DOCSLIB.ORG

Knife River Study Unit 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Knife River Study Unit 2016 Contents The Knife River Study Unit ................................................................................................ 1 Description of the Knife River Study Unit ..................................................................... 1 Physiography............................................................................................................... 1 Drainage ...................................................................................................................... 5 Climate ........................................................................................................................ 5 Landforms and Soils ................................................................................................... 5 Flora and Fauna........................................................................................................... 6 Other Natural Resource Potential ............................................................................... 6 Overview of Previous Archeological Work .................................................................... 9 Inventory Projects ..................................................................................................... 12 Energy Development and Expansion .................................................................... 20 Coteau Mining .................................................................................................. 20 Coyote Creek Mining ........................................................................................ 21 Pipelines ............................................................................................................ 21 Southwest Pipeline ................................................................................................ 22 Lake Ilo ................................................................................................................. 22 Formal Test Excavation Projects .............................................................................. 22 Energy Development ............................................................................................. 31 Coteau Mining .................................................................................................. 31 Dakota Westmoreland Mining .......................................................................... 32 Lake Ilo ................................................................................................................. 33 Stone Circle and Cairn Sites ..................................................................................... 33 National Register of Historic Places ......................................................................... 34 Major Excavation Projects ........................................................................................ 45 Energy Development and Expansion .................................................................... 48 Mining ............................................................................................................... 48 Lake Ilo ................................................................................................................. 50 Other Work ............................................................................................................... 53 Paleo-Indian Period ....................................................................................................... 56 Paleo-Environmental Modeling ................................................................................ 56 Cultural Chronology ................................................................................................. 56 Settlement Behavior .................................................................................................. 57 Native Subsistence Practices..................................................................................... 57 Technologies ............................................................................................................. 57 Artifact Styles ........................................................................................................... 58 Regional Interaction .................................................................................................. 59 Historic Preservation Goals, Priorities, and Strategies ............................................. 59 Plains Archaic Period .................................................................................................... 59 Paleo-Environmental Modeling ................................................................................ 59 Cultural Chronology ................................................................................................. 60 Settlement Behavior .................................................................................................. 62 Native Subsistence Practices..................................................................................... 63 Artifact Styles ........................................................................................................... 64 Regional Interaction .................................................................................................. 64 Historic Preservation Goals, Priorities, and Strategies ............................................. 64 Plains Woodland Period ................................................................................................ 64 Paleo-Environmental Modeling ................................................................................ 65 Cultural Chronology ................................................................................................. 65 Settlement Behavior .................................................................................................. 65 Native Subsistence Practices..................................................................................... 66 Technologies ............................................................................................................. 66 Artifact Styles ........................................................................................................... 67 Regional Interaction .................................................................................................. 67 Historic Preservation Goals, Priorities, and Strategies ............................................. 68 Plains Village Period..................................................................................................... 68 Paleo-Environmental Modeling ................................................................................ 68 Cultural Chronology ................................................................................................. 68 Settlement Behavior .................................................................................................. 69 Native Subsistence Practices..................................................................................... 69 Technologies ............................................................................................................. 69 Artifact Styles ........................................................................................................... 69 Regional Interaction .................................................................................................. 70 Historic Preservation Goals, Priorities, and Strategies ............................................. 70 Equestrian/Fur Trade Period ......................................................................................... 70 Paleo-Environmental Modeling ................................................................................ 71 Cultural Chronology ................................................................................................. 71 Settlement Behavior .................................................................................................. 71 Native Subsistence Practices..................................................................................... 71 Technologies ............................................................................................................. 71 Artifact Styles ........................................................................................................... 72 Regional Interaction .................................................................................................. 72 Historic Preservation Goals, Priorities, and Strategies ............................................. 72 The Knife River Study Unit Michael L. Gregg and Amy C. Bleier 2016 The Knife River Study Unit (KRSU) has the greatest density of prehistoric sites in the state because the primary source area for Knife River flint (KRF) is here. Settlements with activity areas partially or entirely devoted to the procurement and initial processing of KRF abound in the area. Additionally, the Knife River basin was used heavily for hunting and gathering wild plant foods and other materials by large populations of Plains Village peoples whose residential bases were concentrated along the Missouri River immediately to the east. Also, paralleling other southwestern North Dakota drainages, most of the KRSU has been free of glacial ice and open for exploitation throughout all of prehistory. It has surely witnessed at least intermittent human occupation since people first came to the Northern Plains, and reports of Clovis point surface finds seem to affirm that. Description of the Knife River Study Unit The
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Visualizing Paleoindian and Archaic Mobility in the Ohio
    VISUALIZING PALEOINDIAN AND ARCHAIC MOBILITY IN THE OHIO REGION OF EASTERN NORTH AMERICA A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Amanda N. Colucci May 2017 ©Copyright All rights reserved Except for previously published materials Dissertation written by Amanda N. Colucci B.A., Western State Colorado University, 2007 M.A., Kent State University, 2009 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2017 Approved by Dr. Mandy Munro-Stasiuk, Ph.D., Co-Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Mark Seeman, Ph.D., Co-Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Eric Shook, Ph.D., Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. James Tyner, Ph.D. Dr. Richard Meindl, Ph.D. Dr. Alison Smith, Ph.D. Accepted by Dr. Scott Sheridan, Ph.D., Chair, Department of Geography Dr. James Blank, Ph.D., Dean, College of Arts and Sciences TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ……………………………………………………………………………..……...……. III LIST OF FIGURES ….………………………………………......………………………………..…….…..………iv LIST OF TABLES ……………………………………………………………….……………..……………………x ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..………………………….……………………………..…………….………..………xi CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 STUDY AREA AND TIMEFRAME ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.1.1 Paleoindian Period ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Weekly Lists for 1992
    United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE P.O. BOX 37127 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20013-7127 IN aEPLy a£F£K TO: The Director of the Natlonal Park service is pleased to Inform you that the fol lowing properties have been entered In the National Register of Historic Places. For further Information cal I 202/343-9542. JAN 3 1992 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 12/23/91 THROJc:>1 12/27/91 KEY: state. county, ProPerty Name. Address/soundary, City, vicinity, Reference Nuntier N-IL status. Action, Date, MUitipie Name ARIZONA. c.ocoNINO co..NTY. Fjrst Baptist church, 123 s. Beaver St .• Flagstaff. 91001576, IIOMINATION, 12/23/91 ARIZONA, COCONINO COl.NTY. Pendley Homestead Historic District. us 89-A, 7 ml.Nor Sedona. Sedona vicinity, 91001857, NOMINATION, 12/23/91 CALIFORNIA, ALAMEDA COlNTY, The Bellevue-Staten. 492 Staten Ave .. 0akland. 91001896, NOMINATION. 12/27/91 CALIFORNIA, ORANOE CQU,ITY, Casa Romantica. 415 Avenlda cranada, San Clemente. 91001900. NOMINATION, 12/27/91 COLORADO, MONTEZUMA CQU,ITY, Mancos High school, 350 crand AVe., Mancos. 91001740. NOMINATION, 12/23/91 IDAHO. CARIBCX.J cou,rry_ Largllliere, Edgar waiter sr. HOuse. 30 west second south st .• soda Springs. 91001870. NOMINATION. 12/23/91 INDIANA, MARION oou,rTY. St. Clair. 109 w. ~t. Clair St., Indianapolis, 83000085. REMOVAL. 12/04/91 (Apartments and Flats of oowntown Indianapolis TR) IOWA. ALLAMAKEE cou,rry, Lans jng Fisher les Bui !ding. Between co. HWy. X-52 and the Miss lss lppi R.. south uns ing. Lans Ing, 91001832. NOMINATION, 12/23/91 <conservation Movement in 1owa MPS) IOWA.
    [Show full text]
  • Megaliths and the Early Mezcala Urban Tradition of Mexico
    ICDIGITAL Separata 44-45/5 ALMOGAREN 44-45/2013-2014MM131 ICDIGITAL Eine PDF-Serie des Institutum Canarium herausgegeben von Hans-Joachim Ulbrich Technische Hinweise für den Leser: Die vorliegende Datei ist die digitale Version eines im Jahrbuch "Almogaren" ge- druckten Aufsatzes. Aus technischen Gründen konnte – nur bei Aufsätzen vor 1990 – der originale Zeilenfall nicht beibehalten werden. Das bedeutet, dass Zeilen- nummern hier nicht unbedingt jenen im Original entsprechen. Nach wie vor un- verändert ist jedoch der Text pro Seite, so dass Zitate von Textstellen in der ge- druckten wie in der digitalen Version identisch sind, d.h. gleiche Seitenzahlen (Pa- ginierung) aufweisen. Der im Aufsatzkopf erwähnte Erscheinungsort kann vom Sitz der Gesellschaft abweichen, wenn die Publikation nicht im Selbstverlag er- schienen ist (z.B. Vereinssitz = Hallein, Verlagsort = Graz wie bei Almogaren III). Die deutsche Rechtschreibung wurde – mit Ausnahme von Literaturzitaten – den aktuellen Regeln angepasst. Englischsprachige Keywords wurden zum Teil nach- träglich ergänzt. PDF-Dokumente des IC lassen sich mit dem kostenlosen Adobe Acrobat Reader (Version 7.0 oder höher) lesen. Für den Inhalt der Aufsätze sind allein die Autoren verantwortlich. Dunkelrot gefärbter Text kennzeichnet spätere Einfügungen der Redaktion. Alle Vervielfältigungs- und Medien-Rechte dieses Beitrags liegen beim Institutum Canarium Hauslabgasse 31/6 A-1050 Wien IC-Separatas werden für den privaten bzw. wissenschaftlichen Bereich kostenlos zur Verfügung gestellt. Digitale oder gedruckte Kopien von diesen PDFs herzu- stellen und gegen Gebühr zu verbreiten, ist jedoch strengstens untersagt und be- deutet eine schwerwiegende Verletzung der Urheberrechte. Weitere Informationen und Kontaktmöglichkeiten: institutum-canarium.org almogaren.org Abbildung Titelseite: Original-Umschlag des gedruckten Jahrbuches.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Artifact Found on San Clemente Island Mass Communication Specialist 2Nd Class Shawnte Bryan July 16, 2013 (U.S
    Santa Cruz Archaeological Society Newsletter Rare Artifact Found on San Clemente Island Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Shawnte Bryan July 16, 2013 (U.S. Navy Story Number: NNS130716-29) The Navy discovered a significant prehistoric artifact 90 miles west of San Diego on San Clemente Island (SCI) located mid-island at a newly discovered archeological site. A boat effigy made of submarine volcano lava was spotted at the surface of the site during an archeology survey. The boat effigy represents a type of boat used by the California Indians who occupied the California Channels and adjacent southern California mainland at the time of the Spanish "discovery" in the AD 1500s. Dr. Andy Yatsko, Senior Archaeologist and Region Southwest Archaeologist for the Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest in San Diego, who has over 40 years experience in prehistoric and historic archaeology finds the boat effigy to be an uncommon find. "Boat effigies like the one found are exceedingly rare in the archaeological record, with this being my first one recovered during my 30 year tenure with SCI," said Dr. Yatsko [image courtesy U.S. Navy]. "Finding artifacts on the surface of archaeological sites at the island is not unusual, but a rare one like this is always exciting to come across." The effigy was created from submarine volcano lava. This lava differs from the lava that flows on the mainland because the vesicles are smaller, making it more brittle and more difficult to handle. “The vesicle volcanic material used is hard and brittle but somehow they were able to craft a fine little carving out of it to represent an important part of their culture," said Yatsko.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontier History of Coshocton
    Frontier History of Coshocton By Scott E. Butler, Ph. D. Frontier History of Coshocton First printing 2020 Library of Congress Control Number: 2020915741 Copyright 2020 Scott E. Butler Copyright of photographs, maps and illustrations remains with persons or institutions credited. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-0-578-75019-4 Printed by Carlisle Printing Sugarcreek, Ohio Cover art is a digital photo of an oil-on-canvas painting by the author’s father, Dr. John G. Butler, a veterinarian in Coshocton for many years. He enjoyed painting animals. Manufactured in the United States of America on acid-free paper. Open Your Eyes and Ears and Clear Your Mind and Listen to What I Have to Say – Adapted from customary opening words of northeast Native American conferences among tribes and nations and with white people in the 18th Century. Dedicated to the people of Coshocton, that present and future generations may know the truth about the grand history of their place in the world. Contents Page # Preface i Acknowledgements ii Illustrations iii Maps iv Terminology v Sources vi Chapter Page # 1. Introduction & the Pre-European Era 1 2. Mary Harris 21 3. Early Habitation of Ohio after 1701 40 4. The Conflict Begins 56 5. The War Years in Ohio 66 6. Recovery in Coshoctonia 78 7. Delaware Survival in Coshoctonia 107 8. Delaware Revival in Coshoctonia 118 9. Conversions and Conflicts 133 10. Coshoctonia on January 1, 1775 168 11. Resolution and Revolution 178 12. Lichtenau & New Leaders 197 13. Peace and War 209 14. Alliance and Breakdown 234 15. Fort Laurens 253 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Archeological and Bioarcheological Resources of the Northern Plains Edited by George C
    Tri-Services Cultural Resources Research Center USACERL Special Report 97/2 December 1996 U.S. Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Construction Engineering Research Laboratory Archeological and Bioarcheological Resources of the Northern Plains edited by George C. Frison and Robert C. Mainfort, with contributions by George C. Frison, Dennis L. Toom, Michael L. Gregg, John Williams, Laura L. Scheiber, George W. Gill, James C. Miller, Julie E. Francis, Robert C. Mainfort, David Schwab, L. Adrien Hannus, Peter Winham, David Walter, David Meyer, Paul R. Picha, and David G. Stanley A Volume in the Central and Northern Plains Archeological Overview Arkansas Archeological Survey Research Series No. 47 1996 Arkansas Archeological Survey Fayetteville, Arkansas 1996 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Archeological and bioarcheological resources of the Northern Plains/ edited by George C. Frison and Robert C. Mainfort; with contributions by George C. Frison [et al.] p. cm. — (Arkansas Archeological Survey research series; no. 47 (USACERL special report; 97/2) “A volume in the Central and Northern Plains archeological overview.” Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-56349-078-1 (alk. paper) 1. Indians of North America—Great Plains—Antiquities. 2. Indians of North America—Anthropometry—Great Plains. 3. Great Plains—Antiquities. I. Frison, George C. II. Mainfort, Robert C. III. Arkansas Archeological Survey. IV. Series. V. Series: USA-CERL special report: N-97/2. E78.G73A74 1996 96-44361 978’.01—dc21 CIP Abstract The 12,000 years of human occupation in the Northwestern Great Plains states of Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, and South Dakota is reviewed here.
    [Show full text]
  • Rock Art Studies: a Bibliographic Database Page 1 800 Citations: Compiled by Leigh Marymor 04/12/17
    Rock Art Studies: A Bibliographic Database Page 1 800 Citations: Compiled by Leigh Marymor 04/12/17 Keywords: Peterborough, Canada. North America. Cultural Adams, Amanda Shea resource management. Conservation and preservation. 2003 Reprinted from "Measurement in Physical Geography", Visions Cast on Stone: A Stylistic Analysis of the Occasional Paper No. 3, Dept. of Geography, Trent Petroglyphs of Gabriola Island, BCMaster/s Thesis :79 pgs, University, 1974. Weathering. University of British Columbia. Cited from: LMRAA, WELLM, BCSRA. Keywords: Gabriola Island, British Columbia, Canada. North America. Stylistic analysis. Marpole Culture. Vision. Alberta Recreation and Parks Abstract: "This study explores the stylistic variability and n.d. underlying cohesion of the petroglyphs sites located on Writing-On-Stone Provincial ParkTourist Brochure, Alberta Gabriola Island, British Columbia, a southern Gulf Island in Recreation and Parks. the Gulf of Georgia region of the Northwest Coast (North America). I view the petroglyphs as an inter-related body of Keywords: WRITING-ON-STONE PROVINCIAL PARK, ancient imagery and deliberately move away from (historical ALBERTA, CANADA. North America. "THE BATTLE and widespread) attempts at large regional syntheses of 'rock SCENE" PETROGLYPH SITE INSERT INCLUDED WITH art' and towards a study of smaller and more precise PAMPHLET. proportion. In this thesis, I propose that the majority of petroglyphs located on Gabriola Island were made in a short Cited from: RCSL. period of time, perhaps over the course of a single life (if a single, prolific specialist were responsible for most of the Allen, W.A. imagery) or, at most, over the course of a few generations 2007 (maybe a family of trained carvers).
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoindian Mobility Ranges Predicted by the Distribution of Projectile Points Made of Upper Mercer and Flint Ridge Flint
    Paleoindian Mobility Ranges Predicted by the Distribution of Projectile Points Made of Upper Mercer and Flint Ridge Flint A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts by Amanda Nicole Mullett December, 2009 Thesis written by Amanda Nicole Mullett B.A. Western State College, 2007 M.A. Kent State University, 2009 Approved by _____________________________, Advisor Dr. Mark F. Seeman _____________________________, Chair, Department of Anthropology Dr. Richard Meindl _____________________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Dr. Timothy Moerland ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ............................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... v List of Appendices .................................................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... vi Chapter I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 II. Background ...................................................................................................................5 The Environment.............................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Ecological Analysis of Paleoindian and Archaic Subsistence and Landscape Use in Central Tennessee
    From Colonization to Domestication: A Historical Ecological Analysis of Paleoindian and Archaic Subsistence and Landscape Use in Central Tennessee Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Miller, Darcy Shane Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 28/09/2021 09:33:21 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/320030 From Colonization to Domestication: A Historical Ecological Analysis of Paleoindian and Archaic Subsistence and Landscape Use in Central Tennessee by Darcy Shane Miller __________________________ Copyright © Darcy Shane Miller 2014 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the SCHOOL OF ANTHROPOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2014 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Darcy Shane Miller, titled From Colonization to Domestication: A Historical Ecological Analysis of Paleoindian and Archaic Subsistence and Landscape Use in Central Tennessee and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _______________________________________________________________________ Date: (4/29/14) Vance T. Holliday _______________________________________________________________________ Date: (4/29/14) Steven L. Kuhn _______________________________________________________________________ Date: (4/29/14) Mary C. Stiner _______________________________________________________________________ Date: (4/29/14) David G. Anderson Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Site Inventory (ASI) Form
    WISCONSIN ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE INVENTORY FORM (PAPER-27 NOV 2001-FINAL PO 10 JAN 2002) CODE # 47- COUNTY FIELD # Name (limit 25 characters) Other Name LOCATIONAL INFORMATION (See Appendix B) Civil Town(s) Town# N, Range# E or W, Section# Quarter-sections (minimum 3) Quarter-section Grid Alignment (edge and corner) USGS Quad (7.5) Other Legal Descriptions ❒ French Lot ❒ Gov. Lot ADDITIONAL TRS DATA (IF APPROPRIATE) Civil Town Town# N, Range# E or W, Section# Quarter-sections (minimum 3) Quarter-section Grid Alignment (edge and corner) USGS Quad (7.5) Other Legal Descriptions: ❒ French Lot ❒ Gov. Lot UTM Coordinates: ❒ Zone ❒ Easting ❒ Northing Method: ❒ Interpolated from USGS Quad ❒ GPS Field GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION & RELATIONSHIP TO LANDSCAPE FEATURES SITE DESCRIPTION INFORMATION SITE/FEATURE DESCRIPTION SITE TYPE(S) (Check all that apply. See Appendix D for definitions .) ❒ Cabin/homestead ❒ Cache/pit/hearth ❒ Campsite/village ❒ Cave/rockshelter ❒ CCC/WPA site ❒ Cemetery/burials ❒ Church ❒ Corn hills/garden beds ❒ Cultural Site ❒ Dam/historic earthwork ❒ Dock/pier/crib ❒ Enclosure/earthworks ❒ Experimental ❒ Farmstead ❒ Fish weir/trap ❒ Foundation/depressions ❒ HCM concentration ❒ Ice House ❒ Isolated find ❒ Kill site/bone bed ❒ Kiln ❒ Lithic scatter ❒ Logging camps ❒ Military site ❒ Mill/sawmill ❒ Mound(s)-conical ❒ Mound(s)-effigy ❒ Mound(s)- linear ❒ Mound(s)-other ❒ Paleontological ❒ Quarry/mine ❒ Redeposited artifacts ❒ Rock art ❒ Rock feature/petroform ❒ School ❒ Shell midden ❒ Shipwreck ❒ Sugarbush ❒ Tower ❒ Trading/fur post ❒ Traditional Cultural Property ❒ Transportation site ❒ Workshop site ❒ Unknown ❒ Other: FOR WHS OFFICE USE: ❒ CHK’D ❒ GIS ❒ GIS CHK’D ❒ ENTER ❒ ENTRY CHK’D ❒ ASI# HP-06-02P (rev. 09/2002) CULTURAL AFFILIATION (Check all that apply. Using certainty of affiliation: 1= definite, 2= probable, 3= possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Schematic of God
    The Schematic of God For The First Time An Extraordinary Journey Into Humanity’s Nonphysical Roots Warning! Reading this material may change your reality. William Dayholos January/2007 © E –mail address: [email protected] ISBN: 978-1-4251-2303-1 Paperback copy can be ordered from Trafford Publishing – www.trafford.com Illustrations by Wm. Dayholos ©Copyright 2007 William Dayholos II Acknowledgments The value of ones existences can always be measured by the support they receive from others. Be it family or not it is still unselfish support for another human being who is asking for help. Thank you Rose Dayholos, Marjory Marciski, Irene Sulik, Grace Single, Janice Abstreiter, and Robert Regnier for your editing help. This book is dedicated to my partner in life. To me a partner is one whom you can share your ideas with, one who can be trusted not to patronize these ideas, one who can differentiate their own truth from yours. A person who has an equal spiritual level and understanding, and encourages only through support of your ideas and not to through expectation. A true partner is one who balances out any weaknesses you have in the same fashion as you do for them. One’s weakness is the other’s strength, together you create a whole, a relationship that is stronger than the individuals themselves. In true fashion my partner has both helped and supported this book’s creation. Without this partner’s help it might have run the risk of being too much “me”! This was never the reason for the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Historic Preservation Plan Was Written in 2009
    NORTH DAKOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF NORTH DAKOTA 612 EAST BOULEVARD AVENUE BISMARCK, NORTH DAKOTA 58505-0830 PRESERVATION IN NORTH DAKOTA, 2016-2021: A Statewide Comprehensive Plan PRESERVATION IN NORTH DAKOTA, 2016-2021: Telephone: (701) 328-2672 FAX: (701) 328-3710 http://history.nd.gov HISTORIC December 2015 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: The preparation of this plan revision was a group effort. Research, discussion, writing and reviews were performed primarily by the staff of the State Historic Preservation Office, sitting as an ad hoc planning committee and by other individuals from the staff of the State Historical Society of North Dakota, each bringing his or her own perspective, expertise, experience and philosophical viewpoints, to help formulate a comprehensive yet balanced preservation concept. Preservation constituents and respondents from the general public gave time and generously contributed ideas, evaluations, suggestions, concerns, and assessments. To each and all of these sincere gratitude is offered, as it is to previous staff and public participants whose contributions to earlier planning studies and efforts were of great value to the development of this plan. This document may be provided in other communication formats. If special format copies are desired, please contact: The Division of Archaeology and Historic Preservation State Historical Society of North Dakota 612 East Boulevard Avenue Bismarck, North Dakota 58505 Telephone: (701) 328-2672 Fax: (701) 328-3710 http://history.nd.gov The State Historical Society of North Dakota receives federal funds from the U. S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, to assist with costs of administering the Historic Preservation program in this state.
    [Show full text]