Phylogeny and Zoogeography of Glyptocephalines (Pisces: Pleuronectidae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Phylogeny and Zoogeography of Glyptocephalines (Pisces: Pleuronectidae) AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Tai-sheng Chiufor the degree of _Doctor of Philosophyin Fisheries presented on July 10, 1987 Title: Phylogeny and Zoogeographyof Glyptocephalines (Pisces: Pleuronectidae) Abstract approved: Redacted for Privacy Douglas F. Markle Hypotheses of phylogenetic and historicalzoogeographic relationships of glyptocephalines (Glyptocephaluscynoglossus, G. zachirus, G. stelleri, Microstoinuskitt, H. pacificus, H. achne, Embassichthys bathybius, and Tanakius kitaharae)were constructed based on comparative anatomy andexternal morphology. The phylogenetic approachwas cladistic and character polaritywas determined by using out-groupcomparison.One nominal in-group, Platichthys bicoloratus, isshom to be a derived out-grouptaxon. Two other out-group taxa usedare Parophrys vetulus and Atheresthes stoinias. Monophyly of glyptocephalinesis suggested by the resultsof minimum distance clustering ofshape, as well as asymmetricaljaw dentition and mi-serial arrangementof jaw teeth; loss of ural neural arch; median numberof rays on fifth hypuralgreater than two; and median number of parhypural rays greater thanthree. Two monophyletic groups are identifiedwithin glyptocephalines: CladeN, Ernbassichthys and Microstomus;and Clade G, Tanakiusand Glyptocephalus. Each dade includes a primitive monotypic genus and a derived genus with three species. The most recent speciation event in each dade separated an Atlantic species from a western Pacific species. One trans-Pacific dispersal event is hypothesized for the ancestor of Clade G and one recent trans-Arctic dispersal is hypothesized for both clades. The trans-Pacific dispersal probably occurred during the Miocene. The trans-Arctic dispersal probably occurred during the Pliocene. The western North Pacific or North Pacific is the most likely the center of origin of glyptocephalines, since this area possesses the most primitive taxa. Some ontogenetic data are discussed to corroborate glyptocephaline monophyly and phylogenetic relationships. Relative timing of ontogenetic events and ontogenetic shape changes corroborate generic groupings. A more thorough study of ontogenetic biornetry may shed light on the robustness of glyptocephaline phylogeny. In addition, the specialized giant larvae of eastern North Pacific glyptocephalines deserves further study of ecologic and ontogenetic interactions. Phylogeny and Zoogeography of Glyptocephalines (Pisces: Pleuronectidae) by Tai-sheng Chiu A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Completed July 10, 1987 Commencement June 1988 APPROVED: Redacted for Privacy Associate Professor of Fisheries and Wildlife in charge of major Redacted for Privacy Head of Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Redacted for Privacy Dean of Gr School Date thesis is presented July 10, 1987 Typed by Tai-sheng Chiu for Tai-sheng Chiu ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the members of my graduate committee, Dr. Arthur Boucot, Dr. Bruce Coblentz, Dr. Alvin Smith, and Dr. David Thomas, for their comments and criticisms on the manuscript. I am truly appreciative of my major professor Dr. Douglas i4arkle for his assistance and encouragement, and his extraordinary patience during the weekly discussions of the last six months and his extraordinarily rapid review during the last days. I am grateful to the following persons and their institutions for loans and gifts of material used in this study: Mr. J.R. Dunn, Northwest and Alaska Fisheries Center; Mr. K.E. Hartel, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University; Mrs. G. Haynes, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ngland; Mr. S.L. Jewett and Mr. L.P. Norrod, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution; Mr. S.L. Leipertz, University of Washington; Drs. D.E. McAllister and B.W. Coad, National Museum of Canada; Dr. H.G. Moser, Southwest Fisheries Center, National Marine Fisheries Service; Dr. J. Nielsen, Zoologisk Museum, University of Copenhagen; Drs. K. Sulak and L.V. Guelpen, Atlantic Reference Centre; Dr. J.A. Seigel, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County; Dr. A. Wheeler, British Museum (Natural History); Dr. K. Amaoka, Hokkaido University; Dr. D. Kitagawa, Iwate Prefectural Fisheries Experimental Station; Dr. K. Matsuura, National Science Museum; and Dr. T. Nakabo, Kyoto University. I would also like to thank the many scholars who provided much specimen information. I am grateful for the two-year financial support from the National Science Council and National Taiwan University, Taiwan, Republic of China. Finally, I would like to recognize and laud my wife, Yuh-chen Chern, for her oriental virtue and endurance. She took care of everything in Taiwan while I was abroad. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 1. Phylogenetic history 1 2. Zoogeographic considerations 7 3. Objectives 8 MATERIALS AND METHODS 9 1. Materials 9 2. Methods 9 A. Comparative anatomy 9 B. Biometry 10 C. Phylogenetic and zoogeographic cladograrn 18 3. Terminology 18 COMPARATIVE ANATOMY 22 1.Jaw apparatus 22 2. Gill arches 34 3.Secondary body cavity and intestinal tract 60 4.Vertical fins 67 5.Pectoral girdle 71 6. Pelvic girdle 85 7.Caudal fin 86 8.Vertebral column 98 BIOMETRY 112 1. Meristic character 112 2. Morphometric character 116 A. Range of events 116 B. Ontogenetic sequence 133 C. Inter-specific comparison 162 PHYLOGENETIC CLADOGRAM 192 1. Coding of characters 192 2. Phylogenetic cladogram 197 3. Corroboration 210 ZOOGEOGRPLPHIC CLADOGRAM 219 1. Distribution 219 2. Zoogeographic cladograin 225 3. Zoogeographic scenario 229 BIBLIOGRAPHY 266 APPENDIX 276 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Relationship of glyptocephalines based on interpretation of Norman (1934). 5 2. Relationship of glyptocephalines based on interpretation of Richardson (1981). 5 3. Relationships of glyptocephalines proposed by Sakamoto (1984, Fig. 51). The names follow Norman (1934). The names in parenthesis are generic names proposed by Sakamoto (1984). P. is composed of Pleuronectus and other taxa. A. is composed of Atheresthes and other taxa. Similarity scales has been omitted. 5 4. The set of morphological landmarks used to quantify general shape. 14 5. Lateral view of jaw apparatus of: A) G. cynoglossus, ARC 8601037, 100 mm; B) G. zachirus, OS uncatalogued, 79 mm; and C) G. stelleri, OS 11272, 172 mm. Left denotes right side upper and lower jaws and right denotes left side upper and lower jaws). 24 6. Lateral view of jaw apparatus of: A) N. kitt, OS 1805, 162 mm; B) N. pacificus, OS 3181, 117 mm; and C) N. achne, OS 11270, 167 mm. Left denotes right side upper and lower jaws and right denotes left side upper and lower jaws). 26 7. Lateral view of jaw apparatus of: A) E. bathybius, OS 7493, 197 mm; B) P. kitaharae, UW 21194, 160 mm; and C) P. bicoloratus, OS 11271 032, 111 mm. Left denotes right side upper and lower jaws and right denotes left side upper and lower jaws). 28 8. Lateral view of jaw apparatus of: A) P. vetulus, OS 5908, 59 mm; B) A. stomias, OS 3906, 98 mm. Left denotes right side upper and lower jaws and right denotes left side upper and lower jaws). 30 9. Three schematic types of tooth. 30 10. Right dorsal gill arches and pharyngobranchial teeth of G. cynoglossus, ARC 8601037, 100 mm. Right denotes dorsal view of right side gill arch and left denotes ventral view of pharyngobranchial tooth plate. 35 List of Figures (Con't) Figure Page 11. Right dorsal gill arches and pharyngobranchial teeth of 0. zachirus, OS uncatalogued, 79 mm. Right denotes dorsal view of right side gill arch and left denotes ventral view of pharyngobranchial tooth plate. 37 12. Right dorsal gill arches and pharyngobranchial teeth of 0. stelleri, OS 11272, 172 mm. Right denotes dorsal view of right side gill arch and left denotes ventral view of pharyngobranchial tooth plate. 39 13. Right dorsal gill arches and pharyngobranchial teeth of N. kitt, OS 1805, 162 mm. Right denotes dorsal view of right side gill arch and left denotes ventral view of pharyngobranchial tooth plate. 41 14. Right dorsal gill arches and pharyngobranchial teeth of N. pacificus, OS 3181, 117 mm. Right denotes dorsal view of right side gill arch and left denotes ventral view of pharyngobranchial tooth plate. 43 15. Right dorsal gill arches and pharyngobranchial teeth of M. achne, OS 11270, 167 mm. Right denotes dorsal view of right side gill arch and left denotes ventral view of pharyngobranchial tooth plate. 45 16. Right dorsal gill arches and pharyngobranchial teeth of E. bathybius, OS 7493, 197 mm. Right denotes dorsal view of right side gill arch and left denotes ventral view of pharyngobranchial tooth plate. 47 17. Right dorsal gill arches and pharyngobranchial teeth of T. kitaharae, TJW 21194, 160 mm. Right denotes dorsal view of right side gill arch and left denotes ventral view of pharyngobranchial tooth plate. 49 18. Right dorsal gill arches and pharyngobranchial teeth of P. bicoloratus, OS 11271, 111 mm. Right denotes dorsal view of right side gill arch and left denotes ventral view of pharyngobranchial tooth plate. 51 19. Right dorsal gill arches and pharyngobranchial teeth of P. vetulus, 05 5908, 59 mm. Right denotes dorsal view of right side gill arch and left denotes ventral view of pharyngobranchial tooth plate. 53 List of Figures (Con't) Figure Page 20. Right dorsal gill arches and pharyngobranchial teeth of A. stomias, OS 3906, 98 mm. Right denotes dorsal view of right side gill arch and left denotes ventral view of pharyngobranchial tooth plate. 55 21. Intestinal tract: A) G. cynoglossus, B) G. zachirus, C) G. stelleri, D) M. kitt. 61 22. Intestinal tract: A) N. pacificus, B) N. achne, C) E. bathybius, D) T. kitaharae. 63 23. Intestinal tract: A) P. bicoloratus, B) P. vetulus, C) A. stomias. 65 24. A) Structure of the first 5 elements of the dorsal fin. B) Structure of the anal fin elements between the first pterygiophore and first haemal spine. C) Structure of the right pelvic fin. 69 25. Lateral view of pectoral girdle of: A) G. cynoglossus, ARC 8601037, 100 mm; B) G. zachirus, OS uncatalogued, 79 mm; and C) G.
Recommended publications
  • Preliminary Mass-Balance Food Web Model of the Eastern Chukchi Sea
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-AFSC-262 Preliminary Mass-balance Food Web Model of the Eastern Chukchi Sea by G. A. Whitehouse U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Alaska Fisheries Science Center December 2013 NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS The National Marine Fisheries Service's Alaska Fisheries Science Center uses the NOAA Technical Memorandum series to issue informal scientific and technical publications when complete formal review and editorial processing are not appropriate or feasible. Documents within this series reflect sound professional work and may be referenced in the formal scientific and technical literature. The NMFS-AFSC Technical Memorandum series of the Alaska Fisheries Science Center continues the NMFS-F/NWC series established in 1970 by the Northwest Fisheries Center. The NMFS-NWFSC series is currently used by the Northwest Fisheries Science Center. This document should be cited as follows: Whitehouse, G. A. 2013. A preliminary mass-balance food web model of the eastern Chukchi Sea. U.S. Dep. Commer., NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-AFSC-262, 162 p. Reference in this document to trade names does not imply endorsement by the National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-AFSC-262 Preliminary Mass-balance Food Web Model of the Eastern Chukchi Sea by G. A. Whitehouse1,2 1Alaska Fisheries Science Center 7600 Sand Point Way N.E. Seattle WA 98115 2Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean University of Washington Box 354925 Seattle WA 98195 www.afsc.noaa.gov U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Penny. S. Pritzker, Secretary National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Kathryn D.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Larvae of Three Arctic Species of Limanda (Family Pleuronectidae)
    Identification of larvae of three arctic species of Limanda (Family Pleuronectidae) Morgan S. Busby, Deborah M. Blood & Ann C. Matarese Polar Biology ISSN 0722-4060 Polar Biol DOI 10.1007/s00300-017-2153-9 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by 2017. This e- offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self-archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy Polar Biol DOI 10.1007/s00300-017-2153-9 ORIGINAL PAPER Identification of larvae of three arctic species of Limanda (Family Pleuronectidae) 1 1 1 Morgan S. Busby • Deborah M. Blood • Ann C. Matarese Received: 28 September 2016 / Revised: 26 June 2017 / Accepted: 27 June 2017 Ó Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 Abstract Identification of fish larvae in Arctic marine for L. proboscidea in comparison to the other two species waters is problematic as descriptions of early-life-history provide additional evidence suggesting the genus Limanda stages exist for few species. Our goal in this study is to may be paraphyletic, as has been proposed in other studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Pleuronectidae
    FAMILY Pleuronectidae Rafinesque, 1815 - righteye flounders [=Heterosomes, Pleronetti, Pleuronectia, Diplochiria, Poissons plats, Leptosomata, Diprosopa, Asymmetrici, Platessoideae, Hippoglossoidinae, Psettichthyini, Isopsettini] Notes: Hétérosomes Duméril, 1805:132 [ref. 1151] (family) ? Pleuronectes [latinized to Heterosomi by Jarocki 1822:133, 284 [ref. 4984]; no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Pleronetti Rafinesque, 1810b:14 [ref. 3595] (ordine) ? Pleuronectes [published not in latinized form before 1900; not available, Article 11.7.2] Pleuronectia Rafinesque, 1815:83 [ref. 3584] (family) Pleuronectes [senior objective synonym of Platessoideae Richardson, 1836; family name sometimes seen as Pleuronectiidae] Diplochiria Rafinesque, 1815:83 [ref. 3584] (subfamily) ? Pleuronectes [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Poissons plats Cuvier, 1816:218 [ref. 993] (family) Pleuronectes [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Leptosomata Goldfuss, 1820:VIII, 72 [ref. 1829] (family) ? Pleuronectes [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Diprosopa Latreille, 1825:126 [ref. 31889] (family) Platessa [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Asymmetrici Minding, 1832:VI, 89 [ref. 3022] (family) ? Pleuronectes [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Platessoideae Richardson, 1836:255 [ref. 3731] (family) Platessa [junior objective synonym of Pleuronectia Rafinesque, 1815, invalid, Article 61.3.2 Hippoglossoidinae Cooper & Chapleau, 1998:696, 706 [ref. 26711] (subfamily) Hippoglossoides Psettichthyini Cooper & Chapleau, 1998:708 [ref. 26711] (tribe) Psettichthys Isopsettini Cooper & Chapleau, 1998:709 [ref. 26711] (tribe) Isopsetta SUBFAMILY Atheresthinae Vinnikov et al., 2018 - righteye flounders GENUS Atheresthes Jordan & Gilbert, 1880 - righteye flounders [=Atheresthes Jordan [D.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Flounder
    Maine 2015 Wildlife Action Plan Revision Report Date: January 13, 2016 Pseudopleuronectes americanus (Winter Flounder) Priority 2 Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) Class: Actinopterygii (Ray-finned Fishes) Order: Pleuronectiformes (Flatfish) Family: Pleuronectidae (Righteye Flounders) General comments: Maine DMR jurisdiction; W Atlantic specialist = LB-GA No Species Conservation Range Maps Available for Winter Flounder SGCN Priority Ranking - Designation Criteria: Risk of Extirpation: NA State Special Concern or NMFS Species of Concern: NA Recent Significant Declines: Winter Flounder is currently undergoing steep population declines, which has already led to, or if unchecked is likely to lead to, local extinction and/or range contraction. Notes: ASMFC Stock Assess, 30yr, and DFO. 2012. Assessment of winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence (NAFO Div. 4T). DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Sci. Advis. Rep. 2012/016. Regional Endemic: NA High Regional Conservation Priority: Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission Stock Assessments: Status: Unstable/Decreasing, Status Comment: Reference: High Climate Change Vulnerability: NA Understudied rare taxa: NA Historical: NA Culturally Significant: NA Habitats Assigned to Winter Flounder: Formation Name Subtidal Macrogroup Name Subtidal Coarse Gravel Bottom Habitat System Name: Coarse Gravel **Primary Habitat** Notes: adult spawning Habitat System Name: Kelp Bed Notes: juvenile Macrogroup Name Subtidal Mud Bottom Habitat System Name: Submerged Aquatic
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware's Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need
    CHAPTER 1 DELAWARE’S WILDLIFE SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED CHAPTER 1: Delaware’s Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Regional Context ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Delaware’s Animal Biodiversity .................................................................................................................... 10 State of Knowledge of Delaware’s Species ................................................................................................... 10 Delaware’s Wildlife and SGCN - presented by Taxonomic Group .................................................................. 11 Delaware’s 2015 SGCN Status Rank Tier Definitions................................................................................. 12 TIER 1 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 TIER 2 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 TIER 3 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 Mammals ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Translation Series No. 119
    FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Translation Series No. 119 The cod and flounders of far-eastern seas by P.A. Moiseev Original title: Treska i kambaly dalnevostochnykh morei From: Izvestiya Tikhookeanskogo Nauchno-Issiedovaterskogo Instituta Rybnogo Khozyaistva i Okeanografii (TINRO) (Proceedings of the Pacific Scientific Research Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography), 40 : 1-287, 1953 Translated by the Translation Bureau Department of the Secretary of State of Canada Department of the Environment Fisheries and Marine Service BiologibarStatiOn,.Nanaimo, B. C. Biological Station, St-John's, Nfld. 1974 576 pages typescript September 7, 1 31796 - Russian (TVC) 769-18-14 Fisheries Research Board of Canada. MINISTRY OF LIGHT AND FOOD INDUSTRY OF THE USSR. NEWS OF THE TINRO. 1953 Volume XL. BY P. A. MOISEEV. THE COD AND FLOUNDERS OF FAR-EASTERN SEAS. Vladivostok. INTR.ODUCTION The Chukotsky and Bering Seas, the seas of • Okhotsk and of Japan, which was the Far Eastern Shores of the Soviet Union, cover immense areas. The multitude of animals inhabiting these seas is extremely varied. Of fish alone there are up to 800 species, among which some 200 are or can be regarded as exploitable species. Up to the present time the salmon and herring have. been of prevalent industrial importance in the Far East. The immense reserves of these fish, relative simplicity and high effectiveness of the fishing methods employed during the spawning period, simplicity of processing in- volved, excellence of quality of the finished product, all these factors appealed to industrial fishing, fish-proces- sing and fish-marketing organizations. As a result, the entire fishing industry of the Far East was until recen- tly, a passive industry --90% of the catch was obtained by means of stationary fishing implements or fishing cordage cast from the shore (such as seines and casting nets, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • Interrelationships of the Family Pleuronectidae (Pisces: Pleuronectiformes)
    Title INTERRELATIONSHIPS OF THE FAMILY PLEURONECTIDAE (PISCES: PLEURONECTIFORMES) Author(s) SAKAMOTO, Kazuo Citation MEMOIRS OF THE FACULTY OF FISHERIES HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY, 31(1-2), 95-215 Issue Date 1984-12 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/21876 Type bulletin (article) File Information 31(1_2)_P95-215.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP INTERRELATIONSHIPS OF THE FAMILY PLEURONECTIDAE (PISCES: PLEURONECTIFORMES) By Kazuo SAKAMOTO * Laboratory of Marine Zoology, Faculty of Fisheries, Hokkaido University, Hakodate, Japan Contents Page I. Introduction···································································· 95 II. Acknowledgments· ................... ·.·......................................... 96 III. Materials········································································ 97 IV. Methods·····················.··· ... ····················· .......... ············· 102 V. Systematic methodology· ......................................................... 102 1. Application of numerical phenetics .............................................. 102 2. Procedures in the present study ................................................. 104 VI. Comparative morphology ........................................................ 108 1. Jaw apparatus ................................................................ 109 2. Cranium······································································ 111 3. Orbital bones . .. 137 4. Suspensorium and opercular apparatus ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Flounder Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico, United States: a Regional Management Plan
    The Flounder Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico, United States: A Regional Management Plan ..... .. ·. Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission October 2000 Number83 GULF STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION Commissioners and Proxies Alabama Warren Triche Riley Boykin Smith Louisiana House of Representatives Alabama Department of Conservation & Natural 100 Tauzin Lane Resources Thibodaux, Louisiana 70301 64 North Union Street Montgomery, Alabama 36130-1901 Frederic L. Miller proxy: Vernon Minton P.O. Box 5098 Marine Resources Division Shreveport, Louisiana 71135-5098 P.O. Drawer 458 Gulf Shores, Alabama 36547 Mississippi Glenn H. Carpenter Walter Penry Mississippi Department of Marine Resources Alabama House of Representatives 1141 Bayview Avenue, Suite 101 12040 County Road 54 Biloxi, Mississippi 39530 Daphne, Alabama 36526 proxy: William S. “Corky” Perret Mississippi Department of Marine Resources Chris Nelson 1141 Bayview Avenue, Suite 101 Bon Secour Fisheries, Inc. Biloxi, Mississippi 39530 P.O. Box 60 Bon Secour, Alabama 36511 Billy Hewes Mississippi Senate Florida P.O. Box 2387 Allan L. Egbert Gulfport, Mississippi 39505 Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission 620 Meridian Street George Sekul Tallahassee, Florida 323299-1600 805 Beach Boulevard, #302 proxies: Ken Haddad, Director Biloxi, Mississippi 39530 Florida Marine Research Institute 100 Eighth Avenue SE Texas St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 Andrew Sansom Texas Parks & Wildlife Department Ms. Virginia Vail 4200 Smith School Road Division of Marine Resources Austin, Texas 78744 Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission proxies: Hal Osburn and Mike Ray 620 Meridian Street Texas Parks & Wildlife Department Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1600 4200 Smith School Road Austin, Texas 78744 William W. Ward 2221 Corrine Street J.E. “Buster” Brown Tampa, Florida 33605 Texas Senate P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Bulletin No. 78. the Life History of the Starry
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FISH AND GAME BUREAU OF MARINE FISHERIES FISH BULLETIN NO. 78 The Life History of the Starry Flounder Platichthys stellatus (Pallas)1 By HAROLD GEORGE ORCUTT 1950 1 A dissertation submitted to the School of Biological Sciences and the Committee on Graduate Study of Leland Stanford Junior University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, May, 1949. 1 2 3 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In embarking upon investigations of this kind it is necessary to call upon many persons for assistance in particular problems. During the course of this work the author enjoyed the willing cooperation of many workers, and it gives me pleasure to here acknowledge specific aids extended. My thanks go to Dr. Rolf L. Bolin for his direction of this work and his suggestions and criticisms during the course of the investigation and the writing of this paper. I am particularly indebted to Dr. Willis H. Rich and Dr. George S. Myers for encouragement and assistance in Dr. Bolin's absence. To Mr. Julius B. Phillips of the Califor- nia Division of Fish and Game and Dr. Raghu R. Prasad I also extend my thanks for many valuable suggestions, and I take this opportunity to express my sincere appreciation to my colleagues and the staff at the Hopkins Marine Sta- tion for their assistance in collections and technical procedures. The cooperation of the commercial fishermen of Monterey and Santa Cruz in securing samples from the commercial catch is greatly appreciated. Special thanks go to Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Assessment for Winter Flounder
    Species Status Assessment Class: Actinopterygii Family: Pleuronectidae Scientific Name: Pseudopleuronectes americanus Common Name: Winter flounder Species synopsis: The winter flounder is a demersal flatfish commonly found in North Atlantic Ocean estuaries and on the continental shelf. Winter flounder occur from the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada to North Carolina, although they are not abundant south of Delaware Bay. This species is one of the most abundant components of demersal fish in the Long Island Sound and Hudson-Raritan estuary and it is an important commercial and recreational fish throughout its range. Some adults move offshore to cooler, deeper waters during the spring and summer, returning in autumn prior to spawning. Since peak landing levels in 1966, winter flounder landings have experienced peaks and dips, with an overall decline to currently low levels. Threats to essential habitat and overfishing have been two of the major causes of decline of winter flounder, with dredging, pollution, nutrient enrichment, and impingement also contributing to mortality rates. Despite very low current fishing mortality, winter flounder populations around New York have not show any signs of recovery. Winter flounder are also essential prey for osprey in New York, and continued declines of flounder populations may lead to declines in osprey populations (NYSDEC 2005). The New York population is part of the southern New England/Mid-Atlantic (SNE/MA) stock unit managed by the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) in state waters. I. Status a. Current and Legal Protected Status i. Federal ____ __Not Listed ___________________ Candidate? ____No____ ii. New York _______Not listed; SGCN _________________________________________ b.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Arctic Marine Fish Ecology Catalog
    Prepared in cooperation with Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Environmental Studies Program (OCS Study, BOEM 2016-048) Alaska Arctic Marine Fish Ecology Catalog Scientific Investigations Report 2016–5038 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Photographs of various fish studied for this report. Background photograph shows Arctic icebergs and ice floes. Photograph from iStock™, dated March 23, 2011. Alaska Arctic Marine Fish Ecology Catalog By Lyman K. Thorsteinson and Milton S. Love, editors Prepared in cooperation with Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Environmental Studies Program (OCS Study, BOEM 2016-048) Scientific Investigations Report 2016–5038 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2016 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://store.usgs.gov. Disclaimer: This Scientific Investigations Report has been technically reviewed and approved for publication by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. The information is provided on the condition that neither the U.S. Geological Survey nor the U.S. Government may be held liable for any damages resulting from the authorized or unauthorized use of this information. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NE-138
    * NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NE-138 Essential Fish HabitatSource Document: Winter Flounder, Pseudopleuronectes americanus, Life History and Habitat Characteristics U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Northeast Region Northeast Fisheries Science Center Woods Hole, Massachusetts September 1999 Recent Issues 105. Review of American Lobster (Homarusamericanus) Habitat Requirements and Responses to Contaminant Exposures. By Renee Mercaldo-Allen and Catherine A. Kuropat. July 1994. v + 52 p., 29 tables. NTIS Access. No. PB96-115555. 106. Selected Living Resources, Habitat Conditions, and Human Perturbations of the Gulf of Maine: Environmental and Ecological Considerations for Fishery Management. By Richard W. Langton, John B. Pearce, and Jon A. Gibson, eds. August 1994. iv + 70 p., 2 figs., 6 tables. NTIS Access. No. PB95-270906. 107. Invertebrate Neoplasia: Initiation and Promotion Mechanisms -- Proceedings of an International Workshop, 23 June 1992, Washington, D.C. By A. Rosenfield, F.G. Kern, and B.J. Keller, comps. & eds. September 1994. v + 31 p., 8 figs., 3 tables. NTIS Access. No. PB96-164801. 108. Status of Fishery Resources off the Northeastern United States for 1994. By Conservation and Utilization Division, Northeast Fisheries Science Center. January 1995. iv + 140 p., 71 figs., 75 tables. NTIS Access. No. PB95-263414. 109. Proceedings ofthe Symposiu m on the Potential for Development of Aquaculture in Massachusetts: 15-17 February 1995, Chatham/Edgartown/Dartmouth, Massachusetts. By Carlos A. Castro and Scott J. Soares, comps. & eds. January 1996. v + 26 p., I fig., 2 tables. NTIS Access. No. PB97-103782. 110. Length-Length and Length-Weight Relationships for 13 Shark Species from the Western North Atlantic.
    [Show full text]