ISF Iceland Haddock Fishery

ISF Iceland Haddock Fishery

Vottunarstofan Tún ehf. Sustainable Fisheries Scheme Marine Stewardship Council Fisheries Assessment ISF Iceland Haddock Fishery Public Comment Draft Report Report on the 1 st re-assessment of the fishery Conformity Assessment Body: Vottunarstofan Tún ehf. Client: Iceland Sustainable Fisheries ehf. January 2017 Page 1 of 218 ISF Iceland Haddock fishery re-assessment – Public Comment Draft Report January 2017 Assessment Team Members / Authors: Paul A. H. Medley, Ph.D. Team Leader Geir Hønneland, Ph.D. Timothy Huntington, M.Sc. Assessment Coordinator and Secretary: Lovísa Ó. Guðmundsdóttir, M.Sc. Conformity Assessment Body: Client: Vottunarstofan Tún ehf. Iceland Sustainable Fisheries ehf. Þarabakki 3 Grandagarður 16 IS-109 Reykjavík IS-110 Reykjavík Iceland Iceland Tel.: +354 511 1330 Tel: +354 892 6628 & +354 840 6886 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Page 2 of 218 ISF Iceland Haddock fishery re-assessment – Public Comment Draft Report Contents 1 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Scope of the Assessment ........................................................................................................ 8 1.2 Assessment Team Members and Coordinator ....................................................................... 8 1.3 Outline of the Assessment ...................................................................................................... 8 1.4 Main Strengths and Weaknesses of the Assessed Fishery ..................................................... 9 1.5 Overall Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 9 1.6 Draft Determination, Conditions and Recommendations .................................................... 10 2 Authorship and Peer Reviewers .................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Team Members and Assessment Coordinator ..................................................................... 12 2.2 Peer Reviewers...................................................................................................................... 13 3 Description of the Fishery ............................................................................................................. 15 3.1 Unit(s) of Assessment (UoA) and Proposed Scope of Certification ...................................... 15 3.1.1 Units of Assessment and Proposed Units of Certification (UoC) .................................. 15 3.1.2 Final Units of Certification ............................................................................................ 16 3.1.3 Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and Catch Data ................................................................ 17 3.2 Overview of the fishery ......................................................................................................... 17 3.3 Principle One: Target Species Background ........................................................................... 19 3.3.1 Fishery Resources.......................................................................................................... 19 3.3.2 Status of the stock......................................................................................................... 19 3.3.3 Harvest Strategy ............................................................................................................ 21 3.3.4 Data and Stock Assessment .......................................................................................... 22 3.4 Principle Two: Ecosystem Background ................................................................................. 24 3.4.1 Description of the Ecosystem ....................................................................................... 24 3.4.2 Species Allocation ......................................................................................................... 26 3.4.3 Landings Profiles ........................................................................................................... 26 3.4.4 Primary Species ............................................................................................................. 36 3.4.5 Bait Species ................................................................................................................... 41 3.4.6 Secondary Species ......................................................................................................... 42 3.4.7 Endangered, Threatened and Protected Species .......................................................... 52 3.4.8 Habitats ......................................................................................................................... 55 3.4.9 Ecosystem ..................................................................................................................... 64 3.5 Principle Three: Management System Background .............................................................. 67 3.5.1 Jurisdiction .................................................................................................................... 67 3.5.2 Objectives ...................................................................................................................... 67 3.5.3 Legal basis and management set-up ............................................................................. 67 Page 3 of 218 ISF Iceland Haddock fishery re-assessment – Public Comment Draft Report 3.5.4 Stakeholders and consultation processes ..................................................................... 68 3.5.5 Enforcement and compliance ....................................................................................... 68 4 Evaluation Procedure .................................................................................................................... 70 4.1 Harmonised Fishery Assessment .......................................................................................... 70 4.2 Previous assessments ........................................................................................................... 70 4.3 Assessment Methodologies .................................................................................................. 70 4.4 Evaluation Processes and Techniques .................................................................................. 70 4.4.1 Site Visits .............................................................................................................................. 70 4.4.2 Consultations ....................................................................................................................... 70 4.4.3 Evaluation Techniques ......................................................................................................... 71 5 Traceability .................................................................................................................................... 73 5.1 Eligibility Date ....................................................................................................................... 73 5.2 Traceability within the Fishery .............................................................................................. 73 5.3 Eligibility to Enter Further Chains of Custody ....................................................................... 75 6 Evaluation Results ......................................................................................................................... 77 6.1 Principle Level Scores ............................................................................................................ 77 6.2 Summary of PI Level Scores .................................................................................................. 78 6.3 Summary of Conditions ......................................................................................................... 79 6.4 Recommendations ................................................................................................................ 80 6.5 Determination, Formal Conclusion and Agreement ............................................................. 81 7 References .................................................................................................................................... 82 Appendix 1: Scoring and Rationales ...................................................................................................... 89 Appendix 1.1: Performance Indicator Scores and Rationale ............................................................ 89 Appendix 1.2: Risk Based Framework (RBF) Outputs ..................................................................... 163 Appendix 1.3: Conditions, Recommendations and Client Action Plan ........................................... 164 Appendix 2: Peer Review Reports ....................................................................................................... 175 Appendix 3: Stakeholder submissions ................................................................................................ 214 Appendix 4: Surveillance Frequency ................................................................................................... 215 Appendix 5: Objections Process .......................................................................................................... 218 Page 4 of 218 ISF Iceland Haddock fishery re-assessment – Public Comment Draft Report Glossary ACOM ICES´s Advisory Committee ADCAM Catch

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    218 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us