Railbanking and Rail-Trails
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
License Agreement with Gotcha Ride LLC to Operate the North County Coastal Bike Share Pilot Program in the City of Encinitas
MEETING DATE: April 17, 2019 PREPARED BY: Crystal Najera, CAP DEPT. DIRECTOR: Karen P. Brust Program Administrator DEPARTMENT: City Manager CITY MANAGER: Karen P. Brust SUBJECT: License Agreement with Gotcha Ride LLC to operate the North County Coastal Bike Share Pilot Program in the City of Encinitas. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Authorize the City Manager, in consultation with the City Attorney, to execute a license agreement with Gotcha Ride LLC (in substantial form as attached) to operate the North County Coastal Bike Share Pilot Program in the City of Encinitas (Attachment 5). STRATEGIC PLAN: This item is related to the following Strategic Plan focus areas: • Environment—promotes the use of emissions-free bicycles as an alternative mode of transportation. • Transportation—supports a transportation mode that accommodates more people with minimal impact on the community. • Recreation—promotes active lifestyles and community health. • Economic Development—addresses the “last mile” gap between public transit and local businesses and promotes tourism. FISCAL CONSIDERATIONS: There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommendation. Gotcha will bear the sole cost of deploying and operating the bike share program. Minimal City staff time will be needed to coordinate with Gotcha to ensure that the program operates in a manner beneficial to the City. BACKGROUND: Bike share is a service through which bicycles are made available for shared use to individuals on a very short-term basis, allowing them to rent a bicycle at one location and return it either at the same location or at a different location within a defined geographic boundary. Transportation, especially travel via single occupancy vehicle, is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions in Encinitas and the North County coastal region. -
Olathe's Bike Share Implementation Strategy
CITY OF OLATHE + MARC Bike Share Implementation Strategy FEBRUARY 2018 Bike Share Implementation Strategy | 1 2 | City of Olathe Acknowledgements Project Partners Advisory Committee City of Olathe John Andrade – Parks & Recreation Foundation Mid America Regional Council Tim Brady – Olathe Schools Marvin Butler – Fire Captain/Inspector Emily Carrillo – Neighborhood Planning City Staff Coordinator Mike Fields – Community Center Manager Susan Sherman – Assistant City Manager Ashley Follett – Johnson County Department of Michael Meadors – Parks & Recreation Director Health and Enviroment Brad Clay – Deputy Director Parks & Recreation Megan Foreman – Johnson County Department Shawna Davis – Management Intern of Health and Enviroment Lisa Donnelly – Park Project Planner Bubba Goeddert – Olathe Chamber of Commerce Mike Latka – Park Project Coordinator Ben Hart – Parks & Recreation Foundation Linda Voss – Sr. Traffic Engineer Katie Lange – Interpreter Specialist Matt Lee – Mid-America Nazarene University Consultant Team Laurel Lucas – Customer Service, Housing Megan Merryman – Johnson County Parks & BikeWalkKC Recreation District Alta Planning + Design Liz Newman – Sr. Horticulturist Vireo Todd Olmstead – Facility & Housing Assistant Manager Sean Pendley – Sr. Planner Kathy Rankin – Housing Services Manager Bryan Severns – K-State Olathe Jon Spence – Mid-America Nazarene University Drew Stihl – Mid-America Regional Council Brenda Volle – Program Coordinator, Housing Rob Wyrick – Olathe Health Bike Share Implementation Strategy | 3 4 | City of Olathe Table of Contents I. BACKGROUND 11 II. ANALYSIS 15 III. SYSTEM PLANNING 45 IV. IMPLEMENTATION 77 Bike Share Implementation Strategy | 5 6 | City of Olathe Executive Summary Project Goals System Options • Identify how bike share can benefit Olathe. • Bike Library: Bike libraries usually involve a fleet of bicycles that are rented out at a limited • Identify the local demand for bike share in number of staffed kiosks. -
A Contingent Trip Model for Estimating Rail-Trail Demand
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 46(l), 79-96, 2003 A Contingent Trip Model for Estimating Rail-trail Demand CARTER J. BETZ*, JOHN C. BERGSTROM+ & J, M. BOWKER* *US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station, 320 Greene Street, Athens, GA 30602-2044, USA. E-mail: [email protected] ‘Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, GA, USA ABSTRACT The authors develop a contingent trip model to estimate the recreation demand for and value of a potential rail-trail site in north-east Georgia. The contingent trip model is an alternative to travel cost modelling useful for ex ante evaluation of proposed recreation resources or management alternatives. The authors estimate the empirical demand for trips using a negative binomial regression specification. Their findings indicate a per-trip consumer surplus rangingfrom US$l8.46 to US$29.23 and a price elasticity of - 0.68. In aggregate, they estimate that the rail-trail would receive approximately 416 213 recreation visits per year by area households and account for a total consumer surplus in excess of US$7.5 million. Introduction Greenways are corridors of protected open space managed for conservation and recreation purposes (President’s Commission on Americans Outdoors (PCAO), 1986). A primary recommendation of the PCAO during the Reagan administra- tion was the development of a national network of greenways characterized by local, grassroots activism. Although greenways have existed in various forms for many years, it was not until the PCAO report and the founding of the Rails-to-trails Conservancy (RTC) in 1986 that greenways finally gained wide- spread recognition as practical and cost-efficient recreation and conservation resources. -
WWRP Funding Scenerios
Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program 2015-2017 Critical Habitat Projects Grants Awarded at Different Legislative Funding Levels Number Grant Applicant Rank and Type Project Name Grant Applicant Request Match Total $40 Million $50 Million $60 Million $70 Million $80 Million $90 Million $95 Million $97 Million 1 14-1085A Mountain View Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 2 14-1096A Simcoe Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 3 14-1087A Mid Columbia-Grand Coulee Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $1,730,000 $2,166,500 $3,476,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 4 14-1090A Heart of the Cascades Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $785,500 $2,095,000 $3,404,500 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 5 14-1091A Cowiche Watershed Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $2,200,000 $2,200,000 $59,250 $321,150 6 14-1089A Tunk Valley Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $2,000,000 $2,000,000 7 14-1099A Kettle River Corridor Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $1,000,000 $1,000,000 8 14-1609C Sage Grouse Habitat Acquisition in Deep Creek Foster Creek Conservation District $302,000 $303,152 $605,152 $20,502,000 $303,152 $20,805,152 $8,730,000 $9,166,500 $10,476,000 $11,785,500 $13,095,000 $14,404,500 $15,059,250 $15,321,150 Type Abbreviations: -
WASHINGTON STATE PARKS and RECREATION COMMISSION 1111 Israel Rd S.W
Don Hoch Director STATE OF WASHINGTON WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 1111 Israel Rd S.W. • P.O. Box 42650 • Olympia, WA 98504-2650 • (360) 902-8500 TDD (Telecommunications Device for the Deaf): (360) 664-3133 www.parks.wa.gov STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Date of Issuance: January 14, 2019 Project Name: Klickitat Trail Development Proponent: Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission Lead Agency: Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission Description of proposal: This Klickitat Trail Development project continues previous trail planning and improvement work completed by the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) and Washington State Parks. This is the first phase of a phased environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) that expands on the previous 2003 Environmental Assessment prepared by the USFS, and adopted by Washington State Parks in 2005 as the document used for the original Determination of Non-significance (DNS) to satisfy SEPA requirements. This phased review specifically addresses updated site information identified since the original review, and new information for project modifications or new projects not previously reviewed. Phase 1 of this project proposes to construct a trailhead at Pitt and resurface approximately 12 miles of trail through Swale Canyon. Work also includes minor structural repairs, new decking and railings on seven existing trestles, replacement of one trestle with a free span bridge, and removal of one existing damaged trestle in Swale Canyon. Additionally, a preliminary concept for a potential trailhead at Warwick will be completed. Location of Proposal: Project activities will occur along portions of the Klickitat State Park Trail right-of-way corridor in Klickitat County. -
Missouri Conservationist, August 2007
Missouri ConservationistVolume 68, Issue 9, sePTemBeR 2007 •Serving nature & You [Note to our readers] Answering the Call or as long as I can remember, Conservation department employees have assisted in emergency situations. staff have Ftaken action to rescue drowning, choking and accident victims. The Department and its staff are also ready to step up when natu- watercraft, firearms and other specialized equipment. Safety ral disasters strike. equipment and gear are mandated. Accidents are reviewed to After Hurricane Katrina in the fall of 2005, the Department determine how they can be avoided in the future. With the spe- answered the call for help. Sixteen conser- cialized skills of Conservation employees, vation agents and agent supervisors, with it isn’t surprising that the Department of eight boats, went to New Orleans. Search Public Safety asked us to take a much and rescue was their top priority. larger role in managing Missouri’s emer- Severe spring storms in 2006 gency response and recovery if a natural brought significant destruction to south- or technological catastrophe occurs. east Missouri. The Department aided Severe winter weather in early 2007 with both staff and equipment. Teams created an “opportunity” for us to use assisted with road cleanup and county- the Incident Command Team concept. damage assessment, and agents provided With power outages affecting thousands security detail. and massive debris blockages in several About this time, all Missouri state counties, the Department and other state agencies incorporated the National agencies quickly joined SEMA’s efforts. Incident Management System (NIMS). After severe winter weather in early Conservation employees opened roads NIMS provides a consistent approach 2007, Department employees cleared for emergency vehicles and the National for federal, state and local governments access to power lines and roads. -
Missouri Conservationist December 2020
VOLUME 81, ISSUE 12, DECEMBER 2020 MISSOURI SERVING NATURE & YOU CONSERVATIONIST MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION November/December 2020 January/February 2020 MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION July/August 2020 ANIMAL ASSASSINS THEY AIM FOR PREY THE BOING INSPIRE SOME ANIMALS TAKE ! LEAPING TO NEW LENGTHS CHILDREN MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Septem ber/October 2020 FLOWER BEES STAY BUZZYPOWER GATHERING IN YOUR LIFE POLLEN AND NECTAR March/Apri l 2019 MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION TO GET SAY OUTSIDE WHA ANIMALS DO SOME Ju ly/Au gu st 2 01 9 FUNNY THINGS T? WINTER IS COMING AND CRITTERS KNOW HOW TO COPE WITH THE COLD NO SHAD Looking for a way to coax your kids ON THEE GLADE LIFE ’S HOT IN MISSOURI to unplug, climb off the couch, and MINI DESERTS ’S get outside? Then check out Xplor, the Conservation Department’s free Don t keep the door magazine for kids and kids at heart. ’ closed any longer. Six times a year, Xplor serves up eye- popping art, photos, and stories about Subscribe online at Missouri’s coolest critters, niftiest natural mdc.mo.gov/xplor. places, and liveliest outdoor activities. The magazine is free to Missouri residents (one subscription per household, please). Out-of-state subscribers pay $5 per year; out-of-country subscribers pay $8. MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION MISSOURI CONSERVATIONIST DECEMBER 2020 Contents VOLUME 81, ISSUE 12 10 ON THE COVER Bald eagles fly over the Mississippi River : NOPPADOL PAOTHONG 500mm +2.0x teleconverter f/8, 1/640 sec, ISO 800 GOVERNOR Michael L. -
Rock Island Trail Opportunity Analysis Infrastructure That Strengthens Communities
Rock Island Trail Opportunity Analysis Infrastructure that Strengthens Communities Prepared by Pat Curry and Martha Bass University of Missouri Extension Contact [email protected], 573.882.9509 October 2018 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................3 Introduction and Background ....................................................................................6 Trail Oriented Outdoor Recreation Statistics ............................................................7 Community Engagement ...........................................................................................9 Community Impacts of Trails Literature Review........................................................10 Property Values ......................................................................................................12 Public Health ..........................................................................................................13 Business Development ...........................................................................................13 Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan ................................................14 Analysis of Public Comments .....................................................................................16 Profile of Trail Communities ......................................................................................25 Missouri’s Experience with the Katy Trail ..................................................................28 -
3. Community Facilities and Services
Appendix A 3. Community Facilities Background Information and Services INTRODUCTION Community facilities and services are required to support the functions of the community and any potential new development. These include such necessities as utilities, public safety, parks and recreation, and general governmental services. These services are supplied by County Government, municipalities, special districts, and utilities in order to enhance the overall quality of life. The rapid growth of St. Charles County has been paralleled by increased demand for public facilities and services. The timely provision of these is a critical part in making the county an attractive place for businesses and residents alike. This chapter reviews the service capabilities of water and sanitary sewer service providers, the service areas for various utilities, fire protection and emergency medical service (EMS) agencies, law enforcement, park and recreational opportunities, and County health services. Social service organizations operating within the county are also reviewed, including the services provided by these agencies, the populations served, and the future services to be offered. WATER SERVICE The water service area map depicts the water service areas of various municipalities, Missouri American Water Company, and Public Water Supply District No. 2 (PWSD2) of St. Charles County. The largest geographical service area is that of Public Water Supply District No. 2 covering sections of both St. Charles and Warren Counties. This district provides service in St. Charles County generally south of Interstate 70 from the area along Route K west to the Warren County line, and south and east to the Missouri River. The district provides service to the cities of Foristell, Lake Saint Louis, New Melle, and Augusta, and portions of the cities of Dardenne Prairie, O’Fallon and Weldon Spring. -
Washington State's Scenic Byways & Road Trips
waShington State’S Scenic BywayS & Road tRipS inSide: Road Maps & Scenic drives planning tips points of interest 2 taBLe of contentS waShington State’S Scenic BywayS & Road tRipS introduction 3 Washington State’s Scenic Byways & Road Trips guide has been made possible State Map overview of Scenic Byways 4 through funding from the Federal Highway Administration’s National Scenic Byways Program, Washington State Department of Transportation and aLL aMeRican RoadS Washington State Tourism. waShington State depaRtMent of coMMeRce Chinook Pass Scenic Byway 9 director, Rogers Weed International Selkirk Loop 15 waShington State touRiSM executive director, Marsha Massey nationaL Scenic BywayS Marketing Manager, Betsy Gabel product development Manager, Michelle Campbell Coulee Corridor 21 waShington State depaRtMent of tRanSpoRtation Mountains to Sound Greenway 25 Secretary of transportation, Paula Hammond director, highways and Local programs, Kathleen Davis Stevens Pass Greenway 29 Scenic Byways coordinator, Ed Spilker Strait of Juan de Fuca - Highway 112 33 Byway leaders and an interagency advisory group with representatives from the White Pass Scenic Byway 37 Washington State Department of Transportation, Washington State Department of Agriculture, Washington State Department of Fish & Wildlife, Washington State Tourism, Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission and State Scenic BywayS Audubon Washington were also instrumental in the creation of this guide. Cape Flattery Tribal Scenic Byway 40 puBLiShing SeRviceS pRovided By deStination -
Heritage Rail Trail Feasibility Study 2017
TOWN OF DEDHAM HERITAGE RAIL TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY 2017 PLANNING DEPARTMENT + ENVIRONMENTAL DEPARTMENT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We gratefully recognize the Town of Dedham’s dedicated Planning and Environmental Department’s staff, including Richard McCarthy, Town Planner and Virginia LeClair, Environmental Coordinator, each of whom helped to guide this feasibility study effort. Their commitment to the town and its open space system will yield positive benefits to all as they seek to evaluate projects like this potential rail trail. Special thanks to the many representatives of the Town of Dedham for their commitment to evaluate the feasibility of the Heritage Rail Trail. We also thank the many community members who came out for the public and private forums to express their concerns in person. The recommendations contained in the Heritage Rail Trail Feasibility Study represent our best professional judgment and expertise tempered by the unique perspectives of each of the participants to the process. Cheri Ruane, RLA Vice President Weston & Sampson June 2017 Special thanks to: Virginia LeClair, Environmental Coordinator Richard McCarthy, Town Planner Residents of Dedham Friends of the Dedham Heritage Rail Trail Dedham Taxpayers for Responsible Spending Page | 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction and Background 2. Community Outreach and Public Process 3. Base Mapping and Existing Conditions 4. Rail Corridor Segments 5. Key Considerations 6. Preliminary Trail Alignment 7. Opinion of Probable Cost 8. Phasing and Implementation 9. Conclusion Page | 2 Introduction and Background Weston & Sampson was selected through a proposal process by the Town of Dedham to complete a Feasibility Study for a proposed Heritage Rail Trail in Dedham, Massachusetts. -
America's Rails-With-Trails
America’s Rails-with-Trails A Resource for Planners, Agencies and Advocates on Trails Along Active Railroad Corridors About Rails-to-Trails Conservancy Rails-to-Trails Conservancy (RTC) has helped develop more than 21,000 miles of rail-trail throughout the country and provide technical assistance for thousands of miles of potential rail-trails waiting to be built. Serving as the national voice for more than 100,000 members and supporters, RTC has supported the tremendous growth and development of rail-trails since opening our doors on February 1, 1986, and remains dedicated to the creation of a nationwide network of trails and connecting corridors. RTC is committed to enhancing the health of America’s environment, transportation, economy, neighborhoods and people — ensuring a better future made possible by trails and the connections they inspire. Orange Heritage Trail, N.Y. (Boyd Loving) Acknowledgements The team wishes to recognize and thank RTC staff who contributed to the accuracy and utility of this report: Barbara Richey, graphic designer, Jake Lynch, editor, and Tim September 2013 Rosner, GIS specialist. Report produced by Rails-to-Trails The team is also grateful for the support of other RTC staff and interns who assisted Conservancy with research and report production: LEAD AUTHORS: Priscilla Bocskor, Jim Brown, Jesse Cohn, Erin Finucane, Eileen Miller, Sophia Kuo Kelly Pack, Director of Trail Development Tiong, Juliana Villabona, and Mike Vos Pat Tomes, Program Manager, RTC extends its gratitude to the trail managers and experts who shared their Northeast Regional Office knowledge to strengthen this report. A complete list of interview and survey participants is included in the Appendix, which is available online at www.