DOCSLIB.ORG

Will the Quants Invade Sand Hill Road? | Venturebeat

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Will the quants invade Sand Hill Road? | VentureBeat http://venturebeat.com/2010/10/21/will-the-quants-invade-sand-... VentureBeat Will the quants invade Sand Hill Road? October 21, 2010 | Alex Salkever 7 Comments Will the quants storm the clubby bastions of the venture capital world? That question has been coming up frequently of late. At the Demo 2010 conference, InLab Ventures rolled out a new venture capital program it dubbed VC3.0 that included elimination of carry fees and incentives for board members to spend time with invested startups. Most importantly, though, the InLab Ventures platform features back-tested screening technology that InLab claims can quickly and accurately identify which startups have a greater chance of success even before initial funding occurs. In other words, InLab says it has a mathematical and statistical model that can predict startup success. Apparently the technology is decent, as InLab general partner Greg Doyle told me that at least one major consulting firm doing research into VC markets has licensed the model for due diligence purposes. If InLab’s magical model works and math can replace that vaunted gut judgment that to date has been a critical criteria for deciding whether to invest in a startup, then why should VCs be using their gut to pick investments at all? (a point raised by VC gadfly Paul Kedrosky). Why not let the quants, the propeller-heads that designed trading models for Wall Street and for other hard-to-value asset classes do the same for Silicon Valley? 1 of 11 10/27/10 4:54 PM Will the quants invade Sand Hill Road? | VentureBeat http://venturebeat.com/2010/10/21/will-the-quants-invade-sand-... InLab is not the only firm challenging this conventional wisdom. We also heard recently about Quid, a Peter Thiel (surprised?) backed startup that is building out new technologies to quantify startup growth and put numbers to what previously had been an opaque market. Quid is looking to track things like job listings, customer wins and funding valuations at first, second, and third funding rounds to give venture investors a better yardstick — and better quantitative tools — in valuing startups. From quantitative yardstick to quant model is no great leap. In fact, Quid is an offshoot of YouNoodle.com, a quasi-community that allowed startups to tout their stuff and look for employees but also offered an intriguing and much-maligned calculator that claimed it could predict the exit or liquidity event valuation of startups. YouNoodle presciently pegged the valuation of formerly hot social applications startup Slide at $124 million, well below paper valuation of $550 million recorded in the startup’s third round of financing. But then Google bought Slide for $182 million in August 2010, an instance where the quant model clearly beat the best brains in Silicon Valley. (Of course, YouNoodle totally whiffed on the exit valuation of TechCrunch. TechCrunch’s Michael Arrington would clearly have loved to have sold for $90 million instead of the reputed $30 million.) Another factor to consider here is the rapid rise of a Palantir Technologies, a startup that amalgamates disparate data sources and places them in an easy-to-access visually configurable context to drive better decision making in disparate fields ranging from health care to warfare to site location of stores. Palantir is a platform that represents the coming wave of super-duper quantification tools. Can you say a quantification tool for venture capital startups? Someone out there is probably writing the algorithm already. No, the quants are not about to take over Sand Hill Road in a mad rush of insanely rosy IRR numbers. This will be a slow, steady process. But aside from the growing number of tools available to create quantitative models for venture success, other pressures are building for the VC biz to make big changes — most particularly, the negative return rate for the latest class of VC funds and the rapid disappearance of LP money from big pension funds and other deep pockets of capital that are likely gone for the forseeable future. Yes, VCs add real value to companies through mentorship, access to networks and potential clients, and, increasingly, provision of non-core services such as PR, marketing, design and the like. Yes, VCs and super angels will continue to be the gatekeepers in what will always be a high-touch process. But just as Wall Street morphed from a good ‘ol boy 2 of 11 10/27/10 4:54 PM Will the quants invade Sand Hill Road? | VentureBeat http://venturebeat.com/2010/10/21/will-the-quants-invade-sand-... network to a place where quants became the alpha dogs, Silicon Valley could well follow steps along that path and perhaps do so much faster than we expect. Sure, relationships and judgment will always be part of VC. But the rise of the automatic VC, where a term sheet is not signed unless the quant model blesses the deal, is a real possibility in the near term. [photo credit: João Trindade] Next Story: Tesla gears up $42 million Fremont factory for Model S Previous Story: Sony says it shipped 1M PlayStation Move units in a month Print Email Twitter Facebook Google Buzz LinkedIn Digg StumbleUpon Reddit Delicious Google More… Tags: VC3.0 Companies: InLab Ventures, Palantir Technologies, Quid, Slide, Younoodle People: Greg Doyle, Peter Thiel 3 of 11 10/27/10 4:54 PM Will the quants invade Sand Hill Road? | VentureBeat http://venturebeat.com/2010/10/21/will-the-quants-invade-sand-... You might like: Paid Is Kleiner Distribution How Hunch’s Zuckerberg: 3 ways to Perkins about CEO just Facebook isn’t raise seed AT&T Offers to announce a slapped a “For making real capital if you SanDisk Facebook Sale” sign on profits, and don’t know 16GB/32GB fund? his company that’s okay any investors microSDHC VentureBeat VentureBeat VentureBeat VentureBeat memory cards MobileBurn. [?] 4 of 11 10/27/10 4:54 PM Will the quants invade Sand Hill Road? | VentureBeat http://venturebeat.com/2010/10/21/will-the-quants-invade-sand-... Showing 7 comments Sort by Oldest first Subscribe by email Subscribe by RSS PeterA650 6 days ago Next time someone tells you they have an algorithm that predicts success ask them to prove it by earning money with it. Like Reply Matt 5 days ago Aren't we at all times surrounded with examples of algorithms that make money? Like Reply NEW Domainers Gate directory 6 days ago now I know that BAs and VCs NEVER invest in really innovative projects but only where they can quickly make LOTS of money! but, despite all their efforts to understand which startups can be successful, over 95% of their ventures NEVER make profits or FAIL Like Reply Jennifer Jones 5 days ago Everything goes in cycles. VCs adding marketing, HR and other services to their firms is what they did in the late 1990s then got rid of them after the crash of 2001. I should know as 5 of 11 10/27/10 4:54 PM Will the quants invade Sand Hill Road? | VentureBeat http://venturebeat.com/2010/10/21/will-the-quants-invade-sand-... i was the first marketing partner for Mayfield Fund in 2000 after working for them all through the 90s as an advisor. Now i work for 5 venture firms as a marketing advisor. The bottom line is that VCs do have to add value to their portfolio today. All of this is good for the entrepreneurs. VCs must help their companies build a better business and that is what will make them stand out. That's the bottom line. 1 person liked this. Like Reply ahsanhilal 5 days ago There is a huge disconnect in this article between what VCs do for startups and what startups actually are. Most startups do not essentially end up exactly how they start, which is to say they change business models quite often and quite rapidly. The whole idea of being an enterpreneur and having a startup is to initialize and iterate and re-iterate, and so on and so forth, until the company comes across a viable business model. Each decision made by the startup can have a drastic affect on the actual future value that the company can possible have. Now, come to think of this in terms of a mathematical model, and the decision analysis/ probabilistic scenarios required to run a model is so complex that you can never ever really understand the true value of the startup through models. That is why Incubators/Angels/VCs often invest in teams who they believe can make the right kind of decisions and iterate favorably when the time comes up to establish a viable and lasting company. Moreover, if these models are based on past scenarios, then there really of very little value since technology startups specially seek to find new markets and new customers, that are really not there. So considering the value of a startup based on what is here and now, is again almost next to impossible due to the true value of the startup lying in a future state of the world and not necessarily the current state. As such, given the nature of startups and the investment methodology required, I do not think it is viable business model PeterA650 liked this Like Reply Healy Jones 5 days ago I doubt that there are enough "numbers" at an early stage startup for hedge fund style quant 6 of 11 10/27/10 4:54 PM Will the quants invade Sand Hill Road? | VentureBeat http://venturebeat.com/2010/10/21/will-the-quants-invade-sand-..
Recommended publications
  • THE TRUTH CAN CATCH the LIE: the FLAWED UNDERSTANDING of ONLINE SPEECH in INRE Anonymous ONLINE SPEAKERS Musetta Durkeet

    THE TRUTH CAN CATCH the LIE: the FLAWED UNDERSTANDING of ONLINE SPEECH in INRE Anonymous ONLINE SPEAKERS Musetta Durkeet

    THE TRUTH CAN CATCH THE LIE: THE FLAWED UNDERSTANDING OF ONLINE SPEECH IN INRE ANoNYMous ONLINE SPEAKERS Musetta Durkeet In the early years of the Internet, many cases seeking disclosure of anonymous online speakers involved large companies seeking to unveil identities of anonymous posters criticizing the companies on online financial message boards.' In such situations, Internet service providers (ISPs)-or, less often, online service providers (OSPs)2-- disclosed individually- identifying information, often without providing defendants notice of this disclosure,' and judges showed hostility towards defendants' motions to quash.4 Often these subpoenas were issued by parties alleging various civil causes of action, including defamation and tortious interference with business contracts.s These cases occurred in a time when courts and the general public alike pictured the Internet as a wild west-like "frontier society,"' devoid of governing norms, where anonymous personalities ran C 2011 Musetta Durkee. t J.D. Candidate, 2012, University of California, Berkeley School of Law. 1. Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky, Anonymity in Cyberspace: What Can We LearnfromJohn Doe?, 50 B.C. L. REv. 1373, 1373-74 (2009). 2. As will be discussed below, there has been some conflation of two separate services that allow users to access the Internet, on the one hand, and engage in various activities, speech, and communication, on the other. Most basically, this Note distinguishes between Internet Service Providers (JSPs) and Online Service Providers (OSPs) in order to separate those services and companies involved with providing subscribers access to the infrastructure of the Internet (ISPs, and their subscribers) and those services and companies involved with providing users with online applications, services, platforms, and spaces on the Internet (OSPs and their users).
  • Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration

    Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration

    Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 2131 Sand Hill Road Office Project March 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms and Abbreviations……………………………………………………...………………………………………..v Section 1.0 Introduction and Purpose ................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose of The Initial Study ................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Public Review Period ............................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Consideration of the Initial Study and Project ........................................................................ 1 1.4 Notice of Determination ......................................................................................................... 1 Section 2.0 Project Information ......................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Project Title ............................................................................................................................ 3 2.2 Lead Agency Contact ............................................................................................................. 3 2.3 Project Applicant .................................................................................................................... 3 2.4 Project Location ...................................................................................................................... 3 2.5 Assessor’s
  • (SB #097802) Dpetrocelli@Omm.C

    (SB #097802) [email protected]

    Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 12/04/2020 09:16 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Mariscal,Deputy Clerk 20SMCV01866 Assigned for all purposes to: Santa Monica Courthouse, Judicial Officer: H. Ford III 1 DANIEL M. PETROCELLI (S.B. #097802) [email protected] 2 MOLLY M. LENS (S.B. #283867) [email protected] 3 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 1999 Avenue of the Stars, 8th Floor 4 Los Angeles, CA 90067-6035 Telephone: (310) 553-6700 5 Facsimile: (310) 246-6779 6 ERIC AMDURSKY (S.B. #180288) [email protected] 7 O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 2765 Sand Hill Road 8 Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: (650) 473-2600 9 Facsimile: (650) 473-2601 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. 11 12 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 13 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, WEST DISTRICT 14 ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC., a Delaware Case No. Corporation, 15 Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR: 16 vs. (1) Intentional Interference with 17 Contract; NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and 18 DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, (2) Unfair Competition – Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ Code 17200 et seq.; and 19 Defendants. (3) Aiding and Abetting Breach of 20 Fiduciary Duty 21 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COMPLAINT 1 Plaintiff Activision Blizzard, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Activision”), for its complaint against 2 Netflix, Inc. (“Netflix” or “Defendant”), alleges on knowledge as to itself and its own acts, and on 3 information and belief as to all other matters, as follows: 4 NATURE OF ACTION 5 1.
  • Social Media Why You Should Care What Is Social Media? Social Network

    Social Media Why You Should Care What Is Social Media? Social Network

    Social Media Why You Should Care IST 331 - Olivier Georgeon, Frank Ritter 31 oct 15 • eMarketer (2007) estimated by 2011 one-half Examples of all Internet users will use social networking • Facebook regulary. • YouTube • By 2015, 75% use • Myspace • Twitter • Del.icio.us • Digg • Etc… 2 What is Social Media? Social Network • Social Network • Online communities of people who share • User Generated Content (UGC) interests and activities, • Social Bookmarking • … or who are interested in exploring the interests and activities of others. • Examples: Facebook, MySpace, LinkedIn, Orkut • Falls to analysis with tools in Ch. 9 3 4 User Generated Content (UGC) Social Bookmarking • A method for Internet users to store, organize, search, • or Consumer Generated Media (CGM) and manage bookmarks of web pages on the Internet with the help of metadata. • Based on communities; • Defined: Media content that is publicly – The more people who bookmark a piece of content, the more available and produced by end-users (user). value it is determined to have. • Examples: Digg, Del.icio.us, StumbleUpon, and reddit….and now combinations • Usually supported by a social network • Examples: Blogs, Micro-blogs, YouTube video, Flickr photos, Wiki content, Facebook wall posts, reddit, Second Life… 5 6 Social Media Principles Generate an activity stream • Automatic • Who you are – Google History, Google Analytics – Personalization • Blog • Who you know • Micro-blog – Browse network – Twitter, yammer, identi.ca • What you do • Mailing groups – Generate an activity stream
  • Class Action Complaint

    Class Action Complaint

    1 Laurence M. Rosen, Esq. (SBN 219683) THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. 2 FI fL tE B 355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2450 . AN MATEO COUNTY Los Angeles, CA 90071 3 Telephone: (213) 785-2610 4 Facsimile: (213) 226-4684 Email: [email protected] 5 SARRAF GENTILE LLP 6 Ronen Sarraf . Joseph Gentile 7 14 Bond Street, Suite 212 8 Great Neck, New York (516) 699-8890 9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 10 11 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 12 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 18 e , v8 2 2 ~ 8 m 13 ~----------- OHNNY HOSEY and GEORGE SHILLIARE, ) Case No.: _______ -< 14 ndividually and on behalf of all others similarly ) 'T1 ituated, ) )> 15 ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT )< Plaintiffs, ) 16 ) s. ) 17 I I ) RICHARD 9,osTOLO, MIKE.,,PUPTA, LUCA ) DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 18 BARATTA, JACK DORSEY, BETER ) CHERNIN, :PETER CURRIE(I>ETER" ) 19 FENTON,1)AVIDROSENBLATT:'EVAN / ) ) 20 WJLLIAMS, GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO., -'/ ) MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LkC, J.P. 1/ I ) 21 MORGAN SECURITIES LLC,"TWITTER, ) /1~-CIV0;228 ... INC., MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER ) I CMP i Complaint Filed 22 & SMITH INCORPORATElt), DEUTSCHE ) BANK SECURITIES INC./ALLEN & ) 23 COMPANY LLC, and CODE ADVISORS LLC, ) ) ; 1i1111111111111111111rnm1 ~ 24 ) 25 26 27 28 COMPLAINT Plaintiffs Johnny Hosey ("Hosey") and George Shilliare ("Shilliare")( collectively 2 "Plaintiffs") make the following allegations, individually and on behalf of all others similarly 3 situated, based upon the investigation by Plaintiffs' counsel, which included among other things, an 4 analysis of publicly available news articles, reports, corporate webcasts with analysts, public filings 5 made with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), and securities analysts' reports about 6 Twitter, Inc.
  • Network Overlap and Content Sharing on Social Media Platforms

    Network Overlap and Content Sharing on Social Media Platforms

    Network Overlap and Content Sharing on Social Media Platforms Jing Peng1, Ashish Agarwal2, Kartik Hosanagar3, Raghuram Iyengar3 1School of Business, University of Connecticut 2McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin 3The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania [email protected] [email protected] {kartikh, riyengar}@wharton.upenn.edu February 15, 2017 Acknowledgments. We benefited from feedback from session participants at 2013 Symposium on Statistical Challenges in eCommerce Research, 2014 International Conference on Information Systems, 2015 Workshop on Information in Networks, 2015 INFORMS Annual Meeting, and 2015 Workshop on Information Systems and Economics. The authors would like to thank Professors Christophe Van den Bulte, Paul Shaman, and Dylan Small for helpful discussions. This project was made possible by financial support extended to the first author through Mack Institute Research Fellowship, President Gutmann's Leadership Award, and Baker Retailing Center PhD Research Grant. 1 Network Overlap and Content Sharing on Social Media Platforms ABSTRACT We study the impact of network overlap – the overlap in network connections between two users – on content sharing in directed social media platforms. We propose a hazards model that flexibly captures the impact of three different measures of network overlap (i.e., common followees, common followers and common mutual followers) on content sharing. Our results indicate a receiver is more likely to share content from a sender with whom they share more common followees, common followers or common mutual followers after accounting for other measures. Additionally, the effect of common followers and common mutual followers is positive when the content is novel but decreases, and may even become negative, when many others in the network have already adopted it.
  • Transportation Master Plan Oversight and Outreach Committee

    Transportation Master Plan Oversight and Outreach Committee

    AGENDA ITEM D-1 Transportation Master Plan Oversight and Outreach Committee SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES - DRAFT Date: 8/30/2018 Time: 6:30 p.m. Belle Haven School 415 Ivy Dr., Menlo Park, CA 94025 Meeting notes taken by the consultant team are attached to these minutes (Attachment). A. Call to Order Oversight and Outreach Committee (Committee) Co-Chair Keith called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m. B. Roll Call Present: Diane Bailey (late arrival), Andrew Barnes, Chris DeCardy (late arrival), Kirsten Keith, Adina Levin (late arrival), Henry Riggs, Sarah Staley Shenk, Katherine Strehl, Jen Wolosin Absent: Catherine Carlton, Jacqueline Cebrian City Staff: Kristiann Choy, Kevin Chen, Alex Skoch Consultant Staff: Mark Spencer, Nick Bleich, Andre Huff, Jeff Knowles, Katharine Pan, Kacy Wilson, Katie DeLeuw C. Public Comment • Pamela Jones requested that the Transportation Management Plan (TMP) be connected to the Belle Haven Traffic Calming Plan. D. Regular Business D1. Approve the Oversight and Outreach Committee meeting minutes of May 30, 2018 The Committee discussed converting to summary minutes. ACTION: Motion and second (Wolosin/Barnes) to approve the Oversight and Outreach Committee meeting minutes of May 30, 2018. The motion passed (3-2-1-5; Strehl/Shenk abstained, Riggs dissented, Bailey/Carlton/Cebrian/DeCardy/Levin absent,). D2. Present project overview and introduce open house meeting format Committee members Bailey/DeCardy/Levin arrived during agenda item D2. • Sheryl Bims commented that the Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) should be related to the location of development and the improvements funded by the program. Bims also spoke on traffic calming measures to be included in the TMP and the need for the Safe Routes to School program to include the Belle Haven neighborhood.
  • Facebook Timeline

    Facebook Timeline

    Facebook Timeline 2003 October • Mark Zuckerberg releases Facemash, the predecessor to Facebook. It was described as a Harvard University version of Hot or Not. 2004 January • Zuckerberg begins writing Facebook. • Zuckerberg registers thefacebook.com domain. February • Zuckerberg launches Facebook on February 4. 650 Harvard students joined thefacebook.com in the first week of launch. March • Facebook expands to MIT, Boston University, Boston College, Northeastern University, Stanford University, Dartmouth College, Columbia University, and Yale University. April • Zuckerberg, Dustin Moskovitz, and Eduardo Saverin form Thefacebook.com LLC, a partnership. June • Facebook receives its first investment from PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel for US$500,000. • Facebook incorporates into a new company, and Napster co-founder Sean Parker becomes its president. • Facebook moves its base of operations to Palo Alto, California. N. Lee, Facebook Nation, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5308-6, 211 Ó Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013 212 Facebook Timeline August • To compete with growing campus-only service i2hub, Zuckerberg launches Wirehog. It is a precursor to Facebook Platform applications. September • ConnectU files a lawsuit against Zuckerberg and other Facebook founders, resulting in a $65 million settlement. October • Maurice Werdegar of WTI Partner provides Facebook a $300,000 three-year credit line. December • Facebook achieves its one millionth registered user. 2005 February • Maurice Werdegar of WTI Partner provides Facebook a second $300,000 credit line and a $25,000 equity investment. April • Venture capital firm Accel Partners invests $12.7 million into Facebook. Accel’s partner and President Jim Breyer also puts up $1 million of his own money.
  • TRIPLEPOINT VENTURE GROWTH BDC CORP. 2755 Sand Hill Road, Suite 150 Menlo Park, California 94025 (650) 854-2090

    TRIPLEPOINT VENTURE GROWTH BDC CORP. 2755 Sand Hill Road, Suite 150 Menlo Park, California 94025 (650) 854-2090

    TRIPLEPOINT VENTURE GROWTH BDC CORP. 2755 Sand Hill Road, Suite 150 Menlo Park, California 94025 (650) 854-2090 April 6, 2020 Dear Stockholder: You are cordially invited to attend the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp., a Maryland corporation (the “Company,” “TPVG,” “we,” “us” or “our”), to be held electronically via live webcast on Friday, May 1, 2020 at 10:30 a.m., Pacific Time. The live webcast will be accessible over the internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TPVG2020. The notice of the Annual Meeting and the proxy statement accompanying this letter provide an outline of the business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting. At the Annual Meeting, you will be asked to: (1) elect two directors of the Company; (2) ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020; and (3) to transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting, or any postponement or adjournment thereof. You have the right to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting if you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on April 6, 2020. It is very important that your shares be represented at the Annual Meeting. Even if you plan to attend the meeting electronically via the live webcast, we urge you to complete, date and sign the enclosed proxy card and promptly return it in the envelope provided. If you prefer, you can save time by authorizing your proxy through the Internet at www.proxyvote.com or by telephone as described in the proxy statement and on the enclosed proxy card.
  • A Case Study of the Reddit Community

    A Case Study of the Reddit Community

    An Exploration of Discussion Threads in Social News Sites: A Case Study of the Reddit Community Tim Weninger Xihao Avi Zhu Jiawei Han Department of Computer Science University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Urbana, Illinois 61801 Email: fweninge1, zhu40, [email protected] Abstract—Social news and content aggregation Web sites have submission. These comment threads provide a user-generated become massive repositories of valuable knowledge on a diverse and user-curated commentary on the topic at hand. Unlike range of topics. Millions of Web-users are able to leverage these message board or Facebook-style comments that list comments platforms to submit, view and discuss nearly anything. The users in a flat, chronological order, or Twitter discussions that are themselves exclusively curate the content with an intricate system person-to-person and oftentimes difficult to discern, comment of submissions, voting and discussion. Furthermore, the data on threads in the social news paradigm are permanent (although social news Web sites is extremely well organized by its user-base, which opens the door for opportunities to leverage this data for editable), well-formed and hierarchical. The hierarchical nature other purposes just like Wikipedia data has been used for many of comment threads, where the discussion structure resembles other purposes. In this paper we study a popular social news a tree, is especially important because this allows divergent Web site called Reddit. Our investigation looks at the dynamics sub-topics resulting in a more robust overall discussion. of its discussion threads, and asks two main questions: (1) to In this paper we explore the social news site Reddit in order what extent do discussion threads resemble a topical hierarchy? and (2) Can discussion threads be used to enhance Web search? to gain a deeper understanding on the social, temporal, and We show interesting results for these questions on a very large topical methods that allow these types of user-powered Web snapshot several sub-communities of the Reddit Web site.
  • Zach Christopherson PHIL 308 Term Paper March 22, 2009

    Zach Christopherson PHIL 308 Term Paper March 22, 2009

    Zach Christopherson PHIL 308 Term Paper March 22, 2009 Online Communities and the Ethics of Revolt With the creation and widespread use of the Internet in the 1980s came Internet communities. They were originally started in newsgroups, message boards, and Internet forums. A regular group of members would consistently post and exchange ideas and information with one another. Relationships were formed and these communities became permanent entities, usually remaining on the sites where they were created. From time to time a community’s home becomes threatened. This can occur when a site is taken down by the owners, the site becomes obsolete and is replaced by a competitor, or the community migrates to a new home for reasons like censorship or discrimination. Some of the largest online communities exist on message board sites such as GenMay.com (General Mayhem), LiveJournal.com, and 4chan.org. These members share common likes and dislikes which bring them together for general socialization. Over the span of a community’s life differences can arise between the site administrators and the site community that can cause a revolt by the community against the website on which it was created. One of the most popular social news websites on the Internet is Digg.com, which was launched on December 4, 2004 and has housed a strong Internet community since then. The purpose of Digg is to compile many user-submitted news stories and have the community either rate them up (Digg them) or rate them down (Bury them). These ratings are stored on the site and a running counter is shown to the left of the news article title.
  • PANAHI-.Pdf (1.237Mb)

    PANAHI-.Pdf (1.237Mb)

    © Copyright by Hesam Panahi, 2010 USER-GENERATED CONTENT AND REVOLUTIONS: TOWARDS A THEORIZATION OF WEB 2.0 A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the C.T. Bauer College of Business University of Houston In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By Hesam Panahi December, 2010 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 Dissertationʼs Research Objective ..................................................................... 2 Dissertationʼs Research Methodology ................................................................ 3 References ......................................................................................................... 5 Paper One: A Critical Study of Social Computing and Web 2.0: The Case of Digg ............................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 7 Theoretical Background ..................................................................................... 9 Critical Studies of IS ....................................................................................... 9 A Critical Framework for Studying Social Computing ................................... 10 Research Methods ........................................................................................... 15 Why an Interpretive Approach .....................................................................