The C C H S Newsletter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

TheTheThe C C H S Newsletter Carroll County Historical Society P. O. Box 1308 Carrollton, GA 30112 NOVEMBER 2015 Carroll County Irregulars Return to Second Manassas Last April, twenty members of the Carroll County Irregulars, a group of Civil War enthusiasts from Carrollton, made their annual trip to a major battlefield to relive the history of the area by studying the armies and the tactics of their generals. This year they were joined by John Hennessy, Chief Historian of Fredricksburg and author of “Return to Bull Run: The Campaign and Battle of Second Manassas”. At next Tuesday’s general meeting of the Historical Society, Dr. Jack Crews, Dr. Peter Worthy, and Robert Carter will report on this trip. Second Manassas demonstrated the impact of the expanding war in terms of the size of the armies that fought there and in the numbers of casualties resulting from the battle. The campaign showed the effects of a widening Union war effort, resulting in increasing impacts upon civilians. The campaign also marked the rise of Robert E. Lee as a battlefield commander: his success at Second Manassas opened the opportunity to the Confederate army to carry the war into the North. On the Confederate side, Gen. Robert E. Lee's Army of Northern Virginia was organized into two "wings" totaling about 55,000 men. The "right wing" was commanded by Maj. Gen. James Longstreet, the left by Maj. Gen. Stonewall Jackson. The Cavalry Division under Maj. Gen. J.E.B. Stuart was attached to Jackson's wing. The Union Army of Virginia was divided into three corps of 51,000 men, under Maj. Gen. Franz Stigel ( I Corps ); Maj. Gen. Nathaniel P. banks ( II Corps ); and Maj. Gen. Irvin McDowell, who had led the losing Union army at First Bull Run ( III Corps ). Parts of three corps (III , V, and VI ) of McClellan's Army of the Potomac and Maj. Gen. Ambrose Burnside's IX Corps (commanded by Maj. Gen. Jesse L. Reno), eventually joined Pope for combat operations, raising his strength to 77,000. Tuesday, November 17th, at 6:30 PM The Carrollton Depot Light refreshments will be served. The public is cordially invited. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The Lincoln- Mcclellan Relationship in Myth and Memory
The Lincoln- McClellan Relationship in Myth and Memory MARK GRIMSLEY Like many Civil War historians, I have for many years accepted invita- tions to address the general public. I have nearly always tried to offer fresh perspectives, and these have generally been well received. But almost invariably the Q and A or personal exchanges reveal an affec- tion for familiar stories or questions. (Prominent among them is the query “What if Stonewall Jackson had been present at Gettysburg?”) For a long time I harbored a private condescension about this affec- tion, coupled with complete incuriosity about what its significance might be. But eventually I came to believe that I was missing some- thing important: that these familiar stories, endlessly retold in nearly the same ways, were expressions of a mythic view of the Civil War, what the amateur historian Otto Eisenschiml memorably labeled “the American Iliad.”1 For Eisenschiml “the American Iliad” was merely a clever title for a compendium of eyewitness accounts of the conflict, but I take the term seriously. In Homer’s Iliad the anger of Achilles, the perfidy of Agamemnon, the doomed gallantry of Hector—and the relationships between them—have enormous, uncontested, unchanging, and almost primal symbolic meaning. So too do certain figures in the American Iliad. Prominent among these are the butcher Grant, the Christ-like Lee, and the rage- filled Sherman. I believe that the traditional Civil War narrative functions as a national myth of central importance to our understanding of ourselves as Americans. And like the classic mythologies of old, it contains timeless wisdom about what it means to be a human being.
[Show full text]
Collection SC 0084 W. Roger Smith Civil War Research Collection 1862
Collection SC 0084 W. Roger Smith Civil War Research Collection 1862 Table of Contents User Information Historical Sketch Scope and Content Note Container List Processed by Emily Hershman 27 June 2011 Thomas Balch Library 208 W. Market Street Leesburg, VA 20176 USER INFORMATION VOLUME OF COLLECTION: 2 folders COLLECTION DATES: 1862 PROVENANCE: W. Roger Smith, Midland, TX. ACCESS RESTRICTIONS: Collection open for research USE RESTRICTIONS: No physical characteristics affect use of this material. REPRODUCTION RIGHTS: Permission to reproduce or publish material in this collection must be obtained in writing from Thomas Balch Library. CITE AS: W. Roger Smith Civil War Research Collection, 1862 (SC 0084), Thomas Balch Library, Leesburg, VA. ALTERNATE FORMATS: None OTHER FINDING AIDS: None TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS: None RELATED HOLDINGS: None ACCESSION NUMBERS: 1995.0046 NOTES: Formerly filed in Thomas Balch Library Vertical Files 2 HISTORICAL SKETCH From its organization in July 1861, the Army of the Potomac remained the primary Union military force in the East, confronting General Robert E. Lee’s (1807-1870) Army of Northern Virginia in a series of battles and skirmishes. In the early years of the Civil War, however, the Army of the Potomac suffered defeats at the Battle of the First Bull Run in 1861, the Peninsula Campaign and the Battle of Fredericksburg in 1862, as well as the Battle of Chancellorsville in 1863. Historians attribute its initial lack of victories to poor leadership from a succession of indecisive generals: Irvin McDowell (1818-1885), George McClellan (1826-1885), Ambrose Burnside (1824-1881), and Joseph Hooker (1814-1879). When General George Meade (1815-1872) took command of the Army of the Potomac in June 1863, he was successful in pushing the Army of Northern Virginia out of Pennsylvania following the Battle of Gettysburg.
[Show full text]
William Tecumseh Sherman 1820–1891
Activities: Guided Reading/Secondary William Tecumseh Sherman 1820–1891 William Tecumseh (W.T.) Sherman was regarded as one of the most competent and effective military leaders of the Union army during the Civil War. He was born in Lancaster, Ohio, on February 8, 1820. After his father died at an early age, Sherman’s mother split the family. Sherman was sent to live with Thomas Ewing, a lifelong family friend. Sherman later married Ewing’s daughter Ellen. Sherman attended the United States Military Academy at West Point, graduated in 1840 and was on active duty during the Mexican War. He reported to duty in San Francisco, California. Sherman, however, grew weary of battle and combat, and he resigned his position, but remained in the area. In time, Sherman entered the banking industry, and he became business partners with several individuals in different ventures. He then left San Francisco to become superintendent of the Louisiana State Seminary and Military Academy, located in Alexandria. Sherman eventually left this job and relocated his family to St. Louis, Missouri. Here he was president of the Fifth Street Railroad. When the nation moved toward the Civil War in 1861, Sherman contacted the Secretary of War. He offered three years of military service to the nation, while the norm was only three months. Sherman became a colonel in the Thirteenth Regular Infantry, working closely with the First Division of General Irvin McDowell’s army and General Daniel Tyler. He saw action in the Civil War during the First Battle of Bull Run where, due to their use of cannon fire, the Confederate forces defeated him.
[Show full text]
The Civil War in Prince William County
The Civil War in Prince William County Text by Jan Townsend Edited and Expanded by James Burgess Prince William County Historical Commission 2011 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface 3 Battle of First Manassas 5 Liberia 5 Mayfield Fort 6 Yorkshire (Wilmer McLean Home) 7 Blackburn’s Ford 8 Signal Hill 9 Ben Lomond Manor House 10 Henry Hill 11 Sudley Methodist Church 12 Potomac River Blockade 14 Freestone Point (Leesylvania State Park) 14 Cockpit Point (Possum Nose) Battery 15 William’s Ordinary (Love’s Tavern), Dumfries 16 Evansport - Shipping Point Batteries 17 Occoquan 18 Bacon Race Church Site 19 Wolf Run Shoals and Sally-Davis Ford Defenses 20 Battle of Second Manassas 22 Stone House 22 Lucinda Dogan House 23 Bloom (Conner) House 24 Thoroughfare Gap – Chapman’s (Beverley) Mill 25 Groveton Confederate Cemetery 26 Unfinished Railroad 27 Stone Bridge 28 Cavalry Operations and Mosby’s Confederacy 30 St. Paul’s Church, Haymarket 30 Selecman’s (Snyder’s) Ford 31 Hopewell Gap – Antioch Church 32 Evergreen 33 Greenwich 34 Ewell’s Chapel 35 Cannon Branch Fort 36 John Singleton Mosby 37 Battle of Bristoe Station 39 Bristoe Station 40 Brentsville 41 Battle of Buckland and the Buckland Races 44 Buckland 44 Manassas Town Cemetery (Confederate Monument) 45 Appendix A: Chronology of the Civil War in Prince William County 46 Appendix B: Map of Civil War Sites in Prince William County 49 2 Preface On April 17, 1861, five days after the first shots were fired at Fort Sumter and two days after President Lincoln’s call for 75,000 volunteers to suppress the rebellion, the Virginia Convention passed an ordinance of secession.
[Show full text]
Fredericksburg and Spotsylvania
Fredericksburg and Spotsylvania NATIONAL MILITARY PARK Virginia Shortly before noon, Gen. Edwin Sumner's McClellan's failure to advance against mander of the Army of the Potomac, defeated van of Gen. Richard S. Ewell's Confederate wing began attacking Marye's Heights. Ar either of the separated wings of the Confed Lee at Gettysburg, Pa., July 1-3. corps on the Orange Turnpike. Warren Fredericksburg and tillery atop the hill, and Longstreet's infan erate army caused his replacement. His suc Casualties: In the battle of Chancellors attacked and was repulsed. To the south, try at the base behind a stone wall along the cessor, Gen. Ambrose E. Burnside, who ville, the Federals lost 17,278 men out of Gen. A. P. Hill's Confederate corps on the Sunken Road, shattered wave after wave of Spotsylvania assumed command on November 9, 1862, 133,868; the Confederates, 12,821 out of Orange Plank Road met Gen. George W. the Federal battlelines. Burnside wasted the presented to President Lincoln a plan which 60,892. Getty's Federal division which had rushed involved a rapid movement on Fredericks steadfast courage of his troops in piecemeal forward to secure the vital intersection of NATIONAL MILITARY PARK burg, thence a march southward against Rich frontal assaults against an impregnable posi Battle of the Wilderness the Plank and Brock roads. Gen. Winfield mond, his army to be supplied from Potomac tion. During the night of December 15-16, From Gettysburg Lee returned to Virginia, S. Hancock's Corps, reinforcing Getty, held River bases east of Fredericksburg.
[Show full text]
"4.+?$ Signature and Title of Certifying Official
NPS Fonn 10-900-b OMB No. 10244018 (March 1992) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES MULTIPLE PROPERTY DOCUMENTATIONFORM This form is used for documenting multiple pmpcny pups relating to one or several historic wnvxe. Sainsrmctions in How lo Complele the Mul1,ple Property D~mmmlationFonn (National Register Bullnin 16B). Compleveach item by entering the requested information. For addillanal space. use wntinuation shau (Form 10-900-a). Use a rypwiter, word pmarror, or computer to complete dl ivms. A New Submission -Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Llstlng The Civil War in Virginia, 1861-1865: Historic and Archaeological Resources - B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each acsociated historic conk* identifying theme, gmgmphid al and chronological Mod foreach.) The Civil War in Virginia, 1861-1865: Historic and Archaeological Resources - - C. Form Prepared by -- - nameltitle lohn S. Salmon organization Virginia De~artmentof Historic Resourceg smet & number 2801 Kensineton Avenue telephone 804-367-2323 em. 117 city or town -state VA zip code222l As ~ ~ -~~ - ~ ~~~ -~~ An~~~ ~~ sr amended I the duimated authoriw unda the National Hislaic~.~~ R*urvlion of 1%6. ~ hmbv~ ~~ ccrtih. ha this docummfation form , ~ ,~~ mauthe Nhlond Regutn docummunon and xu forth requ~rnncnufor the Istmg of related pmpnia wns~svntw~thihc~mund Rcglster crivna Thu submiu~onmsm ihc prcce4unl ~d pmfes~onalrcqutmnu uc lath in 36 CFR Pan M) ~d the Scsmar) of the Intenoh Standar& Md Guidelina for Alshoology and Historic Revnation. LSa wntinuation shafor additi01w.I wmmmu.) "4.+?$ Signature and title of certifying official I hereby certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register.
[Show full text]
Important Battles of the Civil
Social Studies Survey I CAN: 1. Explain the significance of major battles that happened during the Civil War 2. Analyze how the improvement of technology (such as the Minie ball) but the lack of improvement in war strategy lead to massive casualties unlike any seen in American History Fort Sumter (SC) Battle of Fort Sumter (April 12, 1861) Begins the Civil War Confederates demanded that Fort Sumter surrender Union troops refused Confederates opened fire April 13 – Union surrendered Started the 4 year war 4 more states join the Confederacy after the Battle of Fort Sumter (AK, TN, VA, NC) First Battle of Bull Run/Manassas July 21, 1861 (Virginia) Union Confederates 2896 Casualties 1982 Casualties Irvin McDowell Joseph E. Johnston and P.G.T Beauregard Victory Bull Run Cont. Thomas J. Jackson was given the nickname “Stonewall”: “There is Jackson standing like a stone wall! Rally behind the Virginians!” Defeat lead North to realize they needed a large, well- trained army Two names because North named them by natural resources and South by nearby towns, farms, etc. Battle of Shiloh April 6-7, 1862 (Tennessee) Union Confederates 13,047 Causalities 10,700 Causalities U.S Grant Albert Sidney Johnston Victory (highest ranking officer to be killed in battle) Battle of Shiloh Cont. Up to this point, bloodiest battle in American History (23,700 causalities) “Bloody Pond” probably not there; definitely not that bloody In Hebrew, Shiloh means “place of peace” Battle of Antietam/Sharpsburg September 17, 1862 (MD) Union Confederate 12,400 Casualties 10,300 Casualties General George B. McClellan General Robert E Lee Probably victory Battle of Antietam Cont.
[Show full text]
“The Spirit Which You Have Aided to Infuse”: A. Lincoln, Little Mac, Fighting Joe, and the Question of Accountability in Union Command Relations
“The Spirit Which You Have Aided to Infuse”: A. Lincoln, Little Mac, Fighting Joe, and the Question of Accountability in Union Command Relations ETHAN S. RAFUSE In January 1863, Abraham Lincoln wrote a letter to Major General Joseph Hooker on the latter’s assumption of command that month. In the letter Lincoln famously addressed rumors that Hooker had called for a dictator in order to place Union civil- military relations, badly warped in the months that preceded Hooker’s ascension to command, on a more proper footing. Lincoln also decided to address a signifi- cant problem that had plagued the Army of the Potomac during and after George B. McClellan’s time in command. “The government will support you to the utmost of its ability, which is neither more nor less than it has done and will do for all commanders,” Lincoln assured Hooker before warning him, “I much fear that the spirit which you have aided to infuse into the Army, of criticizing their Commander, and withholding confidence from him, will now turn upon you. I shall assist you as far as I can, to put it down. Neither you, nor Napoleon, if he were alive again, could get any good out of an army, while such a spirit prevails.”1 Praise for Lincoln’s letter, both its content and its tone; its chastise- ment of Hooker for making the letter necessary; and its expression of concerns about Hooker’s character while he was in command are common in recent literature that touches on the Union war effort and American civil- military relations.
[Show full text]
06 Introduction to the Civil War.Indd
Introduction to the Civil War “WE FAILED, BUT IN THE GOOD PROVIDENCE OF GOD APPARENT FAILURE OFTEN PROVES A BLESSING.” —Robert E. Lee *** THE CIVIL WAR WAS A COMPLEX conflict that took this nation through its darkest period. The complexity of the Civil War involved every facet of life. The war tore at the heart of all that America stands for. It cut to the very core of the political, economic, and social elements of American life. The argument centered on where ulti- mate sovereignty lay—whether with the Union or with the individual states. It questioned the economic and social structure basis in slave power and agriculture in the South. The Civil War is remembered as the war that 107 pitted brother against brother because of the brutal nature of the tensions at work. In the words of then Secretary of State William H. Seward, the Civil War was the “irrepressible conflict.” It has also been deemed an unnecessary bloodletting brought on by arrogant extremists and blundering politicians. Regardless of opinions, in 1861 the nation faced the very real prospect of a war that could dissolve the union. Causes of the war were many and had developed over decades, but the immediate spark for the conflict came in consequence of South Carolina’s determination to secede from the Union—a result of Abraham Lincoln’s victory in the 1860 presidential election. South Carolina leaders had been waiting for an event to unite the South against antislavery forces. At a special convention called in South Carolina, a declaration was passed declaring that the United States of America was dissolved.
[Show full text]
Civil War Manuscripts
CIVIL WAR MANUSCRIPTS CIVIL WAR MANUSCRIPTS MANUSCRIPT READING ROW '•'" -"•••-' -'- J+l. MANUSCRIPT READING ROOM CIVIL WAR MANUSCRIPTS A Guide to Collections in the Manuscript Division of the Library of Congress Compiled by John R. Sellers LIBRARY OF CONGRESS WASHINGTON 1986 Cover: Ulysses S. Grant Title page: Benjamin F. Butler, Montgomery C. Meigs, Joseph Hooker, and David D. Porter Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Library of Congress. Manuscript Division. Civil War manuscripts. Includes index. Supt. of Docs, no.: LC 42:C49 1. United States—History—Civil War, 1861-1865— Manuscripts—Catalogs. 2. United States—History— Civil War, 1861-1865—Sources—Bibliography—Catalogs. 3. Library of Congress. Manuscript Division—Catalogs. I. Sellers, John R. II. Title. Z1242.L48 1986 [E468] 016.9737 81-607105 ISBN 0-8444-0381-4 The portraits in this guide were reproduced from a photograph album in the James Wadsworth family papers, Manuscript Division, Library of Congress. The album contains nearly 200 original photographs (numbered sequentially at the top), most of which were autographed by their subjects. The photo- graphs were collected by John Hay, an author and statesman who was Lin- coln's private secretary from 1860 to 1865. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. PREFACE To Abraham Lincoln, the Civil War was essentially a people's contest over the maintenance of a government dedi- cated to the elevation of man and the right of every citizen to an unfettered start in the race of life. President Lincoln believed that most Americans understood this, for he liked to boast that while large numbers of Army and Navy officers had resigned their commissions to take up arms against the government, not one common soldier or sailor was known to have deserted his post to fight for the Confederacy.
[Show full text]
Shenandoah at WAR
Shenandoah AT WAR If this Valley is lost, Virginia– Gen. is Thomas lost! J. “Stonewall” Jackson One story... a thousand voices. Visitors Guide to the Shenandoah Valley’s Civil War Story Shenandoah Valley Battlefields National Historic District Shenandoah Valley Battlefields National Historic District Explore the National Historic District Other Areas By degrees the whole line was thrown into confusion and I had no other recourse but to rally the Brigade on higher area by area... including Harpers Ferry, ground... There we took a stand and for hours successfully repulsed By degrees the whole line was Martinsburg, and thrown into confusion and I had no other recourse but to rally the Brigade on higher ground... There we took a stand and Winchester Charles Town Harpers Ferry including areas of Frederick and Clarke counties Page 40 for hours successfully repulsed Page 20 Signal Knob Winchester including Middletown, Strasburg, and Front Royal By degrees the whole line was thrown into confusion and I had no other recourse but to rally the Page 24 Brigade on higher ground... There we took a stand and for hours successfully repulsed By degrees the whole line was thrown into confusion and I had no other recourse but to rally the Brigade on higher ground... There we took New Market including Luray and areas of Page County a stand and for hours successfully repulsed By degrees the whole line was thrown into confusion and I had no Page 28 other recourse but to rally the Brigade on higher ground... There we took a stand and for hours successfully repulsed By degrees the whole line was thrown into confusion and I had no other recourse but to rally the Brigade on higher Rockingham ground..
[Show full text]
Microfilmed 2002 Information to Users
UMI MICROFILMED 2002 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may t>e from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing In this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. ProQuest Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 UMÏ A CONTINUATION OF POLITICS BY OTHER MEANS: UNION GENERALSHIP DURING THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Thomas Joseph Goss, B. S., M. A. ***** The Ohio State University 2001 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr.
[Show full text]