DOCSLIB.ORG

Acta Botanica Fennica

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SOCIETAS PRO FAUNA ET FLORA FENNICA ACTA BOTANICA FENNICA 89 Pekka Isoviita: Dillenius's 'Historia muscorum' as the basis of hepatic nomenclature, and S. 0. Lindberg's collection of Dillenian bryophytes SOCIETAS p FAUNA BT J1LOltA FENNICA HELSINKI- HELSINGFORS 1970 ACTA BOTANICA FENNICA 1-19 vide Acta Botanica Fennica 20-50. 20-49 vide Acta Botanica Fennica 50- 82. 50. Hans Luther: Verbreitung und Ökologie der höheren Wasserpflanzen im Brack­ wasser der Ekenäs-Gegend in Südfinnland. II. Spezieller Teil. 370 S. (1951). 51. M. R. Droop: On the ecology of Flagellates from some brackish and fresh water rockpools of Finland. 52 pp. (1953). 52. Haus Luther: Über Vaucheria arrhyncha Heidinger und die Heterokonten-Ordnung Vaucheriales Bohlin. 24 S. (1953). 53. Erust Häyren: Wasser- und Uferpflanzen aus dem Päijänne-Gebiet. 42 S. (1954). 54. Lars Fagerström: Växtgeografiska studier i Strömfors-Pyttis skärgärd i östra Nyland med speciellt beaktande av lövängarna, artan talet samt en del arters för• delning och invandring. 296 s. (1954). 55. Haus Luther: Über Krustenbewuchs an Steinen fliessender Gewässer, speziell in Südfinnland. 61 S. (1954). 56. llmari Hustich: Notes on the growth of Scotch Pine in Utsjoki in northernmost Finland. 13 pp. (1956). 57. Henrik Skult: Skogsbotaniska studier i Skärgärdshavet med speciell hänsyn till förhällandena i Korpo utskär. 244 s. (1956). 58. Roll Grönblad, Gerald A. Prowse and Artbur M. Scott: Sudanese Desmids. 82 pp. (1958). 59. Max von Schantz: Über das ätherische Öl beim Kalmus, Acorus calamus L. Phar­ makognostische Untersuchung. 138 S. (1958). 60. Harald Lindberg: Växter, kända frän Norden, i Linnes herbarium. Plantae e septen­ trione cognitae in herbario Linnaei. 133 pp. (1958). 61. Alvar Palmgren: Studier över havsstrandens vegetation och flora pä Aland. I. Vegetationen. 268 s. (1961). 62. Haus Luther: Veränderungen in der Gefässpflanzenflora der Meeresfelsen von Tvär• minne. 100 S. (1961). 63. Roll Grönblad: Sudanese Desmids II. 19 pp. (1962). 64. Veikko Lappalainen: The shore-line displacement on southern Lake Saimaa. 125 pp. (1962). 65. J. J. Donner: The zoning of the Post-Glacial pollen diagrams in Finland and the main changes in the forest composition. 40 pp. (1963). 66. Roll Grönblad, Artbur M. Scott and Bannah Croasdale: Desmids from Uganda and Lake Victoria, collected by Dr. Edna M. Lind. 57 pp. (1964). 67. Carl Eric Sonck: Die Gefässpflanzenflora von Pielisjärvi und Lieksa, Nordkarelien 311 s. (1964). 68. F. W. Klingstedt: mber Farbenreaktionen von Flechten der Gattung Usnea. 23 S. (1965). 69. Artbur M. Scott, Rolf Grönblad and Bannah Croasdale: Desmids from the Amazon Basin, Brazil, collected by Dr. H. Sioli. 94 pp. (1965). 70. Teuvo Ahti: Parmelia olivacea and the allied non-isidiate and non-sorediate cor­ ticolous Iichens in the Northern Hemisphere. 68 pp. (1966). 71. Simo Juvonen: Über die die Terpenbiosynthese beeinflussenden Faktoren in Pinus silvestris L. 92 S. (1966). 72. Leena Hämet-Ahti: Some races of Juncus articulatw L. in Finland. 22 pp. (1966). 73. Max von Schantz und Simo Juvonen: Chemotaxonomische Untersuchungen in der Gattung Picea. 51 S. (1966). 74. Dkka Kytövuori and Juha Suominen: The flora of Ikkalanniemi (commune of Virrat, Central Finland), studied independently by two persons. 59 pp. (1967). 75. Leena Himet-Ahti: Tripleurospermum (Compositae) in the northern parts of Scandinavia, Finland and Russia. 19 pp. (1967). ACTA BOTA ICA FENNICA 89 EDIDIT SOCIETAS PRO FAUNA ET FLORA FEN ICA DILLENIUS 'S ' HISTORIA MUSCORUM' AS THE BASIS OF HEPATIC NOMENCLATURE, AND S. 0. LINDBERG'S COLLECTION OF DILLENIAN BRYOPHYTES BY PEKKA ISOVIITA BOTANICAL MUSEUM, UN IVERSITY OF HELSINKI HELSI KI-HELSI GFORS 1970 Acta Bot. Fennica 89. 28 pp. Nov. 1970 PR1NTED BY TlLG:uA.'-'N HELSINK1-HELSINGFORS 1970 Abstract The principles and different possibilities involved in the typification of Linnaeus's specific names of Hepaticae are discussed. Dillenius's 'Historia muscorum' appears to be the foremost source of Linnaeus's Hepaticae species, and thus Dillenius's herbarium of the 'Historia muscorum' usually forms the best basis for the typification of the names given to them by Linnaeus. Linnaeus's own material was fairly limited, and only a few names can be typified from his herbarium. The neglected collection of Dillenius's speci­ mens of Hepaticae in the herbarium of S. 0. Lindberg in Helsinki is presented, and a comprehensive !ist is given of specific names whose protologues contain a reference to a Dillenian species of Hepaticae. Same nomenclatural problems of Hepaticae are mentioned. Lindberg's collection of Dillenius's specimens of :\fusci is also presented. Contents I. Introduction II. Linnaeus's 'Species plantarum' as the starting point of the nomenclature of Hepaticae, and the importance of Dillenius's 'Historia muscorum' ......... 5 A. Linnaeus as a hepaticologist ................................... ... 5 B. Typification of Linnaeus's specific names of Hepaticae ... .... ... .. 6 1. The Linnaean Herbarium .. .. ........... .. ............. 0 •••••••• 6 2. Other Linnaean collections . .... .. .... ..... .... .. ...... 8 3. Typification through references: Micheli citations . .. .. .. 0 •••• 0 0 ••• • 9 4. Importance of the references to Dillenius's monograph ....... ...... 11 C. Importance of Dillenius's specimens for the typification of the Hepaticae described by other authors, and of other Cryptogamia ............... III. 'Hepaticae ex herbario Dillenii' of Lindberg, and a synopsis of the nomenclatural importance of Dillenius's specimens of Hepaticae o ••••••••••••••••••••• 0 • 15 IV. 'Musci veri ex herbario Dillenii' of Lindberg 0 0 •••••• • • o ••••• •• ••••••••••• • 24 V. Utilization of Lindberg's Dillenian collections .. .. o • •••• o • o •••••••••••••• 24 Sum.mary ..... ...... 0 • •••••••• • • •• ••••••••••••• • ••••• • •••••• 0 •••• 0 • • • 0 • •• 25 Acknowledgements . ..... o ••• 0 •••••• • ••••••• • • o. 0 •• ••• • • • •• • ••• • ••••••• • • 25 References 26 4 P. Isov_iita: Dillenius's 'Historia muscorum· I. lntroduction In the early cryptogamic taxonomy the publication of J. J. DILLENrus's 'Historia muscorum' in 1741 was one of the most epoch-making events. 'The thorough descriptions and the 85 copperplates - each containing numerous figures - of this quarto-sized monograph were regularly used and cited by students of cryptogams up till the early 1800's. Even today it is an important nomendatural source. The plant collection on which DILLENIUS mainly based his illustrations and descriptions is still at the Department of Botany of the University of Oxford (OXF). Several investigations have been made on the mosses, liverworts and lichens of this herbarium of 'Historia muscorum'. Regarding the bryophytes, the profound revision by S. 0. LINDBERG (1883; see also LINDBERG 1874, 1877) deserves particular mention (for lichens, see CRoMEIE 1880). In his taxonomic and nomendatural investigations of bryophytes, LIND­ BERG showed special interest in clarifying the early phases of this field of research, and published several valuable papers on this subject. As a conse­ quence of these studies, LINDBERG's herbarium (H-SOV, Botanical Museum of the University of Helsinki), which is known tobe rich in the specimens of contemporary bryologists, contains also specimens of many of the pioneers, e.g., A. BuDDLE, S. VAILLANT, F. EHRHART, J. DICKSON, 0. SwARTZ, H . A. ScHRADER, J. C. SCHLEICHER, and G. WAHLENBERG. The Dillenian bryophyte collection was studied by I,INDBERG in Oxford in 1872. He very well knew the particular importance of this collection and with deep gratitude reported that M. A. LAWSON, Sherardian Professor of Botany in Oxford, had permitted him to take with him small pieces of DILLENrus's specimens, for their critical identification in Helsinki (LrNDBERG 1877:14, 1883:10). He, however, failed to mention that he had carefully preserved these small samples and arranged them as a special collection. After the death of LINDBERG in 1889, hisherbariumwas purchased by the University of Helsinki, and the small but valuable collection of Dillenian spec­ imens was specially mentioned (SAELAJ-< et al. 1890:6) in connection with this transaction. Nevertheless, for nearly 80 years from that date no information regarding these specimens was available, and they were totally forgotten and neglected, until the collection was found fairly recently among the material of LINDBERG at the Botanical Museum of the University of Helsinki. It was in the same excellent condition as it was left by LINDBERG himself, and this dis­ covery led to the present study, whose aim is to assess the nomenclatural im­ portance of DILLENius's 'Historia muscorum' and herbarium specimens. 1 S. 0. LINDBERG's bryophyte herbarium is kept as a separate collection. Its abbrevia­ tion, H-SOL, will be mentioned in the neJ.:t edition of 'Index herbariorum'. ACTA BOTANICA FENNICA 89 5 li. Linnaeus's 'Species plantarum' as the starting point of the nomenclature of Hepaticae, and the importance of Dillenius's 'Historia muscorum' In cantrast to the situation with many other cryptogam groups, LrNNAEus's 'Species plantarum' (1753) has been ruled as the ;nomenclatural starting point of the Hepaticae. However, this decision does not in any way mean that LINNAEUS should be regarded as more of a specialist in hepatics than, for example, in mosses. In this connection, it is not possible or necessary to discuss in detail the descriptive method of LrKNAEUS and the general principles of the typification of the specific names published
Recommended publications
  • Chemical Constituents of 25 Liverworts

    Chemical Constituents of 25 Liverworts

    J. Hattori Bot. Lab. No. 74: 121- 138 (Nov. 1993) CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS OF 25 LIVERWORTS 1 1 TOSHIHIRO HASHIMOT0 , YOSHINORI ASAKAWA , KATSUYUK.l NAKASHIMA1 AND MOTOO Toru1 ABSTRACT. Twenty-five liverworts were investigated chemically and 20 new compounds isolated and their structures characterized by spectroscopic evidence, X-ray analysis and chemical correlation. The chemosystematics of each species is discussed. INTRODUCTION Liverworts are rich sources of terpenoids and lipophilic aromatic compounds; these are very valuable for chemosystematic investigation. Previously, we have reported the chemical constituents of 700 species of liverworts and discussed the chemosystematics at family and genus level (Asakawa l 982a, b; 1993, Asakawa & Inoue l 984a; l 987a). Here we report the isolation and distribution of the terpenoids and aromatic compounds of 25 liverworts and discuss the chemical markers of each species. EXPERJMENTALS The liverworts collected in Japan and other countries shown in Table 1, were purified and dried for 1 to 7 days and then ground mechanically and extracted with ether or methanol for 7 to 30 days. Each extract was filtered and the solvent evaporated to give green crude oils, followed by chromatography on silica gel or Sephadex LH-20, using n­ hexane-ethyl acetate (EtOAc) and methanol-chloroform (1 : 1), respectively. Each fraction was further purified by a combination of preparative TLC (n-hexane-EtOAc 4 : 1) and preparative HPLC (µ.porasil; n-hexane-EtOAc 2 : 1). The stereostructures were elucidated by the analysis of spectroscopic data (UV, IR, MS, NMR and CD) and X-ray analysis or chemical correlation. The stereostructures of each compound characterized by the above methods are shown in Chart 1 and the structural elucidation of the new compounds will be reported elsewhere.
  • Aquatic and Wet Marchantiophyta, Order Metzgeriales: Aneuraceae

    Aquatic and Wet Marchantiophyta, Order Metzgeriales: Aneuraceae

    Glime, J. M. 2021. Aquatic and Wet Marchantiophyta, Order Metzgeriales: Aneuraceae. Chapt. 1-11. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte 1-11-1 Ecology. Volume 4. Habitat and Role. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 11 April 2021 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 1-11: AQUATIC AND WET MARCHANTIOPHYTA, ORDER METZGERIALES: ANEURACEAE TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBCLASS METZGERIIDAE ........................................................................................................................................... 1-11-2 Order Metzgeriales............................................................................................................................................................... 1-11-2 Aneuraceae ................................................................................................................................................................... 1-11-2 Aneura .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1-11-2 Aneura maxima ............................................................................................................................................................ 1-11-2 Aneura mirabilis .......................................................................................................................................................... 1-11-7 Aneura pinguis ..........................................................................................................................................................
  • Conservation and Ecology of Bryophytes in Partially Harvested Boreal Mixed-Wood Forests of West-Central Canada

    Conservation and Ecology of Bryophytes in Partially Harvested Boreal Mixed-Wood Forests of West-Central Canada

    University of Alberta Conservation and ecology of bryophytes in partially harvested boreal mixed-wood forests of west-central Canada by Richard Theodore Caners A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Conservation Biology Department of Renewable Resources ©Richard Theodore Caners Fall 2010 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission. Examining Committee S. Ellen Macdonald, Renewable Resources, University of Alberta René J. Belland, Renewable Resources, University of Alberta Mark R. T. Dale, Biological Sciences, University of Northern British Columbia Dennis L. Gignac, Biological Sciences, University of Alberta Lars Söderström, Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology Abstract This thesis examined the efficacy of residual forest structure for the preservation and recovery of bryophytes five to six years after partial canopy harvest in boreal mixed-wood forests of northwestern Alberta, Canada. Bryophytes were sampled in two forest types that differed in pre-harvest abundance of broadleaf (primarily Populus tremuloides Michx.
  • About the Book the Format Acknowledgments

    About the Book the Format Acknowledgments

    About the Book For more than ten years I have been working on a book on bryophyte ecology and was joined by Heinjo During, who has been very helpful in critiquing multiple versions of the chapters. But as the book progressed, the field of bryophyte ecology progressed faster. No chapter ever seemed to stay finished, hence the decision to publish online. Furthermore, rather than being a textbook, it is evolving into an encyclopedia that would be at least three volumes. Having reached the age when I could retire whenever I wanted to, I no longer needed be so concerned with the publish or perish paradigm. In keeping with the sharing nature of bryologists, and the need to educate the non-bryologists about the nature and role of bryophytes in the ecosystem, it seemed my personal goals could best be accomplished by publishing online. This has several advantages for me. I can choose the format I want, I can include lots of color images, and I can post chapters or parts of chapters as I complete them and update later if I find it important. Throughout the book I have posed questions. I have even attempt to offer hypotheses for many of these. It is my hope that these questions and hypotheses will inspire students of all ages to attempt to answer these. Some are simple and could even be done by elementary school children. Others are suitable for undergraduate projects. And some will take lifelong work or a large team of researchers around the world. Have fun with them! The Format The decision to publish Bryophyte Ecology as an ebook occurred after I had a publisher, and I am sure I have not thought of all the complexities of publishing as I complete things, rather than in the order of the planned organization.
  • North American H&A Names

    North American H&A Names

    A very tentative and preliminary list of North American liverworts and hornworts, doubtless containing errors and omissions, but forming a basis for updating the spreadsheet of recognized genera and numbers of species, November 2010. Liverworts Blasiales Blasiaceae Blasia L. Blasia pusilla L. Fossombroniales Calyculariaceae Calycularia Mitt. Calycularia crispula Mitt. Calycularia laxa Lindb. & Arnell Fossombroniaceae Fossombronia Raddi Fossombronia alaskana Steere & Inoue Fossombronia brasiliensis Steph. Fossombronia cristula Austin Fossombronia foveolata Lindb. Fossombronia hispidissima Steph. Fossombronia lamellata Steph. Fossombronia macounii Austin Fossombronia marshii J. R. Bray & Stotler Fossombronia pusilla (L.) Dumort. Fossombronia longiseta (Austin) Austin Note: Fossombronia longiseta was based on a mixture of material belonging to three different species of Fossombronia; Schuster (1992a p. 395) lectotypified F. longiseta with the specimen of Austin, Hepaticae Boreali-Americani 118 at H. An SEM of one spore from this specimen was previously published by Scott and Pike (1988 fig. 19) and it is clearly F. pusilla. It is not at all clear why Doyle and Stotler (2006) apply the name to F. hispidissima. Fossombronia texana Lindb. Fossombronia wondraczekii (Corda) Dumort. Fossombronia zygospora R.M. Schust. Petalophyllum Nees & Gottsche ex Lehm. Petalophyllum ralfsii (Wilson) Nees & Gottsche ex Lehm. Moerckiaceae Moerckia Gottsche Moerckia blyttii (Moerch) Brockm. Moerckia hibernica (Hook.) Gottsche Pallaviciniaceae Pallavicinia A. Gray, nom. cons. Pallavicinia lyellii (Hook.) Carruth. Pelliaceae Pellia Raddi, nom. cons. Pellia appalachiana R.M. Schust. (pro hybr.) Pellia endiviifolia (Dicks.) Dumort. Pellia endiviifolia (Dicks.) Dumort. ssp. alpicola R.M. Schust. Pellia endiviifolia (Dicks.) Dumort. ssp. endiviifolia Pellia epiphylla (L.) Corda Pellia megaspora R.M. Schust. Pellia neesiana (Gottsche) Limpr. Pellia neesiana (Gottsche) Limpr.
  • Porella Perrottetiana (Porellaceae, Marchantiophyta) a Species from the Western Ghats of Kerala

    Porella Perrottetiana (Porellaceae, Marchantiophyta) a Species from the Western Ghats of Kerala

    Acta Botanica Hungarica 59(1–2), pp. 269–272, 2017 DOI: 10.1556/034.59.2017.1-2.9 PORELLA PERROTTETIANA (PORELLACEAE, MARCHANTIOPHYTA) A SPECIES FROM THE WESTERN GHATS OF KERALA B. Mufeed and C. N. Manju* Department of Botany, Zamorin’s Guruvayurappan College (affiliated to the University of Calicut), Kozhikode-14, Kerala-673014, India *E-mail: [email protected] (Received 1 November, 2016; Accepted 15 December, 2016) Porella perrottetiana Trev. is reported from the Western Ghats of Kerala. This is the first record of this species from Kerala. Key words: Kerala, little known, new record, Porella perrottetiana, Porellaceae INTRODUCTION Porella is the best known and widely distributed tropical genus of the order Porellales with about 60 species in the world and 27 taxa in India (Dan- dotiya et al. 2011, Daniels 2010, Nair et al. 2005, Singh and Nath 2007, Singh and Singh 2006, 2015). Chopra (1943) recorded a few species from South India. Most of the genera earlier reported from South India were under Madotheca and Hattori (1978, 1979) synonymised all the species known under Madotheca to Porella. Hence a total of eight species, one variety and one subspecies viz., Porella acutifolia (Lehm. et Lindenb.) Trevis. var. acutifolia, Porella caespitans (Steph.) S. Hatt. var. cordifolia (Steph.) S. Hatt., Porella campylophylla (Lehm. et Lindb.) Trevis. subsp. campylophylla, Porella campylophylla (Lehm. et Lindb.) Trevis. subsp. lancistipula (Steph.) S. Hatt., Porella chinensis (Steph.) S. Hatt. var. chinensis, Porella chinensis (Steph.) S. Hatt. var. irregularis (Steph.) S. Hatt., Porella kashyapii (R. S. Chopra) Kachroo, Porella madagascariensis (Nees et Mont.) Trevis., Porella perrottetiana (Mont.) Trevis.
  • A Taxonomic Revision of Aneuraceae (Marchantiophyta) from Eastern Africa with an Interactive Identification Key

    A Taxonomic Revision of Aneuraceae (Marchantiophyta) from Eastern Africa with an Interactive Identification Key

    cryptogamie Bryologie 2019 ● 41 ● 2 DIRECTEUR DE LA PUBLICATION : Bruno David, Président du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle RÉDACTEURS EN CHEF / EDITORS-IN-CHIEF : Denis LAMY, Michelle Price ASSISTANTS DE RÉDACTION / ASSISTANT EDITORS : Marianne SALAÜN ([email protected]) MISE EN PAGE / PAGE LAYOUT : Marianne SALAÜN RÉDACTEURS ASSOCIÉS / ASSOCIATE EDITORS Biologie moléculaire et phylogénie / Molecular biology and phylogeny Bernard GOFFINET Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut (United States) Mousses d’Europe / European mosses Isabel DRAPER Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global (CIBC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain) Francisco LARA GARCÍA Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global (CIBC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain) Mousses d’Afrique et d’Antarctique / African and Antarctic mosses Rysiek OCHYRA Laboratory of Bryology, Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow (Pologne) Bryophytes d’Asie / Asian bryophytes Rui-Liang ZHU School of Life Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai (China) Bioindication / Biomonitoring Franck-Olivier DENAYER Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques de Lille, Laboratoire de Botanique et de Cryptogamie, Lille (France) Écologie des bryophytes / Ecology of bryophyte Nagore GARCÍA MEDINA Department of Biology (Botany), and Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global (CIBC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain) COUVERTURE / COVER : From top left, to bottom right, by
  • Lejeunea Mandonii (Steph.) Müll.Frib

    Lejeunea Mandonii (Steph.) Müll.Frib

    Lejeunea mandonii (Steph.) Müll.Frib. Atlantic lejeunea LEJEUNEACEAE SYN.: Microlejeunea mandonii Steph., Lejeunea macvicari Pearson, Inflatolejeunea mandonii (Steph.) Perss. Status Bryophyte RDB - Endangered (2001) English Nature Species Recovery Status in Europe: Rare BAP Priority Species Lead Partner: Plantlife International UK Biodiversity Action Plan This is the current BAP target following the 2001 Targets Review: T1 - Maintain at all known, new or re-discovered sites. Progress on targets as reported in the UKBAP 2002 reporting round can be viewed online at: http://www.ukbap.org.uk/2002OnlineReport/mainframe.htm The full Action Plan for Lejeunea mandonii can be viewed on the following web page: http://www.ukbap.org.uk/asp/UKplans.asp?UKListID=406. Plantlife published an Expanded Species Action Plan for Lejeunea mandonii in 1999. Contents 1 Morphology, Identification, Taxonomy & Genetics................................................2 1.1 Morphology & Identification ........................................................................2 1.2 Taxonomic Considerations ..........................................................................4 1.3 Genetic Implications ..................................................................................4 2 Distribution & Current Status ...........................................................................5 2.1 World ......................................................................................................5 2.2 Europe ....................................................................................................5
  • Article ISSN 1179-3163 (Online Edition)

    Article ISSN 1179-3163 (Online Edition)

    Phytotaxa 63: 21–68 (2012) ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2012 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) Early Land Plants Today: Index of Liverworts & Hornworts 2009–2010 LARS SÖDERSTRÖM1, ANDERS HAGBORG2, MARSHALL R. CROSBY3 & MATT VON KONRAT2 1 Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway; [email protected] 2 Department of Botany, The Field Museum, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605–2496, U.S.A.;[email protected], [email protected] 3 Missouri Botanical Garden, P. O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO 63166–0299 U.S.A.; [email protected] Abstract A widely accessible list of known plant species is a fundamental requirement for plant conservation and has vast applications. An index of published names of liverworts and hornworts between 2009 and 2010 is provided as part of a continued effort in working toward producing a world checklist of this group. Included in the list are also names overlooked by earlier indices. The list includes 30 higher taxa, 250 species, 52 infraspecific taxa, 31 autonyms, and two fossils for 2009 and 2010. A number of taxa not covered by the earlier indices for 2000-2008 are also included. Key words: Liverworts, hornworts, index, nomenclature Introduction Under the auspices of the Early Land Plants Today project, there has been a strong community-driven effort attempting to address the critical need to synthesize the vast nomenclatural, taxonomic and global distributional data for liverworts (Marchantiophyta) and hornworts (Anthocerotophyta) (von Konrat et al. 2010a). These endeavours are critical in providing the foundation to develop a working checklist of liverworts and hornworts worldwide; the first version is projected to be published in 2012.
  • The Bryophytes of Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly

    The Bryophytes of Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly

    THE BRYOPHYTES OF CORNWALL AND THE ISLES OF SCILLY by David T. Holyoak Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................ 2 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 3 Scope and aims .......................................................................... 3 Coverage and treatment of old records ...................................... 3 Recording since 1993 ................................................................ 5 Presentation of data ................................................................... 6 NOTES ON SPECIES .......................................................................... 8 Introduction and abbreviations ................................................. 8 Hornworts (Anthocerotophyta) ................................................. 15 Liverworts (Marchantiophyta) ................................................. 17 Mosses (Bryophyta) ................................................................. 98 COASTAL INFLUENCES ON BRYOPHYTE DISTRIBUTION ..... 348 ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN BRYOPHYTE DISTRIBUTION ..... 367 BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................ 394 1 Acknowledgements Mrs Jean A. Paton MBE is thanked for use of records, gifts and checking of specimens, teaching me to identify liverworts, and expertise freely shared. Records have been used from the Biological Records Centre (Wallingford): thanks are due to Dr M.O. Hill and Dr C.D. Preston for
  • (Special) Issue 2, Pages 1-285

    (Special) Issue 2, Pages 1-285

    NVEO 2014, Volume 1, Issue 2 CONTENTS 1. 45th International Symposium on Essential Oils (45th ISEO). / Pages: 1-285 Kemal Başer ISEO 2014 Abstracts Nat. Vol. Essent. Oils, Special Issue 2014 NVEO NATURAL VOLATILES & ESSENTIAL OILS A Quarterly Open Access Scientific Journal Editor in Chief Associate Editor Editorial Secretary K. Hüsnü Can Başer Fatih Demirci Gökalp İşcan Editorial Board Yoshinori Asakawa (Japan) Stanislaw Lochynski (Poland) Gerhard Buchbauer (Austria) Agnieszka Ludwiczuk (Poland) Salvador Canigueral (Spain) Massimo Maffei (İtaly) Jan Demyttenaere (Belgium) Luigi Mondello (Italy) Nativ Dudai (Israel) Johannes Novak (Austria) Ana Cristina Figueiredo (Portugal) Nurhayat Tabanca (USA) Chlodwig Franz (Austria) Temel Özek (Turkey) Jan Karlsen (Norway) Alvaro Viljoen (South Africa) Karl-Heinz Kubeczka (Germany) Sandy van Vuuren (South Africa) Éva Németh-Zámboriné (Hungary) Publisher: Badebio Ltd. Turkey Scope NVEO is a major forum for the publication of new findings and research into natural volatiles and essential oils. It is created by the Permanent Scientific Committee of ISEO (International Symposium on Essential Oils). The journal is principally aimed at publishing proceedings of the ISEOs, but is also a peer reviewed journal for publishing original research articles and reviews in the field of natural volatiles and essential oils including wide ranging related issues on the analysis, chemistry, biological and pharmacological activities, applications and regulatory affairs, etc. Published four times per year, NVEO provides articles on the aromatic principles of biological materials such as plants, animals, insects, microorganisms, etc. and is directed towards furthering readers’ knowledge on advances in this field. Table of Contents Welcome 5 ISEO 2014 Committees 6 ISEO 2014 Topics 6 Supporting Organizations 7 Sponsors 7 ISEO 2014 Registration Awardees 8 General Information 10 Scientific Programme 11 Plenary Lectures 13 Keynote 20 22 Oral Presentations 41 Young Scientist Lectures 51 Poster Presentations 266 Author Index Nat.
  • Article ISSN 2381-9685 (Online Edition)

    Article ISSN 2381-9685 (Online Edition)

    Bry. Div. Evo. 043 (1): 284–306 ISSN 2381-9677 (print edition) DIVERSITY & https://www.mapress.com/j/bde BRYOPHYTEEVOLUTION Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 2381-9685 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/bde.43.1.20 Advances in understanding of mycorrhizal-like associations in bryophytes SILVIA PRESSEL1*, MARTIN I. BIDARTONDO2, KATIE J. FIELD3 & JEFFREY G. DUCKETT1 1Life Sciences Department, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK; �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9652-6338 �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7101-6673 2Imperial College London and Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew TW9 3DS, UK; �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3172-3036 3 Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK; �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5196-2360 * Corresponding author Abstract Mutually beneficial associations between plants and soil fungi, mycorrhizas, are one of the most important terrestrial symbioses. These partnerships are thought to have propelled plant terrestrialisation some 500 million years ago and today they play major roles in ecosystem functioning. It has long been known that bryophytes harbour, in their living tissues, fungal symbionts, recently identified as belonging to the three mycorrhizal fungal lineages Glomeromycotina, Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. Latest advances in understanding of fungal associations in bryophytes have been largely driven by the discovery, nearly a decade ago, that early divergent liverwort clades, including the most basal Haplomitriopsida, and some hornworts, engage with a wider repertoire of fungal symbionts than previously thought, including endogonaceous members of the ancient sub-phylum Mucoromycotina.