Background and Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Background and Introduction Chapter One: Background and Introduction Chapter One Background and Introduction title chapter page 17 © Libor Vojtíšek, Ján Lacika, Jan W. Jongepier, Florentina Pop CHAPTER?INDD Chapter One: Background and Introduction he Carpathian Mountains encompass Their total length of 1,500 km is greater than that many unique landscapes, and natural and of the Alps at 1,000 km, the Dinaric Alps at 800 Tcultural sites, in an expression of both km and the Pyrenees at 500 km (Dragomirescu geographical diversity and a distinctive regional 1987). The Carpathians’ average altitude, how- evolution of human-environment relations over ever, of approximately 850 m. is lower compared time. In this KEO Report, the “Carpathian to 1,350 m. in the Alps. The northwestern and Region” is defined as the Carpathian Mountains southern parts, with heights over 2,000 m., are and their surrounding areas. The box below the highest and most massive, reaching their offers a full explanation of the different delimi- greatest elevation at Slovakia’s Gerlachovsky tations or boundaries of the Carpathian Mountain Peak (2,655 m.). region and how the chain itself and surrounding areas relate to each other. Stretching like an arc across Central Europe, they span seven countries starting from the The Carpathian Mountains are the largest, Czech Republic in the northwest, then running longest and most twisted and fragmented moun- east and southwards through Slovakia, Poland, tain chain in Europe. Their total surface area is Hungary, Ukraine and Romania, and finally 161,805 sq km1, far greater than that of the Alps Serbia in the Carpathians’ extreme southern at 140,000 sq km. Stretching between 49047’14’’ reach (see Map 1.1, and Table 1.1 for country and 43028’25’’ latitude North and 16058’37’’ and areas and populations in Carpathians). By some 26038’46’’ longitude East, their extension over definitions, the westernmost tip of the Carpa­ 6o of latitude and 10o longitude has led to their thians occurs in eastern Austria (“Hainburger exhibiting a great diversity of natural conditions. Berge” Hill near Vienna; 480 m). Table 1.1 Area and Population of the Carpathians by Country (EURAC 2006) National Proposals to the CFC Country Area (sq. km.) in the Percentage of total Inhabitants Percentage of Carpathians’ Carpathians Carpathians’ area in millions total population CZ 7,124 4.4 1.46 8.4 HU 9,626 6.0 1.77 10.2 PL 17,263 10.7 3.47 19.9 RO 69,872 43.11 4.87 27.9 SK 35,050 21.66 3.80 21.8 Serbia 761 0.47 0.06 0.4 UA 22,109 13.66 1.98 11.4 Total 161,805 100 17.41 100 1 The surface corresponds to the Carpathian countries’ National Proposals to the CFC (EURAC 2006). 18 Chapter One: Background and Introduction Map 1.1 The Carpathian Mountains and their sub-units The Carpathians represent the prolongation of North of Vienna on Czech territory, the limit be- the Alps to the east and northeast, from which tween the Carpathians and the Bohemian Plateau they are separated by the Vienna Basin (see Map and Sudeten Mountains is represented by the 1.2). Most of the Carpathians are located in the Outer Carpathian Depressions (Dyjsko-svratecký middle and the lower parts of the Danube River úval, Moravian Gate Hornomoravský úval, Vyš- Basin, with the remainder in the Dniester, Vistula kovská brana), which are drained by the upper and Oder basins. courses of the Morava and Odra rivers. To the south, the Carpathians extend into Serbian territo- 19 Chapter One: Background and Introduction Map 1.2 The Carpathians in Europe ry up to the Timok Valley, which separates them Piedmont to the south. On the “inner” mountain from the Stara Planina Mountains (> 2,000 m.). side, the large Pannonian Depression separates the Carpathians from the Alps and the Dinaric The Carpathians’ “outer” mountain side domi- Mountains. nates to the east and south the East-European and Moesian platforms, which extend onto The Inner and Outer Carpathians are geological Ukrainian and Romanian territories, and which units which differ from the point of view of their have shaped the arc-like pattern of the Car- geological evolution. The Inner Carpathians pathian Mountain chain. The Eastern and South- comprise crystalline, calcareous and conglomer- ern Carpathians are bordered by the hilly region ate rocks, and include the Tatra Mountains, of the sub-Carpathians and by the large Getic Eastern Carpathians and Southern Carpathians. 20 Chapter One: Background and Introduction The Outer Carpathians (also called the Flysch In Romania, the Transylvanian Depression, Carpathians) are composed of sedimentary rocks although a mountain form (orogen) by geolo- (turbidite) and are located in the “external” part gical structure, is considered to be a plateau (northern and eastern) of the Northwestern, surrounded by various Carpathian ranges with Northeastern and Eastern Carpathians. respect to altitude, make-up, landscape and density of settlement. Different Delimitations of the Carpathian Mountains Region For the purposes of this KEO Report and analyses con- graphic knots with peaks of over 2,500 m. and differenti- tained herein, the “Carpathian Region” is defined as the ated three orographic “ensembles”: the Tatra, the Mara- Carpathian Mountain Chain and its surrounding areas. mures and the Transylvanian Alps (George and Tricart The territory surrounding the Carpathians consists main- 1954a,b). ly of sediments of Carpathian origin whose formation is connected with the evolution of the Carpathian Chain it- In one of his works published in Romanian, V. Mihailescu self. Sediments are eroded from the Carpathian area (1963), basing his considerations on geographical crite- and transported by rivers to the lower, surrounding terri- ria, geomorphological and population aspects, distin- tories. The area includes folded hilly regions, piedmonts guished the following Carpathian groups: 1. North-West- and depressions, among them the Transylvanian De- ern Carpathians; 2. Median Carpathians; and 3. South- pression. These environs are affected by the mountain- Eastern Carpathians (3a-Eastern Carpathians, 3b- ous region, and natural and anthropogenic phenomena Southern Carpathians and 3c-Western Carpathians). occurring therein, and in turn exert influences on the mountain zone itself. For example, the Carpathian Moun- One of the classifications most frequently used and tains are a significant orographic barrier influencing the based on geomorphological and geological criteria is climate and precipitation of the larger region, and river that of the Polish geographer Kondracki (1978), who dis- outflows have a major influence on the surrounding hilly tinguishes the following main groups: the Western Car- regions and plains. One counter-example of influences pathians (Outer and Inner); the Eastern Carpathians on the Mountains is emissions from industrial sources, (Outer and Inner); the Southern Carpathians and the transport and urbanization in commercial and population Western Romanian Carpathians. The Carpathian area is centres located in close proximity, which have impacts shown to also include the surrounding hilly regions and on the flora and fauna of the Carpathian Mountains. depressions, among them the Transylvanian Depres- Economic activities practiced in the mountain region are sion. complemented by those of the lowland and urbanized population, who exploit the Carpathians’ natural resourc- In a synthesis on European mountainous space, the es. Thus the mountains themselves and surrounding Hungarian geographer Székely (1968), integrating the areas must be viewed as a complex, holistic, unique Carpathian Chain into the Alpine-Himalayan mountain environmental system. system, distinguished the following sub-divisions: the North-Western Carpathians, the North-Eastern Carpathi- The different delimitations of the Carpathian Mountain ans, the Eastern Carpathians and the Southern Car- chain found in the specialist literature depend on the pathians. A similar delimitation is made also in this KEO criteria used and the purpose of research. Most authors Report (see Map 1.1), although in this case the Southern focus essentially on geomorphological criteria along with Carpathians are sub-divided into two units. altitude. In some delimitations, complex environmental criteria and human activities are included. In the World Wide Fund for Nature’s (WWF’s) Carpathi- ans Ecoregion Initiative (CERI), the delimitation of the In one of the first delimitations of the Carpathian Moun- Carpathians is based on complex criteria, mainly geo- tains found in a French Atlas, the following sub-units are morphological (elevation, slope, exposition, geology) depicted: Karpates Occidentales, Karpates Orientales and ecological. The Ecoregion stretches along 210,000 and Alpes de Transylvanie (Levasseur 1886). In a syn- sq. km. between Vienna and the Danube Gorges (i.e. the thesis of the physical and human geography of Central Iron Gate Dam between Romania and Serbia), including Europe, Jean Tricart, the well-known French geogra- the Transylvanian Depression and much of the outer hilly pher, highlighted the discontinuous character of oro- regions (see Chapter 3, section 3.2, Map 3.4). 21 Chapter One: Background and Introduction © Pavel Meisl 1.1 Main Geographical Features Altitudinal Zones he very existence of the Carpathian Arc The alpine belt was molded by Pleistocene in Central Europe induces significant re- glaciation (cirques, troughs) with sharp crests Tgional differentiations and a wide diver- and steep slopes affected by weathering, rockfall sity of geographical conditions, due to the and snow avalanches. It is well-developed in the impacts of varying influences: oceanic in the Tatra Mountains and the Southern Carpathians. west, Baltic in the north, continental in the east The alpine belt itself is traditionally further and Mediterranean in the south. divided into three altitudinal levels: sub-nival, with local perennial snow patches; alpine There are three major Carpathian altitudinal meadow; and dwarf pine. The Southern Car- zones: the High Mountains (>1500 m.), Middle pathians in particular include old denuded sur- Mountains (600-1450 m.), and the Lower Moun- faces with moderate slopes.
Recommended publications
  • Activity 2.7: Forestry and Timber Industry
    INTERREG III B CADSES Programme Carpathian Project Activity 2.7: Forestry and timber industry Report on Current State of Forest Resources in the Carpathians ( Working Group: Tommaso Anfodillo Marco Carrer Elena Dalla Valle Elisa Giacoma Silvia Lamedica Davide Pettenella Legnaro, 20 January 2008 UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI PADOVA DIPARTIMENTO TERRITORIO E SISTEMI AGRO-FORESTALI AGRIPOLIS – Viale dell’Università, 16 – 35020 LEGNARO (Padova) Tel. +390498272728-+390498272730 – Fax +3904982722750 – P.IVA 00742430283 Disclaimer: This publication has been produced by the Carpathian Project under the INTERREG III B CADSES Neighbourhood Programme and co-financed by the European Union. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union, of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), of the Carpathian Convention or of the partner institutions. Activity 2.7 Carpathian Project – University of Padova, Dept. TeSAF INDEX INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................5 The Carpathian Convention - SARD-F..............................................................................................................5 Objectives.........................................................................................................................................................5 Methods............................................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions to the Knowledge of the Bats' Fauna in the Rodna Mountains National Park Iuşan Claudiu
    Contributions to the knowledge of the bats' fauna in the Rodna Mountains National Park Iuşan Claudiu Abstract During the period 2004-2017, 20 species of bats were identified in the Rodna Mountains National Park through direct observations from the cave visits and the use of monitoring using mixed bat detectors (heterodines with frequency division and expansion time) and chicropterological nets placed in forest and aquatic habitats. Of the 20 species of bats in the Rodna Mountains, one is included in the category of vulnerable species (VU), 3 species in the moderate threat category (NT). The inventory of bats species bas increased from 14 to 20 species through research carried out with the support of the Rodna Mountains National Park Administration, but the number of species in the Rodna massif may increase in future studies. Keywords: lilieci, peşteri, protejat, inventar lntroduction The bats study was carried out during the period 2004-2017 in Rodna Mountains National Park, the second national park in the country, with an area of 47.202 ha. The importance of this protected area is due both to the geology and geomorphology of the mountains and to the presence of many species of fauna and flora, endemites and glacial relics. The Rodna Mountains, which show the highest altitudes in the Eastem Carpathians (Pietrosu Peak - 2.303 m, Inău Peak 2.279 m, Inăuţ Peak 2.222 m), are located in the northem part of Romania. Being included in the Nordic group, also known as the Carpathians of Maramureş and Bucovina, these mountains dominate the landscape, with the highest levei differences in the Maramureş Depression, located to the north.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Structure and Land Use Change in the Bieszczady Mountains
    Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Geographisches Institut Studienprojekt und Geländepraktikum Karpaten 2014 Veranstaltungsnummer 34042 Seminarleitung Tobias Kümmerle, Jan Knorn, Patrick Culbert Sommersemester 2014 Forest Structure and Land Use Change in the Bieszczady Mountains Projektarbeit als Modulabschlussprüfung (MAP) Abgabe 14. November 2014 Monobachelor Geographie, 6. Fachsemester Beifach Regionalstudien Asien/Afrika Studienprojekt und Geländepraktikum Karpaten 2014 – MAP Table of contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 4 2. Materials and Methods .............................................................................................................................. 5 2.1. Study area ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2. Forest classification ............................................................................................................................ 6 2.3. Sampling Design ................................................................................................................................. 6 2.4. Field Methods ..................................................................................................................................... 7 2.5. Data Analysis .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Population in the Slovak Carpathian Mountains
    Monitoring protocol for the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) population in the Slovak Carpathian Mountains A1. Assessment and selection of sites and lynx for live-capture from the Carpathian source population in Slovakia D1. Monitoring the effects of lynx removal for translocations on the source populations Authors: Kubala J. Smolko P. Klinga P. Tám B. & Kropil R. September 2018 Report for the implementation of action A1 and D1 Realized in the frame of action A1: Assessment and selection of sites and lynx for live-capture from the Carpathian source population in Slovakia Authors: Kubala J. Smolko P. Klinga P. Tám B. & Kropil R. Content 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………….5 2. Objectives and attributes……………………………………………………………….7 3. Survey areas…………………………………………………………………………....7 4. Aims and principles of monitoring……………………………………………………11 5. What will be monitored?................................................................................................11 6. Monitoring network…………………………………………………………………...14 7. Passive monitoring: Collecting a chance (opportunistic information)………………..14 8. Active monitoring: Systematic surveys and monitoring system………………………15 8.1. Snow tracking………………………………………………………………………...15 8.2. Opportunistic and standardized collection of samples for genetic analysis…………..16 8.3. Camera trapping………………………………………………………………….......16 8.3.1. Opportunistic camera trapping……………………………………………………17 8.3.2. Deterministic camera trapping………………………………………………….....18 8.4. Captures and GPS/GSM telemetry…………………………………………………...20 9. Survey, monitoring and capture time-frame…………………………………………..22 References…………………………………………………………………………………….23 Foreword The purpose of this protocol is to provide detailed information about the objectives, attributes, sampling design and data management necessary for the implementation of the actions A1 and D1 within the LIFE LYNX - LIFE16 NAT/SI/000634 Together with the protocol on the A2 action in the Romanian Carpathians - Gazzola et al. (2018) it is required by the need to ensure a technical framework for the LIFE Lynx project team.
    [Show full text]
  • Climatic Implications of Cirque Distribution in the Romanian Carpathians: Palaeowind Directions During Glacial Periods
    JOURNAL OF QUATERNARY SCIENCE (2010) Copyright ß 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/jqs.1363 Climatic implications of cirque distribution in the Romanian Carpathians: palaeowind directions during glacial periods MARCEL MIˆNDRESCU,1 IAN S. EVANS2* and NICHOLAS J. COX2 1 Department of Geography, University of Suceava, Suceava, Romania 2 Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham, UK Mıˆndrescu, M., Evans, I. S. and Cox, N. J. Climatic implications of cirque distribution in the Romanian Carpathians: palaeowind directions during glacial periods. J. Quaternary Sci., (2010). ISSN 0267-8179. Received 10 May 2009; Revised 23 October 2009; Accepted 2 November 2009 ABSTRACT: The many glacial cirques in the mountains of Romania indicate the distribution of former glacier sources, related to former climates as well as to topography. In the Transylvanian Alps (Southern Carpathians) cirque floors rise eastward at 0.714 m kmÀ1, and cirque aspects tend ENE, confirming the importance of winds from some westerly direction. There is a contrast between two neighbouring ranges: the Fa˘ga˘ras¸, where the favoured aspect of cirques is ENE, and the Iezer, where the tendency is stronger and to NNE. This can be explained by the Iezer Mountains being sheltered by the Fa˘ga˘ras¸, which implies precipitation-bearing winds from north of west at times of mountain glaciation. Palaeoglaciation levels also suggest winds from north of west, which is consistent with aeolian evidence from Pleistocene dunes, yardangs and loess features in the plains of Hungary and south- western Romania. In northern Romania (including Ukrainian Maramures¸) the influence of west winds was important, but sufficient only to give a northeastward tendency in cirque aspects.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transformation of the Natural Environment of The
    / !"# 27 THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT OF THE POLISH AND UKRAINIAN BIESZCZADY MOUNTAINS DUE TO TOURISM AND OTHER FORMS OF HUMAN PRESSURE Agnieszka Œwigost Institute of Urban Development, Krakow, Poland Abstract The area of Bieszczady Mountains is the cross-border zone characterized by a great diversity in both policies and a level of economic development between the Polish and Ukrainian part of the region. Therefore, it exhibits a significant variation in the degree, form and character of anthropopres- sure. The main aim of the study is to compare the intensity of transformation of Polish and Ukrainian parts of Bieszczady Mountains and indicate the anthropogenic conditions existing in both countries. Four villages of Bieszczady were analysed – Solina and Wetlina in Poland and Sianki and Volosjanka in Ukraine. The study, conducted using the point scoring evaluation method, showed large variations in the degree of anthropopressure in different localities. The area that has the lowest level of human impact is Po³onina Wetliñska while the largest one occurs in Solina. Wetlina, Sianki and Volosjanka have a similar level of transformation. Research areas located in the Polish part of Bieszczady are exposed to environmental changes primarily related to the development of tourism. In Ukraine, the pressure is observable due to unregulated water and sewage systems, a large accumulation of possessions with a traditional heating and highly developed railway network. Keywords: anthropopressure; tourism; Polish Bieszczady Mountains; Ukrainian Bieszczady Mountains Introduction rently, research in the field of anthropopressure includes also Contemporary transformations of the natural environment the less visible transformation of the environment caused for are the consequences of not only natural alterations but also instance by tourism development.
    [Show full text]
  • Pădurea Craiului Mountains, Romania)
    Carnets Geol. 21 (11) E-ISSN 1634-0744 DOI 10.2110/carnets.2021.2111 New insights into the depositional environment and stratigraphic position of the Gugu Breccia (Pădurea Craiului Mountains, Romania) Traian SUCIU 1, 2 George PLEŞ 1, 3 Tudor TĂMAŞ 1, 4 Ioan I. BUCUR 1, 5 Emanoil SĂSĂRAN 1, 6 Ioan COCIUBA 7 Abstract: The study of the carbonate clasts and matrix of a problematic sedimentary formation (the Gugu Breccia) from the Pădurea Craiului Mountains reveals new information concerning its depositional environment and stratigraphic position. The identified microfacies and micropaleontological assem- blages demonstrate that all the sampled limestone clasts from the Gugu Breccia represent remnants of a fragmented Urgonian-type carbonate platform. The Barremian age of the clasts suggests that the stratigraphic position of the Gugu Breccia at its type locality could be uppermost Barremian-lowermost Aptian, a fact demonstrated also by the absence of elements from Lower Cretaceous carbonate plat- forms higher in the stratigraphic column (e.g., Aptian or Albian) of the Bihor Unit. The sedimentological observations together with the matrix mineralogy bring new arguments for the recognition of terrige- nous input during the formation of the Gugu Breccia. Key-words: • breccia; • microfacies; • carbonate platforms; • matrix mineralogy; • benthic foraminifera; • calcareous algae; • Lower Cretaceous; • Romania Citation: SUCIU T., PLEŞ G., TĂMAŞ T., BUCUR I.I., SĂSĂRAN E. & COCIUBA I. (2021). - New insights into the depositional environment and stratigraphic position of the Gugu Breccia (Pădurea Craiului Moun- tains, Romania).- Carnets Geol., Madrid, vol. 21, no. 11, p. 215-233. 1 Department of Geology and Center for Integrated Geological Studies, Babeş-Bolyai University, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement History and Sustainability in the Carpathians in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Settlement history and sustainability in the Carpathians in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries Turnock, David Geography Department, The University, Leicester 21 June 2005 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/26955/ MPRA Paper No. 26955, posted 24 Nov 2010 20:24 UTC Review of Historical Geography and Toponomastics, vol. I, no.1, 2006, pp 31-60 SETTLEMENT HISTORY AND SUSTAINABILITY IN THE CARPATHIANS IN THE EIGHTEENTH AND NINETEENTH CENTURIES David TURNOCK* ∗ Geography Department, The University Leicester LE1 7RH, U.K. Abstract: As part of a historical study of the Carpathian ecoregion, to identify salient features of the changing human geography, this paper deals with the 18th and 19th centuries when there was a large measure political unity arising from the expansion of the Habsburg Empire. In addition to a growth of population, economic expansion - particularly in the railway age - greatly increased pressure on resources: evident through peasant colonisation of high mountain surfaces (as in the Apuseni Mountains) as well as industrial growth most evident in a number of metallurgical centres and the logging activity following the railway alignments through spruce-fir forests. Spa tourism is examined and particular reference is made to the pastoral economy of the Sibiu area nourished by long-wave transhumance until more stringent frontier controls gave rise to a measure of diversification and resettlement. It is evident that ecological risk increased, with some awareness of the need for conservation, although substantial innovations did not occur until after the First World War Rezumat: Ca parte componentă a unui studiu asupra ecoregiunii carpatice, pentru a identifica unele caracteristici privitoare la transformările din domeniul geografiei umane, acest articol se referă la secolele XVIII şi XIX când au existat măsuri politice unitare ale unui Imperiu Habsburgic aflat în expansiune.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Wetlands and Floodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin Final Report May 1999
    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN FINAL REPORT MAY 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by WWF Danube-Carpathian-Programme and WWF-Auen-Institut (Germany) DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN FINAL REPORT MAY 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by WWF Danube-Carpathian-Programme and WWF-Auen-Institut (Germany) Preface The "Evaluation of Wetlands and Flkoodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin" study was prepared in the frame of the Danube Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP). The Study has been undertaken to define priority wetland and floodplain rehabilitation sites as a component of the Pollution reduction Programme. The present report addresses the identification of former floodplains and wetlands in the Danube River Basin, as well as the description of the current status and evaluation of the ecological importance of the potential for rehabilitation. Based on this evaluation, 17 wetland/floodplain sites have been identified for rehabilitation considering their ecological importance, their nutrient removal capacity and their role in flood protection. Most of the identified wetlands will require transboundary cooperation and represent an important first step in retoring the ecological balance in the Danube River Basin. The results are presented in the form of thematic maps that can be found in Annex I of the study. The study was prepared by the WWF-Danube-Carpathian-Programme and the WWF-Auen-Institut (Institute for Floodplains Ecology, WWF-Germany), under the guidance of the UNDP/GEF team of experts of the Danube Programme Coordination Unit (DPCU) in Vienna, Austria.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Wildlife and Traffic in the Carpathians
    Wildlife and Traffic in the Carpathians Guidelines how to minimize the impact of transport infrastructure development on nature in the Carpathian countries Wildlife and Traffic in the Carpathians Guidelines how to minimize the impact of transport infrastructure development on nature in the Carpathian countries Part of Output 3.2 Planning Toolkit TRANSGREEN Project “Integrated Transport and Green Infrastructure Planning in the Danube-Carpathian Region for the Benefit of People and Nature” Danube Transnational Programme, DTP1-187-3.1 April 2019 Project co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) www.interreg-danube.eu/transgreen Authors Václav Hlaváč (Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic, Member of the Carpathian Convention Work- ing Group for Sustainable Transport, co-author of “COST 341 Habitat Fragmentation due to Trans- portation Infrastructure, Wildlife and Traffic, A European Handbook for Identifying Conflicts and Designing Solutions” and “On the permeability of roads for wildlife: a handbook, 2002”) Petr Anděl (Consultant, EVERNIA s.r.o. Liberec, Czech Republic, co-author of “On the permeability of roads for wildlife: a handbook, 2002”) Jitka Matoušová (Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic) Ivo Dostál (Transport Research Centre, Czech Republic) Martin Strnad (Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic, specialist in ecological connectivity) Contributors Andriy-Taras Bashta (Biologist, Institute of Ecology of the Carpathians, National Academy of Science in Ukraine) Katarína Gáliková (National
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Report
    TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF THE STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (SEA) PROCEDURE FOR THE ROMANIA – REPUBLIC OF SERBIA INTERREG IPA CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMME FOR THE PROGRAMMING PERIOD 2021-2027 SCOPING REPORT 8th SEPTEMBER 2020 Disclaimer: The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors. Authors: This document has been prepared within SEA procedure for Romania-Serbia IPA CBC Programme 2021- 2027´ implemented by KVB Consulting & Engineering SRL Contact to the consulting service provider: KVB Consulting & Engineering SRL 147 Mitropolit Varlaam Street, District 1, Bucharest 12903, Romania Contact to the lead author: Geographer Roxana OLARU KVB Consultig & Engineering SRL, [email protected], +40 733 107 793 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ___________________________________________________________ 5 1.1 Purpose of the Scoping Report ______________________________________________ 5 2 DETERMINING THE SUBJECT OF THE PROGRAMME TO THE SEA ____________________ 5 2.1 The outline of the programme ______________________________________________ 5 2.2 Objectives and areas of intervention _________________________________________ 5 2.3 Priorities that the programme covers ________________________________________ 6 3 DETERMINING THE LIKELY SIGNIFICANCE OF EFFECTS ____________________________ 8 3.1 Environmental effects at regional and transboundary level _______________________ 8 3.2 Characteristics of the affected territory_______________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Moldova, Moldavia, Bessarabia Yefim Kogan, 25 September 2015
    Moldova, Moldavia, Bessarabia Yefim Kogan, 25 September 2015 Dear Researchers, I have received recently an email from Marilyn Newman: Hello Yefim, I've been following this project and appreciate your more complete break down in today's Jewishgen Digest. I did contribute to Bob Wascou before he passed. The reason for this message is that I'm confused. My family were from Moinesti and Tirgu Ocna, both near each other in Moldova. However, this area was not Bessarabia..... Can you explain what areas of Moldova are covered other than Bessarabia and Chisanou (sp.). Many Thanks, Marilyn Newman Marilyn thank you. I think this is a very important question. I was getting many similar message for many years. Let’s clear this confusion. Let's start with terminology. The term Moldavia and Moldova mean the same region! Moldova is in Romanian language and Moldavia was adopted by Russian and other languages, including English. Charles King in 'The Moldovans. Romania, Russia, and the Politics of Culture', Stanford U., 1999 writes that 'It is a myth that Moldova changed its name from Moldavia. What happened in the 1990s was simply that we in the West became better informed about what locals themselves had always called it.' So let's dive into the history of the region: Moldavia is known as a country or Principality from 14 century until 1812. There were also two other Danube or Romanian Principalities - Walachia and Transilvania. At some point in the history Moldavia joined other Principalities. In 1538 Moldavia surrendered to Ottoman Empire, and remained under Turks for about 300 years.
    [Show full text]