Blaby £210,541.00 Charnwood Harborough Hinckley & Bosworth Melton Oadby and Wigston Rutland Northampton £514,100.00 Norwich £869,534.00 Nottingham £1,392,813.00 Nottinghamshire County Ashfield £836,916.60 Bassetlaw Broxtowe Gedling Mansfield Newark and Sherwood Rushcliffe Nuneaton and Bedworth £150,000.00 Oldham £37,000.00 Oxfordshire Oxford City (lead authority) £1,543,887.00 South Oxfordshire DC West Oxfordshire DC Cherwell DC Vale of White Horse DC Oxfordshire County Council Peterborough £700,076.00 Plymouth £762,110.00 Portsmouth £649,250.00 Preston £901,528.00 Reading £647,099.00 Redbridge £625,000.00 Reigate and Banstead £80,000.00 Richmond upon Thames £569,106.00 Rochdale £32,029.00 Rotherham £378,726.00 Rugby £120,000.00 Ryedale and Selby £99,218.00 Salford £1,368,125.00 Scarborough £136,148.00 Sedgemoor £249,000.00 Sefton £467,522.00 Sevenoaks £55,479.00 Sheffield £808,540.00 Shropshire £65,000.00 Slough £569,900.00 Solihull £80,314.00 Somerset West and Taunton £289,740.00 South Gloucestershire £80,700.00 South Norfolk and Broadland £156,420.00 South Somerset £66,261.00 Southampton £915,120.00 Southend-on-sea £705,155.00 Southwark £1,754,426.00 Spelthorne £146,500.00 St. Helens £210,000.00 Stafford £64,151.00 Stevenage £177,550.00 Stockport £40,000.00 Stoke-on-Trent £952,046.08 Stratford-on-Avon £134,167.00 Surrey Heath £82,600.00 Sutton £209,613.00 Swale £218,320.00 Swindon £464,764.00 Tameside £471,500.00 Teignbridge South Hams £149,994.50 West Devon Telford and Wrekin £269,399.04 Tendring £72,485.00 Test Valley £103,224.00 Thanet £1,359,053.00 Thurrock £258,674.24 Tonbridge and Malling Tunbridge Wells £164,520.00 Sevenoaks Torbay £620,000.00 Torridge £78,011.00 Tower Hamlets £635,961.00 Trafford £40,000.00 Tunbridge Wells Combined with Tonbridge and Malling £260,680.00 Wakefield £192,500.00 Walsall £555,837.00 Waltham Forest £813,941.00 Wandsworth £690,244.00 Warrington £546,024.00 Warwick £660,028.00 Watford £416,003.40 Wellingborough £211,000.00 Welwyn Hatfield £123,140.00 West Berkshire £475,009.00 West Kent Maidstone (lead) £198,834.00 Tunbridge Wells BC Tonbridge and Malling BC Sevenoaks DC West London Brent £1,450,916.00 Ealing Hammersmith and Fulham Harrow Hillingdon Hounslow Kensington and Chelsea West Suffolk (lead) West Suffolk £453,359.00 Babergh and Mid Suffolk Westminster £2,380,435.00 Wigan £728,086 Wiltshire £256,725.00 Winchester £75,000.00 Windsor and Maidenhead £490,000.00 Wirral £292,345.00 Woking £228,500.00 Wokingham £91,350.00 Wolverhampton £390,000.00 Worcestershire Worcester City Council (lead authority) £672,308.09 Bromsgrove Malvern Redditch Wychavon Wyre Forest York £433,141.00 111,479,561.97 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Live Vacancies Report - Mole Valley (As of 18/11/2019)
    Live Vacancies Report - Mole Valley (as of 18/11/2019) Date The following information has been designed to be shared with the relevant local Job Centre Plus / Stake Holder offices with the intention that they can promote these opportunities to their clients. It is important that these reports are used only as a guide, and that you log onto Find an apprenticeship for the most up to date information. Please be aware that vacancies that appear to have no applications may be recruiting via their own recruitment pages - these will be shaded green. Please do not contact the employer unless stated in the vacancy. If you require more information than is described, please contact the learning provider in the first instance; their contact details will be available in the advert. Registered & Currently Active Candidates refers to those who have registered and engaged with the Find an apprenticeship system and are still active on the system. (Candidates can become inactive voluntarily e.g. by being successful with no need to use the system further) Key: No applications have yet been received for this vacancy Applications going directly to employer website and can't be counted Vacancy Title Vacancy Title Apprentice Support Care Worker Infrastructure Technician Apprenticeship - 19277 Business Admin Apprentice Dorking ARC Volkswagen Group Mechanical, Electrical and Trim (MET) Technician Apprentice Dorking ARC Volkswagen Group Paint Technician Apprentice Level 2 Hospitality Team Member Apprenticeship Optical Assistant Apprenticeship - LEATHERHEAD SPECSAVERS
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Summary
    CLIMATE EMERGENCY PROGRESS CHECKLIST - 10 December 2019 NB. This is work in progress! We have almost certainly missed some actions. Please contact [email protected] with any news or updates. County/Authority Council Status County/Authority Council Status Brighton & Hove BRIGHTON & HOVE CITY COUNCIL DECLARED Dec 2018 KENT COUNTY COUNCIL Motion Passed May 2019 WEST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL Motion Passed - April 2019 Ashford Borough Council Motion Passed July 2019 Adur Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Canterbury City Council DECLARED July 2019 Arun District Council DECLARED Nov 2019 Dartford Borough Council DECLARED Oct 2019 Chichester City Council DECLARED June 2019 Dover District Council Campaign in progress West Sussex Chichester District Council DECLARED July 2019 Folkestone and Hythe District Council DECLARED July 2019 Crawley Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Gravesham Borough Council DECLARED June 2019 Kent Horsham District Council Motion Passed - June 2019 Maidstone Borough Council DECLARED April 2019 Mid Sussex District Council Motion Passed - June 2019 Medway Council DECLARED April 2019 Worthing Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Sevenoaks District Council Motion Passed - Nov 2019 EAST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL DECLARED Oct 2019 Swale Borough Council DECLARED June 2019 Eastbourne Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Thanet District Council DECLARED July 2019 Hastings Borough Council DECLARED Dec 2018 Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Motion Passed July 2019 East Sussex Lewes District Council DECLARED July 2019 Tunbridge
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. Principal Area Boundary Review Borough of Gravesham/Borough of Dartford/District of Sevenoaks LOCAL GOVEHNICWT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND HEK)hT NO. LOCAL GOVKRflUEJlT BOI'NJJAHY COMMISSION FOR CHAIRMAN Mr C J Ellerton CMC MB1C Mr J U Powell PRICE FGV* Lady Aoknur lir T Brockbank DI^ Professor G E Cherry Mr K J L Newell Me B Qcholee QBE THE RT. HON. PATRICK JENKIN MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT 1. At present the New Barn residential area is split between Dartford Borough, Sevenoaks District and Gravesham Borough; the part situated in Dartford is in the parish of ^outhfleet; the part in Sevenoaks is in the parish of Longfield, whilst the part in Gravesham is unparished. On 30 November 1979» Gravesham Borough Council requested ue to review the boundaries between the districts of Gravesham, Dartford and Sevenoaks in the vicinity of New Barn. Their request was in response to representations from the New Barn Ratepayers Association for the whole of the New Barn residential area to be incorporated within Gravesham Borough. The Association based their representations on a survey of opinion which they carried out in 1978 among the residents of New Barn on the question of whether the area should be under one authority, and if so, which one. The results indicated that a majority (8?#) of residents indicating a view preferred to see New Barn under one authority and a large proportion (6990 of these considered that this should be Gravesham. 2. We noted that Kent County Council, Dartford Borough Council, Sevenoaks District Council, and Longfield Parish Council were all opposed to a review beinp undertaken at that time, although Kent County Council and Dartford BOrough Council did a^ree that the current boundaries in the New Barn area were not wholly satisfactory.
    [Show full text]
  • Levels Or Changes?: Ethnic Context and the Political Demography of the UKIP Vote
    Levels or Changes?: Ethnic Context and the Political Demography of the UKIP Vote Eric Kaufmann, Professor, Department of Politics, Birkbeck College, University of London, UK [email protected]; twitter: @epkaufm; web: www.sneps.net Abstract Does contact with ethnic minorities make native whites more or less concerned about immigration – and how does this affect voting for populist right parties? This paper asks how ethnic diversity and change affect white support for the UK Independence Party (UKIP) in Britain in the 2010-15 period. In so doing, it underscores the contradictory responses evoked by levels and changes in minority presence. Extant work posits that both work in the same direction on white threat perceptions. This work instead holds that local minority levels and changes work at cross-purposes: minority increase contributes to whites’ sense of threat while minority levels produce contact effects in the direction of inter-ethnic accommodation. In addition, this analysis adds to work on contextual effects by applying a more rigorous technique for addressing the problem of selection bias, casting doubt on the notion that there is ‘white flight’ of anti-immigration whites away from diverse areas or toward whiter neighbourhoods. Finally, few have remarked that today’s ethnic changes contribute to tomorrow’s ethnic levels. Since minorities are attracted to areas that already minority-dense, the two measures are strongly correlated. This presents a paradox – how do threat effects associated with change become contact effects? The data here suggest that yesterday’s changes fade through habituation and contact while yesterday’s ethnic levels become increasingly salient for contact over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk's Framework for Growth
    Suffolk’s Framework for Growth 1 Foreword Suffolk’s local authorities are working together to address our residents and businesses’ future needs and deliver our growth plans in an inclusive and integrated way. Responding to the Government’s ambitions to increase the nation’s overall prosperity and recognising past growth has not always benefitted all communities equally, our Framework sets out how we will utilise Suffolk’s potential to ensure we plan and achieve the growth that is right for us and our communities. A Framework provides a mechanism to bring together work across teams; including local planning, economic development, skills, and housing; alongside our partners at the University of Suffolk, Suffolk Chamber of Commerce and New Anglia LEP. It sets out how we are working across our administrative boundaries and with our key partners to deliver our physical development (homes, employment sites, public and private buildings) in a way that matches our communities’ aspirations for growth and ensures we can match this with the investment in our infrastructure both now and in the future. The Framework includes links where you can find further, more detailed information. It builds on our conversations with Government, our partners and our communities, which started with our proposals for devolution and have been built on through our responses to both the Industrial Strategy and the Housing White Paper. It will provide the mechanism for monitoring our successes and realigning work that is not achieving the outcomes we anticipate. This Framework has been agreed by all Suffolk Local Authority Leaders and the joint Suffolk Growth Portfolio Holders (GP/H).
    [Show full text]
  • Surrey Landscape Character Assessment Figures 1-9-2015
    KEY km north 0 1 2 3 4 5 Surrey District and Borough boundaries Natural England National Character Areas: Hampshire Downs (Area 130) High Weald (Area 122) Inner London (Area 112) Low Weald (Area 121) Spelthorne North Downs (Area 119) North Kent Plain (Area 113) Northern Thames Basin (Area 111) Thames Basin Heaths (Area 129) Runnymede Thames Basin Lowlands (Area 114) Thames Valley (Area 115) Wealden Greensand (Area 120) Elmbridge © Na tu ral Englan d copy righ t 201 4 Surrey Heath Epsom and Ewell Woking Reigate and Banstead Guildford Tandridge Mole Valley Waverley CLIENT: Surrey County Council & Surrey Hills AONB Board PROJECT: Surrey Landscape Character Assessm ent TITLE: Natural England National Character Areas SCALE: DATE: 1:160,000 at A3 September 2014 595.1 / 50 1 Figure 1 Based on Ordnance Survey mapping with permission of Her Majesty's Stationery Office Licence no. AR187372 © hankinson duckett associates The Stables, Howbery Park, Benson Lane, Wallingford, OX10 8B A t 01491 838175 e [email protected] w www.hda-enviro.co.uk Landscape Architecture Masterplanning Ecology KEY km north 0 1 2 3 4 5 Surrey District and Borough boundaries Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB): Surrey Hills AONB High Weald AONB Kent Downs AONB National Park: Spelthorne South Downs National Park Runnymede Elmbridge Surrey Heath Epsom and Ewell Woking Reigate and Banstead Guildford Tandridge Mole Valley Waverley CLIENT: Surrey County Council & Surrey Hills AONB Board PROJECT: Surrey Landscape Character Assessm ent TITLE: Surrey Districts & Boroughs, AONBs & National Park SCALE: DATE: 1:160,000 at A3 September 2014 595.1 / 50 2 Figure 2 Based on Ordnance Survey mapping with permission of Her Majesty's Stationery Office Licence no.
    [Show full text]
  • Bolsover, North East Derbyshire & Chesterfield
    ‘extremewheels roadshows’ Summer 2017 BOLSOVER, NORTH EAST DERBYSHIRE & CHESTERFIELD JULY 15th Chesterfield - Stand Rd Rec Ground 1 - 3pm 15th Tupton - Rugby Club 1 - 3pm 24th Hasland - Eastwood Park 1 - 3pm 15th Chesterfield - Queens Park 6 - 8pm 25th Chesterfield - Stand Rd Rec Ground 1 - 3pm 15th Mickley - Community Hut 6 - 8pm 25th Tupton - Rugby Club 1 - 3pm 16th Hasland - Eastwood Park 1 - 3pm 25th Chesterfield - Queens Park 6 - 8pm 17th Whitwell - Skatepark 1 - 3pm 25th Mickley - Community Hut 6 - 8pm 17th Grassmoor - Barnes Park 1 - 3pm 27th Whitwell - Skatepark 1 - 3pm 17th Hasland - Eastwood Park 6 - 8pm 27th Grassmoor - Barnes Park 1 - 3pm 18th Bolsover - Hornscroft Park 6 - 8pm 27th Hasland - Eastwood Park 6 - 8pm 18th Shirebrook - Skatepark 6 - 8pm 28th Bolsover - Hornscroft Park 6 - 8pm 22nd Chesterfield - Stand Rd Rec Ground 1 - 3pm AUGUST 22nd Tupton - Rugby Club 1 - 3pm 1st Chesterfield - Stand Rd Rec Ground 1 - 3pm 22nd Chesterfield - Queens Park 6 - 8pm 1st Tupton - Rugby Club 1 - 3pm 22nd Mickley - Community Hut 6 - 8pm 1st Chesterfield - Queens Park 6 - 8pm 24th Whitwell - Skatepark 1 - 3pm 1st Mickley - Community Hut 6 - 8pm 24th Hasland - Eastwood Park 6 - 8pm 2nd Hasland - Eastwood Park 1 - 3pm 25th Bolsover - Hornscroft Park 6 - 8pm 2nd Pilsley - Skatepark 6 - 8pm 25th Shirebrook - Skatepark 6 - 8pm 3rd Whitwell - Skatepark 1 - 3pm 29th Chesterfield - Stand Rd Rec Ground 1 - 3pm 3rd Grassmoor - Barnes Park 1 - 3pm 29th Tupton - Rugby Club 1 - 3pm 3rd Hasland - Eastwood Park 6 - 8pm 29th Chesterfield - Queens Park
    [Show full text]
  • Crawley Borough Council
    Agenda item no. 9 GATWICK AIRPORT CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE REPORT BY THE DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT AND RESOURCES – CRAWLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL List of Planning Applications Determined During the Period 1st April to 30th June 2013 CR/2011/0573/CON NORTH TERMINAL, GATWICK AIRPORT, FURLONG WAY, GATWICK, CRAWLEY CONSULTATION FROM GATWICK AIRPORT LIMITED FOR LANDSCAPING, PUBLIC REALM ENHANCEMENTS AND PROVISION OF A COVERED WALKWAY Tandridge District Council No Objection Mole Valley District Council No Objection WSCC None Received Reigate & Banstead BC No Objection The Safeguarding Department No Objection – Cranes condition Mid Sussex District Council None Received Horsham District Council None Received Surrey County Council None Received. NATS No Objection Counter Terrorism Security Advisor None received Decision – Permit 03/05/2013 CR/2011/0540/CON NORTHGATE HOUSE, LONDON GATWICK AIRPORT, LONGBRIDGE GATE, GATWICK, CRAWLEY CONSULTATION FROM GATWICK AIRPORT FOR THE CHANGE OF USE TO THE NORTHGATE BUILDING, NORTH TERMINAL FROM B8 (STORAGE) TO B1 (BUSINESS) Mid Sussex District Council No comments Horsham District Council None Received Tandridge District Council No Objection Mole Valley District Council None Received WSCC None Received Reigate & Banstead BC No Objection Surrey County Council No comment Decision – No objection 01/05/2013 The applicant is advised however to ensure that flood resiliance measure are built into the development that is located in an Environment Agency Zone 3 Flood Risk Area. CR/2013/0103/FUL FIRST POINT, BUCKINGHAM GATE, GATWICK, CRAWLEY INSTALLATION OF 1 X AIR HANDLING UNIT, 1 X HEAT RECOVERY UNIT WITHIN THE EXISTING ACOUSTIC ENCLOSURE ON ROOF AND 2 X EXTERNAL CONDENSERS ON ROOF ADJACENT TO ENCLOSURE NATS None received GAL Aerodrome Safeguarding No Objection - subject to Cranes Informative CBC Environmental Health No comments Decision – Permit 25/04/2013 Informative in relation to cranes, in addition to standard conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Chilterns Ancient Woodland Survey Appendix: South Bucks District
    Ancient Woodland Inventory for the Chilterns Appendix - South Bucks District Chiltern Woodlands CONSERVATION BOARD Project Chiltern District Council WYCOMBE DISTRICT COUNCIL an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty 1. Introduction his appendix summarises results from the Chilterns Ancient Woodland Survey for the whole of South Bucks District in the County of Buckinghamshire (see map 1 for details). For more information on the project and Tits methodology, please refer to the main report, 1which can be downloaded from www.chilternsaonb.org The Chilterns Ancient Woodland Survey area includes parts of Buckinghamshire, Bedfordshire, Hertfordshire and Oxfordshire. The extent of the project area included, but was not confined to, the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). 2 The work follows on from previous revisions in the South East. The Chilterns survey was hosted by the Chilterns Conservation Board with support from the Chiltern Woodlands Project, Thames Valley Environmental Records Centre (TVERC) and Surrey Biodiversity Information Centre (SBIC). The work was funded by Buckinghamshire County Council, Chilterns Conservation Board, Chiltern District Council, Dacorum Borough Council, Forestry Commission, Hertfordshire County Council, Natural England and Wycombe District Council. Map 1: Project aims The Survey Area, showing Local Authority areas covered and the Chilterns AONB The primary aim of the County Boundaries survey was to revise and Chilterns AONB update the Ancient Entire Districts Woodland Inventory and Chiltern District
    [Show full text]
  • District Council Report
    DISTRICT COUNCILLORS’ REPORT TO THE 2019 CLAYDON ANNUAL PARISH MEETING District Elections Elections to the 26 new wards that comprise Mid Suffolk District Council, after the boundary changes, took place on Thursday 2nd May 2019. All the wards were contested in this election. Overall turnout was 34.0% although in the Claydon & Barham ward turnout was marginally lower at 31%. The 26 wards comprise of 34 seats with some wards, such as Claydon & Barham, being twice the electoral size of a single member ward and therefore represented by two councillors. Claydon & Barham again returned two Conservative councillors and our contact details can be found at the end of this report. District-wide however produced a different outcome with a finely balanced council now of 16 Conservatives, 1 Independent, 12 Greens and 5 Liberal Democrats. At the time of writing this report, this change from the previous large Conservative majority means that there is much still to be resolved. However, the Conservatives, as the largest party, intend to form an Administration to run the council. Local Planning Issues When we reported to you a year ago for 2018 annual meeting, the large planning application at Whitton Rural had been refused at committee and the large Barham Church Lane application had a ‘minded to refuse’ status. The Whitton applicant took their application to appeal and the planning inspector heard that appeal at a public enquiry before Christmas. Mid Suffolk, as promised, put up a rigorous and costly defence of their committee decision at the appeal. Very unusually, the applicant requested during the appeal that the site be looked at as two-part sites, separated by the treeline at the top of Whitton hill, should the inspector not feel able to grant permission for the full site.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk County Council
    Suffolk County Council Western Suffolk Employment Land Review Final Report May 2009 GVA Grimley Ltd 10 Stratton Street London W1J 8JR 0870 900 8990 www.gvagrimley.co.uk This report is designed to be printed double sided. Suffolk County Council Western Suffolk Employment Land Review Final Report May 2009 Reference: P:\PLANNING\621\Instruction\Clients\Suffolk County Council\Western Suffolk ELR\10.0 Reports\Final Report\Final\WesternSuffolkELRFinalReport090506.doc Contact: Michael Dall Tel: 020 7911 2127 Email: [email protected] www.gvagrimley.co.uk Suffolk County Council Western Suffolk Employment Land Review CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 1 2. POLICY CONTEXT....................................................................................................... 5 3. COMMERCIAL PROPERTY MARKET ANALYSIS.................................................... 24 4. EMPLOYMENT LAND SUPPLY ANALYSIS.............................................................. 78 5. EMPLOYMENT FLOORSPACE PROJECTIONS..................................................... 107 6. BALANCING DEMAND AND SUPPLY .................................................................... 147 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS......................................................... 151 Suffolk County Council Western Suffolk Employment Land Review LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 The Western Suffolk Study Area 5 Figure 2 Claydon Business Park, Claydon 26 Figure 3 Industrial Use in
    [Show full text]
  • Support to Go Home Service
    Information for patients, family, carers and staff Support to go home service What is this service? The Support to Go Home Service is comprised of health and care professionals working together to provide short term care provision for when you return home. Your social worker will have arranged a care package for you with a confirmed start date. When there is a delay to your start date, our service will be able to provide interim care to enable you to be discharged home. This service is hosted by West Suffolk Hospital and is provided in partnership with the West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust and Suffolk County Council. There is no cost to you for this service for patients who are receiving a social care funded package of care. The team consists of an occupational therapist, care co-ordinator and support workers who will help you with your daily tasks, such as washing, dressing and meal preparation, within your home. They will work closely with you, your family, social care and the community teams, to ensure you experience a seamless service throughout your period of recovery. Aims of the service To enhance your recovery by not delaying your discharge, thus reducing your Source: Support To Go Home Service Reference No: 6306-2 Issue date: 29/4/19 Review date: 29/4/22 Page 1 of 3 risk of infections associated with a prolonged admission. To maximise your independence by offering early recovery support within your home. To provide advice, follow-up visits and referrals to external agencies as required. To ensure an appropriate level of care is provided according to your needs.
    [Show full text]