DOCSLIB.ORG

ROCKETS and MISSILES Recent Titles in Greenwood Technographies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ROCKETS and MISSILES Recent Titles in Greenwood Technographies ROCKETS AND MISSILES Recent Titles in Greenwood Technographies Sound Recording: The Life Story of a Technology David L. Morton Jr. Firearms: The Life Story of a Technology Roger Pauly Cars and Culture: The Life Story of a Technology Rudi Volti Electronics: The Life Story of a Technology David L. Morton Jr. ROCKETS AND MISSILES 1 THE LIFE STORY OF A TECHNOLOGY A. Bowdoin Van Riper GREENWOOD TECHNOGRAPHIES GREENWOOD PRESS Westport, Connecticut • London Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Van Riper, A. Bowdoin. Rockets and missiles : the life story of a technology / A. Bowdoin Van Riper. p. cm.—(Greenwood technographies, ISSN 1549–7321) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0–313–32795–5 (alk. paper) 1. Rocketry (Aeronautics)—History. 2. Ballistic missiles—History. I. Title. II. Series. TL781.V36 2004 621.43'56—dc22 2004053045 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data is available. Copyright © 2004 by A. Bowdoin Van Riper All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced, by any process or technique, without the express written consent of the publisher. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 2004053045 ISBN: 0–313–32795–5 ISSN: 1549–7321 First published in 2004 Greenwood Press, 88 Post Road West,Westport, CT 06881 An imprint of Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. www.greenwood.com Printed in the United States of America The paper used in this book complies with the Permanent Paper Standard issued by the National Information Standards Organization (Z39.48–1984). 10987654321 For Janice P. Van Riper who let a starstruck kid stay up long past his bedtime to watch Neil Armstrong take “one small step” Contents Series Foreword ix Acknowledgments xi Timeline xiii 1. Introduction 1 2. The Age of Black Powder, 1000–1900 7 3. The Birth of Modern Rocketry,1900–1942 25 4. Rockets in World War II, 1939–1945 41 5. Rockets for Research, 1945–1960 57 6. Ballistic Missiles and the Cold War, 1945–1990 71 7. Rockets to the Moon, 1960–1975 93 8. Tactical Missiles in the Cold War, 1950–1990 111 9. Spaceflight Becomes Routine, 1970–Present 125 10. Missiles after the Cold War, 1990–Present 139 11. Conclusion:What Next? 155 viii Contents Glossary 161 Further Reading 165 Index 169 Series Foreword In today’s world, technology plays an integral role in the daily life of peo- ple of all ages. It affects where we live, how we work, how we interact with each other, and what we aspire to accomplish. To help students and the general public better understand how technology and society interact, Greenwood has developed Greenwood Technographies, a series of short, acces- sible books that trace the histories of these technologies while document- ing how these technologies have become so vital to our lives. Each volume of the Greenwood Technographies series tells the biography or “life story” of a particularly important technology. Each life story traces the technology from its “ancestors” (or antecedent technologies), through its early years (either its invention or development) and rise to prominence, to its final decline, obsolescence, or ubiquity. Just as a good biography combines an analysis of an individual’s personal life with a description of the subject’s impact on the broader world, each volume in the Greenwood Technographies se- ries combines a discussion of technical developments with a description of the technology’s effect on the broader fabric of society and culture—and vice versa. The technologies covered in the series run the gamut from those that have been around for centuries—firearms and the printed book, for example—to recent inventions that have rapidly taken over the mod- ern world, such as electronics and the computer. While the emphasis is on a factual discussion of the development of x Series Foreword the technology,these books are also fun to read. The history of technology is full of fascinating tales that both entertain and illuminate. The authors— all experts in their fields—make the life story of technology come alive, while also providing readers with a profound understanding of the rela- tionship of science, technology,and society. Acknowledgments The greatest debt I have incurred in writing this book is, unfortunately,one that I cannot fully acknowledge. Rockets and Missiles is a brief introduction to a sprawling topic. It is, therefore, a synthesis of knowledge gathered and conclusions drawn by others. It is also part of a series that, by design, uses formal references only to acknowledge direct quotations. I have turned, in the course of researching and writing Rockets and Missiles, to the published work of countless other scholars. The books, articles, and web sites on which I relied most heavily are noted—along with selected others—in the Further Reading section at the end of this book. A heartfelt “thank you” is all I can offer to the authors of the rest. Other debts are, happily,more easily acknowledged. The staff of the Lawrence V. Johnson Library of Southern Polytechnic State University was cheerfully unflappable in the face of my frequent re- quests for obscure materials. Leigh Hall of the Interlibrary Loan Depart- ment deserves special thanks. The staffs of the Cobb County Public Library System and the libraries of Emory University and the Georgia Institute of Technology also aided my search for “just the right material” on countless rocket-related topics. Many times in the course of this project I benefited from informal in- put from fellow scholars. I am especially grateful—for references suggested, opinions critiqued, experience shared, and misunderstandings clarified—to xii Acknowledgments Amy Foster, Slava Guerevich, John Krige, Roger Launius, Frederick Ord- way, Asif Siddiqi, and Kristen Starr. Kevin Downing, who conceived the Greenwood Technographies series and invited me to be part of it, played a critical role in the initial shaping of this book. The scope, organization, and approach of Rockets and Missiles all re- flect his valuable input. He is, to paraphrase Gilbert and Sullivan, “the very model of a modern scholarly editor,” and it has been a pleasure to work with him. The editorial and production staffs at Greenwood Press have been both friendly and efficient—a combination of which every writer dreams. Finally,as always, I owe a considerable debt to Julie, Joe, and Katie. Julie cheerfully accepted the domestic chaos that comes with writing a book and, once again, gave me reason to reflect on the joys of being married to a fellow historian of science and technology. Joe and his friends, though they may not have known it, became the faces on the “target audience” I kept in mind as I wrote. Katie buoyed me with her enthusiasm and, with a single sentence—“You’re writing a book about rockets?!”—made it all seem worthwhile. Timeline Before 1100 CE Gunpowder invented in China. Mid-1100s Probable first use of military rockets by the Chinese. Mid-1200s Probable first use of military rockets by Arabs and Europeans. Around 1300 First detailed, written descriptions of rocket technology appear in European and Arabic manuscripts. Around 1400 Rocket technology known and used in all major Eurasian civi- lizations. Mid-1600s Rockets appear in military manuals such as Artis Magnae Ar- tilliae (Europe) and Wu Pei Chih (China). 1780–1799 Indian troops use rockets against the British in the Mysore Wars. 1805 William Congreve adapts Indian rocket technology for European use. 1805–1815 British troops use Congreve rockets against Danes, French, and Americans. 1820s Congreve-type rockets adapted for use in lifesaving and whaling. 1840 William Hale invents the first spin-stabilized (stickless) rocket. xiv Timeline 1870s Black powder rockets begin to decline as “tube” artillery improves. 1903 Konstantin Tsiolkovsky describes multistage, liquid-propellant rockets in his paper “Exploring Space with Reactive Devices.” 1919 Robert Goddard, unaware of Tsiolkovsky’s work, describes liquid-propellant rockets in “On a Method of Reaching Extreme Altitudes.” 1923 Hermann Oberth, unaware of Tsiolkovsky or Goddard, describes liquid-propellant rockets in Die Rakete zu den Planetenraum (The Rocket into Planetary Space). 1926 Goddard builds and flies the first liquid-propellant rocket. 1925–1935 Amateur rocket societies founded in the United States, USSR, and Germany. Late 1930s Civilian engineers backed by government funding invent storable liquid propellants, improved solid propellants, and other key technologies. 1939–1945 World War II:revival of rocket artillery,first use of guided missiles. Late 1945 Soviet and American rocket engineers, assisted by German émi- grés, begin building and testing high-altitude research rockets. 1947 Rocket-powered Bell X-1 exceeds the speed of sound in level flight. 1956 First warplane armed only with missiles becomes operational. 1957 Launch of Sputnik I, the first artificial satellite to orbit the Earth. 1957–1958 First IRBMs become operational. 1958 First successful use of air-to-air missiles in combat (Taiwan ver- sus China). 1958–1960 First ICBMs become operational. China acquires ballistic missile technology from the USSR. 1960 First missile-carrying submarines become operational. 1961 Launch of Vostok I, the first manned spacecraft to orbit the Earth. First successful launch of a silo-based missile. 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis brings United States and USSR close to nuclear war. Timeline xv 1964 First successful test of an antiballistic missile (by the United States). 1964–1973 Vietnam War: first sustained use of surface-to-air, air-to-air, and air-to-surface guided missiles in combat. 1967 (Apr) First manned test flight of the Soyuz spacecraft. 1967 (Nov) First test flight of the Saturn V, the largest space launch vehicle ever built. 1969 (Jan) First manned test flight of the complete Apollo spacecraft. 1969 (Jul) Eagle, an Apollo LM, makes the first manned landing on the moon. 1970 United States develops its first MIRVs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Master Table of All Deep Space, Lunar, and Planetary Probes, 1958–2000 Official Name Spacecraft / 1958 “Pioneer” Mass[Luna] No
    Deep Space Chronicle: Master Table of All Deep Space, Lunar, and Planetary Probes, 1958–2000 Official Spacecraft / Mass Launch Date / Launch Place / Launch Vehicle / Nation / Design & Objective Outcome* Name No. Time Pad No. Organization Operation 1958 “Pioneer” Able 1 38 kg 08-17-58 / 12:18 ETR / 17A Thor-Able I / 127 U.S. AFBMD lunar orbit U [Luna] Ye-1 / 1 c. 360 kg 09-23-58 / 09:03:23 NIIP-5 / 1 Luna / B1-3 USSR OKB-1 lunar impact U Pioneer Able 2 38.3 kg 10-11-58 / 08:42:13 ETR / 17A Thor-Able I / 130 U.S. NASA / AFBMD lunar orbit U [Luna] Ye-1 / 2 c. 360 kg 10-11-58 / 23:41:58 NIIP-5 / 1 Luna / B1-4 USSR OKB-1 lunar impact U Pioneer 2 Able 3 39.6 kg 11-08-58 / 07:30 ETR / 17A Thor-Able I / 129 U.S. NASA / AFBMD lunar orbit U [Luna] Ye-1 / 3 c. 360 kg 12-04-58 / 18:18:44 NIIP-5 / 1 Luna / B1-5 USSR OKB-1 lunar impact U Pioneer 3 - 5.87 kg 12-06-58 / 05:44:52 ETR / 5 Juno II / AM-11 U.S. NASA / ABMA lunar flyby U 1959 Luna 1 Ye-1 / 4 361.3 kg 01-02-59 / 16:41:21 NIIP-5 / 1 Luna / B1-6 USSR OKB-1 lunar impact P Master Table of All Deep Space, Lunar, andPlanetary Probes1958–2000 ofAllDeepSpace,Lunar, Master Table Pioneer 4 - 6.1 kg 03-03-59 / 05:10:45 ETR / 5 Juno II / AM-14 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Collezione Per Genova
    1958-1978: 20 anni di sperimentazioni spaziali in Occidente La collezione copre il ventennio 1958-1978 che è stato particolarmente importante nella storia della esplorazio- ne spaziale, in quanto ha posto le basi delle conoscenze tecnico-scientifiche necessarie per andare nello spa- zio in sicurezza e per imparare ad utilizzare le grandi potenzialità offerte dallo spazio per varie esigenze civili e militari. Nel clima di guerra fredda, lo spazio è stato fin dai primi tempi, utilizzato dagli Americani per tenere sotto con- trollo l’avversario e le sue dotazioni militari, in risposta ad analoghe misure adottate dai Sovietici. Per preparare le missioni umane nello spazio, era indispensabile raccogliere dati e conoscenze sull’alta atmo- sfera e sulle radiazioni che si incontrano nello spazio che circonda la Terra. Dopo la sfida lanciata da Kennedy, gli Americani dovettero anche prepararsi allo sbarco dell’uomo sulla Luna ed intensificarono gli sforzi per conoscere l’ambiente lunare. Fin dai primi anni, le sonde automatiche fecero compiere progressi giganteschi alla conoscenza del sistema solare. Ben presto si imparò ad utilizzare i satelliti per la comunicazione intercontinentale e il supporto alla navigazio- ne, per le previsioni meteorologiche, per l’osservazione della Terra. La Collezione testimonia anche i primi tentativi delle nuove “potenze spaziali” che si avvicinano al nuovo mon- do dei satelliti, che inizialmente erano monopolio delle due Superpotenze URSS e USA. L’Italia, con San Mar- co, diventò il terzo Paese al mondo a lanciare un proprio satellite e allestì a Malindi la prima base equatoriale, che fu largamente utilizzata dalla NASA. Alla fine degli anni ’60 anche l’Europa entrò attivamente nell’arena spaziale, lanciando i propri satelliti scientifici e di telecomunicazione dalla propria base equatoriale di Kourou.
    [Show full text]
  • Brazil's Accession to the Mtcr
    Wyn Q. Bowen Report: BRAZIL’S ACCESSION TO THE MTCR by Wyn Q. Bowen Wyn Q. Bowen is a Senior Research Associate of the Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies. He is also a Ph.D. candidate in International Relations at the University of Birmingham and is completing a dissertation on U.S. missile nonproliferation policy during the Bush administration. n October 1995, Brazil’s membership in the Mis- the design and construction of a center from which to sile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) was ap- launch the VLS at Alcantara (CLA), in the northern proved unanimously at the regime’s 10th plenary state of Maranhao.1 The VLS was to be developed us- I 2 meeting in Bonn, Germany. Acceptance in the MTCR ing technology derived from the Sonda rocket series. was the outcome of a series of policy changes initi- The central role of the military in the MECB during ated by Brazil in early 1994 to address international the 1980s, however, cast doubt over the true nature of missile proliferation concerns. This report consid- the space program. The Brazilian Commission for Space ers the past Brazilian rocket and missile activities that Activities (COBAE), responsible for overseeing and generated these concerns and the policy changes running the MECB, was chaired by the armed forces which Brazil undertook to gain acceptance in the chief of staff.3 The prominent role of the Air Force’s MTCR. The implications of Brazil’s membership in Aerospace Technical Center (CTA) in developing the the regime are also considered, along with some of VLS also suggested the military might have other rea- the missile proliferation concerns which continue to sons for developing space launch vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Montana Report of the President 1927-1928 University of Montana (Missoula, Mont.)
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana University of Montana Report of the President, University of Montana Publications 1895-1968 1-1-1928 University of Montana Report of the President 1927-1928 University of Montana (Missoula, Mont.). Office of ther P esident Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/presidentsreports_asc Recommended Citation University of Montana (Missoula, Mont.). Office of the President, "University of Montana Report of the President 1927-1928" (1928). University of Montana Report of the President, 1895-1968. 33. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/presidentsreports_asc/33 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Montana Publications at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Montana Report of the President, 1895-1968 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. t O f f III STATE UNIVERSITY of MONTANA * * * PRESIDENT’ S ANNUAL REPORT 1927 - 1928 ********* ******* ***** * * * * TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR PRESIDENT’ S RE -ORT 1927-1928 A. President’ s Report ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page 1 B . Reports of Administrative Officers I. Dean of the Faculty ----------------------------------------------------------------------- " 9 I I. (a) Dean of Men (Not Reported) (b) Dean of Yvomen — " 10 III.(a) Registrar
    [Show full text]
  • Iran, Terrorism, and Weapons of Mass Destruction
    Iran, Terrorism, and Weapons of Mass Destruction Prepared Remarks for the hearing entitled “WMD Terrorism and Proliferant States” before the Subcommittee on the Prevention of Nuclear and Biological Attacks of the Homeland Security Committee September 8, 2005 Dr. Daniel Byman Director, Center for Peace and Security Studies, Georgetown University Senior Fellow, Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution E-mail: [email protected] Iran, Terrorism, and Weapons of Mass Destruction Chairman Linder, Members of the Committee, and Committee staff, I am grateful for this opportunity to speak before you today. I am speaking today as a Professor in the Georgetown University Security Studies Program and as a non-resident Senior Fellow at the Brookings’ Saban Center for Middle East Policy. My remarks are solely my own opinion: they do not reflect my past work for the intelligence community, the 9/11 Commission, the U.S. Congress, or other branches of the U.S. government. Since the Islamic Revolution in 1979, Iran has been one of the world’s most active sponsors of terrorism. Tehran has armed, trained, financed, inspired, organized, and otherwise supported dozens of violent groups over the years. Iran has backed not only groups in its Persian Gulf neighborhood, but also terrorists and radicals in Lebanon, the Palestinian territories, Bosnia, the Philippines, and elsewhere.1 This support remains strong even today. It comes as no surprise then, twenty five years after the revolution, the U.S. State Department still considers Iran “the most active state sponsor of terrorism.”2 Yet despite Iran’s very real support for terrorism today, I contend that it is not likely to transfer chemical, biological, nuclear, or radiological weapons to terrorists for three major reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace Facts and Figures 1983/84
    Aerospace Facts and Figures 1983/84 AEROSPACE INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. 1725 DeSales Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 Published by Aviation Week & Space Technology A MCGRAW-HILL PUBLICATION 1221 Avenue of the Americas New York, N.Y. 10020 (212) 997-3289 $9.95 Per Copy Copyright, July 1983 by Aerospace Industries Association o' \merica, Inc. · Library of Congress Catalog No. 46-25007 2 Compiled by Economic Data Service Aerospace Research Center Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. 1725 DeSales Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 429-4600 Director Research Center Virginia C. Lopez Manager Economic Data Service Janet Martinusen Editorial Consultant James J. Haggerty 3 ,- Acknowledgments Air Transport Association of America Battelle Memorial Institute Civil Aeronautics Board Council of Economic Advisers Export-Import Bank of the United States Exxon International Company Federal Trade Commission General Aviation Manufacturers Association International Civil Aviation Organization McGraw-Hill Publications Company National Aer~mautics and Space Administration National Science Foundation Office of Management and Budget U.S. Departments of Commerce (Bureau of the Census, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Bureau of Industrial Economics) Defense (Comptroller; Directorate for Information, Operations and Reports; Army, Navy, Air Force) Labor (Bureau of Labor Statistics) Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration The cover and chapter art throughout this edition of Aerospace Facts and Figures feature computer-inspired graphics-hot an original theme in the contemporary business environment, but one particularly relevant to the aerospace industry, which spawned the large-scale development and application of computers, and conti.nues to incorpora~e computer advances in all aspects of its design and manufacture of aircraft, mis­ siles, and space products.
    [Show full text]
  • Krinkelt–Rocherath in Belgium on December 17–18, 1944 During the German Ardennes Offensive
    CONTENTS Introduction Chronology Design and Development Technical Specifications The Combatants The Strategic Situation Combat Statistics and Analysis Aftermath Further Reading INTRODUCTION The rocket-propelled grenade launcher (RPG) has become a ubiquitous weapon on the modern battlefield; and all of these weapons trace their lineage back to the American 2.36in rocket launcher, better known as the bazooka. The bazooka was the serendipitous conjunction of two new technologies: the shaped-charge antitank warhead and the shoulder-fired rocket launcher. This book looks at the development of this iconic weapon, and traces its combat use on the World War II battlefield. One of the widespread myths to have emerged about German tank design during World War II was the notion that German sideskirt armor was developed in response to the bazooka, and its British equivalent, the PIAT (Projector Infantry Antitank). American and British troops began encountering the new versions of German armored vehicles with extra armor shields in 1944, and so presumed that this new feature was in response to the Allied shaped-charge weapons. The shields received a variety of names including “bazooka shields,” “bazooka pants,” and “PIAT shields.” In reality, their development was not a response to Allied shaped-charge weapons, for most German innovations in tank technology during the war years were prompted by developments on the Eastern Front. This book examines the real story behind the bazooka shields. It also traces the many specialized devices developed by the Wehrmacht in World War II to deal with the threat of infantry close-attack weapons. A remarkable variety of curious devices was developed including a wood paste to defend against antitank charges, and a machine gun with a special curved barrel to allow armored vehicle crews to defend themselves from within the protective armor of their vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Erdogan Warns Syria to Back Off from Turkish Outposts
    Gulf / Middle East / Africa Thursday, February 6, 2020 07 Avalanches kill nearly 40 in eastern Turkey AFP overall toll to 38. Eight people be under the snow. Interior Minister Suley- Local media reported that ANKARA had been rescued alive from The rescuers had been man Soylu said rescuers had residents in nearby areas also the first avalanche. searching for two people from paused overnight and re- joined the rescue efforts in an AT least 33 people were killed Television images showed Tuesday’s incident, AFAD’s sumed their efforts Wednes- area difficult to reach in harsh in eastern Turkey on Wednes- dozens of people scrambling up Van province chairman Os- day morning to find the last winter conditions. day by a second avalanche the mountains, digging through man Ucar told reporters from two people. Television images showed which buried a team of rescu- snow in blizzards to find those his hospital bed. Authorities were alerted to dozens of people scrambling up ers searching for people hit by trapped under the snow. He was among those in- the first avalanche when snow- the mountains, digging through the first the day before. The number of those in- jured including former rul- clearing vehicle operator Ba- snow in blizzards to find those The bodies of 33 rescue jured was 53 in total after the ing party MP for Van, Gulsen hattin Karagulle escaped from caught under the snow. workers and civilians were second avalanche hit after Orhan, who now advises Presi- his snow-covered machine A special military plane discovered in Van province, 0900 GMT between Bahc- dent Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Dauntless
    Operation Dauntless Unit Preview: Self-Propelled Artillery Both the British and German players have a small number of self-propelled artillery units available in Operation Dauntless. This unit preview will briefly examine these sparse but handy units. British Self-Propelled Artillery The British 147th (Essex Yeomanry) Field Regiment consists of three batteries of four each "Sexton" self-propelled 25-pounder guns (shown below). As part of the 8th Armoured Brigade in Operation Dauntless, these are the only artillery units which are always available to the British player. These SP guns had a maximum gun elevation of 35 degrees, yielding a maximum range of 11,000 yards (about 25-26 Operation Dauntless map hexes). Unlike traditional artillery, these units can both move and fire in a single turn, with a respectable 12 Movement Allowance (up to 24 road hexes per turn). "The 147th fought as a self-propelled artillery unit using 25-pounder field guns mounted on Sherman tank chassis." (from the Essex Yeomanry Association website at http://www.essex-yeomanry.org.uk/in-the-news/69-military-units-of-essex-4.html ). "147 (Essex Yeomanry) Regiment was converted to 25 pounder guns and landed on D Day to fight through Germany." (from the History section of the British Army website at http://www.army.mod.uk/signals/organisation/8830.aspx ). Note that there are 3 variants of the Sexton, but only the Sexton II was based on a Grizzly (M4A1 Sherman) hull, so these vehicles were the Sexton II's. First built in 1943, Sextons were available in the field from June '44 onward.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unique Evolutionary Dynamics of the SARS-Cov-2 Delta Variant
    medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.05.21261642; this version posted August 7, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . The unique evolutionary dynamics of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant Adi Stern*†1,2, Shay Fleishon*3, Talia Kustin1,2, Michal Mandelboim3,4, Oran Erster3, Israel Consortium of SARS-CoV-2 sequencingY, Ella Mendelson3,4, Orna Mor3,4, Neta S. Zuckerman†3 1 The Shmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer Research, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 2 Edmond J. Safra Center for Bioinformatics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel 3 Central Virology Laboratory, Public Health Services, Ministry of Health and Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel. 4 School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel- Aviv, Israel. * Co-equal authorship † Corresponding authors Y Israel Consortium of SARS-CoV-2 sequencing: Neta S. Zuckerman, Orna Mor, Efrat Dahan Bucris, Michal Mandelboim, Danit Sofer, Dana Bar-Ilan, Miranda Geva, Omer Asraf, Oran Erster, Gideon Rechavi, Efrat Glick-Saar, Nir Rainy, Chen Weiner, Reut Sorek-Abramovich, Yevgeni Yegorov, Anna Vishnevsky, Patricia Benveniste-Lekovitz, Abu Hamad Ramzia, Adina Bar Chaim, Ella Mendelson. NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice. 1 medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.05.21261642; this version posted August 7, 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Radar Detection of Artillery Rockets Page 1 (38) [email protected]
    Robert Humeur Radar detection of artillery rockets Page 1 (38) [email protected] Författare Förband Kurs Robert Humeur Luftvärnsregementet 1CP018 Handledare Övlt Michael Reberg, övlt Mattias Elfström Radarupptäckt av artilleriraketer Sammanfattning: Denna rapport behandlar en radarsensors förmåga att upptäcka 107 mm raketer beroende på hur sensorn positioneras i förhållande till skyddsobjektet. Fältförsök, underrättelser och stridserfarenheter har visat att dessa raketer är vanligt förekommande samt svåra att detektera med radarsensorer. En modell för hur räckviddsökning beror på olika sensorpositioner har skapats genom att använda dokument från USA och forna Sovjetunionen beskrivande ballistik tillsammans med teorier för hur räckvidd påverkas av radarmålarea (RCS) samt en beskrivning av RCS tillhandahållen av FOI. Resultat från körningar i MATLAB visar att sensorpositioner inom 300 meter från skyddsobjektet är fördelaktiga vid en skottvidd av 3000 meter. Som tumregel för att uppnå maximal sensorprestanda bör strävan vara att placera sensorn på ett avstånd från skyddsobjektet understigande 10% av förväntad skottvidd. Nyckelord: C-RAM, raket, artilleri, radar, radarmålarea, upptäckt. Robert Humeur Radar detection of artillery rockets Page 2 (38) [email protected] Author Unit Course Robert Humeur The Swedish GBAD 1CP018 Regiment Supervisor LtCol Michael Reberg, LtCol Mattias Elfström Radar detection of artillery rockets Abstract: This report examines how a radar sensor’s ability to detect 107 mm rockets depends on sensor positioning in relation to the protected asset. Field trials, intelligence and combat experience have shown that these rockets are commonly used and among the most difficult to detect with radar sensors. By using U.S. and U.S.S.R. documentation on rocket ballistics together with existing theories of detection range dependence on radar cross section (RCS) and a RCS description provided by FOI, a model for range gain for various sensor positions is constructed.
    [Show full text]
  • KV-IV in Bolt Action
    KV-IV in Bolt action Points: Inexperienced (650 points) includes 15 crewmen and 1 commissar Damage Value: 10+ (Heavy Tank) Options • Spotter +10 points • Four man rocket reload crew + 28 points Weapons Hard point Weapons Range Shots Pen Special Rules Bow Bow MMG 36” 5 - Team, Fixed, forward arc Forward turret Medium Anti Tank Gun 60” 1 +5 Team, Fixed, forward, right, left arcs, HE(1”) coax MMG 36” 5 - Team, Fixed, forward, right, left arcs rear MMG 36” 5 - Team, Fixed, right, left arcs Forward sub turret Vehicle flame throwers 12” D6+1 +3 Team, Fixed, Forward, right, left arcs, Flamethrower Pintel HMG 36” 3 1 Team, Fixed, Flak Deck MG turret Twin MMG 36” 10 - Team, Fixed, Right arc Deck MG turret Twin MMG 36” 10 - Team, Fixed, Left arc Midships turret Twin heavy Howitzer (36”-84”) 2 HE Team, Fixed, forward, Left, right arcs, 72” Howitzer HE(4”) Rear MMG 36” 5 - Team, Fixed, Left Right arcs Pintel HMG 36” 3 1 Team, Fixed, Flak Midships sub Light Anti Tank gun 48” 1 +4 Team, Fixed, forward, right, left arcs, turret: HE(1”) Coax MMG 36” 5 - Team, Fixed, Left Right arcs Rear MMG 36” 5 - Team, Fixed, Left Right arcs Deck MG turret Twin MMG 36” 10 - Team, Fixed, Right arc Deck MG turret Twin MMG 36” 10 - Team, Fixed, Left arc Rear turret Medium Anti Tank Gun 60” 1 +5 Team, Fixed, rear, right, left arcs, HE(1”) coax MMG 36” 5 - Team, Fixed, rear, right, left arcs rear MMG 36” 5 - Team, Fixed, left, right arcs Katyusha Multiple launcher (12”-72”) 1 HE Team, Fixed, rear, right, left arcs, HE(3”) Special Rules Slow: maximum move of 6 inches Poor turning circle: instead of pivoting 90 degrees the front of the tank can be moved up to 3 inches to the left or right when the tank pivots.
    [Show full text]