DOCSLIB.ORG

Study on Surface Water Quality in Djerdap/Iron Gate Protected Area

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Study on Surface Water Quality in Djerdap/Iron Gate Protected Area STUDY ON SURFACE WATER QUALITY IN DJERDAP/IRON GATE PROTECTED AREA Francisc Popescu, Milan Trumić, Ioan Laza, Bogdana Vujić, Virgil Stoica, Maja Trumić, Nada Štrbać, Ion Dragos Uţu, Milan Antonijević, Dorin Lelea, Carmen Rădescu, Snežana Đoševska The study is a result of “Academic Environmental Protection Studies on surface water quality in significant cross-border nature reservations Djerdap / Iron Gate national park and Carska Bara special nature reserve, with population awareness raising workshops”, financed thru the Interreg – IPA CBC Romania – Serbia Programme 2014 - 2020 Project acronym: AEPS Project eMS code: RORS-462 Project webpage: http://aeps.upt.ro TIMIŞOARA, 2021 ISBN 978-973-0-33702-0 Contents Acknowledgment .................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Danube. National Park Djerdap ....................................................................................................... 3 2. Danube. Iron Gates Natural Park .................................................................................................... 7 3. Danube’s main tributaries in National Park Djerdap – Iron Gate Natural park area .................... 14 3.1. Nera River .............................................................................................................................. 14 3.2. Berzasca River ........................................................................................................................ 18 3.3. Porecka River ......................................................................................................................... 20 3.4. Pek River ................................................................................................................................ 22 3.5. Cerna River ............................................................................................................................ 25 4. Cross-border legal framework in surface water quality ............................................................... 27 5. Study target surface water pollutants fact sheets ........................................................................ 31 5.1. Oxygen regime. Dissolved Oxygen (DO), Biochemical (BOD) and Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) ..................................................................................................................................... 31 + + - - 5.2. Nutrients and general ions. Sodium (Na ), Calcium (Ca2 ), Nitrates (NO3 ), Nitrites (NO2 ), - 3- 2- - Ammonium (NH4 ), Orthophosphate (P-PO4 ), Sulphates (SO4 ), Chloride (Cl ) and Total Nitrogen (TN). ........................................................................................................................ 32 + + 5.3. Heavy metals. Mercury (Hg), Arsenic (As3 ), Lead (Pb), Zinc (Zn2 ), Cadmium (Cd), Manganese (Mn) and Iron (Fe) .............................................................................................. 34 6. Water quality assessment on Danube and its main tributaries in Interreg IPA-CBC Romania- Serbia programme eligible area. ................................................................................................... 37 6.1. Sampling, methods and analytical equipment. ..................................................................... 37 6.2. Water quality on Danube, in Iron Gate / Djerdap cross-border natural parks. .................... 41 6.3. Water quality on Nera River. ................................................................................................. 48 6.4. Water quality on Berzasca River. ........................................................................................... 57 6.5. Water quality on Porecka River. ............................................................................................ 64 6.6. Water quality on Pek River. ................................................................................................... 68 6.7. Water quality on Cerna River. ............................................................................................... 73 7. Conclusion and results analysis ..................................................................................................... 79 References ............................................................................................................................................ 86 1 Cooperation beyond borders. Interreg-IPA Cross-border Cooperation Romania-Serbia Programme is financed by the European Union under the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA II) and co- financed by the partner states in the Programme. Acknowledgment This study was conducted in the frame of research project “Academic Environmental Protection Studies on surface water quality in significant cross-border nature reservations Djerdap / Iron Gate national park and Carska Bara special nature reserve, with population awareness raising workshops.”, acronym AEPS, conducted in partnership of University Politehnica Timisoara (RO), University of Belgrade - Technical Faculty in Bor (SR), Pro Mehedinti Association (RO) and Citizen’s association “Village – Movement for Rural Development Zlot (SR). The project was founded thru Interreg IPA Cross-border Cooperation Romania-Serbia Programme 2014-2020, Programme Priority: PA 2 Environmental protection and risk management / Specific Objective: 2.1 Environmental protection and sustainable use of natural resources. As water is essential to life and is an indispensable resource for ecosystems and their services and for nearly all human activities, our project team experts focused project activities to reach 2 main objectives: Evaluation of environmental current situation in cross border “sister” Danube banks nature reservation Djerdap (Serbia) and national parks Iron Gate (Romania) Raising the awareness of young generations on both sides of the border on the immediate need to protect the region remarkable natural heritage All project activities, outputs, photo gallery and visibility actions can be followed on project webpage: www.aeps.upt.ro 2 Cooperation beyond borders. Interreg-IPA Cross-border Cooperation Romania-Serbia Programme is financed by the European Union under the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA II) and co- financed by the partner states in the Programme. 1. Danube. National Park Djerdap Danube river, one of the longest rivers in Europe, along its flow makes natural border, and one of the remarkable areas, between Republic of Serbia and Romania - „Iron gate“, the pearl of the Danube river. This area is proclaimed as protected areas on both, Serbian and Romanian, sides. Hence, on Romania side, there is National park „Parcul natural Portile de fier" that covers 115655 ha, in Caras-Severin and Mehedinti County, the second largest NP in Romania. National park „Djerdap” is one of the five national parks and the largest one in Serbia. For the first time it is proclaimed as protected area by the Low on NP „Djerdap“ (Official Gazette of RS, No. 39/1993, 44/1993-correction, 53/1993, 67/1993, 48/1994, 101/2005 and 36/2009). The boundaries of NP „Djerdap“ are established by the Law on National Parks (Official Gazette of RS, No. 84/2015 and 95/2018) where it is defined that it covers area of total 63 786,48 ha (45.454,87 hа is state property and 18.331,60 hа is private property). Photo 1. View of the Danube. 3 Cooperation beyond borders. Interreg-IPA Cross-border Cooperation Romania-Serbia Programme is financed by the European Union under the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA II) and co- financed by the partner states in the Programme. The most impressive landmark of this area is certainly gorge “Iron gate” the biggest and one of a kind in Europe, consisting of four smallest gorges and three basins, covering 100km in length and reaching the maximum depth of 170m. It encompasses parts of the massifs of North Kucaj, Miroc and Strbac in the width of 2-10 km, as well as part of the Danube, which belongs to the Republic of Serbia. Photo 2. View of the Danube’s gorges. Additionally, this area is habitat of the over 1100 plant species (e.g.Corylus colurna, Juglans regia, Syringa vulgaris, Taxus baccata, Tilia argentea,Tilia caucasia, Acer intermedium,Quercus pubescens, Ilex aquifolium, etc). Also, this is the only habitat in the world of the Tulipa hungarica, the unique tulip flower. Rich flora and forest ecosystems contributed to the variety of fauna. Hence, the NPs are home of the more than 150 bird’s species. Some of them are exceedingly rare and unique (Aquila chrysaetos, Circaetus gallicus, Haliaeetus albicilla, Ciconia nigra etc). The mammals are also remarkably diverse in this area. For example, this is habitat of otters (Lutra lutra), bears (Ursus arctos) lynx (Lynx lynx), golden jackal (Canis aureus), wild boar (Sus 4 Cooperation beyond borders. Interreg-IPA Cross-border Cooperation Romania-Serbia Programme is financed by the European Union under the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA II) and co- financed by the partner states in the Programme. scrofa), deer (Cervus elaphus), roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra). Also, the uniqueness of national parks is also internationally recognised. Hence, NP “Iron gate” is included on the RAMSAR list of wetlands of international importance and this area is recently designated as UNESCO GLOBAL GEOPARKS, as one of the 15 unique geoparks in the world, as well. The specificity, diversity and the importance of the terrain, flora and fauna
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 18May201600510041
    18MAY201600510041 NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS to be held on June 17, 2016 and MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR with respect to a proposed ARRANGEMENT involving NEVSUN RESOURCES LTD. and RESERVOIR MINERALS INC. May 18, 2016 These materials are important and require your immediate attention. They require shareholders of Nevsun Resources Ltd. to make important decisions. If you are in doubt as to how to make such decisions, please contact your financial, legal, tax or other professional advisors. Merrill: 16-11420-1 - 16ZBI72001 - BA72001A.;11 - Seq 1 - CL 2 18-MAY-2016 12:43:35 Comp: 18-MAY-16 12:09 Checksum: 48189 May 18, 2016 Dear Nevsun shareholder: On April 24, 2016, Nevsun Resources Ltd. (‘‘Nevsun’’) announced that it had entered into an arrangement agreement (the ‘‘Arrangement Agreement’’) with Reservoir Minerals Inc. (‘‘Reservoir’’), pursuant to which, and subject to the terms and conditions of the Arrangement Agreement, Nevsun will acquire all of the issued and outstanding common shares of Reservoir (other than any common shares of Reservoir already owned by Nevsun) pursuant to a plan of arrangement (the ‘‘Arrangement’’) under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia). Assuming the Arrangement is completed, each Reservoir shareholder will receive two (2) Nevsun common shares plus Cdn.$0.001 in cash for each Reservoir common share. Each outstanding option to purchase Reservoir common shares that has not been exercised prior to the Effective Time (as defined in the accompanying Management Information Circular), will be deemed to be assigned and transferred by such holder to Reservoir in exchange for a cash payment from Reservoir equal to the amount by which Cdn.$9.40 exceeds the exercise price of such Reservoir option.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Tourism for Rural Lovren, Vojislavka Šatrić and Jelena Development” (2010 – 2012) Beronja Provided Their Contributions Both in English and Serbian
    Environment and sustainable rural tourism in four regions of Serbia Southern Banat.Central Serbia.Lower Danube.Eastern Serbia - as they are and as they could be - November 2012, Belgrade, Serbia Impressum PUBLISHER: TRANSLATORS: Th e United Nations Environment Marko Stanojević, Jasna Berić and Jelena Programme (UNEP) and Young Pejić; Researchers of Serbia, under the auspices Prof. Branko Karadžić, Prof. Milica of the joint United Nations programme Jovanović Popović, Violeta Orlović “Sustainable Tourism for Rural Lovren, Vojislavka Šatrić and Jelena Development” (2010 – 2012) Beronja provided their contributions both in English and Serbian. EDITORS: Jelena Beronja, David Owen, PROOFREADING: Aleksandar Petrović, Tanja Petrović Charles Robertson, Clare Ann Zubac, Christine Prickett CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS: Prof. Branko Karadžić PhD, GRAPHIC PREPARATION, Prof. Milica Jovanović Popović PhD, LAYOUT and DESIGN: Ass. Prof. Vladimir Stojanović PhD, Olivera Petrović Ass. Prof. Dejan Đorđević PhD, Aleksandar Petrović MSc, COVER ILLUSTRATION: David Owen MSc, Manja Lekić Dušica Trnavac, Ivan Svetozarević MA, PRINTED BY: Jelena Beronja, AVANTGUARDE, Beograd Milka Gvozdenović, Sanja Filipović PhD, Date: November 2012. Tanja Petrović, Mesto: Belgrade, Serbia Violeta Orlović Lovren PhD, Vojislavka Šatrić. Th e designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Moreover, the views expressed do not necessarily represent the decision or the stated policy of the United Nations, nor does citing of trade names or commercial processes constitute endorsement. Acknowledgments Th is publication was developed under the auspices of the United Nations’ joint programme “Sustainable Tourism for Rural Development“, fi nanced by the Kingdom of Spain through the Millennium Development Goals Achievement Fund (MDGF).
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands on Danube Delta Bioisphere Reserve
    Wetland conservation and sustainable use in Romania Dr. Grigore Baboianu, Executive director, Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Romania 11th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands Bucharest, Romania, 6-13 July 2012 “Wetlands: home and destination” Romania Total surface: 238,391 km2 Inhabitants: 19,042,936 (2011) Etnic Groups: Romanian 89%, Hungarian 7.5%, Gipsy 1.9%, German & others 1.6% Position: Central South-Eastern 450 N Latitude 250 E Longitude Climate: Temperate (8 -110 C) Rainfall: 400-600 l/y 11th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands Bucharest, Romania, 6-13 July 2012 Relief: Mountains (35%) - Carpathian, 910 km - Dobrogea Hills (35%) Plains (30%) Black Sea (245 km) Danube Delta (3,510 km2) 11th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands Bucharest, Romania, 6-13 July 2012 Wetlands in Romania In Romania there were inventoried: Lakes: 3,450 (2,650 km2 - 1,1%): mountain (glacial, carst, vulcanoes), floodplain, reservoirs, marine and coastal lagoons and lakes of Danube Delta. Rivers: 120,000 km: (Danube River (1,075 km), 28 rivers >162 km (8,096 km)) Swamps: 215 (52 km2) Map of wetlands distribution in Romania 11TH Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands Bucharest, Romania, 6-13 July 2012 Main use/role of wetlands: Flood Control Groundwater Replenishment Shoreline Stabilisation & Storm Protection Sediment & Nutrient Retention and Export Climate Change Mitigation Water Purification Reservoirs
    [Show full text]
  • Smart, Sustainable, Inclusive
    Continuing previous meetings: Forum Carpaticum 2010 (Krakow, Poland), Forum Carpaticum 2012 (Stará Lesná, Slovakia), Forum Carpaticum 2014 (Lviv, Ukraine), Forum Carpaticum 2016 (Bucharest, Romania) addresses the need to make a bridge of smart sustainable development in the Carpathians with scientists, stakeholders, institutions, NGOs, communities. The Carpathian Region – the Green Backbone of Europe – faces many opportunities as well as challenges to the future development of the area. The stakeholders, decision makers and research communities can use them wisely for the enhanced protection and sustainable development of the Carpathians. These overall goals meet well with the EU 2020 Cohesion Policy, which proposes “Smart”, “Sustainable” and “Inclusive” to be the keywords when addressing the main priorities for the near future. Forum Carpaticum 2016 „Future of the Carpathians: Smart, Sustainable, Inclusive“ proposes to concentrate on these priorities and to debate how they can be implemented in the Carpathian Region, during the following main thematic sessions: Smart Carpathians session aims to present and discuss the leading edge achievements in: recent and future information and communication technologies; emerging paradigms and methodological developments; front-rank research infrastructures, capacities and innovations; open knowledge, information and data systems applications, in particular those of Carpathian interest. Sustainable Carpathians is expected to cover the topics that consider: climate change adaptation, risk prevention
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement History and Sustainability in the Carpathians in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Settlement history and sustainability in the Carpathians in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries Turnock, David Geography Department, The University, Leicester 21 June 2005 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/26955/ MPRA Paper No. 26955, posted 24 Nov 2010 20:24 UTC Review of Historical Geography and Toponomastics, vol. I, no.1, 2006, pp 31-60 SETTLEMENT HISTORY AND SUSTAINABILITY IN THE CARPATHIANS IN THE EIGHTEENTH AND NINETEENTH CENTURIES David TURNOCK* ∗ Geography Department, The University Leicester LE1 7RH, U.K. Abstract: As part of a historical study of the Carpathian ecoregion, to identify salient features of the changing human geography, this paper deals with the 18th and 19th centuries when there was a large measure political unity arising from the expansion of the Habsburg Empire. In addition to a growth of population, economic expansion - particularly in the railway age - greatly increased pressure on resources: evident through peasant colonisation of high mountain surfaces (as in the Apuseni Mountains) as well as industrial growth most evident in a number of metallurgical centres and the logging activity following the railway alignments through spruce-fir forests. Spa tourism is examined and particular reference is made to the pastoral economy of the Sibiu area nourished by long-wave transhumance until more stringent frontier controls gave rise to a measure of diversification and resettlement. It is evident that ecological risk increased, with some awareness of the need for conservation, although substantial innovations did not occur until after the First World War Rezumat: Ca parte componentă a unui studiu asupra ecoregiunii carpatice, pentru a identifica unele caracteristici privitoare la transformările din domeniul geografiei umane, acest articol se referă la secolele XVIII şi XIX când au existat măsuri politice unitare ale unui Imperiu Habsburgic aflat în expansiune.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Report
    TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF THE STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (SEA) PROCEDURE FOR THE ROMANIA – REPUBLIC OF SERBIA INTERREG IPA CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMME FOR THE PROGRAMMING PERIOD 2021-2027 SCOPING REPORT 8th SEPTEMBER 2020 Disclaimer: The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors. Authors: This document has been prepared within SEA procedure for Romania-Serbia IPA CBC Programme 2021- 2027´ implemented by KVB Consulting & Engineering SRL Contact to the consulting service provider: KVB Consulting & Engineering SRL 147 Mitropolit Varlaam Street, District 1, Bucharest 12903, Romania Contact to the lead author: Geographer Roxana OLARU KVB Consultig & Engineering SRL, [email protected], +40 733 107 793 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ___________________________________________________________ 5 1.1 Purpose of the Scoping Report ______________________________________________ 5 2 DETERMINING THE SUBJECT OF THE PROGRAMME TO THE SEA ____________________ 5 2.1 The outline of the programme ______________________________________________ 5 2.2 Objectives and areas of intervention _________________________________________ 5 2.3 Priorities that the programme covers ________________________________________ 6 3 DETERMINING THE LIKELY SIGNIFICANCE OF EFFECTS ____________________________ 8 3.1 Environmental effects at regional and transboundary level _______________________ 8 3.2 Characteristics of the affected territory_______________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Majdanpek AS
    M 522-572 Majdanpek AS - Jasikovo - Žagubica AS Majdanpek AS - Ku čevo AS Majdanpek AS - Negotin AS Majdanpek AS - Rudna Glava Mala Đala - Martonoš - Kanjiža Mala Reka - Zdravinje - Kruševac AS Mala Remeta - Vrdnik - Selo - Irig AS Male Pijace - Ba čki Vinogradi Male Pijace - Kanjiža Maleševo - Dragovo - Kragujevac AS Mali Zvornik AS - Loznica AS Mali Zvornik AS - Ljubovija AS Manastirica - Boževac - Požarevac AS Medve đa - Bogava - Jagodina AS Medve đa - dom - Stragari - Beograd AS Medve đa - Dražmirovac - Jagodina AS Medve đa - Svilajnac AS Medve đa AS - Lebane AS Medve đa AS - Sijarinska Banja Me đa - Žitište Melenci - Melenci-Banja - Melenci Merošina - Azbresnica - Dudulajce Merošina - Čubura Merošina - Krajkovac - Padina Merošina - Mramor - Niš AS Merošina - Prokuplje AS Milatovi ći - Vi ča - Gu ča AS Mionica AS - Banja Vrujci Mionica AS - Beograd AS Mionica AS - Divci - Valjevo AS Mionica AS - Ljig AS Mladenovac AS - Belosavci - Topola AS Mladenovac AS - Beograd AS (autoput) Mladenovac AS - Beograd Lasta (autoput) Mladenovac AS - Jagnjilo - Jelenac Mladenovac AS - Kr ćevac - Aran đelovac AS Mladenovac AS - Kusadak - Smederevska Palanka AS Mladenovac AS - Markovac - Stojnik Mladenovac AS - Orašac - Aran đelovac AS Mladenovac AS - Velika Krsna - Selevac AS Mladenovo - Centar - Ba čka Palanka AS Mošorin - Centar - Šajkaš - Bazar Mozgovo - Okretnica - Aleksinac AS Mramorak - Dolovo - Pan čevo AS Mr čajevci AS - Gornji Milanovac AS Mr čajevci AS - Kni ć - Kragujevac AS Mr čajevci AS - Kraljevo AS Mr čajevci AS - Preljina - Čačak AS Daljinar Relacija: Majdanpek AS - Jasikovo - Žagubica AS Stanica Me đustani čno rastojanje Dužina relacije Vreme vožnje izme đu Vreme vožnje po relaciji stanica (km) (km) (min) (min) Majdanpek AS 0,0 0,0 0 0 Erozija 3,2 3,2 10 10 Debeli Lug R - FBC 3,2 6,4 3 13 Debeli Lug S 1,7 8,1 2 15 Felješara 3,5 11,6 4 19 Crna reka 2,2 13,8 3 22 Brdo 2,7 16,5 4 26 Stojan.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Public Perception on Protected Areas in Iron Gates Natural Park
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Environmental Sciences 32 ( 2016 ) 70 – 79 International Conference – Environment at a Crossroads: SMART approaches for a sustainable future Assessing public perception on protected areas in Iron Gates Natural Park Cristiana Maria Ciocăneaa*, Carmen Sorescub, Mirela Ianoșib, Vasile Bagrinovschia aUniversity of Bucharest, Centre for Environmental Research and Impact Studies, N. Bălcescu, no.1, Sector 1, Bucharest, 010041, Romania b Environmental Protection Agency Caras-Severin, Petru Maior, no.73, Resita, 320111, Romania Abstract Iron Gates Natural Park, situated in the south-western part of Romania is protected for its remarkable landscape, high biological diversity and unique habitats. The paper assesse the public perception on protected areas in Iron Gates Natural Park and explore perceptions of local residents and local authorities’ attitudes towards protected areas and conservation activities. Most respondents held a positive attitude towards protected areas and the analysis of their attitudes and perceptions revealed potential conflicts that might affect biodiversity conservation and protected area management. The main problems are the limited knowledge and a poor communication with authorities which implies a lack of local participation in conservation activities. Based on our studies, some recommendations are given for improvement of Iron Gates Natural Park management due to the importance of the local community involvement in conservation activities. ©© 2016 2016 The The Authors. Authors. Published Published by Elsevierby Elsevier B.V ThisB.V. is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (Peerhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-review under responsibility of the organizing). committee of ECOSMART 2015. Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of ECOSMART 2015 Keywords: protected area; protected area management; public perception; 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan Donje Podunavlje
    SADRŽAJ I ZADACI .............................................................................................................................................. 1 II PROCEDURE ..................................................................................................................................... 2 III SITUACIONA ANALIZA ..................................................................................................................... 5 1. Analiza prostornih karakteristika područja i društveno-ekonomskog okruženja ........................ 5 1.1. Republika Srbija............................................................................................................... 5 1.1.1. Geografske karakteristike Republike Srbije ........................................................... 5 1.1.2. Ekonomski razvoj Republike Srbije ........................................................................ 6 1.1.2.1. Osnovni strateški pravci i prioriteti privrednog razvoja Srbije ............................ 6 1.1.2.2. Makroekonomske projekcije razvoja Srbije do 2012. godine............................. 8 1.1.2.3. Mehanizmi i politike za ostvarivanje ciljeva nacionalne strategije ..................... 9 1.2. Turističko područje „Donje Podunavlje“ ......................................................................... 12 1.2.1. Geografske karakteristike .................................................................................... 12 1.2.2. Lokacija i društveno-ekonomski razvoj................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Uredba O Kategorizaciji Državnih Puteva
    UREDBA O KATEGORIZACIJI DRŽAVNIH PUTEVA ("Sl. glasnik RS", br. 105/2013 i 119/2013) Predmet Član 1 Ovom uredbom kategorizuju se državni putevi I reda i državni putevi II reda na teritoriji Republike Srbije. Kategorizacija državnih puteva I reda Član 2 Državni putevi I reda kategorizuju se kao državni putevi IA reda i državni putevi IB reda. Državni putevi IA reda Član 3 Državni putevi IA reda su: Redni broj Oznaka puta OPIS 1. A1 državna granica sa Mađarskom (granični prelaz Horgoš) - Novi Sad - Beograd - Niš - Vranje - državna granica sa Makedonijom (granični prelaz Preševo) 2. A2 Beograd - Obrenovac - Lajkovac - Ljig - Gornji Milanovac - Preljina - Čačak - Požega 3. A3 državna granica sa Hrvatskom (granični prelaz Batrovci) - Beograd 4. A4 Niš - Pirot - Dimitrovgrad - državna granica sa Bugarskom (granični prelaz Gradina) 5. A5 Pojate - Kruševac - Kraljevo - Preljina Državni putevi IB reda Član 4 Državni putevi IB reda su: Redni Oznaka OPIS broj puta 1. 10 Beograd-Pančevo-Vršac - državna granica sa Rumunijom (granični prelaz Vatin) 2. 11 državna granica sa Mađarskom (granični prelaz Kelebija)-Subotica - veza sa državnim putem A1 3. 12 Subotica-Sombor-Odžaci-Bačka Palanka-Novi Sad-Zrenjanin-Žitište-Nova Crnja - državna granica sa Rumunijom (granični prelaz Srpska Crnja) 4. 13 Horgoš-Kanjiža-Novi Kneževac-Čoka-Kikinda-Zrenjanin-Čenta-Beograd 5. 14 Pančevo-Kovin-Ralja - veza sa državnim putem 33 6. 15 državna granica sa Mađarskom (granični prelaz Bački Breg)-Bezdan-Sombor- Kula-Vrbas-Srbobran-Bečej-Novi Bečej-Kikinda - državna granica sa Rumunijom (granični prelaz Nakovo) 7. 16 državna granica sa Hrvatskom (granični prelaz Bezdan)-Bezdan 8. 17 državna granica sa Hrvatskom (granični prelaz Bogojevo)-Srpski Miletić 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Background of the Trust
    Transylv. Rev. Syst. Ecol. Res. 16 ‒ special issue (2014), The “Iron Gates” Natural Park 211 SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DYNAMIC OF RURAL AND URBAN LANDSCAPES IDENTIFIED IN THE “IRON GATES” NATURAL PARK Mihăiţă-Iulian NICULAE *, Mihai Răzvan NIŢĂ *, Gabriel VANĂU *, Cristiana CIOCANEA * and Athanasios GAVRILIDIS * * University of Bucharest, Centre for Environmental Research and Impact Studies, Nicolae Bălcescu Boulevard 1, Sector 1, CP 010041, Bucharest, Romania, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] DOI: 10.1515/trser-2015-0043 KEYWORDS: Rural and urban landscape, land use, land cover, landscape change, “Iron Gates” Natural Park, Romania. ABSTRACT In the present paper, we identified landscape typologies in the “Iron Gates” Natural Park from Romania and assessed their dynamic starting with 1990 to 2006. We evaluated the dynamic of landscapes based on land use and land covers changes as extracted from the Corine Land Cover databases. We found no major modifications in the distribution of landscapes, only 4.4% of the study area recording changes. Forestry landscapes have the highest ratio of change (on 1.5% from the total surface of the park), with significant decreases also recorded in landscapes of shrub and rare vegetation, as well as mixed agricultural landscapes. Among the active transformation processes, forestation (on 45% of the modified surface) and agricultural activities (20%) recorded the highest distribution. RÉSUMÉ: La dynamique spatiale et temporelle des paysages ruraux et urbains dans le Parc Naturel des “Portes de Fer”. L’article fait un inventaire des catégories de paysages qui se trouvent dans le Parc Naturel des “Portes de Fer” des Roumanie et analyse la dynamique de ces paysages de 1990 à 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Background and Introduction
    Chapter One: Background and Introduction Chapter One Background and Introduction title chapter page 17 © Libor Vojtíšek, Ján Lacika, Jan W. Jongepier, Florentina Pop CHAPTER?INDD Chapter One: Background and Introduction he Carpathian Mountains encompass Their total length of 1,500 km is greater than that many unique landscapes, and natural and of the Alps at 1,000 km, the Dinaric Alps at 800 Tcultural sites, in an expression of both km and the Pyrenees at 500 km (Dragomirescu geographical diversity and a distinctive regional 1987). The Carpathians’ average altitude, how- evolution of human-environment relations over ever, of approximately 850 m. is lower compared time. In this KEO Report, the “Carpathian to 1,350 m. in the Alps. The northwestern and Region” is defined as the Carpathian Mountains southern parts, with heights over 2,000 m., are and their surrounding areas. The box below the highest and most massive, reaching their offers a full explanation of the different delimi- greatest elevation at Slovakia’s Gerlachovsky tations or boundaries of the Carpathian Mountain Peak (2,655 m.). region and how the chain itself and surrounding areas relate to each other. Stretching like an arc across Central Europe, they span seven countries starting from the The Carpathian Mountains are the largest, Czech Republic in the northwest, then running longest and most twisted and fragmented moun- east and southwards through Slovakia, Poland, tain chain in Europe. Their total surface area is Hungary, Ukraine and Romania, and finally 161,805 sq km1, far greater than that of the Alps Serbia in the Carpathians’ extreme southern at 140,000 sq km.
    [Show full text]