DOCSLIB.ORG

KV-IV in Bolt Action

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
KV-IV in Bolt Action KV-IV in Bolt action Points: Inexperienced (650 points) includes 15 crewmen and 1 commissar Damage Value: 10+ (Heavy Tank) Options • Spotter +10 points • Four man rocket reload crew + 28 points Weapons Hard point Weapons Range Shots Pen Special Rules Bow Bow MMG 36” 5 - Team, Fixed, forward arc Forward turret Medium Anti Tank Gun 60” 1 +5 Team, Fixed, forward, right, left arcs, HE(1”) coax MMG 36” 5 - Team, Fixed, forward, right, left arcs rear MMG 36” 5 - Team, Fixed, right, left arcs Forward sub turret Vehicle flame throwers 12” D6+1 +3 Team, Fixed, Forward, right, left arcs, Flamethrower Pintel HMG 36” 3 1 Team, Fixed, Flak Deck MG turret Twin MMG 36” 10 - Team, Fixed, Right arc Deck MG turret Twin MMG 36” 10 - Team, Fixed, Left arc Midships turret Twin heavy Howitzer (36”-84”) 2 HE Team, Fixed, forward, Left, right arcs, 72” Howitzer HE(4”) Rear MMG 36” 5 - Team, Fixed, Left Right arcs Pintel HMG 36” 3 1 Team, Fixed, Flak Midships sub Light Anti Tank gun 48” 1 +4 Team, Fixed, forward, right, left arcs, turret: HE(1”) Coax MMG 36” 5 - Team, Fixed, Left Right arcs Rear MMG 36” 5 - Team, Fixed, Left Right arcs Deck MG turret Twin MMG 36” 10 - Team, Fixed, Right arc Deck MG turret Twin MMG 36” 10 - Team, Fixed, Left arc Rear turret Medium Anti Tank Gun 60” 1 +5 Team, Fixed, rear, right, left arcs, HE(1”) coax MMG 36” 5 - Team, Fixed, rear, right, left arcs rear MMG 36” 5 - Team, Fixed, left, right arcs Katyusha Multiple launcher (12”-72”) 1 HE Team, Fixed, rear, right, left arcs, HE(3”) Special Rules Slow: maximum move of 6 inches Poor turning circle: instead of pivoting 90 degrees the front of the tank can be moved up to 3 inches to the left or right when the tank pivots. Commissar: has his own order dice and can only affect the tank crew and cannot operate any of the tanks weapons. Every time a crewman is shot “to encourage the others” one weapon becomes inoperable. Don’t worry there are more weapons than crewmen. There are 15 crewmen on board. The last crewman can be shot as an enemy of the state in a fit of zealotry by the commissar, at which point the tank is destroyed and the commissar has to walk home. Should the commissar decide to abandon the tank while the crew are still alive they will shoot him with their small arms, roll to save as normal. If the commissar survives he c.an act as a normal commissar. Twin heavy Howitzer: Both barrels fire at the same target. If both barrels hit the target, please two templates over the target and calculate the effect of each hit separately to determine the total number of hits and pin markers the target receives. Katyusha Rocket Launcher: This devastating weapon system can only be fired indirectly and can only be reloaded from outside of the tank, if the tank is taking a rally action. Rocket reload crew: Very silly option of taking a tank riding reload crew, equipped with ladders who can reload the rocket launcher when the tank spends a turn stationary and not down. They may be targeted separately from the tank but do not suffer pin markers, they will be affected by the pin markers accumulated by the tank. If they are all killed then the tank can only reload the rocket launcher by using a rally action. Observation tower: if deployed an artillery spotter can occupy the “crows nest” and observe for indirect fire from the tank – or if he is a forward observer for an artillery barrage. Like all observers he will count as “down” if targeted despite being “up”. If the tower is deployed the Midships sub turret can only fire in the same arc as the midships turret. The tank cannot take a “run” action whilst the tower is deployed – alright it can but the tower will collapse and the spotter or observer will be lost “overboard!”. Silly: this goes without saying. Due to the experimental nature of the vehicle it will not survive the battle. If it is not destroyed by enemy action or the commissar’s zealotry it will be destroyed at the end of the last turn in some sort of freak accident. If the commissar is on board at the time of this “accident”, he, too, is dead. So yes, despite spending a vast amount of resources on this fine vehicle you will lose it eventually. Unbalanced: Should all the main guns, medium or heavier, fire at a target or targets in the same arc, left or right, roll a D6 on the score of a 6 the tank will tip over on to its side and is destroyed. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • COMBAT DAMAGE ASSESSMENT TEAM A-10/GAU-8 LOW ANGLE FIRINGS VERSUS INDIVIDUAL SOVIET TANKS (February - March 1978)
    NPS56-79-005 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California COMBAT DAMAGE ASSESSMENT TEAM A-10/GAU-8 LOW ANGLE FIRINGS VERSUS INDIVIDUAL SOVIET TANKS (February - March 1978) R.H.S. Stolfi J.E. Clemens R.R. McEachir August 1979 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited •7 Prepared for: A-10 System Program Office Wright Patterson Air Force Base Ohio 45433 FEDDOCS D 208.1 4/2:NPS-56-79-005 r NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California Rear Admiral Tyler F. - Dedman Jark R Rnrct1 nn Superintendent Borsting jjj^J' he r ed he rein P was supported by the A-10 System Program OfficI Wr?nht p fl r 9 ,T r F° r " BaSe Ohio ' The " ' reproduction of allai\ oror'oarpart of thisf"reportt' is authorized. UNCLASSIFIED SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (Whan Dili Bnlarad) READ INSTRUCTIONS REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE BEFORE COMPLETING FORM NO 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER t. REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVT ACCESSION NPS56-79-005 S. TYPE OF REPORT ft PERIOD COVERED 4. TITLE (and Subtltlt) Special Report for Period Combat Damage Assessment Team A-10/GAU-8 February - March 1978 Low Angle Firings Versus Individual Soviet 6. PERFORMING ORG. REPORT NUMBER Tanks (February - March 1978) B. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBERf*.) 7. AUTHOR^; R.H.S. Stolfi None J.E. Clemens R.R. McEachin 10. PROGRAM ELEMENT, PROJECT, TASK 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS AREA ft WORK UNIT NUMBERS Naval Postgraduate School F 47615-78-5209 and Monterey, California 93940 FY 7621-78-90220 12. REPORT DATE II. CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS A-10 System Program Office January 1979 Wright Patterson Air Force Base 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran, Terrorism, and Weapons of Mass Destruction
    Iran, Terrorism, and Weapons of Mass Destruction Prepared Remarks for the hearing entitled “WMD Terrorism and Proliferant States” before the Subcommittee on the Prevention of Nuclear and Biological Attacks of the Homeland Security Committee September 8, 2005 Dr. Daniel Byman Director, Center for Peace and Security Studies, Georgetown University Senior Fellow, Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution E-mail: [email protected] Iran, Terrorism, and Weapons of Mass Destruction Chairman Linder, Members of the Committee, and Committee staff, I am grateful for this opportunity to speak before you today. I am speaking today as a Professor in the Georgetown University Security Studies Program and as a non-resident Senior Fellow at the Brookings’ Saban Center for Middle East Policy. My remarks are solely my own opinion: they do not reflect my past work for the intelligence community, the 9/11 Commission, the U.S. Congress, or other branches of the U.S. government. Since the Islamic Revolution in 1979, Iran has been one of the world’s most active sponsors of terrorism. Tehran has armed, trained, financed, inspired, organized, and otherwise supported dozens of violent groups over the years. Iran has backed not only groups in its Persian Gulf neighborhood, but also terrorists and radicals in Lebanon, the Palestinian territories, Bosnia, the Philippines, and elsewhere.1 This support remains strong even today. It comes as no surprise then, twenty five years after the revolution, the U.S. State Department still considers Iran “the most active state sponsor of terrorism.”2 Yet despite Iran’s very real support for terrorism today, I contend that it is not likely to transfer chemical, biological, nuclear, or radiological weapons to terrorists for three major reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Tank Gunnery
    Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com MHI Copy 3 FM 17-12 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FIELD MANUAL TANK GUNNERY HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NOVEMBER 1964 Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com PREPARE TO FIRE Instructional Card (M41A3, M48, and M60 Tanks) TANK COMMANDER GUNNER DRIVER LOADER Commond: PREPARE TO Observe looder's actionr in Cleon periscopes, Check indicotor tape for FIRE. making check of replenisher in. lower seat, close proper amount of recoil oil Inspect coaxial machine- dicotor tope. Clean nd inspect hoatch, nd turn in replenilher. Check posi- gun ond telescope ports gunner s direct-fire sights. Check on master switch. tion of breechblock crank to ensure gun shield operaoion of sight covers if op. stop. Open breech (assisted cover is correctly posi- cable. Check instrument lights. by gunner); inspect cham- tioned ond clomps are Assist loader in opening breech. ber ond tube, and clote secure. Clean exterior breech. Check coxial lenses and vision devices. mochinegun and adjust and clean ond inspect head space if opplicble. commander's direct-fire Check coaxial machinegun sight(s). Inspect cupolao mount ond odjust solenoid. sowed ammunilion if Inspect turret-stowed am. applicable. munitlon. Command: CHECK FIR- Ploce main gun safety in FIRE Start auxiliary Place moin gun safety ING SWITCHES. position if located on right side engine (moin en- in FIREposition if loated If main gun has percus- of gun. Turn gun switch ON. gin. if tank has on left side of gun. If sion mechanism, cock gun Check firing triggers on power no auxiliary en- moin gun hoaspercussion for eoch firing check if control handle if applicable.
    [Show full text]
  • 115 Mm, 120 Mm & 125 Mm Tank Guns
    CHARACTERISATION OF EXPLOSIVE WEAPONS ANNEX D 115 MM, 120 MM & 125 MM TANK GUNS The Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD) is an expert organisation working to reduce the impact of mines, cluster munitions and other explosive hazards, in close partnership with states, the UN and other human security actors. Based at the Maison de la paix in Geneva, the GICHD employs around 55 staff from over 15 countries with unique expertise and knowledge. bhenkz2) Our work is made possible by core contributions, project funding and in-kind support from more than 20 governments and organisations. photobucket The research project was guided and advised by a group of 18 international experts dealing with credit: weapons-related research and practitioners who address the implications of explosive weapons in humanitarian, policy, advocacy and legal fields. This document contributes to the research of the (Photo characterisation of explosive weapons (CEW) project in 2015-2016. gun main its firing Characterisation of explosive weapons study, annex D – 115 m m, 120 mm & 125 mm tank guns GICHD, Geneva, February 2017 T-90MS-V ISBN: 978-2-940369-65-2 Tank Russian The content of this publication, its presentation and the designations employed do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD) regarding the legal status of image: any country, territory or armed group, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. All content remains the sole responsibility of the GICHD. Cover CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 TANK GUNS 6 High Explosive Tank Gun Ammunition 8 TANK GUN CASE STUDIES 11 Brief Descriptions 11 CASE STUDIES 13 Case Study 1 13 Case Study 2 17 Case Study 3 21 Case Study 4 24 Case Study 5 26 Annex D Contents 3 INTRODUCTION This study examines the characteristics, use and effects of tank guns and tank projectiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Erdogan Warns Syria to Back Off from Turkish Outposts
    Gulf / Middle East / Africa Thursday, February 6, 2020 07 Avalanches kill nearly 40 in eastern Turkey AFP overall toll to 38. Eight people be under the snow. Interior Minister Suley- Local media reported that ANKARA had been rescued alive from The rescuers had been man Soylu said rescuers had residents in nearby areas also the first avalanche. searching for two people from paused overnight and re- joined the rescue efforts in an AT least 33 people were killed Television images showed Tuesday’s incident, AFAD’s sumed their efforts Wednes- area difficult to reach in harsh in eastern Turkey on Wednes- dozens of people scrambling up Van province chairman Os- day morning to find the last winter conditions. day by a second avalanche the mountains, digging through man Ucar told reporters from two people. Television images showed which buried a team of rescu- snow in blizzards to find those his hospital bed. Authorities were alerted to dozens of people scrambling up ers searching for people hit by trapped under the snow. He was among those in- the first avalanche when snow- the mountains, digging through the first the day before. The number of those in- jured including former rul- clearing vehicle operator Ba- snow in blizzards to find those The bodies of 33 rescue jured was 53 in total after the ing party MP for Van, Gulsen hattin Karagulle escaped from caught under the snow. workers and civilians were second avalanche hit after Orhan, who now advises Presi- his snow-covered machine A special military plane discovered in Van province, 0900 GMT between Bahc- dent Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
    [Show full text]
  • Fighting Vehicle Technology
    Fighting Vehicle Technology 41496_DSTA 60-77#150Q.indd 1 5/6/10 12:44 AM ABSTRACT Armoured vehicle technology has evolved ever since the first tanks appeared in World War One. The traditional Armoured Fighting Vehicle (AFV) design focuses on lethality, survivability and mobility. However, with the growing reliance on communications and command (C2) systems, there is an increased need for the AFV design to be integrated with the vehicle electronics, or vetronics. Vetronics has become a key component of the AFV’s effectiveness on the battlefield. An overview of the technology advances in these areas will be explored. In addition, the impact on the human aspect as a result of these C2 considerations will be covered. Tan Chuan-Yean Mok Shao Hong Vince Yew 41496_DSTA 60-77#150Q.indd 2 5/6/10 12:44 AM Fighting Vehicle Technology 62 and more advanced sub-systems will raise the INTRODUCTION question of how the modern crew is able to process and use the information effectively. On the modern battlefield, armies are moving towards Network-Centric Warfare TECHNOLOGIES IN AN (NCW). Forces no longer fight as individual entities but as part of a larger system. Each AFV entity becomes a node in a network where information can be shared, and firepower can Firepower be called upon request. AFVs are usually equipped with weapon Key to this network fighting capability is the stations for self-protection and the communications and command (C2) system. engagement of targets. Depending on By enabling each force to be plugged into the threat, some are equipped with pintle the C2 system, information can be shared mount systems for light weapons (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Tankovy Batalon (Red Army) Tankovy 1500
    TANKOVY BATALON (RED ARMY) TANKOVY 1500 CONFIDENT CONSCRIPT TANK COMPANY POINTS 1500 PLATOON QTY UNIT POINTS HEADQUARTERS Tankovy Batalon HQ (Red Army) p.57 1 T-34 obr 1940 215 COMBAT COMPANIES Tankovy Company (Red Army) p.57 2 T-34 obr 1940 430 Tankovy Company (Red Army) p.57 2 T-34 obr 1940 430 DIVISIONAL SUPPORT COMPANIES Sapper Company (Red Army) p.76 1 Cmd Pioneer Komissar team 85 6 Pioneer Rifle team Guards Rocket Mortar Battalion p.82 1 Cmd Komissar team 85 FEARLESS TRAINED 1 Observer Rifle team 1 Truck 2 BM-13 Katyusha (5+ crew) KV Tankovy Company (Red Army) p.61 1 KV-2 255 Barbarossa ‑ Soviet Early‑War ARSENAL TANK TEAMS Name Mobility Front Side Top Equipment and Notes Weapon Range ROF Anti-tank Firepower MEDIUM TANKS T-34 obr 1940 Standard Tank 6 5 1 Co-ax MG, Hull MG, Fast tank, Limited vision, Unreliable, Wide-tracks. 76mm L-11 gun 24"/60cm 2 8 3+ HEAVY TANKS KV-2 Slow Tank 8 7 2 Hull MG, Turret-rear MG, Limited vision, Unreliable. 152mm obr 1938/40 howitzer 24"/60cm 1 10 1+ Bunker Buster. ROCKET LAUNCHERS BM-13 Katyusha (5+ crew) Wheeled - - - Mobile Rocket Launcher, Count as two weapons firing. BM-13-16 rocket launcher 64"/160cm - 2 4+ Concentrated fire, Rocket launcher. INFANTRY TEAMS Team Range ROF Anti-tank Firepower Notes Komissar team 4"/10cm 1 1 6+ Rifle team 16"/40cm 1 2 6+ ADDITIONAL TRAINING AND EQUIPMENT Pioneer teams are rated as Tank Assault 3. TRANSPORT TEAMS Equipment and Vehicle Mobility Front Side Top Notes TRUCKS ZIS-5 3-ton, ZIS-6 4-ton, Dodge 3/4-ton, or Wheeled - - - Studebaker 2 1/2-ton truck VEHICLE MACHINE‐GUNS Weapon Range ROF Anti-tank Firepower Vehicle MG 16"/40cm 3 2 6 ROF 1 if other weapons fire.
    [Show full text]
  • MS Owen-Smith. Armoured Fighting Vehicle Casualties
    J R Army Med Corps: first published as 10.1136/jramc-123-02-03 on 1 January 1977. Downloaded from J. roy. Army med. Cps. 1977. 123,65-76 ARMOURED FIGHTING VEHICLE CASUALTIES * Lieutenant-Colonel M. S. OWEN-SMITH, M.S., F.R.C.S. Professor of Surgery, Royal Army Medical College THE war between the Arabs and Israelis in October 1973 resulted in the most extensive tank battles since World War n. Indeed in one area involved they were claimed to be the most extensive in Military history, exceeding the 1600 tanks deployed at El Alamein. In.association with these battles some 830 Israeli tanks and about 1400 Arab tanks were destroyed. The Israelis have recorded data on the wounded from this war in a number of articles and presentations. The most striking figure is that just under 10 per cent of all injured suffered burns. Virtually all these burns occurred in Armoured Fighting Vehicle (A.F.V.) crews. The problems I want to discuss are: a. Does the total incidence of burns from major tank battles create a definite departure from previous experiences and must we, therefore, include this figure in pre- planning for conflict in N.W. Europe? . guest. Protected by copyright. b. Does the present range of anti-tank weapons pose a greater threat to tanks and, crew than those of 30 years ago? c. Is there such an entity as " The Anti-Tank Missile Burn Syndrome"? d. What medical lessons can we learn from this war that would benefit the treatment of war wounded in general, and A.F.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Military Modernization and Force Development Main Report
    + Center for Strategic and International Studies Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy 1800 K Street, N.W. • Suite 400 • Washington, DC 20006 Phone: 1 (202) 775 -3270 • Fax: 1 (202) 457 -8746 Web: http://www.csis.org/burke • Email: [email protected] Chinese Military Modernization and Force Development Main Report Anthony H. Cordesman Martin Klei ber Burke Chair in Strategy Burke Chair Researcher Working Draft, Revised: September 7, 2006 Copyright CSIS, all rights reserved. Cordesman and Kleiber: Chinese Military Modernization 9/7/06 Page ii Table of Contents I. ASSESSING CHINA’S ARMED FORCES ................................ ................................ ............................ 1 CAPABILITIES AS AN INDI CATOR OF INTENTIONS ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 1 II. UNDERLYING RESOU RCES FOR CHINA’S SEC URITY CAPABILITIES ................................ 3 ECONOMIC TRENDS ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 3 Figure 1: China’s annual GDP growth rates in % (1975 -2006) ................................ ................................ ........................ 4 Figure 2: GDP growth vs. national government revenue growth ................................ ................................ ...................... 5 DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS ................................ ................................ ................................ ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    CCrriittiiccaall TTeecchhnnooll ooggyy EEvveennttss iinn tthhee Development of the Abrams Tank Development of the Abrams Tank PPrroojjeecctt HHiinnddssiigghhtt RReevviissiitteedd Richard Chait, John Lyons, and Duncan Long Center for Technology and National Security Policy National Defense University December 2005 The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the National Defense University, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. All information and sources for this paper were drawn from unclassified materials. Richard Chait is a Distinguished Research Professor at the Center for Technology and National Security Policy (CTNSP), National Defense University. He was previously Chief Scientist, Army Material Command, and Director, Army Research and Laboratory Management. Dr. Chait received his Ph.D in Solid State Science from Syracuse University and a B.S. degree from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. John W. Lyons is a Distinguished Research Professor at CTNSP. He was previously director of the Army Research Laboratory and director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Dr. Lyons received his Ph.D from Washington University. He holds a B.A. from Harvard. Duncan Long is a Research Associate at CTNSP. He holds a Master of International Affairs degree from the School of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University, and a B.A. from Stanford University. Acknowledgments. A project of this magnitude and scope could not have been conducted without the involvement of many people. Their cooperation and willingness to recount events that happened many years ago made this paper possible. The Army Science and Technology (S&T) Executive, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Explosive Incidents Flash News ( 16 - 22 JAN 2020)
    iMMAP - Humanitarian Access Response Weekly Explosive Incidents Flash News ( 16 - 22 JAN 2020) 91 20 80 12 0 INCIDENTS PEOPLE KILLED PEOPLE INJURED EXPLOSIONS AIRSTRIKES NINEWA GOVERNORATE Popular Mobilization Forces 22/JAN/2020 Popular Mobilization Forces 17/JAN/2020 killed three ISIS members and arrested seven others in Tarmiyah district. repelled an attack from ISIS in Al-Hader district southwest of Ninewa. An Armed Group 18/JAN/2020 DIYALA GOVERNORATE killed a civilian with light weapons in Munira village, in Al-Qayyara subdistrict, south of ISIS 16/JAN/2020 Mosul. Attacked Albu-Herosh village with mortar shells aiming to displace its residents. The village is located between Salah Al-Din and Diyala governorates. An Armed Group 20/JAN/2020 Two civilians injured by an IED explosion in Badush area northwest of Mosul. An Armed Group 16/JAN/2020 Detonated an IED near the house of Deputy Governor of Diyala, located in the Khalis An Armed Group 20/JAN/2020 district north of Baqubah. Kidnapped a father and his four sons inside their house. The sons were released after hours, but their father killed and his body left dumped on road in Al-Barit village which Security Forces 17/JAN/2020 located 15 km south of Hader district. Arrested one of the most dangerous militants linked to ISIS after a field monitoring and follow-up in the Al-Nada region. The arrestee is the cell official and is specialized in ISIS 21/JAN/2020 installing IEDs. Attacked a house in the south of Al-Hader district, killing the owner and stealing his car and his livestock.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper 2 China North Industries Corporation
    Working paper 2 China North Industries Corporation International Peace Information Service vzw & Omega Research Foundation © 2016 1 Editorial December 2016, Antwerp Working paper 2 on China North Industries Group Corporation Authors: International Peace Information Service (IPIS) & Omega Research Foundation Layout: Sakado Front Cover Image: CS/VA1 Light Strike Vehicle - © Robin Ballantyne / Omega Research Foundation - photographed at IDEX 2013 International Peace Information Service (IPIS) is an independent research institute, providing governmental and non-governmental actors with information and analysis to build sustainable peace and development in Sub-Saharan Africa. The research is centred around four programmes: Natural Resources, Business & Human Rights, Arms Trade & Security, and Conflict Mapping. ww.ipisresearch.be The Omega Research Foundation (Omega) is an independent UK-based research organisation. We are dedicated to providing rigorous, objective, evidence-based research on the manufacture, trade in, and use of, military, security and police (MSP) technologies. www.omegaresearchfoundation.org This report was established with the support of the Belgian Development Cooperation (DGD) 2 Table of contents Editiorial ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 4 China North Industries
    [Show full text]