DOCSLIB.ORG

Cork County Development Plan Review Section 12(4) Chief Executive’S Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cork County Development Plan Review Section 12(4) Chief Executive’S Report Cork County Development Plan Review Section 12(4) Chief Executive’s Report Volume II: Chief Executive’s Responses and Recommendations • June 2014 Section 12(4) Chief Executive’s Report Volume II 2014 2 Section 12(4) Chief Executive’s Report Volume II 2014 Contents Section 2(a)(i) Chief Executive’s Response to the Submissions from the Department of Environment, Community and Local Government and South West Regional Authority 4 Section 2(a)(ii) All other Submissions (by interested party A-Z) 15 Section 2(b) Chief Executive’s Response to the Planning SPC Submission 283 Section 2(c) Chief Executive’s Response to the Submissions made to Appendix G (Residential Density Proposed Changes to Electoral Area LAP Zoning Objectives) 312 3 Section 12(4) Chief Executive’s Report Volume II 2014 Section 2(a)(i): Submissions from the Department of Environment and South West Regional Authority Name of Interested Party PPU Submission Summary Principal Issues Raised Chief Executive’s Response Chief Executive’s and Unique Reference Recommendation Number Minister for the 1) Draft Plan sets out a strong and 1. Should the Draft Plan be amended to 1 to 4. See Volume 1, Section 1(b) 1 to 4. See Environment, effective development strategy. 2) provide a clearer overall framework for Core Strategy” A ”Housing Land Volume 1, Section Community and Local Recognise requirement for effective deciding on the scale, phasing and location Supply and Zoning Policy 1(b) “Core Government engagement by relevant of new development lands in Local Area Framework for LAPs” Strategy” A dCDP14/1842 infrastructure providers. 3) Needs to Plan (LAPs) and show clearly how it is ”Housing Land provide clearer guidance of the overall intended to deal with any shortfall/ excess Supply and scale of development proposed in in the amount of zoned land? Zoning Policy future LAPs. 4) Clarify the current Framework for position with regard to zoning of lands 2. Should the Draft Plan be amended to LAPs” in smaller settlements. 5) Show the influence the delivery of the larger strategic quantum of zoned land required to residential and employment sites in meet the population targets set out Metropolitan Cork? for each settlement. 6) Supports the adoption of a more flexible approach 3. Should the Draft Plan be amended to to the application of housing clearly show that the supply of land density.7) Supports the approach identified is sufficient to meet the likely taken to rural housing policies which is demand for housing over the plan period? regarded as exemplar. 8) Supports the proposal to establish a fund for town 4. Should the Draft Plan be amended to centre renewable projects including help deliver the water services and the provision of better car parking. 9) transport infrastructure required? Recognises the importance of energy and in particular renewable energy as 5. Supports approach taken to Rural 5. Noted 5.No Amendment a key economic driver. 10) Plan sets Housing which is regarded as exemplar. Required out a clear policy framework for the 4 Section 12(4) Chief Executive’s Report Volume II 2014 Name of Interested Party PPU Submission Summary Principal Issues Raised Chief Executive’s Response Chief Executive’s and Unique Reference Recommendation Number future development of the wind 6. Appropriate that green infrastructure is 6. Noted. 6. No energy sector. 11) Plan needs to recognised and protected. Amendment clearly set out criteria used to identify Required. the employment hierarchy. 12) Plan displays a sensible approach to the 7. Should the Draft Plan be amended to 7. It is intended to delete ZU 3-7 7. Amendment setting of standards for car parking reword objective ZU 3-7 to better reflect (b) and to make minor changes to Required provision. 13) It is appropriate that national waste management policy? ZU 3-7 (c) to ensure that it is green infrastructure is both compliant with national waste recognised and protected. 14) Plan management policy. needs additional measures to protect biodiversity particularly in relation to 8. Can the Plan confirm whether the retail 8. The distribution of 8. No the fresh water pearl mussel figures, and related policies and objectives convenience and comparison Amendment populations in the Blackwater River. contained in the Draft Plan are consistent floorspace throughout the Required 15) Expresses concerns about Council with the population targets set out in its Metropolitan Area is based on approach to zoning and the provision proposed Core Strategy? existing market share and the of waste facilities. population targets as set out in the South West Regional Planning Guidelines. 5 Section 12(4) Chief Executive’s Report Volume II 2014 Name of Interested Party PPU Submission Summary Principal Issues Raised Chief Executive’s Response Chief Executive’s and Unique Reference Recommendation Number South West Regional Confirms that the Draft Plan is as far It is noted that the SWRA confirm Authority as practical consistent with the that the Draft Plan is as far as dCDP14/1775 Regional Planning Guidelines and practical consistent with the makes a number of recommendations South West Regional Planning to further improve the plans Guidelines. alignment with the Guidelines. RECOMMENDATION 1 – It is 1. Should the Draft Plan Core Strategy be 1 to 5. See Volume 1, Section 1(b) 1 to 5 See Volume recommended that policies and amended to provide a clearer overall “Core Strategy” A ”Housing Land 1, Section 1(b) objectives within the Core Strategy framework for deciding on the scale, Supply and Zoning Policy “Core Strategy” A and Draft Plan (in particular Chapters phasing and location of new development Framework for LAPs” ”Housing Land 14 and 15) are amended to include an lands in Local Area Plan (LAPs) and show Supply and overall implementation framework for clearly how it is intended to deal with any Zoning Policy deciding on the scale, phasing and shortfall/ excess in the amount of zoned Framework for location of new development lands in land? LAPs” Local Area Plan (LAPs). In this regard it is recommended that the Local 2. Should the Draft Plan Core Strategy be Authority clearly indicates the amount amended to influence the delivery of the of residential lands required (in larger strategic residential and employment hectares) to meet the identified need sites in Metropolitan Cork? of each settlement identified in the Core Strategy of the Draft Plan. The 3. Should the Draft Plan be amended to Local Authority is referred to the identify sufficient lands to meet the likely DECLG ‘Guidance Note on Core demand for housing over the plan period? Strategies’ which contains an illustrative example of a Core Strategy 4. Should the Draft Plan Core Strategy be table where proposed zoning and amended to help deliver the water services shortfall/excess are presented. and transport infrastructure required? RECOMMENDATION 2 – Objective ZU 2-3 of the Draft Plan states that all 5. Should the Draft Plan be amended to 6 Section 12(4) Chief Executive’s Report Volume II 2014 Name of Interested Party PPU Submission Summary Principal Issues Raised Chief Executive’s Response Chief Executive’s and Unique Reference Recommendation Number lands within a development boundary reflect the impact of population growth that is not subject to a specific zoning targets on sensitive water catchments such objective, are deemed to be zoned as the Blackwater and Cork Harbour? residential or mixed uses for the purposes of Part V of the Planning and 6. Should the Draft Plan be amended to 6. The Joint Housing Strategy 6. Amendment Development Acts. It is recommended consider housing vacancy levels? which informs the Draft Plan Required that the Local Authority should clarify contained analysis on the vacancy whether this will require information levels in the county from the data of net residential lands zoned in supplied by the Department of villages to be provided in the Core Environment for the baseline Strategy Tables. year (2012). It is intended to RECOMMENDATION 3 – For lands include additional text to explain which are identified as being surplus the Core Strategy tables. for the plan period, it is recommended that the Local Authority provide 7. Should the Draft Plan be amended to 7. It is considered that the 7. No details of their intentions to deal with ensure compliance with the SEA Directive & policies in Chapter 13 and Amendment these surplus lands during the LAP River Basin Management Plans? Objective GI 10-1 are sufficient to Required process. It is also recommended that ensure compliance with the the Local Authority should provide relevant River Basin Management details of how zoning proposals will Plans. accord with national policy that development of land shall take place 8. Should the Draft Plan be amended to 8. The intent of the social and 8. No on a phased basis. According to the consider similar social and community community objectives contained Amendment DECLG ‘Guidance Note on Core objectives to those contained in the RPG? in the SWRPG are addressed in Required Strategies’, the Core Strategy must particular in Chapters 1, 3, 4, 5 demonstrate how the level of any and 12 of the Draft Plan. excess of land or housing will be addressed. 9. Should the Draft Plan be amended to 9. It is intended to delete ZU 2-3 9. Amendment RECOMMENDATION 4 – It is provide further clarification with regard to and amend objective HOU 5-1. Required recommended that the Draft Plan objective ZU 2-3 "Housing Strategy and 7 Section 12(4) Chief Executive’s Report Volume II 2014 Name of Interested Party PPU Submission Summary Principal Issues Raised Chief Executive’s Response Chief Executive’s and Unique Reference Recommendation Number should describe how it considered Development Boundaries"? vacancy levels, unfinished housing estates and extant planning 10.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rural Housing
    County Development Plan Review Rural Housing Background Paper November 2012 Planning Policy Unit Cork County Council Rural Housing Background Paper November 2012 ii Rural Housing Background Paper November 2012 Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ii 1. Introduction 1 2. Rural Population Change 2006 – 2011 3 3. Recent Patterns of Rural Housing Development 7 4. Environmental Sensitivity and Rural Housing Pressure 25 5. Defining Areas of Strong Urban Influence 27 6. Identification of Rural Area Types 31 7. Conclusions 37 Note: Although November 2012 is the cover date on this document the data used to inform the document was largely collected in late 2011 and throughout 2012. i Rural Housing Background Paper November 2012 Executive Summary i. Terms of Reference The main outputs of this study are to: (a) Review policies for the Metropolitan Greenbelt and Rural Housing Control Zone and (b) A review of the rural housing policies applicable to the remainder of the County, based on the template put forward in the Sustainable Rural Housing Guidelines 2005. It was agreed at the Planning Policy Group Meeting of the 17th January 2012 that although the initial aim of this study is to review the rural housing policies for the Metropolitan Greenbelt, this needs to be carried out in line with the overall approach to rural housing set out in the Ministerial Guidelines. The following section outlined the agreed approach for the study which was adapted to address any emerging issues as the study progressed. The Approach of this Study is to: • Use the Sustainable Rural Housing Guidelines as a template to revise and review the current rural housing policy.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Roads and Traffic
    Indaver Ringaskiddy Resource Recovery Centre Environmental Impact Statement 7. Roads and Traffic Introduction This section of the EIS identifies and evaluates the likely significant impacts of the traffic generated by the proposed Ringaskiddy Resource Recovery Centre, both during its construction and operational phases. This section describes the existing traffic situation in the area surrounding the site and provides a description of the local road network. Existing traffic levels are quantified and existing facilities for public transport, cyclists and pedestrians are described. Brief details of the proposed development are provided and the trip generation and distribution methodologies are explained. The impact of the generated traffic on the local road network is assessed and mitigation measures which Indaver intend to include in their development proposals are investigated where necessary. It is clear from the extensive consultations which Indaver have carried out with both the local community and the statutory authorities that traffic congestion on the main N28 approaches to Ringaskiddy and to the site, and how this congestion should be managed during the peak hours, is a major concern. Indaver welcomes the recent announcement of the inclusion of the N28 upgrade and the pending implementation of the proposed improvements to the Dunkettle Interchange as part of the Government Capital Budget to 2021 announced recently, although these are not necessary for this project. While these road upgrades will facilitate the free flow of all strategic traffic when complete, Indaver also recognise that peak hour capacity on this strategic route will require ongoing management into the future to ensure that the corridor continues to have capacity at critical periods.
    [Show full text]
  • 0554 Port of Cork 3
    CORK TO THE WORLD Updated Economic Assessment of the N28 Cork to Ringaskiddy Scheme. June 2014 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements v Executive Summary vi 1. Introduction and Background 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Terms of Reference 1 1.3 Background and Economic Context 1 2. Methodology 4 2.1 Introduction 4 2.2 Consultation Programme and Primary Research 4 2.3 Analytical Methodologies 5 3. Transportation Benefits of N28 Upgrade 7 3.1 Introduction and Description of Scheme 7 3.2 Net Transportation Benefits of N28 Upgrade 8 3.3 Summary of Key Conclusions 12 4. External Connectivity and Port-related Impacts 13 4.1 Introduction 13 4.2 Context and Port Sector Trends 13 4.3 Importance of the N28 Upgrade 15 4.4 Implications of Failure to Meet Port Capacity Needs 16 4.5 Summary of Key Conclusions 20 5. Enhancement of the Ringaskiddy Industry and Research Cluster 21 5.1 Introduction 21 5.2 FDI-related Benefits of N28 Upgrade 21 5.3 Role of N28 Upgrade in Development of IMERC 25 5.4 Summary of Key Conclusions 29 6. N28 as Catalyst for Wider Regional Development 31 6.1 Introduction 31 6.2 Tourism Sector Development 31 6.3 Potential Influential Role of N28 in Development of Cork Docklands 34 6.4 Summary of Key Conclusions 36 7. Views of the Business Community 37 7.1 Introduction 37 7.2 Key Research Findings 37 8. Conclusions and Recommendations 46 8.1 Introduction 46 8.2 Sectoral Impacts of N28 Upgrade 46 8.3 Overall Conclusions and Recommendations 49 Annex 1 List of Consultees 51 Annex 2 Additional Findings from Survey of Businesses 52 i Tables, FIGures
    [Show full text]
  • Board Order ABP-308545-20
    Board Order ABP-308545-20 Planning and Development Acts 2000 to 2020 Planning Authority: Cork County Council Planning Register Reference Number: 20/05130 Appeal by Arthur and Ann Marie O’Leary of Upper Deck, Coast Road, Fountainstown, County Cork and by Michelle and Barry Manze of “Ivernia”, Coast Road, Kilmichael East, Myrtleville, County Cork against the decision made on the 7th day of October, 2020 by Cork County Council to grant subject to conditions a permission to Daniel and Stephanie Rock of O’Leary Architecture and Design of Ouvane, Rathmore Lawn, South Douglas Road, Cork in accordance with plans and particulars lodged with the said Council: Proposed Development: Alterations and extension to existing single storey dwelling house comprising alterations to the existing front facade, construction of extension for new first floor level, including terrace, and part two storey, part one storey rear extension, together with internal alterations and associated site and ancillary works at Nantasket, Coast Road, Kilmichael East, Fountainstown, County Cork. ______________________________________________________________ ABP-308545-20 An Bord Pleanála Page 1 of 6 Decision GRANT permission for the above proposed development in accordance with the said plans and particulars based on the reasons and considerations under and subject to the conditions set out below. Matters Considered In making its decision, the Board had regard to those matters to which, by virtue of the Planning and Development Acts and Regulations made thereunder, it was required
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Applications
    CORK COUNTY COUNCIL Page No: 1 PLANNING APPLICATIONS INVALID APPLICATIONS FROM 10/03/2018 TO 16/03/2018 that it is the responsibility of any person wishing to use the personal data on planning applications and decisions lists for direct marketing purposes to be satisfied that they may do so legitimately under the requirements of the Data Protection Acts 1988 and 2003 taking into account of the preferences outlined by applicants in their application FUNCTIONAL AREA: West Cork, Bandon/Kinsale, Blarney/Macroom, Ballincollig/Carrigaline, Kanturk/Mallow, Fermoy, Cobh, East Cork FILE NUMBER APPLICANTS NAME APP. TYPE DATE INVALID DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION 18/00101 Benedict Bannister Permission 14/03/2018 De molition of existing Studio of area c.23 sq.m., alterations including new windows and doors and new slated roof, and new Conservatory extension of area c. 12 sq.m, all to existing detached 3 bedroom bungalow of area c.100 sq.m. and for construction of a new detached 2 storey 3 bedroom house of area c.269 sq.m. with associated site works and landscaping, all on a site of area 0.3251 hA Rushanes Townland Glandore Co Cork 18/00103 Richard Ashen, Madeline McKeown Permission for 14/03/2018 Retention of detached domestic garage ancillary in use to main Retention dwelling house Caher Kilcrohane Bantry Co Cork 18/04474 Sinead Considine Outline Permission 13/03/2018 Construct a single storey dwelling, a garage for domestic use, a proprietary waste water treatment unit with percolation area and bored well. Garranereagh Kilbrittain Co. Cork 18/04476 Ger Cahill Permission 13/03/2018 Dwellinghouse, detached domestic garage with associated site Create date and time: 26/03/2018 09:43:19 CORK COUNTY COUNCIL Page No: 2 works Bridestown Kildinan Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Cork County Grit Locations
    Cork County Grit Locations North Cork Engineer's Area Location Charleville Charleville Public Car Park beside rear entrance to Library Long’s Cross, Newtownshandrum Turnpike Doneraile (Across from Park entrance) Fermoy Ballynoe GAA pitch, Fermoy Glengoura Church, Ballynoe The Bottlebank, Watergrasshill Mill Island Carpark on O’Neill Crowley Quay RC Church car park, Caslelyons The Bottlebank, Rathcormac Forestry Entrance at Castleblagh, Ballyhooley Picnic Site at Cork Road, Fermoy beyond former FCI factory Killavullen Cemetery entrance Forestry Entrance at Ballynageehy, Cork Road, Killavullen Mallow Rahan old dump, Mallow Annaleentha Church gate Community Centre, Bweeng At Old Creamery Ballyclough At bottom of Cecilstown village Gates of Council Depot, New Street, Buttevant Across from Lisgriffin Church Ballygrady Cross Liscarroll-Kilbrin Road Forge Cross on Liscarroll to Buttevant Road Liscarroll Community Centre Car Park Millstreet Glantane Cross, Knocknagree Kiskeam Graveyard entrance Kerryman’s Table, Kilcorney opposite Keim Quarry, Millstreet Crohig’s Cross, Ballydaly Adjacent to New Housing Estate at Laharn Boherbue Knocknagree O Learys Yard Boherbue Road, Fermoyle Ball Alley, Banteer Lyre Village Ballydesmond Church Rd, Opposite Council Estate Mitchelstown Araglin Cemetery entrance Mountain Barracks Cross, Araglin Ballygiblin GAA Pitch 1 Engineer's Area Location Ballyarthur Cross Roads, Mitchelstown Graigue Cross Roads, Kildorrery Vacant Galtee Factory entrance, Ballinwillin, Mitchelstown Knockanevin Church car park Glanworth Cemetery
    [Show full text]
  • Roinn Cosanta. Bureau of Military History, 1913-21
    ROINN COSANTA. BUREAU OF MILITARY HISTORY, 1913-21 STATEMENT BY WITNESS. DOCUMENT NO. W.S. 1603. Witness Michael J. Crowley, Lisieux, Enniscrone, Co. Sligo. Identity. Bgde. Staff Officer and member of Cork 111 Bgde. Active Service Unit. Subject. Activities of Cork 111. Bgde., I.R.A., & Active Service Unit 1917-21. Conditions, if any, Stipulated by Witness. Nil. S.2919. File No FormBS.M.2 STATEMENT BY MICHAEL CROWLEY Lisieux. Enniscrone, Co. Sligo. (Brigade Engineer Cork III Brigade). I was born at Kilbrittain, Co. Cork, in the year 1897., being the youngest of a family of six children comprising four boys and two girls. In 1916 I was a student at Blackrock College, Dublin, and, prior to the Easter Rising, the sight of Irish soldiers in their green uniforms became familiar to us on the occasions of our walks, usiil1y taken in Dun Laoire, or on 'Free' days when we went to the city. Such sights inspired a section of the students, (rather small) who were nationally minded to form a Volunteer company within the college walls, the activities of which were confined to close order drill. I was a member of this group, but as far as I am aware, we had no contact with the Volunteer organisation; but our action indicated our knowledge of and sympathy with the resurgent spirit of the time. Our lack of contact with the Volunteers was evidenced by the fact that the Rising came as a. complete surprise to our group. A few of us discussed the possibility of getting to Dublin on or about the second day of hostilities, but found the way barred by British military units at Booterstown.
    [Show full text]
  • VOLUME 2 Specific Objectives: 2 Heritage and Amenity Specific Objectives: Heritage and Amenity
    CORK County Development Plan 2003 VOLUME 2 Specific Objectives: 2 Heritage and Amenity Specific Objectives: Heritage and Amenity Contents of Volume 2 CHAPTER 1: RECORD OF PROTECTED STRUCTURES 1 CHAPTER 2: ARCHITECTURAL CONSERVATION AREAS 77 Volume 1: CHAPTER 3: NATURE CONSERVATION AREAS 81 Overall Strategy & Main Policy Material 3.1 Proposed Natural Heritage Areas 82 Sets out the general objectives of 3.2 Candidate Special Areas of Conservation 90 the Development Plan under a range of headings together with 3.3 Special Protection Areas 92 the planning principles that underpin them. 3.4 Areas of Geological Interest 93 Volume 2: CHAPTER 4: SCENIC ROUTES 99 Specific Objectives: Heritage and Amenity Sets out, in detail, a range of specific heritage and amenity objectives of the Development Plan, with particular attention to the Record of Protected Structures. Volume 3: Specific Zoning Objectives: Main Settlements Sets out the specific zoning objectives for 31 main settlements in County Cork. The overall zoning approach as well as general context material is given for each settlement. Volume 4: Maps The map volume contains six main sets of maps: Heritage & Scenic Amenity; Metropolitan Cork Green Belt; Rural Housing Control Zone; Landscape Character Areas and Types Map; Architectural Conservation Areas and Zoning Maps for the 31 Main Settlements. Issue 1: February 2003 CORK County Development Plan iii Chapter 1 Record of Protected Structures he overall planning policy for the protection of Tstructures is set out in Chapter 7 (Environment & Heritage) of Volume 1. For the Record of Protected Structures (RPS), the key objectives are stated as follows: ENV 5-1(a): It is an objective to seek the 1.1 Record of Protected protection of all structures within the county Structures which are of special architectural, historical, archaeological, artistic, cultural, scientific, social or technical interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Cork City and County Archives Index to Listed Collections with Scope and Content
    Cork City and County Archives Index to Listed Collections with Scope and Content A State of the Ref. IE CCCA/U73 Date: 1769 Level: item Extent: 32pp Diocese of Cloyne Scope and Content: Photocopy of MS. volume 'A State of The Diocese of Cloyne With Respect to the Several Parishes... Containing The State of the Churches, the Glebes, Patrons, Proxies, Taxations in the King's Books, Crown – Rents, and the Names of the Incumbents, with Other Observations, In Alphabetical Order, Carefully collected from the Visitation Books and other Records preserved in the Registry of that See'. Gives ecclesiastical details of the parishes of Cloyne; lists the state of each parish and outlines the duties of the Dean. (Copy of PRONI T2862/5) Account Book of Ref. IE CCCA/SM667 Date: c.1865 - 1875 Level: fonds Extent: 150pp Richard Lee Scope and Content: Account ledger of Richard Lee, Architect and Builder, 7 North Street, Skibbereen. Included are clients’ names, and entries for materials, labourers’ wages, and fees. Pages 78 to 117 have been torn out. Clients include the Munster Bank, Provincial Bank, F McCarthy Brewery, Skibbereen Town Commissioners, Skibbereen Board of Guardians, Schull Board of Guardians, George Vickery, Banduff Quarry, Rev MFS Townsend of Castletownsend, Mrs Townsend of Caheragh, Richard Beamish, Captain A Morgan, Abbeystrewry Church, Beecher Arms Hotel, and others. One client account is called ‘Masonic Hall’ (pp30-31) [Lee was a member of Masonic Lodge no.15 and was responsible for the building of the lodge room]. On page 31 is written a note regarding the New Testament. Account Book of Ref.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Weekly Lists Further Info Received and Validated Applications
    CORK COUNTY COUNCIL Page No: 1 PLANNING APPLICATIONS FURTHER INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM 10/10/2020 TO 16/10/2020 that it is the responsibility of any person wishing to use the personal data on planning applications and decisions lists for direct marketing purposes to be satisfied that they may do so legitimately under the requirements of the Data Protection Acts 1988 and 2003 taking into account of the preferences outlined by applicants in their application FUNCTIONAL AREA: West Cork, Bandon/Kinsale, Blarney/Macroom, Ballincollig/Carrigaline, Kanturk/Mallow, Fermoy, Cobh, East Cork FILE NUMBER APPLICANTS NAME APP. TYPE DATE INVALID DATE RECEIVED DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION 19/05681 Glennon Brothers Cork Ltd Permission 15/10/2020 To demolish an existing two storey farm out-building and to demolish a fuel tank storage shed, permission is sought to construct a new office building over three floors including a 24 space external car park, permission to erect new external lighting to proposed carpark, permission to construct a single storey extension to an existing single storey plant room and permission is sought to clad the external elevations of the plantroom with timber cladding, permission to realign the perimeter fence to facilitate the proposed office building and amend the existing perimeter fence to the front of the site to increase the road side hard stand area, permission is sought to construct a new fuel tank storage bund for the storage of fuel tanks, permission to erect new signage to the building and office entrance, and all associated landscaping and site works. Glennon Brothers Sawmill, Farran South Fermoy Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Cork County Council Annual Report 2019
    Cork County Council Annual Report 2019 Contents 1. Message from Cllr. Ian Doyle, Mayor of the County of Cork & Tim Lucey, Chief 1 Executive of Cork County Council 2. Public Representatives 3 3. Municipal District Details 11 4. Committee & Subsidiary Body Membership 12 5. Boundary Alteration 16 6. Safety, Health & Welfare at Work 17 7. Roads, Transportation & Safety 18 8. Water Services & County Engineer’s Department 21 9. Housing 23 10. Environment 26 11. Planning 32 12. Fire & Building Control 38 13. Economic Development, Enterprise & Tourism 43 14. Finance 51 15. Municipal District Operations & Rural Development 55 16. Information & Communications Technology 89 17. Corporate Services 92 18. Strategic Policy Committees (SPCs) 102 19. Appendices: 102 Appendix 1: Members’ Expenses 2019 Appendix 2: Conference Attendance 2019 Appendix 3: Training Conference Attendance 2019 Appendix 4: Other Travel 2019 Appendix 5: Annual Service Delivery Plan 1. Message from Cllr. Ian Doyle, Mayor of the County of Cork & Tim Lucey, Chief Executive of Cork County Council Mayor of the County of Cork Chief Executive of Cork County Council Cllr. Ian Doyle Mr. Tim Lucey We are pleased to present herein Cork County Council’s Annual Report 2019, which outlines the vast range of policies, programmes, services and activities undertaken by the Council throughout the year. As a Council, we continue to work with the public to further develop the economic, social, physical, environmental and cultural landscape of Cork County. Our citizens, communities and businesses are at the very core of our organisation. Supporting and providing assistance to these vital stakeholders is, and always will be, our priority.
    [Show full text]
  • Cork County Development Plan 2009
    CORK COUNTY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2009 Second Edition Volume 2 Specific Objectives: 2 Heritage and Amenity Cork County Council Planning Policy Unit Technical Information: The text volumes of this plan have been designed and laid out using Microsoft Word™ software. Maps in Volume three have Cork County Council been prepared by the staff of the Planning Policy Unit using Planning Policy Unit a MapInfo™ GIS platform. The Compact Disc CD version was developed by the Planning Policy Unit using Adobe® Acrobat ® Distiller™ 5.0. Copyright: Cork County Council 2009. All rights reserved. Map base: Ordnance Survey of Ireland Permit Number 7634 © Ordnance Survey Ireland and Government of Ireland. All rights reserved. This Development Plan was printed on 100% Recycled Paper CORK County Development Plan 2009 2nd Edition CORK County Development Plan i 2009 Second Edition, Jan 2012 Volume 2 Specific Objectives Heritage and Amenity ii Volume 2: Specific Objectives: Heritage and Amenity Contents of Volume 2: Chapter 1: Record of Protected Structures 1 THE DEVELOMENT PLAN IS PRESENTED IN THREE VOLUMES: Chapter 2: Architectural Conservation Areas 69 Volume 1: Overall Strategy and Main Chapter 3: Nature Conservation Areas 73 Policy Material 3.1 Nature Heritage Areas 74 Sets out the general objectives of the Development Plan under 3.2 Proposed Natural Heritage Areas 75 a range of headings together with the planning principles that 3.3 Candidate Special Areas of Conservation 82 underpin them. 3.4 Special Protection Areas and Proposed Volume 2: Specific Objectives: Special Protection Areas 84 Heritage and Amenity 3.5 Areas of Geological Interest 85 Sets out, in detail, a range of specific heritage and amenity objectives of the Development Plan, with particular attention to Chapter 4: Scenic Routes 91 the Record of Protected Structures.
    [Show full text]