DOCSLIB.ORG

Ringaskiddy Port Redevelopment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ringaskiddy Port Redevelopment RINGASKIDDY PORT REDEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT VOLUME III b: TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION APPENDICES The sole responsibility of this publication lies with the author. The European Union is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Ringaskiddy Port Redevelopment Environmental Impact Statement ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT VOLUME III b: TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION APPENDICES CONTENTS: Appendix 8.1 Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report Appendix 8.2 Baseline Review Appendix 8.3 POC Strategic Traffic Model Appendix 8.4 Mobility Management Plan Appendix 8.5 AADT Flows Appendix 8.6 Background Traffic Growth Forecasts Appendix 8.7 Trip Generation and Distribution Appendix 8.8 Core Scenario Modelling Results Appendix 8.9 Construction Scenario Modelling Results Appendix 8.10 Core Scenario Mitigation Modelling Results Appendix 8.11 Construction Mitigation Scenario Modelling Results Appendix 8.12 Sensitivity Scenarios Modelling Results Appendix 8.13 Sensitivity Scenarios Mitigation Modelling Results Appendix 8.14 Junction Selection Report NI1004/EIS Ringaskiddy Port Redevelopment Environmental Impact Statement THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK NI1004/EIS Ringaskiddy Port Redevelopment Environmental Impact Statement APPENDIX 8.1 PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT REPORT NI1004/EIS Ringaskiddy Port Redevelopment Environmental Impact Statement THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK NI1004/EIS Ringaskiddy Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report Report for Port of Cork January 2013 N40 N28 Document Control Project Title: Port of Cork Relocation MVA Project Number: 300084 Document Type: Report Directory & File Name: G:\Projects\300084 Port Of Cork\Report - Deliverable\20130111 CCC Ringaskiddy POC_ Relocation Draft Final V7.Docx Document Approval Primary Author: Seán Kearns Other Author(s): Reviewer(s): Ian Byrne, Jack Sheehan Formatted by: Sinéad Canny Distribution Issue Date Distribution Comments 1 17/01/2013 Port of Cork Final Draft This report, and information or advice which it contains, is provided by MVA Consultancy Ltd solely for internal use and reliance by its Client in performance of MVA Consultancy Ltd‘s duties and liabilities under its contract with the Client. Any advice, opinions, or recommendations within this report should be read and relied upon only in the context of the report as a whole. The advice and opinions in this report are based upon the information made available to MVA Consultancy Ltd at the date of this report and on current UK standards, codes, technology and construction practices as at the date of this report. Following final delivery of this report to the Client, MVA Consultancy Ltd will have no further obligations or duty to advise the Client on any matters, including development affecting the information or advice provided in this report. This report has been prepared by MVA Consultancy Ltd in their professional capacity as Consultants. The contents of the report do not, in any way, purport to include any manner of legal advice or opinion. This report is prepared in accordance with the terms and conditions of MVA Consultancy Ltd‘s contract with the Client. Regard should be had to those terms and conditions when considering and/or placing any reliance on this report. Should the Client wish to release this report to a Third Party for that party's reliance, MVA Consultancy Ltd may, at its discretion, agree to such release provided that: (a) MVA Consultancy Ltd's written agreement is obtained prior to such release, and (b) by release of the report to the Third Party, that Third Party does not acquire any rights, contractual or otherwise, whatsoever against MVA Consultancy Ltd and MVA Consultancy Ltd, accordingly, assume no duties, liabilities or obligations to that Third Party, and (c) MVA Consultancy Ltd accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage incurred by the Client or for any conflict of MVA Consultancy Ltd's interests arising out of the Client's release of this report to the Third Party. Contents Foreword 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Port of Cork Strategy Review 1 1.2 Report Overview 1 1.3 Ringaskiddy Strategy Review – Key Differences since 2008 3 1.4 Discussions to Date with An Bord Pleanála (ABP) 7 1.5 Overview of the Assessment 7 1.6 Key Assessment Terminology 8 1.7 The Structure of this Report 11 2 Background 12 2.1 Introduction 12 2.2 Ringaskiddy to Cork: 2008 Perspective 12 2.3 An Bord Pleanála Decision to Refuse Previous Application 13 2.4 Existing Development at Ringaskiddy 13 2.5 Revised Development at Ringaskiddy 14 3 Assessment Approach 17 3.1 Introduction 17 3.2 Approach 17 4 Policy Assessment 20 4.1 Introduction 20 4.2 Policies of Relevance 20 4.3 Policy Interpretation 20 4.4 Impact of Policy on Traffic Growth 23 5 Transport Conditions 25 5.1 Introduction 25 5.2 Ringaskiddy to Cork Corridor 25 5.3 Issues Assessment of Key Points on Port Access Corridor 27 5.4 Traffic Levels on Port Access Corridor 30 5.5 Analysis of Junction Capacities 30 5.6 Impact of Mobility Management in Ringaskiddy 34 5.7 Overall Assessment of Port Access Corridor Conditions 35 Ringaskiddy Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report i Contents 6 Port Traffic Assessment 38 6.1 Introduction 38 6.2 Daily Profile of Port Traffic 38 6.3 Estimated Future Port Traffic by Module 41 6.4 Future Estimated Traffic Levels on Network 44 6.5 Analysis of Port of Cork Ringaskiddy Traffic Impact 46 7 Conclusions and Recommendations 47 7.1 Overview 47 7.2 Summary of Issues 47 7.3 Conclusions 47 Tables Table 2.1 Ringaskiddy Development Modules 14 Table 2.2 Scenario Composition in Terms of Module Numbers 15 Table 5.1 Tivoli Customers Distribution 25 Table 5.2 N28 Issues Summary 28 Table 5.3 PM Peak Junction Capacity Assessment, 2011 – Present Configuration 31 Table 5.4 PM Peak Junction Capacity Assessment, 2030 – Present Configuration 31 Table 5.5 PM Peak Junction Capacity Assessment, 2030 – Upgraded Configurations 31 Table 6.1 Ringaskiddy Existing Traffic Levels 38 Table 6.2 Contribution of Existing Ringaskiddy Port Traffic on the Port Access Corridor 40 Table 6.3 Ringaskiddy Traffic Generation Assumptions 42 Table 6.4 Ringaskiddy Cumulative Traffic Generation 43 Table 6.5 Port of Cork 2012 and 2030 AADT Traffic Estimates on N28 44 Figures Figure 1.1 Overview of Key Road Network 6 Figure 1.2 Overall Assessment Approach Overview 8 Figure 1.3 Traffic Flow Concepts 10 Figure 2.1 Proposed Ringaskiddy Development Modules 16 Figure 3.1 Assessment Flowchart 19 Figure 5.1 Key Network Points on Ringaskiddy Port Access Corridor 26 Figure 5.2 Trend in Average Daily Traffic at Dunkettle 27 Figure 5.3 Ringaskiddy to Cork AADTs 30 Figure 5.4 Delay (secs) Bloomfield (DLUTS Model, AM 2022) 33 Figure 5.5 Delay (secs) Bloomfield (Dunkettle Model, AM 2016) 33 Figure 5.6 Major Employers‘ Locations in Ringaskiddy 34 Figure 5.7 N28 Junctions for Mobility Management Results 36 Figure 5.8 2016 Traffic Flow N28 Southbound 37 Figure 6.1 Traffic Totals All Port of Cork Sites 38 Figure 6.2 Tivoli Average Daily HGV Traffic Profile 39 Figure 6.3 Ringaskiddy Average Daily HGV Traffic Profile 40 Figure 6.4 Contribution of Existing Ringaskiddy Port Traffic along the Port Access Corridor41 Figure 6.5 Present PoC AADT Vs 2030 PoC AADT Including Ringaskiddy Scenario E 45 Figure 6.6 Present Vs Future Peak Hour Ringaskiddy Traffic 45 Ringaskiddy Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report ii Executive Summary Purpose of this Report The Port of Cork Company is intending to prepare a planning application to An Bord Pleanála (ABP) under the Planning & Development (Strategic Infrastructure) Act 2006 (2006 Act) for an expansion of its port facilities at Ringaskiddy, Co. Cork. The expanded facilities at Ringaskiddy will facilitate, on a phased basis, the Port of Cork in transferring container handling out of Tivoli and the bulk goods handling from Tivoli and the City Quays in Cork Docklands in due course. This will provide significant opportunity for sustainable development of non-industrial activity in the heart of Cork City. The key advantage of the Ringaskiddy site is its ability to handle deep water shipping and thus accommodate larger vessels into the future in line with current trends in vessel size growth. This report represents the first stage of the traffic and transport assessment of the Port of Cork‘s development proposals at Ringaskiddy. It is necessary for the Port of Cork to submit a planning application through An Bord Pleanála for this development as it is likely to be deemed to be strategic infrastructure. This report presents a detailed discussion of the transport issues surrounding this pending application and includes traffic modelling analysis extracted from the NRA Dunkettle Traffic Model. It is intended that this report will form part of an overall package of analysis that will provide An Bord Pleanála (ABP) with a complete view of the impacts of the Ringaskiddy development proposals. The analysis included in this report is based on surveys of port and strategic network traffic on the N28 in April and May, 2012. This provides a basis for assessing the likely impact and thus the viability of the proposed port development at Ringaskiddy. The subsequent application will include further detailed modelling analyses, also based on the Dunkettle Model, with specific refinements in the Ringaskiddy area. Background In November 2007 an application was made to An Bord Pleanála, as required under the 2006 Act, for the development of a container terminal and multi-purpose Ro-Ro berth at Ringaskiddy Deep-water port and ferry terminal (Ringaskiddy Oyster Bank development). ABP refused the application on the grounds that the expansion of Ringaskiddy would generate adverse impacts on the strategic road network and the lack of a rail connection to the Ringaskiddy site was not consistent with sustainable planning.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 7. Roads and Traffic
    Indaver Ringaskiddy Resource Recovery Centre Environmental Impact Statement 7. Roads and Traffic Introduction This section of the EIS identifies and evaluates the likely significant impacts of the traffic generated by the proposed Ringaskiddy Resource Recovery Centre, both during its construction and operational phases. This section describes the existing traffic situation in the area surrounding the site and provides a description of the local road network. Existing traffic levels are quantified and existing facilities for public transport, cyclists and pedestrians are described. Brief details of the proposed development are provided and the trip generation and distribution methodologies are explained. The impact of the generated traffic on the local road network is assessed and mitigation measures which Indaver intend to include in their development proposals are investigated where necessary. It is clear from the extensive consultations which Indaver have carried out with both the local community and the statutory authorities that traffic congestion on the main N28 approaches to Ringaskiddy and to the site, and how this congestion should be managed during the peak hours, is a major concern. Indaver welcomes the recent announcement of the inclusion of the N28 upgrade and the pending implementation of the proposed improvements to the Dunkettle Interchange as part of the Government Capital Budget to 2021 announced recently, although these are not necessary for this project. While these road upgrades will facilitate the free flow of all strategic traffic when complete, Indaver also recognise that peak hour capacity on this strategic route will require ongoing management into the future to ensure that the corridor continues to have capacity at critical periods.
    [Show full text]
  • 0554 Port of Cork 3
    CORK TO THE WORLD Updated Economic Assessment of the N28 Cork to Ringaskiddy Scheme. June 2014 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements v Executive Summary vi 1. Introduction and Background 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Terms of Reference 1 1.3 Background and Economic Context 1 2. Methodology 4 2.1 Introduction 4 2.2 Consultation Programme and Primary Research 4 2.3 Analytical Methodologies 5 3. Transportation Benefits of N28 Upgrade 7 3.1 Introduction and Description of Scheme 7 3.2 Net Transportation Benefits of N28 Upgrade 8 3.3 Summary of Key Conclusions 12 4. External Connectivity and Port-related Impacts 13 4.1 Introduction 13 4.2 Context and Port Sector Trends 13 4.3 Importance of the N28 Upgrade 15 4.4 Implications of Failure to Meet Port Capacity Needs 16 4.5 Summary of Key Conclusions 20 5. Enhancement of the Ringaskiddy Industry and Research Cluster 21 5.1 Introduction 21 5.2 FDI-related Benefits of N28 Upgrade 21 5.3 Role of N28 Upgrade in Development of IMERC 25 5.4 Summary of Key Conclusions 29 6. N28 as Catalyst for Wider Regional Development 31 6.1 Introduction 31 6.2 Tourism Sector Development 31 6.3 Potential Influential Role of N28 in Development of Cork Docklands 34 6.4 Summary of Key Conclusions 36 7. Views of the Business Community 37 7.1 Introduction 37 7.2 Key Research Findings 37 8. Conclusions and Recommendations 46 8.1 Introduction 46 8.2 Sectoral Impacts of N28 Upgrade 46 8.3 Overall Conclusions and Recommendations 49 Annex 1 List of Consultees 51 Annex 2 Additional Findings from Survey of Businesses 52 i Tables, FIGures
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Report Issue 1
    www.indaver.ie RINGASKIDDY RESOURCE RECOVERY CENTRE 2016 Planning Report PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACTS FINAL PLANNING REPORT ON THE PROPOSED RINGASKIDDY RESOURCE RECOVERY CENTRE, RINGASKIDDY, CO. CORK on behalf of the INDAVER Prepared and submitted in JANUARY 2016 Coakley O’Neill Town Planning Ltd NSC Campus Mahon Cork T: 021 2307000 F: 021 2307047 E: [email protected] W: www.coakleyoneill.ie INDEX PAGE 1. Introduction and Purpose 4 2. Site Location and Zoning 4 3. Planning History 7 4. Proposed Development 10 5. Waste and planning policy considerations 11 6. Planning Assessment 32 6.1 Do Nothing Scenario 32 6.2 Locational Issues 32 6.3 Assessment of previous reasons for refusal 38 6.4 Environmental Impact 43 6.5 Community Gain 50 6.6 Consultation 50 6.7 Property Valuation 50 7. Conclusion 51 Appendix 1 Property Report 1. Introduction and Purpose This planning report has been prepared to accompany the application made under section 37E of the Planning and Development Act 2000 by Indaver Ireland Limited (“Indaver”) for permission to develop the Ringaskiddy Resource Recovery Centre, comprising a Waste to Energy Facility (waste incinerator with energy recovery, and associated works on lands located in the townland of Ringaskiddy, Co. Cork. The purpose of this planning report is to set out the planning policy context within which the proposed development is advanced, and to consider issues of compliance with the development management standards of the Cork County Development Plan 2014 and the Carrigaline Electoral Area Local Area Plan 2015. An assessment of the proposed development in the context of the planning history of the site, including reference against the previous decision of An Bord Pleanála is also set out in the report.
    [Show full text]
  • M28 Cork to Ringaskiddy Project
    M28 CORK TO RINGASKIDDY PROJECT REPORT OF TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANT [ISSUE 01, MAY 2018] M28 Cork to Ringaskiddy Project Report of Traffic and Transportation Consultant Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................1 2. Description of existing N28 Corridor ..............................................................................................3 3. Description of Scheme ..................................................................................................................7 3.1 Main elements of the Scheme ...........................................................................................7 3.2 Provisions for cyclists and pedestrians ...............................................................................8 4. Evaluation of Alternatives ........................................................................................................... 10 4.1 Do-Nothing / Do-Minimum Alternative ............................................................................. 10 4.2 Evaluation of Do-Something Alternatives ......................................................................... 10 5. Route Corridor Options ............................................................................................................... 14 5.1 Cross-section for the M28 ............................................................................................... 14 5.2 Bloomfield Interchange to Shannonpark
    [Show full text]
  • Youghal Town Council Plan SEA.Pdf
    YOUGHAL EOCHAILL Development Plan 2009-2015 VOLUME lll Strategic Environmental Assessment Youghal Town Council February 2009 Youghal Town Development Plan 2009 – 2015 SEA Environmental Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 NON -TECHNICAL SUMMARY ............................................................................................. 4 BIODIVERSITY , F LORA AND FAUNA ............................................................................................... 4 HUMAN HEALTH (A IR AND NOISE )................................................................................................. 5 SOIL AND GEOLOGY (I NCLUDING MINERALS ) ................................................................................. 5 WATER ................................................................................................................................... 5 TRANSPORTATION ........................................................................................................................ 5 WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER .............................................................................................. 6 CULTURAL HERITAGE ................................................................................................................... 6 LANDSCAPE ................................................................................................................................. 6 2 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 10 2.1 SEA B ACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and Policy Context
    APPENDIX 2A REGIONAL PLANNING AND LOCAL PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT The following table sets out the planning policy context for the subject site and the area in which it is situated. At a regional level, the Regional Planning Guidelines for the South West Region 2010‐2012 is applicable. At a sub‐regional scale, the site is located within that area guided by the Cork Area Strategic Plan 2001‐2020 (as updated in 2008). The Cork County Development Plan 2014‐2020 which provides the county level planning policies for development in the area is also considered. The Cork City Development Plan is also referred to given the City’s close proximity to the study area and linkages with the Port of Cork. On a local scale, the site is located within the Carrigaline Electoral Area and hence the Carrigaline Electoral Area Local Area Plan 2011 is of relevance. The relevant Local Area Plan for the area is currently being reviewed. The subject site falls within the draft Ballincollig‐Carrigaline Municipal District Local Area Plan area. Table 1: Planning Policy Context Plan Content Relevance to Subject Site/Study Area and Commentary Regional Planning Guidelines for Purpose: This Plan provides a strategic framework for the development of counties Cork Purpose: Sets guiding principles for plans lower down in the the South West Region 2010‐ and Kerry, to implement the policies of the National Spatial Strategy (NSS) at regional and planning policy hierarchy and for development management 2022 (South West Regional local level and to guide policies and provisions of county and local area plans.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Rd Workplan
    North Sea Mediterranean Third Work Plan of the European Coordinator Péter Balázs JUNE 2018 Mobility and Transport North Sea Mediterranean Core Network Corridor, Work Plan of the Coordinator June 2018 This report represents the opinion of the European Coordinator and does not prejudice the official position of the European Commission. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for any potential use, which may be made of the information contained herein. June 2018 Page 2 North Sea Mediterranean Core Network Corridor, Work Plan of the Coordinator Contents 1. Towards the North Sea Mediterranean corridor updated Work Plan ....................... 6 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 6 1.2 Road map to setting up the Third Work Plan ................................................ 7 1.3 Funding achieved through Connecting Europe Facility ..................................11 2. Characteristics of the North Sea Mediterranean Corridor ....................................13 2.1 Alignment ..............................................................................................13 2.2 Compliance with the technical infrastructure parameters of the TEN-T guidelines in 2017 ................................................................................14 2.2.1 Railway network and rail/road terminals ......................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Inspector's Report HA0053 MA0014
    Inspector’s Report HA0053 MA0014 File References 04.HA0053 – M28 Cork to Ringaskiddy Motorway Scheme 04.MA0014 – Cork to Ringaskiddy Motorway Scheme, Protected Road Scheme and Service Area 2017 Development M28 Cork to Ringaskiddy Road Project and Motorway Scheme with Service Area at Ringaskiddy Applicant Cork County Council Type of Applications HA0053 – Strategic Infrastructure Development, S51(2) Roads Act 1993 MA0014 – Local Authority Projects – M28 Motorway Scheme Project Cork to Ringaskiddy; Protected Road Scheme; and Service Area Scheme Dates of Oral Hearing 7th-10th November; 14th to 17th th st November; 28 Nov.to 1 December th th th th 24 July, 25 July, 18 October, 26 th th Date of Site Inspections October, 27 October, 11 November, HA0053 and MA0014 Inspector’s Report Page 1 of 425 13th November, 2017 Inspector Mary Kennelly Appendices Appendix 1 Summary of Observations Appendix 2 Report of Traffic and Transport Consultant appointed by the Board HA0053 and MA0014 Inspector’s Report Page 2 of 425 Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 9 2 Site Location and Description ............................................................................ 10 3 Proposed Development ..................................................................................... 11 3.1 TEN-T Core Route ...................................................................................... 11 3.2 Declassified N28 ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cork Area Strategic Plan – Strategy for Additional Economic and Population Growth - an Update
    Cork Area Strategic Plan – Strategy for Additional Economic and Population Growth - An Update Indecon International Economic Consultants, RPS and Savills HOK 1 July 2008 Contents Page Executive Summary i 1 Introduction and Background 1 1.1 Background and Context 1 1.2 The Study Area 1 1.3 Key Development Issues Facing Cork 3 1.4 Goals and Objectives 5 1.5 Phasing of CASP 7 1.6 Progress towards Achievement of CASP Goals 8 1.7 Structure of Report 15 2 Detailed Economic and Investment Strategy 16 2.1 SWOT analysis of CASP area 16 2.2 Identification of Optimal Economic Development Models 19 2.3 Proposed Sectoral Economic Development Strategy 19 3 Proposed Overall Strategic Plan 27 3.1 Introduction 27 3.2 Key Concepts 30 3.3 Housing Location 61 3.4 Additional Floorspace and Associated Land Requirements 64 3.5 Front Loading of Infrastructure and the Integrated Transport System 67 4 Phasing the Strategic Plan 127 4.1 Introduction 127 4.2 Overall Strategy 131 Contents Page 4.3 Phasing Programme for Cork City 132 4.4 Phasing Programme for Metropolitan Cork 133 4.5 Phasing Programme for Ring Towns and Rural Areas 134 5 Implementing the Strategic Plan 136 5.1 Institutional Processes 137 5.2 Marketing and Branding 144 5.3 Funding 145 5.4 Monitoring of Progress 150 ANNEXES 154 Annex 1 Glossary and Definitions 155 Annex 2 List of Submissions Made prior to Draft 156 Annex 3 List of Submissions Made post Draft 158 Annex 4 CASP Infrastructure Capital Investment Expenditure 161 Annex 5 CASP Transport Priorities 162 Annex 6 Larger Scale Maps 173 Tables &
    [Show full text]
  • Inspector's Report PA0045
    Inspector’s Report PA0045. Development Resource Recovery Centre development, comprising a Waste to Energy Facility (waste incinerator with energy recovery) for the treatment of non-hazardous and hazardous waste. The development also includes an upgrade to a section of the L2545 road; coastal protection measures on Gobby Beach; a connection to the national electricity distribution grid; the raising the ground levels in part of the site; the provision of an amenity For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. walkway along the eastern and part southern boundary of the site and associated works. Location Ringaskiddy, County Cork. Applicant Indaver Ireland. Type of Application Application to the Board pursuant to section 37E. Dates of Site Inspection 14th March 2016, 5th April 2016, 21st th April 2016, 6 September 2016 Inspector Derek Daly. 04.PA0045 An Bord Pleanála Page 1 of 144 EPA Export 20-07-2019:03:55:48 1.0 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 2.0 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 3.0 PLANNING HISTORY 4.0 POLICY CONTEXT 5.0 SUBMISSION FROM CORK COUNTY COUNCIL 6.0 SUBMISSIONS FROM PROSCRIBED AND PUBLIC BODIES 6.1 The Department of Arts Heritage and the Gaeltacht. 6.2 The Health and Safety Authority. 6.3 An Taisce. 6.4 HSE South. 6.5 Irish Water. 6.5 Southern Regional Assembly. 6.7 South Regional Waste Management Office 6.8 Transport Infrastructure Ireland. 6.9 EPA. 6.10 Department of Defence. 7.0 OBSERVER SUBMISSIONS 7.1 Public Representatives. 7.2 Organisations and Community Groups. 7.3 Other observers. For inspection purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • Cork County Development Plan Review Section 12(4) Chief Executive’S Report
    Cork County Development Plan Review Section 12(4) Chief Executive’s Report Volume II: Chief Executive’s Responses and Recommendations • June 2014 Section 12(4) Chief Executive’s Report Volume II 2014 2 Section 12(4) Chief Executive’s Report Volume II 2014 Contents Section 2(a)(i) Chief Executive’s Response to the Submissions from the Department of Environment, Community and Local Government and South West Regional Authority 4 Section 2(a)(ii) All other Submissions (by interested party A-Z) 15 Section 2(b) Chief Executive’s Response to the Planning SPC Submission 283 Section 2(c) Chief Executive’s Response to the Submissions made to Appendix G (Residential Density Proposed Changes to Electoral Area LAP Zoning Objectives) 312 3 Section 12(4) Chief Executive’s Report Volume II 2014 Section 2(a)(i): Submissions from the Department of Environment and South West Regional Authority Name of Interested Party PPU Submission Summary Principal Issues Raised Chief Executive’s Response Chief Executive’s and Unique Reference Recommendation Number Minister for the 1) Draft Plan sets out a strong and 1. Should the Draft Plan be amended to 1 to 4. See Volume 1, Section 1(b) 1 to 4. See Environment, effective development strategy. 2) provide a clearer overall framework for Core Strategy” A ”Housing Land Volume 1, Section Community and Local Recognise requirement for effective deciding on the scale, phasing and location Supply and Zoning Policy 1(b) “Core Government engagement by relevant of new development lands in Local Area Framework for LAPs” Strategy” A dCDP14/1842 infrastructure providers.
    [Show full text]
  • EIAR-2019-Appendix-3.1-Planning-Report-In-Relation-To-Industrial-Lands-Within
    Appendix 3.1 Planning Report Indaver Ringaskiddy Resource Recovery Centre Environmental Impact Assessment Report Appendix 3.1 Page 1 PLANNING REPORT In relation to INDUSTRIAL LANDS WITHIN METROPOLITAN CORK On behalf of INDAVER IRELAND LIMITED Prepared By COAKLEY O’NEILL TOWN PLANNING LTD. June 2019 Coakley O’Neill Town Planning Ltd. Registered Office: NSC Campus, Mahon, Cork, Ireland t +353(0)21 230 7000 f +353(0)21 2307070 e [email protected] w www.coakleyoneill.ie A Private Company Limited by Shares VAT Reg. No.IE 9737006B Registered in Ireland No. 480 633 Directors: Dave Coakley, Aiden O’Neill Document Control Sheet Client Indaver Ireland Limited Project Title Indaver Industrial Lands Assessments Job No. CON19021 Document Title Planning Report: Industrial Lands within Metropolitan Cork Number of Pages 74 Revision Status Date of Issue Authored Checked Signed 1 Draft 13th March 2019 DC AON 2 Second Draft 20th May 2019 DC AON 3 Final Draft 23rd May 2019 DC AON 4 Final 20th June, 2019 DC AON Condfidentiality Statement This report has been produced for the exclusive use of the commissioning party and unless otherwise agreed in writing by Coakley O’Neill Town Planning Ltd., no other party may copy, reproduce, distribute, make use of, or rely on the contents of the report. No liability is accpted by Coakley O’Neill Town Planning Ltd. for any use of this report, other than for the purposes for which it was originally prepared and provided. Opinions and infromation provided in this reprt are on the basis of Coakley O’Neill using due skill, care and diligence in the preparation of same and no explicit warranty is provided as their accuracy.
    [Show full text]