DOCSLIB.ORG

Port Lands Flood Protection and Enabling Infrastructure Due Diligence Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Port Lands Flood Protection and Enabling Infrastructure Due Diligence Report ComprehensiveComprehensive Planning Planning Process Process recommendedrecommended option – option 4ws realigned – 4ws realigned ComprehensiveComprehensive Planning Planning Process Process &9"UUBDINFOU1BSU OpenOpen Space Space recommendedrecommended option – option 4ws realigned – 4ws realigned Comprehensive Planning Process 2003 - Central Waterfront Secondary Plan 2007 - Design Competition MVVA 2003 2003 Winning2007 Submission2007 2010 2010 May 2012 May 2012 August 2012August 2012 OpenOpen Space Space Central WaterfrontCentral Waterfront MVVA TeamMVVA Winning Team Winning DMNP EA /DMNP Framework EA / Framework Plan Plan PLAI PLAI PLAI PLAI SecondarySecondary Plan Plan CompetitionCompetition Plan Plan Preferred PreferredAlternative Alternative 4WS 4WS 4WS Realigned4WS Realigned RecommendedRecommended 4WS Realigned 4WS Realigned 11 11 recommended option – 4ws realigned Port Lands ImplementationPort Lands Implementation Strategy – Community Strategy –Meeting Community - 28 JulyMeeting 2005 - 28 July 2005 SSF&Co – NBLC SSF&Co – Dillon – NBLC – DTAH – Dillon - KCAP – DTAH - KCAP 2010 - DMNP EA / Framework Plan May 2012 - PLAI Realigned Open Space 2003 2003 2007 2007 2010 2010 May 2012 May 2012 August 2012August 2012 WEST CORKTOWN DON COMMON LANDS FLOOD DISTILLERY PROTECTION FLOOD Central Waterfront MVVA Team Winning DMNP EA / Framework Plan PLAI LANDFORM PROTECTION PLAI Central Waterfront MVVA Team Winning DMNP EA / Framework Plan DISTRICT PLAI PLAI LANDFORM PARLIMENT STREET UNDERPASS CHERRY STREET UNDERPASS SEDIMENT Secondary Plan Competition Plan Preferred Alternative 4WS 4WS RealignedLAKE SHORE BOULEVARD MANAGEMENT Recommended 4WS Realigned Secondary Plan Competition Plan Preferred Alternative 4WS 4WS Realigned AREA Recommended 4WS Realigned DON RIVER PARLIAMENT STREET QUEENS QUAY LAKE SHORE BOULEVARD KEATING CHANNEL NORTH EAST TRINITY STREET BAYFRONT GARDINER EXPRESSWAY ABOVE CHERRY STREET TRINITY MUNITION STREET NEW LAKE BRIDGE KEATING CHANNEL BRIDGE BRIDGE SHORE BRIDGE FLOW CONTROL KEATING CHANNEL PROMENADE WEIRS FOUNDRY PLAZA 11 PLAYGROUND 11 PROSPECT (0.3 H) VILLIERS STREET VILLIERS ISLAND DON ROADWAY DON MC CLEARY PROMONTORY VILLIERS ISLAND PARK PARK DISTRICT CHERRY STREET (40M ROW) STREET (40M ROW) CHERRY PRECINCT ICE MANAGEMENT AREA OLD CHERRY STREET OLD CHERRY HARBOUR PLAZA COMMISSIONERS STREET (40M ROW) RIVER PARK NORTH COMMISSIONERS MEDIA STREET BRIDGE PLAYGROUND CITY DON ROADWAY DON RIVER LINEAR PARK SOUTH CHERRY STREET BRIDGE BASIN STREET BRIDGE LAFARGE RIVER PARK SOUTH GREENWAY POLSON STREET EAST PLAYGROUND LAKE FED WETLAND POLSON STREET WEST SOUTH RIVER POLSON Port Lands ImplementationPort Lands Implementation Strategy – Community Strategy –Meeting Community - 28 JulyMeeting 2005 - 28 July 2005 SSF&Co – NBLC SSF&Co – Dillon – NBLC – DTAH – Dillon - KCAP – DTAH - KCAP QUAY FUTURE DON WATERFRONT PROMENADE ROADWAY BRIDGE WATERFRONT PROMENADE WATERFRONT SHIP CHANNEL INNER HARBOUR WATERFRONT PROMENADE STRAUSS TRUNNION BASCULE BRIDGE FUTURE GREENWAY SOUTH PORT August 2012 - PLAI Recommended October 2015 - Refined Design - 2003 2007 2010 May 2012 Realigned August 2012 Due Diligence Central Waterfront MVVA Team Winning DMNP EA / Framework Plan PLAI PLAI Secondary Plan Competition Plan Preferred Alternative 4WS 4WS Realigned Figure 6Recommended Evolution of Plan Development 4WS Realigned 11 32 Port Lands Flood Protection and Enabling Infrastructure Due Diligence Report Port Lands Implementation Strategy – Community Meeting - 28 July 2005 SSF&Co – NBLC – Dillon – DTAH - KCAP In February of 2007, Waterfront Toronto launched proposes the route for the new river, other flood an International Design Competition, seeking protection, naturalization and city-building a master vision that recognized the need for requirements, along with the design of the Precinct an integrated solution to naturalization, flood Plan for the Keating Channel and Villiers Island protection, infrastructure and the land use neighbourhoods. potential of the area. The competition’s stated goal was to obtain a bold and comprehensive concept On September 21, 2011, Toronto City Council design and a unifying vision to guide revitalization unanimously adopted a protocol, later to be called of the Port Lands and surrounding area, merge the the Port Lands Acceleration Initiative (PLAI), to natural and urban fabric, and establish an iconic review the city’s priorities for the Port Lands. The identity for the Don River that accommodates goal of the PLAI was to refine the DMNP EA and habitat restoration and crucial flood protection. develop a business and implementation plan with In May 2007, the submission from Michael Van the objective of accelerating revitalization in the Valkenburgh Associates Inc. (MVVA) “Port Lands Port Lands and maximizing its value to the City. Estuary” was announced as the winning design. The jury felt the MVVA design of big bold moves A refinement of PLAI, PLAI 2, was initiated in impressively integrated the natural and wild 2012 and is now almost complete. It includes the elements of the river mouth and the Port Lands development of the Port Lands Framework Plan, with urban placemaking, creating a spectacular Villiers Island Precinct Plan and the Port Lands and compelling vision for the area. The submission and South of Eastern Transportation and Servicing also best addressed the competition’s two key Master Plan Environmental Assessment. The objectives of providing a naturalized mouth and findings from these three studies were presented iconic identity for the Don River, and creating a at a public meeting and consultation in November comprehensive plan for addressing urban design, 2015. Final reports are anticipated for early 2017. transportation, naturalization, sustainability and other ecological issues. As well, it was the The DMNP EA was approved in early 2015 and the most cost-effective solution and also maximized LDL MP EA came into effect concurrently. Extensive developable land. planning and design work has been done, and the Project is ready to proceed once funding is In April 2008, Waterfront Toronto, the City of received. Toronto and the Toronto Transit Commission, as tri-proponents, began a study to integrate the Once completed, the Project will achieve several Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (Class critical priorities for all orders of government: EA) process with the precinct planning process. The result was a Master Plan for transportation, • Protect against the potential loss of human water/wastewater and storm water management. life as a result of a catastrophic flooding at the This integrated planning process allowed for mouth of the Don River; work on the design of the site as a whole, and the • Reduce the financial risk to governments integration of the Project’s numerous concurrent relating to the potential loss of property and Environmental Assessments. This included the rebuilding due to flood damage, as investment Lower Don Lands Master Plan Class EA (LDL MP in flood protection infrastructure will result EA), which proposes transportation and servicing in savings equal to a multiple of the initial infrastructure necessary to support revitalization investment; and development, and the DMNP EA, which Project Background 33 • Mitigate the risk of flooding in a key part The Project creates resilient, attractive urban of Toronto through building strategic infrastructure that mitigates the flooding risk infrastructure; to governments, and unlocks a vast area for • Manage existing soil, groundwater and water revitalization and development that creates billions contaminants from historical industrial uses of dollars of economic development opportunities. and fill placement; The Project has already undergone extensive stakeholder engagement and public consultation • Contribute to a healthier Lake Ontario by over the past decade, enjoys broad public support providing important ecological systems and has secured key environmental assessment through the creation of new terrestrial and approvals from the MOECC. aquatic habitat connections. The naturalized connection of the mouth of the Don River to Lake Ontario is recognized as a key project that will contribute to the delisting of Toronto as an “Area of Concern” by Environment Canada and therefore contribute to the Remedial Action Plan objectives for water quality and habitat in Lake Ontario; • Contribute to a stronger local, regional and national economy by creating jobs and economic value through the investment in construction, residential and commercial development and other employment-generating uses; • Enable development of a strategic area in downtown Toronto to create strong and sustainable communities that will serve the city’s growing population and economy; • Deliver long-term tax revenues that flow to all orders of government; • Revitalize Toronto’s waterfront by extending the continuity of high-quality public space throughout the waterfront for the enjoyment of residents and visitors; and • Maintain Toronto’s working port. Also of importance, this Project will deliver benefits to the surrounding area through flood protecting nearby commercial and residential areas and helping to unlock the development value of the First Gulf/Unilever site, where a planned large-scale commercial development (12 million square feet, accommodating 50,000 jobs – according to First Gulf) is effectively blocked due to flood risk. 34 Port Lands Flood Protection and Enabling Infrastructure Due Diligence Report Intentionally Left Blank 35 3. Due Diligence Overview Executive
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Villiers Island Precinct Plan Community Consultation Meeting #1 Report
    Villiers Island Precinct Plan Community Consultation Meeting #1 Report Villiers Island Precinct Plan Community Consultation Meeting #1 Summary Report Prepared by Lura Consulting for: Waterfront Toronto June 2014 Villiers Island Precinct Plan Community Consultation Meeting #1 Report This report was prepared by Lura Consulting, the independent facilitator and consultation specialist for the Villiers Island Precinct Plan. If you have any questions or comments regarding the report, please contact: Amanda Santo Liz Nield Waterfront Toronto Lura Consulting 20 Bay Street, Suite 1310 505 Consumers Road, Suite 1005 Toronto, Ontario M5J 2N8 Toronto, Ontario M2J 4Z2 416-214-1344 ext. 292 416-536-6174 [email protected] [email protected] Villiers Island Precinct Plan Community Consultation Meeting #1 Report Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.0 Open House ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 3.0 Welcome and Opening Remarks ........................................................................................................................................................... 11 4.0 Presentation .......................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Enabling Rapid Transit AUTHOR: Sidewalk Labs
    Master Innovation & Development Plan Technical Appendix TITLE: Mobility Technical Appendix A: Enabling Rapid Transit AUTHOR: Sidewalk Labs ABSTRACT The Mobility Technical Appendix provides further detailed information on the mobility and street design-related proposals in the Master Development and Implementation Plan, as well as information on their potential application in the Toronto context. Most relevant sections: Vol 1 (Quayside Plan, River District Concept Plan) / Vol 2 (Mobility) © 2019 Sidewalk Labs. The content, documents and materials contained herein are considered Sidewalk Proprietary Information. Appendix A: Extending transit along the waterfront Summary ................................................................................................................................... 2 Key Components in Brief ........................................................................................................................... 2 Forces That Shaped the Plan ................................................................................................... 2 1. Observations: the necessity of, challenges to, and opportunities for extending rapid transit along the Eastern Waterfront ...................................................................................................... 3 2. Furthering the objectives of existing policies and plans ............................................................... 7 3. Public and expert input .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Paradise Lost
    PARADISE LOST AFTER THE FLOOD; CAN TORONTO ISLANDS BE SAVED FROM THE NEXT DISASTER? The island flood of 2017 is a clear warning that we must do all we can to ­preserve the closest thing to wilderness that we have in Toronto BY RICHARD LONGLEY SEPTEMBER 13, 2017 IMAGES BY SEAN TAMBLYN NOW MAGAZINE Seneca­Pump The flood waters had only begun to subside, but over the August long weekend, the Ward’s Island Association annual Summer Gala was in full swing beside the Ward’s Island Clubhouse. The band played, and attendees wore T-shirts that read “I Survived the Flood of 2017.” “We laughed, we drank beer on the bowling green,” says long-time Island resident Jay Bascom. “We’d survived adversity in the past and we knew we could survive it again.”A veteran of the floods of 1952, 1973, 1993 and 2017 – as well as the “40 years war” waged by the former Metro Council to evict Island residents – Bascom is a living testament to the resilience of the Toronto Islanders. For the 20,000 people who visit them on sunny summer weekends, the Toronto Islands are a lotus land of meadows, woods, lagoons and sandy beaches (one of them clothing optional). But for the 800 residents, 30 businesses and two schools that call the islands home, it isn’t always paradise. The weather can blast, flood and ice them in from the mainland. The land they live on is nothing more than a bump in a watery sandbox that’s slowly sinking out from under itself.
    [Show full text]
  • TO-Sidewalk-Labs-Vision-Sections-Of-RFP-Submission-Sm.Pdf
    October 17, 2017 Since its inception, Sidewalk Labs has been conducting a thought experiment with leading urbanists and technologists about what the city of the future might look like— and scouring the globe for a place to bring it to life. In March 2017, Waterfront Toronto issued Request for Proposals No. 2017-13, a call for an innovation and funding partner for Toronto’s Eastern Waterfront. After all of our searching, we knew this was the perfect place, and the perfect partner. Our response to Waterfront Toronto’s RFP represented a snapshot in time of our ideas about how to create a place that deployed emerging technology and people-first design innovations to address the challenges that face growing cities—and how we might realize this vision on Toronto’s Eastern Waterfront. We’ve decided to release the vision we laid out in our response, both in the interest of transparency and to start what promises to be a history-making public conversation. We hope all Torontonians—and city-lovers far and wide—will join in. Which urban challenges are most urgent? Where can technology prove useful in finding solutions, and where is it not the right tool? Which of our ideas are great, which are crazy, and what did we miss? We need your ideas, your aspirations, your critiques, your concerns. We hope you’ll email us, call us, tweet at us, and, if possible, join us in person at a series of public conversations, beginning with a Community Town Hall in early November. We couldn’t be more honored to have been selected by Waterfront Toronto to do something historic on the shore of Lake Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • Thank You for Coming to the Villiers Island Precinct Plan Community Consultation Meeting
    01 WELCOME Thank you for coming to the Villiers Island Precinct Plan Community Consultation Meeting. This meeting is part of a series of planning initiatives in the Port Lands led by Waterfront Toronto, the City of Toronto, and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. We are excited to present our work to date and have a conversation about the future of the Precinct. Tonight’s purposeDon River is to explore and define the vision and guiding principles and receive feedback on three development options for the Villiers Island Precinct. Don River Park KING STREET LAKESHORE BLVD E FRONT STREET West Go Transit Yard Donlands PARLIAMENT STREET Distillery District DON ROADWAY COMMISSIONERS STREET Film Keating Studio Channel VILLIERS STREET Precinct Precinct Keating Channel QUEENS QUAY W East Bayfront Greenway Link Ship Channel VILLIERS ISLAND PRECINCT Inner UNWIN AVENUE Harbour CHERRY STREET Urban Strategies 6:00 to 6:30 p.m. The Project Team Project Lead, Tonight’s Open House The Villiers Island Project Team consists Urban Planning and Design Agenda of a multi-disciplinary team, working in 6:30 to 6:40 p.m. collaboration with Waterfront Toronto, Arup Welcome and Introductory Remarks Transportation, Servicing and and in partnership with the City of Sustainability 6:40 to 7:25 p.m. Toronto, and the Toronto and Region Presentation of the Precinct Vision, Principles and Conservation Authority (TRCA). W. Architecture Options Landscape Design and Architecture Port of 7:25 to 7:40 p.m. Cherry Taylor Hazell Architects Toronto Questions of ClarificationBeach Heritage Conservation 7:40 to 8:30 p.m. RWDI Workshop Wind and Micro-Climate Conditions 8:30 to 8:55 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterfront Toronto
    Chapter 3 Section 3.15 Waterfront Toronto stakeholders come second to the public’s best 1.0 Summary interest. These oversight entities were given much greater authority than was given to Waterfront Toronto, making it possible for them to implement In 2002, the federal, provincial and Toronto muni- such measures as restricting building heights, creat- cipal governments established Waterfront Toronto ing large public spaces, providing public access to “to oversee all aspects of revitalization of Toronto’s the water’s edge and expropriating land in cases waterfront.” With the land along the waterfront where the intended use was not consistent with the being held by a variety of public- and private-sector overall revitalization plans. landowners, it was widely accepted that the water- Another key responsibility of an effective over- front could only be successfully revitalized if a co- seer is to watch over all work being done to ensure ordinated, well-planned approach was undertaken. it is done right, cost-effectively and on time. Water- This required that some entity be put in charge Chapter 3 • VFM Section 3.15 front Toronto never established all of the necessary to ensure that the needs of the public would be processes to do this. This may have been partly put first and foremost, so that the full potential of because it never had any real authority to stop pro- Canada’s largest city—a city by the lake—could be jects it believed were not consistent with its vision realized. That entity was Waterfront Toronto. of a world-class transformation of Toronto’s water- Successful oversight requires that the overseer front.
    [Show full text]
  • Villiers Island Precinct Plan
    Attachment 2 - Part 1 VILLIERS ISLAND PRECINCT PLAN SEPTEMBER 2017 W VILLIERS ISLANDW PRECINCT PLAN W Architecture & Landscape Architecture 08.11.15 VILLIERS ISLAND PRECINCT PLAN W Architecture & Landscape Architecture 08.11.15 Waterfront Toronto, the City of Toronto and the Villiers Island precinct planning team gratefully acknowledge the consultation and participation of representatives of the Mississaugas of New Credit First Nation in the preparation and this precinct Plan. We also thank all participant from the Stakeholder Advisory Committee and the Landowners and Users Advisory Committee for their continued input throughout the precinct planning process. SECTION 1 SETTING THE CONTEXT SECTION 2 VISION AND STRUCTURING MOVES 1.1 Overview and Purpose 1 2.1 Precinct Plan Vision 24 1.1.1 Introduction 1 1.1.2 The Port Lands Planning Framework 2 2.2 Guiding Principles 26 1.1.3 Precinct Planning 2 1.1.4 Interpretation of the Precinct Plan 2 2.3 Climate Positive Precinct 27 1.1.5 Structure of the Document 3 2.3.1 Climate Positive Framework 27 1.2 Planning Policy Context 5 2.4 Villiers Island Development Plan 28 1.2.1 Provincial Policy Statement 5 1.2.2 The Growth Plan 5 2.5 Structuring Moves 30 1.2.3 City of Toronto Official Plan 5 1.2.4 Making Waves – Central Waterfront Secondary Plan 6 2.6 Character Areas 32 1.2.5 Port Lands Planning Framework 6 2.6.1 Keating Channel Promenade and Old Cherry Street 35 1.2.6 Don Mouth Naturalization and Port Lands Flood Protection EA and 2.6.2 Harbourside and New Cherry Street 41 Lower Don Lands Infrastructure
    [Show full text]
  • Port Lands Flood Protection & Enabling
    Port Lands Flood Protection & Enabling Infrastructure Design Review Submission Phase 2 12 April 2018 DRAFTMVVA Inc. • WSP • DTAH Design Review Panel Comments ● Ensure a strong presence of public realm throughout ROW’s (leading with landscape). ● Within the 40 m ROW there is opportunity to achieve a very good landscape best practices vs. innovation. ● There is concern over the ROW widths being too wide and verging on having a suburban character. ● Think about what is innovative with the design and what makes it different. ● A better understanding of how this is going to look, feel, and work (cross sections) is required. ● Ensure the streets integrate well into Villiers Island. ● Find a roleDRAFT for public art within the design. Design Advancement: 4 Strategies ● Reconnect the Port Lands to Toronto’s regional road and bike network ● Program Opportunities for Innovative Sustainability and Resilience Strategies ● Clarify the identity of the Villiers Island public realm ● Develop a site-specific character for each major thoroughfare DRAFT 1. Reconnect the Port Lands to Toronto’s Regional Road and Bike Network DRAFT Existing Connective Roadways Expanded Port Lands Connectivity Dundas St E Dundas St E Leslie St Leslie St Leslie Sumach St Sumach St Sumach Broadview Ave Broadview Ave Broadview Carlaw Ave Queen St E Carlaw Ave Queen St E Don Valley Pkwy Parliament St Parliament Eastern Ave Eastern Ave Lake Shore Blvd E Lake Shore Blvd E Commissioners St Commissioners St Don Roadway Don Leslie st Leslie st Leslie Munition St. Munition Don Roadway
    [Show full text]
  • 324 Cherry Street & 429 Lake Shore Boulvard East
    STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 324 Cherry Street & 429 Lake Shore Boulvard East – Draft Plan of Subdivision Application – Request for Direction Report Date: May 28, 2018 To: Toronto and East York Community Council From: Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District Wards: Ward 28 – Toronto Centre-Rosedale Reference 16 271924 STE 28 SB Number: SUMMARY This report reviews the draft plan of subdivision application (16 271924 STE 28 SB) for the subject site located at 324 Cherry Street and 429 Lake Shore Boulevard East. The draft plan of subdivision application was submitted in anticipation of the Official Plan Modification and Zoning Bylaw Amendment approved by the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) on December 22, 2017. The draft plan of subdivision application was received on December 30, 2016 for 324 Cherry Street and 429 Lake Shore Boulevard East and proposes to subdivide the 5.76 hectare site into seven blocks. This application establishes the primary street network, including two new public north-south streets, two new public east- west streets, five development blocks, and two park blocks that collectively provide approximately 0.35 hectares of waterfront promenade parkland. Staff report for action – Final Report – Staff report for action – Request for Direction – 324 Cherry Street and 429 Lake Shore Boulvard East Draft Plan of Subdivison Application. 1 V.05/13 On November 27, 2017, the applicant appealed their subdivision application to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) on the grounds that the approval authority has failed to make a decision on the application within the prescribed timelines of the Planning Act. A pre-hearing conference related to this matter has yet to be scheduled by the Tribunal.
    [Show full text]
  • Uqql Initial Business Case Report Final.Docx
    City of Toronto Union Station – Queens Quay Transit Link Study Initial Business Case Final | April 1, 2019 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 265754-00 Arup Canada Inc. 2 Bloor Street East Suite 2400 Toronto ON M4W 1A8 Canada www.arup.com Document Verification Job title Union Station – Queens Quay Transit Link Study Job number 265754-00 Document title Initial Business Case File reference Document ref Revision Date Filename UQQL Initial Business Case Report v1.docx Draft 1 Mar 5, Description First draft 2019 Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Stuart Hamre Felipe Camargo Marc-Paul Gauthier Signature Draft 2 Mar 15, Filename UQQL Initial Business Case Report v2.docx 2019 Description Second draft Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Stuart Hamre Felipe Camargo Marc-Paul Gauthier Signature Final Apr 1, Filename UQQL Initial Business Case Report v3.docx 2019 Description Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Marc-Paul Gauthier Daniel Haufschild Daniel Haufschild Signature Filename Description Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Signature Issue Document Verification with Document | Final | April 1, 2019 | Arup Canada Inc. UQQL INITIAL BUSINESS CASE REPORT FINAL.DOCX City of Toronto Union Station – Queens Quay Transit Link Study Initial Business Case Contents Page 1 Executive Summary 1 2 The Case for Change 5 2.1 Problem and opportunity
    [Show full text]
  • Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Tribunal D’Appel De L’Aménagement Local
    Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Tribunal d’appel de l’aménagement local ISSUE DATE: March 08, 2021 CASE NO(S).: PL030514 The Ontario Municipal Board (the “OMB”) is continued under the name Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the “Tribunal”), and any reference to the Ontario Municipal Board or Board in any publication of the Tribunal is deemed to be a reference to the Tribunal. PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 17(36) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, C. P. 13, as amended Appellant: See Schedule “1” Subject: New Official Plan for the City of Toronto, as adopted by By-law No. 1082-2002 Municipality: City of Toronto LPAT Case No.: PL030412 LPAT File No.: PL030412 (various files see Schedule “1”) LPAT Case Name: 3C Lakeshore Inc. v. Toronto (City) PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 17(24) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, C. P. 13, as amended Appellant: See Schedule “2” Subject: Proposed Official Plan Amendment No. 257 Municipality: City of Toronto LPAT Case No.: PL030514 LPAT File No.: O030096 PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 34(19) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13, as amended Appellant: See Schedule “3” Subject: By-law No. 1049-2006 Municipality: City of Toronto LPAT Case No.: PL030514 LPAT File No.: R060297 2 PL030514 PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 22(7) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13, as amended Applicant and Appellant: 3C Lakeshore Inc. (formerly Home Depot) Subject: Request to amend the Official Plan - Failure of City of Toronto to adopt the requested amendment Existing Designation: Central and East Bayfront Proposed Designation: Site Specific (To be determined) Purpose: To permit Commercial and Residential uses Property Address/Description: 429 Lakeshore Boulevard East and 324 Cherry Street Municipality: City of Toronto Approval Authority File No.: 05 171818 STE 28 OZ LPAT Case No.: PL060106 LPAT File No.: O060034 PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 34(11) of the Planning Act, R.S.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Escribe Agenda Package
    ​ Executive Committee Meeting Agenda #7/15 July 3, 2015 9:30 A.M. HEAD OFFICE, 101 EXCHANGE AVENUE, VAUGHAN Members: Maria Augimeri Michael Di Biase David Barrow Ronald Chopowick Vincent Crisanti Glenn De Baeremaeker Chris Fonseca Jennifer Innis Colleen Jordan George Mammoliti Mike Mattos Jennifer O'Connell Pages 1. MINUTES OF MEETING #6/15, HELD ON JUNE 5, 2015 http://www.trca.on.ca/dotAsset/208219.pdf 2. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES 3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF 4. DELEGATIONS 5. PRESENTATIONS 6. CORRESPONDENCE 1 7. SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION 7.1 CITY OF PICKERING 9 Request for a Permanent Easement Lake Ontario Waterfront CFN 54047 7.2 GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011 - 2015 12 Flood Plain and Conservation Component Teefy Developments Ltd. CFN 53336 7.3 GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011 - 2015 15 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed, Shell Canada Limit CFN 54025 8. SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ACTION 8.1 HOSPICE VAUGHAN 18 Proposed Lease or Sale of Land City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, Humber River Watershed 52745 8.2 ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD HEARINGS 20 Requests for Approval to proceed to the OMB 8.3 CANADA GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL AND ITS GREATER TORONTO 30 CHAPTER Continuation of Partnership Agreement 8.4 PORT LANDS FLOOD PROTECTION AND ENABLING INFRASTRUCTURE 40 DUE DILIGENCE AND PROJECT PLANNING Award of Contract #10000581, Marine Engineering Services 8.5 MUD CREEK RESTORATION - REACH 5 (PHASE 2) - CREEK BYPASS 44 PUMPING SYSTEM Extension of Contract RSD14-103 8.6 G. ROSS LORD DAM PROJECT - BUILDING UPGRADES 46 Tender #10000576 9.
    [Show full text]