Corruption Threats & International Missions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Corruption Threats & International Missions PE ACE& PEACE & CONFLICT Corruption Threats & International Missions CONPractical guidance for leaders FLICT "Corruption threatens international missions, and countering it is a strategic necessity—it’s hard-nosed common sense and militaries need to know how to do it." Rear Admiral Bruce Williams Deputy Director General and Chief of Staff European Union Military Staff Foreword Corruption is a feature of all practical guidance that can be conflicts, playing a key role in used in daily work. the power-struggle between competing groups for The considerations in this resources and power. handbook will be relevant to almost all international This places mission leaders in operations and missions. a challenging situation because it means engagement with Corruption undermines corrupt entities is frequently credibility. We have no doubt inevitable. The choice is often that, with the right whether to deal with one understanding and guidance, corrupt entity, or another even mission leaders and their staffs more corrupt entity. can limit the threat corruption poses, and have a greater In places such as Afghanistan, chance of achieving stability the Democratic Republic of and security for citizens. Congo, Haiti, Iraq, and Mali, we have seen how corruption can We hope that this handbook is threaten mission success and helpful to you. We welcome all long-term stability. Yet mission feedback and comments on leaders, national officials and how it can be improved in their civilian and military staffs future editions. charged with leading, planning, and implementing international missions often lack the understanding and skills to tackle the corruption issues that can have such a devastating impact on operational goals. Mark Pyman This handbook is directed at Programme Director military and civilian leadership Defence & Security Programme and their staff involved in Transparency International UK planning and carrying out September 2014 operations. It seeks to provide Contents 1. Why is corruption a threat to mission success? 7 What is corruption? 8 Corruption, unrest, and conflict 9 Transparency, accountability, and counter-corruption (TACC) 11 2. Understanding corruption risks in operations 15 The ten main corruption pathways 15 Corrupt networks 19 Corruption risks within mission forces 22 Leadership and strategy 25 3. Specific preparatory actions 35 Threat assessment 35 Intelligence 37 Force structure & personnel 42 Contracting & logistics 45 Training 49 Civil-military coordination 51 Data & metrics 52 Legal 55 4. Capacity building of host nation security forces 57 5. Existing guidance on anti-corruption from other sources 61 NATO JALLC recommendations 61 Joint and Coalition Operational Analysis Report 64 UK Land Warfare Centre: Corruption on operations guidance 67 Current doctrinal guidance 70 ISAF contracting guidance 76 Embassy of Denmark: Anti-corruption guidance note 80 6. The ten main corruption pathways 85 1. Criminal patronage networks 85 2. Factionalism 88 3. Elections 90 4. Organised crime 92 5. Narcotics 94 6. Exploitation of natural assets 97 7. Land title and expropriation 99 8. Borders 101 9. Foreign aid 103 10. Military, police, and militias 106 Abbreviations ANP Afghan National Police GONGO Government Organised Non- ANA Afghan National Army Governmental Organisation ANSF Afghan National Security Forces ISAF International Security Assistance Force AU African Union KLE Key Leader Engagement CERP Commander’s Emergency MEC Monitoring and Evaluation Committee Response Program MINUSMA United Nations Stabilisation CIMIC Civil-Military Cooperation Mission in Mali CJIATF Combined Joint Inter-Agency MOD Ministry of Defence Task Force MOI Ministry of Interior UN CMCoord United Nations Humanitarian NATO IS NATO International Staff Civil-Military Coordination NGO Non-Governmental Organisation CMI Civil-Military Interaction NNE Non-NATO Entity COIN Counter-Insurgency PDT Pre-deployment Training COPD Comprehensive Operations RSM Resolute Support Mission Planning Directive SIGAR Special Inspector General for CPN Criminal Patronage Network Afghanistan Reconstruction CTF Counter-Threat Finance Cell SIGIR Special Inspector General for Iraq DTO Drug Trafficking Organisation Reconstruction ECOWAS Economic Community of SME Subject Matter Expert West African States TACC Transparency, Accountability, EULEX EU Rule of Law Mission Counter-Corruption EUPOL European Police Mission in UN United Nations Afghanistan UNDP United Nations Development Programme FOB Forward Operating Base UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime GDP Gross Domestic Product UNOWA United Nations Office for West Africa GEMAP Governance and Economic USAID United States Agency for International Management Programme Development GIRoA Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan 'Corruption can Tranimpact achievement of mission objectives, but also the military force can contribute, largely sparunwittingly, to the rise and prevalence of corruption.' NATO Joint Advance encyLessons Learned Centre† Why is corruption a threat to 1 mission success? Corruption undermines the proper benefit from conflict seek to enrich functioning of governments by eroding their themselves further by entrenching corrupt credibility, legitimacy, and accountability. A behaviour and maintaining an unstable government that becomes paralysed by environment in which their activities are corruption is unable to provide basic more likely to prosper, e.g. protection services to its people, to pursue justice and payments or drug smuggling. maintain the rule of law and, at its worst, fails to maintain a safe and secure High levels of corruption can also environment for its citizens. It becomes a incentivise frustrated citizens to join terrorist potential target for takeover by other organisations. More directly, corruption can interests such as organised crime. enable acts of terrorism. For example, in Corruption matters in several vital ways 2013 Al Shabab terrorists were able to bribe to international missions: their way into the Westgate shopping mall in Nairobi, where their attack claimed more Corruption can perpetuate than 60 lives. conflict and instability. Corruption is often portrayed as an Corruption can deter international endemic and therefore unavoidable aspect donors and waste funds. of the cultural fabric. It is treated as a All international missions inject constraint to, but not as a key inhibitor of, substantial funding into a country, which can stability. This perspective, however, fails to be vulnerable to appropriation by local and account for the devastating impact that national powerbrokers. This fuels instability corruption has on security overall. and can significantly damage the legitimacy International missions have a greater chance of the mission both in-country and with the of success if mission leaders understand publics of donor nations. Funds may also be that corruption is often a key cause of leaked to hostile actors. Moreover, bribery conflict. It hampers development, prevents can make a difference to national the growth of a strong licit economy, and economies. In Afghanistan, the sum of daily fuels grievances between citizens, bribes was estimated in 2013 to be close to powerbrokers, and groups that are exploiting US$4 billion.1 the country’s assets. Corruption therefore undermines societal unity and increases poverty and income inequality. Corruption also prolongs conflict as those groups who 8 Corruption damages the mission’s Corruption fosters a culture of operational effectiveness and impunity rather than lawfulness. credibility. Corruption empowers those who cheat the Public perception is critical to mission system, weakens responsible actors, and success, and those involved in international can foster a culture of impunity rather than operations must avoid colluding, or culture of lawfulness. appearing to collude, with corrupt There have been positive movements in powerbrokers. This might include, for addressing corruption in post-conflict example, contracting with corrupt groups or environments around the world. Countries as individuals, or turning a blind eye to diverse as Colombia, Liberia, Mozambique, corruption amongst allies. Corruption may and Serbia have made significant progress. also mean that host nation forces receive They still rank low on a global scale, but the sub-standard equipment, soldiers remain progress they have made post-conflict unpaid, and that senior law enforcement provides a reason for optimism that the officers enrich themselves instead of doing problem of corruption can be tackled their job. successfully over time. Fighting corruption brings greater progress as citizens feel WHAT IS CORRUPTION? improvement in their lives. Corruption has been gaining more Citizens of the host nation want their daily attention in the context of international lives to improve as a result of the missions and more generally. But what is international mission. When citizens corruption? Transparency International experience less corruption on a daily basis, it defines corruption as “the abuse of is an indication that the rule of law is entrusted power for personal gain”. A fuller improving. Conversely, discontent and explanation is needed, however, if the abuses of power can pose a major challenge concept is to be understood in the context of for political systems and can drive people to international missions and operations. support criminal or armed groups. Need, greed, and opportunity Distinguishing between corruption for need and corruption for greed
Recommended publications
  • Corruption Trends in the Middle East and North Africa Region (2007-2011)
    www.transparency.org www.cmi.no Corruption trends in the Middle East and North Africa Region (2007-2011) Query What do anti-corruption indexes and experts say about the levels and types of corruption in MENA countries over the last five years? What are the main areas and sources of corruption? Are there specific themes and issues that are common to a number of countries? What record do governments have in tackling corruption? Are there any examples of successful anti-corruption reforms in countries in the MENA region over the past five years? We are especially interested in country based issues - rather than regional – for Egypt, Morocco, Jordan, Tunisia and Libya. Purpose Summary This Expert Answer is to assist with developing a new anti-corruption strategy in the MENA region. In Revolutions sweeping across the Middle East and particular, the donor is interested in approaches it can North Africa (MENA) region during 2011 have shone take to reduce corruption in Egypt, Morocco, Jordan, light on widespread corruption, particularly political Tunisia and Libya. The aim is to pursue effective anti- corruption in the form of stolen assets by seemingly all corruption strategies in order to contribute to peace and the deposed leaders. There also has been widespread stability in the region. evidence of prolific patronage, nepotism, and collusion between the public and private sectors that has Content contributed to the heightened levels of civil unrest and public protests. 1. Corruption trends in the MENA region (2007 – 2011) The key anti-corruption indexes — namely Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions 2. Country specific themes, issues and anti- Index, the Bertelsmann Foundation’s Transformation corruption reforms Index, Global Integrity’s Report, Freedom House’s 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption Perceptions Index 2020
    CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2020 Transparency International is a global movement with one vision: a world in which government, business, civil society and the daily lives of people are free of corruption. With more than 100 chapters worldwide and an international secretariat in Berlin, we are leading the fight against corruption to turn this vision into reality. #cpi2020 www.transparency.org/cpi Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this report. All information was believed to be correct as of January 2021. Nevertheless, Transparency International cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts. ISBN: 978-3-96076-157-0 2021 Transparency International. Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under CC BY-ND 4.0 DE. Quotation permitted. Please contact Transparency International – [email protected] – regarding derivatives requests. CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2020 2-3 12-13 20-21 Map and results Americas Sub-Saharan Africa Peru Malawi 4-5 Honduras Zambia Executive summary Recommendations 14-15 22-23 Asia Pacific Western Europe and TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE European Union 6-7 Vanuatu Myanmar Malta Global highlights Poland 8-10 16-17 Eastern Europe & 24 COVID-19 and Central Asia Methodology corruption Serbia Health expenditure Belarus Democratic backsliding 25 Endnotes 11 18-19 Middle East & North Regional highlights Africa Lebanon Morocco TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL 180 COUNTRIES. 180 SCORES. HOW DOES YOUR COUNTRY MEASURE UP?
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTRY CORRUPTION RISK PROFILES Egypt
    COUNTRY CORRUPTION RISK PROFILES Egypt Overview of Data Egypt presents high third-party corruption risks, with many governance indicators in the bottom third of countries worldwide. Successful FCPA enforcement actions have involved multiple cases of bribery to secure public contracts in the defense, civil engineering, and energy sectors. Corruption and Governance Indicators Egypt G7 Average Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 35 73 World Bank Control of Corruption Score 31 87 World Justice Project Rule of Law Score 36 76 Major Correlates of Corruption Nominal GDP Per Capita Percentile Rank 28 89 World Bank Government Effectiveness Score 31 89 *All indicators are scores/100 or are percentile ranks, 100=best. Some scores have been adjusted accordingly. 1-33 34-66 67-100. World Bank Enterprise Survey Responses Egypt Top 10 Countries Share of firms reporting at least one bribe request 15% 1.4% Share of firms expected to give gifts to secure government contract 14% 1.9% Share of firms expected to give gifts to officials to “get things done” 19% 1.5% Share of businesses reporting corruption is a major constraint 68% 7.5% FCPA Cases (as reported) Total FCPA Enforcement: 10 Cases ● Lockheed— Regional executives were indicted for allegedly providing significant payments to a sitting member of Egypt’s legislative assembly as a “consultant” to influence Lockheed’s USD 78M sale of transport aircraft to the Egyptian military. ● Former Bechtel Executive — An executive from a joint venture between Bechtel and an Egyptian SOE in charge of handling bid submissions allegedly established a kickback program from which he derived USD 5M by influencing more than USD 2B in contracts.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Document
    CSR Risk Check EGYPT 21 country risk(s) have been identified • HUMAN RIGHTS & ETHICS (11) GOVERNMENT INFLUENCE (9 RISKS) This country is marked as a “high risk" country for political risks on the Aon political risk map. This is level 5 on a 1-to-6 scale. Please visit the website for more detailed information about this country. Sources: Aon, Political Risk Map, 2020 Egypt is considered to be "not free" according to the Freedom House Country List. This means that there is an oppressive regime, with regard to political rights and civil liberties. Sources: Freedom House, Freedom in the World, 2020 The political situation in Egypt remains unstable. The army, military police and central security forces use violence, which is sometimes excessive. They try to suppress new protests, which arise because demonstrators are angry and frustrated by the slow pace of political and human rights reforms. There is a reduction of personal freedoms. The president wants to stay in power longer, which undermines democracy. Sources: Hoover Institution, Challenges to stability in Egypt, 2019 According to The Africa Competitiveness Report, the most problematic risk factors for entrepreneurs in Egypt are policy instability, government instability/coups, and access to financing. Sources: World Economic Forum, The Africa Competitiveness Report, 2015 There is a major lack of control and accountability with the government in Egypt. Unfair trials are common. Read more about this in the Amnesty International report. Sources: Amnesty International, Report 2017/2018 - The state of the World's Human Rights, 2018 There are strong indications that press freedom in Egypt is very limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Motivating Business to Counter Corruption: a Practitioner
    Motivating Business to Counter Corruption A Practitioner Handbook on Anti-Corruption Incentives and Sanctions About the HUMBOLDT-VIADRINA School of Governance The HUMBOLDT-VIADRINA School of Governance in Berlin was founded in 2009 by the Humboldt University of Berlin and the European University Viadrina in Frankfurt (Oder) to bring together the public and business sectors, civil society, academia, and the media. Its aim is to find practical solutions for social challenges and to contribute to sustainable democratic politics by building political consensus through multi-stakeholder cooperation. The School has a special character: it seeks to be an academically respected institution, as well as an active civil society organization that encourages public debates and long-term policy projects. © 2013 HUMBOLDT-VIADRINA School of Governance. All rights reserved. Authors: Sebastian Wegner, Jennifer Schöberlein, Sven Biermann Editor: Stephanie Debere Design: Tanja Lemke-Mahdavi The authors would like to thank the Steering Committee of this initiative for their invaluable support: Prof. Dr. Gesine Schwan, Dr. Valerie Federico-Weinzierl, Jermyn Brooks and Prof. Dr. Peter Eigen. The authors are further very grateful to Esther Pieterse for contributing to this Handbook. Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this document. All information was believed to be correct as of October 2013. Nevertheless HUMBOLDT-VIADRINA School of Governance cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts. Motivating Business to Counter Corruption Foreword Corruption is considered one of the most pressing concerns of our time. It fuels poverty and political instability, undermines sustainable economic growth and distorts fair competition.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Cover 4/5/13 5:57 PM Page 1
    Annual Report cover 4/5/13 5:57 PM Page 1 Empowered lives. Resilient nations. ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL 2012 United Nations Development Programme S FOR THE THE FUTURE S FOR N LEARNING FROM THE PAST IRECTIO D DIRECTIONS FOR THE FUTURE AST AST P United Nations Development Programme UNDP GLOBAL THEMATIC PROGRAMME ON ANTICORRUPTION Bureau for Development Policy Democratic Governance Group FOR DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVENESS One United Nations Plaza THE FROM G N New York, NY 10017, USA I N Email: [email protected] 2012 ANNUAL REPORT Website: www.undp.org/governance LEAR LEARNING FROM THE PAST – DIRECTIONS FOR THE FUTURE UNDP Global Thematic Programme on Anti-Corruption for Development Effectiveness (PACDE) 2012 ANNUAL REPORT Editors: Phil Matsheza and Anga R Timilsina Design and layout: Valeur s.r.o. Cover photo: Panos Pictures Copyright © March 2013 United Nations Development Programme Bureau for Development Policy Democratic Governance Group One United Nations Plaza New York, NY 10017, USA Email: [email protected] Website: www.undp.org/governance ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The UNDP Global Thematic Programme on without the remarkable work and effort of our Anti-Corruption for Development Effectiveness anti-corruption colleagues at regional and (PACDE) expresses its appreciation to the country levels. donors, partners and colleagues for supporting UNDP's work on anti-corruption. We are grateful to the following UNDP anti- corruption practitioners for their contribu- PACDE is particularly grateful for the support re- tions: Arkan El-Seblani (Manager of the UNDP ceived from the Australian Agency for Interna- anti-corruption initiative in the Arab Coun- tional Development (AusAID), the Government of tries); Christianna Pangalos (Dakar RC); Norway, the Government of Finland and the Prin- Francesco Checchi (Bratislava RC); Gerardo cipality of Liechtenstein.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Salience of Corruption: the Politics of Corruption During the Arab Spring
    The Political Salience of Corruption: The Politics of Corruption During the Arab Spring Eric Freeman Department of Political Science McGill University October 2015 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirement of the degree of Master of Arts in Political Science Copyright © Eric Freeman 2015 I Table of Contents Abstract Acknowledgements Figures and Tables Chapter 1: Introduction The Puzzle of Corruption’s Destabilizing Effect Literature Review Corruption and Authoritarian Stability in the MENA Literature Framing Effects Literature Post-Arab Spring Corruption Literature The Argument The Dependent Variable Independent Variable Intervening Variables Methodology Chapters to Follow Chapter 2: Tunisia Introduction The Politics of Corruption in Tunisia Type of Corruption Elite-Level Cronyism, Intermediate-Level Patronage, and Low-Level Bribery Cronyism and the Framing of Corruption The Limitations of Intermediate-Level Patronage in Tunisia Making Matter Worse: Intervening Variables that Frame Corruption Macroeconomic Conditions Conspicuous Consumption Regime Type The Political Salience of Grievances about Corruption in Tunisia Chapter 3: Morocco Introduction The Politics of Corruption in Morocco Type of Corruption: Elite-Level Cronyism Intermediate-Level Patronage and the Dense Web of Patron-Client Relations in Morocco The Efficacy of Intermediate-Level Patronage in Morocco Intervening Variables: A mixed bag of effects Macroeconomic Conditions Conspicuous
    [Show full text]
  • Governance, Corruption, and Conflict
    A STUDY GUIDE SERIES ON PEACE AND CONFLICT FOR INDEPENDENT LEARNERS AND CLASSROOM INSTRUCTORS GOVERNANCE, CORRUPTION, AND CONFLICT UNITED STATE S IN S TIT U TE OF PEACE Washington, D.C. Table of Contents 3. Preface 2 Introduction 4 Corruption 4 Corruption, Society, and Governance 9 Corruption, Conflict, and Peacebuilding 16 Conclusion 22 Glossary 23 Discussion and Investigation Activities 27 Discussion I: Introduction to Governance and Corruption 27 Discussion II: Identifying Corruption and the Role of Governance in Conflict 28 Activity I: Analyzing Recommendations 29 Activity II: Simulation 31 Resources 44 Notes 50 Study Guide Series on Peace and Conflict 1 Governance, Corruption, and Conflict “I Miss Mao” by Xiao Chi An "I have good news," Fan Xiaoli told her brother, Fan Dayi, on the phone one day in PrefaceAugust 2008 (the family's names have been changed). "I've finally found someone who can help us to send Yuanyuan to the school." TheThey international were talking about system how tohas get witnessed dramatic changes in the recent past. Questions relatingYuanyuan, to Fan how Xiaoli's and when daughter, ordinary into a citizens can stand against oppression, injustice, and abuseprestigious without junior resorting high school to in violence Guangzhou, challenge all of us to rethink our understanding of internationalChina. When test peace results and were conflict. released Asin mid academicians,- educators, practitioners, private citizens,July, Yuanyuan and students, did not do wellwhat enough is our to role in this increasingly complex global picture? What canmeet we the doschool's to nurture entrance and requirements. preserve international security and world peace? Xiaoli was as disappointed as her daughter.
    [Show full text]
  • Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2008 Persistently High Corruption in Low-Income Countries Amounts to an “Ongoing Humanitarian Disaster”
    TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL the global coalition against corruption Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2008 Persistently high corruption in low-income countries amounts to an “ongoing humanitarian disaster” Against a backdrop of continued corporate scandal, wealthy countries 2 The 2008 results backsliding too. 2 Strengthening oversight Berlin, 23 September 2008 — With countries such as Somalia and Iraq among those and accountability showing the highest levels of perceived corruption, Transparency International’s (TI) 3 Global fight against poverty 2008 Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), launched today, highlights the fatal link in the balance between poverty, failed institutions and graft. But other notable backsliders in the 2008 CPI indicate that the strength of oversight mechanisms is also at risk among the wealthiest. 3 Corporate bribery and double standards “In the poorest countries, corruption levels can mean the difference between life and death, when money for hospitals or clean water is in play,” said Huguette Labelle, Chair of 3 Fighting corruption: Transparency International. “The continuing high levels of corruption and poverty plaguing a social compact many of the world’s societies amount to an ongoing humanitarian disaster and cannot be 4 Transparency International tolerated. But even in more privileged countries, with enforcement disturbingly uneven, Corruption Perceptions a tougher approach to tackling corruption is needed.” Index 2008 The 2008 results 8 Appendix — Sources for the The Transparency International CPI measures the perceived levels of public-sector TI Corruption Perceptions corruption in a given country and is a composite index, drawing on different expert and Index 2008 business surveys. The 2008 CPI scores 180 countries (the same number as the 2007 CPI) on a scale from zero (highly corrupt) to ten (highly clean).
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption and Human Rights—Improving Accountability”
    CORRUPTION AND HUMAN RIGHTS: IMPROVING ACCOUNTABILITY HEARING BEFORE THE TOM LANTOS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED AND FOURTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JUNE 16, 2016 Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.humanrightscommission.house.gov TOM LANTOS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION JAMES P. MCGOVERN, Massachusetts, Cochairman JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania, Cochairman KEITH ELLISON, Minnesota DOUG COLLINS, Georgia JAN SCHAKOWSKY, Illinois TRENT FRANKS, Arizona JUAN VARGAS, Arizona RANDY HULTGREN, Illinois CHRIS SMITH, New Jersey KIMBERLY STANTON, Lead Democratic Fellow CARSON MIDDLETON, Lead Republican Fellow DANIEL AUM, Democratic Fellow DAVID HOWELL, Democratic Fellow STEPHANIE MELLINI, Democratic Law Clerk II C O N T E N T S WITNESSES STATEMENT OF JOHN SIFTON, DEPUTY WASHINGTON DIRECTOR, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH....................................... 10 STATEMENT OF STEPHANIE OSTFELD ACTING HEAD OF U.S. OFFICE, GLOBAL WITNESS ............................................ 17 STATEMENT OF MATTHEW MURRAY, ESQ., INTERNATIONAL LAW EXPERT .................................................................... 25 STATEMENT OF HON. MARK L. WOLF, CHAIR, INTEGRITY INITIATIVES INTERNATIONAL, AND AUTHOR OF “THE CASE FOR AN INTERNATIONAL ANT-CORRUPTION COURT” ................................................................................................. 32 LETTERS, STATEMENTS, ETC., SUBMITTED FOR THE HEARING PREPARED STATEMENT OF JOHN SIFTON .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption Perceptions Index 2019
    CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2019 Transparency International is a global movement with one vision: a world in which government, business, civil society and the daily lives of people are free of corruption. With more than 100 chapters worldwide and an international secretariat in Berlin, we are leading the fight against corruption to turn this vision into reality. #cpi2019 www.transparency.org/cpi Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this report. All information was believed to be correct as of January 2020. Nevertheless, Transparency International cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts. ISBN: 978-3-96076-134-1 2020 Transparency International. Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under CC BY-ND 4.0 DE. Quotation permitted. Please contact Transparency International – [email protected] – regarding derivatives requests. CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2019 2-3 14-15 22-23 Map and results Asia Pacific Western Europe & Indonesia European Union 4-5 Papua New Guinea Malta Executive summary Estonia Recommendations 16-17 Eastern Europe & 24-25 Central Asia Trouble at the top 6-8 Armenia Global highlights TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE Kosovo 26 Methodology 9-11 18-19 Political integrity Middle East & North 27-29 Transparency in Africa Endnotes campaign finance Tunisia Political decision-making Saudi Arabia 12-13 20-21 Americas Sub-Saharan Africa United States Angola Brazil Ghana TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL 180 COUNTRIES. 180 SCORES.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Back Our Services Rooting out Corruption in the Service Delivery Sector – Lessons for Egypt
    Taking back our services Rooting out corruption in the service delivery sector – lessons for Egypt By Rebecca Zausmer & Dixie Hawtin Global Partners and Associates, March 2012 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 3 2. The shape of corruption in the service delivery sector ...................................................... 4 2.1. Public service sector susceptible to corruption ...................................................................... 4 2.2. Types of corruption vary between countries and sectors ...................................................... 4 2.3. Actors drive corruption ........................................................................................................... 5 3. Corruption in service delivery, the corrosive effects ......................................................... 7 3.1. Financial costs ......................................................................................................................... 7 3.2. Quality of services ................................................................................................................... 8 3.3. The gap between rich and poor .............................................................................................. 8 3.4. Human development and economic growth .......................................................................... 9 3.5. Trust in government...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]