DOCSLIB.ORG

ISF Iceland Haddock Fishery

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ISF Iceland Haddock Fishery Vottunarstofan Tún ehf. Sustainable Fisheries Scheme Marine Stewardship Council Fisheries Assessment ISF Iceland Haddock Fishery Public Comment Draft Report Report on the 1 st re-assessment of the fishery Conformity Assessment Body: Vottunarstofan Tún ehf. Client: Iceland Sustainable Fisheries ehf. January 2017 Page 1 of 218 ISF Iceland Haddock fishery re-assessment – Public Comment Draft Report January 2017 Assessment Team Members / Authors: Paul A. H. Medley, Ph.D. Team Leader Geir Hønneland, Ph.D. Timothy Huntington, M.Sc. Assessment Coordinator and Secretary: Lovísa Ó. Guðmundsdóttir, M.Sc. Conformity Assessment Body: Client: Vottunarstofan Tún ehf. Iceland Sustainable Fisheries ehf. Þarabakki 3 Grandagarður 16 IS-109 Reykjavík IS-110 Reykjavík Iceland Iceland Tel.: +354 511 1330 Tel: +354 892 6628 & +354 840 6886 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Page 2 of 218 ISF Iceland Haddock fishery re-assessment – Public Comment Draft Report Contents 1 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Scope of the Assessment ........................................................................................................ 8 1.2 Assessment Team Members and Coordinator ....................................................................... 8 1.3 Outline of the Assessment ...................................................................................................... 8 1.4 Main Strengths and Weaknesses of the Assessed Fishery ..................................................... 9 1.5 Overall Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 9 1.6 Draft Determination, Conditions and Recommendations .................................................... 10 2 Authorship and Peer Reviewers .................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Team Members and Assessment Coordinator ..................................................................... 12 2.2 Peer Reviewers...................................................................................................................... 13 3 Description of the Fishery ............................................................................................................. 15 3.1 Unit(s) of Assessment (UoA) and Proposed Scope of Certification ...................................... 15 3.1.1 Units of Assessment and Proposed Units of Certification (UoC) .................................. 15 3.1.2 Final Units of Certification ............................................................................................ 16 3.1.3 Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and Catch Data ................................................................ 17 3.2 Overview of the fishery ......................................................................................................... 17 3.3 Principle One: Target Species Background ........................................................................... 19 3.3.1 Fishery Resources.......................................................................................................... 19 3.3.2 Status of the stock......................................................................................................... 19 3.3.3 Harvest Strategy ............................................................................................................ 21 3.3.4 Data and Stock Assessment .......................................................................................... 22 3.4 Principle Two: Ecosystem Background ................................................................................. 24 3.4.1 Description of the Ecosystem ....................................................................................... 24 3.4.2 Species Allocation ......................................................................................................... 26 3.4.3 Landings Profiles ........................................................................................................... 26 3.4.4 Primary Species ............................................................................................................. 36 3.4.5 Bait Species ................................................................................................................... 41 3.4.6 Secondary Species ......................................................................................................... 42 3.4.7 Endangered, Threatened and Protected Species .......................................................... 52 3.4.8 Habitats ......................................................................................................................... 55 3.4.9 Ecosystem ..................................................................................................................... 64 3.5 Principle Three: Management System Background .............................................................. 67 3.5.1 Jurisdiction .................................................................................................................... 67 3.5.2 Objectives ...................................................................................................................... 67 3.5.3 Legal basis and management set-up ............................................................................. 67 Page 3 of 218 ISF Iceland Haddock fishery re-assessment – Public Comment Draft Report 3.5.4 Stakeholders and consultation processes ..................................................................... 68 3.5.5 Enforcement and compliance ....................................................................................... 68 4 Evaluation Procedure .................................................................................................................... 70 4.1 Harmonised Fishery Assessment .......................................................................................... 70 4.2 Previous assessments ........................................................................................................... 70 4.3 Assessment Methodologies .................................................................................................. 70 4.4 Evaluation Processes and Techniques .................................................................................. 70 4.4.1 Site Visits .............................................................................................................................. 70 4.4.2 Consultations ....................................................................................................................... 70 4.4.3 Evaluation Techniques ......................................................................................................... 71 5 Traceability .................................................................................................................................... 73 5.1 Eligibility Date ....................................................................................................................... 73 5.2 Traceability within the Fishery .............................................................................................. 73 5.3 Eligibility to Enter Further Chains of Custody ....................................................................... 75 6 Evaluation Results ......................................................................................................................... 77 6.1 Principle Level Scores ............................................................................................................ 77 6.2 Summary of PI Level Scores .................................................................................................. 78 6.3 Summary of Conditions ......................................................................................................... 79 6.4 Recommendations ................................................................................................................ 80 6.5 Determination, Formal Conclusion and Agreement ............................................................. 81 7 References .................................................................................................................................... 82 Appendix 1: Scoring and Rationales ...................................................................................................... 89 Appendix 1.1: Performance Indicator Scores and Rationale ............................................................ 89 Appendix 1.2: Risk Based Framework (RBF) Outputs ..................................................................... 163 Appendix 1.3: Conditions, Recommendations and Client Action Plan ........................................... 164 Appendix 2: Peer Review Reports ....................................................................................................... 175 Appendix 3: Stakeholder submissions ................................................................................................ 214 Appendix 4: Surveillance Frequency ................................................................................................... 215 Appendix 5: Objections Process .......................................................................................................... 218 Page 4 of 218 ISF Iceland Haddock fishery re-assessment – Public Comment Draft Report Glossary ACOM ICES´s Advisory Committee ADCAM Catch
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WKSHARK6 Report 2020
    WORKSHOP ON THE DISTRIBUTION AND BYCATCH MANAGEMENT OPTIONS OF LISTED DEEP-SEA SHARK SPECIES (WKSHARK6) VOLUME 2 | ISSUE 76 ICES SCIENTIFIC REPORTS RAPPORTS SCIENTIFIQUES DU CIEM ICES INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR THE EXPLORATION OF THE SEA CIEM CONSEIL INTERNATIONAL POUR L’EXPLORATION DE LA MER International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H.C. Andersens Boulevard 44-46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] The material in this report may be reused for non-commercial purposes using the recommended cita- tion. ICES may only grant usage rights of information, data, images, graphs, etc. of which it has owner- ship. For other third-party material cited in this report, you must contact the original copyright holder for permission. For citation of datasets or use of data to be included in other databases, please refer to the latest ICES data policy on ICES website. All extracts must be acknowledged. For other reproduction requests please contact the General Secretary. This document is the product of an expert group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the view of the Council. ISSN number: 2618-1371 I © 2020 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea ICES Scientific Reports Volume 2 | Issue 76 WORKSHOP ON THE DISTRIBUTION AND BYCATCH MANAGEMENT OP- TIONS OF LISTED DEEP-SEA SHARK SPECIES (WKSHARK6) Recommended format for purpose of citation: ICES. 2020. Workshop on the distribution and bycatch management options of listed deep-sea shark species (WKSHARK6).
    [Show full text]
  • Species Composition, Distribution and Ecology of the Demersal Fish Community Along the Norwegian Coast North of Stad Under Varying Environmental Conditions
    Species composition, distribution and ecology of the demersal fish community along the Norwegian coast north of Stad under varying environmental conditions Kristina Dypvik Skants University of Bergen Department of Biological Sciences - Marine Biology The Institute of Marine Research 1 Species composition, distribution and ecology of the demersal fish community along the Norwegian coast north of Stad under varying environmental conditions Kristina Dypvik Skants – Master thesis (M.Sc.) June 2019 Supervisor: |Anne Gro Vea Salvanes University of Bergen, Norway Co-supervisors: Arved Staby Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway Sigbjørn Mehl Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway 2 Acknowledgements First and foremost I want to thank my wonderful supervisors for all their time and commitment in helping me with this thesis. I would like to thank Anne Gro Vea Salvanes for her helpful comments and in making sure I commit to the deadlines set during the last semester of writing. Thank you to Arved Staby for all the help with the data, the (almost) monthly meetings at IMR and for always reviewing all the results I’ve sent (no matter how unfinished they’ve been). Thank you to Sigbjørn Mehl for valuable insight in the survey- design and for detailed feedback on drafts sent to you during this spring. Also, a thank you to Mikko Heino for great comments on the materials and methods and on the last draft. I would also like to thank IMR and their demersal fish research-group for the data provided for this thesis, and to the people on Johan Hjort for allowing me to join in on their annual coastal-survey in October 2018, providing me with great insight in methods used.
    [Show full text]
  • North Atlantic Batoids and Chimaeras Relevant to Fisheries Management a Pocket Guide Fao
    NORTH ATLANTIC BATOIDS AND CHIMAERAS RELEVANT TO FISHERIES MANAGEMENT A POCKET GUIDE FAO. North Atlantic Batoids and Chimaeras Relevant to Fisheries Management. A Pocket Guide. Rome, FAO. 2012. 84 cards. For feedback and questions contact: FishFinder Programme, Marine and Inland Fisheries Service (FIRF), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy. [email protected] Programme Manager: Johanne Fischer, FAO Rome, Italy Author: Matthias Stehmann, ICHTHYS, Hamburg, Germany Colour illustrations and cover: Emanuela D’Antoni, FAO Rome, Italy Scientific and technical revisers: Nicoletta De Angelis, Edoardo Mostarda, FAO Rome, Italy Digitization of distribution maps: Fabio Carocci, FAO Rome, Italy Page composition: Edoardo Mostarda, FAO Rome, Italy Produced with support of the EU. Reprint: August 2013 Thedesignations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-107365-0 (Print) E-ISBN 978-92-5-107883-9 (PDF) FAO 2012 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product.
    [Show full text]
  • Download The
    BUILDING TOOLS TO MODEL THE EFFECTS OF OCEAN ACIDIFICATION AND HOW IT SCALES FROM PHYSIOLOGY TO FISHERIES by Travis Christopher Tai B.Sc., The University of Western Ontario, 2010 M.Sc., The University of Victoria, 2014 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Oceans and Fisheries) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) September 2019 © Travis Christopher Tai, 2019 The following individuals certify that they have read, and recommend to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies for acceptance, the dissertation entitled: Building tools to model the effects of ocean acidification and how it scales from physiology to fisheries. submitted by Travis Tai in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ocean and Fisheries Examining Committee: Dr. U. Rashid Sumaila Co-supervisor Dr. William W.L. Cheung Co-supervisor Dr. Nadja Steiner Supervisory Committee Member Dr. Marie Auger-Méthé University Examiner Dr. Colin J. Brauner University Examiner Dr. Sam Dupont External Examiner Additional Supervisory Committee Members: Dr. Christopher D.G. Harley Supervisory Committee Member ii Abstract Ocean acidification is a direct consequence of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide caused by anthropogenic fossil fuel burning and is one of multiple climate-related stressors in marine environments. Understanding of how these stressors will interact to affect marine life and fisheries is limited. In this thesis, I used integrated modelling approaches to scale the effects of biophysical drivers from physiology to population dynamics and fisheries. I focused on ocean acidification and how it interacts with other main drivers such as temperature and oxygen.
    [Show full text]
  • View/Download
    RAJIFORMES (Skates) · 1 The ETYFish Project © Christopher Scharpf and Kenneth J. Lazara COMMENTS: v. 23.0 - 27 June 2021 Order RAJIFORMES Skates 4 families · 38 genera/subgenera · 303 species/subspecies Family ARHYNCHOBATIDAE Softnose Skates 14 genera/subgenera · 110 species Arhynchobatis Waite 1909 a-, without; rhynchos, snout, referring to “absence of a cartilaginous rostral”; batis, Greek for a flat fish, usually applied to a skate or ray Arhynchobatis asperrimus Waite 1909 rough, referring to skin on dorsal surface “everywhere covered with closely set spines” Atlantoraja Menni 1972 Atlanto, referring to distribution of A. castelnaui and A. cyclophora in southwestern Atlantic Ocean; raia, Latin for ray or skate Atlantoraja castelnaui (Miranda Ribeiro 1907) in honor of Francis de Laporte de Castelnau (1810-1880), French naturalist who studied the fishes of Brazil Atlantoraja cyclophora (Regan 1903) cyclo, circle; phora, to bear, referring to ocellus formed by two concentric black circles on each pectoral fin Atlantoraja platana (Günther 1880) -ana, belonging to: referring to mouth of the Río de la Plata (between Uruguay and Argentina), type locality Bathyraja Ishiyama 1958 bathy, deep, referring to deepwater habitat of B. trachouros; raia, Latin for ray or skate Subgenus Bathyraja Bathyraja abyssicola (Gilbert 1896) abyss, deep sea; -cola, dweller or inhabitant, referring to deepwater habitat (type collected at 1588 fathoms) Bathyraja aguja (Kendall & Radcliffe 1912) referring to Point Aguja, Peru, type locality Bathyraja albomaculata
    [Show full text]
  • Wkcofibyc 2021
    WORKSHOP ON FISH OF CONSERVATION AND BYCATCH RELEVANCE (WKCOFIBYC; outputs from 2020 meeting) VOLUME 3 | ISSUE 57 ICES SCIENTIFIC REPORTS RAPPORTS SCIENTIFIQUES DU CIEM ICES INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR THE EXPLORATION OF THE SEA CIEM CONSEIL INTERNATIONAL POUR L’EXPLORATION DE LA MER International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H.C. Andersens Boulevard 44-46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] ISSN number: 2618-1371 This document has been produced under the auspices of an ICES Expert Group or Committee. The contents therein do not necessarily represent the view of the Council. © 2021 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). For citation of datasets or conditions for use of data to be included in other databases, please refer to ICES data policy. ICES Scientific Reports Volume 3 | Issue 57 WORKSHOP ON FISH OF CONSERVATION AND BYCATCH RELEVANCE (WKCOFIBYC) Recommended format for purpose of citation: ICES. 2021. Workshop on Fish of Conservation and Bycatch Relevance (WKCOFIBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 3:57. 125 pp. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.8194 Editors Maurice Clarke Authors Sara Bonanomi • Archontia Chatzispyrou • Maurice Clarke • Bram Couperus • Jim Ellis • Ruth Fernández • Ailbhe Kavanagh • Allen Kingston • Vasiliki Kousteni • Evgenia Lefkaditou • Henn Ojaveer Wolfgang Nikolaus Probst •
    [Show full text]
  • Fyllas Rokke, Rajella Fyllae
    Atlas over danske saltvandsfisk Fyllas rokke Rajella fyllae (Lütken, 1887) Af Henrik Carl & Peter Rask Møller Fyllas rokke fra Skagerrak, 2020. © Henrik Carl. Projektet er finansieret af Aage V. Jensen Naturfond Alle rettigheder forbeholdes. Det er tilladt at gengive korte stykker af teksten med tydelig kilde- henvisning. Teksten bedes citeret således: Carl, H. & Møller, P.R. 2021. Fyllas rokke. I: Carl, H. & Møller, P.R. (red.). Atlas over danske saltvandsfisk. Statens Naturhistoriske Museum. Online- udgivelse, april 2021. Systematik og navngivning Arten blev oprindelig beskrevet under navnet Raja fyllae på baggrund af en enkelt fangst fra Davis Strædet i 1884, og den var kendt under dette navn indtil for nylig. Nu regnes den til slægten Rajella Stehmann, 1970, der i en årrække blev regnet som en underslægt af Raja Linnaeus, 1758. Slægten Rajella omfatter ifølge Last et al. (2016b) 18 arter, hvoraf to er kendt fra dansk farvand. Foruden Fyllas rokke drejer det sig om hvidrokken (Rajella lintea), der herhjemme kun træffes i den dybe del af Skagerrak. De to arter er ikke meget nært beslægtede, da hvidrokken udgør en søstergruppe til de resterende arter i slægten. Fyllas rokke er nærmest beslægtet med munchkin-rokken (Rajella caudaspinosa), der findes i Atlanterhavet ud for Sydafrika (Naylor et al. 2012b). Den bestand af Fyllas rokke, der findes i Skagerrak og tilstødende områder, er beskrevet som en særskilt variant Raja fyllae var. lipacantha (se Udbredelse i Danmark). Det officielle danske navn er Fyllas rokke (Carl et al. 2004). Navnet rundrokke er set brugt i ældre litteratur (Van Deurs et al. 1947), men det bruges ikke længere.
    [Show full text]
  • Chondrichthyan Fishes in the Arctic Ocean and Adjacent Seas
    Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics Department of Arctic and Marine Biology Chondrichthyan fishes in the Arctic Ocean and adjacent seas - do we know our species? — Arve Lynghammar A dissertation for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor – June 2014 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. 2 List of papers ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Summary in Norwegian ........................................................................................................................... 4 Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Aims ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 7 Systematics and taxonomy .................................................................................................................. 7 Life history .......................................................................................................................................... 8 Biogeographic scope and methods .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Set-Up of the Nordic and Barents Seas (Noba) Atlantis Model
    nr. 2/2016 HAVET Set-up of the Nordic and Barents Seas (NoBa) Atlantis model Cecilie Hansen, Mette Skern-Mauritzen, Gro I. van der Meeren, Anne Jähkel and Ken Drinkwater FISKEN OG Set-up of the Nordic and Barents Seas (NoBa) Atlantis model Cecilie Hansen, Mette Skern-Mauritzen, Gro I. van der Meeren, Anne Jähkel and Ken Drinkwater Contents Abstract………… ....................................................................................................................................................6 1 Introduction…. ................................................................................................................................................6 2 Model – groups and parameters......................................................................................................................9 2.1 Creating netcdf files for Atlantis................................................................................................................9 2.2 Biological components in NoBa, references, use and abbreviations..........................................................9 2.2.2 Bacteria............................................................................................................................................11 2.2.3 Detritus ............................................................................................................................................12 2.2.4 Dinoflagellates.................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • List of Marine Fishes of the Arctic Region Annotated with Common Names and Zoogeographic Characterizations
    List of Marine Fishes of the Arctic Region Annotated with Common Names and Zoogeographic Characterizations November 2013 . Photo: Shawn Harper, University of Alaska Fairbanks of Alaska University Harper, Shawn . Photo: Boreogadus saida Polar cod, cod, Polar Acknowledgements CAFF Designated Agencies: • Directorate for Nature Management, Trondheim, Norway • Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada • Faroese Museum of Natural History, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands (Kingdom of Denmark) • Finnish Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, Finland • Icelandic Institute of Natural History, Reykjavik, Iceland • The Ministry of Domestic Housing, Nature and Environment, Government of Greenland • Russian Federation Ministry of Natural Resources, Moscow, Russia • Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden • United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska CAFF Permanent Participant Organisations: • Aleut International Association (AIA) • Arctic Athabaskan Council (AAC) • Gwich’in Council International (GCI) • Inuit Circumpolar Council (ICC) • Russian Indigenous Peoples of the North (RAIPON) • Saami Council This publication should be cited as: Mecklenburg, C.W., I. Byrkjedal, J.S. Christiansen, O.V. Karamushko, A. Lynghammar and P. R. Møller. 2013. List of marine fishes of the arctic region annotated with common names and zoogeographic characterizations. Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna, Akureyri, Iceland. Front cover photo: Polar cod, Boreogadus saida: Shawn Harper, University of Alaska Fairbanks Layout, photographs and editing: the authors For more information please contact: CAFF International Secretariat Borgir, Nordurslod 600 Akureyri, Iceland Phone: +354 462-3350 Fax: +354 462-3390 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.caff.is ___ CAFF Designated Area Arctic Marine Fish List, 11 November 2013 List of Marine Fishes of the Arctic Region Annotated with Common Names and Zoogeographic Characterizations By: Catherine W.
    [Show full text]
  • Host - Parasites List
    www.shark-references.com Version 01.08.2012 Bibliography database of living/fossil sharks, rays and chimaeras (Chondrichtyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali) Host - Parasites List published by Jürgen Pollerspöck, Benediktinerring 34, 94569 Stephansposching, Germany ISSN: 2195-6499 Huffmanela lata Justine, 2005 © Prof. Jean-Lou Justine, Paris Protocotyle euzetmaillardi Justine, 2011 © Prof. Jean-Lou Justine, Paris 1 please send missing paper to: [email protected] www.shark-references.com Version 01.08.2012 Please support www.shark-references.com Please send me missing, not listed references! Inform me about missing parasites records! Abstract: This is the first version of an “Host - Parasites List” of cartilaginous fishes (Chondrichtyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali). This first edition records more than 1.500 different species of parasites recovered from more than 400 species of sharks, rays, skates and chimaeras. All information about the parasites are also available at http://shark-references.com/index.php/species/listValidRecent/A (weekly update). Notice: This paper is intended to be consulted for advice and information. This information has been compiled to the best of my abilities based on current knowledge and practice.Please note, however, that possible errors cannot be altogether/entirely excluded. Citation: Pollerspöck, J. (2012), Bibliography database of living/fossil sharks, rays and chimaeras (Chondrichtyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali) – Host - Parasites List -, www.shark-references.com, World Wide Web electronic publication, Version 08/2012 ISSN: 2195-6499 © Edited By: Jürgen Pollerspöck, Benediktinerring 34, D-94569 Stephansposching; Germany Acknowledgements: I am thankful to Prof. Jean-Lou Justine, Paris for the permission to use the images of the front cover and for his support.
    [Show full text]
  • Regra De Rapoport: Análises Em Diferentes Escalas Geográficas Nos Oceanos Atlântico Oeste E Pacífico Leste
    Regra de Rapoport: Análises em diferentes escalas geográficas nos oceanos Atlântico Oeste e Pacífico Leste Vanessa dos Santos Schwan Dissertação apresentada ao Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde da Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro para obtenção do grau de Mestrado em Biodiversidade Neotropical. Orientador: Lázaro Luiz Mattos Laut Co-orientador: Rafael da Rocha Fortes RIO DE JANEIRO 2016 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO ESTADO DO RIO DE JANEIRO CENTRO DE CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS E DA SAÚDE INSTITUTO DE BIOCIÊNCIAS Regra de Rapoport: Análises em diferentes escalas geográficas nos oceanos Atlântico Oeste e Pacífico Leste Aprovada em / / . BANCA EXAMINADORA ___________________________________________________________ Profo Lázaro Luiz Mattos Laut (DCN/IBIO/CCBS/UNIRIO) ___________________________________________________________ Profª Wanderson Fernandes de Carvalho (DERM/IBIO/CCBS/UNIRIO) _____________________________________________ Profª Maria Lucia Lorini (DCN/IBIO/CCBS/UNIRIO) RIO DE JANEIRO 2016 II FICHA CATALOGRÁFICA Schwan, Vanessa dos Santos Regra de Rapoport: Análises em diferentes escalas geográficas nos oceanos Atlântico Oeste e Pacífico Leste Rio de Janeiro, 2016 IX + 27 pp. Orientador(a): Lázaro Luiz Mattos Laut Co-orientador(a): Rafael da Rocha Fortes Dissertação – Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Mestrado em Biodiversidade Neotropical, 2016. 1. Amplitude de Distribuição Geográfica 2. Padrões Biogeográficos 3. Província Biogeográfica Marinha I. Schwan, Vanessa dos Santos II. Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biociências III AGRADECIMENTOS Ao meu orientador, Lázaro Laut, e meu co-orientador, Rafael da Rocha Fortes, por terem dedicado seu tempo a minha formação. A Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro e aos professores desta instituição pelo auxílio que recebi durante toda minha formação.
    [Show full text]