DOCSLIB.ORG

Menlo Park Council Election: Early Results Show Wolosin in Lead

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Menlo Park Council Election: Early Results Show Wolosin in Lead THE HOMETOWN NEWSPAPER FOR MENLO PARK, ATHERTON, PORTOLA VALLEY AND WOODSIDE NOVEMBER 6, 2020 | VOL. 56 NO. 9 WWW.ALMANACNEWS.COM Menlo Park council election: Early results show Wolosin in lead By Kate Bradshaw project manager at Cisco; and Almanac Staff Writer Fennell, 33, a Black professional triathlete and entrepreneur who enlo Park’s first official owns Fenn Coffee. District 3 City Council District 3 includes a section of Mmember could be safe Menlo Park bounded between routes advocate Jen Wolosin. As Palo Alto and Atherton, stretch- of the most recent election results ing southwest to Crane Street available the morning of Nov. 4, and northeast to the VA prop- candidate Wolosin had received erty off of Willow Road. It the most votes at 1,266 or 59.8% includes the Civic Center, the of those count- Caltrain station and the neigh- ed so far. Chel- borhoods of Vintage Oaks, Lin- sea Nguyen had field Oaks and Felton Gables, 543 votes or among other areas. 25.7%, and Max On election night, Wolosin Fennell had said she was excited about the 306 or 14.5%. early results. “It’s really gratify- Go to is.gd/ ing and I am excited to get to smcresults to Jen Wolosin work for the residents of Menlo access the latest Park.” results. She added that she was proud The three of the work of her campaign candidates team, which adapted to the are Wolosin, restrictions to campaigning that 46, a commu- the COVID-19 pandemic cre- Magali Gauthier nity advocate ated. She has been campaigning Maia Goel, a vote center worker, cleans a digital voting booth at Onetta Harris Community Center in Menlo Park on Election Day. for bike and Chelsea Nguyen since January, which gave her a pedestrian head start on other candidates, issues and figure out how to cast ballots in the district race, Elections Office reported that the safety in Menlo as she was able to canvass part of move forward during difficult, there were a total of 3,448 Dis- preliminary tally only includes Park; Nguyen, the district before the pandemic (and) hopefully good times,” she trict 3 residents who voted in vote-by-mail ballots received in 56, a Vietnam- hit. “Some people thought it was said. the November 2016 presidential the mail or returned at voting ese Ameri- crazy, but I like to be prepared This is Menlo Park’s first elections. So far the county centers and drop boxes on or can U.S. Air and organized,” she said. District 3 election, so while has tallied 1,947 district votes, before Wednesday, Oct. 28. They Force veteran, “I’m really excited to try to there is no way to make a direct which means there may be a do not include vote center ballots, single mother bring the community together comparison to previous elec- substantial number left to count. of three and Max Fennell as we tackle big challenges and tions for how many voters may The San Mateo County See MENLO COUNCIL, page 18 Atherton council: Incumbent Elizabeth Lewis, newcomer Diana Hawkins-Manuelian take lead By Angela Swartz the San Mateo County Elections of the other candidates for run- waves when he endorsed emergency response services to Almanac Staff Writer Office on election night. These ning positive and energetic cam- Hawkins-Manuelian over Wiest the town. results include vote-by-mail bal- paigns and look forward to work- because she opposes the town’s Lewis was elected to the coun- ncumbent Elizabeth Lew- lots received in the mail, at a vote ing with them all in the future on controversial proposal to detach cil in November 2008, while is and newcomer Diana center or in a drop box on or committees and boards.” from the Menlo Park Fire Pro- Wiest was elected to the council IHawkins-Manuelian took an before Oct. 28. Hawkins-Manuelian said in a tection District, while claiming in 2012. David and Hawkins- early lead on election night in the “I am humbled and honored Wednesday email that since not that Wiest is in favor of it. Wiest Manuelian are both longtime race for two seats on the Ather- to have the opportunity to serve all the votes are in, it may be too denies he has ever supported Atherton residents. ton City Council. Incumbent the residents of our wonderful early to assume she has won. separation from the fire district. Some 3,199 of 5,241 ballots Cary Wiest was trailing. town of Atherton for four more “I am humbled and honored to Talks of separation were in the race were counted by the With about 61% of votes count- years,” said Lewis in a statement see the votes so far,” she said. “I spurred by a 2016 fire services close of election night. ed, Lewis was leading with 36.5% Wednesday morning. “I promise am ready to roll up my sleeves if study, which showed a dispar- Wiest could not be reached for of the vote. Hawkins-Manuelian to do my best to listen to our resi- I do win.” ity between the fixed percentage a comment by press time on had 26.4%, while Wiest had dents, learn from their experi- This race marks the first time of property tax revenues from Wednesday. A 22.3% and newcomer Christine ences and work to make policies in six years there has been a con- Atherton that fund the fire David had 14.8%, according to that will benefit all of Atherton. tested election in town. district and how much it actu- Email Angela Swartz at semi-official results posted by I would like to congratulate each Mayor Rick DeGolia made ally costs the district to provide [email protected] INSIDE ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT 21 Read up-to-the-minute news on AlmanacNews.com Get a head start to <<CALL OUT>> 460 Tayberry, Brentwood 2 Bed | 3 Bath | Price Upon Request | 460tayberry.com Jo Ann Luisi Anna Marie Luisi Adams `KU`S 925.321.6104 925.642.9994 DRE 1399250 DRE 02106032 your home. As we adjust to these KVBbUWbUsWaOpÛdtoBUObsp <<CALL OUT>> are proud to support their local communities and are 2442 Sharon Oaks Drive, Menlo Park OM Ś BsV Ś ĝÛÛ Ś KdalBppàKda Louise S DeDera KdaaWssOMsdVO_lWbU|dtbM 650.642.1422 the perfect place for you to . call home. <<CALL OUT>> 3421 El Camino Real, #32D, Atherton OM Ś BsV Ś ĝÛÛ Ś KdalBppàKda Louise S DeDera 650.642.1422 . Compass is the brand name used for services provided by one or more of the Compass group of subsidiary companies. Compass is a real estate broker licensed by the State of California and abides by Equal Housing Opportunity laws. WKObpO!taJOopBbMà__aBsOoWB_loOpObsOMVOoOWbWpWbsObMOMTdoWbTdoaBsWdbB_ltoldpOpdb_|BbMWpKdalW_OMTodapdtoKOpMOOaOMoO_WBJ_OJtsVBpbdsJOObyOoWOMà VBbUOpWbloWKOÛKdbMWsWdbÛpB_OdozWsVMoBzB_ may be made without notice. No statement is made as to accuracy of any description. All measurements and square footage are approximate. 2QThe AlmanacQAlmanacNews.comQNovember 6, 2020 PROPERTY SHOWCASE BY HUGH CORNISH & ASSOCIATES FOR SALE FOR SALE Contemporary Indoor/Outdoor Design with Extraordinary Beauty World-Class Equestrian & Vineyard Estate 56 HILLBROOK DRIVE, PORTOLA VALLEY 60 VALLEY COURT, ATHERTON* Exceptional custom home built in 2007; 4 bedrooms, offi ce, and 4.5 baths, Rare west Atherton estate on approx. 7.5 acres; 5 bedrooms and 4.5 including detached guest house; fi tness studio; Solar-powered electricity baths, including a 1-bedroom, 1-bath au pair unit with kitchen; private and back-up generator; myriad outdoor venues; approx. one acre two-story 1-bedroom, 1-bath guest house; 6-stall barn, riding arena Offered at $7,995,000 | 56Hillbrook.com Offered at $10,888,000 | 60Valley.com *Mailing address is in Atherton; per county records, property resides in Town of Woodside FOR SALE FOR SALE Cape Cod Elegance Meets California Casual in Atherton Completely Remodeled Condo Near Stanford 65 MAPLE AVENUE, ATHERTON 2140 SANTA CRUZ AVENUE, D107, MENLO PARK Acclaimed Atherton location; 4 bedrooms and 3.5 baths, detached studio 2 bedrooms and 2 baths; Menlo Commons 55+ Active Community; with wet bar and bath; ground-fl oor primary en suite bedroom with private completely remodeled in 2016; private deck; secured underground patio; newly landscaped garden; patio with built in BBQ and fi re pit parking, common-area clubhouse, pool, and hot tub Offered at $4,475,000 | 65Maple.com Offered at $1,249,000 | 2140SantaCruzD107.com For a private showing of these extraordinary properties, please contact: & ASSOCIATES HughCornish.com HUGH CORNISH STEPHANIE ELKINS VAN LINGE Ranked #1 Agent in SF Bay Area 650.619.6461 650.400.2933 Coldwell Banker, 2019 [email protected] [email protected] Ranked #30 Agent in the U.S. CalRE#00912143 CalRE#00897565 RESIDENTIAL BROKERAGE The Wall Street Journal, 2020 The property information herein is derived from various sources that may include, but not be limited to, county records and the Multiple Listing Service, and it may include approximations. Although the information is believed to be accurate, it is not warranted and you should not rely upon it without personal verifi cation. Real estate agents affi liated with Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage are independent contractor agents and are not employees of the Company. ©2020 Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage. All Rights Reserved. Coldwell Banker Over $2.5 Billion in Sales Residential Brokerage fully supports the principles of the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Opportunity Act. Owned by a subsidiary of NRT LLC. Coldwell Banker and the Coldwell Banker Logo are registered service marks owned by Coldwell Banker Real Estate LLC. CalRE #01908304. November 6, 2020QAlmanacNews.comQThe AlmanacQ3 Picturesque Mediterranean-Style Home in Coveted Vintage Oaks • • • • • • 158 Seminary Drive, Menlo Park Bedrooms: 5 | Bathrooms: 3.5 | Living: 3,587 sq ft | Lot: 11,771 sq ft List Price: $4,989,000 Nick Granoski | 650-269-8556 [email protected] DRE 00994196 David Weil | 650-823-3855 [email protected] DRE 01400271 Compass is a real estate broker licensed by the State of California and abides by Equal Housing Opportunity laws.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
    Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 2131 Sand Hill Road Office Project March 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms and Abbreviations……………………………………………………...………………………………………..v Section 1.0 Introduction and Purpose ................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose of The Initial Study ................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Public Review Period ............................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Consideration of the Initial Study and Project ........................................................................ 1 1.4 Notice of Determination ......................................................................................................... 1 Section 2.0 Project Information ......................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Project Title ............................................................................................................................ 3 2.2 Lead Agency Contact ............................................................................................................. 3 2.3 Project Applicant .................................................................................................................... 3 2.4 Project Location ...................................................................................................................... 3 2.5 Assessor’s
    [Show full text]
  • (SB #097802) [email protected]
    Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 12/04/2020 09:16 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Mariscal,Deputy Clerk 20SMCV01866 Assigned for all purposes to: Santa Monica Courthouse, Judicial Officer: H. Ford III 1 DANIEL M. PETROCELLI (S.B. #097802) [email protected] 2 MOLLY M. LENS (S.B. #283867) [email protected] 3 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 1999 Avenue of the Stars, 8th Floor 4 Los Angeles, CA 90067-6035 Telephone: (310) 553-6700 5 Facsimile: (310) 246-6779 6 ERIC AMDURSKY (S.B. #180288) [email protected] 7 O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 2765 Sand Hill Road 8 Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: (650) 473-2600 9 Facsimile: (650) 473-2601 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. 11 12 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 13 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, WEST DISTRICT 14 ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC., a Delaware Case No. Corporation, 15 Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR: 16 vs. (1) Intentional Interference with 17 Contract; NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and 18 DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, (2) Unfair Competition – Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ Code 17200 et seq.; and 19 Defendants. (3) Aiding and Abetting Breach of 20 Fiduciary Duty 21 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COMPLAINT 1 Plaintiff Activision Blizzard, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Activision”), for its complaint against 2 Netflix, Inc. (“Netflix” or “Defendant”), alleges on knowledge as to itself and its own acts, and on 3 information and belief as to all other matters, as follows: 4 NATURE OF ACTION 5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Class Action Complaint
    1 Laurence M. Rosen, Esq. (SBN 219683) THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. 2 FI fL tE B 355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2450 . AN MATEO COUNTY Los Angeles, CA 90071 3 Telephone: (213) 785-2610 4 Facsimile: (213) 226-4684 Email: [email protected] 5 SARRAF GENTILE LLP 6 Ronen Sarraf . Joseph Gentile 7 14 Bond Street, Suite 212 8 Great Neck, New York (516) 699-8890 9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 10 11 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 12 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 18 e , v8 2 2 ~ 8 m 13 ~----------- OHNNY HOSEY and GEORGE SHILLIARE, ) Case No.: _______ -< 14 ndividually and on behalf of all others similarly ) 'T1 ituated, ) )> 15 ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT )< Plaintiffs, ) 16 ) s. ) 17 I I ) RICHARD 9,osTOLO, MIKE.,,PUPTA, LUCA ) DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 18 BARATTA, JACK DORSEY, BETER ) CHERNIN, :PETER CURRIE(I>ETER" ) 19 FENTON,1)AVIDROSENBLATT:'EVAN / ) ) 20 WJLLIAMS, GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO., -'/ ) MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LkC, J.P. 1/ I ) 21 MORGAN SECURITIES LLC,"TWITTER, ) /1~-CIV0;228 ... INC., MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER ) I CMP i Complaint Filed 22 & SMITH INCORPORATElt), DEUTSCHE ) BANK SECURITIES INC./ALLEN & ) 23 COMPANY LLC, and CODE ADVISORS LLC, ) ) ; 1i1111111111111111111rnm1 ~ 24 ) 25 26 27 28 COMPLAINT Plaintiffs Johnny Hosey ("Hosey") and George Shilliare ("Shilliare")( collectively 2 "Plaintiffs") make the following allegations, individually and on behalf of all others similarly 3 situated, based upon the investigation by Plaintiffs' counsel, which included among other things, an 4 analysis of publicly available news articles, reports, corporate webcasts with analysts, public filings 5 made with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), and securities analysts' reports about 6 Twitter, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Master Plan Oversight and Outreach Committee
    AGENDA ITEM D-1 Transportation Master Plan Oversight and Outreach Committee SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES - DRAFT Date: 8/30/2018 Time: 6:30 p.m. Belle Haven School 415 Ivy Dr., Menlo Park, CA 94025 Meeting notes taken by the consultant team are attached to these minutes (Attachment). A. Call to Order Oversight and Outreach Committee (Committee) Co-Chair Keith called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m. B. Roll Call Present: Diane Bailey (late arrival), Andrew Barnes, Chris DeCardy (late arrival), Kirsten Keith, Adina Levin (late arrival), Henry Riggs, Sarah Staley Shenk, Katherine Strehl, Jen Wolosin Absent: Catherine Carlton, Jacqueline Cebrian City Staff: Kristiann Choy, Kevin Chen, Alex Skoch Consultant Staff: Mark Spencer, Nick Bleich, Andre Huff, Jeff Knowles, Katharine Pan, Kacy Wilson, Katie DeLeuw C. Public Comment • Pamela Jones requested that the Transportation Management Plan (TMP) be connected to the Belle Haven Traffic Calming Plan. D. Regular Business D1. Approve the Oversight and Outreach Committee meeting minutes of May 30, 2018 The Committee discussed converting to summary minutes. ACTION: Motion and second (Wolosin/Barnes) to approve the Oversight and Outreach Committee meeting minutes of May 30, 2018. The motion passed (3-2-1-5; Strehl/Shenk abstained, Riggs dissented, Bailey/Carlton/Cebrian/DeCardy/Levin absent,). D2. Present project overview and introduce open house meeting format Committee members Bailey/DeCardy/Levin arrived during agenda item D2. • Sheryl Bims commented that the Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) should be related to the location of development and the improvements funded by the program. Bims also spoke on traffic calming measures to be included in the TMP and the need for the Safe Routes to School program to include the Belle Haven neighborhood.
    [Show full text]
  • TRIPLEPOINT VENTURE GROWTH BDC CORP. 2755 Sand Hill Road, Suite 150 Menlo Park, California 94025 (650) 854-2090
    TRIPLEPOINT VENTURE GROWTH BDC CORP. 2755 Sand Hill Road, Suite 150 Menlo Park, California 94025 (650) 854-2090 April 6, 2020 Dear Stockholder: You are cordially invited to attend the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp., a Maryland corporation (the “Company,” “TPVG,” “we,” “us” or “our”), to be held electronically via live webcast on Friday, May 1, 2020 at 10:30 a.m., Pacific Time. The live webcast will be accessible over the internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TPVG2020. The notice of the Annual Meeting and the proxy statement accompanying this letter provide an outline of the business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting. At the Annual Meeting, you will be asked to: (1) elect two directors of the Company; (2) ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020; and (3) to transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting, or any postponement or adjournment thereof. You have the right to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting if you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on April 6, 2020. It is very important that your shares be represented at the Annual Meeting. Even if you plan to attend the meeting electronically via the live webcast, we urge you to complete, date and sign the enclosed proxy card and promptly return it in the envelope provided. If you prefer, you can save time by authorizing your proxy through the Internet at www.proxyvote.com or by telephone as described in the proxy statement and on the enclosed proxy card.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation and Traffic
    4.13 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC This chapter describes the existing traffic conditions of the EA Study Area and evaluates the potential envi- ronmental consequences of future development that could occur by adopting and implementing the pro- posed Housing Element Update, General Plan Consistency Update, and associated Zoning Ordinances amendments, together referred to as the “Plan Components” on transportation and traffic. A summary of the relevant regulatory setting and existing conditions is followed by a discussion of Plan Components and cumulative impacts. The chapter is based on the traffic analysis prepared by TJKM Transportation Consultants dated March 8, 2013, herein referred to as “Traffic Study.” The future baseline traffic volumes have been developed from output of the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG) travel demand model run by the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA). The travel demand associated with the Plan Components have been obtained from the C/CAG Model based upon the anticipated future land uses that have been developed resulting from the land use controls under Near-Term 2014 and 2035 condi- tions. The complete Traffic Study and technical appendices are included in Appendix F of this EA. A. Regulatory Framework 1. Federal Laws and Regulations a. Federal Highway Administration The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is the agency of the United States (U.S.) Department of Transportation (DOT) responsible for the federally-funded roadway system, including the interstate high- way network and portions of the primary State highway network, such as Interstate 280 (I-280). b. Americans with Disabilities Act The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 provides comprehensive rights and protections to indi- viduals with disabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Will the Quants Invade Sand Hill Road? | Venturebeat
    Will the quants invade Sand Hill Road? | VentureBeat http://venturebeat.com/2010/10/21/will-the-quants-invade-sand-... VentureBeat Will the quants invade Sand Hill Road? October 21, 2010 | Alex Salkever 7 Comments Will the quants storm the clubby bastions of the venture capital world? That question has been coming up frequently of late. At the Demo 2010 conference, InLab Ventures rolled out a new venture capital program it dubbed VC3.0 that included elimination of carry fees and incentives for board members to spend time with invested startups. Most importantly, though, the InLab Ventures platform features back-tested screening technology that InLab claims can quickly and accurately identify which startups have a greater chance of success even before initial funding occurs. In other words, InLab says it has a mathematical and statistical model that can predict startup success. Apparently the technology is decent, as InLab general partner Greg Doyle told me that at least one major consulting firm doing research into VC markets has licensed the model for due diligence purposes. If InLab’s magical model works and math can replace that vaunted gut judgment that to date has been a critical criteria for deciding whether to invest in a startup, then why should VCs be using their gut to pick investments at all? (a point raised by VC gadfly Paul Kedrosky). Why not let the quants, the propeller-heads that designed trading models for Wall Street and for other hard-to-value asset classes do the same for Silicon Valley? 1 of 11 10/27/10 4:54 PM Will the quants invade Sand Hill Road? | VentureBeat http://venturebeat.com/2010/10/21/will-the-quants-invade-sand-..
    [Show full text]
  • 4.9 Land Use and Planning
    CONNECTMENLO: GENERAL PLAN LAND US E & CIRCULATION ELEM E N T S A N D M - 2 AREA ZONING UPDATE CITY OF MENLO PARK LAND USE AND PLANNING 4.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING This chapter describes the existing land use character in the City of Menlo Park and evaluates the potential environmental impacts from future development that could occur by adopting and implementing the proposed project described in Chapter 3, Project Description, of this Draft EIR. 4.9.1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 4.9.1.1 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK This section describes existing regional and local regulations and plans that pertain to land use in Menlo Park. There are no federal regulations applicable to the proposed project in this chapter. State Regulations Cortese-Knox Act The Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 20001 establishes a Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) in each county in California, and authorizes these commissions to review, approve, or deny proposals for boundary changes and incorporations for cities, counties, and special districts. The LAFCo establishes a “sphere of influence” (SOI) for cities within their jurisdiction that describes the city's probable future physical boundaries and service area. The Menlo Park SOI is regulated by the San Mateo County LAFCo. The Menlo Park SOI is shown on Figure 3-4 in Chapter 3, Project Description, of this Draft EIR. Senate Bill 375 In order to aid in reaching the goals set by Assembly Bill (AB) 32, Senate Bill (SB) 375 directs the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to set regional targets for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from cars and light trucks.
    [Show full text]
  • Staff Report #18-225-CC
    AGENDA ITEM I-4 Public Works STAFF REPORT City Council Meeting Date: 12/4/2018 Staff Report Number: 18-225-CC Informational Item: Update on the citywide Safe Routes to School program Recommendation This is an informational item and does not require City Council action. Policy Issues The development of a Citywide Safe Routes to School program (Program) is included as one of the top-six priority projects in the City Council’s adopted 2018 work plan. The program is also an implementation program included in the 2016 general plan circulation element. Background On February 6, 2018, the City Council adopted its 2018 work plan, including the Citywide Safe Routes to school program and further prioritized it as one of the city’s top-six priority projects. Accordingly, staff reprioritized work efforts and prepared a draft request for proposals for the program. The Safe Routes to School subcommittee of the Complete Streets Commission and advocates from Parents for Safe Routes reviewed the draft request for proposals. Staff incorporated this feedback and released the request for proposals May 2, 2018. Six proposals were received by the May 23, 2018, due date. A team of seven people comprised of City staff and Complete Streets Commission subcommittee members reviewed proposals and recommended Alta Planning + Design to initiate the program. Authorization for entering into an agreement with Alta Planning + Design was approved at the City Council meeting June 19, 2018. A notice to proceed was given in July 2018, and this report serves as an update to the work that has been performed over the last five months.
    [Show full text]
  • DRIVING to CAMPUS: from Highway 101 North & South: Take The
    DRIVING TO CAMPUS: From Highway 101 North & South: Take the Embarcadero Road exit west toward Stanford. At El Camino Real, Embarcadero turns into Galvez Street as it enters the university. Turn right onto Campus Drive, and follow it around to Panama Street. Turn left onto Panama Street. There will be an open parking lot on your right, and a parking structure on your left. You may park in either location. The Durand Building is to the left at the end of Panama Street as it curves around and becomes Samuel Morris Way. From Highway 280 North & South: Exit 280 at Sand Hill Road, heading east. Make a right turn on Santa Cruz Avenue, then a left turn onto Junipero Serra Boulevard. Turn right at the third stoplight, Campus Drive West. Continue around Campus Drive West and turn right when you reach Panama Street. There will be an open parking lot on your right, and a parking structure on your left. You may park in either location. The Durand Building is to the left at the end of Panama Street as it curves around and becomes Samuel Morris Way. From El Camino Real: Exit El Camino Real at University Avenue. Turn toward the hills (away from the center of Palo Alto). As you enter Stanford, University Avenue becomes Palm Drive. Go through one traffic light, and turn right onto Campus Drive. Turn left onto Panama Street. There will be an open parking lot on your right, and a parking structure on your left. You may park in either location. The Durand Building is to the left at the end of Panama Street as it curves around and becomes Samuel Morris Way.
    [Show full text]
  • Cert Petition
    No. 20-____ IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ____________________ FACEBOOK, INC., Petitioner, v. PERRIN AIKENS DAVIS ET AL., Respondents. ____________________ On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ____________________ PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI ____________________ Michael R. Dreeben Jeffrey L. Fisher Ephraim McDowell Counsel of Record O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 1625 Eye Street, N.W. 2765 Sand Hill Road Washington, D.C. 20006 Menlo Park, CA 94025 (202) 383-5300 (650) 473-2633 [email protected] Yaira Dubin O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP Times Square Tower 7 Times Square New York, N.Y. 10036 (212) 326-2000 i QUESTION PRESENTED The Wiretap Act prohibits the “intentional[] inter- cept[ion]” of an “electronic communication,” but pre- cludes liability for a “party to [a] communication” or when a party consents to the interception. 18 U.S.C. § 2511(1), (2)(d). Internet webpages are frequently composed of content—images and text—sent from multiple providers according to instructions commu- nicated by a user’s web browser to obtain that con- tent. The question presented is: Whether an internet content provider violates the Wiretap Act where a computer user’s web browser in- structs the provider to display content on the webpage the user visits. ii PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING Facebook, Inc. is Petitioner here and was Defend- ant-Appellee below. Perrin Aikens Davis, Brian K. Lentz, Cynthia D. Quinn, and Matthew J. Vickery are Respondents here and were Plaintiffs-Appellants below. iii CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Facebook, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed District Budget Fiscal Year 2019-2020 June 12, 2019
    Board of Trustees Georgia Jack President SUHSD [email protected] Sequoia Union Allen Weiner High School District Vice President 480 James Avenue [email protected] Redwood City, CA 94062 Alan Sarver Administration Clerk [email protected] Mary E. Streshly, Ed.D., Superintendent [email protected] Carrie Du Bois Trustee Enrique Navas, MBA [email protected] Assistant Superintendent, Administrative Services Christopher Thomsen [email protected] Trustee [email protected] Dina Stewart, Controller [email protected] Gerryk Madrigal and Elise Kratzer Student Trustees Proposed District Budget Fiscal Year 2019-2020 June 12, 2019 Page 1 of 52 Table of Contents Contents SUPERINTENDENT’S MESSAGE ............................................................................................................................... 4 ABOUT THE SEQUOIA UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT ........................................................................................... 5 STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT AND ACADEMIC PROGRAMS .......................................................................................... 7 LOCAL CONTROL AND ACCOUNTABILITY PLAN ...................................................................................................... 7 BUDGET REQUIREMENTS - BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................. 8 STATE BUDGET .................................................................................................................................................... 10 BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]