DOCSLIB.ORG

6.0 the Existing Environment Material Assets

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
6.0 the Existing Environment Material Assets Hammond Lane Metal CO, Ringaskiddy EIS 6.0 THE EXISTING ENVIRONMENT 6.7 MATERIAL ASSETS For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. Ray Keane & Associates - Material Assets 265 EPA Export 29-07-2014:23:46:50 Hammond Lane Metal CO,Ringaskiddy EIS For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. Ray Keane & Associates - Material Assets 266 EPA Export 29-07-2014:23:46:50 Hammond Lane Metal CO,Ringaskiddy EIS Section Contents: 6.7 Material Assets - The Existing Environment. 6.7.1 Introduction. 6.7.2 The Existing Environment. 6.7.2.1 Site Suitability. 6.7.2.2 Property Local to the Development. 6.7.2.3 Amenity and Areas of Natural Beauty. 6.7.2.4 Removal of Soil and Rock. 6.7.2.5 Power Consumption. 6.7.2.6 Water Consumption. 6.7.2.7 The Waste Metal Recovery Industry. For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. Ray Keane & Associates - Material Assets 267 EPA Export 29-07-2014:23:46:50 Hammond Lane Metal CO,Ringaskiddy EIS For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. Ray Keane & Associates - Material Assets 268 EPA Export 29-07-2014:23:46:50 Hammond Lane Metal CO,Ringaskiddy EIS 6.7 Mate r ia I Assets . 6.7.1 Introduction. The following are the relevant headings under which effects of the proposed development on the material assets of the locality may be considered. These headings are considered as additional to the impacts considered under specialist environmental section (Air, Soil, Water, Ecology, Noise, Traffic, Visual, Impacts). Effects on Values of Property. Effects on amenity and areas of natural beauty. Effects of removal of soil and rock. Effects on power consumption. Effects on water consumption. Effects on the waste metal recovery industry. 6.7.2 The Existing Environment. 6.7.2.1 Site Suitability. The site, as the site of an existingFor inspection scrap purposes metal only. recovery business which is to be further developed withoutConsent acquisition of copyright owner of additionalrequired for any lands other use.is considered as suitable for the development in its likelihood to produce lower impacts generally than relocation to another site. 6.7.2.2 Property Local to the Development. Ringaskiddy Village is located more than 500m to the west of the Development. No impact on values is likely to arise from this development. One domestic residence located 300m west of the western boundary of the development is the only domestic residence capable of being affected. This house is currently un-occupied. All other developments close to the proposed development are either industrial or institutional / educational. No impact on value of these developments would arise. Immediately adjacent undeveloped land has been the subject of application for development in the related activity of waste disposal. This possibility or any other industrial activity permitted within the current zoning of this land would not be affected by the proposed HLMC development. Ray Keane & Associates - Material Assets 269 EPA Export 29-07-2014:23:46:50 Harnrnond Lane Metal CO, Ringaskiddy EIS 6.7.2.3 Amenity and areas of Natural Beauty. The site is generally part of the landscape surrounding Cork Harbour. The local attraction of the Martello Tower is sited to the south of the site. A small local beach is sited to the east of the site. 6.7.2.4 Removal of Soil and Rock. The existing north facing slope on which the site is located has in the past been used to some extent for the extraction of material used in local works of reclaiming land for Port development, north of the N28 roadway. Excess material extraction from the site in the development carried out in 1991 was disposed of in raising of levels for lands north of the N28 roadway. 6.7.2.5 Power Consumption. The site is served by a 110 KV overhead line which feeds and ESB transformer station adjoining the east of the site. This power is further stepped down to 380V in a consumer electrical compound on the site. Existing power consumption is approximately 2,000 kVA. 6.7.2.6 Water Consumption. A 450mm watermain is located in the N28 roadway fronting the site. Pressure measured atFor yard inspection level purposes on the only. site (9m O.D.) was in excess of 6 bar. CurrentlyConsent the ofwater copyright consumption owner required forof anythe other site use. on an annual basis is estimated at 990,000 lit per annum. 6.7.2.7 The Waste Metal Recovery Industry. The site currently provides metal recycling by fragmentation (mainly end of life vehicles) of between 40,OOOTe and 50,000Te per annum. This represents approximately 25% of the potential regional market for scrap metal in this category. Ray Keane & Associates - Material Assets 270 EPA Export 29-07-2014:23:46:50 i Hammond Lane Metal CO,Ringaskiddy EIS 6.0 THE EXISTING ENVIRONMENT 6.8 ARCHAEOLOGY For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. Lane Purcell -Archaeology 271 EPA Export 29-07-2014:23:46:50 i Hammond Lane Metal CO,Ringaskiddy EIS For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. Lane Purcell -Archaeology 272 EPA Export 29-07-2014:23:46:50 Hammond Lane Metal CO,Ringaskiddy EIS Section Contents: 6.8 Archaeology - The Existing Environment. 6.8.1 Introduction. 6.8.1.1 Proposal for Site Development. 6.8.1.2 Purpose of Report. 6.8.1.3 No Archaeological Sites. 6.8.1.4 Archaeological Sites within 2km radius. 6.8.1.5 Author of Report. 6.8.1.6 Explanation of Terms. 6.8.2 Methodology. 6.8.2.1 Methods. 6.8.2.2 Legislation and Guidelines. 6.8.2.3 Desktop Study. 6.8.2.4 Site Inspection. 6.8.3 Cultural Heritage and the Existing Environment. 6.8.3.1 Landscape. 6.8.3.2 Prehistoric For inspection Period. purposes only. 6.8.3.3 EarlyConsent Medieval of copyright owner Period. required for any other use. 6.8.3.4 Medieval Period. 6.8.3.5 Post-Medieval Period. 6.8.3.6. Archaeological Investigations. 6.8.3.7 Buildings and Structures. 6.8.3.8 Cartographic Sources. 6.8.3.9 Site Inspection. List of Tables and Figures Table 6.8.1 Archaeological site included on the RMP and Sites and Monuments database within a 2km radius of the proposed development site. Lane Purcell -Archaeology 273 EPA Export 29-07-2014:23:46:50 i Hammond Lane Metal CO, Ringaskiddy EIS For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. Lane Purcell -Archaeology 274 EPA Export 29-07-2014:23:46:50 Hammond Lane Metal CO, Ringaskiddy EIS 6.8 Archaeoloqv. 6.8.1 Introduction. 6.8.1.1 Proposal for Site Development. Hammond Lane Metal Company is proposing to extend its plant at Ringaskiddy, CO Cork. The company currently carries out a metal fragmentation process on the site and is proposing to expand its facility to undertake end of life de-pollution of motor vehicles, reception, sorting, baling and dispatch of non-ferrous metals and the provision of a ferrous metal shearing facility. 6.8.1.2 Purpose of Report. This report comprises an environmental impact statement of the land intended for this development. The purpose of this assessment is to evaluate the potential impact such a development would have on the cultural heritage of the development site and surrounding area. 6.8.1.3 No Archaeological Sites. There are no recorded archaeological sites within the proposed development site. 6.8.1.4 Archaeological Sites within 2km radius. There are a total of twenty-three archaeological sites listed in the Record of Monuments and Places (RMP) For inspectionfor CO Corkpurposes within only. a 2km radius of the proposed Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. development. There are a further fifteen archaeological site recorded on the Sites and Monuments database of the National Monuments Service (www.excavations.ie) which are listed for inclusion in the RMP. These provide evidence for human settlement and activity in the area dating back to the Bronze Age. 6.8.1.5 Author of Report. This section of the Environmental Impact Statement was carried out by Avril Purcell of Lane Purcell Archaeology, Deanrock Business Park, Togher, Cork at the request of Ray Keane & Associates, Consulting Engineers, 2 Clogheen Business Park, Blarney Road, Cork. 6.8.1.6 Explanation of Terms. Some terms used in this report are explained hereunder; Cultural Heritage: The phrase ‘Cultural Heritage’ is a generic term that spans thousands of years and covers a multitude of cultural, archaeological and architectural sites and monuments within the landscape. EPA Guidelines (2003), define cultural heritage as including history, landscape and garden design, folklore and tradition, geological Lane Purcell -Archaeology 275 EPA Export 29-07-2014:23:46:50 i Hammond Lane Metal CO, Ringaskiddy EIS features, language and dialect, religion, settlements, inland watetways (rivers) and place names. Study Area: In order to obtain a comprehensive assessment of the Cultural Heritage Environment, a study area within a circa 2km radius of the proposed development site was examined. 6.8.2 Methodology. 6.8.2.1 Methods. The methodology used to complete the Cultural Heritage section of this EIS comprised the following: A review of the relevant Legislation and Guidelines A desktop assessment of the proposed development site and Study Area 0 A site inspection of the proposed development site. 6.8.2.2 Legislation and Guidelines.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 7. Roads and Traffic
    Indaver Ringaskiddy Resource Recovery Centre Environmental Impact Statement 7. Roads and Traffic Introduction This section of the EIS identifies and evaluates the likely significant impacts of the traffic generated by the proposed Ringaskiddy Resource Recovery Centre, both during its construction and operational phases. This section describes the existing traffic situation in the area surrounding the site and provides a description of the local road network. Existing traffic levels are quantified and existing facilities for public transport, cyclists and pedestrians are described. Brief details of the proposed development are provided and the trip generation and distribution methodologies are explained. The impact of the generated traffic on the local road network is assessed and mitigation measures which Indaver intend to include in their development proposals are investigated where necessary. It is clear from the extensive consultations which Indaver have carried out with both the local community and the statutory authorities that traffic congestion on the main N28 approaches to Ringaskiddy and to the site, and how this congestion should be managed during the peak hours, is a major concern. Indaver welcomes the recent announcement of the inclusion of the N28 upgrade and the pending implementation of the proposed improvements to the Dunkettle Interchange as part of the Government Capital Budget to 2021 announced recently, although these are not necessary for this project. While these road upgrades will facilitate the free flow of all strategic traffic when complete, Indaver also recognise that peak hour capacity on this strategic route will require ongoing management into the future to ensure that the corridor continues to have capacity at critical periods.
    [Show full text]
  • 0554 Port of Cork 3
    CORK TO THE WORLD Updated Economic Assessment of the N28 Cork to Ringaskiddy Scheme. June 2014 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements v Executive Summary vi 1. Introduction and Background 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Terms of Reference 1 1.3 Background and Economic Context 1 2. Methodology 4 2.1 Introduction 4 2.2 Consultation Programme and Primary Research 4 2.3 Analytical Methodologies 5 3. Transportation Benefits of N28 Upgrade 7 3.1 Introduction and Description of Scheme 7 3.2 Net Transportation Benefits of N28 Upgrade 8 3.3 Summary of Key Conclusions 12 4. External Connectivity and Port-related Impacts 13 4.1 Introduction 13 4.2 Context and Port Sector Trends 13 4.3 Importance of the N28 Upgrade 15 4.4 Implications of Failure to Meet Port Capacity Needs 16 4.5 Summary of Key Conclusions 20 5. Enhancement of the Ringaskiddy Industry and Research Cluster 21 5.1 Introduction 21 5.2 FDI-related Benefits of N28 Upgrade 21 5.3 Role of N28 Upgrade in Development of IMERC 25 5.4 Summary of Key Conclusions 29 6. N28 as Catalyst for Wider Regional Development 31 6.1 Introduction 31 6.2 Tourism Sector Development 31 6.3 Potential Influential Role of N28 in Development of Cork Docklands 34 6.4 Summary of Key Conclusions 36 7. Views of the Business Community 37 7.1 Introduction 37 7.2 Key Research Findings 37 8. Conclusions and Recommendations 46 8.1 Introduction 46 8.2 Sectoral Impacts of N28 Upgrade 46 8.3 Overall Conclusions and Recommendations 49 Annex 1 List of Consultees 51 Annex 2 Additional Findings from Survey of Businesses 52 i Tables, FIGures
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Report Issue 1
    www.indaver.ie RINGASKIDDY RESOURCE RECOVERY CENTRE 2016 Planning Report PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACTS FINAL PLANNING REPORT ON THE PROPOSED RINGASKIDDY RESOURCE RECOVERY CENTRE, RINGASKIDDY, CO. CORK on behalf of the INDAVER Prepared and submitted in JANUARY 2016 Coakley O’Neill Town Planning Ltd NSC Campus Mahon Cork T: 021 2307000 F: 021 2307047 E: [email protected] W: www.coakleyoneill.ie INDEX PAGE 1. Introduction and Purpose 4 2. Site Location and Zoning 4 3. Planning History 7 4. Proposed Development 10 5. Waste and planning policy considerations 11 6. Planning Assessment 32 6.1 Do Nothing Scenario 32 6.2 Locational Issues 32 6.3 Assessment of previous reasons for refusal 38 6.4 Environmental Impact 43 6.5 Community Gain 50 6.6 Consultation 50 6.7 Property Valuation 50 7. Conclusion 51 Appendix 1 Property Report 1. Introduction and Purpose This planning report has been prepared to accompany the application made under section 37E of the Planning and Development Act 2000 by Indaver Ireland Limited (“Indaver”) for permission to develop the Ringaskiddy Resource Recovery Centre, comprising a Waste to Energy Facility (waste incinerator with energy recovery, and associated works on lands located in the townland of Ringaskiddy, Co. Cork. The purpose of this planning report is to set out the planning policy context within which the proposed development is advanced, and to consider issues of compliance with the development management standards of the Cork County Development Plan 2014 and the Carrigaline Electoral Area Local Area Plan 2015. An assessment of the proposed development in the context of the planning history of the site, including reference against the previous decision of An Bord Pleanála is also set out in the report.
    [Show full text]
  • M28 Cork to Ringaskiddy Project
    M28 CORK TO RINGASKIDDY PROJECT REPORT OF TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANT [ISSUE 01, MAY 2018] M28 Cork to Ringaskiddy Project Report of Traffic and Transportation Consultant Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................1 2. Description of existing N28 Corridor ..............................................................................................3 3. Description of Scheme ..................................................................................................................7 3.1 Main elements of the Scheme ...........................................................................................7 3.2 Provisions for cyclists and pedestrians ...............................................................................8 4. Evaluation of Alternatives ........................................................................................................... 10 4.1 Do-Nothing / Do-Minimum Alternative ............................................................................. 10 4.2 Evaluation of Do-Something Alternatives ......................................................................... 10 5. Route Corridor Options ............................................................................................................... 14 5.1 Cross-section for the M28 ............................................................................................... 14 5.2 Bloomfield Interchange to Shannonpark
    [Show full text]
  • Youghal Town Council Plan SEA.Pdf
    YOUGHAL EOCHAILL Development Plan 2009-2015 VOLUME lll Strategic Environmental Assessment Youghal Town Council February 2009 Youghal Town Development Plan 2009 – 2015 SEA Environmental Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 NON -TECHNICAL SUMMARY ............................................................................................. 4 BIODIVERSITY , F LORA AND FAUNA ............................................................................................... 4 HUMAN HEALTH (A IR AND NOISE )................................................................................................. 5 SOIL AND GEOLOGY (I NCLUDING MINERALS ) ................................................................................. 5 WATER ................................................................................................................................... 5 TRANSPORTATION ........................................................................................................................ 5 WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER .............................................................................................. 6 CULTURAL HERITAGE ................................................................................................................... 6 LANDSCAPE ................................................................................................................................. 6 2 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 10 2.1 SEA B ACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and Policy Context
    APPENDIX 2A REGIONAL PLANNING AND LOCAL PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT The following table sets out the planning policy context for the subject site and the area in which it is situated. At a regional level, the Regional Planning Guidelines for the South West Region 2010‐2012 is applicable. At a sub‐regional scale, the site is located within that area guided by the Cork Area Strategic Plan 2001‐2020 (as updated in 2008). The Cork County Development Plan 2014‐2020 which provides the county level planning policies for development in the area is also considered. The Cork City Development Plan is also referred to given the City’s close proximity to the study area and linkages with the Port of Cork. On a local scale, the site is located within the Carrigaline Electoral Area and hence the Carrigaline Electoral Area Local Area Plan 2011 is of relevance. The relevant Local Area Plan for the area is currently being reviewed. The subject site falls within the draft Ballincollig‐Carrigaline Municipal District Local Area Plan area. Table 1: Planning Policy Context Plan Content Relevance to Subject Site/Study Area and Commentary Regional Planning Guidelines for Purpose: This Plan provides a strategic framework for the development of counties Cork Purpose: Sets guiding principles for plans lower down in the the South West Region 2010‐ and Kerry, to implement the policies of the National Spatial Strategy (NSS) at regional and planning policy hierarchy and for development management 2022 (South West Regional local level and to guide policies and provisions of county and local area plans.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Rd Workplan
    North Sea Mediterranean Third Work Plan of the European Coordinator Péter Balázs JUNE 2018 Mobility and Transport North Sea Mediterranean Core Network Corridor, Work Plan of the Coordinator June 2018 This report represents the opinion of the European Coordinator and does not prejudice the official position of the European Commission. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for any potential use, which may be made of the information contained herein. June 2018 Page 2 North Sea Mediterranean Core Network Corridor, Work Plan of the Coordinator Contents 1. Towards the North Sea Mediterranean corridor updated Work Plan ....................... 6 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 6 1.2 Road map to setting up the Third Work Plan ................................................ 7 1.3 Funding achieved through Connecting Europe Facility ..................................11 2. Characteristics of the North Sea Mediterranean Corridor ....................................13 2.1 Alignment ..............................................................................................13 2.2 Compliance with the technical infrastructure parameters of the TEN-T guidelines in 2017 ................................................................................14 2.2.1 Railway network and rail/road terminals ......................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Inspector's Report HA0053 MA0014
    Inspector’s Report HA0053 MA0014 File References 04.HA0053 – M28 Cork to Ringaskiddy Motorway Scheme 04.MA0014 – Cork to Ringaskiddy Motorway Scheme, Protected Road Scheme and Service Area 2017 Development M28 Cork to Ringaskiddy Road Project and Motorway Scheme with Service Area at Ringaskiddy Applicant Cork County Council Type of Applications HA0053 – Strategic Infrastructure Development, S51(2) Roads Act 1993 MA0014 – Local Authority Projects – M28 Motorway Scheme Project Cork to Ringaskiddy; Protected Road Scheme; and Service Area Scheme Dates of Oral Hearing 7th-10th November; 14th to 17th th st November; 28 Nov.to 1 December th th th th 24 July, 25 July, 18 October, 26 th th Date of Site Inspections October, 27 October, 11 November, HA0053 and MA0014 Inspector’s Report Page 1 of 425 13th November, 2017 Inspector Mary Kennelly Appendices Appendix 1 Summary of Observations Appendix 2 Report of Traffic and Transport Consultant appointed by the Board HA0053 and MA0014 Inspector’s Report Page 2 of 425 Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 9 2 Site Location and Description ............................................................................ 10 3 Proposed Development ..................................................................................... 11 3.1 TEN-T Core Route ...................................................................................... 11 3.2 Declassified N28 ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cork Area Strategic Plan – Strategy for Additional Economic and Population Growth - an Update
    Cork Area Strategic Plan – Strategy for Additional Economic and Population Growth - An Update Indecon International Economic Consultants, RPS and Savills HOK 1 July 2008 Contents Page Executive Summary i 1 Introduction and Background 1 1.1 Background and Context 1 1.2 The Study Area 1 1.3 Key Development Issues Facing Cork 3 1.4 Goals and Objectives 5 1.5 Phasing of CASP 7 1.6 Progress towards Achievement of CASP Goals 8 1.7 Structure of Report 15 2 Detailed Economic and Investment Strategy 16 2.1 SWOT analysis of CASP area 16 2.2 Identification of Optimal Economic Development Models 19 2.3 Proposed Sectoral Economic Development Strategy 19 3 Proposed Overall Strategic Plan 27 3.1 Introduction 27 3.2 Key Concepts 30 3.3 Housing Location 61 3.4 Additional Floorspace and Associated Land Requirements 64 3.5 Front Loading of Infrastructure and the Integrated Transport System 67 4 Phasing the Strategic Plan 127 4.1 Introduction 127 4.2 Overall Strategy 131 Contents Page 4.3 Phasing Programme for Cork City 132 4.4 Phasing Programme for Metropolitan Cork 133 4.5 Phasing Programme for Ring Towns and Rural Areas 134 5 Implementing the Strategic Plan 136 5.1 Institutional Processes 137 5.2 Marketing and Branding 144 5.3 Funding 145 5.4 Monitoring of Progress 150 ANNEXES 154 Annex 1 Glossary and Definitions 155 Annex 2 List of Submissions Made prior to Draft 156 Annex 3 List of Submissions Made post Draft 158 Annex 4 CASP Infrastructure Capital Investment Expenditure 161 Annex 5 CASP Transport Priorities 162 Annex 6 Larger Scale Maps 173 Tables &
    [Show full text]
  • Inspector's Report PA0045
    Inspector’s Report PA0045. Development Resource Recovery Centre development, comprising a Waste to Energy Facility (waste incinerator with energy recovery) for the treatment of non-hazardous and hazardous waste. The development also includes an upgrade to a section of the L2545 road; coastal protection measures on Gobby Beach; a connection to the national electricity distribution grid; the raising the ground levels in part of the site; the provision of an amenity For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. walkway along the eastern and part southern boundary of the site and associated works. Location Ringaskiddy, County Cork. Applicant Indaver Ireland. Type of Application Application to the Board pursuant to section 37E. Dates of Site Inspection 14th March 2016, 5th April 2016, 21st th April 2016, 6 September 2016 Inspector Derek Daly. 04.PA0045 An Bord Pleanála Page 1 of 144 EPA Export 20-07-2019:03:55:48 1.0 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 2.0 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 3.0 PLANNING HISTORY 4.0 POLICY CONTEXT 5.0 SUBMISSION FROM CORK COUNTY COUNCIL 6.0 SUBMISSIONS FROM PROSCRIBED AND PUBLIC BODIES 6.1 The Department of Arts Heritage and the Gaeltacht. 6.2 The Health and Safety Authority. 6.3 An Taisce. 6.4 HSE South. 6.5 Irish Water. 6.5 Southern Regional Assembly. 6.7 South Regional Waste Management Office 6.8 Transport Infrastructure Ireland. 6.9 EPA. 6.10 Department of Defence. 7.0 OBSERVER SUBMISSIONS 7.1 Public Representatives. 7.2 Organisations and Community Groups. 7.3 Other observers. For inspection purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • Cork County Development Plan Review Section 12(4) Chief Executive’S Report
    Cork County Development Plan Review Section 12(4) Chief Executive’s Report Volume II: Chief Executive’s Responses and Recommendations • June 2014 Section 12(4) Chief Executive’s Report Volume II 2014 2 Section 12(4) Chief Executive’s Report Volume II 2014 Contents Section 2(a)(i) Chief Executive’s Response to the Submissions from the Department of Environment, Community and Local Government and South West Regional Authority 4 Section 2(a)(ii) All other Submissions (by interested party A-Z) 15 Section 2(b) Chief Executive’s Response to the Planning SPC Submission 283 Section 2(c) Chief Executive’s Response to the Submissions made to Appendix G (Residential Density Proposed Changes to Electoral Area LAP Zoning Objectives) 312 3 Section 12(4) Chief Executive’s Report Volume II 2014 Section 2(a)(i): Submissions from the Department of Environment and South West Regional Authority Name of Interested Party PPU Submission Summary Principal Issues Raised Chief Executive’s Response Chief Executive’s and Unique Reference Recommendation Number Minister for the 1) Draft Plan sets out a strong and 1. Should the Draft Plan be amended to 1 to 4. See Volume 1, Section 1(b) 1 to 4. See Environment, effective development strategy. 2) provide a clearer overall framework for Core Strategy” A ”Housing Land Volume 1, Section Community and Local Recognise requirement for effective deciding on the scale, phasing and location Supply and Zoning Policy 1(b) “Core Government engagement by relevant of new development lands in Local Area Framework for LAPs” Strategy” A dCDP14/1842 infrastructure providers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ringaskiddy Port Redevelopment
    RINGASKIDDY PORT REDEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT VOLUME III b: TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION APPENDICES The sole responsibility of this publication lies with the author. The European Union is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Ringaskiddy Port Redevelopment Environmental Impact Statement ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT VOLUME III b: TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION APPENDICES CONTENTS: Appendix 8.1 Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report Appendix 8.2 Baseline Review Appendix 8.3 POC Strategic Traffic Model Appendix 8.4 Mobility Management Plan Appendix 8.5 AADT Flows Appendix 8.6 Background Traffic Growth Forecasts Appendix 8.7 Trip Generation and Distribution Appendix 8.8 Core Scenario Modelling Results Appendix 8.9 Construction Scenario Modelling Results Appendix 8.10 Core Scenario Mitigation Modelling Results Appendix 8.11 Construction Mitigation Scenario Modelling Results Appendix 8.12 Sensitivity Scenarios Modelling Results Appendix 8.13 Sensitivity Scenarios Mitigation Modelling Results Appendix 8.14 Junction Selection Report NI1004/EIS Ringaskiddy Port Redevelopment Environmental Impact Statement THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK NI1004/EIS Ringaskiddy Port Redevelopment Environmental Impact Statement APPENDIX 8.1 PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT REPORT NI1004/EIS Ringaskiddy Port Redevelopment Environmental Impact Statement THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK NI1004/EIS Ringaskiddy Preliminary Traffic Assessment Report Report for Port of Cork January 2013 N40 N28 Document Control Project
    [Show full text]