DOCSLIB.ORG

Bucchero: Forms and Consumption Patterns in San Giovenale

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bucchero: Forms and Consumption Patterns in San Giovenale Department of Archaeology and Ancient History Bucchero: Forms and consumption patterns in San Giovenale Joacim Seger Master thesis 45 hp in Classical Archaeology and Ancient History VT 2020 Supervisors: Dominic Ingemark & Filmo Verhagen Uppsala University Abstract Seger, J. 2020. Bucchero: Forms and consumption patterns in San Giovenale Seger, J. 2020. Bucchero: Former och konsumtionsmönster i San Giovenale. A Swedish excavation took place in the settlement of San Giovenale between the years 1956 to 1965 to shed further light on Etruscan settlements. During the excavation, a great amount of bucchero was uncovered at the site. This study focusses on the forms of bucchero that were uncovered in the San Giovenale area and how these vessels might be connected to a broader network of the ware. By identifying the forms of bucchero found in the area and by bringing together all the earlier publications concerned with the bucchero finds from San Giovenale, this study tries to look at the bucchero material in its totality. By locating and counting the forms and context in which the bucchero was found, together with the other finds from the area, this study attempts to contextualize and uncover the status of the bucchero ware within the settlement and how this particular ware might be connected with the Etruscan banquets. By bringing all the material together from all the areas in San Giovenale, this study hopes to paint a clearer picture of the bucchero in San Giovenale in terms of form, amount, chronology and spread of bucchero. By studying the bucchero from the settlement of San Giovenale we might greatly enhance our understanding of the bucchero ware outside of the tomb context that it is usually found within. Keywords: Etruscan, San Giovenale, bucchero, ceramics, conspicuous consumption, feasting. Master Thesis in Classical Archaeology and Ancient Archaeology 45 hp. Supervisors: Dominic Ingemark & Filmo Verhagen (ventilated and approved: 2020–08–28) © Joacim Seger Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Uppsala University, Box 626, 75126 Uppsala, Sweden. Cover illustration: Bucchero kantharos. From: San Giovenale IV:1, 63, Fig. 63, No. 19. Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to thank Fredrik Tobin who introduced me to the site of San Giovenale and the bucchero from the site during my stay in Rome 2019. I would also like to thank both Yvonne Backe-Forsberg and Lars Karlsson who has shared their expertise and extended knowledge of the site with me. Last but not least, I would like to thank both Dominic Ingemark and Filmo Verhagen who has been with me through the whole project and who has provided me with amazing support and invaluable feedback. ABBREVATIONS c. Circa. w. With. Fig. Figure. Frg. Fragment. Frgs. Fragments. No. Number. Pl. Plate. SPBC Stratigraphic probe in the bedrock cut. Tab. Table. EBN Excavation of balk in the north. EBNE Excavation of balk in the north east. PUWSWP4 Probe under white stone west of Pozzo 4. Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Aim and purpose ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1. Question formulation .............................................................................................................. 2 1.1.2. San Giovenale ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.1.3. The Swedish Excavation ......................................................................................................... 3 1.2. Earlier research ............................................................................................................................... 4 1.2.1. The catalogues ........................................................................................................................ 5 1.3. Methodological approach ............................................................................................................... 6 1.4. Theoretical approach ...................................................................................................................... 7 1.4.1. Conspicuous consumption ...................................................................................................... 7 1.4.2. Feasting theory........................................................................................................................ 9 2. Bucchero: shapes, techniques, and decoration ................................................................................ 10 2.1. Bucchero....................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.1. Bucchero shapes ................................................................................................................... 12 2.1.2. Technique ............................................................................................................................. 13 2.1.3. Decoration............................................................................................................................. 14 3. Sumptous feasts and the elite .......................................................................................................... 15 3.1. The Etruscan elite ......................................................................................................................... 15 3.2. The banquet .................................................................................................................................. 16 3.3. The last supper ............................................................................................................................. 18 4. Bucchero in San Giovenale ............................................................................................................. 19 4.1 Distribution.................................................................................................................................... 19 4.1.1. The Borgo ............................................................................................................................. 20 4.1.2. Building period I (c. 650–530 BCE) ..................................................................................... 22 4.1.3. Building period II (c. 530/500–430 BCE) ............................................................................ 24 4.1.4. Building period III (c. 430/410 BCE) ................................................................................... 27 4.1.5. Area B ................................................................................................................................... 31 4.1.6. Semi-subterranean building in Area B .................................................................................. 33 4.1.7. Area E ................................................................................................................................... 35 4.1.8. Area F East ........................................................................................................................... 37 4.2. Summary of the colour and shapes .............................................................................................. 46 4.3. Bucchero in context ...................................................................................................................... 47 5. Discussion & Conclusions .............................................................................................................. 52 5.1. The distribution of bucchero in San Giovenale ............................................................................ 52 5.2. Patterns of (un)conspicuous consumption? .................................................................................. 56 5.2.1. Status, wealth, or everyday pottery? ..................................................................................... 57 5.3 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 58 Bibliography ........................................................................................................................................ 59 Ancient sources ................................................................................................................................... 59 Published sources ................................................................................................................................ 59 List of figures ...................................................................................................................................... 62 Figures ................................................................................................................................................. 62 Tables .................................................................................................................................................. 62 Annex 1. .............................................................................................................................................. 63 1. Introduction One of the broadest and perhaps one of the most fundamental use of clay has been to create containers such as pottery vessels. Pottery containers may be used for carrying anything from liquids to dry substances as well as being used for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Umbria from the Iron Age to the Augustan Era
    UMBRIA FROM THE IRON AGE TO THE AUGUSTAN ERA PhD Guy Jolyon Bradley University College London BieC ILONOIK.] ProQuest Number: 10055445 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10055445 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Abstract This thesis compares Umbria before and after the Roman conquest in order to assess the impact of the imposition of Roman control over this area of central Italy. There are four sections specifically on Umbria and two more general chapters of introduction and conclusion. The introductory chapter examines the most important issues for the history of the Italian regions in this period and the extent to which they are relevant to Umbria, given the type of evidence that survives. The chapter focuses on the concept of state formation, and the information about it provided by evidence for urbanisation, coinage, and the creation of treaties. The second chapter looks at the archaeological and other available evidence for the history of Umbria before the Roman conquest, and maps the beginnings of the formation of the state through the growth in social complexity, urbanisation and the emergence of cult places.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Greek Vessels Pattern and Image
    ANCIENT GREEK VESSELS PATTERN AND IMAGE 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It is my pleasure to acknowledge the many individuals who helped make this exhibition possible. As the first collaboration between The Trout Gallery at Dickinson College and Bryn Mawr and Wilson Colleges, we hope that this exhibition sets a precedent of excellence and substance for future collaborations of this sort. At Wilson College, Robert K. Dickson, Associate Professor of Fine Art and Leigh Rupinski, College Archivist, enthusiasti- cally supported loaning the ancient Cypriot vessels seen here from the Barron Blewett Hunnicutt Classics ANCIENT Gallery/Collection. Emily Stanton, an Art History Major, Wilson ’15, prepared all of the vessels for our initial selection and compiled all existing documentation on them. At Bryn Mawr, Brian Wallace, Curator and Academic Liaison for Art and Artifacts, went out of his way to accommodate our request to borrow several ancient Greek GREEK VESSELS vessels at the same time that they were organizing their own exhibition of works from the same collection. Marianne Weldon, Collections Manager for Special Collections, deserves special thanks for not only preparing PATTERN AND IMAGE the objects for us to study and select, but also for providing images, procuring new images, seeing to the docu- mentation and transport of the works from Bryn Mawr to Carlisle, and for assisting with the installation. She has been meticulous in overseeing all issues related to the loan and exhibition, for which we are grateful. At The Trout Gallery, Phil Earenfight, Director and Associate Professor of Art History, has supported every idea and With works from the initiative that we have proposed with enthusiasm and financial assistance, without which this exhibition would not have materialized.
    [Show full text]
  • Etruscan Biophilia Viewed Through Magical Amber
    University of Mississippi eGrove Honors College (Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors Theses Honors College) Spring 5-9-2020 Etruscan Biophilia Viewed through Magical Amber Greta Rose Koshenina University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis Part of the Classical Archaeology and Art History Commons, and the Other Classics Commons Recommended Citation Koshenina, Greta Rose, "Etruscan Biophilia Viewed through Magical Amber" (2020). Honors Theses. 1432. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis/1432 This Undergraduate Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College (Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College) at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ETRUSCAN BIOPHILIA VIEWED THROUGH MAGICAL AMBER by Greta Rose Koshenina A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of Mississippi in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College. Oxford May 2020 Approved by ___________________________________ Advisor: Dr. Jacqueline DiBiasie-Sammons ___________________________________ Reader: Dr. Molly Pasco-Pranger ___________________________________ Reader: Dr. John Samonds © 2020 Greta Rose Koshenina ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii DEDICATION I dedicate this thesis with gratitude to my advisors in both America and Italy: to Dr. Jacqueline DiBiasie-Sammons who endured spotty skype meetings during my semester abroad and has been a tremendous help every step of the way, to Giampiero Bevagna who helped translate Italian books and articles and showed our archaeology class necropoleis of Etruria, and to Dr. Brooke Porter who helped me see my research through the eyes of a marine biologist.
    [Show full text]
  • AP Art History Etruscan Study Guide
    AP Art History Etruscan Study Guide "The architect should be equipped with knowledge of many branches of study and varied kinds of learning, for it is by his judgement that all work done by the other arts is put to test. This knowledge is the child of practice and theory." -Vitruvius, 1st century ce, The 10 Books on Architecture, Preface, section 3 TIMELINE Textbook Ch. 6 (pp. 156-213) Villanovan Orientalizing Archaic Classical Hellenistic 900 BCE 700- 600 BCE 600-480 BCE 480-323 BCE 323-89 BCE Founding of Rome, First Etruscan king Expulsion of Peace between Roman conquest of 753 BCE of Rome (Tarquinius Etruscan kings from Rome and Cerveteri, 273 BCE Priscus), 616-578 Rome, 509 BCE Tarquinia, 351 BCE BCE End of Social War and completion of the Romanization of Italy, 89 BCE Vocabulary Differences between Greek and Etruscan Temples 1. Necropolis Greek Etruscan 2. Stucco •stone, marble •wood, mudbrick 3. Terra-cotta •stylobate •podium with staircase leading •fluting, no base on Doric, to entrance 4. Triclinium surrounded structure •widely spread, in the front to 5. Tufa •stone-gable roof distinguish front and back and •one cella, house deity created porch 6. Tumulus •pedimental sculptures, •roof statues on raking cornice, 7. Tuscan order caryatids, metopes narrative •house statues of Gods for •3 cellas for Tunia, Uni, Menrva worship, sculptural mass – •shelters the gods, about the perfect harmony, unified structure Image Set Key Ideas *Temple of Minerva, Veii, Italy Etruscan art is characterized by a pantheon of gods celebrated in large civic 510-500 BCE and religious buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Founding of the City
    1 The Founding of the City 1. The environment of rome’s early hisTory Italy: A Geographically Fragmented Land italy is not a naturally unified land. It is a mosaic of different regions and sub-regions that through- out history have had difficulty communicating with each other. It lacks a large natural “center” the way, for instance, France and England have geographically coherent central homelands, or as Egypt or Mesopotamia had in antiquity. Symbolic of the way the ancients thought about Italy was the fact that for a good portion of their history, Romans did not think of the Po valley, today Italy’s most productive region, as part of Italy, and with good reason. The Po constituted what amounted to a separate country, being generally more in contact with continental Europe through the Brenner Pass than with peninsular Italy to the south where the Apennines impeded communications. The Romans called the Po valley Gallia Cisalpina—that is, “Gaul-on-this-side-of-the-alps.” (Gaul proper or modern france was Gallia Transalpina—“Gaul-on-the other side-of-the-alps”). it was an alien land inhabited by Gauls (Gaels—or, as we know them more commonly, Celts). Vestiges of this sense of regional diversity persist to the present. An active political movement currently seeks to detach northern Italy from the rest of the country, arguing that as the most developed and wealthiest part of italy, the north should not be forced to subsidize backward parts of southern Italy and Sicily. Other parts of Italy besides the Po valley are still difficult to reach from each other.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chronological Implications of Relief Ware Bucchero at Poggio Civitate
    Etruscan Studies Journal of the Etruscan Foundation Volume 11 Article 3 2008 The hrC onological Implications of Relief Ware Bucchero at Poggio Civitate Anthony Tuck University of Massachusetts Amherst Erik O. Nielsen Franklin College Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/etruscan_studies Recommended Citation Tuck, Anthony and Nielsen, Erik O. (2008) "The hrC onological Implications of Relief Ware Bucchero at Poggio Civitate," Etruscan Studies: Vol. 11 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/etruscan_studies/vol11/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Etruscan Studies by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Chronological Implications of Relief Ware Bucchero at Poggio Civitate by Anthony Tuck and Erik Nielsen iano del Tesoro at Poggio Civitate Preserves evidence of the only 7th century BCE architectural comPlex known to date in Central Italy. 1 Thus far, three buildings of Pthis comPlex have been identified. These consist of OC1/Residence, an aPParent - ly aristocratic household, the furnishings of which attest to the wealth of its inhabitants, OC2/WorkshoP, a large and ornately decorated multifunctional workshoP, and OC3/TriPartite, a building whose triPartite interior division conforms to what we might exPect of a religious structure of the Etruscan seventh century. All stood together on the Plateau by the last quarter of the seventh century BCE. 2 StratigraPhic evidence suggests that the three buildings were destroyed in a sin - gle conflagration. 3 Although the sPecific causes of the fire can not be determined, evi - dence from OC2/WorkshoP suggests a sudden catastroPhe.
    [Show full text]
  • A Near Eastern Ethnic Element Among the Etruscan Elite? Jodi Magness University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    Etruscan Studies Journal of the Etruscan Foundation Volume 8 Article 4 2001 A Near Eastern Ethnic Element Among the Etruscan Elite? Jodi Magness University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/etruscan_studies Recommended Citation Magness, Jodi (2001) "A Near Eastern Ethnic Element Among the Etruscan Elite?," Etruscan Studies: Vol. 8 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/etruscan_studies/vol8/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Etruscan Studies by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Near EasTern EThnic ElemenT Among The ETruscan EliTe? by Jodi Magness INTRODUCTION:THEPROBLEMOFETRUSCANORIGINS 1 “Virtually all archaeologists now agree that the evidence is overwhelmingly in favour of the “indigenous” theory of Etruscan origins: the development of Etruscan culture has to be understood within an evolutionary sequence of social elaboration in Etruria.” 2 “The archaeological evidence now available shows no sign of any invasion, migra- Tion, or colonisaTion in The eighTh cenTury... The formaTion of ETruscan civilisaTion occurred in ITaly by a gradual process, The final sTages of which can be documenTed in The archaeo- logical record from The ninTh To The sevenTh cenTuries BC... For This reason The problem of ETruscan origins is nowadays (righTly) relegaTed To a fooTnoTe in scholarly accounTs.” 3 he origins of the Etruscans have been the subject of debate since classical antiqui- Tty. There have traditionally been three schools of thought (or “models” or “the- ories”) regarding Etruscan origins, based on a combination of textual, archaeo- logical, and linguistic evidence.4 According to the first school of thought, the Etruscans (or Tyrrhenians = Tyrsenoi, Tyrrhenoi) originated in the eastern Mediterranean.
    [Show full text]
  • Epilykos Kalos
    EPILYKOS KALOS (PLATES 63 and 64) N TWO EARLIERPAPERS, the writerattempted to identifymembers of prominent Athenian families in the late 6th century using a combinationof kalos names and os- traka.1 In the second of these studies, it was observed that members of the same family occurredin the work of a single vase painter,2whether praised as kalos or named as partici- pant in a scene of athletics or revelry.3The converse,i.e. that the same individual may be namedon vases by painterswho, on the basis of stylistic affinities,should belong to the same workshop,seems also to be true.4The presentpaper tries to demonstrateboth these proposi- tions by linking membersof another importantfamily, the Philaidai, to a circle of painters on whose vases they appear. The starting point is Epilykos, who is named as kalos 19 times in the years ca. 515- 505, 14 of them on vases by a single painter, Skythes.5Of the other 5, 2 are cups by the Pedieus Painter, whom Beazley considered might in fact be Skythes late in the latter's career;61 is a cup linked to Skythes by Bloesch,7 through the potter work, and through details of draughtsmanship,by Beazley;8 1 is a cup placed by Beazley near the Carpenter Painter;9and the last is a plastic aryballos with janiform women's heads, which gives its name to Beazley's Epilykos Class.10 The close relationshipof Epilykos and Skythesis especiallystriking in view of Skythes' small oeuvre, so that the 14 vases praising Epilykos accountfor fully half his total output.
    [Show full text]
  • Etruscan Winged “Demons”
    First in Flight: Etruscan Winged “Demons” Marvin Morris University of California, Berkeley Classical Civilizations Class of 2016 Abstract: Etruscan winged Underworld figures (commonly referred to as winged “demons”) represent one of the most fascinating and least understood aspects of funerary iconography in ancient Etruria. Their function, along with their origin, has long been the subject of scholarly debates. However, over the last two decades, scholars have begun to take a closer look at these chthonic figures. Recent scholarship has begun to provide answers to many of the most fundamental questions concerning their role, even if disagreements remain over their murky origins. Expanding on interpretations that have cast new light on how these winged (and non winged) Underworld figures functioned, questions concerning Etruscan religious beliefs and funerary ideology can now be reconsidered. Introduction: Iconography and Ideology Etruscan winged Underworld figures (commonly referred to as winged “demons”) represent one of the most fascinating and least understood aspects of funerary iconography in ancient Etruria. Their function, along with their origin, has long been the subject of scholarly debates. However, over the last two decades, scholars1 have begun to take a closer look at these chthonic figures. Recent scholarship has begun to provide answers to many of the most fundamental questions concerning their role, even if disagreements remain over their murky origins2. Expanding on interpretations that have cast new light on how these winged (and non winged) Underworld figures functioned, questions concerning Etruscan religious beliefs and funerary ideology can now be reconsidered. One such question concerns the sudden increase in the appearance of winged “demons” that begins to occur around the end of the fifth century BCE.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bucchero Pesante Column Krater in Iowa
    A BUCCHERO PESANTE COLUMN KRATER IN IOWA (Con le tavv. II-VII f. t.) In 1970 the University of Iowa Museum of Art acquired a large column krater said to have come from Vulci (1). It was presented as part of an exhi- bition of ancient Italian pottery from Midwestern collections in 1971 (2). This article describes the krater and then relates it to other vases of similar type attempting to establish a secure date and provenance. The investigation of parallel examples enables us to determine more specifically the nature of « bucchero pesante » production in the Vulci area and its relationship to Etru- scan pottery manufacture at other sites. Plate II illustrates the vase in its present state (3). Minor breaks along (1) I wish to thank Mr. Ulfert Wilke, Director of the Museum of Art, for per- mission to publish the vase. Special thanks are due Prof. Kyle Μ. Phillips, Jr. of Bryn Mawr College, for reading the manuscript and offering helpful suggestions. Photographs of the Iowa krater are by B. Yarborough; drawings in the text are by the author. Sections of this article appeared in a paper entitled, A Sixth Century Bucchero Pesante Column Krater in Iowa presented by the author at the 73rd Conference of the Archaeolo- gical Institute of America at Cincinnati, 1971. An abstract appears in AJA LXXVI, 1972, p. 208. The manuscript was completed in November, 1972. Funds for photographs were supplied by a stipend from the Graduate College of the University of Iowa. In addition to the St. Etr. standard abbreviations, the following appear in the footnotes: Bartoloni - G.
    [Show full text]
  • ANCIENT TERRACOTTAS from SOUTH ITALY and SICILY in the J
    ANCIENT TERRACOTTAS FROM SOUTH ITALY AND SICILY in the j. paul getty museum The free, online edition of this catalogue, available at http://www.getty.edu/publications/terracottas, includes zoomable high-resolution photography and a select number of 360° rotations; the ability to filter the catalogue by location, typology, and date; and an interactive map drawn from the Ancient World Mapping Center and linked to the Getty’s Thesaurus of Geographic Names and Pleiades. Also available are free PDF, EPUB, and MOBI downloads of the book; CSV and JSON downloads of the object data from the catalogue and the accompanying Guide to the Collection; and JPG and PPT downloads of the main catalogue images. © 2016 J. Paul Getty Trust This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042. First edition, 2016 Last updated, December 19, 2017 https://www.github.com/gettypubs/terracottas Published by the J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles Getty Publications 1200 Getty Center Drive, Suite 500 Los Angeles, California 90049-1682 www.getty.edu/publications Ruth Evans Lane, Benedicte Gilman, and Marina Belozerskaya, Project Editors Robin H. Ray and Mary Christian, Copy Editors Antony Shugaar, Translator Elizabeth Chapin Kahn, Production Stephanie Grimes, Digital Researcher Eric Gardner, Designer & Developer Greg Albers, Project Manager Distributed in the United States and Canada by the University of Chicago Press Distributed outside the United States and Canada by Yale University Press, London Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: J.
    [Show full text]
  • Attic Pottery of the Later Fifth Century from the Athenian Agora
    ATTIC POTTERY OF THE LATER FIFTH CENTURY FROM THE ATHENIAN AGORA (PLATES 73-103) THE 1937 campaign of the American excavations in the Athenian Agora included work on the Kolonos Agoraios. One of the most interesting results was the discovery and clearing of a well 1 whose contents proved to be of considerable value for the study of Attic pottery. For this reason it has seemed desirable to present the material as a whole.2 The well is situated on the southern slopes of the Kolonos. The diameter of the shaft at the mouth is 1.14 metres; it was cleared to the bottom, 17.80 metres below the surface. The modern water-level is 11 metres down. I quote the description from the excavator's notebook: The well-shaft, unusually wide and rather well cut widens towards the bottom to a diameter of ca. 1.50 m. There were great quantities of pot- tery, mostly coarse; this pottery seems to be all of the same period . and joins In addition to the normal abbreviations for periodicals the following are used: A.B.C. A n tiquites du Bosphore Cimmerien. Anz. ArchaiologischerAnzeiger. Deubner Deubner, Attische Feste. FR. Furtwangler-Reichhold, Griechische Vasenmxlerei. Kekule Kekule, Die Reliefs an der Balustrade der Athena Nike. Kraiker Kraiker,Die rotfigurigenattischen Vasen (Collectionof the ArchaeologicalIn- stitute of Heidelberg). Langlotz Langlotz, Griechische Vasen in Wiirzburg. ML. Monumenti Antichi Pu'bblicatiper Cura della Reale Accadenia dei Lincei. Rendiconti Rendiconti della Reale Accademia dei Lincei. Richter and Hall Richter and Hall, Red-Figured Athenian Vases in the Metropolitan Museum of Art.
    [Show full text]