Of the President

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Of the President Aeronautics and Space Report of the President 1986 Activities \ NOTE TO READERS: ALL PRINTED PAGES ARE INCLUDED, UNNUMBERED BLANK PAGES DURING SCANNING AND QUALITY CONTROL CHECK HAVE BEEN DELETED Aeronautics and Space Report of the President 1986 Activities National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, D.C. 20546 Contents Page b3e Summary ............................. 1 Environmental Protection Agency ......... 115 Spacescience ....................... 3 Monitoring and Assessing the Communications .................... 6 Environment ...................... 115 Earth's Atmosphere, Environment and National Science Foundation ............. 119 Resources ......................... 7 Astronomical Sciences ................ 119 Space Transportation ................ 9 Atmospheric Sciences ................ 119 Commercial Use of Space ............. 10 Smithsonian Institution ................. 121 Space Tracking and Data Systems ...... 11 Space Sciences ...................... 121 Space Station ....................... 11 Atmospheric Sciences ................ 121 Aeronautics and Space Research and Space Technology .................... 121 Technology ........................ 12 Planetary Sciences .................. 121 National Aeronautics and Space Department of State .................... 123 Administration ....................... 17 Activities within the United Nations .... 123 Space Science ....................... 17 Communication Satellites ............. 124 Applications ........................ 25 Arms Control and Disarmament Agency .... 127 Space Transportation ................ 33 U.S. Space Arms Control Activities ..... 127 Commercial Use of Space ............. 37 Multilateral Discussions on Space Arms Space Station ....................... 39 Control .......................... 127 Space Tracking and Data Systems ...... 43 Space Policy ........................ 127 Space Research and Technology ........ 45 United State Information Agency ......... 129 Aeronautics Research and Technology ... 51 Voice of America .................... 129 Department of Defense .................. 61 Television Service ................... 129 Space Activities ..................... 61 Other .USUActivities. ............... 129 Aeronautical Activities ............... 66 Space and Aeronautics Support ........ 71 Appendixes Relations with NASA ................ 73 Department of Commerce ................ 75 A-1 U.S. Spacecraft Record ................... 131 Space Systems ...................... 75 A-2 World Record of Space Launches Successful Satellite Data Services ............... 77 in Attaining Earth Orbit or Beyond ...... 131 International Activities ............... 79 A-3 Successful U.S. Launches-1986 ........... 132 Research ........................... 80 B-1 US.-Launched Applications Satellites, 1980- Aeronautical Programs ............... 81 1986 ................................ 134 Department of Energy ................... 83 B-2 US.-Launched Scientific Satellites, 1980- Space Nuclear Power Systems ......... 83 1986 ................................ 136 Nuclear Test Detection ............... 85 B-3 US.-Launched Space Probes, 1975-1986 .... 137 Department of the Interior ............... 87 C U.S. and Soviet Manned Spaceflights, 1961- Remotely Sensed Data Acquisition and 1986 ................................ 138 Processing ........................ 87 D U.S. Space Launch Vehicles .............. 14.4 Digital Data Processing and E-1 Space Activities of the US. Transmission ...................... 88 Government: Remote Sensing Applications .......... 89 Historical Budget Summary- International Activities ............... 95 Budget Authority .................... 145 Department of Agriculture ............... 97 E-2 Space Activities Budget .................. 147 Remote Sensing Research ............. 97 E-3 Aeronautics Budget ..................... 147 Federal Communications Commission ...... 101 F-1 Presidential Commission on the Space Communications Satellites ............ 101 Shuttle Challenger Accident-Executive New Satellite Services ................ 103 Order ............................... 148 International Conference Activities ..... 104 F-2 Presidential Statement on Fourth Shuttle Department of Transportation ............ 105 Orbiter and Commercial Payloads ........ 149 Aviation Safety ..................... 105 Air Navigation and Air Traffic Control . 110 Ofice of Commercial Space Transportation .................... 112 the target date for resuming Shuttle flights. Summary Based upon a reduced flight rate, a 3-year projected manifest was issued that accommo- During 1986, advances that were made in dated the payload backlog as much as possi- the areas of aeronautics, space science and ble. In addition, the President announced his applications, and space exploration, involv- support of the construction of a vehicle to re- ing several federal agencies, demonstrated place Challenger, and of a new policy on the the Nation’s abiding commitment to improve commercial use of space that emphasized pri- the quality of life on Earth and to extend hu- vate sector launches of commercial satellites, man enterprise beyond Earth. However, the except for those that are uniquely suited to Space Shuttle Challenger accident, and the the Shuttle or have national security or for- subsequent investigation and recovery opera- eign policy implications. tions, were the dominant events of the year, affecting a broad range of national and inter- In 1986, expendable launch vehicles national space plans and policies. (ELV’s) continued to provide launch support to satellite users. Five launches were con- The year’s successful Space Shuttle mission ducted for the Department of Defense (DOD) began with the launch of flight 61-C on Jan- and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric uary 12, using the orbiter Columbia. The 6- Administration (NOAA) using Scout, Delta, day mission carried the Materials Science AtlasEentaur, and Atlas E/F vehicles. In ad- Laboratory; the first Hitchhiker payload-of- dition, NASA initiated studies on the need to opportunity carrier; the Infrared Imaging establish a Mixed Fleet Transportation Sys- Experiment; 13 Getaway Specials; and RCA’s tem that would consist of the Space Shuttle Satcom K-1 communications satellite was and existing or new ELV’s. deployed. One of two payload specialists on the flight was U.S. Representative Bill Nel- In lieu of using the Centaur G prime upper son who participated in a number of experi- stage to launch planetary payloads, the Iner- ments for the National Aeronautics and tial Upper Stage (a launch vehicle that fits Space Administration (NASA). into the Shuttle’s cargo bay) was selected for On January 28, Space Shuttle Challenger the Magellan, Galileo, and Ulysses planetary flight 51-L was launched at 11:38 a.m. missions. Aboard were Francis R. “Dick” Scobee, com- In the area of space exploration, Voyager 2 mander; Michael J. Smith, pilot; Judith A. became the first spacecraft to fly past Resnik, Ellison S. Onizuka, and Ronald E. Uranus, providing prime scientific data on McNair, mission specialists; and payload spe- that planetary body. In an unprecedented, co- cialists Gregory B. Jarvis, Hughes Aircraft ordinated effort, Halley’s Comet was studied Company, and Christa McAuliffe, the first extensively by scientists and astronomers teacher in space. Flight 51-L ended 73 sec- from around the world. Also, in the process of onds later in an explosive burn of hydrogen star formation, astronomers observed the and oxygen propellants that destroyed the stage where the collapsing object is closer to External Tank and exposed the spacecraft to attaining stellar dimensions than anything severe aerodynamic loads that caused com- previously observed; and the fastest known plete structural breakup. All seven crew spinning binary pulsar was discovered. members perished. Subsequently, President Reagan announced the formation of the Pres- The year 1986 marked the 25th anniver- idential Commission on the Space Shuttle sary of the use of Radioisotope Thermoelec- Challenger Accident to determine the proba- tric Generators (RTG’s). Through the years, ble cause and necessary corrective actions. RTG’s delivered by the Department of En- After conducting an extensive investigation, ergy to NASA and the DOD provided safe and the Commission made important recommen- highly reliable electric power sources that dations designed to insure the return to safe contributed to the success of some of the most ambitious and spectacular astronautical flight. NASA’s plan to implement the recom- mendations of the Commission was submit- events ever undertaken by the United States. ted to President Reagan on July 14. RTG’s aboard spacecraft studying the inter- planetary medium, Pioneer 10 and Pioneer After extensive studies of the entire Shut- 11, launched in 1972 and 1973, respectively, tle Transportation System program were con- and the Voyager 1and Voyager 2, launched in ducted, NASA announced February 1988 as 1977, are still operational. 1 Under a White House directive, NASA and ship of a mobile satellite system would be the DOD continued to examine technologies that best way to provide a variety of services to the would improve launch capabilities in the public. In addition, advances in technology post-1995 period. In addition, studies were resulted in new applications of satellite- initiated to examine options for new rocket delivered communications. The FCC granted engines, advanced propulsion recovery sys- approval to a company to construct, launch, tems, and
Recommended publications
  • Collezione Per Genova
    1958-1978: 20 anni di sperimentazioni spaziali in Occidente La collezione copre il ventennio 1958-1978 che è stato particolarmente importante nella storia della esplorazio- ne spaziale, in quanto ha posto le basi delle conoscenze tecnico-scientifiche necessarie per andare nello spa- zio in sicurezza e per imparare ad utilizzare le grandi potenzialità offerte dallo spazio per varie esigenze civili e militari. Nel clima di guerra fredda, lo spazio è stato fin dai primi tempi, utilizzato dagli Americani per tenere sotto con- trollo l’avversario e le sue dotazioni militari, in risposta ad analoghe misure adottate dai Sovietici. Per preparare le missioni umane nello spazio, era indispensabile raccogliere dati e conoscenze sull’alta atmo- sfera e sulle radiazioni che si incontrano nello spazio che circonda la Terra. Dopo la sfida lanciata da Kennedy, gli Americani dovettero anche prepararsi allo sbarco dell’uomo sulla Luna ed intensificarono gli sforzi per conoscere l’ambiente lunare. Fin dai primi anni, le sonde automatiche fecero compiere progressi giganteschi alla conoscenza del sistema solare. Ben presto si imparò ad utilizzare i satelliti per la comunicazione intercontinentale e il supporto alla navigazio- ne, per le previsioni meteorologiche, per l’osservazione della Terra. La Collezione testimonia anche i primi tentativi delle nuove “potenze spaziali” che si avvicinano al nuovo mon- do dei satelliti, che inizialmente erano monopolio delle due Superpotenze URSS e USA. L’Italia, con San Mar- co, diventò il terzo Paese al mondo a lanciare un proprio satellite e allestì a Malindi la prima base equatoriale, che fu largamente utilizzata dalla NASA. Alla fine degli anni ’60 anche l’Europa entrò attivamente nell’arena spaziale, lanciando i propri satelliti scientifici e di telecomunicazione dalla propria base equatoriale di Kourou.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbit Options for an Orion-Class Spacecraft Mission to a Near-Earth Object
    Orbit Options for an Orion-Class Spacecraft Mission to a Near-Earth Object by Nathan C. Shupe B.A., Swarthmore College, 2005 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences 2010 This thesis entitled: Orbit Options for an Orion-Class Spacecraft Mission to a Near-Earth Object written by Nathan C. Shupe has been approved for the Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences Daniel Scheeres Prof. George Born Assoc. Prof. Hanspeter Schaub Date The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. iii Shupe, Nathan C. (M.S., Aerospace Engineering Sciences) Orbit Options for an Orion-Class Spacecraft Mission to a Near-Earth Object Thesis directed by Prof. Daniel Scheeres Based on the recommendations of the Augustine Commission, President Obama has pro- posed a vision for U.S. human spaceflight in the post-Shuttle era which includes a manned mission to a Near-Earth Object (NEO). A 2006-2007 study commissioned by the Constellation Program Advanced Projects Office investigated the feasibility of sending a crewed Orion spacecraft to a NEO using different combinations of elements from the latest launch system architecture at that time. The study found a number of suitable mission targets in the database of known NEOs, and pre- dicted that the number of candidate NEOs will continue to increase as more advanced observatories come online and execute more detailed surveys of the NEO population.
    [Show full text]
  • Achievements of Hayabusa2: Unveiling the World of Asteroid by Interplanetary Round Trip Technology
    Achievements of Hayabusa2: Unveiling the World of Asteroid by Interplanetary Round Trip Technology Yuichi Tsuda Project Manager, Hayabusa2 Japan Aerospace ExplorationAgency 58th COPUOS, April 23, 2021 Lunar and Planetary Science Missions of Japan 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Future Plan Moon 2007 Kaguya 1990 Hiten SLIM Lunar-A × Venus 2010 Akatsuki 2018 Mio 1998 Nozomi × Planets Mercury (Mars) 2010 IKAROS Venus MMX Phobos/Mars 1985 Suisei 2014 Hayabusa2 Small Bodies Asteroid Ryugu 2003 Hayabusa 1985 Sakigake Asteroid Itokawa Destiny+ Comet Halley Comet Pheton 2 Hayabusa2 Mission ✓ Sample return mission to a C-type asteroid “Ryugu” ✓ 5.2 billion km interplanetary journey. Launch Earth Gravity Assist Ryugu Arrival MINERVA-II-1 Deployment Dec.3, 2014 Sep.21, 2018 Dec.3, 2015 Jun.27, 2018 MASCOT Deployment Oct.3, 2018 Ryugu Departure Nov.13.2019 Kinetic Impact Earth Return Second Dec.6, 2020 Apr.5, 2019 Target Markers Orbiting Touchdown Sep.16, 2019 Jul,11, 2019 First Touchdown Feb.22, 2019 MINERVA-II-2 Orbiting MD [D VIp srvlxp #534<# Oct.2, 2019 Hayabusa2 Spacecraft Overview Deployable Xband Xband Camera (DCAM3) HGA LGA Xband Solar Array MGA Kaba nd Ion Engine HGA Panel RCS thrusters ×12 ONC‐T, ONC‐W1 Star Trackers Near Infrared DLR MASCOT Spectrometer (NIRS3) Lander Thermal Infrared +Z Imager (TIR) Reentry Capsule +X MINERVA‐II Small Carry‐on +Z LIDAR ONC‐W2 +Y Rovers Impactor (SCI) +X Sampler Horn Target +Y Markers ×5 Launch Mass: 609kg Ion Engine: Total ΔV=3.2km/s, Thrust=5-28mN (variable), Specific Impulse=2800- 3000sec. (4 thrusters, mounted on two-axis gimbal) Chemical RCS: Bi-prop.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 – 2018 Recruitment Dates DISCLAIMER: Dates Subject to Change
    2017 – 2018 Recruitment Dates DISCLAIMER: Dates subject to change. Information is listed in alphabetical by chapter name. Bid Day dates are included as available. Recommendations when mailed should be labeled ATTN: Membership Coordinator. Recruitment Recommendations from alumna members in good standing must be received prior to the second round of Primary Recruitment, recommendations from collegiate members need to be received prior to the first round of Primary Recruitment. Recommendations may also be sent to any chapter participating in Continuous Open Bidding. Please email our Membership Growth Specialists at [email protected] with any questions. Designation University Name Dates Mailing Address Alpha Beta University of Michigan September 15, 17, 24, 25, 27, 1322 Hill Street 28, October 2, Ann Arbor, MI 48104 October 3 Bid Day Alpha Eta Dalhousie University September 11, 13, 15, 17, 34 Jarrett Lane, C/O Catherine Savoie Hammonds September 22 Bid Day Plains, NS B4B1M9, CAN Alpha Iota Baldwin Wallace University September 22-24, Constitution South East, 144 Tressel September 24 Bid Day Berea, OH 44017 Alpha Pi Wayne State University September 13-14, 17, Box 4 Student Center Building- Wayne State September 17 Bid Day University Detroit, MI 48202 Alpha Tau Edinboro University September 5, 12, 19, 26, 5255 Lake View Drive September 28 Bid Day Edinboro, PA 16412 Alpha Upsilon Central Michigan University September 8-10, 15 607 South Main Street September 16 Bid Day Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858 Beta Alpha Nebraska Wesleyan University
    [Show full text]
  • Securing Japan an Assessment of Japan´S Strategy for Space
    Full Report Securing Japan An assessment of Japan´s strategy for space Report: Title: “ESPI Report 74 - Securing Japan - Full Report” Published: July 2020 ISSN: 2218-0931 (print) • 2076-6688 (online) Editor and publisher: European Space Policy Institute (ESPI) Schwarzenbergplatz 6 • 1030 Vienna • Austria Phone: +43 1 718 11 18 -0 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: www.espi.or.at Rights reserved - No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose without permission from ESPI. Citations and extracts to be published by other means are subject to mentioning “ESPI Report 74 - Securing Japan - Full Report, July 2020. All rights reserved” and sample transmission to ESPI before publishing. ESPI is not responsible for any losses, injury or damage caused to any person or property (including under contract, by negligence, product liability or otherwise) whether they may be direct or indirect, special, incidental or consequential, resulting from the information contained in this publication. Design: copylot.at Cover page picture credit: European Space Agency (ESA) TABLE OF CONTENT 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background and rationales ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Study ................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Methodology
    [Show full text]
  • JAXA's Planetary Exploration Plan
    Planetary Exploration and International Collaboration Institute of Space and Astronautical Science Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency Yoshio Toukaku, Director for International Strategy and Coordination Naoya Ozaki, Assistant Professor, Dept of Spacecraft Engineering ISAS/JAXA September, 2019 The Path Japanese Planetary Exploration 1985 1995 2010 2018 Sakigake/ Nozomi Akatsuki BepiColombo Suisei MMO/MPO Comet flyby Planned and Venus Climate Mercury Orbiter launched Mars Orbiter orbiter Asteroid Sample Asteroid Sample Martian Moons Lunar probe Return Mission Return Mission explorer Hiten Hayabusa Hayabusa2 MMX 1992 2003 2014 2020s (TBD) Recent Science Missions HAYABUSA 2003-2010 HINODE(SOLAR-B)2006- KAGUYASELENE)2007-2009 Asteroid Explorer SolAr OBservAtion Lunar Exploration AKATSUKI 2010- Venus Meteorology IKAROS 2010 HisAki 2013 SolAr SAil PlAnetary atmosphere HAYABUSA2 2014-2020 Hitomi(ASTRO-H) 2016 ArAse (ERG) 2016 Asteroid Explorer X-Ray Astronomy Van Allen Belt proBe Hayabusa & Hayabusa 2 Asteroid Sample Return Missions “Hayabusa” spacecraft brought back the material of Asteroid Itokawa while establishing innovative ion engines. “Hayabusa2”, while utilizing the experience cultivated in “Hayabusa”, has arrived at the C type Asteroid Ryugu in order to elucidate the origin and evolution of the solar system and primordial materials that would have led to emergence of life. Hayabusa Hayabusa2 Target Itokawa Ryugu Launch 2003 2014 Arrival 2005 2018 Return 2010 2020 ©JAXA Asteroid Ryugu 6 Martian Moons eXploration (MMX) Sample return from Marian moon for detailed analysis. Strategic L-Class A key element in the ISAS roadmap for small body exploration. Phase A n Science Objectives 1. Origin of Mars satellites. - Captured asteroids? - Accreted debris resulting from a giant impact? 2. Preparatory processes enabling to the habitability of the solar system.
    [Show full text]
  • NEC Space Business
    Japan Space industry Workshop in ILA Berlin Airshow 2014 NEC Space Business May 22nd, 2014 NEC Corporation Kentaro (Kent) Sakagami (Mr.) General Manager Satellite Systems and Equipment, Global Business Unit E-mail: [email protected] NEC Corporate Profile Company Name: NEC Corporation Established: July 17, 1899 Kaoru Yano Nobuhiro Endo Chairman of the Board: Kaoru Yano President: Nobuhiro Endo Capital: ¥ 397.2 billion (As of Mar. 31, 2013) Consolidated Net Sales: ¥ 3,071.6 billion (FY ended Mar. 31, 2013) Employees: 102,375 (As of Mar. 31, 2013) Consolidated Subsidiaries: 270 (As of Mar. 31, 2013) Financial results are based on accounting principles generally accepted in Japan Page 2 © NEC Corporation 2014 NEC Worldwide: “One NEC” formation in 5 regions Marketing & Service affiliates 77 in 32 countries Manufacturing affiliates 8 in 5 countries Liaison Offices 7 in 7 countries Branch Offices 7 in 7 countries Laboratories 4 in 3 countries North America Greater China NECJ EMEA APAC Latin America (As of Apr. 1, 2014) Page 3 © NEC Corporation 2014 NEC in EMEA 1 NEC in Germany NEC Deutschland GmbH NEC Display Solutions Europe NEC Laboratories Europe (Internal division of NEC Europe Ltd.) NEC Tokin Europe NEC Scandinavia AB in Espoo, 2 NEC in Netherlands Finland NEC Logistics Europe NEC Nederland B.V. NEC Neva Communications Systems NEC Scandinavia AB in Oslo, Norway NEC in the U.K. 3 NEC Scandinavia AB NEC Europe Ltd. NEC Capital (UK) plc NEC in the UK NEC Technologies (UK) NEC in Netherlands NEC Telecom MODUS Limited 3 2 NEC (UK) Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BATTLE for DOMINANCE on AIRLINERS Page 18
    May 2015 THE BATTLE FOR DOMINANCE ON AIRLINERS Page 18 DARPA’s tailless cargo drone/10 Cosmonaut diary/38 A PUBLICATION OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS COSMONAUT Anatoly Berezovoy (Russian Federal Space Agency) Roscosmos DIARIES 38 AEROSPACE AMERICA/MAY 2015 Copyright 2015 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Soviet cosmonaut Anatoly Berezovoy made only one space flight during his career, but it was one for the books. His 1982 mission, the first expedition to the Salyut 7 space station, lasted a then-record of 211 days. That record was broken 16 months later by Leonid Kizim, Vladimir Soloviev and Oleg Atkov, the third crew aboard the Salyut-7, whose mission lasted 237 days. During much of Berezovoy’s time in space — as well as afterwards — he chronicled his observations on paper. After Berezovoy died last September at age 72, his widow, Lidia Berezovaya, contacted Aerospace America through her husband’s longtime interpreter, Olga Tunison. Berezovaya and Tunison wanted to know if we were interested in publishing excerpts of his writings in English. We were very inter- ested, because the writings give a fascinating glimpse of a budding Soviet human space flight pro- gram, from the physical travails of learning to live in space to the social breakthroughs required for men and women to work together effectively in space. As commander, Berezovoy lifted off with flight engineer Valentin Lebedev on May 13, 1982 aboard the Soyuz rocket bound for Salyut 7, the final spacecraft in the Salyut series before the launch of the Mir space station.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 2 Almaz, Salyut, And
    Part 2 Almaz/Salyut/Mir largely concerned with assembly in 12, 1964, Chelomei called upon his Part 2 Earth orbit of a vehicle for circumlu- staff to develop a military station for Almaz, Salyut, nar flight, but also described a small two to three cosmonauts, with a station made up of independently design life of 1 to 2 years. They and Mir launched modules. Three cosmo- designed an integrated system: a nauts were to reach the station single-launch space station dubbed aboard a manned transport spacecraft Almaz (“diamond”) and a Transport called Siber (or Sever) (“north”), Logistics Spacecraft (Russian 2.1 Overview shown in figure 2-2. They would acronym TKS) for reaching it (see live in a habitation module and section 3.3). Chelomei’s three-stage Figure 2-1 is a space station family observe Earth from a “science- Proton booster would launch them tree depicting the evolutionary package” module. Korolev’s Vostok both. Almaz was to be equipped relationships described in this rocket (a converted ICBM) was with a crew capsule, radar remote- section. tapped to launch both Siber and the sensing apparatus for imaging the station modules. In 1965, Korolev Earth’s surface, cameras, two reentry 2.1.1 Early Concepts (1903, proposed a 90-ton space station to be capsules for returning data to Earth, 1962) launched by the N-1 rocket. It was and an antiaircraft cannon to defend to have had a docking module with against American attack.5 An ports for four Soyuz spacecraft.2, 3 interdepartmental commission The space station concept is very old approved the system in 1967.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Commercial Launch Vehicles
    Fourth Quarter 2001 Quarterly Launch Report 8 The Evolution of Commercial Launch Vehicles INTRODUCTION LAUNCH VEHICLE ORIGINS On February 14, 1963, a Delta launch vehi- The initial development of launch vehicles cle placed the Syncom 1 communications was an arduous and expensive process that satellite into geosynchronous orbit (GEO). occurred simultaneously with military Thirty-five years later, another Delta weapons programs; launch vehicle and launched the Bonum 1 communications missile developers shared a large portion of satellite to GEO. Both launches originated the expenses and technology. The initial from Launch Complex 17, Pad B, at Cape generation of operational launch vehicles in Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida. both the United States and the Soviet Union Bonum 1 weighed 21 times as much as the was derived and developed from the oper- earlier Syncom 1 and the Delta launch vehicle ating country's military ballistic missile that carried it had a maximum geosynchro- programs. The Russian Soyuz launch vehicle nous transfer orbit (GTO) capacity 26.5 is a derivative of the first Soviet interconti- times greater than that of the earlier vehicle. nental ballistic missile (ICBM) and the NATO-designated SS-6 Sapwood. The Launch vehicle performance continues to United States' Atlas and Titan launch vehicles constantly improve, in large part to meet the were developed from U.S. Air Force's first demands of an increasing number of larger two ICBMs of the same names, while the satellites. Current vehicles are very likely to initial Delta (referred to in its earliest be changed from last year's versions and are versions as Thor Delta) was developed certainly not the same as ones from five from the Thor intermediate range ballistic years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Manned Space Flights Spacecalc
    CBS News Manned Space Flights Current through STS-117 Table of Manned Space Flights SpaceCalc Total: 260 Crew Launch Land Duration By Robert A. Braeunig* Vostok 1 Yuri Gagarin 04/12/61 04/12/61 1h:48m First manned space flight (1 orbit). MR 3 Alan Shepard 05/05/61 05/05/61 15m:22s First American in space (suborbital). Freedom 7. MR 4 Virgil Grissom 07/21/61 07/21/61 15m:37s Second suborbital flight; spacecraft sank, Grissom rescued. Liberty Bell 7. Vostok 2 Guerman Titov 08/06/61 08/07/61 1d:01h:18m First flight longer than 24 hours (17 orbits). MA 6 John Glenn 02/20/62 02/20/62 04h:55m First American in orbit (3 orbits); telemetry falsely indicated heatshield unlatched. Friendship 7. MA 7 Scott Carpenter 05/24/62 05/24/62 04h:56m Initiated space flight experiments; manual retrofire error caused 250 mile landing overshoot. Aurora 7. Vostok 3 Andrian Nikolayev 08/11/62 08/15/62 3d:22h:22m First twinned flight, with Vostok 4. Vostok 4 Pavel Popovich 08/12/62 08/15/62 2d:22h:57m First twinned flight. On first orbit came within 3 miles of Vostok 3. MA 8 Walter Schirra 10/03/62 10/03/62 09h:13m Developed techniques for long duration missions (6 orbits); closest splashdown to target to date (4.5 miles). Sigma 7. MA 9 Gordon Cooper 05/15/63 05/16/63 1d:10h:20m First U.S. evaluation of effects of one day in space (22 orbits); performed manual reentry after systems failure, landing 4 miles from target.
    [Show full text]
  • ROCKETS and MISSILES Recent Titles in Greenwood Technographies
    ROCKETS AND MISSILES Recent Titles in Greenwood Technographies Sound Recording: The Life Story of a Technology David L. Morton Jr. Firearms: The Life Story of a Technology Roger Pauly Cars and Culture: The Life Story of a Technology Rudi Volti Electronics: The Life Story of a Technology David L. Morton Jr. ROCKETS AND MISSILES 1 THE LIFE STORY OF A TECHNOLOGY A. Bowdoin Van Riper GREENWOOD TECHNOGRAPHIES GREENWOOD PRESS Westport, Connecticut • London Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Van Riper, A. Bowdoin. Rockets and missiles : the life story of a technology / A. Bowdoin Van Riper. p. cm.—(Greenwood technographies, ISSN 1549–7321) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0–313–32795–5 (alk. paper) 1. Rocketry (Aeronautics)—History. 2. Ballistic missiles—History. I. Title. II. Series. TL781.V36 2004 621.43'56—dc22 2004053045 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data is available. Copyright © 2004 by A. Bowdoin Van Riper All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced, by any process or technique, without the express written consent of the publisher. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 2004053045 ISBN: 0–313–32795–5 ISSN: 1549–7321 First published in 2004 Greenwood Press, 88 Post Road West,Westport, CT 06881 An imprint of Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. www.greenwood.com Printed in the United States of America The paper used in this book complies with the Permanent Paper Standard issued by the National Information Standards Organization (Z39.48–1984). 10987654321 For Janice P. Van Riper who let a starstruck kid stay up long past his bedtime to watch Neil Armstrong take “one small step” Contents Series Foreword ix Acknowledgments xi Timeline xiii 1.
    [Show full text]