DOCSLIB.ORG

HUNGARIAN FOREIGN POLICY at the TIME of the RISE to POWER and CONSOLIDA TION of the Translation Revised COUNTER-REVOLUTIONARY R£GIME, 1919- 1926 B, I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HUNGARIAN FOREIGN POLICY at the TIME of the RISE to POWER and CONSOLIDA TION of the Translation Revised COUNTER-REVOLUTIONARY R£GIME, 1919- 1926 B, I Revised Edition of the Hungarian Original: CONTENTS MAGYARORSzAG KOLPOLITlKAJA 1919-1945 KOSSUTH KONYVKIAOO. BUDAPEST 1975 Translated b, CHAPTER I Sandor Simon HUNGARIAN FOREIGN POLICY AT THE TIME OF THE RISE TO POWER AND CONSOLIDA TION OF THE Translation revised COUNTER-REVOLUTIONARY R£GIME, 1919- 1926 b, I. Antecedents . 7 Maria Kovacs 2. International circumstances at the time of the counter-revolutionary take-over 27 3. The peace treaty. Scheming and experimenting in foreign politics from the peace negotiations to admission to the League of Nations . .. 41 4. Foreign politics in the consolidation period ................ , , . .. 67 CHAPTER II CONSOLIDATION OF THE FOREIGN POLICY OF COUNTER-REVOLUTIONARY HUNGARY I. The 'active' foreign policy of the Be lhlen Government, 1926-1930 . .. 81 2. The effect of the world economic crisis on Hungary's international position and on her foreign policy . .. 93 CHAPTER 1lI THE BERLIN-ROME AXIS AND HUNGARY, 1933-1939 I. Hungarian foreign policy from 1933 to 1936 ... .... .... ... .... ' 107 2. The foreign policy of the Daranyi Government . .. ........ .... 125 3. The Munich Pact and the fi rst Vienna Award . 136 ISBN 9630518821 4. Hungary's participation in the complete dismembe rment of Czechoslovakia . 145 © A1cadtmiai Kiad6, Budapest 1979 Printed in Hunpr), 5 CHAPTER IV CHAPTER I HUNGARY'S FOREIGN POLICY IN TIlE FIRST STAGE HUNGARIAN FOREIGN POLICY AT THE TIME OF THE RISE OF THE SECOND WORLD WAR , 1939- 1941 TO POWER AND CONSOLIDATION OF THE COUNTER-REVOLUTIONARY R£GIME,1919-1926 I. The foreign policy of the Teleki Government at the outbreak of the Second World War . .. .. ....... ... .... .. ...... .. 157 2. The 'funny war' and Hungary .. .. ... .... .. .. .. .... - . 165 J. The second Vienna Award and its consequences . ..... •. .. 172 1. Antecedents 4. Hungary's participation in the aggression against Yugoslavia . , .. .. 177 5. Hungary's entry into the Second World War . .. .. ... .. 188 In AuguSI 191 9 the great attempt at a democratic and socialist transformation of 6. The functions of foreign policy in counter·revolutionary Hungary . The road Hungarian SOCiety en ded in failure. The intervention of the Entente Powers, the to war . .. .... ... .. .. .. .. ... , .... , . 190 superiority of the forces of interventi on, and the activity of domestic reaction, all acted to bring about the collapse of the Soviet government. The new trend of Hungarian foreign policy for the next 2S years of counter-revolutionary government CHAPTER V already began to take shape after the collapse. HUNGARIAN FOREIGN POLICY IN THE SECOND STAGE The foreign policy of a country is determined by both its social system and international relation s. These not being static, renders the examination of certain OF THE WORLD WAR antecedents necessary, which should also be complemented by a careful consideration 1. Hungary's more active partiCipation in the war against the Soviet Union. of how they were conceived by the different groups of the state-forming nation . Declaration of war on Hungary by Great Britain and the United States . ... 199 After the faIl of the Hungarian Republic of Councils, the political attitude of the 2. The KaJIay Government's foreign political ambitions and half-hearted at­ Hungarian ruling classes returning to power was indelibly marked by two staggering tempts to withdraw from the war .. .. .. ... ...... ... 208 experiences within barely a year: I. The revolutions of 1918/1919 which, during the 3. The German occupation of Hungary . ....... .. ... .. 284 spring of 1919, had culminated in the establishment of soviet power, in an attempt to 4. Horthy's attempt at defection. The 15th of October, 1944 . .. .. .. 299 achieve a radical, socialist transformation of Hungarian society. 2. The diSintegration 5. Formation of the Provisional Government at Debrecen. Signing of the armi­ o('historical' Hungary as a result of the collapse of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy. stice .. ..... .. .. ... ... ..... .. .... ... .. .. 330 After four years of the world wa r which ended with the defeat of the Central Powers , an entirely new intern ational situation had be en created. A revolutionary wave swept Sources and references . .... .... .. .... ... ... .. 339 all over Europe under the influence of the successful socialist revolution in Russia. The Index of names . 35 1 revolution and the di Sintegration, having t aken place simultaneously, shocked the Hungarian ruli ng classes as catastrophes that foll owed from one another, and were conceived, falsely - as it happens when political fear predominates - as events in causal relation. We may not be far from the truth if we say that public opinion in Hungary coincided with this view. When reviewing the foreign policy of the counter-revolutionary period, therefore, we can not omit to make a brie f survey of the preceding war years. Having been defeated in the war, the Monarchy collapsed and fell apart. The Allied Powers signed an armistice with Austria-Hungary in Padua on November 3,1918. The agreement provide d for the cessation of hostilities and the evacuation of the territories which troops of the Monarchy had occupied during the war. The line of demarcation was only drawn on the south-western front, the armistice line for Hungary was thus left to coincide with the his torical boundaries of the country (without Croatia). It was 6 7 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The History of the Slovak-Hungarian “Little War” and Its Interpretations in National Histories
    The History of the Slovak-Hungarian “Little War” and Its Interpretations in National Histories István Janek Before tackling the events of the “Little War”, let us take a brief outlook on the study of it in Hungarian and Slovak historical literature. A great number of Slovak histori- ans have written on this issue producing many articles and conference publications in Slovakia. Here I would like to highlight the most important ones from four his- OPEN ACCESS torians: Ladislav Deák, František Cséfalvay, Zoltán Katreba and Ján Petrik. A lot has been written on the air warfare between the two armies as well: Juraj Rejninec and Ján Petrik from Slovakia and Iván Pataky, László Rozsos together with Gyula Sárhidai and Csaba B. Stenge from Hungary must be mentioned.1 A thorough study of the dip- lomatic aspect has been done only by István Janek in Hungary.2 Ján Petrik has worked at the local history level and he also published a short but detailed monograph on the Hungarian bombing of Spiška Nová Ves.3 Cséfalvay and Katreba are military histori- ans who work for the Slovak Institution of Military History. They focus on the mili- tary events and publish in various Slovakian historical periodicals.4 Cséfalvay has also shown the political connections of military events.5 It is the merit of the works 1 J. RAJNINEC, Slovenské letectvo 1939/1944, Vol. 1, Bratislava 1997; I. PATAKY — L. ROZ- SOS — G. SÁRHIDAI, Légi háború Magyarország felett, Vol. 1, Budapest 1992; B. C. STENGE, A magyar légierő 1938–1945, in: Rubicon, Vol. 23, No.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX .A. Note on the Present Position of the Munich Agreement of 29 September 1938
    APPENDIX .A. Note on the Present Position of the Munich Agreement of 29 September 1938 THE Munich Agreement, concluded between Germany, the United Kingdom, France and Italy for the cession of the Sudeten German territory by Czecho­ slovakia, although officially dated 29 September 1938, was in reality signed in the small hours of the morning of 30 September. l To it was annexed a declaration by the British and French Governments guaranteeing the new boundaries of the Czechoslovak state against unprovoked aggression. Germany and Italy also agreed to give a similar guarantee to Czechoslovakia 'when the question of the Polish and Hungarian minorities in Czechoslovakia had been settled'. It was further declared that the problems of these minorities in Czechoslovakia, if not settled within three months by agreement between the respective Governments, 'shall form the subject of another meeting of the Heads of the Governments of the four Powers here present'. Because of its nature, the Munich Agreement was not subject to the usual forms of ratification, and no provision for such procedure was included in its text. Parliamentary approval was accorded to Mr Chamberlain and to M. Daladier, on 6 and 5 October respectively, by means of votes of confidence but by the time these had been given in the House of Commons and the Chamber of Deputies the terms of the Munich Agreement were already a fait accompli. On 2 November 1938 the German and Italian Foreign Ministers, Ribben­ trop and Ciano, handed down the First Vienna Award, which, without consultation with, or reference to, the British and French Governments, adjudicated the fate of the Polish and Hungarian minorities in Czechoslovakia, in violation of the annexe to the Munich Agreement.2 The structure set up by the Munich Agreement was destroyed on 15 March 1939 when Hitler proclaimed that 'Czechoslovakia has ceased to exist'.
    [Show full text]
  • Minority Politics of Hungary and Romania Between 1940 and 1944
    ACTA UNIV. SAPIENTIAE, EUROPEAN AND REGIONAL STUDIES, 16 (2019) 59–74 DOI: 10 .2478/auseur-2019-0012 Minority Politics of Hungary and Romania between 1940 and 1944. The System of Reciprocity and Its Consequences1 János Kristóf MURÁDIN PhD, Assistant Professor Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania (Cluj-Napoca, Romania) Faculty of Sciences and Arts e-mail: muradinjanos@sapientia .ro Abstract . The main objective of the paper is to highlight the changes in the situation of the Hungarian minority in Romania and the Romanian minority in Hungary living in the divided Transylvania from the Second Vienna Arbitration from 30 August 1940 to the end of WWII . The author analyses the Hungarian and Romanian governments’ attitude regarding the new borders and their intentions with the minorities remaining on their territories . The paper offers a synthesis of the system of reciprocity, which determined the relations between the two states on the minority issue until 1944. Finally, the negative influence of the politics of reciprocity is shown on the interethnic relations in Transylvania . Keywords: Transylvania, Second Vienna Arbitration, border, minorities, politics of reciprocity, refugees Introduction According to the Second Vienna Arbitration of 30 August 1940, the northern part of Transylvania, the Szeklerland, and the Máramaros (in Romanian: Maramureş, in German: Maramuresch) region, which had been awarded to Romania twenty years earlier, were returned to Hungary (L . Balogh 2002: 5) . According to the 1941 census, the population of a total of 43,104 km2 of land under Hungarian jurisdiction (Thrirring 1940: 663) was 2,557,260, of whom 53 .6% were Hungarian and 39 .9% were Romanian speakers .
    [Show full text]
  • Hungary at Crossroads: War, Peace, and Occupation Politics (1918-1946)
    HUNGARY AT CROSSROADS: WAR, PEACE, AND OCCUPATION POLITICS (1918-1946) The Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences of İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University by IŞIL TİPİOĞLU In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS İHSAN DOĞRAMACI BİLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA July 2019 ABSTRACT HUNGARY AT CROSSROADS: WAR, PEACE, AND OCCUPATION POLITICS (1918-1946) Tipioğlu, Işıl M.A., Department of International Relations Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Hakan Kırımlı July, 2019 This thesis traces the steps of the Hungarian foreign policy from 1918 to 1946, and analyzes the impact of revisionism after the Treaty of Trianon on Hungarian foreign policy decisions and calculations after the First World War. Placing the Hungarian revisionism at its center, this thesis shows the different situation Hungary had as a South European power as an ally of Germany throughout the Second World War and subsequently under the Soviet occupation. It also argues that it was the interlinked Hungarian foreign policy steps well before 1941, the official Hungarian participation in the war, which made Hungary a belligerent country. Also, based largely on the American archival documents, this study places Hungary into a retrospective framework of the immediate post-war era in Europe, where the strong adherence to Nazi Germany and the Hungarian revisionism shaped the future of the country. Key Words: European Politics, Hungary, Revisionism, the Second World War, Twentieth Century iii ÖZET YOL AYRIMINDA MACARİSTAN: SAVAŞ, BARIŞ VE İŞGAL POLİTİKALARI (1918-1946) Tipioğlu, Işıl Yüksek Lisans, Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü Tez Danışmanı: Doç. Dr. Hakan Kırımlı Temmuz, 2019 Bu tez, 1918’den 1946’ya kadar olan Macar dış politikası adımlarını takip ederek Trianon Antlaşması’ndan sonra ortaya çıkan Macar revizyonizminin, Macar dış politika kararlarında ve hesaplamalarındaki etkisini analiz etmektedir.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Military Mission to Romania, 1940-1941 by Richard L. Dinardo
    The German Military Mission to Romania, 1940–1941 By RICHARD L. Di NARDO hen one thinks of security assistance and the train- ing of foreign troops, W Adolf Hitler’s Germany is not a country that typically comes to mind. Yet there were two instances in World War II when Germany did indeed deploy troops to other countries that were in noncombat cir- cumstances. The countries in question were Finland and Romania, and the German mili- tary mission to Romania is the subject of this article. The activities of the German mission to Romania are discussed and analyzed, and some conclusions and hopefully a few take- aways are offered that could be relevant for military professionals today. Creation of the Mission The matter of how the German military mission to Romania came into being can be covered relatively quickly. In late June 1940, the Soviet Union demanded from Romania the cession of both Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina. The only advice Germany could give to the Romanian government was to agree to surrender the territory.1 Fearful of further Soviet encroachments, the Roma- nian government made a series of pleas to Germany including a personal appeal from Wikimedia Commons King Carol II to Hitler for German military assistance in the summer of 1940. Hitler, Finnish Volunteer Battalion of German Waffen-SS return home from front in 1943 however, was not yet willing to undertake such a step. Thus, all Romanian requests were rebuffed with Hitler telling Carol that Romania brought its own problems upon itself by its prior pro-Allied policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Theses of Doctoral (Phd) Dissertation József Szanyi M. Péter Pázmány
    Theses of Doctoral (PhD) Dissertation József Szanyi M. Transcarpathia’s reannexation to Hungary (1938-1939). Autonomy, occupation, military action. Péter Pázmány Catholic University Faculty of Humanities and Arts Doctorate School of Historical Science Workshop for Economic, Regional and Political History Consultant: Dr. József Botlik 2017 I. Antecedents of the research, problem posing As a result of the peace system introduced after World War 1, the Transcarpathian Region (Kárpátalja), which is in the centre of my study, was annexed from Hungary to the newly established Czechoslovakia. After the Prague suzerainty of nearly two decades, by the late 1930s the Czechoslovakian state started to fall apart, which allowed Transcarpathia to become part of Hungary again. This long and complicated process can be divided into two important stages: first the flatland territories mainly inhabited by Hungarians got under Hungarian suzerainty in November 1938, then the highland territories mainly inhabited by Ruthenes were annexed to Hungary in March 1939 and supplemented as a result of the Slovak-Hungarian border clashes in April 1939. This period under study has relatively extensive bibliography, primarily written in the Hungarian, Ukrainian, Czech and English languages. At the same time, most part of the special literature examines this period mainly from the view of the states interested in the territory in accordance with the authors’ nationality; therefore, it was a huge task to compare and apply them with a focus on Transcarpathia. The sources of the relevant countries regarding the questions studied in the dissertation are available in Budapest, Prague and Transcarpathia in several languages. Accordingly, in my paper certain persons, settlements and the Transcarpathian Region itself are sometimes referred to by different names and spelling, depending on the way of writing in the given source of literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungarian-Romanian Relations: Assessing Prospects for Cooperation and Conflict
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1994-12 Hungarian-Romanian relations: assessing prospects for cooperation and conflict Rodgers, Joel E. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/42858 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA f)FrfiC ELECTEt MAY 0 2 1995 F THESIS HUNGARIAN-ROMANIAN RELATIONS: ASSESSING PROSPECTS FOR COOPERATION AND CONFLICT By Joel E. Rodgers December 1994 Thesis Advisor: DavidS. Yost Approv.ed for public release; distribution is unlimited. 19950501 022 - ----------------------------------- Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704.0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, inducting the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, inducting suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washingon headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Sutte 1204, Ar1ington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704 0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave ,2.REPORT DATE ,3.REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED blank) December 1994 Master's Thesis 4.TITLE AND SUBTITLE HUNGARIAN-ROMANIAN RELATIONS: ASSESSING S.FUNDING NUMBERS PROSPECTS FOR COOPERATION AND CONFLICT 6.AUTHOR(S) Joel E. Rodgers ?.PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) &.PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey CA 93943-5000 9.SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 1 O.SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11.SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Hitler's Policy Towards the Soviet Union January 1933
    HITLER'S POLICY TOWARDS THE SOVIET UNION JANUARY 1933 - JUNE I94I by HARVEY LEONARD DYCK B.A., University of British Columbia, 195?< A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in International Studies We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA September, 195>8 ABSTRACT Within a year of his accession to power, Hitler, by concluding a non-aggression pact with Poland and by bringing relations with Russia to an impasse, had revolut• ionized German foreign policy. This policy reversal was chosen, primarily, for tactical reasons and only second• arily for ideological reasons. Prom the outset, it is true, relations with Russia were made difficult by Hitler's per• secution of the German Communist Party and by his own hatred for Bolshevism. But it was only after Poland had twice threatened a preventative war against Germany and after Germany had become diplomatically isolated through her desertion of the League of Nations, that Hitler decided upon a rapprochement with Poland and a break with Russia. This policy was finalized by the German-Polish Non-Aggression Pact of January, 1934• The political orientation of German foreign policy, established by this pact, remained fixed in its outlines for the following five years. During these years, Hitler used the anti-Communist bogey.to justify his foreign policy coups and to ease his relations with Poland. Russia herself, he ignored as a power factor in opposition. Nor did he consider a political understanding with her. However, he did toy with the idea of her as an object of aggression.
    [Show full text]
  • Borders of Trianon Had Been Determined on May 8, 1919, One Year Before the Signing of the Peace Treaty
    FOREWORD The Peace Treaty of Trianon was Hungary’s turn of fate—a second Mohács. Hungary was compelled to sign it in one of the downturns of its history. Pál Teleki, the Prime Minister at that time who presented the peace treaty for parliamentary ratification, filed an indictment against himself in Parliament because he felt responsible... Recently, there has been increased interest concerning the Peace Treaty of Trianon. The subject of Trianon is inexhaustible. Nobody has yet written about Trianon in its complexity, and perhaps it will be long before anyone will. The subject is so complex that it must be studied from different angles, various scientific approaches, and using several methods. It remains unsettled, as its scholars can always discover new perspectives. This study - perhaps best described as a commentary - is not a scientific work. Rather, its goal is to enhance public awareness and offer a more current and realistic synthesis of the Peace Treaty of Trianon while incorporating more recent observations. Intended for a broad audience, its purpose is not to list historical events - as the historians have done and will continue to do - but rather to provide data regarding those geographic, economic and geo- political aspects and their correlation which have received inadequate attention in the literature on Trianon so far. Perhaps this work will also succeed in providing new perspectives. It is not as difficult to interpret and explain the text of the treaty as it is to write about and focus public attention on its spirit and its open and hidden aims. It is difficult - perhaps delicate - to write about its truths, how it really came about, and what effects it had on the Hungarian nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungarian Attempts at the Annexation of Slovakia in 1938 (Part II)
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN PAPERS 2013 / I / 2 51 Hungarian Attempts at the Annexation of Slovakia in 1938 (Part II) István JANEK Magyar Tudományos Akadémia, Bölcsészettudományi Központ, Történettudományi Intézet Research Centre for the Humanities, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Úri u. 53, 1014 Budapest, Hungary [email protected] After the Munich pact The Munich conference took place with the participation of the representatives of England, France, Germany and Italy on 29–30 September 1938. The Hungarian diplomacy tried to make a last effort to have an influence on the Slovak leaders, and therefore Kánya sent the following message to them through the Hungarian consul in Bratislava on 29 September 1938: “They should not ask for autonomy any more but demand the realisation of self-de- termination with all their power, and we shall support them in it. If they do not take our advice, they could blame only themselves.”2 The confidence of the Hungarian leadership was shaken by the fact that the Slovaks showed more and more willingness to turn towards the Germans instead of the Hungarians. As a consequence of the Munich talks, the western powers approved the annexation of the Sudetenland by Germany. Czechoslovakia did not undertake the military defence of the country; without the help of the great powers, it could not seriously think of resisting the German army, and therefore they had to sign the agreement. Ceding the Sudetenland had a catastrophic effect in economic and strategic terms. The Munich Pact sealed the fate of Czechoslovakia. Also Slovakia lost a few settlements: Petržalka,3 a suburb of Bratislava, and Devín4 (an area of 43 square kilometres with a population of 15,566)5 were annexed by Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Transylvanian Review
    RANSYLVANIAN EVIEW Vol. XXVI T R No. 3 /REVUE DE TRANSYLVANIE Autumn 2017 Contents/Sommaire ROMANIAN ACADEMY Chairman: • Paradigms Academician Ionel-Valentin Vlad Es ist die größte Torheit, mit vielen Worten nichts sagen: Eine inhaltliche, sprachliche und CENTER FOR handlungskommunikative Betrachtung über TRANSYLVANIAN STUDIES Martin Luthers Sprichwörter und Redensarten 3 Director: Veronica Câmpian Academician Ioan-Aurel Pop La città di Cluj e la Riforma protestante nel XVI secolo 16 Ioan-Aurel Pop The Irenical Impact of David Pareus’ Work on the Hungarian Protestant Churches 38 Olga Lukács Under the Sway of Orthodoxy and the Reformation: Romanian-Saxon Confessional Relations in Transylvania between 1688 and 1848 54 Mircea-Gheorghe Abrudan • Focus Laudatio 72 Ioan-Aurel Pop Speech by His Royal Highness Charles, Prince of Wales 76 • Transsilvanica Dominikus, Bischof von Cenad (1360–1373) und Oradea (1373–1374), und sein Wirken vor der Bischofsweihe 80 Peter Labanc • Tangencies Revisiting Romania’s Regional Approach: Lessons from the Recent Past 94 On the cover: Horaþiu Sorin Dan ªERBAN SAVU, Mircea Teodor Maniu Bertha as Saint Jerome (2017), oil on canvas, 192×157 cm • Communio The Birth of a Group: Two Roma Micro-Groups Transylvanian Review continues the in Bukovina and Transylvania 109 tradition of Revue de Transylvanie, founded by Silviu Dragomir, which Elena Marushiakova was published in Cluj and then in Sibiu Vesselin Popov between 1934 and 1944. The Rusyns in Romania: Transylvanian Review is published quarterly by the Center for Transylvanian A Minority Hidden in a Minority 124 Studies and the Romanian Academy. Marc Stegherr EDITORIAL BOARD • Philosophy CESARE ALZATI, Ph.D. Seduction, Communication and Leadership 137 Facoltà di Scienze della Formazione, Istituto di Storia Moderna e Contemporanea, Sandu Frunzã Università Cattolica, Milan, Italy • Book Reviews HORST FASSEL, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungary and the Hungarians
    S.J. MAGYARÓDY Hungary and the Hungarians MATTHIAS CORVINUS PUBLISHERS Editor: Szabolcs J. Magyarody Principal translators: Péter Csermely, István Hegedűs Dr. Csaba Horváth, Judit Jókay Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-882785-23-1 Library of Congress Control Number: 2012947893 All expenses were contributed by North-American Hungarians No governments or government supported organizations contributed a single penny to the publication of this book and CD 2 CONTENTS FOREWORD ................................................................................................ 5 WHO ARE WE? ........................................................................................... 7 C. A. Macartney D. Litt. HUNGARY – A SHORT HISTORY * .................... 9 Fritz-Konrad Krüger HUNGARY AND WORLD WAR I. .......................... 18 László Gulyás A SHORT HISTORY OF THE TREATY OF TRIANON ..... 26 Yves De Daruvar THE TRAGIC FATE OF HUNGARY ............................ 33 John Flournoy Montgomery OPINION OF AN AMERICAN DIPLOMAT 38 J. F. Montgomery HUNGARIAN DECLARATION OF WAR ..................... 42 S.J. Magyaródy THE CENTRAL EUROPEAN SYNDROME .................... 47 RECOVERY OF LOST TERRITORIES ...................................................... 50 Dr. Edward Chászár THE FIRST VIENNA AWARD ................................. 52 RETAKING SUBCARPATHIA ................................................................... 54 THE SECOND VIENNA AWARD .............................................................. 56 TERRITORY CEDED BY ROUMANIA
    [Show full text]