DOCSLIB.ORG

Loddon Catchment Implementation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Loddon Catchment Implementation Plan Loddon Catchment Implementation Plan January 2012 – FOR COMMMENT (Version C2) Glossary.....................................................................................................................3 1 Introduction...................................................................................................6 2 Loddon catchment summary.......................................................................9 2.1 General Description .....................................................................................9 2.2 Catchment map........................................................................................... 10 3 Water body information ............................................................................. 11 3.1 Classification.................................................................................................. 11 3.2 Heavily Modified Water Bodies..................................................................... 11 4 Actions ........................................................................................................ 11 4.1 Operational monitoring (2010-12) ............................................................. 12 4.2 Investigations (2010-12)............................................................................. 12 4.3 Improvement actions (in place by 2012)................................................... 12 4.3.1 ‘Day Job’ activities.............................................................................................. 13 4.3.2 Field actions ....................................................................................................... 13 5 Partners....................................................................................................... 13 6 Sub catchments.......................................................................................... 15 6.1 River Loddon .............................................................................................. 15 6.1.1 What is failing ..................................................................................................... 16 6.1.2 Reasons for failure ............................................................................................. 16 6.1.3 Field Actions....................................................................................................... 16 6.2 Emm Brook ................................................................................................. 18 6.2.1 What is failing ..................................................................................................... 18 6.2.2 Reasons for failure ............................................................................................. 18 6.2.3 Field Actions....................................................................................................... 18 6.3 Blackwater & Cove Brook.......................................................................... 19 6.3.1 What is failing ..................................................................................................... 19 6.3.2 Reasons for failure ............................................................................................. 20 6.3.3 Field Actions....................................................................................................... 21 Loddon Catchment Implementation Plan Page 1 19/03/2012 6.4 Whitewater .................................................................................................. 22 6.4.1 What is failing ..................................................................................................... 22 6.4.2 Reasons for failure ............................................................................................. 22 6.4.3 Field Actions....................................................................................................... 22 6.5 Hart and Fleet Brook .................................................................................. 24 6.5.1 What is failing ..................................................................................................... 24 6.5.2 Reasons for failure ............................................................................................. 24 6.5.3 Field Actions....................................................................................................... 25 7 How to get involved.................................................................................... 26 8 Useful links and other reports:.................................................................. 26 APPENDICES........................................................................................................... 27 Appendix I - Schematic of stages undertaken during the Catchment plan and current delivery position............................................................................ 27 Appendix II - Summary of river, canal, lake and surface water transfer water body classifications (2010 data used) ...................................................... 28 Appendix III - Predicted ‘element’ improvements in the first RBMP cycle ..... 30 Appendix IV - Operational monitoring (2010 – 12) ............................................ 31 Appendix V - Investigations (2010-12) ............................................................... 32 Appendix VI – Summary of improvement actions for priority river water bodies.......................................................................................................... 36 Loddon Catchment Implementation Plan Page 2 19/03/2012 Glossary AWB Artificial Water Body - A man-made surface water body, rather than a modified natural water body, which supports important aquatic ecosystems. It includes canals and some man-made reservoirs. CAMS Catchment Abstraction Management Strategies CIP Catchment Implementation Plan Classification Method for distinguishing the environmental condition or “status” of water bodies and putting them into one category or another e.g. good or moderate ecological status. Diffuse source Pollution resulting from scattering or dispersed sources that are collectively significant but to which effects normally difficult to attribute individually. EA Environment Agency Element A feature of an aquatic (surface water) ecosystem that can be described as a number to give a classification. A biological element is a collective term for a particular characteristic group of animals or plants present in an aquatic ecosystem (for example phytoplankton; benthic invertebrates; phytobenthos; macrophytes; macroalgae; angiosperms; fish). Eutrophication ‘Eutrophication’ is the process whereby excessive nutrients, especially nitrogen and phosphorus compounds, cause an accelerated growth of algae and plants. This growth affects water quality and the balance of organisms such as fish. High phosphorus concentrations are the main cause of eutrophication in fresh waters. ftRBMP First Thames River Basin Management Plan GES Good Ecological Status - The objective for a surface water body to have biological, structural and chemical characteristics similar to those expected under nearly undisturbed conditions. GEP Good Ecological Potential - Those surface waters which are identified as Heavily Modified Water Bodies and Artificial Water Bodies must achieve ‘good ecological potential’. Good potential is a recognition that changes to morphology may make good ecological status very difficult to meet. In the first cycle of river Loddon Catchment Implementation Plan Page 3 19/03/2012 basin planning good potential may be defined in relation to the mitigation measures required to achieve it and a willingness to pay for those measures. HMWB Heavily Modified Water Body - A surface water body that does not achieve good ecological status because of substantial changes to its physical character resulting from physical alterations caused by human use, and which has been designated, in accordance with criteria specified in the Water Framework Directive, as ‘heavily modified’. Hydromorphology Describes the hydrological and geomorphological processes and attributes of surface water bodies. For rivers, hydromorphology describes the form and function of the channel as well as its connectivity (up and downstream and with groundwater) and flow regime. This defines its ability to allow migration of aquatic organisms and maintain natural continuity of sediment transport throughout the fluvial system. The Water Framework Directive requires surface waters to be managed in such a way as to safeguard their hydrology and geomorphology so that ecology is protected. Phosphates Phosphorus in our river comes from a number of sources including treated sewage effluent and agriculture. P is essential for plant growth but at higher levels can lead to eutrophication and a change to the river's ecology. Point source Pollution arising from an identifiable and localised area, structure or facility, such as a discharge pipe or landfill. Sediment The term sediment refers to anything that is not dissolved or in solution and which can be removed by filtration or settlement. The term includes solids that are floating on top, or suspended within the water. Phosphate is often associated with sediment as it is bound to the soil (unlike nitrates, which are more soluble). STW Sewage Treatment Works WB Water Body - A manageable unit of surface water, being the whole (or part) of a stream, river or canal, lake or reservoir, transitional water (estuary) or stretch of coastal water. A ‘body of groundwater’ is a distinct volume of groundwater
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hart DC, Chair), Kathryn Steele (Hart DC, Secretary), Therese Abbott (Easement Holders), John Collman (Naturalist), Lindsay Mackay (Small Land Owners
    Hazeley Heath Consultative Group 22/08/2017 Victoria Hall, Hartley Wintney Present: Phil Maund (Hart DC, Chair), Kathryn Steele (Hart DC, Secretary), Therese Abbott (Easement holders), John Collman (Naturalist), Lindsay Mackay (Small land owners) Apologies: Leigh Wallace (Hart DC), Mike Coates (RSPB), David Sexton (Mattingley Parish), Julian Bishop (Commoners) 1. Minutes from previous meeting Minutes were considered and approved. 2. Matters arising Hart Ponds - PM: Previously awaiting confirmation if consent is required for new ponds, consent is not required if an existing pond. Letter from Mattingley Parish - PM: Hart and RSPB are awaiting a signed letter of consent for the PINS application from Mattingley Parish Council. This has been completed via LW and MC. Natural England surveys - Action is outstanding for Matt Taylor (Natural England) to find out when the field units are due at Hazeley. ACTION: PM Bramshill crossing - PM: No change from 09/05/2017 meeting. ACTION: LW/PM Himalayan Balsam – PM: No enforcement available for neighbouring land on Hazeley streams and rivers. Hart can manage what they are responsible for. There is scope for an initiative such as volunteering to aid in the removal of Himalayan Balsam. Fencing Application – PM: HART and the RSPB have met and chose the same specification and structures. Naming of Features – JC: The features still require naming such as the scrapes. This is to be carried out during winter when there is less work on. HART and the RSPB to aid in choosing these alongside the management plan. Are these to be short coded names or site relevant names? ACTION: PM/ JC Surveys 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Bramshill Site of Special Scientific Interest
    The Dragonflies of Bramshill Site of Special Scientific Interest Freshwater Habitats Trust Author Ken Crick Forward Bramshill Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) is a Flagship Pond Site. Part of a network of the very best of Britain’s ponds; sites of exceptional importance for freshwater wildlife and some of our finest freshwater habitats. The Flagship sites can be a single special pond, or more commonly group of ponds, selected because they support rich, often irreplaceable, communities and species at risk of extinction. They represent some of the least impacted, most diverse pond habitats remaining in the country. Many of our nation’s most beautiful and biodiverse waterbodies have degraded irrevocably, and it’s critically important that the remaining sites are well protected and well managed. In 2015, with funding from the Heritage Lottery Fund, Freshwater Habitats Trust launched the Flagship Ponds project, Mats of Water Crowfoot flower on Bramshill working with land managers and community groups to ensure that the most Plantation’s Longwater. critical pond sites in Britain were protected for the long term. This book has been published with the aim of enabling people visiting this, Introduction immensely important Flagship Pond Site in Northern Hampshire, to identify the dragonflies and damselflies they encounter - by reference to a simple text This nationally important Site of managed by Forestry Commission and in places subsequent backfilling Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) England (FCE), please see the site with landfill, Bramshill SSSI has and photographs. It should also inform those visiting the site of the location is notified as such in part for its map on page 6 which depicts the through a combination of careful of the majority of freshwater habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Basing and Lychpit 3
    O LD B ASING &LYCHPIT V ILLAGE D ESIGN S TATEMENT 2006 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 PARISH MAP 2 HISTORY OF OLD BASING AND LYCHPIT 3 LANDSCAPE AND SURROUNDINGS 6 The countryside around the village 6 Views into and out of Old Basing and Lychpit 7 Significant features of the local ecology 7 Guidelines 7 PATTERN AND CONTENT OF THE SETTLEMENT 9 Important open spaces 9 Other amenities 10 Trees, hedgerows and boundaries 10 Footpaths 11 Guidelines 12 BUILDINGS AND MATERIALS 13 Style and form 13 The Conservation Area 13 1940s-70s developments 14 Late 20th century developments 14 Significant historical buildings 14 Significant modern buildings 15 Materials 15 Guidelines 16 TRAFFIC AND VEHICLES 17 Guidelines 17 Other traffic related issues of local concern 18 APPENDIX 19 Consultation of residents Questionnaire July 2005 - Summary of Findings ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1 INTRODUCTION Purpose of the Village Design Statement The Borough Council will continue to work with the residents This Village Design Statement describes the natural and and Parish Council of Old Basing and Lychpit to adopt the man-made features of Old Basing and Lychpit, which its VDS as a supplementary planning document in the future. residents regard as especially distinctive. Location Its purpose is to guide future developments and changes so Old Basing and Lychpit is a large and historic village set in the that they respect and maintain the character and integrity of valley of the River Loddon 5 kilometres east of the town of the village and its community. Basingstoke in northeast Hampshire. A significant part of the settlement lies within the Old Basing Conservation Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Display PDF in Separate
    BLACKWATER RIVER DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN April 1992 NRA National Rivers Authority Thames Region BLACKWATER RIVER CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION DRAFT April 1992 FOREWARD The National Rivers Authority was created in 1989 to conserve and enhance the natural water environment. In our role as 'Guardians of the Water Environment' we are committed to preparing a sound and thorough plan for the future management of the region's river catchments. This Draft Catchment Management Plan is a step towards achieving that goal for the Blackwater River catchment. As a vehicle for consultation it will provide a means of seeking a consensus on the way ahead and as a planning document it will be a means of seeking commitment from all parties to realising the environmental potential of the catchment. » '' I ■ ; We look forward to receiving the contributions of those organisations and individuals involved with the river and its catchment. Les Jones Regional General Manager Kings Meadow House Kings Meadow Road Reading Berks RGl 800 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY II Tel: Reading (0734) 535000 II Telex: 849614 NRATHA G Fax: (0734) 500388 121268 Blackwater Rivet DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN A p r i l 1 9 9 2 National Rivers Authority Thames Region King's Meadow House King's Meadow Road Reading BLACKWATER RIVER DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONTENTS LIST Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The National Rivers Authority 1.1 1.2 Catchment Management Planning 1.2 2.0 CATCHMENT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Introduction 2.1 2.2 General Features 2.2 2.3 Topography 2.4 2.4
    [Show full text]
  • Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
    Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Published in December 2014 RBWM Local Flood Risk Management Strategy December 2014 2 RBWM Local Flood Risk Management Strategy December 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART A: GENERAL INFORMATION .............................................................................................8 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................8 1.1 The Purpose of the Strategy ...........................................................................................8 1.2 Overview of the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead ................................................9 1.3 Types of flooding ....................................................................................................... 11 1.4 Who is this Strategy aimed at? .....................................................................................12 1.5 The period covered by the Strategy ...............................................................................12 1.6 The Objectives of the Strategy ......................................................................................12 1.7 Scrutiny and Review ...................................................................................................13 2 Legislative Context ..........................................................................................................14 2.1 The Pitt Review .........................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Newnham: a History of the Parish and Its Church
    NEWNHAM: A HISTORY OF THE PARISH AND ITS CHURCH SUMMARY Newnham is a long-established community. It dates from well before 1130, which is the earliest written reference. It has some unusual features, for example being built on a ridge away from water. Its church, despite being renovated by the Victorians, yet contains many interesting elements, including a wonderful Norman chancel arch and a carved-in-stone memorial to a priest of the 13th century – comparable to a brass but in this case perhaps unique in Hampshire. Its oldest bell has been ringing over the land since Henry VII was king (1485-1509). It is a charming backwater, aside from the mainstream of headlong 'progress'. A place where the generations have made their contribution and laid their bones – the very essence of rural England. SETTING Newnham, as it exists today, lies on a ridge of high ground above and to the east of the river Lyde. The central feature is The Green enclosed on three sides by a cluster of houses. Here four lanes meet at the crossroads, a fifth leads to the church and a sixth branches away, past the pub. Along these lanes are scattered many dwellings: some very old, others newer. The highest point is the church which stands about 95m or 312 ft above sea level, the Green itself is a little lower. The soil is Plateau Gravel with London Clay preponderating in the surrounding area as it falls away in each direction; immediately along the Lyde the soil is Alluvium (1). The geology to some extent explains the location of the settlement: the plateau gravel lies above a 'saucer' of clay so that rainfall percolates through to the impermeable clay where it is retained; when a well is sunk through the gravel, water is found fairly close to the surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Podolak Multifunctional Riverscapes
    Multifunctional Riverscapes: Stream restoration, Capability Brown’s water features, and artificial whitewater By Kristen Nicole Podolak A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor G. Mathias Kondolf, Chair Professor Louise Mozingo Professor Vincent H. Resh Spring 2012 i Abstract Multifunctional Riverscapes by Kristen Nicole Podolak Doctor of Philosophy in Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning University of California, Berkeley Professor G. Mathias Kondolf, Chair Society is investing in river restoration and urban river revitalization as a solution for sustainable development. Many of these river projects adopt a multifunctional planning and design approach that strives to meld ecological, aesthetic, and recreational functions. However our understanding of how to accomplish multifunctionality and how the different functions work together is incomplete. Numerous ecologically justified river restoration projects may actually be driven by aesthetic and recreational preferences that are largely unexamined. At the same time river projects originally designed for aesthetics or recreation are now attempting to integrate habitat and environmental considerations to make the rivers more sustainable. Through in-depth study of a variety of constructed river landscapes - including dense historical river bend designs, artificial whitewater, and urban stream restoration this dissertation analyzes how aesthetic, ecological, and recreational functions intersect and potentially conflict. To explore how aesthetic and biophysical processes work together in riverscapes, I explored the relationship between one ideal of beauty, an s-curve illustrated by William Hogarth in the 18th century and two sets of river designs: 18th century river designs in England and late 20th century river restoration designs in North America.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Road Drainage and the Water Environment
    HIGHWAYS AGENCY – M4 JUNCTIONS 3 TO 12 SMART MOTORWAY 15 ROAD DRAINAGE AND THE WATER ENVIRONMENT 15.1 Introduction 15.1.1 This chapter assesses the impacts of the Scheme on road drainage and the water environment during construction and operation, focussing on the effects of highway drainage on the quality and hydrology of receiving waters. In view of the long design-life of the Scheme (30 years for new gantries, 40 years for new carriageway construction, and 120 years for new bridges), the decommissioning phase of the Scheme has not been considered in this chapter because its effects are not predicted to be worse than the effects assessed during the construction and operational phases. The chapter assesses four principal impacts: a) effects of routine runoff on surface water bodies; b) effects of routine runoff on groundwater; c) pollution impacts from spillages; and d) flood impacts. 15.1.2 Although Interim Advice Note (”IAN”) 161/13 ‘Managed Motorways, All lane running’ (Ref 15-1) has scoped out the assessment of ‘Road Drainage and the Water Environment’ for smart motorway schemes, the assessment is required to ensure the protection of the water environment, to prevent its degradation, and ensure adequate mitigation measures are in place to prevent any adverse impacts. 15.1.3 The road drainage and water environment assessment for the Scheme has been undertaken in accordance with standard industry practice and statutory guidance. 15.1.4 This chapter details the methodology followed for the assessment, and summarises the regulatory and policy framework relating to road drainage and the water environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Sincs Hampshire.Pdf
    Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) within Hampshire © Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre No part of this documentHBIC may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recoding or otherwise without the prior permission of the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Central Grid SINC Ref District SINC Name Ref. SINC Criteria Area (ha) BD0001 Basingstoke & Deane Straits Copse, St. Mary Bourne SU38905040 1A 2.14 BD0002 Basingstoke & Deane Lee's Wood SU39005080 1A 1.99 BD0003 Basingstoke & Deane Great Wallop Hill Copse SU39005200 1A/1B 21.07 BD0004 Basingstoke & Deane Hackwood Copse SU39504950 1A 11.74 BD0005 Basingstoke & Deane Stokehill Farm Down SU39605130 2A 4.02 BD0006 Basingstoke & Deane Juniper Rough SU39605289 2D 1.16 BD0007 Basingstoke & Deane Leafy Grove Copse SU39685080 1A 1.83 BD0008 Basingstoke & Deane Trinley Wood SU39804900 1A 6.58 BD0009 Basingstoke & Deane East Woodhay Down SU39806040 2A 29.57 BD0010 Basingstoke & Deane Ten Acre Brow (East) SU39965580 1A 0.55 BD0011 Basingstoke & Deane Berries Copse SU40106240 1A 2.93 BD0012 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood North SU40305590 1A 3.63 BD0013 Basingstoke & Deane The Oaks Grassland SU40405920 2A 1.12 BD0014 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood South SU40505520 1B 1.87 BD0015 Basingstoke & Deane West Of Codley Copse SU40505680 2D/6A 0.68 BD0016 Basingstoke & Deane Hitchen Copse SU40505850 1A 13.91 BD0017 Basingstoke & Deane Pilot Hill: Field To The South-East SU40505900 2A/6A 4.62
    [Show full text]
  • Tree Watch Issue 49 May 2021
    Wokingham District Veteran Tree Association Tree Watch Issue 49 May 2021 On 14th May, we had 8,445 trees in our database and 13,074 photographs Welcome to the latest issue of Tree Watch. Why have I featured these lovely carvings here? See page 7. As well as carvings, in this issue we feature native crayfish and (briefly) blue tits. As Alison mentions on page four there are many references to trees in the media these days. As there isn’t space to summarise all of these, I ’ve extended the list of recommended reading and viewing on pages 13 & 14. If you missed the Tree Council’s ‘Plant Health Week: Spring Health Check Webinar’ on 13th May, it was recorded and will hopefully be available soon. We had a very successful “Favourite Tree” evening this month and you’ll see references to some of the presentations in this and future issues; but you can also watch a recording of the whole session. The next issue of Tree Watch will be August 2021 and the copy deadline is 31st July. If you have any comments or responses to anything in this issue or contributions for future issues please send them to: Elaine Butler - datamanager @ wdvta.org.uk Main items in this issue:- (click on title) p2 AGM; WDVTA committee; Events p9 FAQ-Plastic tree guards p3 Tree Watching from my chair p9 The Native Crayfish in Berkshire p5 Remarkable Trees; Acronyms p11 Can we resurrect the English Elm? p6 Winnersh Bridge Trees p12 Species in Focus – Banyan trees p6 The Veteran Tree Survey p13 Sadly departed – MRN 4418 p7 Steve Radford does it again p13 Recommended reading and viewing p8 Trees, Hedgerows, Climate Emergency p15 Did you know? Events – June-August 2021 ❖ No WDVTA events planned until September.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper River Loddon Issues
    Upper Loddon Pressure Issue Location Solution Look at the river valley as a whole, reconnect the floodplain and create/enhance adjacent habitatas fen/wetland etc. Benefits for Biodiversity 2020 targets and flood alleviation d/s. BDBC GI want to work with the EA/catchment host Invasive species Basingstoke Town centre Raise awareness of the problems with the river through the town, would be nice to get water voles and kingfishers back. Coordinate mink control, no gaps – possible role for the host group Basingstoke is a NVZ Pollution incidents Sewage pipes not good enough Beech Hill Point source pollution Pollution from sewage treatment works, Sherfield on Loddon, u/s Pump somewhere else, Kennet? Basingstke, Sherborn St John and Sherfield, contributing to algae and disclorouration. Point source pollutiom Oestrogen from STW Use ferric oxide to remove phosphate, but at max level. But no limits on phosphate limits companies can put into river. Abstraction Over abstraction – low levels Reduce abstraction Sustainable water supply – reservoir, will also provide biodiversity benefits. Maintain flows throughout the river Habitat quality Priory Mill stream is dry most summers Priory Mill Habitat quality Morphology No dredging Flooding Flooding Flooding Perched River Just above Longbridge Mill Reconnect to floodplain Flooding u/s Swallowfield Restore floodplain Habitat quality Trees have reached the end of their Upper Loddon natural life; no longer get help from the EA to maintain. Habitat quality Aesthetic restoration at Festival Place Habitat quality Basing Fen Habitat restoration Habitat quality Walkway from Basingstoke to Barton is overused. Bikes and dogs are a problem. Habitat quality Bow Brook Habitat improvements, bank rehabilitation and gravels.
    [Show full text]
  • GB Electricity System Operator Daily Report Nationalgrideso UNRESTRICTED GB Electricity System Operator Daily Report Tuesday 11 June 2019
    GB Electricity System Operator Daily Report nationalgridESO UNRESTRICTED GB Electricity System Operator Daily Report Tuesday 11 June 2019 Today’s High Level Risk Status Forecast for the next 24h Time General Status Voltage PSM Demand System Inertia 07:00 - 14:00 System Margins Weather Duty 14:00 - 21:00 Generation Transmission Officer 21:00 - 07:00 Active Constraints Today’s Minimum De-Rated Margin 3891.13 (SP 36) System Warnings None Generation Variable Current BMU Largest Loss Risk Demand 560MW Balancing Costs Last 241 hours'6 ENCC11 BM16 spend212631Total:36 £729k414651566166717681869196 £80k £60k £40k £20k £0k -£20k -£40k Yesterday’s Market Summary Cash out price (Max) £80.00 /MWh (SP 20) Cash Out Price (Min) £23.01 /MWh (SP 15) Peak Demand Yesterday 28,745 MW NETS Status Report; 11 June 2019 2 of 4 nationalgridESO UNRESTRICTED Interconnectors Today Import Export Netherlands (BritNed) 1060 1060 Fully Available France (IFA) 1500 1500 Pole 1 unavailable, due to RTS at 12:00hrs Belgium (Nemo) 1013 1013 Fullly Available Ireland (EWIC) 500 530 Fullly Available Northern Ireland (MOYLE) 395 500 Partially available. Wind Power Forecast Key: Expected embedded generation (MWs) Embedded Generation Forecast 10-JUN-2019 11-JUN-2019 12-JUN-2019 05:00 08:00 12:00 17:00 21:00 00:00 05:00 08:00 12:00 17:00 21:00 00:00 05:00 08:00 12:00 17:00 21:00 Solar (MW) 1 1640 3830 1700 46 0 0 1039 3564 2060 29 0 0 725 2193 1717 38 Wind (MW) 284 381 689 1203 1281 1361 1783 2073 2250 2137 1798 1760 1712 1706 1773 1751 1600 STOR (MW) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total (MW) 285 2021 4519 2903 1327 1361 1783 3112 5814 4197 1827 1760 1712 2431 3966 3468 1638 NETS Status Report; 11 June 2019 3 of 4 nationalgridESO UNRESTRICTED Weather Source Commentary 11/05/2019 Met Office Today: (Summary) SEPA Rain, heavy at times, and strong winds will continue across much of Natural Resources Wales England and Wales, although south and southeastern parts will be brighter with lighter winds but with heavy, thundery showers developing.
    [Show full text]