Heritage Rail Trail Feasibility Study 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Heritage Rail Trail Feasibility Study 2017 TOWN OF DEDHAM HERITAGE RAIL TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY 2017 PLANNING DEPARTMENT + ENVIRONMENTAL DEPARTMENT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We gratefully recognize the Town of Dedham’s dedicated Planning and Environmental Department’s staff, including Richard McCarthy, Town Planner and Virginia LeClair, Environmental Coordinator, each of whom helped to guide this feasibility study effort. Their commitment to the town and its open space system will yield positive benefits to all as they seek to evaluate projects like this potential rail trail. Special thanks to the many representatives of the Town of Dedham for their commitment to evaluate the feasibility of the Heritage Rail Trail. We also thank the many community members who came out for the public and private forums to express their concerns in person. The recommendations contained in the Heritage Rail Trail Feasibility Study represent our best professional judgment and expertise tempered by the unique perspectives of each of the participants to the process. Cheri Ruane, RLA Vice President Weston & Sampson June 2017 Special thanks to: Virginia LeClair, Environmental Coordinator Richard McCarthy, Town Planner Residents of Dedham Friends of the Dedham Heritage Rail Trail Dedham Taxpayers for Responsible Spending Page | 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction and Background 2. Community Outreach and Public Process 3. Base Mapping and Existing Conditions 4. Rail Corridor Segments 5. Key Considerations 6. Preliminary Trail Alignment 7. Opinion of Probable Cost 8. Phasing and Implementation 9. Conclusion Page | 2 Introduction and Background Weston & Sampson was selected through a proposal process by the Town of Dedham to complete a Feasibility Study for a proposed Heritage Rail Trail in Dedham, Massachusetts. A previous report from 2014, Dedham Greenway Concept Plan, by Rails to Trails Conservancy outlined general information about rail to trail projects and offered initial considerations of strategies to overcome existing barriers to a cohesive and continuous trail as well as opinions of probable cost. While this information was a good start, the community requested a more in-depth look at what it would take to address site-specific concerns along this particular corridor and include current estimates of probable cost based on recently publicly bid projects in Massachusetts. Weston & Sampson has reviewed the initial study and included some relevant information and findings from that document to provide context and a cohesive summary of what will be required to construct the 1.33-mile rail trail currently being considered. It must be stated that most things are technically feasible given unlimited time and money. The question is not one of ability to make this trail a reality, it is instead a determination of the value of the result in light of the resources required to get there. The following study outlines those resources and as well as the engineering considerations required to build a Heritage Rail Trail in Dedham. From the 2014 Dedham Greenway Concept Plan: Purpose and Needs Statement The proposed Dedham Greenway from the Boston City Line to Dedham Square in Massachusetts would create a 1.33-mile public green space along a former railroad corridor. This concept plan investigates the opportunities and constraints affecting the proposed greenway and sets out design concepts that can be utilized by the community for the next phase of implementation. Greenways are one of the few practical strategies that have emerged as an antidote to the problems of loss of open space, uncontrolled growth and fragmented communities; there are multiple ways that trails and greenways can help build more livable communities. Greenways and trails are designed to produce real, tangible benefits that can be summarized by four major outcomes: ▪ Resource conservation: Greenways preserve precious open space, which is crucial to the long-term livability and sustainability of a neighborhood or region. ▪ Health and recreation: Greenways promote public health by creating safe opportunities for individuals and families to engage in physical activities, such as walking and bicycling. ▪ Community revitalization: In both urban neighborhoods and rural communities, greenways encourage economic and community revitalization by stimulating small business creation and improving community quality of life. ▪ Alternative transportation: While originally created for recreation, thousands of bicycle commuters now use greenways and trails to get to work, thereby reducing traffic congestion and air pollution while building physical activity into their daily lives. In addition to these tangible outcomes, greenways also produce important intangible benefits. When the opportunity to build a new greenway arises, something remarkable often happens in a community. Page | 3 Individuals, state and local government, the private sector and community-based groups unite in the common purpose of building a greenway. Greenway building is community building. Project Goals The goals of this study are to define design alternatives for the greenway and to propose additional steps required to proceed to the design and construction stage of the project. Community Outreach and Public Process This project required a robust engagement process with the public. We led a series of meetings with the general public as well as organized groups both in favor and against the implementation of this rail trail. Given that a potential rail trail will run immediately adjacent to the Avery Elementary School and the Dedham High School Field we also made a presentation to the Dedham School Committee. On July 15, 2016 Weston & Sampson presented the feasibility study findings available at that time. The presentation covered potential alignments of the trail corridor as it interfaces with the school. The school committee voiced concerns about student safety. They also noted that the concept of a “bypass route” during school hours may still impact student safety because of the vehicular and pedestrian congestion that has been noted within the larger neighborhood. For the school committee to better understand the implications of the rail trail they requested the town complete a circulation study of this area. The Planning Department has begun to gather that data with an analysis forthcoming. A site walk was held along the entire corridor so that site specific concerns and observations could be made and documented. 800 post cards were sent via registered mail to both direct and indirect abutters asking what they would like to see on the trail. Overall, we have had contact and feedback from hundreds of abutters and Dedham residents, all of which has informed the findings of this study. The following table lists the formal meetings: DATE MEETING 03.19.16 Kick-off Meeting 04.29.16 Site Walk w/ MAPC 05.17.16 First Public Meeting 06.06.16 Dedham Abutter Meeting: Dedham Taxpayers for Responsible Spending 06.09.16 Dedham Abutters Meeting 06.15.16 Dedham School Committee 07.19.16 Dedham Abutters Meeting: Dedham Taxpayers for Responsible Spending 10.04.16 Rail Trail Site Walk w/ Abutters Through the course of this study it has become clear that this potential rail trail has both strong supporters and strong objectors. A series of letters to the editor in the Dedham Transcript have articulated both perspectives. The residents of Dedham, in particular the direct and indirect abutters, are passionate about this topic. Two organized groups have emerged around the potential rail trail project; Friends of the Heritage Rail Trail and Dedham Tax Payers for Responsible Spending. It is worth noting that The Friends of the Heritage Rail Trail raised funds to allow for additional meetings with consultants and outreach to abutters. A mailing survey was sent to all direct abutters and all abutters within 300’ of the rail corridor. The results of this mailing are as follows: Page | 4 Total # of Responses: 150 out of 433 (35%) Direct Abutters: YES = 14, NO = 37 out of 144 (YES = 10% vs NO = 26%, DID NOT RESPOND = 64% 300’ Abutters: Total: Base Mapping and Existing Site Conditions We have developed base mapping from aerial imaging and Town of Dedham Assessors Maps. Those graphics have been included as a base plan in Appendix A. The summary of existing conditions findings can be found in Appendix B. In general, the existing rail bed is in relatively good condition in that it is mostly stable with minimal signs of erosion. In areas where the surfaces are compacted, currently used informally by pedestrians, or paved through previous efforts the path is fairly passable and largely accessible for able-bodied pedestrians. There are several lengths of former rail bed that are impassible in their current condition. They include steep slopes up to Mount Vernon Street (where there was previously an underpass) and zones of volunteer vegetative growth that is incredibly dense and hard to navigate. At River Street, a bridge that spanned the roadway was removed due to large trucks being unable to make safe passage below leaving the bridge abutments but little else. There are a few locations where existing slopes exceed universally accessible limits of 5% for a sloped walkway and 8.33% for a ramp with handrails. These areas can be regraded while being mindful of the surrounding vegetation that is to be protected. Some of the existing trees need pruning or removal simply because they have reached the end of their useful life. Removals will be kept to a minimum to maintain existing screening between the rail bed and abutters.
Recommended publications
  • The Laurel Highlands Pennsylvania
    The LaureL highLands pennsylvania 2010 Travel Guide a place of WONDER You really should be here! Make New Family Memories Seven Springs Mountain Resort is the perfect place to reconnect and make a new memory with your family and friends! Whether the snow is blanketing the ground, the leaves are gilded in rich autumn hues or the sun is shining and there is a warm summer breeze, Seven Springs is your escape destination. At Pennsylvania’s largest resort, you can unwind at Trillium Spa, take a shot at sporting clays, explore 285 acres of skiable terrain, enjoy the adrenaline rush of a snowmobile tour – the opportunities are endless! At Seven Springs, we strive to provide you and yours with legendary customer service, value and warm lifelong memories. What are you waiting for? You really should be here! Seasonal packages available year-round - call 800.452.2223 or visit us on line at www.7Springs.com. Seven Springs Mountain Resort 777 Waterwheel Drive | Seven Springs, PA 15622 800.452.2223 | www.7Springs.com s you look through the 2010 Laurel AHighlands Travel Guide, you may notice the question, have you ever wondered, used a lot! Have you ever wondered what it would be like to 1won-der: \wən-dər\ n 1 a: a cause of astonishment or admiration: marvel b: miracle 2 : the quality of exciting amazed admiration 3 a : rapt attention or astonishment at something awesomely mysterious or new to one’s experience 2won-der: v won·dered; won·der·ing 1 a : to be in a state of wonder b : to feel surprise 2 : to feelhave curiosity oryou doubt 3 won-derever: adj WONDERED? wondrous, wonderful: as a : exciting amazement or admiration b : effective or efficient far beyond anything previously known or anticipated.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Statutes 2020, Chapter 85
    1​ MINNESOTA STATUTES 2020​ 85.011​ CHAPTER 85​ DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION​ STATE PARKS, RECREATION AREAS, AND WAYSIDES​ 85.06​ SCHOOLHOUSES IN CERTAIN STATE PARKS.​ 85.011​ CONFIRMATION OF CREATION AND​ 85.20​ VIOLATIONS OF RULES; LITTERING; PENALTIES.​ ESTABLISHMENT OF STATE PARKS, STATE​ 85.205​ RECEPTACLES FOR RECYCLING.​ RECREATION AREAS, AND WAYSIDES.​ 85.21​ STATE OPERATION OF PARK, MONUMENT,​ 85.0115​ NOTICE OF ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS.​ RECREATION AREA AND WAYSIDE FACILITIES;​ 85.012​ STATE PARKS.​ LICENSE NOT REQUIRED.​ 85.013​ STATE RECREATION AREAS AND WAYSIDES.​ 85.22​ STATE PARKS WORKING CAPITAL ACCOUNT.​ 85.014​ PRIOR LAWS NOT ALTERED; REVISOR'S DUTIES.​ 85.23​ COOPERATIVE LEASES OF AGRICULTURAL​ 85.0145​ ACQUIRING LAND FOR FACILITIES.​ LANDS.​ 85.0146​ CUYUNA COUNTRY STATE RECREATION AREA;​ 85.32​ STATE WATER TRAILS.​ CITIZENS ADVISORY COUNCIL.​ 85.33​ ST. CROIX WILD RIVER AREA; LIMITATIONS ON​ STATE TRAILS​ POWER BOATING.​ 85.015​ STATE TRAILS.​ 85.34​ FORT SNELLING LEASE.​ 85.0155​ LAKE SUPERIOR WATER TRAIL.​ TRAIL PASSES​ 85.0156​ MISSISSIPPI WHITEWATER TRAIL.​ 85.40​ DEFINITIONS.​ 85.016​ BICYCLE TRAIL PROGRAM.​ 85.41​ CROSS-COUNTRY-SKI PASSES.​ 85.017​ TRAIL REGISTRY.​ 85.42​ USER FEE; VALIDITY.​ 85.018​ TRAIL USE; VEHICLES REGULATED, RESTRICTED.​ 85.43​ DISPOSITION OF RECEIPTS; PURPOSE.​ ADMINISTRATION​ 85.44​ CROSS-COUNTRY-SKI TRAIL GRANT-IN-AID​ 85.019​ LOCAL RECREATION GRANTS.​ PROGRAM.​ 85.021​ ACQUIRING LAND; MINNESOTA VALLEY TRAIL.​ 85.45​ PENALTIES.​ 85.04​ ENFORCEMENT DIVISION EMPLOYEES.​ 85.46​ HORSE
    [Show full text]
  • Warner Spur Multi-Use Trail Master Plan
    Warner Spur Multi-Use Trail Master Plan Chester County Tredyffrin Township Prepared by: December 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Prepared for the In partnership with Tredyffrin Township Chester County Board of Commissioners Plan Advisory Committee Michelle Kichline Zachary Barner, East Whiteland Township Kathi Cozzone Mahew Baumann, Tredyffrin Township Terence Farrell Les Bear, Indian Run Road Association Stephen Burgo, Tredyffrin Township Carol Clarke, Great Valley Association Consultants Rev. Abigail Crozier Nestlehu, St. Peter's Church McMahon Associates, Inc. Jim Garrison, Vanguard In association with Jeff Goggins, Trammel Crow Advanced GeoServices, Corp. Rachael Griffith, Chester County Planning Commission Glackin Thomas Panzak, Inc. Amanda Lafty, Tredyffrin Township Transportation Management Association of Tim Lander, Open Land Conservancy of Chester County Chester County (TMACC) William Martin, Tredyffrin Township Katherine McGovern, Indian Run Road Association Funding Aravind Pouru, Atwater HOA Dave Stauffer, Chester County Department of Facilities and Parks Grant funding provided from the William Penn Brian Styche, Chester County Planning Commission Foundation through the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission’s Regional Trails Program. Warner Spur Multi-Use Trail Master Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 | Background 3 | Conceptual Improvement Plan Introduction 1-1 Conceptual Improvement Plan 3-1 History and Previous Plans 1-1 Conceptual Design Exhibits for Key 3-8 Connections and Crossings Study Area 1-2 Public and Emergency
    [Show full text]
  • Friday Afternoon Golf Bike the Harlem Valley
    July 2018 The Volume LXXXII, Number 7 EDGE Newsletter of The Return of a Classic - Friday Afternoon Golf Until a few years ago, HVSC had an active group of golfers who played every Friday afternoon during the summer. Each week we played a different golf course starting at 3 pm, then adjourned to a local watering hole. Unfortunately, participation waned and we stopped scheduling the events. Let’s see if we can revive the tradition with a few small changes. A one-time monthly event to gauge interest level. If popular, more will be scheduled. • Friday July 20, 2018 at College Hill Golf Course, 149 N. Clinton St, Poughkeepsie. • Tee time 2:00 p.m. for 18 holes, 4:00 p.m. for 9 holes. Call the organizer, John Macek at 845-489-6056, or email him at [email protected], so tee-time reservations can be made. We hope to see you there. Bike the Harlem Valley Rail Trail Sunday, July 22 11AM Our meeting place is the Rail Trail parking lot on Mechanic Rd in Amenia. Be there early so we can get started at 11AM. Pat Cummins will lead our group 8 miles north to the Village of Millerton. The Rail Trail is paved and has only gentle grades as we pedal through a picturesque valley to Millerton. Once there we’ll have lunch, take in the Inside... town for a bit and then bike back down Club News ............. 2-3 to Mechanic Rd. Western Trips ......... 7-8 Call Pat @ 845-519-7585 for more info, Club Events ..........
    [Show full text]
  • December 13, 2013 the Honorable
    December 13, 2013 The Honorable Andrew M. Cuomo Governor of New York State NYS State Capitol Building Albany, NY 12224 Re: Dedicated Funding for Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure Dear Governor Cuomo: The adoption of the Complete Streets law in 2011 has developed significant momentum for pedestrian and bicycle projects at the local level in our state. Communities across New York are eager to invest in pedestrian and bicycle projects, knowing that these projects improve their community’s quality of life, promote a healthier population, revitalize downtowns, increase real estate values and business activity, provide more equitable and affordable transportation choices, and reduce air pollution. Unfortunately, recent reductions in funding, on a state and federal level, greatly reduce the ability of communities to realize their goals. Since passage of the state’s Complete Streets law, the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) has substantially reduced funding for pedestrian and bicycling infrastructure. Through the Statewide Transportation Improvements Program (STIP), NYSDOT plans to spend 40% less on pedestrian and bicycling-only projects across the state over the next four years – equating to a $100 million reduction over the planning period. Road and bridge projects that include a small portion of pedestrian and bicycling infrastructure will be reduced by 60% under the STIP (excluding major bridge projects like the Tappan Zee Bridge). 1 In part, lower funding for this infrastructure is the result of a 30% reduction ($12 million annually) in funding for pedestrian and bicycling projects in the most recently adopted federal transportation law, MAP-21. While the state cannot control the level of funding coming from the federal government, these reductions also stem from NYSDOT’s new Preservation First policy, which categorically excludes new pedestrian and bicycling projects from 80% of the transportation dollars spent in this state.
    [Show full text]
  • WWRP Funding Scenerios
    Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program 2015-2017 Critical Habitat Projects Grants Awarded at Different Legislative Funding Levels Number Grant Applicant Rank and Type Project Name Grant Applicant Request Match Total $40 Million $50 Million $60 Million $70 Million $80 Million $90 Million $95 Million $97 Million 1 14-1085A Mountain View Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 2 14-1096A Simcoe Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 3 14-1087A Mid Columbia-Grand Coulee Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $1,730,000 $2,166,500 $3,476,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 4 14-1090A Heart of the Cascades Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $785,500 $2,095,000 $3,404,500 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 5 14-1091A Cowiche Watershed Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $2,200,000 $2,200,000 $59,250 $321,150 6 14-1089A Tunk Valley Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $2,000,000 $2,000,000 7 14-1099A Kettle River Corridor Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $1,000,000 $1,000,000 8 14-1609C Sage Grouse Habitat Acquisition in Deep Creek Foster Creek Conservation District $302,000 $303,152 $605,152 $20,502,000 $303,152 $20,805,152 $8,730,000 $9,166,500 $10,476,000 $11,785,500 $13,095,000 $14,404,500 $15,059,250 $15,321,150 Type Abbreviations:
    [Show full text]
  • Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste D Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type D Award Allocatio Funding Types
    Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste d Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type d Award Allocatio Funding Types Alverthorpe Manor BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township Cultural Park (6422) 11-3 11 Development $223,000 $136,900 Key - Community Abington Township TAP Trail- Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township (1101296) 22-171 22 Trails $90,000 $90,000 Key - Community Ardsley Wildlife Sanctuary- BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township Development 22-37 22 Development $40,000 $40,000 Key - Community Briar Bush Nature Center Master Site Plan BRC-TAG- Region 1 Abington Township (1007785) 20-12 20 Planning $42,000 $37,000 Key - Community Pool Feasibility Studies BRC-TAG- Region 1 Abington Township (1100063) 21-127 21 Planning $15,000 $15,000 Key - Community Rubicam Avenue Park KEY-PRD-1- Region 1 Abington Township (1) 1 01 Development $25,750 $25,700 Key - Community Demonstration Trail - KEY-PRD-4- Region 1 Abington Township Phase I (1659) 4 04 Development $114,330 $114,000 Key - Community KEY-SC-3- Region 1 Aldan Borough Borough Park (5) 6 03 Development $20,000 $2,000 Key - Community Ambler Pocket Park- Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Ambler Borough (1102237) 23-176 23 Development $102,340 $102,000 Key - Community Comp. Rec. & Park Plan BRC-TAG- Region 1 Ambler Borough (4438) 8-16 08 Planning $10,400 $10,000 Key - Community American Littoral Upper & Middle Soc/Delaware Neshaminy Watershed BRC-RCP- Region 1 Riverkeeper Network Plan (3337) 6-9 06 Planning $62,500 $62,500 Key - Rivers Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste d Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type d Award Allocatio Funding Types Valley View Park - Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Aston Township (1100582) 21-114 21 Development $184,000 $164,000 Key - Community Comp.
    [Show full text]
  • WASHINGTON STATE PARKS and RECREATION COMMISSION 1111 Israel Rd S.W
    Don Hoch Director STATE OF WASHINGTON WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 1111 Israel Rd S.W. • P.O. Box 42650 • Olympia, WA 98504-2650 • (360) 902-8500 TDD (Telecommunications Device for the Deaf): (360) 664-3133 www.parks.wa.gov STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Date of Issuance: January 14, 2019 Project Name: Klickitat Trail Development Proponent: Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission Lead Agency: Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission Description of proposal: This Klickitat Trail Development project continues previous trail planning and improvement work completed by the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) and Washington State Parks. This is the first phase of a phased environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) that expands on the previous 2003 Environmental Assessment prepared by the USFS, and adopted by Washington State Parks in 2005 as the document used for the original Determination of Non-significance (DNS) to satisfy SEPA requirements. This phased review specifically addresses updated site information identified since the original review, and new information for project modifications or new projects not previously reviewed. Phase 1 of this project proposes to construct a trailhead at Pitt and resurface approximately 12 miles of trail through Swale Canyon. Work also includes minor structural repairs, new decking and railings on seven existing trestles, replacement of one trestle with a free span bridge, and removal of one existing damaged trestle in Swale Canyon. Additionally, a preliminary concept for a potential trailhead at Warwick will be completed. Location of Proposal: Project activities will occur along portions of the Klickitat State Park Trail right-of-way corridor in Klickitat County.
    [Show full text]
  • Hiking Calendar
    President’s Message Moving Forward ow quickly man-made “structures,” David S. Marsh and Construction, and Director of Trail on which we have conditioned Maintenance. The existing position of Vice H ourselves to rely, can change. Like President of Trail Protection will assume trees in a forest after a microburst, we have responsibility for landowner relations, and watched as financial institutions and major the FLTC office will expand its corporations, flawed from mismanagement, responsibilities for data base management snapped and tumbled. A warming climate and other trail data tasks. I believe this new threatens the natural world we hold dear and organization structure will provide a more the very existence of future generations of effective Board focus on the critical task of living creatures. We are shaken to our very keeping the FLT fully operational and in roots, but out of the rubble, new growth excellent condition. We seriously need your begins to appear, and we dare to hope again. help in staffing these new positions and some These are difficult times indeed. All FLTC of the tasks that support them. You may read members and volunteers will be affected. A more about this on page 14. Please step very serious lesson has once again been forward and volunteer. The FLTC must Move learned, that greed is short sighted, our Forward! Photo by Jacqui Wensich strength is in following our fundamental The good news is that more and more people principals, and this earth, while resilient and forgiving, must be are discovering and enjoying the FLT. The bad news is that respected and protected.
    [Show full text]
  • Friends of the Genesee Valley Greenway Annual Meeting & Trail
    Fall 2018 Friends of the Genesee Valley Greenway Annual Meeting & Trail Event Sunday, November 18 in Avon Come to hike or bike or attend the program and stay for dinner. All are welcome! Sunday, Nov. 18 - FOGVG Events: Hike, Bike, At 4 pm, popular local historian Tom Cook will Program, Dinner & Annual Meeting in Avon: present: Experience hiking or biking the Erie-Attica Trail and Greenway. At 2 pm meet at the Erie-Attica Trail Parking Rambles Through History – Exploring the past Area, west of the village on Farmer’s Road, north of Rt. along the GVG in the Town of Portage. 20 and immediately east of the Genesee River. Hikers Hiking along the Greenway not only takes you and cyclists will travel the Erie-Attica Trail for about a through nature, it is also a journey through time. mile and then go north or south on the Greenway Tom’s program will explore the before returning to the fascinating history of the lands parking area by 3:30 pm. along the Genesee Valley The program, dish-to- Greenway in the town of Portage pass dinner, and from the days of the Seneca FOGVG meeting take Indians to the early 20th century. place at the United Included will be stories of early Presbyterian Church, pioneers, canal and railroad days, 133 Genesee Street in local disasters, noted Avon. Refrigeration and residents, a Civil War ovens are available. training camp, the Portage Parking in back of the Falls, and more. church is accessible on South Avenue from Main Street or several houses south down Genesee Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Connections Spring 2008
    Spring Focus of Proposed 2009-2012 TIP 2008 is Bridge Repair/Replacement The proposed 2009-2012 most of the listed projects are Park-n-Ride: 4 projects - Transportation Improvement geared toward system preser- Butler Twp., intersection of Program (TIP) has been de- vation, maintenance, and im- I-80 and PA 309; veloped by the Lackawanna/ provement. These projects in- Luzerne MPO. clude intersection improve- White Haven Borough - loca- ments, existing signal improve- tion undetermined; The TIP comprises the first ments, and road resurfacings. four years of the 12-year pro- Nuangola Borough - SR gram and the Long Range Some of the other projects on 2042 at Exit 159 of I-81; Transportation Plan. It is a the proposed TIP include the listing of projects and line following: Sugarloaf Twp. - Tomhicken items for which funding has Road, near Exit 145 of I-81 Widening: 2 projects - been designated. The proposed TIP is slated to !-81 between the Central Line items are designated be adopted by the MPO at Scranton Expressway and funding sources that can be the July meetings, pending Davis Street Interchanges; used for a particular category the results of the public com- ment period. It will then be project, such as rail, highway Airport Beltway, Hazle Town- reviewed and adopted at the reserve, transportation en- ship hancement, etc., when state and federal levels after needed. New Roadway: 2 projects - which it will become effec- South Valley Parkway which tive as of October 1st. In addition to the line item will provide better access to The public version of the categories, there are specific the Luzerne County Commu- 2009 TIP can be accessed at project listings.
    [Show full text]
  • Featured Hiking and Biking Trails
    Lake Awosting, Minnewaska State Park State Minnewaska Awosting, Lake View from Balsam Mountain Balsam from View Bluestone Wild Forest Forest Wild Wild Bluestone Bluestone Hudson Hudson the the Over Over Walkway Walkway Trails Biking Biking Hiking and Mohonk Mountain House House Mountain Mohonk Featured Reservoir Ashokan Hudson River Towns & Cities 6 Falling Waters Preserve (Town of Saugerties) 12 Mohonk Preserve Approximately two miles of varied trails exist on this 149-acre preserve. The trails (Towns of Rochester, Rosendale, Marbletown) 1 Walkway Over the Hudson & Hudson Valley are an excellent place to explore the rugged beauty of the Hudson River, while Located just north of Minnewaska Park, Mohonk Preserve is New York State’s Rail Trail hiking atop rock ledges that slant precipitously into the water. The 0.65-mile largest visitor- and member-supported nature preserve with 165,000 annual (Hamlet of Highland, Town of Lloyd) white-blazed Riverside Trail hugs the river and offers great views. The 0.9-mile visitors and 8,000 protected acres of cliffs, forests, fields, ponds and streams. The Walkway Over the Hudson (Walkway), the longest-elevated pedestrian walkway red-blazed Upland Trail affords views of the Catskills and a picturesque waterfall. Named one of the five best city escapes nationwide by Outside magazine, Mohonk in the world, spans the Hudson River between Poughkeepsie and Highland and links www.scenichudson.org/parks/fallingwaters Preserve maintains over 70 miles of carriage roads and 40 miles of trails for together an 18-mile rail trail network on both sides of the Hudson. Connected to the Saugerties Lighthouse Trail (Village of Saugerties) hiking, cycling, trail running, cross-country skiing, snowshoeing, and horseback 7 riding along the Shawangunk Mountains.
    [Show full text]