EXTENSIONS of REMARKS December 7, 1981 EXTENSIONS of REMARKS PERCY L

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

EXTENSIONS of REMARKS December 7, 1981 EXTENSIONS of REMARKS PERCY L 29780 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS December 7, 1981 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS PERCY L. GREAVES, JR., ON THE ments of official neutrality. On January 3, November 26, 1941, the Japanese, forced DAY OF INFAMY-PART I 1940, George Washington's wisdom was re­ by unfriendly American actions into an im­ called with: "The first President of the possible economic situation, were handed a United States warned us against entangling note making further negotiations impossi­ foreign alliances. The present President of ble. Our reading of Japanese codes had in­ HON. LARRY McDONALD the United States' subscribes to and follows formed our officials that it meant "things OF GEORGIA that precept." · are automatically going to happen," or as IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES During the unprecedented third· term our Secretary of State told our Secretary of Monday, December 7, 1981 campaign, we heard on October 23, 1940, War: "It is now in the hands of you and "The worst bombshell of fear • • • let loose <Secretary of the Navy) Knox-the Army e Mr. McDONALD. Mr. Speaker, it on this people is the accusation that this and the Navy.'' was 40 years ago today that Japan at­ Government of ours • • • without the knowl­ After the Pearl Harbor attack, Americans tacked Pearl Harbor. On December 13, edge of the Congress or of the people, has were told that it had come without any 1966, Percy Greaves had an article on secretly entered into agreements with for­ warning. The official story has been that it this subject published in National eign nations • • • I repeat again that I stand was a surprise attack that forced us into war on the Platform of our Party: 'We will not against our wishes. Review. For the benefit of my col­ participate in foreign wars and we will not leagues and interested historians I send our army, naval or air forces to fight in For years the charges that Roosevelt lied submit today, part I of the original foreign lands outside of the Americas except us into war were vehemently denied. In manuscript. Mr. Greaves' statement in case of attack.'" 1948, the great historian, Charles A. Beard, presented a preliminary case for the truth on those who will not give us the truth A week later it took the ~rm. "And while I am talking to you mothers· and fathers, I in "President Roosevelt and the Coming of of Pearl Harbor that he made in that the War, 1941-A Study of Appearances and article of 1966 is still germane today: give you one more assurance, I have said this before, but I shall say it again, and Realities.'' He was immediately reviled. There is now a new order of things in the again, and again. Your boys are not going to In an article in the August issue of the At­ land. Big Brother in Washington knows be sent into any foreign wars.'' lantic, he was accused of being "the darling best. He prints the money and calls the Even after the election, peace still had a of the McCormick-Patterson axis • • • the tune. He underwrites the history books and popular appeal. During a post-Christmas most indecent of Beard's numerous innuen­ hides the facts he does not want us to know. 1940 fireside chat we heard, "There is no does in his book are those respecting the As chief of the minority staff in the demand for sending an American Expedi­ Roberts Commission. Mr. Stimson suggested joint congressional investigation of tionary Force outside our own borders. Justice Roberts to head the Pearl Harbor Pearl Harbor, Percy Greaves is in a po­ There is no intention by any member of Commission • • • Beard insinuates that Jus­ sition to let the American people know your Government to send such a force. You tice Roberts' appointment was part of a who really was to blame for Pearl can therefore, najl any talk about sending triple play to put Kimmel and Short 'out' armies to Europe as deliberate untruth.'' and conceal the iniquities of F.D.R. and Harbor. Part I follows: Note just a few of the undeniable facts. Stimson in a cloud of dust." DAY OF INFAMY August 15, 1940, American representatives These were the words of the court histori­ <By Percy L. Greaves, Jr.) started secret war plan negotiations with an, Samuel Eliot Morison. In 1942, Professor As Pearl Harbor Day-December 7, 1941- representatives of a foreign government at Morison was drafted from Harvard by Presi­ fades a quarter of a century into the para­ war. dent Roosevelt and placed on the public graphs of history, only a small part of our March 27, 1941, American representatives payroll as a Navy officer to write the official present population can recall how our coun­ signed a secret agreement that interwove "History of United States Naval Operations try was led, step by step, into World War II. our basic strategic war plans with those of in World War II" <15 vols.). Still fewer can remember, as adults, the pre­ another nation already at war. · Whereas Beard, searching for the truth, New Deal America in which government was April 10, 1941, an American destroyer was not permitted to see the papers he con­ largely limited to the protection of individ­ dropped depth charges on a foreign subma­ sidered pertinent, Morison, writing the offi­ uals in their right to enjoy the savings of rine much nearer its home base than was cial line, had no such problem. In the words their ancestors and the fruits of their own the destroyer. of the Secretary of the Navy, "All naval ac­ labor. May 26, 1941, the United States Navy se­ tivities, afloat and ashore, were directed to There is now a new order of things in the cretly promulgated to the top Navy Com­ make available to Captain Morison such land. Big Brother in Washington knows mand a Basic War Plan <WPL-46) based on records as he might desire to consult.'' best. He prints the money and calls the secret agreements previously made with for­ eign powers, referred to therein as "Associ­ Actually, the facts conform Beard's innu­ tune. He underwrites the history books and endo. Mr. Stimson bears a heavy responsi­ hides the facts he does not want us to know. ated Powers.'' The leader of the New Deal, as the new July 7, 1941, American armed forces, bility not only for the Pearl Harbor disaster, order was once known, was Franklin Delano which were not to be sent "outside our own but also for the Roberts Report which tried Roosevelt, our only four-term President borders", landed in Iceland. This was a to make Admiral Kimmel and General <1933-1945). In his own words, he "built up quick shift from preparations to land on the Short the scapegoats for responsibilities new instruments of public power." However, Azores. The U.S. Navy was soon escorting that rightly rested on those in Washington, in one of his first fireside chats to the foreign ships carrying war material across including Mr. Stimson himself. nation, May 7, 1933, he did assure us he was the Atlantic. Mr. Stimson not only suggested Justice "going to be honest at all times with the August 10, 1941, Britain's Prime Minister, Roberts, a pre-Pearl Harbor advocate of people of the country." Winston Churchill, at the Atlantic Confer­ "Aiding the Allies," as top investigator. but Later that year, F.D.R. informed us that ence off Argentia, Newfoundland, secretly he also suggested the two Army members. American foreign policy was "from now asked the President to send an ultimatum to This gave him a majority of the five-man on • • • opposed to armed intervention." Japan. Presidential Commission. In writing his sug­ On his signing of the Neutrality Act, August August 17, 1941, the President cooperated gestions to F.D.R., he added: "Marshall and 31, 1935, we heard, "It is the policy of this by presenting the Japanese Ambassador I united on all the foregoing suggestions Government to avoid being drawn into wars with a somewhat weaker version, cabling after very careful consideration by each of between other Nations." Churchill the next day: "The statement I us.'' When running for a second term, he pon­ made to him was no less vigorous than and One of Mr. Stimson's nominees was tificated, "I speak from a long experience­ was substantially similar to the statement Joseph T. McNarney, a recently promoted the effective maintenance of American neu­ we had discussed.'' Brigadier General and right hand of Chief trality depends today, as in the past, on the September 11, 1941, the President an­ of Staff George C. Marshall. Officially, the wisdom and determination of whoever at nounced orders to the Navy to shoot at war­ appointment was suggested to give the Com­ the moment occupy the offices of President ships of nations without possessions in the mission an air expert. It was also hinted and Secretary of State." Americas. that the General was not personally suspect The outbreak of a European War in 1939 November 10, 1941, the U.S. Navy started as he was out of Washington at the time of witnessed no change in his public state- convoying foreign troops on American ships. the attack. D This symbol represents the time of day during the House proceedings, e.g., D 1407 is 2:07 p.m. e This "bullet" symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by the Member on the floor. December 7, 1981 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 29781 In fact, General McNarney, as a Colonel, Not satisfied with his own travesties on Every Navy message states its date and had acted as General Marshall's junior rep­ total truth, the retired Admiral tells us: time in six digits-the first two represent resentative when signing the March 27, "The best book by far on the question of the day of the month, the second two the 1941, secret military agreements with the why we were surprised at Pearl Harbor is hour of the day, and the last two the min­ British.
Recommended publications
  • Weather Underground Rises from the Ashes: They're Baack!
    Weather Underground Rises from the Ashes: They're Baack! I attended part of a January 20, 2006, "day workshop of interventions" — aka "a day of dialogic interventions" — at Columbia University on "Radical Politics and the Ethics of Life."[1] The event aimed "to stage a series of encounters . to bring to light . the political aporias [sic] erected by the praxis of urban guerrilla groups" in Europe and the United States from the 1960s to the 80s.[2] Hosted by Columbia's Anthropology Department, workshop speakers included veterans and leaders of the Weather Underground Bernardine Dohrn and Bill Ayers, historian Jeremy Varon, poststructuralist theorist Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak and a dozen others. The panel I sat through was just awful.[3] Veterans of Weather (as well as some fans) seem to be on a drive to rehabilitate, cleanse, and perhaps revive it — not necessarily as a new organization, but rather as an ideological component of present and future movements. There have been signs of such a sanitization and romanticization for some time. A landmark in this rehabilitation is Bill Ayers, Fugitive Days: A Memoir (Beacon Press 2001; Penguin Books 2003). This is a dubious account, full of anachronisms, inaccuracies, unacknowledged borrowings from unnamed sources (such as the documentary, Atomic Cafe, 17-19), adding up to an attempt to cover over the fact that Ayers was there only for a part of the things he describes in a volume that nonetheless presents itself as a memoir. It's also faux literary and soft core ("warm and wet and welcoming"(68)), "ruby mouth"(38), "she felt warm and moist"(81)), full of archaic sexism, littered with boasts of Ayers's sexual achievements, utterly untouched by feminism.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2008 Mackinaw City!
    O P E N E N T R Y Volume 36 Newsletter of the Michigan Archival Association No. 2 http://www.maasn.org Fall 2008 Mackinaw City! Wayne State staffers know how to party at MAA’s 50th Anniversary Reception, June 12, 2008! Left to right: Elizabeth Clemens, Mary Wallace, Kristen Chinery (all from the Walter P. Reuther Library) and Suzan Altieri (Purdy/ Kresge Library). The reception at the Annual Meeting was generously sponsored by Graphic Sciences and University Products. HIGHLIGHTS 3 President’s Corner 4 Philip P. Mason AASLH Award Winner 8 Michigan Collections 12 Annual Meeting Retrospective Mackinaw City 22 Marshall: Looking Forward to 2009 26 MAA Pride - CafePress Online Store Open Entry Fall 2008 1 Table of Contents http://www.maasn.org Board Members 2 President’s Corner 3 Philip P. Mason AASLH Award Winner 4 Connections and Collaborations: Undergraduates as Interns 5 New Board Members 6 MAA Scholarship Award Winner 7 Michigan Collections 8 Archive Media Partners Advertisement 8 Annual Meeting Retrospective Mackinaw City 2008 12 Grant Program Guidelines 21 Marshall: Looking Forward to MAA 2009 22 Donate to Annual Raffle 23 Archives and Paper Conservation Information 24 Michigan Oral History Association 25 Cultural Emergency Response Team 25 MAA Election Results 25 Open Entry is a biannual publication of the MAA Pride - CafePress Online Store 26 Michigan Archival Association New Dues Structure for 2009 26 Editor, Robert Garrett Production Editor, Cynthia Read Miller Dues Renewal Form for 2009 27 All submissions should be directed to: Calendar of Events: 2008-2009 28 Robert Garrett at [email protected] Photograph Sources 28 Archives of Michigan 702 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensions of Remarks 10509
    May 9, 1979 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 10509 MENT REPORT.-The Secretary shall set forth available to the United States Geological -Page 274, line 1, strike "(b) (1)" and in in each report to the Congress under the Survey, the Bureau of Mines, or any other lieu thereof insert "(c) (2)". Mining and Minerals Policy Act of 1970 a agency or instrumentality of the United Page 333, lines 14 and 15, strike "after the summary of the pertinent information States. date of enactment of this Act". (other than proprietary or other confidential (Additional technical amendments to -Page 275, line 8, change "28" to "27" and information) relating to minerals which is Udall-Anderson substitute (H.R. 3651) .) change "33" to "34". EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS A NONFUEL MINERAL POLICY: WE Of course, the usual antagonists are lined These Americans descend from .Japa­ CAN NO LONGER WAIT up on each side of this policy debate. But, nese, Chinese, Korean, and Filipino an­ as Nevada Congressman J. D. Santini points cestors, as well as from Hawaii and t'iher out in our p . 57 feature, their arguments Pacific Islands such as Samoa, Fiji, and HON. JIM SANTINI go by one another like ships in the night with nothing happening-until the lid blows Tahiti. In southern California, where OF NEVADA off. we have the greatest concentration of IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES But, how do you get the public excited Asian and Pacific Americans anywhere Wednesday, May 9, 1979 about metal shortages? in the Nation, their valuable involvemept Even Congressman Santini's well-meant in the growth and prosperity of our local • Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • FP 24.2 Summer2004.Pdf (5.341Mb)
    The Un vers ty of W scons n System Feminist Periodicals A current listing of contents WOMEN'S STUDIES Volume 24, Number 2 Summer 2004 Published by Phyllis Holman Weisbard LIBRARIAN Women's Studies Librarian Feminist Periodicals A current listing of contents Volume 24, Number 2 (Summer 2004) Periodical literature is the culling edge ofwomen'sscholarship, feminist theory, and much ofwomen's culture. Feminist Periodicals: A Current Listing ofContents is pUblished by the Office of the University of Wisconsin System Women's Studies Librarian on a quarterly basis with the intent of increasing public awareness of feminist periodicals. It is our hope that Feminist Periodicals will serve several purposes: to keep the reader abreast of current topics in feminist literature; to increase readers' familiarity with a wide spectrum of feminist periodicals; and to provide the requisite bibliographic information should a reader wish to subscribe to ajournal or to obtain a particular article at her library or through interlibrary loan. (Users will need to be aware of the limitations of the new copyright law with regard to photocopying of copyrighted materials.) Table ofcontents pages from current issues ofmajor feministjournals are reproduced in each issue of Feminist Periodicals, preceded by a comprehensive annotated listing of all journals we have selected. As publication schedules vary enormously, not every periodical will have table of contents pages reproduced in each issue of FP. The annotated listing provides the following information on each journal: 1. Year of first pUblication. 2. Frequency of publication. 3. U.S. subscription price(s). 4. SUbscription address. 5. Current editor. 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of the Imperial Presidency and the Framework for Executive Power, 1933-1960
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Dissertations Graduate College 4-2013 Building A House of Peace: The Origins of the Imperial Presidency and the Framework for Executive Power, 1933-1960 Katherine Elizabeth Ellison Western Michigan University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations Part of the Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Ellison, Katherine Elizabeth, "Building A House of Peace: The Origins of the Imperial Presidency and the Framework for Executive Power, 1933-1960" (2013). Dissertations. 138. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/138 This Dissertation-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BUILDING A HOUSE OF PEACE: THE ORIGINS OF THE IMPERIAL PRESIDENCY AND THE FRAMEWORK FOR EXECUTIVE POWER, 1933-1960 by Katherine Elizabeth Ellison A dissertation submitted to the Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History Western Michigan University April 2013 Doctoral Committee: Edwin A. Martini, Ph.D., Chair Sally E. Hadden, Ph.D. Mark S. Hurwitz, Ph.D. Kathleen G. Donohue, Ph.D. BUILDING A HOUSE OF PEACE: THE ORIGINS OF THE IMPERIAL PRESIDENCY AND THE FRAMEWORK FOR EXECUTIVE POWER, 1933-1960 Katherine Elizabeth Ellison, Ph.D. Western Michigan University, 2013 This project offers a fundamental rethinking of the origins of the imperial presidency, taking an interdisciplinary approach as perceived through the interactions of the executive, legislative, and judiciary branches of government during the 1930s, 1940s, and 1950s.
    [Show full text]
  • Enforcing the Hidden U.S. Equal Rights Law Ann Fagan Ginger
    Golden Gate University Law Review Volume 20 Article 1 Issue 3 Women's Law Forum January 1990 Enforcing the Hidden U.S. Equal Rights Law Ann Fagan Ginger Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/ggulrev Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Law and Gender Commons Recommended Citation Ann Fagan Ginger, Enforcing the Hidden U.S. Equal Rights Law, 20 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. (1990). http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/ggulrev/vol20/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Journals at GGU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Golden Gate University Law Review by an authorized administrator of GGU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ginger: Equal Rights Law ENFORCING THE HIDDEN U.S. EQUAL RIGHTS LAW Ann Fagan Ginger* INTRODUCTION Since 1945 the law of the United States has required the United States government to take action to promote universal observance of human rights for all without distinction as to sex. 1 This equal rights for women law is part of the supreme law of the land, to be faithfully executed by the President and the Ad­ ministration, to be enforced by the federal courts and by the courts of the several states, to be implemented by Congress, and to be obeyed by industry, reported by the media, and relied on and obeyed by the people in their daily lives. 2 Busy practitioners representing women whose equal rights have been denied will save time and increase their effectiveness by making use of this hidden law.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms International 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 USA St
    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to lielp you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated vwth a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large dieet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • How Early Post Office Policy Shaped Modern First Amendment Doctrine
    Hastings Law Journal Volume 58 | Issue 4 Article 1 1-2007 The rT ansformation of Statutes into Constitutional Law: How Early Post Officeolic P y Shaped Modern First Amendment Doctrine Anuj C. Desai Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Anuj C. Desai, The Transformation of Statutes into Constitutional Law: How Early Post Officeo P licy Shaped Modern First Amendment Doctrine, 58 Hastings L.J. 671 (2007). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol58/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Articles The Transformation of Statutes into Constitutional Law: How Early Post Office Policy Shaped Modern First Amendment Doctrine ANUJ C. DESAI* INTRODUCTION One of the great urban legends on the Internet was "Bill 6o2P."' In the late 199OS it spread like wildfire, and it occasionally makes the rounds again like pleas from Nigerian officials seeking help with their Swiss bank accounts or the story of the $250 Neiman Marcus cookie recipe. The bill, supported by (no doubt soon-to-be-defeated) "Congressman Tony Schnell," would have imposed a five cent tax on each e-mail message. One would be hard put to imagine a more nefarious way for * Assistant Professor, University of Wisconsin Law School. Many people read all or large parts of this Article and provided helpful suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibition Catalogue
    Work for the People (or Forget about Fred Hampton) "If you ever think about me, & if you ain’t gonna do no revolutionary act, forget about me. I don’t want myself on your mind if you’re not gonna work for the people." — Fred Hampton Work/Play, More Power to the People ​ Introduction On August 23rd, 1968, the eve of the Democratic National Convention in Chicago, members of the Youth International Party nominated a pig for president of the United States. The ring leaders of this gesture, the Chicago Seven, were put on trial for disorderly conduct in what has since become one of the most iconic farces of criminal justice in United States history. On August 23rd, 2018, the trial was restaged at Maria’s Packaged Goods & Community Bar in Bridgeport. 50 years after her nomination, Pigasus flew again. So too would the memories, lessons, riots, murders, celebrations, & mournings of her age. A few blocks down Morgan Street, a small group of gallerists were planning their own tribute to the year nineteen hundred & sixty-eight. Local & national artists & revolutionaries occupied the Co-Prosperity Sphere via body & object from August 31st to September 30th - a month of unearthing pasts, undermining presents, & conjuring futures. This document hopes to bring these objects & happenings into one of these futures: one where they are unnecessary - redundant - dated; a future which learns from futures past & present; a prescient future; & a future which allows anniversaries to become celebrations. - Luke Cimarusti Participating Artists: Brandon Alvendia, Sofia Córdova, Jim ​ DeRogatis, Jim Duignan, Chris Duncan, Lise Haller Baggesen, Robby Herbst, the Justseeds Artists’ Cooperative, Jason Lazarus, Jesse Malmed, Nicole Marroquin, Jennifer Moon, Josh Rios + Anthony Romero + ​ Matthew Joynt, Emilio Rojas, Dan S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fortress of Liberty: the Rise and Fall of the Draft and the Remaking of American Law
    Fortress of Liberty: The Rise and Fall of the Draft and the Remaking of American Law Jeremy K. Kessler∗ Introduction: Civil Liberty in a Conscripted Age Between 1917 and 1973, the United States fought its wars with drafted soldiers. These conscript wars were also, however, civil libertarian wars. Waged against the “militaristic” or “totalitarian” enemies of civil liberty, each war embodied expanding notions of individual freedom in its execution. At the moment of their country’s rise to global dominance, American citizens accepted conscription as a fact of life. But they also embraced civil liberties law – the protections of freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly, and procedural due process – as the distinguishing feature of American society, and the ultimate justification for American military power. Fortress of Liberty tries to make sense of this puzzling synthesis of mass coercion and individual freedom that once defined American law and politics. It also argues that the collapse of that synthesis during the Cold War continues to haunt our contemporary legal order. Chapter 1: The World War I Draft Chapter One identifies the WWI draft as a civil libertarian institution – a legal and political apparatus that not only constrained but created new forms of expressive freedom. Several progressive War Department officials were also early civil libertarian innovators, and they built a system of conscientious objection that allowed for the expression of individual difference and dissent within the draft. These officials, including future Supreme Court Justices Felix Frankfurter and Harlan Fiske Stone, believed that a powerful, centralized government was essential to the creation of a civil libertarian nation – a nation shaped and strengthened by its diverse, engaged citizenry.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Goals Versus Commercial Goals: Emile De Antonio's Rush To
    Media Industries 6.2 (2019) Political Goals versus Commercial Goals: Emile de Antonio’s Rush to Judgment on the Market Nora Stone1 UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT LITTLE ROCK norastone [AT] gmail.com Abstract Emile de Antonio had reason to hope that his second documentary, Rush to Judgment (1967), would be as popular as his first, Point of Order! (1963). Made with bestselling author and political commentator Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment was one of the very first films to question the Warren Commission’s conclusion about the Kennedy assassination. However, despite its topicality, Rush to Judgment did not entice exhibitors or audiences. While de Antonio and others attributed the film’s commercial failure to politically motivated censorship and intimidation, this explanation does not account for other factors in the documentary’s release. Using trade journals and Emile de Antonio’s archive, this article finds that Rush to Judgment’s release was hobbled by an inexperienced and dysfunctional distribution company and by de Antonio and Lane’s divergent goals. Most of all, though, the instability of the independent film market in the mid-1960s sunk the release of Rush to Judgment. Keywords: Film Distribution, Documentary, Committed Documentary, Political Emile de Antonio’s first film, Point of Order!, was a surprise success at the box office in 1964. Made with Dan Talbot, owner of the recently opened arthouse New Yorker Theater and later founder of distribution company New Yorker Films, Point of Order! tells the story of the infa- mous Army–McCarthy hearings of 1954. Distributor Walter Reade-Sterling booked Point of Order! in over one hundred cinemas, as well as numerous college campuses.
    [Show full text]
  • Lllclf 3111 Table of Contents
    r— emo MOOS NMoaa NHor AH aaj,iaa QNV aaiidwoo ADVWilldnS 31VW QNV 31IHM iSNivov DNnDonais uoivx>z|ux>6jo lllclf 3111 table of contents INTRODUCTION by JBBC (Feb. 1977) CLASS AND REVOLUTIONARY POLITICS: the meaning of the Hard Times Conference by Prairie Fire Organizing Committee (Feb. 1976) IN DEFENSE OF PRAIRIE FIRE by Clayton Van Lydegraf for PFOC (July 1976) 11 W.U.O. PUBLIC SELF-CRITICISM by the Revolutionary Committee of the WUO (Oct. 1976) 18 CRITICISM OF THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE by the Revolutionary Committee (Nov. 1976) 25 TAPE FROM BERNARDINE DOHRN (Nov. 1976) 33 LETTER FROM SISTERS IN THE W.U.O. to the women of PFOC (Sept. 1976) 36 JOHN BROWN BOOK CLUB'S SELF-CRITICISM 40 OPEN LETTER TO THE REVOLUTIONARY COMMITTEE from Native American Warriors (Jan. 1977) 41 STATEMENT ON THE BOMBING OF THE IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE by the Revolutionary Committee (Feb. 1977) 43 THE SPLIT OF THE WEATHER UNDERGROUND ORGANIZATION breakthrough is available from John Brown Book Club, P.O. Box THE NEW REVOLUTIONARY JOURNAL OF 22383, Seattle, WA 98122 PRAIRIE FIRE ORGANIZING COMMITTEE Single copies $1.00, ten The first issue (February 1977) or more 600 each, free contains the recently adopted to prisoners. Provisional Political Statement of PFOC including the entire section People who subscribed to on women's oppression and libera- the John Brown reprints tion, which was written by Prairie of Osawatomie will have Fire women. their subscriptions filled with The Split and Break- $1.00 per copy, 6 issues for $5.00 through (each pro-rated as two issues of Osawatomie).
    [Show full text]