DOCSLIB.ORG

Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 2131 Sand Hill Road Office Project March 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms and Abbreviations……………………………………………………...………………………………………..v Section 1.0 Introduction and Purpose ................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose of The Initial Study ................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Public Review Period ............................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Consideration of the Initial Study and Project ........................................................................ 1 1.4 Notice of Determination ......................................................................................................... 1 Section 2.0 Project Information ......................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Project Title ............................................................................................................................ 3 2.2 Lead Agency Contact ............................................................................................................. 3 2.3 Project Applicant .................................................................................................................... 3 2.4 Project Location ...................................................................................................................... 3 2.5 Assessor’s Parcel Numbers ..................................................................................................... 3 2.6 General Plan Designation and Zoning District ..................................................................... 11 2.7 Project-Related Approvals, Agreements, and Permits.......................................................... 11 Section 3.0 Project Description ........................................................................................................ 13 3.1 Existing Site Conditions ....................................................................................................... 13 3.2 Proposed Project ................................................................................................................... 13 3.3 Uses of the Initial Study ....................................................................................................... 25 Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist and Impact Discussion ......................................................... 27 4.1 Aesthetics .............................................................................................................................. 29 4.2 Agricultural and Forestry Resources .................................................................................... 45 4.3 Air Quality ............................................................................................................................ 47 4.4 Biological Resources ............................................................................................................ 62 4.5 Cultural Resources ................................................................................................................ 70 4.6 Geology and Soils ................................................................................................................. 74 4.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................................................... 81 4.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ........................................................................................ 87 4.9 Hydrology and Water Quality .............................................................................................. 95 4.10 Land Use and Planning ....................................................................................................... 104 4.11 Mineral Resources .............................................................................................................. 115 4.12 Noise and Vibration ............................................................................................................ 117 4.13 Population and Housing ...................................................................................................... 128 4.14 Public Services ................................................................................................................... 130 2131 Sand Hill Road Office i Initial Study City of Menlo Park March 2017 4.15 Recreation ........................................................................................................................... 134 4.16 Transportation/Traffic......................................................................................................... 136 4.17 Utilities and Service Systems ............................................................................................. 155 4.18 Mandatory Findings of Significance .................................................................................. 160 4.19 Summary Table of Impacts and Mitigation Measures ........................................................ 163 Section 5.0 References ................................................................................................................... 175 Section 6.0 Lead Agency and Consultants ..................................................................................... 179 6.1 Lead Agency ....................................................................................................................... 179 6.2 Consultants ......................................................................................................................... 179 Section 7.0 Mitigated Negative Declaration .................................................................................. 181 2131 Sand Hill Road Office ii Initial Study City of Menlo Park March 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Figures Figure 1: Regional Map ........................................................................................................................ 5 Figure 2: Vicinity Map .......................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 3: Aerial Photograph and Surrounding Land Uses .................................................................... 9 Figure 4: City Boundary Map ............................................................................................................. 13 Figure 5: Conceptual Site Plan............................................................................................................ 19 Figure 6: Front and Left Building Elevations ..................................................................................... 21 Figure 7: Rear and Right Building Elevations .................................................................................... 23 Figure 8: Artistic Rendering of Building from Sand Hill Road .......................................................... 33 Figure 9: Sensitive Receptor Locations .............................................................................................. 57 Figure 10: Existing and Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations ......................................... 107 Figure 11: Existing and Proposed Zoning Districts .......................................................................... 111 Figure 12: Intersections and Bicycle Facilities ................................................................................. 139 Photographs Photos 1 – 2 .......................................................................................................................................... 33 Photos 3 – 4 .......................................................................................................................................... 35 Photos 5 – 6 .......................................................................................................................................... 37 Photos 7 – 12 ........................................................................................................................................ 39 Tables Table 2.6-1: General Plan and Zoning ................................................................................................ 11 Table 4.3-1: Air Quality Significance Thresholds .............................................................................. 52 Table 4.3-2: 2010 Clean Air Plan Applicable Control Measures ....................................................... 53 Table 4.3-3: Unmitigated Construction Project Impacts..................................................................... 59 Table 4.3-4: Cumulative Construction Impact Assessment ................................................................ 60 Table 4.4-1: Tree Species Found on Site ............................................................................................ 65 Table 4.12-1: Estimated Construction Noise Levels at Nearby Land Uses ...................................... 125 Table 4.16-1: Signalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions Based on Control Delay ......... 143 Table 4.16-2: Existing Levels of Service .......................................................................................... 145 Table 4.16-3: Project Trip Generation Estimates .............................................................................. 148 Table 4.16-4: Near-Term Levels of Service ....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (SB #097802) [email protected]
    Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 12/04/2020 09:16 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Mariscal,Deputy Clerk 20SMCV01866 Assigned for all purposes to: Santa Monica Courthouse, Judicial Officer: H. Ford III 1 DANIEL M. PETROCELLI (S.B. #097802) [email protected] 2 MOLLY M. LENS (S.B. #283867) [email protected] 3 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 1999 Avenue of the Stars, 8th Floor 4 Los Angeles, CA 90067-6035 Telephone: (310) 553-6700 5 Facsimile: (310) 246-6779 6 ERIC AMDURSKY (S.B. #180288) [email protected] 7 O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 2765 Sand Hill Road 8 Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: (650) 473-2600 9 Facsimile: (650) 473-2601 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. 11 12 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 13 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, WEST DISTRICT 14 ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC., a Delaware Case No. Corporation, 15 Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR: 16 vs. (1) Intentional Interference with 17 Contract; NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and 18 DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, (2) Unfair Competition – Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ Code 17200 et seq.; and 19 Defendants. (3) Aiding and Abetting Breach of 20 Fiduciary Duty 21 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COMPLAINT 1 Plaintiff Activision Blizzard, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Activision”), for its complaint against 2 Netflix, Inc. (“Netflix” or “Defendant”), alleges on knowledge as to itself and its own acts, and on 3 information and belief as to all other matters, as follows: 4 NATURE OF ACTION 5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Class Action Complaint
    1 Laurence M. Rosen, Esq. (SBN 219683) THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. 2 FI fL tE B 355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2450 . AN MATEO COUNTY Los Angeles, CA 90071 3 Telephone: (213) 785-2610 4 Facsimile: (213) 226-4684 Email: [email protected] 5 SARRAF GENTILE LLP 6 Ronen Sarraf . Joseph Gentile 7 14 Bond Street, Suite 212 8 Great Neck, New York (516) 699-8890 9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 10 11 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 12 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 18 e , v8 2 2 ~ 8 m 13 ~----------- OHNNY HOSEY and GEORGE SHILLIARE, ) Case No.: _______ -< 14 ndividually and on behalf of all others similarly ) 'T1 ituated, ) )> 15 ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT )< Plaintiffs, ) 16 ) s. ) 17 I I ) RICHARD 9,osTOLO, MIKE.,,PUPTA, LUCA ) DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 18 BARATTA, JACK DORSEY, BETER ) CHERNIN, :PETER CURRIE(I>ETER" ) 19 FENTON,1)AVIDROSENBLATT:'EVAN / ) ) 20 WJLLIAMS, GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO., -'/ ) MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LkC, J.P. 1/ I ) 21 MORGAN SECURITIES LLC,"TWITTER, ) /1~-CIV0;228 ... INC., MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER ) I CMP i Complaint Filed 22 & SMITH INCORPORATElt), DEUTSCHE ) BANK SECURITIES INC./ALLEN & ) 23 COMPANY LLC, and CODE ADVISORS LLC, ) ) ; 1i1111111111111111111rnm1 ~ 24 ) 25 26 27 28 COMPLAINT Plaintiffs Johnny Hosey ("Hosey") and George Shilliare ("Shilliare")( collectively 2 "Plaintiffs") make the following allegations, individually and on behalf of all others similarly 3 situated, based upon the investigation by Plaintiffs' counsel, which included among other things, an 4 analysis of publicly available news articles, reports, corporate webcasts with analysts, public filings 5 made with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), and securities analysts' reports about 6 Twitter, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Master Plan Oversight and Outreach Committee
    AGENDA ITEM D-1 Transportation Master Plan Oversight and Outreach Committee SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES - DRAFT Date: 8/30/2018 Time: 6:30 p.m. Belle Haven School 415 Ivy Dr., Menlo Park, CA 94025 Meeting notes taken by the consultant team are attached to these minutes (Attachment). A. Call to Order Oversight and Outreach Committee (Committee) Co-Chair Keith called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m. B. Roll Call Present: Diane Bailey (late arrival), Andrew Barnes, Chris DeCardy (late arrival), Kirsten Keith, Adina Levin (late arrival), Henry Riggs, Sarah Staley Shenk, Katherine Strehl, Jen Wolosin Absent: Catherine Carlton, Jacqueline Cebrian City Staff: Kristiann Choy, Kevin Chen, Alex Skoch Consultant Staff: Mark Spencer, Nick Bleich, Andre Huff, Jeff Knowles, Katharine Pan, Kacy Wilson, Katie DeLeuw C. Public Comment • Pamela Jones requested that the Transportation Management Plan (TMP) be connected to the Belle Haven Traffic Calming Plan. D. Regular Business D1. Approve the Oversight and Outreach Committee meeting minutes of May 30, 2018 The Committee discussed converting to summary minutes. ACTION: Motion and second (Wolosin/Barnes) to approve the Oversight and Outreach Committee meeting minutes of May 30, 2018. The motion passed (3-2-1-5; Strehl/Shenk abstained, Riggs dissented, Bailey/Carlton/Cebrian/DeCardy/Levin absent,). D2. Present project overview and introduce open house meeting format Committee members Bailey/DeCardy/Levin arrived during agenda item D2. • Sheryl Bims commented that the Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) should be related to the location of development and the improvements funded by the program. Bims also spoke on traffic calming measures to be included in the TMP and the need for the Safe Routes to School program to include the Belle Haven neighborhood.
    [Show full text]
  • TRIPLEPOINT VENTURE GROWTH BDC CORP. 2755 Sand Hill Road, Suite 150 Menlo Park, California 94025 (650) 854-2090
    TRIPLEPOINT VENTURE GROWTH BDC CORP. 2755 Sand Hill Road, Suite 150 Menlo Park, California 94025 (650) 854-2090 April 6, 2020 Dear Stockholder: You are cordially invited to attend the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp., a Maryland corporation (the “Company,” “TPVG,” “we,” “us” or “our”), to be held electronically via live webcast on Friday, May 1, 2020 at 10:30 a.m., Pacific Time. The live webcast will be accessible over the internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TPVG2020. The notice of the Annual Meeting and the proxy statement accompanying this letter provide an outline of the business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting. At the Annual Meeting, you will be asked to: (1) elect two directors of the Company; (2) ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020; and (3) to transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting, or any postponement or adjournment thereof. You have the right to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting if you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on April 6, 2020. It is very important that your shares be represented at the Annual Meeting. Even if you plan to attend the meeting electronically via the live webcast, we urge you to complete, date and sign the enclosed proxy card and promptly return it in the envelope provided. If you prefer, you can save time by authorizing your proxy through the Internet at www.proxyvote.com or by telephone as described in the proxy statement and on the enclosed proxy card.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation and Traffic
    4.13 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC This chapter describes the existing traffic conditions of the EA Study Area and evaluates the potential envi- ronmental consequences of future development that could occur by adopting and implementing the pro- posed Housing Element Update, General Plan Consistency Update, and associated Zoning Ordinances amendments, together referred to as the “Plan Components” on transportation and traffic. A summary of the relevant regulatory setting and existing conditions is followed by a discussion of Plan Components and cumulative impacts. The chapter is based on the traffic analysis prepared by TJKM Transportation Consultants dated March 8, 2013, herein referred to as “Traffic Study.” The future baseline traffic volumes have been developed from output of the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG) travel demand model run by the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA). The travel demand associated with the Plan Components have been obtained from the C/CAG Model based upon the anticipated future land uses that have been developed resulting from the land use controls under Near-Term 2014 and 2035 condi- tions. The complete Traffic Study and technical appendices are included in Appendix F of this EA. A. Regulatory Framework 1. Federal Laws and Regulations a. Federal Highway Administration The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is the agency of the United States (U.S.) Department of Transportation (DOT) responsible for the federally-funded roadway system, including the interstate high- way network and portions of the primary State highway network, such as Interstate 280 (I-280). b. Americans with Disabilities Act The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 provides comprehensive rights and protections to indi- viduals with disabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Will the Quants Invade Sand Hill Road? | Venturebeat
    Will the quants invade Sand Hill Road? | VentureBeat http://venturebeat.com/2010/10/21/will-the-quants-invade-sand-... VentureBeat Will the quants invade Sand Hill Road? October 21, 2010 | Alex Salkever 7 Comments Will the quants storm the clubby bastions of the venture capital world? That question has been coming up frequently of late. At the Demo 2010 conference, InLab Ventures rolled out a new venture capital program it dubbed VC3.0 that included elimination of carry fees and incentives for board members to spend time with invested startups. Most importantly, though, the InLab Ventures platform features back-tested screening technology that InLab claims can quickly and accurately identify which startups have a greater chance of success even before initial funding occurs. In other words, InLab says it has a mathematical and statistical model that can predict startup success. Apparently the technology is decent, as InLab general partner Greg Doyle told me that at least one major consulting firm doing research into VC markets has licensed the model for due diligence purposes. If InLab’s magical model works and math can replace that vaunted gut judgment that to date has been a critical criteria for deciding whether to invest in a startup, then why should VCs be using their gut to pick investments at all? (a point raised by VC gadfly Paul Kedrosky). Why not let the quants, the propeller-heads that designed trading models for Wall Street and for other hard-to-value asset classes do the same for Silicon Valley? 1 of 11 10/27/10 4:54 PM Will the quants invade Sand Hill Road? | VentureBeat http://venturebeat.com/2010/10/21/will-the-quants-invade-sand-..
    [Show full text]
  • 4.9 Land Use and Planning
    CONNECTMENLO: GENERAL PLAN LAND US E & CIRCULATION ELEM E N T S A N D M - 2 AREA ZONING UPDATE CITY OF MENLO PARK LAND USE AND PLANNING 4.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING This chapter describes the existing land use character in the City of Menlo Park and evaluates the potential environmental impacts from future development that could occur by adopting and implementing the proposed project described in Chapter 3, Project Description, of this Draft EIR. 4.9.1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 4.9.1.1 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK This section describes existing regional and local regulations and plans that pertain to land use in Menlo Park. There are no federal regulations applicable to the proposed project in this chapter. State Regulations Cortese-Knox Act The Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 20001 establishes a Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) in each county in California, and authorizes these commissions to review, approve, or deny proposals for boundary changes and incorporations for cities, counties, and special districts. The LAFCo establishes a “sphere of influence” (SOI) for cities within their jurisdiction that describes the city's probable future physical boundaries and service area. The Menlo Park SOI is regulated by the San Mateo County LAFCo. The Menlo Park SOI is shown on Figure 3-4 in Chapter 3, Project Description, of this Draft EIR. Senate Bill 375 In order to aid in reaching the goals set by Assembly Bill (AB) 32, Senate Bill (SB) 375 directs the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to set regional targets for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from cars and light trucks.
    [Show full text]
  • DRIVING to CAMPUS: from Highway 101 North & South: Take The
    DRIVING TO CAMPUS: From Highway 101 North & South: Take the Embarcadero Road exit west toward Stanford. At El Camino Real, Embarcadero turns into Galvez Street as it enters the university. Turn right onto Campus Drive, and follow it around to Panama Street. Turn left onto Panama Street. There will be an open parking lot on your right, and a parking structure on your left. You may park in either location. The Durand Building is to the left at the end of Panama Street as it curves around and becomes Samuel Morris Way. From Highway 280 North & South: Exit 280 at Sand Hill Road, heading east. Make a right turn on Santa Cruz Avenue, then a left turn onto Junipero Serra Boulevard. Turn right at the third stoplight, Campus Drive West. Continue around Campus Drive West and turn right when you reach Panama Street. There will be an open parking lot on your right, and a parking structure on your left. You may park in either location. The Durand Building is to the left at the end of Panama Street as it curves around and becomes Samuel Morris Way. From El Camino Real: Exit El Camino Real at University Avenue. Turn toward the hills (away from the center of Palo Alto). As you enter Stanford, University Avenue becomes Palm Drive. Go through one traffic light, and turn right onto Campus Drive. Turn left onto Panama Street. There will be an open parking lot on your right, and a parking structure on your left. You may park in either location. The Durand Building is to the left at the end of Panama Street as it curves around and becomes Samuel Morris Way.
    [Show full text]
  • Cert Petition
    No. 20-____ IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ____________________ FACEBOOK, INC., Petitioner, v. PERRIN AIKENS DAVIS ET AL., Respondents. ____________________ On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ____________________ PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI ____________________ Michael R. Dreeben Jeffrey L. Fisher Ephraim McDowell Counsel of Record O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 1625 Eye Street, N.W. 2765 Sand Hill Road Washington, D.C. 20006 Menlo Park, CA 94025 (202) 383-5300 (650) 473-2633 [email protected] Yaira Dubin O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP Times Square Tower 7 Times Square New York, N.Y. 10036 (212) 326-2000 i QUESTION PRESENTED The Wiretap Act prohibits the “intentional[] inter- cept[ion]” of an “electronic communication,” but pre- cludes liability for a “party to [a] communication” or when a party consents to the interception. 18 U.S.C. § 2511(1), (2)(d). Internet webpages are frequently composed of content—images and text—sent from multiple providers according to instructions commu- nicated by a user’s web browser to obtain that con- tent. The question presented is: Whether an internet content provider violates the Wiretap Act where a computer user’s web browser in- structs the provider to display content on the webpage the user visits. ii PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING Facebook, Inc. is Petitioner here and was Defend- ant-Appellee below. Perrin Aikens Davis, Brian K. Lentz, Cynthia D. Quinn, and Matthew J. Vickery are Respondents here and were Plaintiffs-Appellants below. iii CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Facebook, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Menlo Park Council Election: Early Results Show Wolosin in Lead
    THE HOMETOWN NEWSPAPER FOR MENLO PARK, ATHERTON, PORTOLA VALLEY AND WOODSIDE NOVEMBER 6, 2020 | VOL. 56 NO. 9 WWW.ALMANACNEWS.COM Menlo Park council election: Early results show Wolosin in lead By Kate Bradshaw project manager at Cisco; and Almanac Staff Writer Fennell, 33, a Black professional triathlete and entrepreneur who enlo Park’s first official owns Fenn Coffee. District 3 City Council District 3 includes a section of Mmember could be safe Menlo Park bounded between routes advocate Jen Wolosin. As Palo Alto and Atherton, stretch- of the most recent election results ing southwest to Crane Street available the morning of Nov. 4, and northeast to the VA prop- candidate Wolosin had received erty off of Willow Road. It the most votes at 1,266 or 59.8% includes the Civic Center, the of those count- Caltrain station and the neigh- ed so far. Chel- borhoods of Vintage Oaks, Lin- sea Nguyen had field Oaks and Felton Gables, 543 votes or among other areas. 25.7%, and Max On election night, Wolosin Fennell had said she was excited about the 306 or 14.5%. early results. “It’s really gratify- Go to is.gd/ ing and I am excited to get to smcresults to Jen Wolosin work for the residents of Menlo access the latest Park.” results. She added that she was proud The three of the work of her campaign candidates team, which adapted to the are Wolosin, restrictions to campaigning that 46, a commu- the COVID-19 pandemic cre- Magali Gauthier nity advocate ated. She has been campaigning Maia Goel, a vote center worker, cleans a digital voting booth at Onetta Harris Community Center in Menlo Park on Election Day.
    [Show full text]
  • Boutique Hotel Opens in Menlo Park, a Stone's Throw from Facebook HQ
    SF Business Times ‐ 10/4/18 Boutique hotel opens in Menlo Park, a stone's throw from Facebook HQ By Emily Fancher – Deputy Managing Editor, San Francisco Business Times A former Shell gas station on El Camino has been transformed into the Park James Hotel, a 61‐ room boutique property. The hotel is just a stone’s throw from Sand Hill Road in one direction and Facebook's headquarters in the other. The hotel, and its restaurant, Oak + Violet, opened a few weeks ago at 1400 El Camino Real to serve business travelers during the week who are often frantically searching for a room as San Mateo County hotels quickly fill up. On weekends, the hotel, which is a five‐minute walk from downtown, is serving visitors to Stanford University and other leisure guests. The hotel opens as developers rush to cater to the growth from Facebook in the area, which has more than 10,000 employees down the road. The Hotel Nia opened earlier this year next to the social media giant’s headquarters. Four hotels are in the pipeline in neighboring Palo Alto and one in Redwood City. At the Menlo Park site, Portola Valley‐based developer Pollack Finance Group beat out 10 other bidders in 2015 for the property and assembled the team of Hornberger + Worstell to design the hotel and Build Group to construct it. Pollock tapped into city officials’ wish for a boutique hotel on the site to boost city coffers from hotel taxes. But the project was also personal for developer Jeff Pollack, who grew up and lives nearby.
    [Show full text]
  • Harvard and the Valley Make a Career Of
    JOHN HARVARD'S JOURNAL THE UNDERGRADUATE and writing furtive bits of fiction between classes. Most of my friends viewed my litera- ture habit as if I were collecting stamps— a quirky, old-fashioned hobby, nothing to Harvard and the Valley make a career of. Some reassured me that reading or writing could help toward a job by natasha lasky at a start-up, writing press kits or interview responses. Or, at the very least, that know- ing how to write could get me into college, he first person to congratulate world, from the cluster of venture-capital which could then get me a satisfying corpo- me on getting into Harvard was firms on Sand Hill Road to the Facebook rate career. I knew I didn’t want to work in Mark Zuckerberg. I clicked on headquarters off the 101. the Valley, but everything else felt irrelevant, the link in my acceptance email Silicon Valley felt like a company town— or unrealistic, so I learned to keep quiet. Tto find a picture of him looking back at any ambition was bent back toward tech Cambridge couldn’t have felt more alien; it me with his characteristic blank smile, as culture. Moms cooed over luncheons about was startling to see so many buildings made “Congratulations” appeared on the screen how someone’s son who got a good score of earthquake-unsafe bricks, covered in snow, in white sans serif font above his head. At in AP Calculus could code for Facebook, or all smashed together rather than spread out in the time I was too thrilled to pay much at- how someone’s daughter who gave a good 1970s corporate parks and strip malls.
    [Show full text]