DOCSLIB.ORG

The Modular Force

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Modular Force FMI 3-0.1 THE MODULAR FORCE January 2008 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Headquarters, Department of the Army This publication is available at Army Knowledge Online (www.us.army.mil) and General Dennis J. Reimer Training and Doctrine Digital Library at (www.train.army.mil). FMI 3-0.1 Field Manual-Interim Headquarters No. 3-0.1 Department of the Army Washington, DC, 28 January 2008 The Modular Force Contents Page PREFACE ..............................................................................................................v INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................vii Chapter 1 THE ARMY AND JOINT FORCES .................................................................... 1-1 Joint Interdependence........................................................................................ 1-1 Changed Concepts for Joint and Army Operations ........................................... 1-1 Army Contributions to the Joint Force................................................................ 1-1 Transforming to a Modular Army........................................................................ 1-2 Other Brigades and Units ................................................................................. 1-20 Modular Army Forces Controlled by Other Services........................................ 1-21 Chapter 2 MODULAR FORCE ORGANIZATION .............................................................. 2-1 Organizing the Force.......................................................................................... 2-1 Understanding the Force Pool............................................................................ 2-2 Command Relationships .................................................................................... 2-4 Organizing the Modular Force............................................................................ 2-4 Chapter 3 THEATER ARMY ORGANIZATION.................................................................. 3-1 Role of the Theater Army ................................................................................... 3-1 The Theater Army Headquarters........................................................................ 3-3 Subordinate Commands of a Theater Army....................................................... 3-8 Command Post Security................................................................................... 3-31 The OCP as a Joint Force Land Component Headquarters............................ 3-32 The OCP as a Joint Task Force Headquarters................................................ 3-33 Chapter 4 CORPS HEADQUARTERS ORGANIZATION .................................................. 4-1 Primary Roles of a Corps Headquarters ............................................................ 4-1 Modular Corps Headquarters............................................................................. 4-4 Corps Command Posts ...................................................................................... 4-5 United States Air Force Elements .................................................................... 4-18 United States Marine Corps Integration ........................................................... 4-18 Multinational Integration ................................................................................... 4-18 Corps Headquarters Battalion.......................................................................... 4-19 Distribution Restriction: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 28 January 2008 i Contents Corps Headquarters as a JTF Headquarters ...................................................4-19 Corps Headquarters as a JFLC Headquarters .................................................4-20 Chapter 5 DIVISION HEADQUARTERS ORGANIZATION................................................5-1 The Modular Division ..........................................................................................5-1 Division Command Posts....................................................................................5-2 Division Headquarters Battalion .......................................................................5-20 Division Headquarters as a JTF Headquarters ................................................5-23 Division Headquarters as a JFLC Headquarters ..............................................5-23 GLOSSARY.......................................................................................... Glossary-1 REFERENCES.................................................................................. References-1 INDEX ......................................................................................................... Index-1 Figures Introductory figure 1. Theater-level modular units .................................................................. viii Introductory figure 2. Major modular units (support brigades)................................................ viii Figure 1-1. Common theater army’s subordinate units ......................................................... 1-7 Figure 1-2. The theater army provides ADCON of Army forces and supports the joint force.................................................................................................................... 1-8 Figure 1-3. The theater army’s warfighting roles ................................................................... 1-9 Figure 1-4. Corps as an intermediate tactical headquarters ............................................... 1-10 Figure 1-5. Organization of a division .................................................................................. 1-11 Figure 1-6. Task-organized division for different operations ............................................... 1-12 Figure 1-7. Heavy, infantry and Stryker brigade combat teams .......................................... 1-13 Figure 1-8. Five types of support brigades .......................................................................... 1-14 Figure 1-9. Example of additional brigades attached to a division ...................................... 1-21 Figure 1-10. A MEB under TACON to a Marine expeditionary force................................... 1-22 Figure 2-1. Organizing the force ............................................................................................ 2-2 Figure 2-2. The ARFORGEN model ...................................................................................... 2-3 Figure 2-3. Example of split ADCON relationship.................................................................. 2-6 Figure 2-4. Strategic organization of a BCT in CONUS ........................................................ 2-7 Figure 2-5. Example of force tailoring.................................................................................... 2-8 Figure 2-6. Example of task organization in a division .......................................................... 2-9 Figure 3-1. The theater army supporting a joint task force.................................................... 3-2 Figure 3-2. Theater army headquarters and main command post ........................................ 3-5 Figure 3-3. Operational command post ................................................................................. 3-6 Figure 3-4. Early entry command post................................................................................... 3-7 Figure 3-5. Operational command post headquarters battalion ............................................ 3-8 Figure 3-6. Example of theater sustainment command......................................................... 3-9 Figure 3-7. Signal command (theater) example of subordinate elements........................... 3-12 Figure 3-8. Example military intelligence brigade................................................................ 3-14 Figure 3-9. USAR civil affairs brigade operational structure................................................ 3-16 ii FMI 3-0.1 28 January 2008 Contents Figure 3-10. USAR civil affairs brigade functional specialty cell ..........................................3-17 Figure 3-11. Example medical command (deployment support) .........................................3-18 Figure 3-12. Battlefield coordination detachment organization............................................3-19 Figure 3-13. Theater AAMDC and AMD brigade .................................................................3-21 Figure 3-14. Army field support brigade...............................................................................3-22 Figure 3-15. Notional theater engineer command................................................................3-23 Figure 3-16. Notional theater aviation command .................................................................3-24 Figure 3-17. Theater aviation brigade ..................................................................................3-25 Figure 3-18. Chemical force command control relationships...............................................3-26 Figure 3-19. Example of theater army as a joint force land component ..............................3-32 Figure 3-20. Theater army as a joint task force ...................................................................3-34 Figure 4-1. Corps headquarters as an intermediate tactical headquarters............................4-2 Figure 4-2. Corps headquarters as a joint task force headquarters ......................................4-3 Figure 4-3. Corps headquarters as a joint force
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The United States Atomic Army, 1956-1960 Dissertation
    INTIMIDATING THE WORLD: THE UNITED STATES ATOMIC ARMY, 1956-1960 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Paul C. Jussel, B.A., M.M.A.S., M.S.S. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2004 Dissertation Committee Approved by Professor Allan R. Millett, Advisor Professor John R. Guilmartin __________________ Professor William R. Childs Advisor Department of History ABSTRACT The atomic bomb created a new military dynamic for the world in 1945. The bomb, if used properly, could replace the artillery fires and air-delivered bombs used to defeat the concentrated force of an enemy. The weapon provided the U.S. with an unparalleled advantage over the rest of the world, until the Soviet Union developed its own bomb by 1949 and symmetry in warfare returned. Soon, theories of warfare changed to reflect the belief that the best way to avoid the effects of the bomb was through dispersion of forces. Eventually, the American Army reorganized its divisions from the traditional three-unit organization to a new five-unit organization, dubbed pentomic by its Chief of Staff, General Maxwell D. Taylor. While atomic weapons certainly had an effect on Taylor’s reasoning to adopt the pentomic organization, the idea was not new in 1956; the Army hierarchy had been wrestling with restructuring since the end of World War II. Though the Korean War derailed the Army’s plans for the early fifties, it returned to the forefront under the Eisenhower Administration. The driving force behind reorganization in 1952 was not ii only the reoriented and reduced defense budget, but also the Army’s inroads to the atomic club, formerly the domain of only the Air Force and the Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • "OPERATIONS OP the 65Th ARTILLERY O.A.O. with the FRENCH XVII ARMY CORPS."
    ha-c GROUP R0BAROH. Group IX SubJ«ot% "OPERATIONS OP THE 65th ARTILLERY O.A.O. WITH THE FRENCH XVII ARMY CORPS." By Willla-a F, Marquat captain O.A.C.(DOL) I I Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 15 May, 1935 j MEMORANDUM FOR: The Directorf aeoond Year Glass, The Oommand and General Staff bohool, ^ort L#avenworth# dUBJBOT: Operations of the 65th Artillery, C*A.C, with tho XVII French Army Corps. 1. PAPERS ACUOMPAN11.,G: i 1. A Bibliography for this study. 2. tracing of a map showing the operations of the French XVII Corps and a diagranatio repre« sentation of the operations of the 65th ArtiL lery, in this action• I note: Other than tha tthe 65th Artillery C.A.C. i actually participated in this engagement, there is little j j Information available from official sources• borne of the j dLata presented is from personal records which necea&arily are uncorroborated* Reference is made to such personal records when used in this document. II THE STUDY PRESENTED*— Operations of the 65th Artillery, O.A.C. with the XVII Corps (French) during the period 7 to 25 October 1918. III. HISTORICAL PACTS RELATING TO THE SUBJECT. Forces t XVII French Army corps: Fro15tmh Colonialeft tol righDivisiont , drench 10th Colonial Division, French (X) A29 - PP 2 and 3 SIA - Chap V, Part 5 AAEC - pp 293-295 incl. 33EAEF - pp 5 and 6 H33D - P 5 * Pagea of this document are not numbered. Page 26 DI (Prenoh) 18 DI {Prenoh) 58th Brigade^ 29th Division ( U.S.) 33rd Division, less detachments (U.S.) Artillery: 158th Field Artillery Brigade lattaohed) 65th Artillery O.A.O., lest 3rd
    [Show full text]
  • 2Nd INFANTRY REGIMENT
    2nd INFANTRY REGIMENT 1110 pages (approximate) Boxes 1243-1244 The 2nd Infantry Regiment was a component part of the 5th Infantry Division. This Division was activated in 1939 but did not enter combat until it landed on Utah Beach, Normandy, three days after D-Day. For the remainder of the war in Europe the Division participated in numerous operations and engagements of the Normandy, Northern France, Rhineland, Ardennes-Alsace and Central Europe campaigns. The records of the 2nd Infantry Regiment consist mostly of after action reports and journals which provide detailed accounts of the operations of the Regiment from July 1944 to May 1945. The records also contain correspondence on the early history of the Regiment prior to World War II and to its training activities in the United States prior to entering combat. Of particular importance is a file on the work of the Regiment while serving on occupation duty in Iceland in 1942. CONTAINER LIST Box No. Folder Title 1243 2nd Infantry Regiment Unit Histories January 1943-June 1944 2nd Infantry Regiment Unit Histories, July-October 1944 2nd Infantry Regiment Histories, July 1944- December 1945 2nd Infantry Regiment After Action Reports, July-September 1944 2nd Infantry Regiment After Action Reports, October-December 1944 2nd Infantry Regiment After Action Reports, January-May 1945 2nd Infantry Regiment Casualty List, 1944-1945 2nd Infantry Regiment Unit Journal, 1945 2nd Infantry Regiment Narrative History, October 1944-May 1945 2nd Infantry Regiment History Correspondence, 1934-1936 2nd Infantry
    [Show full text]
  • USASF Cheer Age Grid
    2020-2021 USASF Cheer Age Grid All adjustments in RED indicate a change/addition since the previous season (2019-2020) All adjustments in BLUE indicate a change/addition since the early release in February 2020 We do not anticipate changes but reserve the right to make changes if needed. We will continue to monitor the fluidity of COVID-19 and reassess if need be to help our members. The USASF Cheer and Dance Rules, Glossary, associated Age Grids and Cheer Rules Overview (collectively the “USASF Rules Documents”) are copyright- protected and may not be disseminated to non-USASF members without prior written permission from USASF. Members may print a copy of the USASF Rules Documents for personal use while coaching a team, choreographing or engaging in event production, but may not distribute, post or give a third party permission to post on any website, or otherwise share the USASF Rules Documents. 1 Copyright © 2020 U.S. All Star Federation Released 1.11.21 -Effective 2020-2021 Season 2020-2021 Cheer Age Grid This document contains the division offerings for the 2020-2021 season in the following tiers: • All Star Elite • All Star Elite International • All Star Prep • All Star Novice • All Star FUNdamentals • All Star CheerABILITIES Exceptional Athletes (formerly Special Needs) The age grid provides a "menu" of divisions that may be offered by an individual event producer. An event producer does not have to offer every division listed. However, a USASF member event producer must only offer divisions from the age grids herein and/or combine/split divisions based upon the guidelines herein, unless prior written approval is received from the USASF.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Military and Hitler
    RESOURCES ON THE GERMAN MILITARY AND THE HOLOCAUST The German Military and Hitler Adolf Hitler addresses a rally of the Nazi paramilitary formation, the SA (Sturmabteilung), in 1933. By 1934, the SA had grown to nearly four million members, significantly outnumbering the 100,000 man professional army. US Holocaust Memorial Museum, courtesy of William O. McWorkman The military played an important role in Germany. It was closely identified with the essence of the nation and operated largely independent of civilian control or politics. With the 1919 Treaty of Versailles after World War I, the victorious powers attempted to undercut the basis for German militarism by imposing restrictions on the German armed forces, including limiting the army to 100,000 men, curtailing the navy, eliminating the air force, and abolishing the military training academies and the General Staff (the elite German military planning institution). On February 3, 1933, four days after being appointed chancellor, Adolf Hitler met with top military leaders to talk candidly about his plans to establish a dictatorship, rebuild the military, reclaim lost territories, and wage war. Although they shared many policy goals (including the cancellation of the Treaty of Versailles, the continued >> RESOURCES ON THE GERMAN MILITARY AND THE HOLOCAUST German Military Leadership and Hitler (continued) expansion of the German armed forces, and the destruction of the perceived communist threat both at home and abroad), many among the military leadership did not fully trust Hitler because of his radicalism and populism. In the following years, however, Hitler gradually established full authority over the military. For example, the 1934 purge of the Nazi Party paramilitary formation, the SA (Sturmabteilung), helped solidify the military’s position in the Third Reich and win the support of its leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aeronautical Division, US Signal Corps By
    The First Air Force: The Aeronautical Division, U.S. Signal Corps By: Hannah Chan, FAA history intern The United States first used aviation warfare during the Civil War with the Union Army Balloon Corps (see Civil War Ballooning: The First U.S. War Fought on Land, at Sea, and in the Air). The lighter-than-air balloons helped to gather intelligence and accurately aim artillery. The Army dissolved the Balloon Corps in 1863, but it established a balloon section within the U.S. Signal Corps, the Army’s communication branch, during the Spanish-American War in 1892. This section contained only one balloon, but it successfully made several flights and even went to Cuba. However, the Army dissolved the section after the war in 1898, allowing the possibility of military aeronautics advancement to fade into the background. The Wright brothers' successful 1903 flight at Kitty Hawk was a catalyst for aviation innovation. Aviation pioneers, such as the Wright Brothers and Glenn Curtiss, began to build heavier-than-air aircraft. Aviation accomplishments with the dirigible and planes, as well as communication innovations, caused U.S. Army Brigadier General James Allen, Chief Signal Officer of the Army, to create an Aeronautical Division on August 1, 1907. The A Signal Corps Balloon at the Aeronautics Division division was to “have charge of all matters Balloon Shed at Fort Myer, VA Photo: San Diego Air and Space Museum pertaining to military ballooning, air machines, and all kindred subjects.” At its creation, the division consisted of three people: Captain (Capt.) Charles deForest Chandler, head of the division, Corporal (Cpl.) Edward Ward, and First-class Private (Pfc.) Joseph E.
    [Show full text]
  • This Index Lists the Army Units for Which Records Are Available at the Eisenhower Library
    DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER LIBRARY ABILENE, KANSAS U.S. ARMY: Unit Records, 1917-1950 Linear feet: 687 Approximate number of pages: 1,300,000 The U.S. Army Unit Records collection (formerly: U.S. Army, U.S. Forces, European Theater: Selected After Action Reports, 1941-45) primarily spans the period from 1917 to 1950, with the bulk of the material covering the World War II years (1942-45). The collection is comprised of organizational and operational records and miscellaneous historical material from the files of army units that served in World War II. The collection was originally in the custody of the World War II Records Division (now the Modern Military Records Branch), National Archives and Records Service. The material was withdrawn from their holdings in 1960 and sent to the Kansas City Federal Records Center for shipment to the Eisenhower Library. The records were received by the Library from the Kansas City Records Center on June 1, 1962. Most of the collection contained formerly classified material that was bulk-declassified on June 29, 1973, under declassification project number 735035. General restrictions on the use of records in the National Archives still apply. The collection consists primarily of material from infantry, airborne, cavalry, armor, artillery, engineer, and tank destroyer units; roughly half of the collection consists of material from infantry units, division through company levels. Although the collection contains material from over 2,000 units, with each unit forming a separate series, every army unit that served in World War II is not represented. Approximately seventy-five percent of the documents are from units in the European Theater of Operations, about twenty percent from the Pacific theater, and about five percent from units that served in the western hemisphere during World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Antwerp Text
    SECOND WORLD WAR TH 60ANNIVERSARY The Advance from the Seine to Antwerp 25 August – 30 September 1944 ‘The days of rapid advance across North West Europe’ No.6 The Advance from the Seine to Antwerp ANTWERP, BELGIUM NETHERLANDS London• NORTH SEA Berlin• BELGIUM GERMANY Paris• FRANCE NETHERLANDS London KEY FACTS • Ostend • • Antwerp Antwerp is: Calais • • Brussels • The second largest city in Belgium BELGIUM Le Havre • The second largest harbour in Europe • FRANCE • Located at the inner point of the Scheldt estuary • Paris • 69 km (43 miles) from the North Sea Cover image: British infantry advance past a destroyed 88 mm anti-aircraft gun IWM B 9982 THE ADVANCE FROM THE SEINE TO ANTWERP | 1 Foreword by the Under Secretary of State for Defence and Minister for Veterans, Ivor Caplin MP This series of commemorative booklets is dedicated to those who fought for our freedom in World War Two. The booklets provide a detailed account of key actions of the war for those familiar with the period, as well as serving as an educational tool for younger people less familiar with the heroic actions of Allied Service personnel. In this, the sixth booklet in the series, we commemorate the way the Royal Navy and the RAF combined so effectively with the 21st Army Group and made such a rapid leap forward from the Seine to Antwerp. August 1944 presented the Allies with a unique opportunity to lunge like a rapier through German-held Belgium and the Netherlands and end the war in weeks rather than months. To enable such a rapid advance, the well-fortified channel ports had to be cleared of German forces and opened up to Allied ships carrying the hundreds of tons of fuel and ammunition needed to sustain the effectiveness of the rapidly advancing Armour and Infantry.
    [Show full text]
  • The U.S. Military's Force Structure: a Primer
    CHAPTER 2 Department of the Army Overview when the service launched a “modularity” initiative, the The Department of the Army includes the Army’s active Army was organized for nearly a century around divisions component; the two parts of its reserve component, the (which involved fewer but larger formations, with 12,000 Army Reserve and the Army National Guard; and all to 18,000 soldiers apiece). During that period, units in federal civilians employed by the service. By number of Army divisions could be separated into ad hoc BCTs military personnel, the Department of the Army is the (typically, three BCTs per division), but those units were biggest of the military departments. It also has the largest generally not organized to operate independently at any operation and support (O&S) budget. The Army does command level below the division. (For a description of not have the largest total budget, however, because it the Army’s command levels, see Box 2-1.) In the current receives significantly less funding to develop and acquire structure, BCTs are permanently organized for indepen- weapon systems than the other military departments do. dent operations, and division headquarters exist to pro- vide command and control for operations that involve The Army is responsible for providing the bulk of U.S. multiple BCTs. ground combat forces. To that end, the service is orga- nized primarily around brigade combat teams (BCTs)— The Army is distinct not only for the number of ground large combined-arms formations that are designed to combat forces it can provide but also for the large num- contain 4,400 to 4,700 soldiers apiece and include infan- ber of armored vehicles in its inventory and for the wide try, artillery, engineering, and other types of units.1 The array of support units it contains.
    [Show full text]
  • Main Command Post-Operational Detachments
    C O R P O R A T I O N Main Command Post- Operational Detachments (MCP-ODs) and Division Headquarters Readiness Stephen Dalzell, Christopher M. Schnaubelt, Michael E. Linick, Timothy R. Gulden, Lisa Pelled Colabella, Susan G. Straus, James Sladden, Rebecca Jensen, Matthew Olson, Amy Grace Donohue, Jaime L. Hastings, Hilary A. Reininger, Penelope Speed For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2615 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0225-7 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report documents research and analysis conducted as part of a project entitled Multi- Component Units and Division Headquarters Readiness sponsored by U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ranking Us Army Generals of the Twentieth Century
    ABSTRACT Title of thesis: RANKING U.S. ARMY GENERALS OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY USING THE GROUP ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS. Todd Philip Retchless, Master of Science 2005 Directed By: Professor Bruce Golden Department of Decision and Informatio n Technologies The group analytic hierarchy process (GAHP) is a mathematically based decision making tool that allows groups of individuals to participate in the decision making process. In this thesis, we use the GAHP and the expert opinions of 10 pro fessional and amateur military historians to rank seven U.S. Army generals of the 20th Century. We use two methods to determine the priority vectors: the traditional eigenvector method and the recently introduced interval linear programming method. We co nsider the effects of removing outlier data and compare the rankings obtained by each method. RANKING U.S. ARMY GENERALS OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY USING THE GROUP ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS. By Todd Philip Retchless Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science 2005 Advisory Committee: Professor Bruce Golden, Chair Professor Edward Wasil Pr ofessor Charles D. Levermore © Copyright by Todd Philip Retchless 2005 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................... iv List of Figures ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Strategic Postures of China and India: a Visual Guide
    MARCH 2020 The Strategic Postures of China and India: A Visual Guide Frank O’Donnell Alex Bollfrass Force Tables Reference Sheet This document contains the accompanying tables for “The Strategic Postures of China and India: A Visual Guide.” See the full report and the accompanying interactive maps at belfercenter.org/StrategicPostures The Strategic Postures of China and India: A Visual Guide | Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs | March 2020 1 Ground Forces: China Icon Name Parent Force Type Force Numbers Location Command Tibet Military 52nd Mountain Infantry Brigade HQ Infantry Brigade ~ 4,600 (total) Link District (MD) Unit 77675, 52nd Mountain Infantry Tibet MD Infantry Battalion ~ 700 Link Brigade Unit 77678, Artillery Regiment, 52nd Tibet MD Artillery Regiment ~ 1,100 Link Mountain Infantry Brigade 1st Battalion, 52nd Mountain Infantry Tibet MD Infantry Battalion ~ 700 Link Brigade 2nd Battalion, 52nd Mountain Infantry Tibet MD Infantry Battalion ~ 700 Link Brigade 3rd Battalion, 52nd Mountain Infantry Tibet MD Infantry Battalion ~ 700 Link Brigade 4th Battalion, 52nd Mountain Infantry Tibet MD Infantry Battalion ~ 700 Link Brigade 53rd Mountain Infantry Brigade HQ Tibet MD Infantry Brigade ~ 4,600 (total) Link Unit 77680, 53rd Mountain Infantry Tibet MD Infantry Battalion ~ 700 Link Brigade Artillery Regiment, Unit 77683, 53rd Tibet MD Artillery Regiment ~ 1,100 Link Mountain Infantry Brigade 1st Battalion, 53rd Mountain Infantry Tibet MD Infantry Battalion ~ 700 Link Brigade 2nd Battalion, 53rd Mountain Infantry
    [Show full text]