SPATIAL PLAN of KOSOVA Prishtina June, 2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SPATIAL PLAN of KOSOVA Prishtina June, 2010 SPATIAL PLAN OF KOSOVA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND SPATIAL PLANNING PLANNING AND SPATIAL ENVIRONMENT OF MINISTRY Prishtina 1 Institute forJune, Spatial Planning2010 SPATIAL PLAN OF KOSOVA MINISTRY FOF ENVIRONMENT AND SPATIAL PLANNING AND SPATIAL ENVIRONMENT FOF MINISTRY Institute for Spatal Planning 2 SPATIAL PLAN OF KOSOVA Kosova Our home Spatial Plan of Kosova 2010 – 2020+ MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND SPATIAL PLANNING PLANNING AND SPATIAL ENVIRONMENT OF MINISTRY 3 Institute for Spatial Planning SPATIAL PLAN OF KOSOVA Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning The document is prepared from The Institute of Spatial Planning in collaboration with other sectors in Government of Kosova. PLANNING AND SPATIAL ENVIRONMENT FOF MINISTRY Prishtina, June 2010. Atention! Competent version of the dokument is the albanian version language. Institute for Spatal Planning 4 SPATIAL PLAN OF KOSOVA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND SPATIAL PLANNING PLANNING AND SPATIAL ENVIRONMENT OF MINISTRY 5 Institute for Spatial Planning SPATIAL PLAN OF KOSOVA Content Prologue ………………….………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 9 The role and validity of spatial plan............................................ ........ ……. 9 The process of drafting the Kosovo Spatial Plan .......................................... 10 Public Participation ................................................ ............................. 11 Public Consultation ................................................ .............................. 11 Index terminology ............................................... ................................ 13 I. Profile development and spatial analysis of the situation…………………………….…….. 19 Spatial development profile ......................................... ........................ 19 Kosovo - The basic data .................................... .................................. 19 Demographics and social development .............................................. ....... 20 Housing, locations deployement ..................................................... ...... 30 Environment and land use ............................................. ................ …….. 35 Water ................................................. ........................................... 37 Land ................................................. ............................................. 41 Forests ................................................. .......................................... 48 Groundwater assets ................................................ ........................... 49 Cultural and Natural Heritage .............................................. ........... ……… 51 Flooding ................................................. ......................................... 52 Erosion ................................................. .......................................... 54 Seismicity ................................................. ...................................... 56 Economic Development ................................................ ....................... 58 Agriculture ................................................. ..................................... 59 Industry ................................................. ........................................ 61 Trade ................................................. .......................................... 63 Handicraft.............................................. ......................................... 66 Tourism ................................................. ......................................... 66 Energy ................................................. ..................................... …… 67 Unequally economic development .............................................. ............ 71 Technical infrastructure ................................................ ...................... 72 Transport and its infrastructure ............................................. .............. 72 Automotive transportation ................................................ ................... 73 Rail Transportion ................................................ .............................. 74 Air Transportation ................................................ ............................. 75 Telecommunications ................................................. ......................... 75 Energy infrastructure ............................................... .................. ……… 78 Water Infrastructure ................................................ .......................... 80 Water Use ............................................... ................................. ……… 80 Regulation of water regime ............................................. ..................... 80 Protecting water from pollution ............................................. ............... 81 Waste landfills ............................................... .................................. 82 Potential for development of technical infrastructure ................................... 83 Trend scenario ............................................... .................................. 83 Context in the region and Europe ............................................. .............. 85 PLANNING AND SPATIAL ENVIRONMENT FOF MINISTRY Kosovo and its neighbors ............................................... ...................... 85 Initiatives in Southeast Europe .............................................. .............. 85 Strategies sectors of the Government of Kosovo ......................................... 85 Assessing the situation in Kosovo ............................................. .............. 89 SWOT Analysis ................................................ .................................. 89 Assessment of capacity investment .............................................. ........... 92 Projections sector investment and resources ....................................... ……… 93 Public investment (government) ............................................. ............... 94 Projections of investment sources ............................................. ....... …… 95 The challenges of spatial development ......................................... ........... 97 Institute for Spatal Planning 6 SPATIAL PLAN OF KOSOVA Economy and Employment ............................................... ..................... 97 Heritage and sustainable development ............................................. ...... 100 Unrational space use.............................................. ............................ 102 Unquallity living environment............................................... ................. 104 Low level of health and education ........................................... ........ …….. 107 High poverty ............................................. ........................ ………………… 111 Standards, norms and principles ............................................. ............... 115 II. Vision, principles and goals ......................................... ...................... 117 Statement of vision for the future of Kosovo ....................................... ...... 117 General principles for development / protection ......................................... 117 Long-term development targets ............................................... .............. 118 Strategic Priorities ................................................ .......................... 119 III. Spatial Development Framework .............................................. ........... 121 The main concepts of spatial development ............................................... 121 Spatial structure and organization of future development ......................... …… 122 Socio-economic development .............................................. .................. 122 Distribution and development of settlements ............................................. 123 Network structure settlements ............................................. ..........…….. 125 Major Centers ............................................... ................................. 126 Small Centers ............................................... .................................. 127 New municipalities……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 127 Villages ................................................. ......................................... 127 Preservation and environmental protection ............................................. .. 128 Areas of particular interest for Kosovo …………………………………………………………………….. 130 Special Protective Zones …………………………………………………………………………………………… 130 Development and integration of infrastructure and communication .................. 131 Conflicts and potential sinergies ........................................... ............. 132 Spatial structure in Kosovo .............................................. ..................... 133 Treasury of Kosovo (green area) .......................................... ................... 133 Port of Kosovo (blue space) .......................................... .................. ….. 136 Bridges of Kosovo (yellow space) .......................................... ................. 141 Gardens of Kosovo (orange space) .......................................... ...... ………… 145 Bridges of Kosovo (yellow space) .......................................... ................. 149 Gardens of Kosovo (orange space) .......................................... ...... ……….. 153 IV. Strategy and implementation actions ......................................
Recommended publications
  • The Effects of Nationalism on Territorial Integrity Among Armenians and Serbs Nina Patelic
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2008 The Effects of Nationalism on Territorial Integrity Among Armenians and Serbs Nina Patelic Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES THE EFFECTS OF NATIONALISM ON TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY AMONG ARMENIANS AND SERBS By Nina Patelic A Thesis submitted to the Department of International Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2008 The members of the Committee approve the thesis of Nina Pantelic, defended on September 28th, 2007. ------------------------------- Jonathan Grant Professor Directing Thesis ------------------------------- Peter Garretson Committee Member ------------------------------- Mark Souva Committee Member The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii ACKOWLEDGEMENTS This paper could not have been written without the academic insight of my thesis committee members, as well as Dr. Kotchikian. I would also like to thank my parents Dr. Svetlana Adamovic and Dr. Predrag Pantelic, my grandfather Dr. Ljubisa Adamovic, my sister Ana Pantelic, and my best friend, Jason Wiggins, who have all supported me over the years. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………..v INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………….1 1. NATIONALISM, AND HOW IT DEVELOPED IN SERBIA AND ARMENIA...6 2. THE CONFLICT OVER KOSOVO AND METOHIJA…………………………...27 3. THE CONFLICT OVER NAGORNO KARABAKH……………………………..56 CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………...……….89 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………………………………93 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH………………………………………………………….101 iv ABSTRACT Nationalism has been a driving force in both nation building and in spurring high levels of violence. As nations have become the norm in modern day society, nationalism has become detrimental to international law, which protects the powers of sovereignty.
    [Show full text]
  • 59-012 Vanka-Heijman.Indd
    The Kosovar wine cluster: A booster for regional development? Gajo M. VANKA1, Wim J.M. HEIJMAN2 1Department of Social Sciences, Economics of Consumers and Households Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands 2Department of Social Sciences, Agricultural Economics and Rural Policy Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands Abstract: Kosovo is an economy in transition with a high unemployment, a young population and structural problems. Clusters could be considered as an appropriate approach to develop the region. Th is paper deals with the economic pro- spects of the Kosovar wine cluster, its current opportunities and the introduction of new approaches. Th e analysis was based on the Porter’s innovation theory and the diamond model. Th e Kosovar wine sector could be a promising example for the future cluster development. Wine has a long history in Kosovo although wine consumption is not widespread. Th is paper presents the main problems and opportunities within this sector, describing its structural changes and current developments. Th e study aims to introduce its readers to the potential that the cluster development can off er as well as to understand the local circumstances. Its main focus is therefore to introduce the advantages and opportunities that clusters could bring to this sector, considering the three pillars of sustainable development, namely economic growth, environmen- tal and social development, and achieving competitiveness. Key words: agribusiness sector, business clusters, competitiveness, diamond model, Kosovo, Porter’s innovation theory, Serbia, sustainable development, wine. This research examines sustainable development winemaking all makes this sector attractive to foreign in Kosovo by focusing on the interaction between agencies and investors.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Development Plan Dragash
    United Nations Development Programme Conservation of Biodiversity and Sustainable Land Use Management in Dragash/Dragaš Municipal Development Plan for the Municipality of Dragash/Dragaš 2013 - 2023 1 Dragash / Dragaš, Kosovo August 2013 Contents Contents ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................................................ 3 List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Project Background ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Purpose of the MDP ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Public Consultation ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Illegal Logging in Kosovo (Under UNSCR 1244/1999): Diagnostic Audit
    Illegal Logging in SEE and EE (Governance, Implementation and Enforcement) Illegal logging activities in Kosovo (under UNSCR 1244/1999) B. DIAGNOSTIC AUDIT Prishtina June 2010 KOSOVO UNDER UNSCR 1244 2 KOSOVO UNDER UNSCR 1244 Table of content Table of content .............................................................................................................3 List of abbreviations ......................................................................................................4 1. GOVERNANCE....................................................................................................5 1.1 Policy Framework......................................................................................5 1.1.1 Overall Forest Policy .............................................................................5 1.1.2 Overview of the country’s forests..........................................................5 1.1.3 Forest structure.......................................................................................6 1.1.4 Wood Industry .......................................................................................6 1.1.5 Volume of Illegal Logging.....................................................................7 1.1.6 Export and imports of Illegal Timber ....................................................7 1.2. Government Strategy for Illegal Logging Reduction .....................................7 1.3. Targeting of Government Response ...............................................................9 1.4. Internal cooperation/
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Development Atlas Volume I
    United Nations Development Programme Conservation of Biodiversity and Sustainable Land Use Management in Dragash/Dragaš Sustainable Development Atlas Framework for a comprehensive and balanced rural development for the Municipality of Dragash / Dragaš Kosovo1 Volume I: Introduction and Methodology Peter Bank Florian Bemmerlein-Lux Ismail Gagica Ergin Hajredini With contributions from Prof. Dr. Behxhet Mustafa – Ecologist, Prof. Fadil Millaku - Biologist, Dr. Halil Ibrahimi - Ecologist; Dr. Achim Milbradt – Biologist, Michael Voit - Rural Development Planner, Prof. Xhevdet Elezi - Soil scientist – agronomist, Arneni - National forest consultancy company, NGO Finches – Ornithologists, Todd Wassel – Tourism Specialist, Kaltrina Salihu – Community Officer, Bashkim Susuri – Journalist and Project Associate, Bardh Xerxa – Ecologist, Ajhan Hadzija – Tourism Coordinator, the Municipal Working Group of Dragash/Dragaš Municipality and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Rural Economic Development Programme. Project Manager Maria Elena Zuniga Barrientos Dragash / Dragaš, Kosovo December 2012 1 Programme of Cooperation between the institutions of Kosovo[1] and the United Nations Development Programme - Kosovo Programme Action Plan 2011 – 2015 ([1] Kosovo under United Nations Security Council resolution 1244 (1999)) 1 United Nations Development Programme Sustainable Development Atlas for Dragash / Dragaš – Kosovo Table of content volume I: “Introduction and Methodology” Acronyms ...............................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Allocation of Public Expenditures in the Post-War Kosovo: a Critical Analysis
    Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Theses 7-2020 Allocation of Public Expenditures in the post-war Kosovo: A critical analysis Leonita Krasniqi [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses Recommended Citation Krasniqi, Leonita, "Allocation of Public Expenditures in the post-war Kosovo: A critical analysis" (2020). Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology. Accessed from This Senior Project is brought to you for free and open access by RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Allocation of Public Expenditures in the post-war Kosovo: A critical analysis An Honors Society Project Leonita Krasniqi Advisor: Venera Demukaj, PhD Second reader: Besnik Bislimi, PhD July 2020 ALLOCATION OF PUBLIC EXPENDITURES IN KOSOVO Abstract How public expenditures are allocated can have profound effects on the macro-fiscal environment of a country. This research project analyzes how the Government of Kosovo allocates its public expenditures. Two particular strategic documents are examined—the Economic Vision 2011-2014 and the National Development Strategy 2016-2021. It does so by analyzing whether or not the priorities set in these strategies are translated in Medium-Term Expenditure Frameworks and the Budget Laws. Finally, this research project examines how the allocated public expenditures are realized. The research concludes that despite the well- established written strategies, a wide gap exists between the priorities set and their actual execution. 1 ALLOCATION OF PUBLIC EXPENDITURES IN KOSOVO Acknowledgments To the professors who have encouraged me to follow the path of economics.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation Transport in Kosovo
    NATIONALNATIONAL BACKGROUNDBACKGROUND REPORTREPORT ONON TRANSPORTTRANSPORT FORFOR KOSOVOKOSOVO* Shaban Buza, PhD, Professor Ramadan Duraku, MSc, Lecturer Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Consultation Session on Transport May 19 and 20, 2009 in Sarajevo/Bosnia-Herzegovina NATIONAL BACKGROUND REPORT ON TRANSPORT FOR KOSOVO KEY NOTES ¾ Introduction ¾ The Transport S&T system ¾ Overview of Transport research activities ¾ Key drivers of Transport research ¾ Integration of country in the European Research Area in field of Transport ¾ SWOT analysis of the Transport research capacity ¾ Transport research priorities for Kosovo Consultation Session on Transport Shaban Buza, PhD, Professor & Ramadan Duraku, MSc, Lecturer May 19 and 20, 2009 in Sarajevo/Bosnia-Herzegovina Faculty of Mechanical Engineering NATIONAL BACKGROUND REPORT ON TRANSPORT FOR KOSOVO INTRODUCTION Transport Sector is composed of three sub-sectors: 9Roads, with a network of 8,522 km classified as public roads, mainly single lane in poor condition, 9Railways, a system of 333 km situated in the North-South and East-West of Prishtina, and 9Air Transports with two airports, Prishtina International Airport (PIA) and Gjakova Airport for military purposes. Transport Infrastructure in Kosovo is in poor condition with insufficient road maintenance, rehabilitation and development, where 9Road transport covers over 95% of transport 9Railway infrastructure, movement, market and general services are of low quality. In the field of Trans-European Transport Network, Kosovo reached some progress
    [Show full text]
  • [ 2007 ] Part 1 Chapter 5 Europe and the Mediterranean
    Chapter V Europe and the Mediterranean The restoration of peace and stability in the post- (Moscow Agreement), and Georgia demanded the conflict countries in the European and Mediter- withdrawal of Russian peacekeeping forces from the ranean region advanced in 2007, as efforts to re- conflict zone. Compliance with the Moscow Agree- establish their institutions and social and economic ment and with Security Council resolutions 858(1993) infrastructure continued. However, a number of and 937(1994) was monitored by the United Nations issues remained unresolved. Observer Mission in Georgia (unomig) and by a col- Led by the European Union (eu), the international lective peacekeeping force of the Commonwealth of community continued to assist Bosnia and Herze- Independent States. govina to move towards full integration into Europe No progress was made towards settling the conflict through the eu Stabilization and Association Process. between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the occupied Bosnia and Herzegovina signed a security agreement Nagorno-Karabakh region in Azerbaijan. In July, with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (nato), Nagorno-Karabakh held presidential elections, the but the country was not successful in securing a Sta- results of which were rejected by Azerbaijan, several bilization and Association Agreement with the eu. neighbouring States, the eu, the Organization of the In Kosovo (Serbia), the United Nations Interim Islamic Conference and the Organization for Security Administration Mission in Kosovo (unmik) contin- and Cooperation in Europe, and its status remained ued to assist in the building of a modern, multi- uncertain at year’s end. ethnic society. In March, the Secretary-General’s Special Envoy for the future status of Kosovo pre- Similarly, no progress was made towards settling sented the Secretary-General with his proposal on the conflict with regard to the Transnistrian region Kosovo’s future status.
    [Show full text]
  • Kosovo Economy & Society After 1945
    Conflict Studies Research Centre G103 Kosovo Economy & Society After 1945 Some Observations James Pettifer This paper argues that many of the dilemmas the international community is facing in Kosovo have their origins in the immediate post-1945 period, and that lack of understanding of the nature of Kosovo society under communism and the Kosovo economy under Titoism is hampering the international community in governing Kosovo today. In the current major political and military conflict in Kosovo which culminated in the NATO bombing campaign, refugee exodus and subsequent withdrawal of Yugoslav troops and police from Kosovo in June 1999, the recent history of Kosovo has tended to be discussed from the period of the accession to power of Slobodan Milosevic in the late 1980s, and in more or less exclusively political terms. The 1974 Constitution, with its democratisation proposals, is usually about the limit of most non-Kosovars’ historical perspective. Yet in a recent British television interview the US Balkan negotiator Richard Holbrooke made the interesting revelation that in the latter stages of the Febuary 1999 negotiations before the NATO campaign began, it was events in Kosovo in 1946 that were at the forefront of Slobodan Milosevic’s mind.1 The violence that Milosevic was recalling was part of a much wider and deeper political crisis that occurred in Kosovo after World War II that has been little understood in the West. It is nevertheless still of seminal importance is assessing options for the future of Kosovo. Thousands of ethnic Albanians rose in revolt against the Tito government and disturbances continued in Kosovo for the next few years.
    [Show full text]
  • Kosovo's Agency for Environment Protection
    Kosovo’s Agency for Environment Protection A REPORT OF ENVIRONMENT SITUATION 2006-2007 Pristine 2008 Content CONTENT Content ………………….. Introduction Report compilers and Partners Abbrevations’ Index Table List Illustrations list Map list Summary I. PRESSIONS ACOORDING TO SECTORS 1. Socio-economic aspects Migration of total number of population and prognosis Natality of population Urbanization Density of population The population structure according to the age Economic development Rural population Habitations Destination of the land utilization 2. Energy Assessment of the situation Overall consumption of energy Energy intensity Production of primary energy Production of electricity Alternative sources of energy 3. Industry Assessment of situation Industrial production Industrial accidents Mine and minerals 4. Agriculture Assessment of situation Agricultural areas Utilization of pesticides and fertilizers Animal fond Farms Fishery and aquaculture 5. Forestry Assessment of situation Sustainable utilization of the forestry resources Forests according to the form of utilization Forestry production Forest impairment Content 6. Transport Assessment of situation Road infrastructure Air transport Public transport of passengers Transport of goods 7. Tourism Assessment of situation The register of tourists The capacity of emplacement Visits in the protected areas 8. Chemicals Assessment of situation II. SITUATION 1. Air Assessment of situation Broadcastings Quality Monitoring of air quality Monitoring of air quality in Pristine Monitoring of air quality in Mitrovica Monitoring of air quality in KEK- OBILIQ Climate changes UNDP Report Sources of the acidic compositions in air Acidulation 2. Waters Assessment of situation Superficial waters Rivers and water basins Lakes Underground waters Water management Water utilization in economy Water pollution 3. Soil Assesment of situation Pollution with heavy metals 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    EASTeWEST MANAGEMENT FROM -THE AMERiCAN PEOPLE INSTITUTE FINAL REPORT KOSOVO NGO ADVOCACY PROJECT Cooperative Agreement No. 167-A-00-01-00108-00 September 2001 through May 2005 Submitted to: U. S. Agency for International Development Submitted by: East -West Management Institute, Inc. August 2005 .LWARC Albanian National Training, Technical Assistance and Resourn Center .L\fPPKO Association of hlik Producers and Proeffsors of Korovo ATRC Advocacy Training and Resource Center AVOKO Iiosovo Adroeaey NGOs Setwork BCIF Balkan Community Initiative Fund BTD Balkan Trust for Democracy CEE Central and Eastern Europe CFA Call for Applications CIDh Canadian International Development Agency E\nn East-Wesl hlanagement Institute. Inc. EFC European Foundation Center EU European Union FDI Foundation for Democratic Initiatives FOIL Freedom of Information Law GMP Generally Accepted Acmunting Principles GTZ German Agency for Technical Cooperation IAS International Accounting Standards ICNL International Center for Not-for-profit Law Irn International Criminal Tribunal for ex-Yugoslavia IDEA International Institute for Democracy and Electoral .\ssistaoce IKDO Kosovar Institute for SGO Law IRC International Rescue Committee KFOS Kosovo Foundation for an Open Society KNAP Kwovo NGO Advocacy Project KTA Kosovo Transition Authority KOhT Kacovo Organization for Sew Initiatives KT1 Kosovo Transition Initiatives n\-I Kosovo \Yomen's Initiative sms htillenium Development Goals NAAC National Albanian .%merican Council NGO Non-governmental organization OCG Office
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Chapter
    chapter one Introduction n march 24, 1999, NATO went to war for the first time Oin its fifty-year history. Its target was not a country, but a man. As the Serb leader of Yugoslavia, Slobodan Milosevic had been most responsible for a decade of violence that accompanied the breakup of Yugo- slavia. Well over a hundred thousand people had been killed and millions displaced in Croatian and Bosnian wars during the first part of the 1990s. Now a similar humanitarian catastrophe threatened in Kosovo, part of Serbia, the heart of the former Yugoslavia. Milosevic’s security forces were arrayed against the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), a small insurgent force, and the ethnic Albanians who dominated the area’s population. In the previous year of fighting, nearly two thousand people had been killed and many hundreds of thousands were driven from their homes. A full-scale war in Kosovo be- tween Serbs and Albanians would likely have been particularly brutal, leav- ing untold death and destruction in its wake. Compounding the likely humanitarian disaster was the potential for large numbers of refugees en- gulfing the fragile border countries of Macedonia and Albania, with conse- quences for stability and security across the entire region. So NATO went to war. For a decade, the alliance had wavered in its re- solve to confront Milosevic. At times, the Serb leader had proven a willing partner in negotiating a halt to the region’s violence. More often, he had been the source of that violence. For more than a year, the United States and its principal European allies had tried to head off a military confrontation by seeking to engage the man most responsible for the carnage that had befallen Kosovo, an approach similar to that followed in Croatia and Bosnia earlier in the decade.
    [Show full text]