DOCSLIB.ORG

A Grammar of Kusaal Agolle Dialect

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Grammar of Kusaal Agolle Dialect A Grammar of Kusaal Agolle Dialect David Eddyshaw i Contents Preface.................................................................................................................... viii Abbreviations............................................................................................................. x Interlinear glossing...................................................................................................xi Transcription conventions........................................................................................xii Sources.................................................................................................................... xiii Other studies of Kusaal............................................................................................xv References/Bibliography.........................................................................................xvi 1 Kusaal and the Kusaasi..............................................................................................1 1.1 The Kusaasi people.............................................................................................1 1.2 The Kusaal language...........................................................................................4 1.2.1 Status...........................................................................................................4 1.2.2 Dialects........................................................................................................5 1.2.3 Related languages........................................................................................6 1.2.4 Grammatical sketch...................................................................................11 Morphophonemics....................................................................................................... 23 2 Preliminaries............................................................................................................ 23 2.1 Rule order.........................................................................................................23 2.2 Morae, syllables and stress...............................................................................23 2.3 Free and bound words......................................................................................24 2.4 Word division.................................................................................................... 25 3 Segments................................................................................................................. 28 3.1 Consonants........................................................................................................28 3.2 Vowels............................................................................................................... 31 3.2.1 Agolle vowel breaking................................................................................33 3.2.2 Nasalisation...............................................................................................34 3.2.3 Glottalisation..............................................................................................35 3.2.4 Diphthongs.................................................................................................37 3.3 Traditional orthography....................................................................................38 4 Tones........................................................................................................................ 40 4.1 Tonemes............................................................................................................40 4.2 Toneme delinking..............................................................................................43 5 Word segmental structure.......................................................................................46 5.1 Apocope............................................................................................................ 46 5.1.1 Superscript notation..................................................................................49 5.1.2 Predictability of Long Forms......................................................................52 5.2 Roots, stems and flexions..................................................................................54 5.3 Root alternations...............................................................................................57 5.3.1 CV~CVV~CVC...........................................................................................57 5.3.2 CVVC~CVC................................................................................................64 5.4 Consonant cluster assimilation.........................................................................65 5.5 Deletion of *g with vowel fusion.......................................................................70 5.6 Diphthongisation before *-ya *-gʋ *-kkʋ *-ŋŋʋ..................................................73 5.7 Vowel length constraints...................................................................................76 5.8 Apocope-blocking..............................................................................................77 ii 6 Word tonal structure................................................................................................78 6.1 Tone Patterns....................................................................................................78 6.2 Nominals...........................................................................................................80 6.2.1 Pattern H....................................................................................................81 6.2.1.1 Tonal effects of deleted morae............................................................82 6.2.1.2 Subpattern HL....................................................................................83 6.2.2 Pattern L....................................................................................................83 6.2.3 Pattern O....................................................................................................85 6.2.4 Noun prefixes.............................................................................................86 6.3 Verbs................................................................................................................. 87 6.3.1 Pattern H....................................................................................................87 6.3.2 Pattern LO..................................................................................................89 6.4 Particles............................................................................................................ 90 6.5 Tone in derivation.............................................................................................91 7 External sandhi........................................................................................................ 93 7.1 Prosodic clitics..................................................................................................93 7.1.1 Long Forms in clause adjuncts..................................................................97 7.2 Liaison words....................................................................................................98 7.2.1 Vowel quality changes..............................................................................102 7.2.2 Toneme changes......................................................................................106 7.2.3 The pronoun ya before liaison..................................................................110 7.3 M spreading....................................................................................................111 7.3.1 Fixed L tonemes.......................................................................................113 7.4 L spreading.....................................................................................................114 7.5 Segmental contact phenomena.......................................................................117 7.5.1 Consonants..............................................................................................117 7.5.2 Vowels......................................................................................................118 Morphology................................................................................................................ 121 8 Noun flexion........................................................................................................... 121 8.1 Noun classes...................................................................................................121 8.2 Remodelled combining forms.........................................................................124 8.3 Noun paradigms..............................................................................................125 8.3.1 a|ba class..................................................................................................126 8.3.1.1 ba singular........................................................................................129 8.3.2 ga|sɛ class.................................................................................................129 8.3.3 gɔ|dɛ class.................................................................................................132 8.3.4 rɛ|a+ class.................................................................................................135 8.3.4.1 lɛ singular..........................................................................................137
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MANDE LANGUAGES INTRODUCTION Mande Languages
    Article details Article author(s): Dmitry Idiatov Table of contents: Introduction General Overviews Textbooks Bibliographies Journals and Book Series Conferences Text Collections and Corpora Classifications Historical and Comparative Linguistics Western Mande Central Mande Southwestern Mande and Susu- Yalunka Soninke-Bozo, Samogo, and Bobo Southeastern Mande Eastern Mande Southern Mande Phonetics Phonology Morphosyntax Morphology Syntax Language Contact and Areal Linguistics Writing Systems MANDE LANGUAGES INTRODUCTION Mande languages are spoken across much of inland West Africa up to the northwest of Nigeria as their eastern limit. The center of gravity of the Mande-speaking world is situated in the southwest of Mali and the neighboring regions. There are approximately seventy Mande languages. Mande languages have long been recognized as a coherent group. Thanks to both a sufficient number of clear lexical correspondences and the remarkable uniformity in basic morphosyntax, the attribution of a given language to Mande is usually straightforward. The major subdivision within Mande is between Western Mande, which comprises the majority of both languages and speakers, and Southeastern Mande (aka Southern Mande or Eastern Mande, which are also the names for the two subbranches of Southeastern Mande), a comparatively small but linguistically diverse and geographically dispersed group. Traditionally, Mande languages have been classified as one of the earliest offshoots of Niger-Congo. However, their external affiliation still remains a working hypothesis rather than an established fact. One of the most well-known Mande languages is probably Bamana (aka Bambara), as well as some of its close relatives, which in nonlinguistic publications are sometimes indiscriminately referred to as Mandingo. Mande languages are written in a variety of scripts ranging from Latin-based or Arabic-based alphabets to indigenously developed scripts, both syllabic and alphabetic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence of Hausa As a National Lingua Franca in Niger
    Ahmed Draia University – Adrar Université Ahmed Draia Adrar-Algérie Faculty of Letters and Languages Department of English Letters and Language A Research Paper Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Master’s Degree in Linguistics and Didactics The Emergence of Hausa as a National Lingua Franca in Niger Presented by: Supervised by: Moussa Yacouba Abdoul Aziz Pr. Bachir Bouhania Academic Year: 2015-2016 Abstract The present research investigates the causes behind the emergence of Hausa as a national lingua franca in Niger. Precisely, the research seeks to answer the question as to why Hausa has become a lingua franca in Niger. To answer this question, a sociolinguistic approach of language spread or expansion has been adopted to see whether it applies to the Hausa language. It has been found that the emergence of Hausa as a lingua franca is mainly attributed to geo-historical reasons such as the rise of Hausa states in the fifteenth century, the continuous processes of migration in the seventeenth century which resulted in cultural and linguistic assimilation, territorial expansion brought about by the spread of Islam in the nineteenth century, and the establishment of long-distance trade by the Hausa diaspora. Moreover, the status of Hausa as a lingua franca has recently been maintained by socio- cultural factors represented by the growing use of the language for commercial and cultural purposes as well as its significance in education and media. These findings arguably support the sociolinguistic view regarding the impact of society on language expansion, that the widespread use of language is highly determined by social factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Berkeley Linguistics Society
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING OF THE BERKELEY LINGUISTICS SOCIETY February 18-20, 2005 SPECIAL SESSION on LANGUAGES OF WEST AFRICA Edited by Rebecca T. Cover and Yuni Kim Berkeley Linguistics Society Berkeley, CA, USA Berkeley Linguistics Society University of California, Berkeley Department of Linguistics 1203 Dwinelle Hall Berkeley, CA 94720-2650 USA All papers copyright © 2006 by the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Inc. All rights reserved. ISSN 0363-2946 LCCN 76-640143 Printed by Sheridan Books 100 N. Staebler Road Ann Arbor, MI 48103 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS A note regarding the contents of this volume ...................................................... iv Foreword............................................................................................................. v SPECIAL SESSION Interpreting Yorùbá Bare Nouns as Generic......................................................... 1 OLADIIPO AJIBOYE Divergent Structure in Ogonoid Languages ....................................................... 13 OLIVER BOND and GREGORY D. ANDERSON A Fixed Hierarchy for Wolof Verbal Affixes..................................................... 25 LESTON BUELL and MARIAME SY S-O-V-X Constituent Order and Constituent Order Alternations in West African Languages ......................................................................................................... 37 DENIS CREISSELS Nupe Coordinate Structures: A Syntactically Heterogeneous Class.................... 53 JASON KANDYBOWICZ Emai’s Aspect-Causative Interaction ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Marketing Fragment 6 X 10.T65
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-87611-7 - A Linguistic Geography of Africa Edited by Bernd Heine and Derek Nurse Index More information Index Aari 277 consonant types 40–1 ablative, grammaticalization 235–6, 237–8 distinctively African characteristics 26 accusative case marking 253 distribution of case languages 251 accusative languages 253, 254 distribution of typological properties 31 Adamawa languages 31 documentation of languages 86, 103, 153, Adamawa-Ubangi languages 18 224 ATR vowel harmony 158 genetic relationships among languages 12, features of the Macro-Sudan belt 167 34 labial flaps 165 history of 1 labial-velar stops 157 phonological features 10 in the Macro-Sudan belt 178 prosodic features 68–80 minimal-augmented pronoun systems 169 relative frequency of typological properties question intonation 79 29 word order 161, 162, 164, 167 segmental features 39–68 adjectives 125–6, 279 specific properties 10, 28–34 paucity of 21 typological features 11 position of 279 typological relationships among 1 possibilities of expansion 125 variation space 36 reduplication of 21 African linguistics, history of 170–4 adpositions 124–5, 145, 280 genealogical super-group 173–4 adverbs 126, 237, 304 Greenberg’s nuclear African area 172–3 Afar 140 morpholosyntactic features 11, 148 Afitti 285 Niger-Kordofanian þ Nilo-Saharan Africa 15–33 super-group 173–4 ‘‘Africanisms’’ 19–27 Westermann’s Sudansprachen 170–2 as an areal-typological unit 10 ‘‘Africanisms’’ 18, 19–27, 39 comparative linguistics 17–18 gender or noun class systems 19 evidence for
    [Show full text]
  • History in Complexartworks Could Be, How They Were Both Intellectualand Visceral, Dramaticand Subtle
    tA7 - PHOTO: THE UNIVERSITYOF IOWAMUSEUM OF ART I was an early Arnold student, the result of his three non-Westernsurvey courses. As an undergraduate Is There senior I had taken classes in Easternand all sorts of Westernart, but I had never thought about or really even lookedat the arts of Africa, the Americas,or Oceania. Arnold was electrifying.For me he showed how History in complexartworks could be, how they were both intellectualand visceral, dramaticand subtle. He made art's importanceevident, and I appreciatedthat Horizontalimmensely. By then I had takenseveral studio courses, and I was nearly committedto graduate school in design. Arnold convertedme. As a first-year graduate student with him, I Masks? rememberour lively and provocativeseminars, and all the special speakershe broughtfor us to experience.But I also rememberafternoons and weekends,going with A Preliminary him to used-bookstores and a gun shop where wonderfulAfrican iron workshad ended up for sale. We went to a giant warehouseof old booksin Long Beach.I Response grew up in L.A. but had never gone to the place. He on the other hand had arrivedfrom the Midwest and made a beelinefor it, and so could takehis graduate students to the Dilemma directly to the spot where some six copies of The Secret Museum of Mankind sat patiently. These sorts of things, combinedwith my time with Arnold on campus, of Form madebeing his student especiallymemorable. PATRICKR. McNAUGHTON 40 The contemplation of forms has elements in their social realities, this of the horizontal mask into the northern inspired this essay, causing me to unity prompts a question worthy of fur- savanna of Central Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • SIGMORPHON 2020 Shared Task 0: Typologically Diverse Morphological Inflection Ekaterina Vylomova@ Jennifer Whiteq Elizabeth Saleskyz Sabrina J
    SIGMORPHON 2020 Shared Task 0: Typologically Diverse Morphological Inflection Ekaterina Vylomova@ Jennifer WhiteQ Elizabeth SaleskyZ Sabrina J. MielkeZ Shijie WuZ Edoardo PontiQ Rowan Hall MaudslayQ Ran ZmigrodQ Josef ValvodaQ Svetlana ToldovaE Francis TyersI;E Elena KlyachkoE Ilya YegorovM Natalia KrizhanovskyK Paula CzarnowskaQ Irene NikkarinenQ Andrew KrizhanovskyK Tiago PimentelQ Lucas Torroba HennigenQ Christo Kirov5 Garrett Nicolaiá Adina WilliamsF Antonios Anastasopoulosì Hilaria CruzL Eleanor Chodroff7 Ryan CotterellQ;D Miikka Silfverbergá Mans HuldenX @University of Melbourne QUniversity of Cambridge ZJohns Hopkins University EHigher School of Economics MMoscow State University KKarelian Research Centre 5Google AI áUniversity of British Columbia FFacebook AI Research ìCarnegie Mellon University IIndiana University LUniversity of Louisville 7University of York DETH Zürich XUniversity of Colorado Boulder [email protected] [email protected] Abstract 1950 and more recently, List et al., 2016), gram- matical features, and even abstract implications A broad goal in natural language processing (NLP) is to develop a system that has the capac- (proposed in Greenberg, 1963), each language nev- ity to process any natural language. Most sys- ertheless has a unique evolutionary trajectory that tems, however, are developed using data from is affected by geographic, social, cultural, and just one language such as English. The SIG- other factors. As a result, the surface form of MORPHON 2020 shared task on morpholog- languages varies substantially. The morphology ical reinflection aims to investigate systems’ of languages can differ in many ways: Some ability to generalize across typologically dis- exhibit rich grammatical case systems (e.g., 12 tinct languages, many of which are low re- in Erzya and 24 in Veps) and mark possessive- source.
    [Show full text]
  • African Linguistics Across the Disciplines
    African linguistics across the disciplines Selected papers from the 48th Annual Conference on African Linguistics Edited by Samson Lotven Silvina Bongiovanni Phillip Weirich Robert Botne Samuel Gyasi Obeng language Contemporary African Linguistics 5 science press Contemporary African Linguistics Editors: Akinbiyi Akinlabi, Laura J. Downing In this series: 1. Payne, Doris L., Sara Pacchiarotti & Mokaya Bosire (eds.). Diversity in African languages: Selected papers from the 46th Annual Conference on African Linguistics. 2. Persohn, Bastian. The verb in Nyakyusa: A focus on tense, aspect and modality. 3. Kandybowicz, Jason, Travis Major & Harold Torrence (eds.). African linguistics on the prairie: Selected papers from the 45th Annual Conference on African Linguistics. 4. Clem, Emily, Peter Jenks & Hannah Sande (eds.). Theory and description in African Linguistics: Selected papers from the 47th Annual Conference on African Linguistics. 5. Lotven, Samson, Silvina Bongiovanni, Phillip Weirich, Robert Botne & Samuel Gyasi Obeng (eds.). African linguistics across the disciplines: Selected papers from the 48th Annual Conference on African Linguistics. ISSN: 2511-7726 African linguistics across the disciplines Selected papers from the 48th Annual Conference on African Linguistics Edited by Samson Lotven Silvina Bongiovanni Phillip Weirich Robert Botne Samuel Gyasi Obeng language science press Lotven, Samson, Silvina Bongiovanni, Phillip Weirich, Robert Botne & Samuel Gyasi Obeng (ed.). 2019. African linguistics across the disciplines: Selected papers
    [Show full text]
  • Eleventh Creolistics Workshop
    Eleventh Creolistics Workshop Assessing old assumptions New insights on the dynamics of contact languages University of Gießen, Germany 23 to 25 March 2017 We gratefully acknowledge the support of John Benjamins Publishing Company Organising Team: Caroline Hoppe Magnus Huber Dmytro Iakovenko Melvy Imami Dieter Laufer Damaris Neuhof Annette Obert-Sochor Adrijana Repac Jasmin Ruckelshaußen Christine Stuka Viveka Velupillai Lena Wilhelm Contents 1. Programme outline _________________________ 1 2. List of Participants __________________________ 3 3. Map _______________________________________ 6 4. General Information ________________________ 8 5. Abstracts _________________________________ 13 6. Timetables for Gießen city buses and trains to Frankfurt Airport __________________________ 90 Eleventh Creolistics Workshop 1. Programme outline Time Wednesday 22 March 2017 19:30 Workshop warm-up at Restaurant Pizza Pie Time Thursday 23 March 2017 08:30- Registration 09:00 09:00- Welcome 09:30 09:30- Session 1a Session 1b 11:00 11:00 – 11:30 Coffee break 11:30- Session 2a Session 2b 13:00 13:00 – 14:30 Lunch break 14:30- Session 3a Session 3b 16:00 16:00 – 16:30 Coffee break 16:30 Language Disco 1 University of Giessen, Germany Time Friday 24 March 2017 09:30- Session 1a Session 1b 10:30 10:30 – 11:00 Coffee break 11:00- Session 2a Session 2b 12:30 12:30 – 14:00 Lunch break 14:00- Session 3a Session 3b 15:30 15:30 – 16:00 Coffee break 16:00- Session 4a Session 4b 17:30 19:30 Conference dinner at Restaurant Alt Giessen Time Saturday 25 March 2017 09:30- Session 1 11:00 11:00 – 11:30 Coffee break 11:30- Session 2 12:30 13:00 Workshop wrap-up at Restaurant Aspendos 2 2.
    [Show full text]
  • An Areal Typology of Nasal Vowels in West Africa
    An Areal Typology of Nasal Vowels in West Africa Nicholas Rolle University of California, Berkeley 8th World Congress of African Linguistics (WOCAL8) Aug 20-24, 2015 Kyoto University, Japan An Areal Typology of Nasal Vowels in West and Central Africa Nicholas Rolle University of California, Berkeley 8th World Congress of African Linguistics (WOCAL8) Aug 20-24, 2015 Kyoto University, Japan Contrastive nasal vowels in West Africa and Central Africa • Nasality as a robust feature of West and Central African phonological systems • Contributed significantly to previous descriptively and theoretically oriented Africanist work • E.g. Hyman (1972), Williamson (1973), Maddieson (1984, 2007), Bole-Richard (1985), Clements (2000), Clements & Rialland (2006), Miehe (2013), among many others Rolle – WOCAL8 3 Africa as (a) Linguistic Area(s) • Greenberg’s (1959) work on “Africa as a Linguistic Area” • Later work in Welmers (1973), Heine (1976), Gregersen (1977), Houis (1980), and Greenberg (1983) Rolle – WOCAL8 4 Africa as (a) Linguistic Area(s) • Greenberg’s (1959) work on “Africa as a Linguistic Area” • Later work in Welmers (1973), Heine (1976), Gregersen (1977), Houis (1980), and Greenberg (1983) • Nasality has been used to define certain linguistic areas within Africa – Large-scale areas of convergence which cut across genetic families Rolle – WOCAL8 5 Güldemann 2008, 2010 • West African Area – “Macro Sudan Belt” Rolle – WOCAL8 6 Areal Features • (Macro) Sudan Belt Areal Zone - Clements & Rialland (2006), Güldemann (2008, 2010) – Serial verb constructions – Implosives – Labial-velar stops – More than two tone heights – ATR Harmony – Nasal Vowels – ...Among others • Certain tense/aspect systems (e.g. such as factative/performative marking) Rolle – WOCAL8 7 Areal Features – Gaps! • However, it is clear that there any numerous languages which exist within these areas which systematically do not display these areal properties – Languages without ATR (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Contact, Areality, and History: the Songhay Question Revisited 1
    Language Contact, Areality, and History: the 1 Songhay Question Revisited Robert Nicolaï Institut Universitaire de France - Université de Nice 1. Historical background The proposal that Songhay be included in Nilo-Saharan (Greenberg 1963, see appendix 1 below) was questioned by Lacroix (1969) and debated by Nicolaï (1990). Large-scale studies of the internal subclassification of Nilo-Saharan (NS) conducted by Bender (1995) and Ehret (2001) nevertheless supported it. Both the latter scholars base their work on the genealogical tree model and share (in particular Ehret) the same assumption of the existence of a NS language family. Like Greenberg before them, they include the Songhay group of languages in the NS family, although each places it differently on his own genealogical tree. Their working methods are also different: Bender uses mass comparison and isoglosses while Ehret uses correspondence-based reconstruction. One might therefore assume that the question has been definitively settled, since major work by two independent scholars confirms the inclusion of Songhay in the NS family/phylum, even though subclassification varies. This is not however the case. The latest study (Nicolaï 2003) provides a detailed evaluation of the empirical proof adduced in support of the classification of Songhay as NS, and finds both Ehret's and Bender's results wanting. The analysis proceeds in three stages. • Impugning the NS hypothesis : it can be shown that the data and reasoning on which the classification of Songhay as NS is based do not withstand critical examination and must be rejected in view of their unconvincing empirical validity and their theoretical insufficiency. • Unexpected developments in lexical research involving the Afroasiatic languages : a Berber-Semitic origin can be postulated for a large number of terms invoked by both Bender and Ehret as proof of NS filiation and for many others as well.
    [Show full text]
  • A Grammar of Agolle Kusaal Revised Version
    A Grammar of Agolle Kusaal Revised Version David Eddyshaw i Contents Preface...................................................................................................................... ix Preface to the Revised Version..................................................................................xi Introduction to the Grammar...................................................................................xii Other Studies of Kusaal...........................................................................................xiv Abbreviations.......................................................................................................... xvi Interlinear Glossing................................................................................................xvii Transcription Conventions......................................................................................xix Sources..................................................................................................................... xx References/Bibliography.........................................................................................xxi 1 Introduction to Kusaal and the Kusaasi.....................................................................1 1.1 The Kusaasi People.............................................................................................2 1.2 The Kusaal Language..........................................................................................4 1.2.1 Language Status..........................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Nasal Vowel Patterns in West Africa” 1 [email protected]
    UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report (2013) Nicholas Rolle UC Berkeley 1 “Nasal vowel patterns in West Africa” [email protected] 1. INTRODUCTION Nasal vowels are a common feature of West African phonologies, and have received a significant amount of attention concerning their (suprasegmental) representation, their interaction with nasal consonants, and their phonetic realization. Numerous authors have presented surveys of varying degrees of (targeted) depth which address the distribution of contrastive nasal vowels in (West) Africa, including Hyman (1972), Williamson (1973), Ruhlen (1978), Maddieson (1984, 2007), Clements (2000), Clements & Rialland (2006), and Hajek (2011). Building on this literature, this present study provides a more extensive survey on contrastive nasal vowels in West Africa, and specifically studies the types of systematic gaps found. For example, the language Togo-Remnant language Bowili has a 7 oral vowel inventory canonical of West Africa /i e ɛ a ɔ o u/, as well as a full set of nasal counterparts /ĩ ẽ ɛ ̃ ã ɔ̃ õ ũ/ (Williamson 1973). In contrast, the Gur language Bariba has the same 7 oral vowel inventory, though a more limited nasal set /ĩ ɛ ̃ ã ɔ̃ ũ/, missing mid-high vowels */ẽ õ/ (Hyman 1972:201). Using this as a starting point, this paper addresses the following questions: . What are the recurring patterns one finds in West African nasal vowel systems and inventories? o What restrictions are there on mid vowels in the nasal inventory? . In which families/areal zones do we find these patterns? . To which factors can we attribute these patterns? o Genetic – Vertical inheritance o Areal – Horizontal spread o Universal Phonetic – Parallel Developments .
    [Show full text]