DOCSLIB.ORG

Activity 2.7: Forestry and Timber Industry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Activity 2.7: Forestry and Timber Industry INTERREG III B CADSES Programme Carpathian Project Activity 2.7: Forestry and timber industry Report on Current State of Forest Resources in the Carpathians ( Working Group: Tommaso Anfodillo Marco Carrer Elena Dalla Valle Elisa Giacoma Silvia Lamedica Davide Pettenella Legnaro, 20 January 2008 UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI PADOVA DIPARTIMENTO TERRITORIO E SISTEMI AGRO-FORESTALI AGRIPOLIS – Viale dell’Università, 16 – 35020 LEGNARO (Padova) Tel. +390498272728-+390498272730 – Fax +3904982722750 – P.IVA 00742430283 Disclaimer: This publication has been produced by the Carpathian Project under the INTERREG III B CADSES Neighbourhood Programme and co-financed by the European Union. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union, of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), of the Carpathian Convention or of the partner institutions. Activity 2.7 Carpathian Project – University of Padova, Dept. TeSAF INDEX INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................5 The Carpathian Convention - SARD-F..............................................................................................................5 Objectives.........................................................................................................................................................5 Methods............................................................................................................................................................5 Overview of forest resources in the Carpathian area......................................................................................13 References .....................................................................................................................................................19 Annex 1: Minutes of the Second meeting of the Working Group on SARD-F of the Carpathian Convention..20 COUNTRY REPORTS....................................................................................................................................25 1. CZECH REPUBLIC.....................................................................................................................................27 1.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................27 1.2 FOREST AREA AND FOREST AREA CHANGE......................................................................................27 1.3 FOREST FUNCTIONS..............................................................................................................................28 1.4 FOREST COMPOSITION.........................................................................................................................28 1.5 FOREST STRUCTURE ............................................................................................................................30 1.6 FOREST MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING ........................................................................................30 1.7 FOREST CONDITIONS............................................................................................................................33 1.8 WOOD SUPPLY .......................................................................................................................................34 1.9 PROTECTED AREAS...............................................................................................................................36 1.10 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................................37 2. HUNGARY..................................................................................................................................................38 2.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................38 2.2 FOREST AREA.........................................................................................................................................39 2.3 FOREST FUNCTIONS..............................................................................................................................40 2.4 FOREST COMPOSITION.........................................................................................................................41 2.5 FOREST STRUCTURE ............................................................................................................................42 2.6 FOREST MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING ........................................................................................43 2.7 FOREST CONDITIONS............................................................................................................................44 2.8 WOOD SUPPLY .......................................................................................................................................45 2.9 PROTECTED AREAS...............................................................................................................................46 2.10 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................................47 3. POLAND .....................................................................................................................................................49 3.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................49 3.2 FOREST AREA AND FOREST AREA CHANGE IN THE CARPATHIANS...............................................50 3.3 FOREST FUNCTIONS..............................................................................................................................50 3.4 STAND COMPOSITION ...........................................................................................................................51 3.5 FOREST STRUCTURE ............................................................................................................................53 3.6 FOREST MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING ........................................................................................54 3.7 FOREST CONDITIONS............................................................................................................................59 3.8 WOOD SUPPLY AND PRODUCTIVE FUNCTION...................................................................................60 3.9 PROTECTIVE FUNCTION........................................................................................................................62 3.10 SOCIAL FUNCTION ...............................................................................................................................64 3.11 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................................64 3.12 ANNEX 1: Complete list of protected areas in the Polish Carpathians....................................................65 4 ROMANIA ....................................................................................................................................................68 Activity 2.7 Carpathian Project – University of Padova, Dept. TeSAF 4.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................68 4.2 FOREST AREA AND FOREST AREA CHANGE......................................................................................69 4.3 FOREST FUNCTIONS..............................................................................................................................70 4.4 FOREST STAND COMPOSITION............................................................................................................70 4.5 FOREST STRUCTURE ............................................................................................................................72 4.6 FOREST MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING ........................................................................................75 4.7 FOREST CONDITION ..............................................................................................................................77 4.8 WOOD SUPPLY .......................................................................................................................................83 4.9 PROTECTIVE FUNCTION........................................................................................................................88 4. 10 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................................92 4.11 ANNEX 1: Protected areas in the Romanian Carpathians ......................................................................93 5 SERBIA........................................................................................................................................................95 5.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................95 5.2 DJERDAP NATIONAL PARK....................................................................................................................96 5.1.1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Landscape Character of the Crofts Vrbovce and Chvojnica (Southern Part of White Carpathians in Slovakia) K Atarína Demková
    AUC Geographica 45 ThE LandscapE ChAracter Of ThE CrOfTs vrbOvce and Chvojnica (SouthErN ParT Of White CArpathians iN slOvakiA) k atarÍna demková charles university in prague, Faculty of science, department of physical geography and geoecology AbstrAct the landscape character has become a topical issue in many european countries as well as in the czech republic and in slovakia in the 90s. since that period a lot of scientists and experts of various disciplines have been solving problems of the landscape character, the ques- tion of its terminology and evaluation. the article is based on results of a master thesis, which deals with preventive landscape character assessment (LCA). Proposed methodology of LCA was applied in the southwestern part of Biele Karpaty Mountains (White carpathians) in Western slovakia. the model area is interesting because of the unique cultural landscape with characteristic dispersed settlement and mainly extensive farming. A part overlaps with the landscape Protected area White carpathians, whose boundary has changed during the time. consequently more valuable places have been separated from less valuable areas from the aspect of nature and landscape protection. one of the aims of the master thesis was whether it applied to the landscape character as well. Key words: landscape character, landscape character assessment, landscape unit, landscape area, White carpathians 1. Introduction appearance, which depends on the actual and long-term changes and movements in landscape such as weather Landscape character is defined as natural, cultural and seasons. and historical characteristics of place or area according in context with landscape character the term genius to the law of nature and landscape protection (§ 12 of loci is often used.
    [Show full text]
  • POLAND: COUNTRY REPORT to the FAO INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL CONFERENCE on PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES (Leipzig 1996)
    POLAND: COUNTRY REPORT TO THE FAO INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL CONFERENCE ON PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES (Leipzig 1996) Prepared by: Wieslaw Podyma Barbara Janik-Janiec Radzikow, June 1995 POLAND country report 2 Note by FAO This Country Report has been prepared by the national authorities in the context of the preparatory process for the FAO International Technical Conference on Plant Genetic Resources, Leipzig, Germany, 17-23 June 1996. The Report is being made available by FAO as requested by the International Technical Conference. However, the report is solely the responsibility of the national authorities. The information in this report has not been verified by FAO, and the opinions expressed do not necessarily represent the views or policy of FAO. The designations employed and the presentation of the material and maps in this document do not imply the expression of any option whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. POLAND country report 3 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 THE COUNTRY AND ITS AGRICULTURAL SECTOR 6 1.1 THE COUNTRY 6 1.2 AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN POLAND 8 CHAPTER 2 INDIGENOUS PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES 12 2.1 FLORA OF POLAND 12 2.2 FOREST GENETIC RESOURCES 37 2.3 WILD AND CROPS-RELATED SPECIES 38 2.4 LANDRACES AND OLD CULTIVARS 40 CHAPTER 3 CONSERVATION ACTIVITIES 42 3.1 IN SITU PRESERVATION OF GENETIC RESOURCES 42 3.2 EX SITU COLLECTIONS 45 3.2.1 Sample
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement History and Sustainability in the Carpathians in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Settlement history and sustainability in the Carpathians in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries Turnock, David Geography Department, The University, Leicester 21 June 2005 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/26955/ MPRA Paper No. 26955, posted 24 Nov 2010 20:24 UTC Review of Historical Geography and Toponomastics, vol. I, no.1, 2006, pp 31-60 SETTLEMENT HISTORY AND SUSTAINABILITY IN THE CARPATHIANS IN THE EIGHTEENTH AND NINETEENTH CENTURIES David TURNOCK* ∗ Geography Department, The University Leicester LE1 7RH, U.K. Abstract: As part of a historical study of the Carpathian ecoregion, to identify salient features of the changing human geography, this paper deals with the 18th and 19th centuries when there was a large measure political unity arising from the expansion of the Habsburg Empire. In addition to a growth of population, economic expansion - particularly in the railway age - greatly increased pressure on resources: evident through peasant colonisation of high mountain surfaces (as in the Apuseni Mountains) as well as industrial growth most evident in a number of metallurgical centres and the logging activity following the railway alignments through spruce-fir forests. Spa tourism is examined and particular reference is made to the pastoral economy of the Sibiu area nourished by long-wave transhumance until more stringent frontier controls gave rise to a measure of diversification and resettlement. It is evident that ecological risk increased, with some awareness of the need for conservation, although substantial innovations did not occur until after the First World War Rezumat: Ca parte componentă a unui studiu asupra ecoregiunii carpatice, pentru a identifica unele caracteristici privitoare la transformările din domeniul geografiei umane, acest articol se referă la secolele XVIII şi XIX când au existat măsuri politice unitare ale unui Imperiu Habsburgic aflat în expansiune.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection of Tick-Borne Pathogens of the Genera Rickettsia, Anaplasma and Francisella in Ixodes Ricinus Ticks in Pomerania (Poland)
    pathogens Article Detection of Tick-Borne Pathogens of the Genera Rickettsia, Anaplasma and Francisella in Ixodes ricinus Ticks in Pomerania (Poland) Lucyna Kirczuk 1 , Mariusz Piotrowski 2 and Anna Rymaszewska 2,* 1 Department of Hydrobiology, Faculty of Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Szczecin, Felczaka 3c Street, 71-412 Szczecin, Poland; [email protected] 2 Department of Genetics and Genomics, Faculty of Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Szczecin, Felczaka 3c Street, 71-412 Szczecin, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Tick-borne pathogens are an important medical and veterinary issue worldwide. Environ- mental monitoring in relation to not only climate change but also globalization is currently essential. The present study aimed to detect tick-borne pathogens of the genera Anaplasma, Rickettsia and Francisella in Ixodes ricinus ticks collected from the natural environment, i.e., recreational areas and pastures used for livestock grazing. A total of 1619 specimens of I. ricinus were collected, including ticks of all life stages (adults, nymphs and larvae). The study was performed using the PCR technique. Diagnostic gene fragments msp2 for Anaplasma, gltA for Rickettsia and tul4 for Francisella were ampli- fied. No Francisella spp. DNA was detected in I. ricinus. DNA of A. phagocytophilum was detected in 0.54% of ticks and Rickettsia spp. in 3.69%. Nucleotide sequence analysis revealed that only one species of Rickettsia, R. helvetica, was present in the studied tick population. The present results are a Citation: Kirczuk, L.; Piotrowski, M.; part of a large-scale analysis aimed at monitoring the level of tick infestation in Northwest Poland.
    [Show full text]
  • Under the State Forests Management: 20,8% 27,8% 29,3% • 7.2 Million Ha
    Managing forests: thinking big and creatively 22nd COFO, Rome, June 2014 FOREST COVERAGE IN EUROPE SoEF 2011) 2 FORESTS IN POLAND Changes in forest area and coverage in Poland • Forest area in Poland: 9.3 million ha • Under The State Forests management: 20,8% 27,8% 29,3% • 7.2 million ha 1946 1990 2013 total In The State Forests 3 WOOD RESOURCES IN EUROPE SoEF 2011) 4 The State Forests organizational units operate on nationwide, regional and local levels. We employ 25.000 people and are the biggest organization of this kind in the European Union Our revenues exceed 1.8 billion euro. In around 90% they come from wood sales. Due to a special financial mechanism we are economically independent and don’t rely on taxpayers suppor 5 THE STATE FORESTS OF POLAND: FOR FOREST, FOR PEOPLE Protective function Social function Productive function WE MANAGE FORESTS SUSTAINABLY 6 DECISION SUPPORTING SYSTEM FOR MONITORING OF MOUNTAIN FORESTS Aerial laser scanning: 6 (10) p/m2 fullwave Aerial Photography: ortophotomaps (20 cm resolution), off-nadir (skew) photos Satellite imagery: 3 times a year (2012-2016) Project implementation area covering 12 mountain forest districts in the Sudetes and the Beskids (310 000 hectares) 7 DECISION SUPPORTING SYSTEM FOR MONITORING OF MOUNTAIN FORESTS Laser scanning as a source of stands Photorealistic terrain model and forest increament thus biomas presenting the mountain forests in a and carbon storage dedicated online service 8 DECISION SUPPORTING SYSTEM FOR MONITORING OF MOUNTAIN FORESTS Wood flow analysis for the first
    [Show full text]
  • The Miocene from Buzău Area
    THE MIOCENE FROM BUZĂU AREA A GEOLOGICAL AND GEOCONSERVATION PERSPECTIVE Marius Stoica Alexandru Andrășanu Dan Palcu Răzvan Gabriel Popa The 11th Romanian Symposium on Palaeontology Bucharest, September 25-30, 2017 Marius Stoica Alexandru Andrășanu Dan Palcu Răzvan Gabriel Popa THE MIOCENE FROM BUZĂU AREA A GEOLOGICAL AND GEOCONSERVATION PERSPECTIVE 2017 Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Naţionale a României The Miocene from Buzău area : a geological and geoconservation perspective / Marius Stoica, Alexandru Andrăşanu, Dan Palcu, Răzvan Gabriel Popa. - Bucureşti : Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti, 2017 Conţine bibliografie ISBN 978-606-16-0913-0 I. Stoica, Marius II. Andrăşanu, Alexandru III. Palcu, Dan IV. Popa, Răzvan-Gabriel 55 Copyright © Marius Stoica, Alexandru Andrășanu, Dan Palcu, Răzvan Gabriel Popa, 2017 Tiparit la S.C. MRT Marketing Research and Training S.R.L Printed in Romania THE MIOCENE FROM BUZĂU AREA A GEOLOGICAL AND GEOCONSERVATION PERSPECTIVE Marius Stoica Alexandru Andrășanu Dan Palcu Răzvan Gabriel Popa Revised version with supplementary data of the “Neogene deposits in the South-Eastern Carpathians- Field Trip Guide”, by Marius Stoica, Mihaela C. Melinte-Dobrinescu and Dan Palcu, 2012 2017 Table of Contents Geology of the Carpathians ................................................................................................ 7 The Eastern Carpathians .................................................................................................... 9 The Dacian Basin ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • European Primary Forest Database (EPFD) V2.0
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.30.362434; this version posted October 30, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 European Primary Forest Database (EPFD) v2.0 2 Authors 3 Francesco Maria Sabatini1,2†; Hendrik Bluhm3; Zoltan Kun4; Dmitry Aksenov5; José A. Atauri6; 4 Erik Buchwald7; Sabina Burrascano8; Eugénie Cateau9; Abdulla Diku10; Inês Marques Duarte11; 5 Ángel B. Fernández López12; Matteo Garbarino13; Nikolaos Grigoriadis14; Ferenc Horváth15; 6 Srđan Keren16; Mara Kitenberga17; Alen Kiš18; Ann Kraut19; Pierre L. Ibisch20; Laurent 7 Larrieu21,22; Fabio Lombardi23; Bratislav Matovic24; Radu Nicolae Melu25; Peter Meyer26; Rein Affiliations 1 German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) - Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Germany [email protected]; ORCID 0000-0002-7202-7697 2 Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Institut für Biologie. Am Kirchtor 1, 06108 Halle, Germany 3 Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Geography Department, Unter den Linden 6, 10099, Berlin, Germany. [email protected]. 0000-0001-7809-3321 4 Frankfurt Zoological Society 5 NGO "Transparent World", Rossolimo str. 5/22, building 1, 119021, Moscow, Russia 6 EUROPARC-Spain/Fundación Fernando González Bernáldez. ICEI Edificio A. Campus de Somosaguas. E28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain. [email protected] 7 The Danish Nature Agency, Gjøddinggård, Førstballevej 2, DK-7183 Randbøl, Denmark; [email protected]. ORCID 0000-0002-5590-6390 8 Sapienza University of Rome, Department of Environmental Biology, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Romanian Association of Geomorphologists Revista De
    ROMANIAN ASSOCIATION OF GEOMORPHOLOGISTS REVISTA DE GEOMORFOLOGIE 18 editura universității din bucurești 2016 Revista de Geomorfologie 18/2016 Editor-in-Chief: Maria Rădoane, University of Suceava, Romania Guest Editors: Lóczy Dénes, University of Pecs, Hungary, Slavoljub Dragićević, University of Belgrade, Serbia Sandu Boengiu, University of Craiova, Romania Editorial Board Achim Beylich, Geological Survey of Norway (NGU), Geo-Environment Division, Norway Alfred Vespremeanu-Stroe, University of Bucharest Armelle Decaulne, Université de Nantes, Laboratoire GEOLITTOMER UMR - 6554 CNRSLETG, France Aurel Perșoiu, Institute of Speology Emil Racovita, Cluj Napoca Ciprian Mărgărint, Al I Cuza University of Iassy Dan Dumitriu, Al I Cuza University of Iassy Daniel Germain, Université du Québec à Montréal, Département de Géographie, Canada Dănuț Petrea, Babeș Bolyai University of Cluj Napoca Floare Grecu, University of Bucharest Francisca Chiriloaei, University of Suceava Hans-Balder Havenith, Université de Liège, Belgia Ian Evans, University of Durham, United Kingdom Ion Ioniță, Al I Cuza University of Iassy Jean-Philippe Malet, Université de Strasbourg, France Laura Comănescu, University of Bucharest Lucian Drăguț, West University of Timisoara Marta Jurchescu, Institute of Geography, Bucharest Mauro Soldati, Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Italy Mihai Micu, Institute of Geography, Bucharest Mircea Voiculescu, West University of Timisoara Nicolae Cruceru, Spiru Haret University Olimpiu Pop, University Babeș Bolyai of Cluj Napoca
    [Show full text]
  • Forests in Poland 2013 Forests in Poland 2013 Poland in Forests
    FORESTS IN POLAND 2013 FORESTS IN POLAND 2013 State Forests 1 Forests in Poland 2013 The Forest Act of 28 September 1991 requires that the State Forests publish an annual report on the condition of forests in Poland. This brochure is a shortened version of the report for 2012, which is based on the materials obtained from the Ministry of the Environment, the Directorate-General of the State Forests, the Forest Research Institute, the Forest Management and Geodesy Bureau, the Central Statistical Office and on international statistics. The report details the condition of Polish forests under all forms of ownership in 2012 in the context of the data from recent years. Where it was possible and justified, the report refers to the data from other countries whose natural conditions are comparable to those in Poland: France, the German-speaking countries (Austria, Germany, Switzerland), Central European countries (the Czech Republic, Romania, Slovakia and Hungary), the eastern neighbours of Poland (Belarus, Lithuania, Ukraine) and the Scandinavian countries (Finland, Norway, Sweden) which represent different types of forestry to that established in Central Europe). The scope of the report includes three groups of issues: forest resources in Poland, functions of forests and threats to the forest environment. FORESTS IN POLAND 2013 2 Forest resources in Poland 1. Forest area and forest cover In our climatic and geographical zone, forests are the least dis- torted natural formation. They are a necessary element of eco- logical balance and, at the same time, a form of land use which ensures biological production with a market value. Forests are the common good which enhances the quality of human life.
    [Show full text]
  • Chalcolithic Settlement Strategies of the Bošáca Culture in the White Carpathians
    International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 10, Issue 1, January-2019 1159 ISSN 2229-5518 Chalcolithic settlement strategies of the Bošáca culture in the White Carpathians Filip Ondrkál1 1Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Arts, Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic Abstract– The paper observes the system strategies of the Bošáca archaeological culture (3200-2800 BC) in the White Carpathians microregion and its adaptation to environmental conditions in order to understand how they could affect its settlement development. The Bošáca intercultural conditions in the relatively small area of the White Carpathians appear to be quite variable (type of settlement, funeral rituals), which can be assumed in the economic aspects of society. In this context, it is necessary to perceive specific sources of the radiolarite in the area of the Vlára pass, because it can be very closely related to the contrasting settlement strategies of one culture in the microregion. This element could increase the local centrality of the society, where this culture have been creating a specific product range for regional and long-distance trade. Index Terms– The Bošáca culture, radiolarite, The White Carpathians, settlement strategies, long-distance trade, Bošáca – Pohanské pole, Bánov – Hrad, Ivanovce – Skala 1 INTRODUCTION point of view of potential discoveries of new Chalcolithic sites, it is necessary to observe this Carpathians region. The White Carpathians microregion is an ideal area for studying this type of research not only for
    [Show full text]
  • Background and Introduction
    Chapter One: Background and Introduction Chapter One Background and Introduction title chapter page 17 © Libor Vojtíšek, Ján Lacika, Jan W. Jongepier, Florentina Pop CHAPTER?INDD Chapter One: Background and Introduction he Carpathian Mountains encompass Their total length of 1,500 km is greater than that many unique landscapes, and natural and of the Alps at 1,000 km, the Dinaric Alps at 800 Tcultural sites, in an expression of both km and the Pyrenees at 500 km (Dragomirescu geographical diversity and a distinctive regional 1987). The Carpathians’ average altitude, how- evolution of human-environment relations over ever, of approximately 850 m. is lower compared time. In this KEO Report, the “Carpathian to 1,350 m. in the Alps. The northwestern and Region” is defined as the Carpathian Mountains southern parts, with heights over 2,000 m., are and their surrounding areas. The box below the highest and most massive, reaching their offers a full explanation of the different delimi- greatest elevation at Slovakia’s Gerlachovsky tations or boundaries of the Carpathian Mountain Peak (2,655 m.). region and how the chain itself and surrounding areas relate to each other. Stretching like an arc across Central Europe, they span seven countries starting from the The Carpathian Mountains are the largest, Czech Republic in the northwest, then running longest and most twisted and fragmented moun- east and southwards through Slovakia, Poland, tain chain in Europe. Their total surface area is Hungary, Ukraine and Romania, and finally 161,805 sq km1, far greater than that of the Alps Serbia in the Carpathians’ extreme southern at 140,000 sq km.
    [Show full text]
  • E-Bulletin Issue 25 · March 2011
    IUCN SEE e-Bulletin Issue 25 · March 2011 IUCN South-Eastern European e-Bulletin Photo: Vladimir Dobretic Dear Readers, It is our pleasure to share with you the 25th issue of IUCN South-Eastern European e-Bulletin! We are already for three months celebrating 2011 – International Year of Forests, and all that’s wonderful about the world’s forests - jungles, woods and mangroves - and what they mean for the well-being of people and the planet. We thank you for contributing to this issue and for your continuous interest in this publication. Please note that the bulletin is available online at www.iucn.org/southeasterneurope, while guidelines for submitting articles can be found at the last page of this issue. We wish you a pleasant reading! IUCN Programme Office for South-Eastern Europe IUCN SEE e-Bulletin Issue 25 · March 2011 NEWS & EVENTS t 1. IUCN Red List: Expertise for experts 2. Heart of Romanian Carpathians to become model for protected areas management EN 3. Last chance to save Croatian rivers t 4. Setting-up the Emerald Network N 5. Zvezdara forest protection o 6. Marine Protected Areas Network in Croatia 7. Dragash municipality: biodiversity assessment and recommendations C 8. Management Plan for the Special Nature Reserve Zasavica completed 9. Natura 2000 in Albania 10. European Tree of the Year for 2011 11. Conservation of Long-eared Owl winter roosts 12. EKOsovo – Development through Biodiversity 13. Further lynx habitat along the European Green Belt to be protected soon? 14. EUROPARC meets NP Djerdap 15. The STAR Project workshop held 16.
    [Show full text]