DOCSLIB.ORG

A Sumerian and an Elamite Fragment of Cuneiform Royal Inscriptions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Sumerian and an Elamite Fragment of Cuneiform Royal Inscriptions ARCHEOLOGIE MOCI TÉMA A Sumerian and an Elamite Fragment of Cuneiform Royal Inscriptions This contribution offers an Col. i Col. ii edition of two fragments of royal building inscriptions in 1 cuneiform script which are 1 currently in possession of individuals from the region of Hradec Králové in Czechia. Fragment No. 1 comes from late 3rd millennium BC southern Iraq and preserves part of an inscription in Sumerian, fragment No. 2 stems from late 2nd millennium BC south- western Iran and bears part of 5 a text in the Elamite language. 4 n Luděk VACÍN No. 1: An Inscription of Gudea n Fig. 3 An inscription of Gudea. Hand-copy of the entire inscription (Luckenbill 1930, No. 33) with the signs preserved in the new fragment marked in red. The first fragment (fig. 1–2) con- tains a few signs from the inscripti- on of the famous Lagaš II ruler Gu- Gudea 48; Edzard 1997, 135–136, (modern Telloh), the centre of the dea (ca. 2141–2122 BC; Falkenstein E3/1.1.7.37). city-state of Lagaš, is a more likely 1957–1971; for the entire inscripti- candidate than the ancient town of on see fig. 3). The shape and pla- The shape (flat surface) and materi- Lagaš proper (modern al-Hibah). cement of the signs leave no doubt al (clay) of the fragment betray that the original carrier of the text was that they once belonged to the Transliteration standard inscription commemora- a brick, a frequently attested speci- ting Gudea’s wholesale restoration men, perhaps stamped with a mi- Col. i of the Eninnu (literally “House-Fif- rror matrix of the inscription. So- 1. [dni]n- ĝír -su ty”), the major temple in Ĝirsu, the meone wrote the letters LA in blue 2. [ur-sa]⌈ĝ kala-ga⌉ residential city of Gudea’s city-sta- ink on the back side of the frag- 3. [den-líl-lá-ra] te, which was consecrated to the ment. Those may stand for “Lagaš” 4. [gù-dé-a] chief deity of the state pantheon, but should this be taken as an indi- 5. [ensi2] ki Ninĝirsu (Steible 1991, 304–311, cation of provenance, ancient Ĝirsu 6. [lagaš -ke4] n Fig. 1 An inscription of Gudea. Photo of the fragment No. 1. n Fig. 2 An inscription of Gudea. Hand-copy of the fragment No. 1. ŽIVÁ ARCHEOLOGIE – REA 19/2017 22 TÉMA ARCHEOLOGIE MOCI Col. ii 1. ní[ĝ-du7-e pa mu-na-è] d mušen 2. [é-ninnu- anzu2 -babbar2-ra-ni] 3. [mu-na-dù] 4. [ki-bé mu-na-gi4] Translation i 1–6) [For (the god) Ni]nĝirsu, the mighty [warr]ior [of (the god) En- lil, Gudea, prince of Lagaš, ii 1–4) made appropriate] thin[gs appear (again); (i.e.) he built and res- tored for him his (temple) Eninnu – “The White Lion-Headed Eagle”]. No. 2: An Inscription of Šutruk-Naḫḫunte I The second fragment (fig. 4–5) be- longs to the corpus of commemo- rative inscriptions commissioned n Fig. 4 An inscription of Šutruk-Naḫḫunte I. Photograph of the fragment No. 2. by the Elamite king Šutruk-Na- ḫḫunte I (ca. 1190–1155 BC; for the entire inscription see fig. 6). Ha- ving been the founder of a power- ful Middle Elamite ruling house, this king left his mark on ancient Near Eastern history particular- ly by his and his son’s campaings in Babylonia during which they pillaged several cities and brou- ght to Elam significant monu- ments, including the Victory Stele of Narām-Su’en and the basalt ste- le with the Ḫammurāpi Law Code (Carter – Stolper 1984, 39–41). Tho- se were discovered in the ruins of the Elamite capital city of Susa by the French expedition at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries and are currently among the highlights of the Louvre collection of Orien- tal antiquities. n Fig. 5 An inscription of Šutruk-Naḫḫunte I. Hand-copy of the fragment No. 2. Yet, Šutruk-Naḫḫunte was not only a plunderer of foreign cities but may have fallen off during that pro- Transliteration also a builder of religious structu- cedure and was subsequently glued res in his kingdom, particularly back in place. 1. [ú mšu-ut-ru-uk-dnaḫ-ḫu-un-te ša]-ak the temple precinct of Inšušinak, ḫal-lu- du -u[š-din-šu-ši-na-ak- / the tutelary deity of the capital. A There is a sticker on the back of the 2. kí-ik⌈ su-un-ki-ik⌉ an-za-an number of bricks bearing Šutruk- fragment with handwritten Czech šu-šu]- un -ka4 e-ri-e[n-tu4-um -Naḫḫunte’s standard building in- description of the origin and da- ti-pu-u⌈ḫ] ⌉ scription were excavated in the ting of the piece: “Ziggurat Chogha 3. [a-ak ḫi-ia-an din-šu-ši-na-a]k area, mostly in the hypostyle hall Zanbil, Khuzestan province, sou- na -pír- ú -ri-[me a-ḫa-an (König 1977, 13, 71–72, No. 18; Mal- thern Iran, ca. 1250 BC, the Elami- ḫ⌈ a-li-i⌉ ḫ-ma⌈ ⌉ḫu- / bran-Labat 1995, 79–81). te period.” This location and date 4. tak ḫa-li-ku-me din-šu-ši-na-ak] would point to an inscription of na-pír-ú -ri i[n li-na te-la-ak-ni] The fragment edited below once king Untaš-Napiriša (Carter – Stol- ⌈ ⌉ belonged to one of them. The pie- per 1984, 37–39), yet the text proves Translation ce is quite thin now, resembling a otherwise. It is undoubtedly a rem- tablet of clay with admixtures, but nant of Šutruk-Naḫḫunte’s buil- 1. [I, Šutruk-Naḫḫunte, so]n its perfectly flat back side makes it ding inscription attested only at of Ḫalludu[š-Inšušinak, clear that it was cut off from a bro- Susa (König 1977, 13, 71–72, No. 18; 2. King of Anšan and Sus]a, ken brick. The upper right corner Malbran-Labat 1995, 79–81). [shaped] baked bri[cks, 19/2017 ŽIVÁ ARCHEOLOGIE – REA 23 ARCHEOLOGIE MOCI TÉMA n Fig. 6 An inscription of Šutruk-Naḫḫunte I. Hand-copy of an exemplar of the five-line version of the entire inscription (König – Bork – Hü- sing 1925, No. 18; for a photograph see Scheil 1901, Pl. VII, 1) with the signs preserved in the new fragment marked in red. 3. and here I set about creating a edited. Note that this inscription is Kozuh, M. 2014: Elamite and Akkadian hypostyle hall of Inšušinak], my in most cases written over five lines Inscribed Bricks from Bard-e Karegar god. (König 1977, 13, No. 18: „Fünfzeilige (Khuzistan, Iran). In: M. Kozuh – W. F. M. Henkelman – C. E. Jones – C. Woods (eds.), 4. W[hat I have done and accomp- Backsteine aus Susa mit variieren- Extraction & Control: Studies in Honor lished shall be presented as a gift to der Zeileneinteilung.“). The transla- of Matthew W. Stolper. Studies in Ancient Inšušinak], my god! tion of this line follows Hinz – Koch Oriental Civilization 68. Chicago, 131–161. 1987, 598, s.v. ha-li-h, ha-li-h-ma. König, F. W. – Bork, F. – Hüsing, G. 1925: Corpus inscriptionum Elamicarum I. Die Malbran-Labat 1995, 79 translates Notes altelamischen Texte: Tafeln. Hannover. «et ainsi j’ai édifié la salle hypostyle König, F. W. 1977: Die elamischen 1. The AG sign has two pairs of ho- d’Inshushinak, mon dieu». Königsinschriften. Archiv für rizontals in its middle part (cf. Ste- Orientforschung Beiheft 16. Osnabrück. Luckenbill, D. D. 1930 ve 1992, 58–59, No. 97). The writing 4. Difficulties with the distributi- : Inscriptions from Adab. Oriental Institute Publications 14. of Ḫalluduš-Inšušinak’s name wit- on of text can clearly be observed Chicago. hout the determinative of person in this line. The signs PÍR, Ú and Malbran-Labat, F. 1995: Les inscriptions does occur in other brick inscripti- RI follow very closely after one ano- royales de Suse. Briques de l’époque paléo- ons of his successor (König 1977, 77, ther with no empty space between élamite à l’Empire néo-élamite. Paris. Scheil, V. 1901: Textes Élamites-Anzanites: No. 23; cf. Kozuh 2014, 138, Type 5) them. The RI sign is smaller than Tome III. Mémoires de la Délégation en but it is rare and apparently not yet in the previous lines. Only traces of Perse 3. Paris. attested for this inscription. There the uppermost horizontal and the Steible, H. 1991: Die neusumerischen Bau- seems to have been an upright st- final vertical of the Ú sign are visi- und Weihinschriften: Teil 1. Inschriften roke in the damaged DU sign (cf. ble and this sign was clearly quite der II. Dynastie von Lagaš. Freiburger altorientalische Studien 9/1. Stuttgart. Steve 1992, 82–83, No. 206). squeezed, as is the whole sequence Steve, M.-J. 1992: Syllabaire élamite: histoire et na-pír-ú-ri compared to the same in paléographie. Civilisations du Proche-Orient 2. The shape of the QA sign is much line 3. The translation of the con- II: Philologie 1. Neuchâtel – Paris. closer to the occurrences of this struction *ḫutak ḫalik-u-me follows sign in the inscriptions of Šutruk- Hinz – Koch 1987, 599, s.v. ha-li- Souhrn -Naḫḫunte’s grandson Ḫuteluduš- -ik.ú-me, the translation of *in lina -Inšušinak (Steve 1992, 51, No. 62). telakni is based on Hinz – Koch 1987, Příspěvek přináší filologické zpracování dvou zlomků klínopisných stavebních nápisů. Prv- 316, s.v. te-la-ak-ni, cf. 729, 831, s.v. ní z nich pochází z jižní Mezopotámie konce 3. There is an upright stroke at hu-ut-ta-ak, li-na.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bismya; Or the Lost City of Adab : a Story of Adventure, of Exploration
    The Lost City of Adab 1 ' i %|,| / ";'M^"|('1j*)'| | Edgar James Banks l (Stanttll Wttfrmttg |fitag BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME FROM THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND THE GIFT OF Hcm-ij W. Sage 1891 fjjRmf... Lifoi/jL 3777 Cornell University Library DS 70.S.B5B21 Bismya: or The lost city of Adab 3 1924 028 551 913 Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924028551913 The Author as an Arab. Bismya or The Lost City of Adab A Story of Adventure, of Exploration, and of Excavation among the Ruins of the Oldest of the Buried Cities of Babylonia By Edgar James Banks, Ph.D. Field Director of the Expedition of the Oriental Exploration Fund of the University of Chicago to Babylonia With 174 Illustrations G. P. Putnam's Sons New York and London Gbe IRnfcfeerbocfter press 1912 t.v. Copyright, 1912 BY EDGAR JAMES BANKS Ube TKniefeerbocftei: ipresg, mew ffiorft The University of Chicago office of the president Chicago, June 12, 1912. On the recommendation of the Director of the Baby- lonian Section of the Oriental Exploration Fund of the University of Chicago, permission has been granted to Dr. Edgar J. Banks, Field Director of the Fund at Bismya, to publish this account of his work in Mesopotamia. Dr. Banks was granted full authority in the field. He is entitled therefore to the credit for successes therein, as of course he will receive whatever criticism scholars may see fit to make.
    [Show full text]
  • SUMERIAN LITERATURE and SUMERIAN IDENTITY My Title Puts
    CNI Publicati ons 43 SUMERIAN LITERATURE AND SUMERIAN IDENTITY JERROLD S. COOPER PROBLEMS OF C..\NONlCl'TY AND IDENTITY FORMATION IN A NCIENT EGYPT AND MESOPOTAMIA There is evidence of a regional identity in early Babylonia, but it does not seem to be of the Sumerian ethno-lingusitic sort. Sumerian Edited by identity as such appears only as an artifact of the scribal literary KIM RYHOLT curriculum once the Sumerian language had to be acquired through GOJKO B AR .I AMOVIC educati on rather than as a mother tongue. By the late second millennium, it appears there was no notion that a separate Sumerian ethno-lingui stic population had ever existed. My title puts Sumerian literature before Sumerian identity, and in so doing anticipates my conclusion, which will be that there was little or no Sumerian identity as such - in the sense of "We are all Sumerians!" ­ outside of Sumerian literature and the scribal milieu that composed and transmitted it. By "Sumerian literature," I mean the corpus of compositions in Sumerian known from manuscripts that date primarily 1 to the first half of the 18 h century BC. With a few notable exceptions, the compositions themselves originated in the preceding three centuries, that is, in what Assyriologists call the Ur III and Isin-Larsa (or Early Old Babylonian) periods. I purposely eschew the too fraught and contested term "canon," preferring the very neutral "corpus" instead, while recognizing that because nearly all of our manuscripts were produced by students, the term "curriculum" is apt as well. 1 The geographic designation "Babylonia" is used here for the region to the south of present day Baghdad, the territory the ancients would have called "Sumer and Akkad." I will argue that there is indeed evidence for a 3rd millennium pan-Babylonian regional identity, but little or no evidence that it was bound to a Sumerian mother-tongue community.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Maiocchi, M. Classical Sargonic Tablets Chiefly from Adab in the Cornell University Collections (CUSAS 13)
    A review of Maiocchi, M. Classical Sargonic Tablets Chiefly from Adab in the Cornell University Collections (CUSAS 13). Bethesda: CDL Press, 2009 (337 pp. + xxxviii pl.), with notes on Maiocchi, M.; Visicato, G. Classical Sargo- nic Tablets hiefly from Adab in the Cornell University Collections. Part II (CUSAS 19). Bethesda: CDL Press, 2012 (208 pp.).1 The Cornell University houses one of the most important collections of the Sargonic texts in the United States.2 This corpus is being published in the Cornell University Studies in Assyriology and Sumerology (CUSAS) series; by now five CUSAS volumes with Sargonic material have come out of press.3 This is the (admittedly delayed) review of CUSAS 13 (Maiocchi 2009)4 and CUSAS 19 (Maiocchi–Visicato 2012). These volumes are treated here together because most of the texts in them share the same provenance and dating. In total the books under review provide the edition of 432 cunei- form tablets mostly of Adab origin,5 with some minor groups attributed to other cities6 such as Umma, Umm-al-Hafriyat, Isin, Ešnuna and Girsu. 1 This article was prepared with the financial support from the Russian Foun- dation for the Humanities (project No.14-21-17004). The author wishes to ex- press her gratitude to this institution. 2 Detailed information on the tablet collections in the Jonathan and Jeannette Rosen Ancient Near Eastern Studies Seminar, Cornell University in Ithaca, N.Y. and their publication in the CUSAS series can be found at http://cuneiform.library.cornell.edu/collections. 3 These are Maiocchi 2009 (CUSAS 13), Visicato–Westenholz 2010 (CUSAS 11), Maiocchi–Visicato 2012 (CUSAS 19), Bartash 2013 (CUSAS 23) and Westenholz 2014 (CUSAS 26).
    [Show full text]
  • Gilgamesh Sung in Ancient Sumerian Gilgamesh and the Ancient Near East
    Gilgamesh sung in ancient Sumerian Gilgamesh and the Ancient Near East Dr. Le4cia R. Rodriguez 20.09.2017 ì The Ancient Near East Cuneiform cuneus = wedge Anadolu Medeniyetleri Müzesi, Ankara Babylonian deed of sale. ca. 1750 BCE. Tablet of Sargon of Akkad, Assyrian Tablet with love poem, Sumerian, 2037-2029 BCE 19th-18th centuries BCE *Gilgamesh was an historic figure, King of Uruk, in Sumeria, ca. 2800/2700 BCE (?), and great builder of temples and ci4es. *Stories about Gilgamesh, oral poems, were eventually wriXen down. *The Babylonian epic of Gilgamesh compiled from 73 tablets in various languages. *Tablets discovered in the mid-19th century and con4nue to be translated. Hero overpowering a lion, relief from the citadel of Sargon II, Dur Sharrukin (modern Khorsabad), Iraq, ca. 721–705 BCE The Flood Tablet, 11th tablet of the Epic of Gilgamesh, Library of Ashurbanipal Neo-Assyrian, 7th century BCE, The Bri4sh Museum American Dad Gilgamesh and Enkidu flank the fleeing Humbaba, cylinder seal Neo-Assyrian ca. 8th century BCE, 2.8cm x 1.3cm, The Bri4sh Museum DOUBLING/TWINS BROMANCE *Role of divinity in everyday life. *Relaonship between divine and ruler. *Ruler’s asser4on of dominance and quest for ‘immortality’. StatuePes of two worshipers from Abu Temple at Eshnunna (modern Tell Asmar), Iraq, ca. 2700 BCE. Gypsum inlaid with shell and black limestone, male figure 2’ 6” high. Iraq Museum, Baghdad. URUK (WARKA) Remains of the White Temple on its ziggurat. Uruk (Warka), Iraq, ca. 3500–3000 BCE. Plan and ReconstrucVon drawing of the White Temple and ziggurat, Uruk (Warka), Iraq, ca.
    [Show full text]
  • NINAZU, the PERSONAL DEITY of GUDEA Toshiko KOBAYASHI*
    NINAZU, THE PERSONAL DEITY OF GUDEA -The Continuity of Personal Deity of Rulers on the Royal Inscriptions of Lagash- Toshiko KOBAYASHI* I. Introduction 1. Historical materials from later periods For many years, I have examined the personal deities of rulers in Pre- Sargonic Lagash.(1) There are not many historical materials about the personal deities from Pre-Sargonic times. In as much as the materials are limited chiefly to the personal deities recorded in the royal inscriptions, not all aspects of personal deities are clear. In my paper "On Ninazu, as Seen in the Economic Texts of the Early Dynastic Lagas (1)" in Orient XXVIII, I discussed Ninazu, who appears in the administrative-economic texts of Pre-Sargonic Lagash. Ninazu appears only in the offering-lists in the reign of Uruinimgina, the last ruler of Pre-Sargonic Lagash. Based only on an analysis of the offering-lists, I argued that Ninazu was the personal deity of a close relative of Uruinimgina. In my investigation thus far of the extant historical materials from Pre-Sargonic Lagash, I have not found any royal inscriptions and administrative-economic texts that refer to Ninazu as dingir-ra-ni ("his deity"), that is, as his personal deity. However, in later historical materials two texts refer to Ninazu as "his deity."(2) One of the texts is FLP 2641,(3) a royal inscription by Gudea, engraved on a clay cone. The text states, "For his deity Ninazu, Gudea, ensi of Lagash, built his temple in Girsu." Gudea is one of the rulers belonging to prosperous Lagash in the Pre-Ur III period; that is, when the Akkad dynasty was in decline, after having been raided by Gutium.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 a Typology of Sumerian Copular Clauses36
    3 A Typology of Sumerian Copular Clauses36 3.1 Introduction CCs may be classified according to a number of characteristics. Jagersma (2010, pp. 687-705) gives a detailed description of Sumerian CCs arranged according to the types of constituents that may function as S or PC. Jagersma’s description is the most detailed one ever written about CCs in Sumerian, and particularly, the parts on clauses with a non-finite verbal form as the PC are extremely insightful. Linguistic studies on CCs, however, discuss the kind of constituents in CCs only in connection with another kind of classification which appears to be more relevant to the description of CCs. This classification is based on the semantic properties of CCs, which in turn have a profound influence on their grammatical and pragmatic properties. In this chapter I will give a description of CCs based mainly on the work of Renaat Declerck (1988) (which itself owes much to Higgins [1979]), and Mikkelsen (2005). My description will also take into account the information structure of CCs. Information structure is understood as “a phenomenon of information packaging that responds to the immediate communicative needs of interlocutors” (Krifka, 2007, p. 13). CCs appear to be ideal for studying the role information packaging plays in Sumerian grammar. Their morphology and structure are much simpler than the morphology and structure of clauses with a non-copular finite verb, and there is a more transparent connection between their pragmatic characteristics and their structure. 3.2 The Classification of Copular Clauses in Linguistics CCs can be divided into three main types on the basis of their meaning: predicational, specificational, and equative.
    [Show full text]
  • Forgetting the Sumerians in Ancient Iraq Jerrold Cooper Johns Hopkins University
    “I have forgotten my burden of former days!” Forgetting the Sumerians in Ancient Iraq Jerrold Cooper Johns Hopkins University The honor and occasion of an American Oriental Society presidential address cannot but evoke memories. The annual AOS meeting is, after all, the site of many of our earliest schol- arly memories, and more recent ones as well. The memory of my immediate predecessor’s address, a very hard act to follow indeed, remains vivid. Sid Griffiths gave a lucid account of a controversial topic with appeal to a broad audience. His delivery was beautifully attuned to the occasion, and his talk was perfectly timed. At the very first AOS presidential address I attended, the speaker was a bit tipsy, and, ten minutes into his talk, he looked at his watch and said, “Oh, I’ve gone on too long!” and sat down. I also remember a quite different presi- dential address in which, after an hour had passed, the speaker declared, “I know I’ve been talking for a long time, but since this is the first and only time most of you will hear anything about my field, I’ll continue on until you’ve heard all I think you ought to know!” It is but a small move from individual memory to cultural memory, a move I would like to make with a slight twist. As my title announces, the subject of this communication will not be how the ancient Mesopotamians remembered their past, but rather how they managed to forget, or seemed to forget, an important component of their early history.
    [Show full text]
  • 003 Transcript
    Episode 003 Sargon to Hammurabi: Trade and Turmoil in Ancient Mesopotamia Today we’re going to cover a larger span of time than we have covered in a single podcast to this point, so buckle in as we look at some details about a certain Sumerian moon-god and how his mythical journey can give us a little insight into the boat building materials of pre-Akkadian Sumer. Then, we’ll see how Sargon forged one of the first true empires and we’ll look at some records from Akkad that give us insight into the range and scope of Akkadian trade. We’ll get an overview of the gradual changes in trade that occurred in Mesopotamia and we’ll end up at a point that is essentially the end of ancient Mesopotamia’s connection to maritime history, a point that is near the appearance of the Hittites, the end of the Bronze age in Mesopotamia, and a sharp decline in Persian Gulf trade. Let’s start by looking at a few religious texts from ancient Sumer that can shed some light on the materials used to build magur boats and just how important these boats were in Sumer. A small caveat though first: it’s thought that the sacred boats differed from the everyday boat used by the common person, so the magur boats we’re talking about may have been only a small portion of the boats used in Mesopotamia, or they may simply have been idealized depictions of boats that were beautiful enough for the gods to have used.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lagash-Umma Border Conflict 9
    CHAPTER I Introduction: Early Civilization and Political Organization in Babylonia' The earliest large urban agglomoration in Mesopotamia was the city known as Uruk in later texts. There, around 3000 B.C., certain distinctive features of historic Mesopotamian civilization emerged: the cylinder seal, a system of writing that soon became cuneiform, a repertoire of religious symbolism, and various artistic and architectural motifs and conven- tions.' Another feature of Mesopotamian civilization in the early historic periods, the con- stellation of more or less independent city-states resistant to the establishment of a strong central political force, was probably characteristic of this proto-historic period as well. Uruk, by virtue of its size, must have played a dominant role in southern Babylonia, and the city of Kish probably played a similar role in the north. From the period that archaeologists call Early Dynastic I1 (ED 11), beginning about 2700 B.c.,~the appearance of walls around Babylonian cities suggests that inter-city warfare had become institutionalized. The earliest royal inscriptions, which date to this period, belong to kings of Kish, a northern Babylonian city, but were found in the Diyala region, at Nippur, at Adab and at Girsu. Those at Adab and Girsu are from the later part of ED I1 and are in the name of Mesalim, king of Kish, accompanied by the names of the respective local ruler^.^ The king of Kish thus exercised hegemony far beyond the walls of his own city, and the memory of this particular king survived in native historical traditions for centuries: the Lagash-Umma border was represented in the inscriptions from Lagash as having been determined by the god Enlil, but actually drawn by Mesalim, king of Kish (IV.1).
    [Show full text]
  • Configuring the Roots of Zahak Myth According to the Elamites' Cylinder
    Vol.14/ No.56/ Feb 2018 Received 2017/07/07 Accepted 2017/12/16 Persian translation of this paper entitled: بن مایه های کهن اسطوره ضحاک در ایران براساس نقوش روی مهر دوره عیﻻمی)هزاره سوم قبل از میﻻد( is also published in this issue of journal. Configuring the Roots of Zahak Myth according to the Elamites’ Cylinder Seals (3rd Millennium B.C.) Bita Mesbah* Abstract What is different about Iranian art is the use of hybrid motifs which is a characteristic of the Iranian art. The hybrid forms show the impact of the mythological beliefs. These beliefs also have changed a lot so it is hard to recognize the exact meaning of these motifs. Shahnama is the source of great myths in Iran and is the main source for tracing myths between the Islamic periods and the mythological beliefs before Islam. This research is based on studying the snake-man which is known as Zahak in Shahnama. The research focuses on three cylinder seals (the impressions found) which show the snake-man. These cylinder seals were found in Susa, Tepe Yahya and Tepe Shahdad. All three date back to the third millennium B.C. The snake- man which has two snake or dragons on the shoulders was well-known in Iran and Mesopotamia. The god of the dead is basically showed by this motif in Mesopotamia. Especially, Ningišzida is a Mesopotamian deity of the underworld. His name in Sumerian is translated as “the lord of the good tree”. The city of Lagash had a temple dedicated to Ningišzida, and Gudea, patesi of Lagash in the 21st century BC, was one of his devotees.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Sumerians
    Ancient Sumerians Reviving a civilization from the past Megan Frisella, Joy Lim, Sriya Pidatala, Tony Vuolo Who were the Sumerians? ➔ A civilization that populated land in southern Mesopotamia (modern day Iraq and Kuwait) ➔ The Sumerians are known for the first cities and innovation in writing, governance, and technology. ➔ Sumer existed from around 4000 BCE to 2000 BCE. Origin of the Sumerians ➔ 4500-4000 BCE (in Mesopotamia) ◆ Ubaid people - civilization built around farming communities ➔ 3000 BCE - Sumerians took over the region and controlled it until 2000 BCE Sumerian City-States ➔ Sumerian city-states were walled in communities surrounded by agricultural villages ➔ Governed by a king/priest who serves as a political and religious leader ◆ Each city is dedicated to a Sumerian deity who is worshiped by the city’s inhabitants ➔ The first cities in the world were in the Sumerian civilization ◆ Uruk : The first city in the world and the capital of the Sumerian empire Government ➔ Government could levy taxes; allowed them to have public works like large canals and monuments ➔ A record of kings was found inscribed on a tablet ➔ Lugalzagesi was the last ruler before Sumer came under the control of another nation ➔ Captured by the Akkadians Language ➔ One of the first writing systems was cuneiform ◆ Cuneiform uses pictographs, written with a reed stylus on a wet clay tile ➔ Employed scribes to keep records in government or religious settings ◆ Stamps with symbols that indicate what is being traded ◆ Detailed trade reports (for taxes, etc.) Social Structure 1. King/Priest 2. Subordinate Priests (religious leaders and healers) 3. Upper Class (self-employed, high in the military, scribes) 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Craftsmen in the Neo-Assyrian Empire
    $OWHU2ULHQWXQG$OWHV7HVWDPHQW %DQG :KDW¶VLQD1DPH" 7HUPLQRORJ\UHODWHGWRWKH:RUN)RUFH DQG-RE&DWHJRULHVLQWKH$QFLHQW1HDU(DVW (GLWHGE\ $JQqV*DUFLD9HQWXUD $ 2 $ 7 ±±±±± QD1DPH" 9HQWXUD:KDW¶VL *DUFLD $JQqV*DUFLD9HQWXUD :KDW¶VLQD1DPH" 7HUPLQRORJ\UHODWHGWRWKH:RUN)RUFH DQG-RE&DWHJRULHVLQWKH$QFLHQW1HDU(DVW $OWHU2ULHQWXQG$OWHV7HVWDPHQW 9HU|IIHQWOLFKXQJHQ]XU.XOWXUXQG*HVFKLFKWHGHV$OWHQ2ULHQWV XQGGHV$OWHQ7HVWDPHQWV %DQG +HUDXVJHEHU 0DQIULHG'LHWULFK,QJR.RWWVLHSHU+DQV1HXPDQQ %HUDWHUJUHPLXP 5DLQHU$OEHUW]-RDFKLP%UHWVFKQHLGHU6WHIDQ0DXO 8GR5WHUVZ|UGHQ:DOWKHU6DOODEHUJHU*HEKDUG6HO] 0LFKDHO36WUHFN :KDW¶VLQD1DPH" 7HUPLQRORJ\UHODWHGWRWKH:RUN)RUFH DQG-RE&DWHJRULHVLQWKH$QFLHQW1HDU(DVW $JQqV*DUFLD9HQWXUD 8JDULW9HUODJ 0QVWHU 7KRURXJKO\UHIHUHHG $JQqV*DUFLD9HQWXUD :KDW¶VLQD1DPH"±7HUPLQRORJ\UHODWHGWRWKH:RUN)RUFH DQG-RE&DWHJRULHVLQWKH$QFLHQW1HDU(DVW $OWHU2ULHQWXQG$OWHV7HVWDPHQW 8JDULW9HUODJ±%XFKXQG0HGLHQKDQGHO0QVWHU ZZZXJDULWYHUODJFRP $OOULJKWVUHVHUYHG1RSDUWRIWKLVSXEOLFDWLRQPD\EHUHSURGXFHGVWRUHG LQDUHWULHYDOV\VWHPRUWUDQVPLWWHGLQDQ\IRUPRUE\DQ\PHDQV HOHFWURQLFPHFKDQLFDOSKRWRFRS\LQJUHFRUGLQJRURWKHUZLVH ZLWKRXWWKHSULRUSHUPLVVLRQRIWKHSXEOLVKHU 3ULQWHGLQ*HUPDQ\ ,6%1 ,661 3ULQWHGRQDFLGIUHHSDSHU Table of Contents Acknowledgements .............................................................................................. 7 Agnès Garcia-Ventura Introduction: The Work Force and Job Categories in the Ancient Near East ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]