DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 6: Invasive Plant Species

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix 6: Invasive Plant Species USDA Forest Service Understanding i-Tree – Appendix 6: Invasive Plant Species APPENDIX 6 Invasive Plant Species The following is a list of invasive tree and shrub species by state that are included in i-Tree database (version 6). Each list of invasive species is followed by the reference of the source which were obtained circa 2014. Some of the Web addresses are no longer working; some have been relocated to alternative sites. State-specific invasive species lists will be updated in the future. Alabama Ailanthus altissima Lonicera japonica Poncirus trifoliate Albizia julibrissin Lonicera maackii Pyrus calleryana Ardisia crenata Lonicera morrowii Rosa bracteata Cinnamomum camphora Lonicera x bella Rosa multiflora Elaeagnus pungens Mahonia bealei Triadica sebifera Elaeagnus umbellata Melia azedarach Vernicia fordii Ligustrum japonicum Nandina domestica Wisteria sinensis Ligustrum lucidum Paulownia tomentosa Ligustrum sinense Polygonum cuspidatum Alabama Invasive Plant Council. 2007. 2007 plant list. Athens, GA: Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health, Southeast Exotic Pest Plant Council. http://www.se-eppc.org/ alabama/2007plantlist.pdf Alaska Alnus glutinosa Lonicera tatarica Sorbus aucuparia Caragana arborescens Polygonum cuspidatum Cytisus scoparius Prunus padus Alaska National Heritage Program. 2014. Non-Native plant data. Anchorage, AK: University of Alaska Anchorage. http://aknhp.uaa.alaska.edu/botany/akepic/non-native-plant-species- list/#content Arizona Alhagi maurorum Rhus lancea Tamarix parviflora Elaeagnus angustifolia Tamarix aphylla Tamarix ramosissima Euryops multifidus Tamarix chinensis Ulmus pumila Arizona Wildland Invasive Plant Working Group. 2005. Invasive non-native plants that threaten wildlands in Arizona. Phoenix, AZ: Southwest Vegetation Management Association https:// www.swvma.org/wp-content/uploads/Invasive-Non-Native-Plants-that-Threaten-Wildlands-in- Arizona.pdf (Accessed Sept 3. 2019) Appendix 6 in: Nowak, David J. 2020. Understanding i-Tree: Summary of programs and methods. General Technical Report NRS-200. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. https://doi. org/10.2737/NRS-GTR-200-Appendix6 1 USDA Forest Service Understanding i-Tree – Appendix 6: Invasive Plant Species Arkansas Ailanthus altissima Lonicera japonica Pyrus calleryana Albizia julibrissin Lonicera maackii Rhamnus cathartica Baccharis halimifolia Lonicera morrowii Rosa multiflora Euonymus fortunei Melia azedarach Triadica sebifera Ligustrum lucidum Nandina domestica Photinia serratifolia Ligustrum sinense Paulownia tomentosa Wisteria sinensis Lonicera fragrantissima Poncirus trifoliata Wisteria floribunda Jardine, J.; Witsell, T. Working list of non-native invasive plant species of concern to natural areas in Arkansas. Arkansas Native Plant Society. http://www.deltic.com/hunting/ANPS%20 INVASIVES%20LIST.pdf California Ailanthus altissima Genista monspessulana Tamarix parviflora Carpobrotus edulis Polygonum cuspidatum Tamarix ramosissima Cytisus scoparius Ricinus communis Triadica sebifera Elaeagnus angustifolia Schinus molle Ulex europaeus Eucalyptus globulus Schinus terebinthifolius California Invasive Species Advisory Committee. 2010. The California invasive species list. Sacramento, CA: Invasive Species Council of California. http://www.iscc.ca.gov/docs/ CaliforniaInvasiveSpeciesList.pdf Colorado Alhagi maurorum Tamarix chinensis Tamarix ramosissima Elaeagnus angustifolia Tamarix parviflora Colorado Weed Management Association. 2012. Colorado’s noxious weed list. Arvada, CO: Colorado Weed Management Association. https://cwma.org/weed-information/weed-list/ Connecticut Acer ginnala Frangula alnus Paulownia tomentosa Acer platanoides Ligustrum vulgare Polygonum cuspidatum Acer pseudoplatanus Ligustrum obtusifolium Populus alba Ailanthus altissima Ligustrum ovalifolium Rhamnus cathartica Amorpha fruticose Lonicera japonica Robinia pseudoacacia Berberis thunbergii Lonicera maackii Rosa multiflora Berberis vulgaris Lonicera morrowii Rosa rugosa Elaeagnus angustifolia Lonicera tatarica Rubus phoenicolasius Elaeagnus umbellate Lonicera x bella Euonymus alatus Lonicera xylosteum Connecticut Invasive Plant Working Group. 2013. Invasive plant list. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut. http://cipwg.uconn.edu/invasive_plant_list/ 2 USDA Forest Service Understanding i-Tree – Appendix 6: Invasive Plant Species Delaware Acer platanoides Ligustrum vulgare Polygonum cuspidatum Acer pseudoplatanus Lonicera japonica Rhodotypos scandens Ailanthus altissima Lonicera maackii Rosa multiflora Berberis thunbergii Lonicera morrowii Rubus phoenicolasius Elaeagnus umbellata Lonicera tatarica Wisteria floribunda Euonymus alatus Pinus thunbergiana McAvoy, W.A. 2001. Invasive plant species in Delaware. Dover, DE: Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control. http://www.dnrec.state.de.us/fw/invasive.htm. Florida Adenanthera pavonina Elaeagnus pungens Pittosporum pentandrum Albizia julibrissin Eugenia uniflora Psidium cattleianum Albizia lebbeck Ficus altissima Psidium guajava Alstonia macrophylla Ficus thonningii Ptychosperma elegans Ardisia crenata Flacourtia indica Rhodomyrtus tomentosus Ardisia elliptica Hibiscus tiliaceus Ricinus communis Arecastrum romanzoffianum Jasminum sambac Schefflera actinophylla Bauhinia variegata Lantana camara Schinus terebinthifolius Bischofia javanica Leucaena leucocephala Solanum torvum Broussonetia papyrifera Ligustrum lucidum Stachytarpheta cayennensis Calophyllum antillanum Ligustrum sinense Syagrus romanzoffiana Casuarina cunninghamiana Livistona chinensis Syzygium cumini Casuarina equisetifolia Lonicera japonica Syzygium jambos Casuarina glauca Manilkara zapota Terminalia muelleri Cecropia palmata Melaleuca quinquenervia Terminalia catappa Cestrum diurnum Melia azedarach Thespesia populnea Chamaedorea seifrizii Mimosa pellita Triadica sebifera Cinnamomum camphora Murraya exotica Vernicia fordii Colubrina asiatica Nandina domestica Vitex trifolia Cupaniopsis anacardioides Paederia foetida Washingtonia robusta Dalbergia sissoo Phoenix reclinata Wisteria sinensis Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council. 2007. Florida EPPC’s 2007 invasive plant species list. Athens, GA: Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health, Southeast Exotic Pest Plant Council. https://www.fleppc.org/list/2007/07list.htm 3 USDA Forest Service Understanding i-Tree – Appendix 6: Invasive Plant Species Georgia Ailanthus altissima Ligustrum japonicum Paulownia tomentosa Albizia julibrissin Ligustrum lucidum Polygonum cuspidatum Ardisia crenata Ligustrum sinense Poncirus trifoliata Berberis thunbergii Lonicera fragrantissima Pyrus calleryana Broussonetia papyrifera Lonicera japonica Rosa multiflora Cinnamomum camphora Lonicera maackii Spiraea japonica Elaeagnus pungens Mahonia bealei Tamarix gallica Elaeagnus umbellata Melia azedarach Triadica sebifera Euonymus fortunei Morus alba Vernicia fordii Hibiscus syriacus Nandina domestica Wisteria sinensis Lantana camara Paederia foetida Georgia Exotic Pest Plant Council. 2006. List of non-native invasive plants in Georgia. Athens, GA: Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health, Southeast Exotic Pest Plant Council. https://www.gaeppc.org/list/ Hawaii Acacia confusa Elaeagnus umbellata Photinia davidiana Ardisia crenata Eriobotrya japonica Pimenta dioica Ardisia elliptica Ficus thonningii Pimenta racemosa Bocconia frutescens Fuchsia boliviana Pinus patula Buddleja davidii Fuchsia magellanica Piper auritum Buddleja madagascariensis Fuchsia paniculata Pittosporum pentandrum Caesalpinia decapetala Grevillea robusta Pittosporum undulatum Carmona retusa Lantana camara Pittosporum viridiflorum Cestrum diurnum Leptospermum scoparium Prosopis juliflora Cestrum nocturnum Ligustrum lucidum Psidium cattleianum Chrysophyllum oliviforme Ligustrum sinense Pyracantha angustifolia Cinnamomum burmannii Lonicera japonica Rhodomyrtus tomentosus Citharexylum caudatum Medinilla venosa Schinus molle Citharexylum spinosum Melaleuca quinquenervia Schinus terebinthifolius Clerodendrum chinense Melastoma candidum Spathodea campanulata Clerodendrum macrostegium Melastoma sanguineum Terminalia catappa Clusia rosea Melia azedarach Tetrazygia bicolor Conocarpus erectus Miconia calvescens Tibouchina granulosa Cotoneaster pannosus Montanoa hibiscifolia Tibouchina urvilleana Cupaniopsis anacardioides Morella faya Ulex europaeus Cyathea cooperi Ochna thomasiana Schefflera actinophylla Dillenia suffruticosa Olea europaea Duranta erecta Pereskia aculeata Hawaii State Alien Species Coordinator. 2012. Hawaii’s most invasive horticultural plants. Honolulu, HI: Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Forestry and Wildlife. http://www.gchonolulu.org/FlowerShow2012/HORTICULTURAL%20PLANTS%20Invasive.PDF 4 USDA Forest Service Understanding i-Tree – Appendix 6: Invasive Plant Species Idaho Alhagi maurorum Prosopis calingastana Prosopis palmeri Cytisus scoparius Prosopis campestris Prosopis reptans Cytisus striatus Prosopis castellanosii Prosopis rojasiana Genista monspessulana Prosopis denudans Prosopis ruizlealii Lycium ferocissimum Prosopis elata Prosopis ruscifolia Melaleuca quinquenervia Prosopis farcta Prosopis sericantha Melastoma malabathricum Prosopis ferox Prosopis strombulifera Prosopis alpataco Prosopis fiebrigii Prosopis torquata Prosopis argentina Prosopis hassleri Prosopis velutina Prosopis articulata Prosopis humilis Spartium junceum Prosopis burkartii Prosopis kuntzei Tamarix ramosissima Prosopis caldenia Prosopis pallida USDA Natural Resources Conservation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Overcoming the Challenges of Tamarix Management with Diorhabda Carinulata Through the Identification and Application of Semioche
    OVERCOMING THE CHALLENGES OF TAMARIX MANAGEMENT WITH DIORHABDA CARINULATA THROUGH THE IDENTIFICATION AND APPLICATION OF SEMIOCHEMICALS by Alexander Michael Gaffke A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ecology and Environmental Sciences MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana May 2018 ©COPYRIGHT by Alexander Michael Gaffke 2018 All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project would not have been possible without the unconditional support of my family, Mike, Shelly, and Tony Gaffke. I must thank Dr. Roxie Sporleder for opening my world to the joy of reading. Thanks must also be shared with Dr. Allard Cossé, Dr. Robert Bartelt, Dr. Bruce Zilkowshi, Dr. Richard Petroski, Dr. C. Jack Deloach, Dr. Tom Dudley, and Dr. Dan Bean whose previous work with Tamarix and Diorhabda carinulata set the foundations for this research. I must express my sincerest gratitude to my Advisor Dr. David Weaver, and my committee: Dr. Sharlene Sing, Dr. Bob Peterson and Dr. Dan Bean for their guidance throughout this project. To Megan Hofland and Norma Irish, thanks for keeping me sane. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................1 Tamarix ............................................................................................................................1 Taxonomy ................................................................................................................1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Landscaping and Gardening with Native Plants in Georgia's Coastal
    Dry woodlands with scattered canopy trees WHAT ARE NATIVE PLANTS? often support a profusion of fall blooming & Native Plants, species that grew naturally in this wildflowers such as sunflowers, goldenrods, region prior to the colonial era, are uniquely G with and blazing stars. The upland forest with adapted to local conditions. They are suited to both the highest soil moisture occurs on slopes the physical and biological conditions of their native Native Plants where resistance to fire allows a variety of areas. trees such as American beech, white oak, BENEFITS OF NATIVES Georgia’s spruce pine, and southern magnolia to Promote biodiversity grow, as well as shrubs like Carolina Lower landscape & garden maintenance once Coastal buckthorn, needle palm, red buckeye, horse established by reducing the need for fertilizer, sugar, fringe tree, and native azaleas. pesticides and watering. Where soils have higher moisture and Foster appreciation of our natural mineral levels, the ground layer is rich and heritage and the beauty of our native reminiscent of the Southern Appalachians landscape with spring flowering plants like bloodroot, Native flora provide food and shelter tailored May apple, trout lily, doll’s eyes and to wildlife Solomon’s seal. By maintaining natural habitats and mending Coastal Plain of G LOWLANDS AND WETLANDS are areas those that are fragmented, you can make a Climate Zone: 8B Eco-regions 65 - 75 where the soil is inundated or saturated for a difference whether working at the landscape portion of each year, and include both riverine level or planting in containers. THE COASTAL PLAIN OF GEORGIA in this BASICS FOR USING NATIVES and isolated wetlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Caragana Or Siberian Peashrub
    Caragana or Siberian Peashrub slide 5a 400% slide 5b 360% slide 5d slide 5c 360% 360% III-7 Caragana or Environmental Requirements Siberian Peashrub Soils Soil Texture - Adapted to a wide range of soils. (Caragana Soil pH - 5.0 to 8.0. arborescens) Windbreak Suitability Group - 1, 1K, 3, 4, 4C, 5, 6D, 6G, 8, 9C, 9L. General Description Cold Hardiness USDA Zone 2. Drought tolerant legume, long-lived, alkaline-tolerant, tall shrub native to Siberia. Ability to withstand extreme cold Water and dryness. Major windbreak species. Drought tolerant. Does not perform well on very wet or very dry sandy soils. Leaves and Buds Bud Arrangement - Alternate. Light Bud Color - Light brown, chaffy in nature. Full sun. Bud Size - 1/8 inch, weakly imbricate. Leaf Type and Shape - Pinnately-compound, 8 to 12 Uses leaflets per leaf. Conservation/Windbreaks Leaf Margins - Entire. Medium to tall shrub for farmstead and field windbreaks Leaf Surface - Pubescent in early spring, later glabrescent. and highway beautification. Leaf Length - 1½ to 3 inches; leaflets 1/2 to 1 inch. Wildlife Leaf Width - 1 to 2 inches; leaflets 1/3 to 2/3 inch. Used for nesting by several species of songbirds. Food Leaf Color - Light-green, become dark green in summer; source for hummingbirds. yellow fall color. Agroforestry Products Flowers and Fruits No known products. Flower Type - Small, pea-like. Flower Color - Showy yellow in spring. Urban/Recreational Fruit Type - Pod, with multiple seeds. Pods open with a Screening and border, ornamental flowers in spring. popping sound when ripe. Cultivated Varieties Fruit Color - Brown when mature.
    [Show full text]
  • Lonicera Spp
    Species: Lonicera spp. http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/shrub/lonspp/all.html SPECIES: Lonicera spp. Choose from the following categories of information. Introductory Distribution and occurrence Botanical and ecological characteristics Fire ecology Fire effects Fire case studies Management considerations References INTRODUCTORY SPECIES: Lonicera spp. AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION FEIS ABBREVIATION SYNONYMS NRCS PLANT CODE COMMON NAMES TAXONOMY LIFE FORM FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS OTHER STATUS AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION: Munger, Gregory T. 2005. Lonicera spp. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [2007, September 24]. FEIS ABBREVIATIONS: LONSPP LONFRA LONMAA LONMOR LONTAT LONXYL LONBEL SYNONYMS: None NRCS PLANT CODES [172]: LOFR LOMA6 LOMO2 LOTA LOXY 1 of 67 9/24/2007 4:44 PM Species: Lonicera spp. http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/shrub/lonspp/all.html LOBE COMMON NAMES: winter honeysuckle Amur honeysuckle Morrow's honeysuckle Tatarian honeysuckle European fly honeysuckle Bell's honeysuckle TAXONOMY: The currently accepted genus name for honeysuckle is Lonicera L. (Caprifoliaceae) [18,36,54,59,82,83,93,133,161,189,190,191,197]. This report summarizes information on 5 species and 1 hybrid of Lonicera: Lonicera fragrantissima Lindl. & Paxt. [36,82,83,133,191] winter honeysuckle Lonicera maackii Maxim. [18,27,36,54,59,82,83,131,137,186] Amur honeysuckle Lonicera morrowii A. Gray [18,39,54,60,83,161,186,189,190,197] Morrow's honeysuckle Lonicera tatarica L. [18,38,39,54,59,60,82,83,92,93,157,161,186,190,191] Tatarian honeysuckle Lonicera xylosteum L.
    [Show full text]
  • Legumes of the North-Central States: C
    LEGUMES OF THE NORTH-CENTRAL STATES: C-ALEGEAE by Stanley Larson Welsh A Dissertation Submitted, to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Subject: Systematic Botany Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy. Signature was redacted for privacy. artment Signature was redacted for privacy. Dean of Graduat College Iowa State University Of Science and Technology Ames, Iowa I960 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii INTRODUCTION 1 HISTORICAL ACCOUNT 3 MATERIALS AND METHODS 8 TAXONOMIC AND NOMENCLATURE TREATMENT 13 REFERENCES 158 APPENDIX A 176 APPENDIX B 202 iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer wishes to express his deep gratitude to Professor Duane Isely for assistance in the selection of the problem and for the con­ structive criticisms and words of encouragement offered throughout the course of this investigation. Support through the Iowa Agricultural Experiment Station and through the Industrial Science Research Institute made possible the field work required in this problem. Thanks are due to the curators of the many herbaria consulted during this investigation. Special thanks are due the curators of the Missouri Botanical Garden, U. S. National Museum, University of Minnesota, North Dakota Agricultural College, University of South Dakota, University of Nebraska, and University of Michigan. The cooperation of the librarians at Iowa State University is deeply appreciated. Special thanks are due Dr. G. B. Van Schaack of the Missouri Botanical Garden library. His enthusiastic assistance in finding rare botanical volumes has proved invaluable in the preparation of this paper. To the writer's wife, Stella, deepest appreciation is expressed. Her untiring devotion, work, and cooperation have made this work possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quantitative Importance of Stemflow: an Evaluation of Past Research and Results from a Study in Lodgepole Pine (Pinus Contorta Var
    THE QUANTITATIVE IMPORTANCE OF STEMFLOW: AN EVALUATION OF PAST RESEARCH AND RESULTS FROM A STUDY IN LODGEPOLE PINE (PINUS CONTORTA VAR. LATIFOLIA) STANDS IN SOUTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA by Adam Jon McKee B.A. Thompson Rivers University, 2008 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE (ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE) Thesis examining committee: Darryl Carlyle-Moses (Ph.D.), Thesis Supervisor, Assistant Professor, Dept. of Geography, Thompson Rivers University Karl Larsen (Ph.D.), Committee Member, Associate Professor, Dept. of Natural Resource Sciences, Thompson Rivers University Rita Winkler (Ph.D., R.P.F.), Committee Member, Adjunct Professor, Dept. of Natural Resource Sciences and Research Hydrologist, BC Ministry of Forests and Range Delphis F. Levia (Ph.D.), External Examiner, Associate Professor, Depts. of Geography & Plant and Soil Science, University of Delaware Spring Convocation 2011 Thompson Rivers University © Adam Jon McKee, 2010 Thesis Supervisory Committee ________________________ Dr. Darryl Carlyle-Moses, Supervisor ________________________ Dr. Karl Larsen, Committee Member ________________________ Dr. Rita Winkler, Committee Member This thesis by Adam Jon McKee was defended successfully in an oral examination on December 9, 2010 by a committee comprising: ________________________ Dr. Delphis F. Levia, External Examiner ________________________ Dr. Darryl Carlyle-Moses, Supervisor ________________________ Dr. Karl Larsen, Committee Member ________________________ Dr. Rita Winkler, Committee Member ii ________________________ Dr. Lauchlan Fraser, Chair/Coordinator of Graduate Program Committee ________________________ Dr. Tom Dickinson, Dean of Science ________________________ Dr. Peter Tsigaris, Chair of the Examining Committee This thesis is accepted in its present form by the Office of the Associate Vice President, Research and Graduate Studies as satisfying the thesis requirements for the degree Master of Science, Environmental Science.
    [Show full text]
  • Nursery Price List
    Lincoln-Oakes Nurseries 3310 University Drive • Bismarck, ND 58504 Nursery Seed Price List 701-223-8575 • [email protected] The following seed is in stock or will be collected and available for 2010 or spring 2011 PENDING CROP, all climatic zone 3/4 collections from established plants in North Dakota except where noted. Acer ginnala - 18.00/lb d.w Cornus racemosa - 19.00/lb Amur Maple Gray dogwood Acer tataricum - 15.00/lb d.w Cornus alternifolia - 21.00/lb Tatarian Maple Pagoda dogwood Aesculus glabra (ND, NE) - 3.95/lb Cornus stolonifera (sericea) - 30.00/lb Ohio Buckeye – collected from large well performing Redosier dogwood Trees in upper midwest Amorpha canescens - 90.00/lb Leadplant 7.50/oz Amorpha fruiticosa - 10.50/lb False Indigo – native wetland restoration shrub Aronia melanocarpa ‘McKenzie” - 52.00/lb Black chokeberry - taller form reaching 6-8 ft in height, glossy foliage, heavy fruit production, Corylus cornuta (partial husks) - 16.00/lb NRCS release Beaked hazelnut/Native hazelnut (Inquire) Caragana arborescens - 16.00/lb Cotoneaster integerrimus ‘Centennial’ - 32.00/lb Siberian peashrub European cotoneaster – NRCS release, 6-10’ in height, bright red fruit Celastrus scandens (true) (Inquire) - 58.00/lb American bittersweet, no other contaminating species in area Crataegus crus-galli - 22.00/lb Cockspur hawthorn, seed from inermis Crataegus mollis ‘Homestead’ arnoldiana-24.00/lb Arnold hawthorn – NRCS release Crataegus mollis - 19.50/lb Downy hawthorn Elaeagnus angustifolia - 9.00/lb Russian olive Elaeagnus commutata
    [Show full text]
  • National Wetlands Inventory Map Report for Quinault Indian Nation
    National Wetlands Inventory Map Report for Quinault Indian Nation Project ID(s): R01Y19P01: Quinault Indian Nation, fiscal year 2019 Project area The project area (Figure 1) is restricted to the Quinault Indian Nation, bounded by Grays Harbor Co. Jefferson Co. and the Olympic National Park. Appendix A: USGS 7.5-minute Quadrangles: Queets, Salmon River West, Salmon River East, Matheny Ridge, Tunnel Island, O’Took Prairie, Thimble Mountain, Lake Quinault West, Lake Quinault East, Taholah, Shale Slough, Macafee Hill, Stevens Creek, Moclips, Carlisle. • < 0. Figure 1. QIN NWI+ 2019 project area (red outline). Source Imagery: Citation: For all quads listed above: See Appendix A Citation Information: Originator: USDA-FSA-APFO Aerial Photography Field Office Publication Date: 2017 Publication place: Salt Lake City, Utah Title: Digital Orthoimagery Series of Washington Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: raster digital data Other_Citation_Details: 1-meter and 1-foot, Natural Color and NIR-False Color Collateral Data: . USGS 1:24,000 topographic quadrangles . USGS – NHD – National Hydrography Dataset . USGS Topographic maps, 2013 . QIN LiDAR DEM (3 meter) and synthetic stream layer, 2015 . Previous National Wetlands Inventories for the project area . Soil Surveys, All Hydric Soils: Weyerhaeuser soil survey 1976, NRCS soil survey 2013 . QIN WET tables, field photos, and site descriptions, 2016 to 2019, Janice Martin, and Greg Eide Inventory Method: Wetland identification and interpretation was done “heads-up” using ArcMap versions 10.6.1. US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) mapping contractors in Portland, Oregon completed the original aerial photo interpretation and wetland mapping. Primary authors: Nicholas Jones of SWCA Environmental Consulting. 100% Quality Control (QC) during the NWI mapping was provided by Michael Holscher of SWCA Environmental Consulting.
    [Show full text]
  • COMPARATIVE ECOLOGY of the INVASIVE RUBUS PHOENICOLASIUS and the NATIVE RUBUS ARGUTUS. Anne
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: COMPARATIVE ECOLOGY OF THE INVASIVE RUBUS PHOENICOLASIUS AND THE NATIVE RUBUS ARGUTUS. Anne Foss Innis, Doctor of Philosophy, 2005 Dissertation directed by: Associate Professor Irwin N. Forseth Department of Biology Invasive species are one of the most significant factors in human influenced global change. Management actions that prevent the spread and impacts of invasive species require knowledge of their ecological characteristics. The characteristics of the invasive wine raspberry (Rubus phoenicolasius Maxim.) and the native sawtooth blackberry (Rubus argutus Link) were examined in two forest habitats on the Maryland Coastal Plain. The invasive had greater negative effects on a common herbaceous plant (Duchesnea indica Andr. Focke) than the native. The invasive, R. phoenicolasius had higher leaf nitrogen concentrations (Nleaf), greater specific leaf areas (SLA) and higher maximal rates of photosynthesis (Amax) for a given dark respiration rate (Rd) than R. argutus. R. phoenicolasius depended less upon pollinators for fruit development and had higher fruiting rates with more seeds per fruit than the native species. In addition, seeds of R. phoenicolasius had higher germination rates. Survival of invasive seedlings was negatively affected by leaf litter additions, but seedling growth was not negatively influenced by shading. R. phoenicolasius seedlings grown in a greenhouse and inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi produced less biomass than seedlings that were not inoculated. The distribution of R. phoenicolasius may be affected by leaf litter, but presence of AMF is probably not necessary for seedling success. A three year demographic study showed that both species were negatively impacted by drought, but the invasive recovered faster than the native species in the higher light forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Phylogenetic Taxonomy of Dipsacales, with Special Reference to Sinadoxa and Tetradoxa (Adoxaceae)
    PHYLOGENY AND PHYLOGENETIC TAXONOMY OF DIPSACALES, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SINADOXA AND TETRADOXA (ADOXACEAE) MICHAEL J. DONOGHUE,1 TORSTEN ERIKSSON,2 PATRICK A. REEVES,3 AND RICHARD G. OLMSTEAD 3 Abstract. To further clarify phylogenetic relationships within Dipsacales,we analyzed new and previously pub- lished rbcL sequences, alone and in combination with morphological data. We also examined relationships within Adoxaceae using rbcL and nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences. We conclude from these analyses that Dipsacales comprise two major lineages:Adoxaceae and Caprifoliaceae (sensu Judd et al.,1994), which both contain elements of traditional Caprifoliaceae.Within Adoxaceae, the following relation- ships are strongly supported: (Viburnum (Sambucus (Sinadoxa (Tetradoxa, Adoxa)))). Combined analyses of C ap ri foliaceae yield the fo l l ow i n g : ( C ap ri folieae (Diervilleae (Linnaeeae (Morinaceae (Dipsacaceae (Triplostegia,Valerianaceae)))))). On the basis of these results we provide phylogenetic definitions for the names of several major clades. Within Adoxaceae, Adoxina refers to the clade including Sinadoxa, Tetradoxa, and Adoxa.This lineage is marked by herbaceous habit, reduction in the number of perianth parts,nectaries of mul- ticellular hairs on the perianth,and bifid stamens. The clade including Morinaceae,Valerianaceae, Triplostegia, and Dipsacaceae is here named Valerina. Probable synapomorphies include herbaceousness,presence of an epi- calyx (lost or modified in Valerianaceae), reduced endosperm,and distinctive chemistry, including production of monoterpenoids. The clade containing Valerina plus Linnaeeae we name Linnina. This lineage is distinguished by reduction to four (or fewer) stamens, by abortion of two of the three carpels,and possibly by supernumerary inflorescences bracts. Keywords: Adoxaceae, Caprifoliaceae, Dipsacales, ITS, morphological characters, phylogeny, phylogenetic taxonomy, phylogenetic nomenclature, rbcL, Sinadoxa, Tetradoxa.
    [Show full text]
  • Noteworthy Collections
    48 THE MICHIGAN BOTANIST Vol. 52 NOTEWORTHY COLLECTIONS MICHIGAN Viburnum sieboldii Miq. Adoxaceae Siebold’s Arrowwood. Significance of the Report. First known naturalized occurrence in Michigan of a potentially invasive species. Previous Knowledge. Viburnum sieboldii is a large shrub or small tree native to Japan, where it occurs in thickets in lowlands and low mountains (Ohwi 1965). It was introduced to eastern North America in the late nineteenth century as a landscape ornamental, and is known to escape occasionally from cultivation in its introduced range (Kunstler 1993, Gleason and Cronquist 1991). Prior to this collection, naturalized populations of V. sieboldii were known in North America primarily from the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States, from Vir - ginia north to New York and Massachusetts (USDA NRCS 2014), although more recently it has also been reported from eastern and southern Ohio (Vincent et al. 2011). Escaped populations are known to establish in a variety of habitats, in - cluding mesic forests, stream edges, and suburban parks, and have been reported as abundant or invasive in New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania (Kunstler 1993, DeCandido and Lamont 2004, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources 2014, Central New Jersey Invasive Species Strike Team 2014). On the other hand, Widrlechner and Iles (2002) found that V. sieboldii was at relatively low risk of naturalizing in Iowa because of climatic differences between there and the native habitat of V. sieboldii in Japan. However, it is un - known whether or how ornamental cultivars may differ from native genotypes in invasive potential. The genus Viburnum was long included in the Caprifoliaceae, but is now considered to belong to the Adoxaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Mistaken Identity? Invasive Plants and Their Native Look-Alikes: an Identification Guide for the Mid-Atlantic
    Mistaken Identity ? Invasive Plants and their Native Look-alikes an Identification Guide for the Mid-Atlantic Matthew Sarver Amanda Treher Lenny Wilson Robert Naczi Faith B. Kuehn www.nrcs.usda.gov http://dda.delaware.gov www.dsu.edu www.dehort.org www.delawareinvasives.net Published by: Delaware Department Agriculture • November 2008 In collaboration with: Claude E. Phillips Herbarium at Delaware State University • Delaware Center for Horticulture Funded by: U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Cover Photos: Front: Aralia elata leaf (Inset, l-r: Aralia elata habit; Aralia spinosa infloresence, Aralia elata stem) Back: Aralia spinosa habit TABLE OF CONTENTS About this Guide ............................1 Introduction What Exactly is an Invasive Plant? ..................................................................................................................2 What Impacts do Invasives Have? ..................................................................................................................2 The Mid-Atlantic Invasive Flora......................................................................................................................3 Identification of Invasives ..............................................................................................................................4 You Can Make a Difference..............................................................................................................................5 Plant Profiles Trees Norway Maple vs. Sugar
    [Show full text]