DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report Cover 4/5/13 5:57 PM Page 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Annual Report cover 4/5/13 5:57 PM Page 1 Empowered lives. Resilient nations. ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL 2012 United Nations Development Programme S FOR THE THE FUTURE S FOR N LEARNING FROM THE PAST IRECTIO D DIRECTIONS FOR THE FUTURE AST AST P United Nations Development Programme UNDP GLOBAL THEMATIC PROGRAMME ON ANTICORRUPTION Bureau for Development Policy Democratic Governance Group FOR DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVENESS One United Nations Plaza THE FROM G N New York, NY 10017, USA I N Email: [email protected] 2012 ANNUAL REPORT Website: www.undp.org/governance LEAR LEARNING FROM THE PAST – DIRECTIONS FOR THE FUTURE UNDP Global Thematic Programme on Anti-Corruption for Development Effectiveness (PACDE) 2012 ANNUAL REPORT Editors: Phil Matsheza and Anga R Timilsina Design and layout: Valeur s.r.o. Cover photo: Panos Pictures Copyright © March 2013 United Nations Development Programme Bureau for Development Policy Democratic Governance Group One United Nations Plaza New York, NY 10017, USA Email: [email protected] Website: www.undp.org/governance ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The UNDP Global Thematic Programme on without the remarkable work and effort of our Anti-Corruption for Development Effectiveness anti-corruption colleagues at regional and (PACDE) expresses its appreciation to the country levels. donors, partners and colleagues for supporting UNDP's work on anti-corruption. We are grateful to the following UNDP anti- corruption practitioners for their contribu- PACDE is particularly grateful for the support re- tions: Arkan El-Seblani (Manager of the UNDP ceived from the Australian Agency for Interna- anti-corruption initiative in the Arab Coun- tional Development (AusAID), the Government of tries); Christianna Pangalos (Dakar RC); Norway, the Government of Finland and the Prin- Francesco Checchi (Bratislava RC); Gerardo cipality of Liechtenstein. Their financial contribu- Berthin (Panama RC); Job Ogonda (Johannes- tion has enabled UNDP to have a more sustainable burg RC) and Samuel De Jaegere (Bangkok anti-corruption programming. RC). We would like to thank the PACDE Board mem- We would also like to thank the following bers including, UNDP Regional Bureaus, Norad UNDP Country Offices for their inputs and case and AusAID, for their inputs to the draft version studies that helped to enrich this annual re- of this annual report. port: Egypt, El Salvador, Nigeria, Papua New Guinea, Ukraine, Chile, Colombia, Kosovo, the The achievements and results reflected on this Philippines, Morocco, among others. annual report would not have been possible PACDE 2012 Annual Report || 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: REPORT OVERVIEW AND INTRODUCTION 8 CHAPTER 2: REPORT ON RESULTS 18 Objective 1: Reduce corruption for MDG acceleration 18 Output 1.1: Anti-corruption integrated in the MDG Acceleration Framework (MAF) 18 Output 1.2: Sectoral approach to fight corruption implemented in health, education and water sectors 20 Output 1.3: Multi-stakeholder networks and dialogue on social accountability promoted 24 Output 1.4: Anti-corruption for women's empowerment and gender equality strengthened 29 Output 1.5: The capacity of LDCs to prevent illicit financial flows strengthened 32 Objective 2: Mainstream UNCAC and anti-corruption into national development processes 34 Output 2.1: UNCAC mainstreamed in the UN’s national-level programmes 34 Output 2.2: UNCAC implementation and going beyond the minimum processes supported 38 Output 2.3: Anti-corruption and UNCAC mainstreamed in post conflict and transitition countries 43 Objective 3: Strengthen the capacity of anti-corruption agencies 46 Output 3.1: Technical assistance provided to strengthen the capacity of selected ACAs 46 Objective 4: Mitigating corruption risks in climate change and natural resource management 50 Output 4.1: Corruption risk assessments and other anti-corruption measures integrated in REDD+ mechanisms 50 4 || PACDE 2012 Annual Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Output 4.2: Transparency and accountability integrated in the management of natural resources 52 Objective 5: Strengthening global leadership, anti-corruption advocacy and coordination 55 Output 5.1: Through increased visibility, awareness and representation, UNDP contributed to strengthening anti-corruption for development effectiveness 55 Output 5.2: Anti-corruption regional networks consolidated 62 CHAPTER 3: STRENGTHENING TRANSPARENCY, ACCOUNTABILITY AND REPORTING IN UNDP 67 Annex 1: Summary of results by output areas 72 Annex 2: Summary of PACDE expenditures in 2012 82 Annex 3: Highlights of milestones and progress on the sectoral country level pilots 83 PACDE 2012 Annual Report || 5 Lebanon ANTICORRUPTION EDUCATION, HEALTH AND WATER SECTORS The project aims to work closely with the relevant parliamentary IN SECTORS committees including, National Education and Higher Education; Public Works, Transportation, Energy and Water; and the Public (Education, Health, Water and Climate Change) Health, Labor and Social Affairs to develop sector-focused expert groups with relevant stakeholders to introduce and implement a path for reform. The project will strengthen the capacity of Lebanese Parliament to address critical reform issues as they relate to sectoral policies. Anti-corruption in REDD+ Bangladesh Developing capacity for corruption risks and social impact assessments in REDD+ Bhutan Developing Options for Kosovo Benefit Distribution and EDUCATION SECTOR Addressing Corruption Risks DRC The objective of this initiative is to provide Technical Support to scholars/students and Corruption Risk Assessment teachers/professors with the in the REDD+ process opportunity to proactively engage in enhancing Kenya corruption control in Kosovo’s education sector Conducting Institutional by making use of the online Context Analysis on REDD+ platform www.kallxo.com. Governance, Transparency Costa Rica and Corruption risks WATER SECTOR Nepal Liberia The project is intended to EDUCATION SECTOR Building approaches to address promote transparency and corruption risks and equitable accountability of the Rural sharing of REDD+ related Administrative Association of The project aims to apply benefits Aqueducts (ASADAS in sectoral approach in Spanish) to improve water governance with emphasis on the education sector and Nigeria management in Costa Rica through active involvement establish key risk factors Integrating anti-corruption and monitoring of water users. with follow-up actions into the pilot Participatory leading to strengthening Governance Assessment institutional frameworks. for REDD+ Philippines Conducting corruption risk Colombia Brazil Guinea assessment and inform the HEALTH SECTOR HEALTH SECTOR HEALTH SECTOR national REDD+ strategy Vietnam The main goal of the project is This pilot project focuses on preventing This project aims to improve to enhance the discussion of corruption in health sector among public people's access to quality Integrating anti-corruption corruption and to bring new servants of Sao Paulo’s State Health health services through into the pilot Participatory ideas to prevent it among Secretariat. The project is implemented media engagement and Governance Assessment public servants. in partnership with the State Secretariat accountability (radio, for REDD+ of Public Health. television, newspapers). Jordan Armenia China EDUCATION SECTOR EDUCATION SECTOR EDUCATION SECTOR The objective of this project is to enhance monitoring, In partnership with the Republic of UNDP China together with China Centre transparency and accountability measures in service Armenia Ministry of Education and for Comparative Politics and Economics provision in the health sector and reporting on violations Science, UNICEF and civil society, this are mapping out corruption risks in the through a web portal that provides citizens with the project aims to implement a Social higher education sector, proposing opportunity to have their voices heard and contribute Innovation Camp, including a mitigation strategies, piloting risk to monitoring service delivery in the health sector. comprehensive campaign of workshops reduction plans in selected universities to and web-based outreach. prevent corruption in this sector. Kyrgyzstan EDUCATION AND HEALTH SECTORS UNDP supports the Ministry of Health and Ministry of Education of the Kyrgyz Republic to identify the corruption risks in the procedures established for the health sector bodies to implement their functions. One of the main goals of the project is to assess corruption risk vulnerabilities in the sectors. Cambodia EDUCATION SECTOR The objective of this project is to get a better understanding on the nature and prevalence of informal fees in Cambodia and Ethiopia to identify appropriate global WATER SECTOR and regional experiences and best practices which can be applicable to the Cambodian This project seeks to contribute to context. government's efforts for improved service delivery to the citizens. Assessment of corruption risks in the water sector is being conducted to gain better insight into transparency and accountability concerns impeding service delivery in the sector, identify interventions and mechanisms to be implemented for zero tolerance for corruption in the sector. Swaziland Uganda HEALTH SECTOR EDUCATION SECTOR Philippines WATER SECTOR This project aims to increase The overall objective of the project is to efficiency and effectiveness of strengthen community participation and maternal and neonatal health oversight for transparent and accountable The objective of this project is to mitigate care service delivery
Recommended publications
  • Corruption Trends in the Middle East and North Africa Region (2007-2011)

    Corruption Trends in the Middle East and North Africa Region (2007-2011)

    www.transparency.org www.cmi.no Corruption trends in the Middle East and North Africa Region (2007-2011) Query What do anti-corruption indexes and experts say about the levels and types of corruption in MENA countries over the last five years? What are the main areas and sources of corruption? Are there specific themes and issues that are common to a number of countries? What record do governments have in tackling corruption? Are there any examples of successful anti-corruption reforms in countries in the MENA region over the past five years? We are especially interested in country based issues - rather than regional – for Egypt, Morocco, Jordan, Tunisia and Libya. Purpose Summary This Expert Answer is to assist with developing a new anti-corruption strategy in the MENA region. In Revolutions sweeping across the Middle East and particular, the donor is interested in approaches it can North Africa (MENA) region during 2011 have shone take to reduce corruption in Egypt, Morocco, Jordan, light on widespread corruption, particularly political Tunisia and Libya. The aim is to pursue effective anti- corruption in the form of stolen assets by seemingly all corruption strategies in order to contribute to peace and the deposed leaders. There also has been widespread stability in the region. evidence of prolific patronage, nepotism, and collusion between the public and private sectors that has Content contributed to the heightened levels of civil unrest and public protests. 1. Corruption trends in the MENA region (2007 – 2011) The key anti-corruption indexes — namely Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions 2. Country specific themes, issues and anti- Index, the Bertelsmann Foundation’s Transformation corruption reforms Index, Global Integrity’s Report, Freedom House’s 3.
  • Corruption Threats & International Missions

    Corruption Threats & International Missions

    PE ACE& PEACE & CONFLICT Corruption Threats & International Missions CONPractical guidance for leaders FLICT "Corruption threatens international missions, and countering it is a strategic necessity—it’s hard-nosed common sense and militaries need to know how to do it." Rear Admiral Bruce Williams Deputy Director General and Chief of Staff European Union Military Staff Foreword Corruption is a feature of all practical guidance that can be conflicts, playing a key role in used in daily work. the power-struggle between competing groups for The considerations in this resources and power. handbook will be relevant to almost all international This places mission leaders in operations and missions. a challenging situation because it means engagement with Corruption undermines corrupt entities is frequently credibility. We have no doubt inevitable. The choice is often that, with the right whether to deal with one understanding and guidance, corrupt entity, or another even mission leaders and their staffs more corrupt entity. can limit the threat corruption poses, and have a greater In places such as Afghanistan, chance of achieving stability the Democratic Republic of and security for citizens. Congo, Haiti, Iraq, and Mali, we have seen how corruption can We hope that this handbook is threaten mission success and helpful to you. We welcome all long-term stability. Yet mission feedback and comments on leaders, national officials and how it can be improved in their civilian and military staffs future editions. charged with leading, planning, and implementing international missions often lack the understanding and skills to tackle the corruption issues that can have such a devastating impact on operational goals.
  • Emerging Faces: Lawyers in Myanmar (2014)

    Emerging Faces: Lawyers in Myanmar (2014)

    ________________________________________________________________ ILAC / CEELI Institute Report: ________________________________________________________________ Emerging Faces: Lawyers in Myanmar As they emerge from decades of repression in Myanmar, lawyers are moving into the spotlight in the evolving new system. Today’s lawyers will be expected to be the guardians of personal liberty, land tenure, human rights, and freedom of expression in their country for the next several decades. ________________________________________________________________ ILAC / CEELI Institute Report: ________________________________________________________________ Emerging Faces: Report after report on the situation in Myanmar calls for the in- creased enforcement of human rights, protection of minorities, Lawyers in Myanmar cessation of “land grabs,” and safeguards for free speech. Typi- cally, such observers assume that if sufficient political changes As they emerge from decades of repression in Myanmar, lawyers are moving into the spotlight in the evolving are enacted, Burmese lawyers – like their counterparts in otherCHINA countries – will act as skilled advocates promoting and protect- new system. Today’s lawyers will be expected to be the ing the rights of the citizenry. guardians of personal liberty, land tenure, human rights, and freedom of expression in their country for the next But who are these lawyers? Are current Burmese lawyers ready several decades. MANDALAY to operate in a modern legal system based on the rule of law?KENGTUNG BAGAN TAUNGGYI MHAUKU HEHO Beginning in August 2013, the CEELI Institute and the Burma Center Prague, working in cooperation with the International TAUNGO Legal Assistance Consortium (ILAC)PYAY provided skills-based train- ing for roughly 200 Burmese lawyers through the Upper and Lower Myanmar Lawyers Networks.YANGON These trainingsBAGO focused on (RANGOON) “street lawyers” involved in the day-to-day represen-THA tation TON of ordinary Burmese citizens.
  • Enhancing the Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Agencies

    Enhancing the Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Agencies

    COMBATING ASIAN CORRUPTION: ENHANCING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ANTI-CORRUPTION AGENCIES Jon S.T. Quah* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................... 2 II. THE POLICY CONTEXTS OF ASIAN COUNTRIES ................ 8 A. Geographical Constraints ...................................................... I 0 B. Colonial Legacy .................................................................... 12 C. Economic Development ........................................................ 18 D. Population and Culture ......................................................... 20 E. Political and Legal Systems .................................................. 22 F. Difficult Governance Environment of Fragile States ........... 24 III. COMBATING CORRUPTION WITH A SINGLE ANTI- CORRUPTION AGENCY (ACA) .............................................. 26 A. Singapore's Effective Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau ( CPI B) ...................................................................... 26 B. Hong Kong's Effective Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) .................................................. 31 C. South Korea's "Toothless" ACAs ........................................ 35 IV. COMBATING CORRUPTION WITH MANY ANTI- CORRUPTION AGENCIES ....................................................... 41 A. China's Flawed A CAs .......................................................... 42 I. Reliance on Multiple A CAs ............................................. 43 2. Reliance on Anti-Corruption
  • Corruption and Good Governance in Asia

    Corruption and Good Governance in Asia

    046.qxd 9/25/2006 12:01 PM Page 1 Batch number: 1 CHECKLIST (must be completed before press) (Please cross through any items that are not applicable) Front board: Spine: Back board: ❑ Title ❑ Title ❑ ISBN ❑ Subtitle ❑ Subtitle ❑ Barcode ❑ Author/edited by ❑ Author/edited by Edited by IN ASIA AND GOOD GOVERNANCE CORRUPTION ❑ Series title ❑ Extra logo if required ❑ Extra logo if required Corruption and Good General: ❑ Book size Governance in Asia ❑ Type fit on spine Nicholas Tarling Nicholas CIRCULATED Date: SEEN BY DESK EDITOR: REVISE NEEDED Initial: Date: APPROVED FOR PRESS BY DESK EDITOR Initial: Date: Edited by Nicholas Tarling ,!7IA4BISBN 978-0-415-36904-6 Routledge studies in the modern history of Asia www.routledge.com ï an informa business PC4 Royal Demy B-format Spine back edge Corruption and Good Governance in Asia In recent years much has been said about governance and corruption in Asia, both before and after the 1997 crisis. This edited volume analyses the causes of corruption in East and Southeast Asia and considers the means of limiting and, wherever possible, eliminating the problem through better governance. Taking a country-by-country approach, the book explores the diversity in the quality of governance and patterns of corruption among countries and regions. Insightful analysis of these differences and similarities is used to argue that political will, appropriate structures and legislation, and political transparency are required if corruption is to be stopped. All these are needed along with a strategy relevant to the circumstances of the particular country concerned. This volume outlines the key principles of good governance and the policies and practices essential for their application.
  • Corruption Perceptions Index 2020

    Corruption Perceptions Index 2020

    CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2020 Transparency International is a global movement with one vision: a world in which government, business, civil society and the daily lives of people are free of corruption. With more than 100 chapters worldwide and an international secretariat in Berlin, we are leading the fight against corruption to turn this vision into reality. #cpi2020 www.transparency.org/cpi Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this report. All information was believed to be correct as of January 2021. Nevertheless, Transparency International cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts. ISBN: 978-3-96076-157-0 2021 Transparency International. Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under CC BY-ND 4.0 DE. Quotation permitted. Please contact Transparency International – [email protected] – regarding derivatives requests. CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2020 2-3 12-13 20-21 Map and results Americas Sub-Saharan Africa Peru Malawi 4-5 Honduras Zambia Executive summary Recommendations 14-15 22-23 Asia Pacific Western Europe and TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE European Union 6-7 Vanuatu Myanmar Malta Global highlights Poland 8-10 16-17 Eastern Europe & 24 COVID-19 and Central Asia Methodology corruption Serbia Health expenditure Belarus Democratic backsliding 25 Endnotes 11 18-19 Middle East & North Regional highlights Africa Lebanon Morocco TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL 180 COUNTRIES. 180 SCORES. HOW DOES YOUR COUNTRY MEASURE UP?
  • Corruption in ASEAN Regional Trends from the 2020 Global Corruption Barometer and Country Spotlights

    Corruption in ASEAN Regional Trends from the 2020 Global Corruption Barometer and Country Spotlights

    Transparency International Anti-Corruption Helpdesk Answer Corruption in ASEAN Regional trends from the 2020 Global Corruption Barometer and country spotlights Author: Jennifer Schoeberlein, [email protected] Reviewers: Matthew Jenkins, Jorum Duri, Pech Pisey and Ilham Mohamed, Transparency International Date: 24 November 2020 The countries of the ASEAN region are among the fastest growing economies in the world, and recent years have seen a significant increase in foreign direct investment and regional integration. However, despite economic growth, sustainable development in the region is hampered by severe governance shortcomings, most notably in the form of autocratic governments, low levels of accountability and highly politicised public sectors. To tackle corruption, many countries have made substantial reforms of their legal frameworks in recent years, as well as an uptick in enforcement action. Results from the 2020 edition of the Global Corruption Barometer (GCB), produced by Transparency International, indicate increasing levels of trust in governments and governmental institutions, as well as in their ability to tackle corruption challenges, and there is a drop of reported levels of bribes paid (with Thailand being a notable outlier). Despite these improvements, gaps remain in the insufficiently resourced and independent anti-corruption agencies, high levels of state capture and a lack of protection for whistleblowers. This Helpdesk Answer looks at regional trends from the GCB, and provides country overviews for Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam. Caveat: the regional trends analysed in this Helpdesk Answer are based in part on the results of the 2020 GCB, which did not include ASEAN members such as Singapore, Brunei, and Laos.
  • COUNTRY CORRUPTION RISK PROFILES Egypt

    COUNTRY CORRUPTION RISK PROFILES Egypt

    COUNTRY CORRUPTION RISK PROFILES Egypt Overview of Data Egypt presents high third-party corruption risks, with many governance indicators in the bottom third of countries worldwide. Successful FCPA enforcement actions have involved multiple cases of bribery to secure public contracts in the defense, civil engineering, and energy sectors. Corruption and Governance Indicators Egypt G7 Average Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 35 73 World Bank Control of Corruption Score 31 87 World Justice Project Rule of Law Score 36 76 Major Correlates of Corruption Nominal GDP Per Capita Percentile Rank 28 89 World Bank Government Effectiveness Score 31 89 *All indicators are scores/100 or are percentile ranks, 100=best. Some scores have been adjusted accordingly. 1-33 34-66 67-100. World Bank Enterprise Survey Responses Egypt Top 10 Countries Share of firms reporting at least one bribe request 15% 1.4% Share of firms expected to give gifts to secure government contract 14% 1.9% Share of firms expected to give gifts to officials to “get things done” 19% 1.5% Share of businesses reporting corruption is a major constraint 68% 7.5% FCPA Cases (as reported) Total FCPA Enforcement: 10 Cases ● Lockheed— Regional executives were indicted for allegedly providing significant payments to a sitting member of Egypt’s legislative assembly as a “consultant” to influence Lockheed’s USD 78M sale of transport aircraft to the Egyptian military. ● Former Bechtel Executive — An executive from a joint venture between Bechtel and an Egyptian SOE in charge of handling bid submissions allegedly established a kickback program from which he derived USD 5M by influencing more than USD 2B in contracts.
  • Enhancing the Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Agencies

    Enhancing the Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Agencies

    COMBATING ASIAN CORRUPTION: ENHANCING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ANTI-CORRUPTION AGENCIES Jon S.T. Quah* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................... 2 II. THE POLICY CONTEXTS OF ASIAN COUNTRIES ................ 8 A. Geographical Constraints ...................................................... I 0 B. Colonial Legacy .................................................................... 12 C. Economic Development ........................................................ 18 D. Population and Culture ......................................................... 20 E. Political and Legal Systems .................................................. 22 F. Difficult Governance Environment of Fragile States ........... 24 III. COMBATING CORRUPTION WITH A SINGLE ANTI- CORRUPTION AGENCY (ACA) .............................................. 26 A. Singapore's Effective Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau ( CPI B) ...................................................................... 26 B. Hong Kong's Effective Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) .................................................. 31 C. South Korea's "Toothless" ACAs ........................................ 35 IV. COMBATING CORRUPTION WITH MANY ANTI- CORRUPTION AGENCIES ....................................................... 41 A. China's Flawed A CAs .......................................................... 42 I. Reliance on Multiple A CAs ............................................. 43 2. Reliance on Anti-Corruption
  • Open Document

    Open Document

    CSR Risk Check EGYPT 21 country risk(s) have been identified • HUMAN RIGHTS & ETHICS (11) GOVERNMENT INFLUENCE (9 RISKS) This country is marked as a “high risk" country for political risks on the Aon political risk map. This is level 5 on a 1-to-6 scale. Please visit the website for more detailed information about this country. Sources: Aon, Political Risk Map, 2020 Egypt is considered to be "not free" according to the Freedom House Country List. This means that there is an oppressive regime, with regard to political rights and civil liberties. Sources: Freedom House, Freedom in the World, 2020 The political situation in Egypt remains unstable. The army, military police and central security forces use violence, which is sometimes excessive. They try to suppress new protests, which arise because demonstrators are angry and frustrated by the slow pace of political and human rights reforms. There is a reduction of personal freedoms. The president wants to stay in power longer, which undermines democracy. Sources: Hoover Institution, Challenges to stability in Egypt, 2019 According to The Africa Competitiveness Report, the most problematic risk factors for entrepreneurs in Egypt are policy instability, government instability/coups, and access to financing. Sources: World Economic Forum, The Africa Competitiveness Report, 2015 There is a major lack of control and accountability with the government in Egypt. Unfair trials are common. Read more about this in the Amnesty International report. Sources: Amnesty International, Report 2017/2018 - The state of the World's Human Rights, 2018 There are strong indications that press freedom in Egypt is very limited.
  • Motivating Business to Counter Corruption: a Practitioner

    Motivating Business to Counter Corruption: a Practitioner

    Motivating Business to Counter Corruption A Practitioner Handbook on Anti-Corruption Incentives and Sanctions About the HUMBOLDT-VIADRINA School of Governance The HUMBOLDT-VIADRINA School of Governance in Berlin was founded in 2009 by the Humboldt University of Berlin and the European University Viadrina in Frankfurt (Oder) to bring together the public and business sectors, civil society, academia, and the media. Its aim is to find practical solutions for social challenges and to contribute to sustainable democratic politics by building political consensus through multi-stakeholder cooperation. The School has a special character: it seeks to be an academically respected institution, as well as an active civil society organization that encourages public debates and long-term policy projects. © 2013 HUMBOLDT-VIADRINA School of Governance. All rights reserved. Authors: Sebastian Wegner, Jennifer Schöberlein, Sven Biermann Editor: Stephanie Debere Design: Tanja Lemke-Mahdavi The authors would like to thank the Steering Committee of this initiative for their invaluable support: Prof. Dr. Gesine Schwan, Dr. Valerie Federico-Weinzierl, Jermyn Brooks and Prof. Dr. Peter Eigen. The authors are further very grateful to Esther Pieterse for contributing to this Handbook. Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this document. All information was believed to be correct as of October 2013. Nevertheless HUMBOLDT-VIADRINA School of Governance cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts. Motivating Business to Counter Corruption Foreword Corruption is considered one of the most pressing concerns of our time. It fuels poverty and political instability, undermines sustainable economic growth and distorts fair competition.
  • Partnering in Anti-Corruption Knowledge

    Partnering in Anti-Corruption Knowledge

    A Guidance Note for Development Partners Partnering in Anti-Corruption Knowledge Using the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) for Technical Assistance and Anti-Corruption Programming ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS UNODC and UNDP express their appreciation to the donors, partners and colleagues for supporting United Nations’ work on anti-corruption. We are particularly grateful for the support received to this initiative from the UK Department for International Development (DFID). We would like to thank Fredrik Eriksson for the initial draft of this note. We would also like to acknowledge the inputs and efforts of the following UNDP and UNODC staff to develop, finalize, and publish this Guidance Note: UNODC: Brigitte Strobel-Shaw, Chief of the Conference Support Section, Corruption and Economic Crime Branch (CEB) Candice Welsch, Chief of the Implementation Support Section, CEB Tim Steele, Regional Anti-Corruption Expert for Southern and Eastern Africa, CEB Elsa Gopala-Krishnan, Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Officer, CEB Jennifer Sarvary Bradford, Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Officer, CEB UNDP: Anga Timilsina, Anti-corruption Programme Manager, Bureau for Development Policy (BDP) Phil Matsheza, Practice Leader, Democratic Governance, Asia-Pacific Regional Centre Diana Torres, Anti-corruption Research Analyst, BDP Marco Stella, Anti-Corruption Consultant, BDP CONTACTS UNODC: Brigitte Strobel-Shaw email: [email protected] UNDP: Anga Timilsina email: [email protected] Copyright © UNDP-UNODC, November 2013 All rights reserved. Design and layout: Laurie Douglas Graphic Design Printing: GSB, Inc. Partnering in Anti-Corruption Knowledge Using the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) for Technical Assistance and Anti-Corruption Programming A Guidance Note for Development Partners 2 PARTNERING IN ANTI-CORRUPTION KNOWLEDGE 150 120 90 60 30 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 1 BO SN IA AND HERZ EGOVNAI 2 CROATIA 3 SERBIA Greenland 4 MONTEN EGRO (Denmark) 5 SLOVENIA 6 THE FORMER YUGOSLAV RE PUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Alaska (U.SA.