DOCSLIB.ORG

MYANMAR 2014 Ending Poverty and Boosting Shared Prosperity in a Time of Transition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Report No. 93050-MM NOVEMBER, MYANMAR 2014 Ending poverty and boosting shared prosperity in a time of transition Photo by: Ni Ni Myint/World Bank, 2014 A SYSTEMATIC COUNTRY DIAGNOSTIC World Bank Office Yangon No.57, Pyay Road (Corner of Shwe Hinthar Road) 61/2 Mile, Hlaing Township, Yangon Republic of the Union of Myanmar +95 (1) 654824 www.worldbank.org/myanmar www.facebook.com/WorldBankMyanmar ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was prepared by a World Bank Group team from the World Bank – IDA, and the International Finance Corporation (IFC) led by Khwima Nthara (Program Leader & Lead Economist) under the direct supervision of Mathew Verghis (Practice Manager, MFM) and Shubham Chaudhuri (Practice Manager, MFM & Poverty). Cath- erine Martin (Principal Strategy Officer) was the IFC’s Task Manag- er. Overall guidance was provided by Ulrich Zachau (Country Direc- tor), Abdoulaye Seck (Country Manager), Kanthan Shankar (Former Country Manager), Sudhir Shetty (Regional Chief Economist), Betty Hoffman (Former Regional Chief Economist), Constantinee Chikosi (Portfolio and Operations Manager), Julia Fraser (Practice Manag- er), Jehan Arulpragasam (Practice Manager), Hoon Sahib Soh (Op- erations Adviser), Rocio Castro (VP Adviser), Antonella Bassani (Strategy and Operations Director), Antony Gaeta (Country Program Coordinator), Maria Ionata (Former Country Program Coordinator),- Vikram Kumar (IFC Resident Representative), and Simon Andrews (Senior Manager). The report drew from thematic input notes prepared by a cross-sec- tion of Bank staff as follows: (1) Economic Growth, Structure, and Transformation: Douglas Addison (Senior Economist); (2) Poverty Diagnostics: Manohar Sharma (Senior Poverty Specialist), Min Ye Paing Hein (Poverty Specialist), Valerie Kozel (Senior Poverty Econ- omist), and Jae Kyun (Poverty Consultant); (3) State Capacity, Legiti- macy, and Trust: Shabih Mohib (Program Leader) and Nikolas Myint (Senior Social Development Specialist); (4) Conflict, Fragility, and Risks: Asbjorn Wee (Senior Operations Officer) and Nikolas Myint (Senior Social Developmeng Specialist); (5) Social Relations, Inclu- sion, and Exclusion: Andrea Woodhouse (Senior Social Development Specialist); (6) Health: Hnin Hnin Pyne (Senior Human Develop- ment Specialist); (7) Education: Lars Sondergaard (Program Lead- er); (8) Social Protection: Puja Datta (Senior Economist); (9) Gender: Pamonrat Tansanguanwong (Senior Social Development Specialist); (10) Agriculture: Sergiy Zorya (Senior Economist) and Paavo Elister (Lead Rural Development Specialist); (11) Land: Steven Jaffe (Lead Rural Development Specialist) and Keith Bell (Senior Land Policy Specialist), (12) Energy: Dejan Ostojic (Lead Energy Specialist) and Rome Chavapricha (Senior Energy Specialist); (13) Environment and Natural Resource Management: Ruxandra Floroiu (Senior En- vironmental Engineer); (14) ICT: Tenzin Domar (Program Coordi- nator); (15) Public Financial Management: Shabih Mohib (Program Leader); (16) Natural Resource Revenue Management: Edith Bowles (Consultant) and Motern Larsen (Mining Specialist); (17) Water Re- source Management: Claudia Sadoff (Lead Economist); (18) Invest- ment Climate: Nataliya Mylenko (Senior Financial Sector Specialist); (19) Financial Sector Development: James Seward (Lead Financial Sector Specialist). There were also invaluable contributions in the preparation of the document from the following team members: May Thet Zin (Coun- try Economist), Robert Taliercio (Lead Economist), Willy McCourt (Senior Public Specialist); Joel Turkewitz (Lead Public Sector Spe- cialist), Zhentu Liu (Senior Procurement Specialist); Corey Pattison (Consultant), Charles Scheider (Senior Operations Officer), Manush Hristov (Senior Counsel), Jason Pellmar (Senior Investment Officer), Thitsar Thitsar (Operations Officer), Khin Thida Maw (Operations Officer), Matt Davies (IMF) The Peer Reviewers were Shantayanan Devarajan (Chief Economist) and Tara Vishwanath (Lead Economist). The team also benefited immeasurably from interactions with Ambar Narayana (Lead Econ- omist) and Trang Van Nguyen (Senior Economist) of the SCD Advi- sory Group and Ana Revenga, Senior Director for the Poverty Global Practice. Acknowledgements are also due to the following members of the Bank’s communications team for coordinating consultations, transla- tion, and dissemination: Kyaw Soe Lynn, Shin Thandar, Anne Elicano, Carl Patrick, Paul Risley, Diana Ya-Wai Chung, and Meriem Gray. In carrying out the consultations, the Bank team benefitted from the services of the following consultants: Shona Kirkwood, Paul Donow- itz, and Sai Yarzar Htun. The following are also acknowledged for their administrative and logistical support: Maung Maung Win, Aye Me Me Htun, Aye Marlar Win, Angkanee Luangpenthong; Tasanee Chokwatana, Cecile Wodon, Lynn Yeargin, Mildred Gonsalvez, Ka- tia Nemes, and Xuemei Guo. The team would also like to express its appreciation to the Govern- ment of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar for its support and cooperation. Special thanks are due to the Minister of Finance, His Excellency U Win Shein, the Deputy Minister of Finance, His Excel- lency Lin Aung, the Director General, U Maung Maung Win and the Deputy Director General Daw Nwe Nwe Win. The team is also grate- ful to Government Officials from various Regional and State Govern- ments where consultations were held, other Government officials at the Union level, Civil Society Organizations, academics, think tanks, representatives of the private sector and development partner institu- tions for their inputs during the consultations process. 2 | WORLD BANK REPORT ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADB Asian Development Bank MOHT Ministry of Hotels and Tourism AIDS Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome MNPED Ministry of National Planning and Economic ASEAN Association of Southeast Asian Nations Development ATM Automated Teller Machine MP Member of Parliament CBM Central Bank of Myanmar MPLCS Myanmar Poverty and Living Conditions Survey CEDAW Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against MPT Myanmar Posts and Telecommunications Women MSE Microfinance Supervisory Enterprise CESD Center for Economic and Social Development MSME Micro Small Medium Enterprise CESR Comprehensive Education Sector Review NGO Non-Governmental Organization CPF Country Partnership Framework NRC National Registration Card CSO Civil Society Organization NSDS National Strategy for the Development of Statistics DB Defined Benefit NTM Non-Tariff Measures DFID Department for International Development OECD Organization for Economic Co-operation and DSA Debt Sustainability Analysis Development DTIS Diagnostic Trade Integration Study OOP Out-Of-Pocket DU Delivery Unit PEFA Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability EAP East Asia Pacific PER Public Expenditure Review EITI Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative PFM Public Financial Management EMIS Education Management Information System PPP Public-Private Partnership ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment PSC Production Sharing Contract EU European Union QSEM Qualitative Social and Economic Monitoring FAB Farmland Administration Body SABER Systems Approach for Better Education Results FDI Foreign Direct Investment SCD Systematic Country Diagnostic FESR Framework for Economic and Social Reform SEE State Economic Enterprise FIL Financial Institutions Law SEZ Special Economic Zone GDP Gross Domestic Product SIDA Swedish International Development Agency HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus SIM Social Impact Monitoring HRD Human Resource Development SLORC State Law and Order Restoration Council ICA Investment Climate Assessment SLRD Settlement and Land Records Department ICT Information and Communications Technology SME Small and Medium Enterprise IDP Internally Displaced People SMP Staff Monitored Program IFC International Finance Corporation SNA System of National Accounts IHLCA Integrated Household Living Conditions Assessment SOE State Owned Enterprise IHLCA-2 Integrated Household Living Conditions Assessment - 2 SP Social Protection ILO International Labor Organization STEPS Skills for Training, Employment, Progression and IMF International Monetary Fund Self-development INGO International Non-Governmental Organizations SWG Sector Working Group IPP Independent Power Producer TSI Trade Support Institution IRD Internal Revenue Department TVET Technical and Vocational Education and Training JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency UMEHL Union of Myanmar Economic Holdings Limited JMP Joint Monitoring Program UN United Nations KIO Kachin Independence Organization UNCTAD United Nations Conference on Trade and Development KNU Karen National Union UNDP United Nations Development Programme LSCI Liner Shipping Connectivity Index UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund LUC Land Use Certificate UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime MADB Myanmar Agricultural Development Bank USA United States of America MDRI Myanmar Development Resource Institute USD United States Dollar MEB Myanmar Economic Bank USDA United States Department of Agriculture MEC Myanmar Economic Cooperation USDP Union Solidarity and Development Party MFI Micro Finance Institution VFV Vacant, Fallow, and Virgin MIC Myanmar Investment Commission WASH Water, Sanitization and Hygiene MICS Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey WB World Bank MIGA Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency WBG World Bank Group MOE Ministry of Education WDR World Development Report MOF Ministry of Finance WHO World Health Organization MOH Ministry of Health WTO World Trade
Recommended publications
  • Emerging Faces: Lawyers in Myanmar (2014)

    Emerging Faces: Lawyers in Myanmar (2014)

    ________________________________________________________________ ILAC / CEELI Institute Report: ________________________________________________________________ Emerging Faces: Lawyers in Myanmar As they emerge from decades of repression in Myanmar, lawyers are moving into the spotlight in the evolving new system. Today’s lawyers will be expected to be the guardians of personal liberty, land tenure, human rights, and freedom of expression in their country for the next several decades. ________________________________________________________________ ILAC / CEELI Institute Report: ________________________________________________________________ Emerging Faces: Report after report on the situation in Myanmar calls for the in- creased enforcement of human rights, protection of minorities, Lawyers in Myanmar cessation of “land grabs,” and safeguards for free speech. Typi- cally, such observers assume that if sufficient political changes As they emerge from decades of repression in Myanmar, lawyers are moving into the spotlight in the evolving are enacted, Burmese lawyers – like their counterparts in otherCHINA countries – will act as skilled advocates promoting and protect- new system. Today’s lawyers will be expected to be the ing the rights of the citizenry. guardians of personal liberty, land tenure, human rights, and freedom of expression in their country for the next But who are these lawyers? Are current Burmese lawyers ready several decades. MANDALAY to operate in a modern legal system based on the rule of law?KENGTUNG BAGAN TAUNGGYI MHAUKU HEHO Beginning in August 2013, the CEELI Institute and the Burma Center Prague, working in cooperation with the International TAUNGO Legal Assistance Consortium (ILAC)PYAY provided skills-based train- ing for roughly 200 Burmese lawyers through the Upper and Lower Myanmar Lawyers Networks.YANGON These trainingsBAGO focused on (RANGOON) “street lawyers” involved in the day-to-day represen-THA tation TON of ordinary Burmese citizens.
  • Enhancing the Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Agencies

    Enhancing the Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Agencies

    COMBATING ASIAN CORRUPTION: ENHANCING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ANTI-CORRUPTION AGENCIES Jon S.T. Quah* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................... 2 II. THE POLICY CONTEXTS OF ASIAN COUNTRIES ................ 8 A. Geographical Constraints ...................................................... I 0 B. Colonial Legacy .................................................................... 12 C. Economic Development ........................................................ 18 D. Population and Culture ......................................................... 20 E. Political and Legal Systems .................................................. 22 F. Difficult Governance Environment of Fragile States ........... 24 III. COMBATING CORRUPTION WITH A SINGLE ANTI- CORRUPTION AGENCY (ACA) .............................................. 26 A. Singapore's Effective Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau ( CPI B) ...................................................................... 26 B. Hong Kong's Effective Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) .................................................. 31 C. South Korea's "Toothless" ACAs ........................................ 35 IV. COMBATING CORRUPTION WITH MANY ANTI- CORRUPTION AGENCIES ....................................................... 41 A. China's Flawed A CAs .......................................................... 42 I. Reliance on Multiple A CAs ............................................. 43 2. Reliance on Anti-Corruption
  • Research Paper 104 July 2018

    Research Paper 104 July 2018

    Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy Research Paper 104 July 2018 Food Security Policy Project (FSPP) MYANMAR’S RURAL ECONOMY: A CASE STUDY IN DELAYED TRANSFORMATION By Duncan Boughton, Nilar Aung, Ben Belton, Mateusz Filipski, David Mather, and Ellen Payongayong Food Security Policy Research Papers This Research Paper series is designed to timely disseminate research and policy analytical outputs generated by the USAID funded Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy (FSP) and its Associate Awards. The FSP project is managed by the Food Security Group (FSG) of the Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics (AFRE) at Michigan State University (MSU), and implemented in partnership with the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and the University of Pretoria (UP). Together, the MSU-IFPRI-UP consortium works with governments, researchers, and private sector stakeholders in Feed the Future focus countries in Africa and Asia to increase agricultural productivity, improve dietary diversity, and build greater resilience to challenges like climate change that affect livelihoods. The papers are aimed at researchers, policy makers, donor agencies, educators, and international development practitioners. Selected papers will be translated into French, Portuguese, or other languages. Copies of all FSP Research Papers and Policy Briefs are freely downloadable in pdf format from the following Web site: www.foodsecuritypolicy.msu.edu. Copies of all FSP papers and briefs are also submitted to the USAID Development Experience Clearing House (DEC) at: http://dec.usaid.gov/ ii AUTHORS Duncan Boughton is Professor, Ben Belton is Assistant Professor, David Mather is Assistant Professor, and Ellen Payongayong is Specialist, all with International Development, in the Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics (AFRE) at Michigan State University (MSU); Nilar Aung is a Consultant with AFRE at MSU; and Mateusz Filipski is Research Fellow with the International Food Policy Research Institute.
  • Corruption and Good Governance in Asia

    Corruption and Good Governance in Asia

    046.qxd 9/25/2006 12:01 PM Page 1 Batch number: 1 CHECKLIST (must be completed before press) (Please cross through any items that are not applicable) Front board: Spine: Back board: ❑ Title ❑ Title ❑ ISBN ❑ Subtitle ❑ Subtitle ❑ Barcode ❑ Author/edited by ❑ Author/edited by Edited by IN ASIA AND GOOD GOVERNANCE CORRUPTION ❑ Series title ❑ Extra logo if required ❑ Extra logo if required Corruption and Good General: ❑ Book size Governance in Asia ❑ Type fit on spine Nicholas Tarling Nicholas CIRCULATED Date: SEEN BY DESK EDITOR: REVISE NEEDED Initial: Date: APPROVED FOR PRESS BY DESK EDITOR Initial: Date: Edited by Nicholas Tarling ,!7IA4BISBN 978-0-415-36904-6 Routledge studies in the modern history of Asia www.routledge.com ï an informa business PC4 Royal Demy B-format Spine back edge Corruption and Good Governance in Asia In recent years much has been said about governance and corruption in Asia, both before and after the 1997 crisis. This edited volume analyses the causes of corruption in East and Southeast Asia and considers the means of limiting and, wherever possible, eliminating the problem through better governance. Taking a country-by-country approach, the book explores the diversity in the quality of governance and patterns of corruption among countries and regions. Insightful analysis of these differences and similarities is used to argue that political will, appropriate structures and legislation, and political transparency are required if corruption is to be stopped. All these are needed along with a strategy relevant to the circumstances of the particular country concerned. This volume outlines the key principles of good governance and the policies and practices essential for their application.
  • Corruption Perceptions Index 2020

    Corruption Perceptions Index 2020

    CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2020 Transparency International is a global movement with one vision: a world in which government, business, civil society and the daily lives of people are free of corruption. With more than 100 chapters worldwide and an international secretariat in Berlin, we are leading the fight against corruption to turn this vision into reality. #cpi2020 www.transparency.org/cpi Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this report. All information was believed to be correct as of January 2021. Nevertheless, Transparency International cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts. ISBN: 978-3-96076-157-0 2021 Transparency International. Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under CC BY-ND 4.0 DE. Quotation permitted. Please contact Transparency International – [email protected] – regarding derivatives requests. CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2020 2-3 12-13 20-21 Map and results Americas Sub-Saharan Africa Peru Malawi 4-5 Honduras Zambia Executive summary Recommendations 14-15 22-23 Asia Pacific Western Europe and TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE European Union 6-7 Vanuatu Myanmar Malta Global highlights Poland 8-10 16-17 Eastern Europe & 24 COVID-19 and Central Asia Methodology corruption Serbia Health expenditure Belarus Democratic backsliding 25 Endnotes 11 18-19 Middle East & North Regional highlights Africa Lebanon Morocco TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL 180 COUNTRIES. 180 SCORES. HOW DOES YOUR COUNTRY MEASURE UP?
  • Corruption in ASEAN Regional Trends from the 2020 Global Corruption Barometer and Country Spotlights

    Corruption in ASEAN Regional Trends from the 2020 Global Corruption Barometer and Country Spotlights

    Transparency International Anti-Corruption Helpdesk Answer Corruption in ASEAN Regional trends from the 2020 Global Corruption Barometer and country spotlights Author: Jennifer Schoeberlein, [email protected] Reviewers: Matthew Jenkins, Jorum Duri, Pech Pisey and Ilham Mohamed, Transparency International Date: 24 November 2020 The countries of the ASEAN region are among the fastest growing economies in the world, and recent years have seen a significant increase in foreign direct investment and regional integration. However, despite economic growth, sustainable development in the region is hampered by severe governance shortcomings, most notably in the form of autocratic governments, low levels of accountability and highly politicised public sectors. To tackle corruption, many countries have made substantial reforms of their legal frameworks in recent years, as well as an uptick in enforcement action. Results from the 2020 edition of the Global Corruption Barometer (GCB), produced by Transparency International, indicate increasing levels of trust in governments and governmental institutions, as well as in their ability to tackle corruption challenges, and there is a drop of reported levels of bribes paid (with Thailand being a notable outlier). Despite these improvements, gaps remain in the insufficiently resourced and independent anti-corruption agencies, high levels of state capture and a lack of protection for whistleblowers. This Helpdesk Answer looks at regional trends from the GCB, and provides country overviews for Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam. Caveat: the regional trends analysed in this Helpdesk Answer are based in part on the results of the 2020 GCB, which did not include ASEAN members such as Singapore, Brunei, and Laos.
  • The Impact of the Exchange Rate Unification on Trade Balance in Myanmar

    The Impact of the Exchange Rate Unification on Trade Balance in Myanmar

    THE IMPACT OF THE EXCHANGE RATE UNIFICATION ON TRADE BALANCE IN MYANMAR By WIN, Zar Kyi THESIS Submitted to KDI School of Public Policy and Management In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF PUBLIC POLICY 2016 THE IMPACT OF THE EXCHANGE RATE UNIFICATION ON TRADE BALANCE IN MYANMAR By WIN, Zar Kyi THESIS Submitted to KDI School of Public Policy and Management In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF PUBLIC POLICY 2016 Professor Jong-Il YOU THE IMPACT OF THE EXCHANGE RATE UNIFICATION ON TRADE By WIN, Zar Kyi THESIS Submitted to KDI School of Public Policy and Management In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF PUBLIC POLICY Committee in charge: Professor Jong-Il YOU, Supervisor Professor Chrysostomos TABAKIS Professor Jin Soo LEE Approval as of December, 2016 ABSTRACT This study analyzes the impacts of the exchange rate unification on the trade balance in Myanmar based on Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) Model. This paper’s main objective is to determine whether the exchange rate has positive or negative effects on the trade balance. This study has discovered that the exchange rate unification has a positive effect on the trade balance in the long run. Additionally, this study finds that Exchange Rate and Foreign Direct Investment have positive effects on the trade balance while GDP growth rate and Inflation has negative impact in the long run. As a policy implication, this study suggests that the government should focus on economic stability and effective monetary policies within the country.
  • Enhancing the Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Agencies

    Enhancing the Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Agencies

    COMBATING ASIAN CORRUPTION: ENHANCING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ANTI-CORRUPTION AGENCIES Jon S.T. Quah* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................... 2 II. THE POLICY CONTEXTS OF ASIAN COUNTRIES ................ 8 A. Geographical Constraints ...................................................... I 0 B. Colonial Legacy .................................................................... 12 C. Economic Development ........................................................ 18 D. Population and Culture ......................................................... 20 E. Political and Legal Systems .................................................. 22 F. Difficult Governance Environment of Fragile States ........... 24 III. COMBATING CORRUPTION WITH A SINGLE ANTI- CORRUPTION AGENCY (ACA) .............................................. 26 A. Singapore's Effective Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau ( CPI B) ...................................................................... 26 B. Hong Kong's Effective Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) .................................................. 31 C. South Korea's "Toothless" ACAs ........................................ 35 IV. COMBATING CORRUPTION WITH MANY ANTI- CORRUPTION AGENCIES ....................................................... 41 A. China's Flawed A CAs .......................................................... 42 I. Reliance on Multiple A CAs ............................................. 43 2. Reliance on Anti-Corruption
  • Ids Working Paper

    Ids Working Paper

    IDS WORKING PAPER Volume 2018 No 513 Energy Protests in Fragile Settings: The Unruly Politics of Provisions in Egypt, Myanmar, Mozambique, Nigeria, Pakistan, and Zimbabwe, 2007 –2017 Naomi Hossain with Fatai Aremu, Andy Buschmann, Egidio Chaimite, Simbarashe Gukurume, Umair Javed, Edson da Luz (aka Azagaia), Ayobami Ojebode, Marjoke Oosterom, Olivia Marston, Alex Shankland, Mariz Tadros, and Kátia Taela June 2018 Action for Empowerment and Accountability Research Programme In a world shaped by rapid change, the Action for Empowerment and Accountability Research programme focuses on fragile, conflict and violence affected settings to ask how social and political action for empowerment and accountability emerges in these contexts, what pathways it takes, and what impacts it has. A4EA is implemented by a consortium consisting of: the Institute of Development Studies (IDS), the Accountability Research Center (ARC), the Collective for Social Science Research (CSSR), the Institute of Development and Economic Alternatives (IDEAS), Itad, Oxfam GB, and the Partnership for African Social and Governance Research (PASGR). Research focuses on five countries: Egypt, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nigeria, and Pakistan. A4EA is funded by UK aid from the UK government. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the official policies of our funder. Energy Protests in Fragile Settings: The Unruly Politics of Provisions in Egypt, Myanmar, Mozambique, Nigeria, Pakistan, and Zimbabwe, 2007–2017 Naomi Hossain with Fatai Aremu, Andy Buschmann, Egidio Chaimite, Simbarashe Gukurume, Umair Javed, Edson da Luz (aka Azagaia), Ayobami Ojebode, Marjoke Oosterom, Olivia Marston, Alex Shankland, Mariz Tadros, and Kátia Taela IDS Working Paper 513 © Institute of Development Studies 2018 ISSN: 2040-0209 ISBN: 978-1-78118-449-3 A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library.
  • Sample Chapter

    Sample Chapter

    lex rieffel 1 The Moment Change is in the air, although it may reflect hope more than reality. The political landscape of Myanmar has been all but frozen since 1990, when the nationwide election was won by the National League for Democ- racy (NLD) led by Aung San Suu Kyi. The country’s military regime, the State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC), lost no time in repudi- ating the election results and brutally repressing all forms of political dissent. Internally, the next twenty years were marked by a carefully managed par- tial liberalization of the economy, a windfall of foreign exchange from natu- ral gas exports to Thailand, ceasefire agreements with more than a dozen armed ethnic minorities scattered along the country’s borders with Thailand, China, and India, and one of the world’s longest constitutional conventions. Externally, these twenty years saw Myanmar’s membership in the Associa- tion of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), several forms of engagement by its ASEAN partners and other Asian neighbors designed to bring about an end to the internal conflict and put the economy on a high-growth path, escalating sanctions by the United States and Europe to protest the military regime’s well-documented human rights abuses and repressive governance, and the rise of China as a global power. At the beginning of 2008, the landscape began to thaw when Myanmar’s ruling generals, now calling themselves the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC), announced a referendum to be held in May on a new con- stitution, with elections to follow in 2010.
  • Partnering in Anti-Corruption Knowledge

    Partnering in Anti-Corruption Knowledge

    A Guidance Note for Development Partners Partnering in Anti-Corruption Knowledge Using the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) for Technical Assistance and Anti-Corruption Programming ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS UNODC and UNDP express their appreciation to the donors, partners and colleagues for supporting United Nations’ work on anti-corruption. We are particularly grateful for the support received to this initiative from the UK Department for International Development (DFID). We would like to thank Fredrik Eriksson for the initial draft of this note. We would also like to acknowledge the inputs and efforts of the following UNDP and UNODC staff to develop, finalize, and publish this Guidance Note: UNODC: Brigitte Strobel-Shaw, Chief of the Conference Support Section, Corruption and Economic Crime Branch (CEB) Candice Welsch, Chief of the Implementation Support Section, CEB Tim Steele, Regional Anti-Corruption Expert for Southern and Eastern Africa, CEB Elsa Gopala-Krishnan, Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Officer, CEB Jennifer Sarvary Bradford, Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Officer, CEB UNDP: Anga Timilsina, Anti-corruption Programme Manager, Bureau for Development Policy (BDP) Phil Matsheza, Practice Leader, Democratic Governance, Asia-Pacific Regional Centre Diana Torres, Anti-corruption Research Analyst, BDP Marco Stella, Anti-Corruption Consultant, BDP CONTACTS UNODC: Brigitte Strobel-Shaw email: [email protected] UNDP: Anga Timilsina email: [email protected] Copyright © UNDP-UNODC, November 2013 All rights reserved. Design and layout: Laurie Douglas Graphic Design Printing: GSB, Inc. Partnering in Anti-Corruption Knowledge Using the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) for Technical Assistance and Anti-Corruption Programming A Guidance Note for Development Partners 2 PARTNERING IN ANTI-CORRUPTION KNOWLEDGE 150 120 90 60 30 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 1 BO SN IA AND HERZ EGOVNAI 2 CROATIA 3 SERBIA Greenland 4 MONTEN EGRO (Denmark) 5 SLOVENIA 6 THE FORMER YUGOSLAV RE PUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Alaska (U.SA.
  • CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT for MYANMAR 2018 – 1 of 178 –

    CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT for MYANMAR 2018 – 1 of 178 –

    Centralized National Risk Assessment for Myanmar FSC-CNRA-MM V1-0 EN FSC-CNRA-MM V1-0 CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR MYANMAR 2018 – 1 of 178 – Title: Centralized National Risk Assessment for Myanmar Document reference FSC-CNRA-MM V1-0 EN code: Approval body: FSC International Center: Performance and Standards Unit Date of approval: 27 August 2018 Contact for comments: FSC International Center - Performance and Standards Unit - Adenauerallee 134 53113 Bonn, Germany +49-(0)228-36766-0 +49-(0)228-36766-30 [email protected] © 2018 Forest Stewardship Council, A.C. All rights reserved. No part of this work covered by the publisher’s copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, recording taping, or information retrieval systems) without the written permission of the publisher. Printed copies of this document are for reference only. Please refer to the electronic copy on the FSC website (ic.fsc.org) to ensure you are referring to the latest version. The Forest Stewardship Council® (FSC) is an independent, not for profit, non- government organization established to support environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world’s forests. FSC’s vision is that the world’s forests meet the social, ecological, and economic rights and needs of the present generation without compromising those of future generations. FSC-CNRA-MM V1-0 CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR MYANMAR 2018 – 2 of 178 – Contents Risk assessments that have been finalized for Myanmar .......................................... 4 Risk designations in finalized risk assessments for Myanmar ...................................