DOCSLIB.ORG

The 2021-2024 Statewide Interstate TIP – Highway and Bridge Projects with Public Narrative

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The 2021-2024 Statewide Interstate TIP – Highway and Bridge Projects with Public Narrative Date: 5/28/20 4:09PM Page 1 of 62 Interstate TIP - Highway & Bridge Projects Allegheny PennDOT Project Id: 81931 Project Administrator: PennDOT Title: I-79, Campbell's-Moon Run Improvement Type: Restoration State Route: 79 Municipality: Robinson (TWP) Air Quality Status: Exempt from Regional Conformity Analysis Estimated Construction Bid Date: 3/2/23 Air Quality Exempt Reason: S10 - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Actual Construction Bid Date: Location: Located on I-79, Campbells Run to Moon Run, just past Crafton exit in Kennedy & Robinson Townships, Allegheny County Project Description: Resurfacing, guiderail upgrades and new pavement markings on I-79 from Campbells Run to Moon Run and bridge preservation on I-79 over State Route 22, I-79 over Campbells Run Road and I-79 over State Route 60 in Kennedy and Robinson Townships, Allegheny County. Project Costs(In Thousands) Phase Fund 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 - 2028 2029 - 2032 Preliminary Engineering NHPP $2,082 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Final Design NHPP $0 $3,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Utility 581 $0 $0 $100 $0 $0 $0 Right of Way 581 $0 $0 $475 $0 $0 $0 Construction NHPP $0 $0 $5,000 $5,000 $10,539 $0 Federal: $2082 $3000 $5000 $5000 $10539 $0 State: $0 $0 $575 $0 $0 $0 Local/Other: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 - 2028 2029 - 2032 Period Totals: $2,082 $3,000 $5,575 $5,000 $10,539 $0 Total FFY 2021-2032 Cost $26,196 PennDOT Project Id: 87756 Project Administrator: PennDOT Title: Neville Island Bridge Improvement Type: Bridge Preservation Activities State Route: 79 Municipality: Neville (TWP) Air Quality Status: Exempt from Regional Conformity Analysis Estimated Construction Bid Date: 6/4/20 Air Quality Exempt Reason: S19 - Widen narw. pave. or recon brdgs (No addtl lanes) Actual Construction Bid Date: Location: I-79 NB ramp to SR 0051 in Robinson Township 200 feet north of SR 4033 in Glenfield Borough, Allegheny County Project Description: Bridge preservation (paint, structural steel crack repairs) on I-79 and SR 65 bridges (Neville Island) and associated ramps in Robinson and Neville Townships, and Glenfield Borough, Allegheny County. Project Costs(In Thousands) Phase Fund 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 - 2028 2029 - 2032 Construction NHPP $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Federal: $30000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 State: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Local/Other: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 - 2028 2029 - 2032 Period Totals: $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total FFY 2021-2032 Cost $30,000 PennDOT Project Id: 87765 Project Administrator: PennDOT Title: I-376, 376 Business to Tonidale Improvement Type: Restoration State Route: 376 Municipality: Moon (TWP) Air Quality Status: Exempt from Regional Conformity Analysis Estimated Construction Bid Date: 5/21/20 Air Quality Exempt Reason: S10 - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Actual Construction Bid Date: 5/21/20 Location: Located on I-376, from Business 376 to SR 22 in, North Fayette, Findlay, Moon and Robinson Townships, Allegheny County. Project Description: Mill and overlay on I-376, from Business 376 to SR 22 in North Fayette, Findlay, Moon and Robinson Townships, Allegheny County. Date: 5/28/20 4:09PM Page 2 of 62 Interstate TIP - Highway & Bridge Projects Project Costs(In Thousands) Phase Fund 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 - 2028 2029 - 2032 Construction NHPP $13,539 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Federal: $13539 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 State: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Local/Other: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 - 2028 2029 - 2032 Period Totals: $13,539 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total FFY 2021-2032 Cost $13,539 PennDOT Project Id: 87767 Project Administrator: PennDOT Title: I-376, Edgewood to Churchill Improvement Type: Restoration State Route: 376 Municipality: Churchill (BORO) Air Quality Status: Exempt from Regional Conformity Analysis Estimated Construction Bid Date: 2/15/24 Air Quality Exempt Reason: S10 - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Actual Construction Bid Date: Location: Located on I-376 from Edgewood to Churchill in Edgewood, Churchill and Wilkinsburg Boro's, Allegheny County Project Description: Mill and overlay and bridge work on I-376 from Edgewood to Churchill in Edgewood, Churchill and Wilkinsburg Boro's, Allegheny County. Project Costs(In Thousands) Phase Fund 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 - 2028 2029 - 2032 Preliminary Engineering NHPP $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Final Design NHPP $0 $2,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 Utility NHPP $0 $0 $100 $0 $0 $0 Right of Way NHPP $0 $0 $450 $0 $0 $0 Construction NHPP $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $25,805 $0 Federal: $2000 $2500 $550 $10000 $25805 $0 State: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Local/Other: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 - 2028 2029 - 2032 Period Totals: $2,000 $2,500 $550 $10,000 $25,805 $0 Total FFY 2021-2032 Cost $40,855 PennDOT Project Id: 87778 Project Administrator: PennDOT Title: I-376, Churchhill to Monroeville Improvement Type: Resurface State Route: 376 Municipality: Churchill (BORO) Air Quality Status: Exempt from Regional Conformity Analysis Estimated Construction Bid Date: 3/16/23 Air Quality Exempt Reason: S10 - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Actual Construction Bid Date: Location: Located on I-376 from Churchhill to Monroeville in Churchhill Boro and Monroeville Boro, Allegheny County Project Description: Mill and overlay, bridge rehabilitation and preservation on I-376 from Churchhill to Monroeville in Churchhill Boro and Monroeville Boro, Allegheny County. Date: 5/28/20 4:09PM Page 3 of 62 Interstate TIP - Highway & Bridge Projects Project Costs(In Thousands) Phase Fund 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 - 2028 2029 - 2032 Preliminary Engineering NHPP $2,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Final Design NHPP $0 $2,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 Utility NHPP $0 $0 $250 $0 $0 $0 Right of Way NHPP $0 $0 $750 $0 $0 $0 Construction NHPP $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $64,920 $0 Federal: $2500 $2500 $11000 $10000 $64920 $0 State: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Local/Other: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 - 2028 2029 - 2032 Period Totals: $2,500 $2,500 $11,000 $10,000 $64,920 $0 Total FFY 2021-2032 Cost $90,920 PennDOT Project Id: 91565 Project Administrator: PennDOT Title: I-79, Moon Run - Neville Island Improvement Type: Reconstruct State Route: 79 Municipality: Kennedy (TWP) Air Quality Status: Exempt from Regional Conformity Analysis Estimated Construction Bid Date: 3/17/22 Air Quality Exempt Reason: S10 - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Actual Construction Bid Date: Location: Located on I-79 from Moon Run to Neville Island in Robinson, Kennedy & Neville Townships and Glenfield Borough, Allegheny County Project Description: Milling and overlay on I-79 from Moon Run to Neville Island in Robinson, Kennedy & Neville Townships and Glenfield Borough, Allegheny County Project Costs(In Thousands) Phase Fund 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 - 2028 2029 - 2032 Construction NHPP $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $12,070 $0 Federal: $0 $10000 $10000 $10000 $12070 $0 State: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Local/Other: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 - 2028 2029 - 2032 Period Totals: $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $12,070 $0 Total FFY 2021-2032 Cost $42,070 PennDOT Project Id: 94812 Project Administrator: PennDOT Title: I-79, Neville Island to I-279 Improvement Type: Restoration State Route: 79 Municipality: Aleppo (TWP) Air Quality Status: Exempt from Regional Conformity Analysis Estimated Construction Bid Date: 12/10/20 Air Quality Exempt Reason: S10 - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Actual Construction Bid Date: Location: Located on I-79, from Neville Island to I-279 in Aleppo Township and Glenfield, Sewickley Hills and Franklin Park Boros, Allegheny County. Project Description: Mill and overlay, bridge rehabilitation and bridge preservation on I-79, from Neville Island to I-279 in Aleppo Township and Glenfield, Sewickley Hills and Franklin Park Boros, Allegheny County. Date: 5/28/20 4:09PM Page 4 of 62 Interstate TIP - Highway & Bridge Projects Project Costs(In Thousands) Phase Fund 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 - 2028 2029 - 2032 Final Design 581 $1,545 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Utility 581 $106 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right of Way 581 $206 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction NHPP $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $11,545 $0 $0 Federal: $10000 $10000 $10000 $11545 $0 $0 State: $1857 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Local/Other: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 - 2028 2029 - 2032 Period Totals: $11,857 $10,000 $10,000 $11,545 $0 $0 Total FFY 2021-2032 Cost $43,402 PennDOT Project Id: 97027 Project Administrator: PennDOT Title: I-376/Carnegie Interchange Improvement Type: Interchange Improvement State Route: 376 Municipality: Carnegie (BORO) Air Quality Status: Exempt from Regional Conformity Analysis Estimated Construction Bid Date: 6/15/24 Air Quality Exempt Reason: R3 - Interchange reconfiguration projects Actual Construction Bid Date: Location: Located on I-376 Carnegie Interchange including SR 50 and SR 3099 in Scott, Carnegie and Greentree Borough, Allegheny County. Project Description: Interchange improvements and structure improvement on I-376 Carnegie Interchange including SR 50 and SR 3099 in Scott, Carnegie and Greentree Borough, Allegheny County. Project Costs(In Thousands) Phase Fund 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 - 2028 2029 - 2032 Preliminary Engineering 581 $500 $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 Final Design NHPP $0 $1,000 $1,575 $0 $0 $0 Utility 581 $0 $0 $515 $0 $0 $0 Right of Way 581 $0 $0 $0 $1,061 $0 $0 Construction NHPP $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $35,300 Federal: $0 $1000 $1575 $0 $75000 $35300 State: $500 $500 $515 $1061 $0 $0 Local/Other: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 - 2028 2029 - 2032 Period Totals: $500 $1,500 $2,090 $1,061 $75,000 $35,300 Total FFY 2021-2032 Cost $115,451 PennDOT Project Id: 97029 Project Administrator: PennDOT Title: I-376/Greentree Interchange Improvement Type: Interchange Improvement State Route: 376 Municipality: Greentree (BORO) Air Quality Status: Exempt from Regional Conformity Analysis Estimated Construction Bid Date: 6/15/24 Air Quality Exempt Reason: R3 - Interchange reconfiguration projects Actual Construction Bid Date: Location: Located on I-376 (Greentree Interchange) in the City of Pittsburgh and Greentree Borough, Allegheny County.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final Point of Access Study
    Prepared for: I-95/Scudder Falls Bridge Improvement Project Technical Memorandum No. 28 FINAL POINT OF ACCESS STUDY Contract C-393A, Capital Project No. CP0301A Prepared by: Philadelphia, PA In association with: HNTB Corporation STV Inc. Gannett Fleming, Inc. A.D. Marble & Company Kise Straw & Kolodner, Inc. Riverfront Associates, Inc. November, 2012 1 2 Technical Memorandum No. 28 – Final Point of Access Study Contract C-393A, Capital Project No. CP0301A I-95/Scudder Falls Bridge Improvement Project TABLE OF CONTENTS A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, INTRODUCTION AMD REQUIREMENTS ... 1 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................ 1 Purpose of Access......................................................................... 1 Summary of Findings .................................................................... 2 II. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 7 Project Description .............................................................. 7 Study Area Description ........................................................ 7 Project Area Description .................................................... 10 Project Purpose and Need .................................................. 11 III. REQUIREMENTS FOR APPROVAL OF ACCESS ..................................... 12 B. ENGINEERING STUDY ............................................................. 17 I. CURRENT CONDITIONS ........................................................... 17 Roadway Network
    [Show full text]
  • Our Aging Interstates
    Our Aging Interstates Pennsylvania’s more than 2,700 miles of interstate highways snake into every corner of the state, carrying 1.8 million commuters a day and making the Commonwealth one of the busiest corridors for all those consumer goods people are buying from their phones this Christmas. With the fourth-largest interstate system in the country, including the 63 miles in the Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania has long been the envy of other states, but now its interstates are deteriorating faster than they can be repaired, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) Highway Delivery Division Chief Melissa J. Batula said during a report to the Lehigh Valley Transportation Study (LVTS) and Freight Advisory Committee earlier this month. That includes Interstate 78 in the Lehigh Valley, where 62 percent of the roadway surface is rated to be in fair or poor condition, while just $8 million of the $259 million requested for “priority” projects has been programmed on the state’s 12-year plan for interstates. “We have a backlog of $251 million in the Lehigh Valley. We’re severely underfunded,” Batula said. “And that’s just what we need to keep the lights on. We’ve got to start talking about this amongst ourselves.” Those discussions won’t come easy. A report by the Interstate Steering Committee states that $13.8 billion in projects have been identified as priorities, while just $7.3 billion has been slated to be spent over the next 12 years, leaving about 188 “priority” projects unfunded. The ratio is even worse in the Lehigh Valley, where the more than 22,000 trucks daily – the second-highest statewide behind only I-81 – takes a greater toll on the roadway.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 10 Bridges by State.Xlsx
    Top 10 Most Traveled U.S. Structurally Deficient Bridges by State, 2015 2015 Year Daily State State County Type of Bridge Location Status in 2014 Status in 2013 Built Crossings Rank 1 Alabama Jefferson 1970 136,580 Urban Interstate I65 over U.S.11,RR&City Streets at I65 2nd Ave. to 2nd Ave.No Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 2 Alabama Mobile 1964 87,610 Urban Interstate I-10 WB & EB over Halls Mill Creek at 2.2 mi E US 90 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 3 Alabama Jefferson 1972 77,385 Urban Interstate I-59/20 over US 31,RRs&City Streets at Bham Civic Center Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 4 Alabama Mobile 1966 73,630 Urban Interstate I-10 WB & EB over Southern Drain Canal at 3.3 mi E Jct SR 163 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 5 Alabama Baldwin 1969 53,560 Rural Interstate I-10 over D Olive Stream at 1.5 mi E Jct US 90 & I-10 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 6 Alabama Baldwin 1969 53,560 Rural Interstate I-10 over Joe S Branch at 0.2 mi E US 90 Not Deficient Not Deficient 7 Alabama Jefferson 1968 41,990 Urban Interstate I 59/20 over Arron Aronov Drive at I 59 & Arron Aronov Dr. Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 8 Alabama Mobile 1964 41,490 Rural Interstate I-10 over Warren Creek at 3.2 mi E Miss St Line Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 9 Alabama Jefferson 1936 39,620 Urban other principal arterial US 78 over Village Ck & Frisco RR at US 78 & Village Creek Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 10 Alabama Mobile 1967 37,980 Urban Interstate
    [Show full text]
  • Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide
    Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide A Complete Compendium Of RV Dump Stations Across The USA Publiished By: Covenant Publishing LLC 1201 N Orange St. Suite 7003 Wilmington, DE 19801 Copyrighted Material Copyright 2010 Covenant Publishing. All rights reserved worldwide. Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide Page 2 Contents New Mexico ............................................................... 87 New York .................................................................... 89 Introduction ................................................................. 3 North Carolina ........................................................... 91 Alabama ........................................................................ 5 North Dakota ............................................................. 93 Alaska ............................................................................ 8 Ohio ............................................................................ 95 Arizona ......................................................................... 9 Oklahoma ................................................................... 98 Arkansas ..................................................................... 13 Oregon ...................................................................... 100 California .................................................................... 15 Pennsylvania ............................................................ 104 Colorado ..................................................................... 23 Rhode Island ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation
    visionHagerstown 2035 5 | Transportation Transportation Introduction An adequate vehicular circulation system is vital for Hagerstown to remain a desirable place to live, work, and visit. Road projects that add highway capacity and new road links will be necessary to meet the Comprehensive Plan’s goals for growth management, economic development, and the downtown. This chapter addresses the City of Hagerstown’s existing transportation system and establishes priorities for improvements to roads, transit, and pedestrian and bicycle facilities over the next 20 years. Goals 1. The city’s transportation network, including roads, transit, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities, will meet the mobility needs of its residents, businesses, and visitors of all ages, abilities, and socioeconomic backgrounds. 2. Transportation projects will support the City’s growth management goals. 3. Long-distance traffic will use major highways to travel around Hagerstown rather than through the city. Issues Addressed by this Element 1. Hagerstown’s transportation network needs to be enhanced to maintain safe and efficient flow of people and goods in and around the city. 2. Hagerstown’s network of major roads is generally complete, with many missing or partially complete segments in the Medium-Range Growth Area. 3. Without upgrades, the existing road network will not be sufficient to accommodate future traffic in and around Hagerstown. 4. Hagerstown’s transportation network needs more alternatives to the automobile, including transit and bicycle facilities and pedestrian opportunities. Existing Transportation Network Known as “Hub City,” Hagerstown has long served as a transportation center, first as a waypoint on the National Road—America’s first Dual Highway (US Route 40) federally funded highway—and later as a railway node.
    [Show full text]
  • Gregor Weichbrodt on the Road 0X0a
    0x0a On the Road Gregor Weichbrodt On the Road Gregor Weichbrodt 0x0a © 2014 Gregor Weichbrodt All rights reserved. www.ggor.de CONTENTS About this book ........................ 5 Chapter 1 ............................... 7 Chapter 2 .............................. 23 Chapter 3 .............................. 41 Chapter 4 .............................. 53 ABOUT THIS BOOK Based on the novel “On the Road” by Jack Kerouac and Google Maps Direction Service. The exact and approximate spots Kerouac traveled and described are taken from the book and parsed by Google Direction Service API. The chapters match those of the original book. Gregor Weichbrodt January 2014 www.ggor.de 7 CHAPTER 1 Head northwest on W 47th St toward 7th Ave. Take the 1st left onto 7th Ave. Turn right onto W 39th St. Take the ramp onto Lincoln Tunnel. Parts of this road are closed Mon–Fri 4:00 – 7:00 pm. Entering New Jersey. Continue onto NJ-495 W. Keep right to continue on NJ-3 W, follow signs for New Jersey 3 W/Garden State Parkway/Secaucus. Take the New Jersey 3 W exit on the left toward Clifton. Merge onto NJ-3 W. Slight right onto the Garden State Pkwy N ramp. Merge onto Garden State Pkwy. Take exit 155P on the left to merge onto NJ-19 N toward I-80/ Paterson. Turn left onto Cianci St. Turn right onto Market St. Head west on Market St toward Washington St. Turn left onto Main St. Turn right onto County Rd 509 S. Take the Interstate 80 E ramp. Merge onto I-80 E. Take exit 62A-62B toward Saddle 9 Brook/Saddle River Rd/Garden State Pkwy.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Classification Update Report for the Pocatello/Chubbuck Urbanized Area
    Functional Classification Update Report For the Pocatello/Chubbuck Urbanized Area Functional Classification Update Report Introduction The Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973 required the use of functional highway classification to update and modify the Federal-aid highway systems by July 1, 1976. This legislative requirement is still effective today. Functional classification is the process by which streets and highways are grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide. The functional classification system recognizes that streets cannot be treated as independent, but rather they are intertwined and should be considered as a whole. Each street has a specific purpose or function. This function can be characterized by the level of access to surrounding properties and the length of the trip on that specific roadway. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) functional classification system for urban areas is divided into urban principal arterials, minor arterial streets, collector streets, and local streets. Principal arterials include interstates, expressways, and principal arterials. Eligibility for Federal Highway Administration funding and to provide design standards and access criteria are two important reasons to classify roadway. The region is served by Interstate 15 (north/South) and Interstate 86 (east/west). While classified within the arterial class, they are designated federally and do not change locally. Interstates will be shown in the functional classification map, but they will not be specifically addressed in this report. Functional Classification Update The Idaho Transportation Department has the primary responsibility for developing and updating a statewide highway functional classification in rural and urban areas to determine the functional usage of the existing roads and streets.
    [Show full text]
  • 90000 SF Warehouse Building with 80000 SF Available
    90,000 SF warehouse building with 80,000 SF available for lease. Existing tenant in remaining 10,000 SF. Property is located in the Valmont Industrial Park, 1.5 miles from Route I-81 & 10 miles from Route I-80. LATITUDE: 40.971340 LONGITUDE: -76.018204 90,000 SF+/- Building PIN: T7S7001025-63 7+/- Acres Public Utilities Block/Brick Exterior Flat Roof Concrete and Tile Floors 20 ft. Ceilings 480v, 600 amp Electric 6 Dock High Doors 1 Ground Level Drive-In Door 2 Tailgate Doors 40’ x 50’ Column Spacing Fluorescent Lighting Wet Sprinkler System Paved Parking for 46 Vehicles Zoned M-2 (Manufacturing) 2019 Taxes - $32,413 Al Guari, Vice President-Brokerage [email protected] Office: 570.823.1100 * Cell: 570.499.2889 1-800-894-8040 RPD Solutions www.rpdsolutions.com RPD Analyzer Detail Report with GIS Tax Map Luzerne County, PA Owner: 150 JAYCEE DRIVE ASSOCIATES LP PIN: T7S7001025-63 Owner2: Map: T7S7 Address: PO BOX 160 Township: WEST HAZLETON BOROUGH 63 ST PETERS PA 19470 Dev Desc: Prop Addr: 150 JAYCEE DR School Dist: Hazelton Area Gen Desc: 1 S COMM BLDG Land Use: Other Furniture and Fixtures-Manufacturing (2590) Deed Date: 04/10/2008 Land Asmt: $200,000 Section: Acreage: 7.0 Deed Book: 3008 Bldg Asmt: $1,350,000 Block: 001 Layout: Deed Page: 81400 Total Asmt: $1,550,000 Lot: 025 Zoning: Sale Date: 04/10/2008 School Tax: Year Built: Prop Class: Taxable Sale Price: $2,500,000 Twp Tax: Sq Ft: Structure: Type: Building Total Tax: $32,413 Stories: Style: Control #: 63-2-571-D11-7 Water: Loan Date 1: Ward Desc: 02 Sewer: Amount 1: Owner Class: Utility: Loan Type 1: Living Units: Heat Type: Rate Type 1: Condition: Heat Fuel: Int Rate 1: Road: Air Cond: Holder 1: Frontage: Depth: Total Rms: Tax Rate: Garage: Bedrooms: Tax Ratio: Attic: Full Baths: Other 1: Basement: Half Baths: Fireplaces: Kitchens: Other 2: Pool: Family Rms: Note: Image NOT a Complete Tax Map ..
    [Show full text]
  • FFY 2009 Interstate TIP Highway & Bridge
    FFY 2009 Interstate TIP Highway & Bridge Original US DOT Approval Date: 10/01/2008 Current Date: 06/30/2010 Allegheny MPMS #: 74919 Municipality: Glenfield (Boro) Title: SR 65 @ NI Ramps Route:65 Section: A38 A/Q Status: Exempt Improvement Type: Reconstruct Exempt Code: Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est. Let Date: 06/26/2009 Actual Let Date: 06/26/2009 Geographic Limits: Located on SR 65/I79 Neville Island Interchange (9 structures), Glenfield Borough, Allegheny County Narrative: Pavement reconstruction and crack sealing. Bridge preservation work to include; dam repair, deck repairs, latex overlay, minor abutment repairs, and bearing repairs. Located on SR 65/I79 Neville Island Interchange (9 structures), Glenfield Borough, Allegheny County TIP Program Years ($000) Phase Fund FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 2nd 4 Years 3rd 4 Years CONBOO $9,047 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CONIM $12,092 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CON185 $1,005 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CON581 $1,344 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $23,487 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total FY 2009-2012 Cost $23,487 MPMS #: 26926 Municipality: Title: I79 Ohio Rvr N to 279 Route:79 Section: 35M A/Q Status: Improvement Type: Restoration Est. Let Date: 12/08/2006 Actual Let Date: 12/08/2006 Geographic Limits: Located on I-79 from the Neville Bridge to the I279 north interchange in Boroughs of Glenfield, Sewickley Hills Narrative: Located on I-79 from the Neville Bridge to the I279 north interchange Glenfield, Sewickley Hills, and Franklin Park Boro; Aleppo, Neville and Ohio Twps in Allegheny County Reconstruction of concrete pavement TIP Program Years ($000) Phase Fund FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 2nd 4 Years 3rd 4 Years CONIM $2,340 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CON581 $260 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total FY 2009-2012 Cost $2,600 Page 1 of 100 FFY 2009 Interstate TIP Highway & Bridge Original US DOT Approval Date: 10/01/2008 Current Date: 06/30/2010 Allegheny MPMS #: 26924 Municipality: Title: I-79 Kirwin Heights-I279 Route:79 Section: A12 A/Q Status: Improvement Type: Restoration Est.
    [Show full text]
  • ITD Board Sets Wish List for Potential Stimulus
    ITD board sets wish list for potential stimulus The priorities include six road projects that wouldn't otherwise be done. None are in the Valley. Idaho Statesman, January 8, 2009 By: Cynthia Sewell Idaho transportation leaders want to spend $94 million on six otherwise unfunded road projects if President-elect Barack Obama and the new Congress pass a stimulus package dedicated to infrastructure. The windfall could create between 2,000 and 4,000 Idaho jobs, officials said. None of the six roads are in the Treasure Valley, but the region's section of Interstate 84 has been getting - and is expecting to keep getting - most of the borrowed federal dollars from the Connecting Idaho project. The stimulus projects officials have identified would upgrade treacherous Idaho 95 in North Idaho and jump-start road projects in Pocatello, Twin Falls and East Idaho. The Idaho Transportation Department board picked these projects during a special meeting Wednesday, and officials say they could be under construction by June. Several versions of possible stimulus bills are circulating in Washington, and details are still sketchy. ITD expects Idaho could receive about $100 million for roads. Agency staff had identified $817 million in projects that could be ready for construction within 180 days. The six board members disagreed on two points on how best to spend the $100 million: Whether to put the money toward new projects or use it to repair the state's existing roads. Whether to divide the money equally around the state or give it to the areas with the most need. Jim Coleman, who represents North Idaho, argued that the state should use one-time money to finance key projects it is unlikely to be able to afford under current revenue sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 4: County Profile
    SECTION 4: COUNTY PROFILE SECTION 4: COUNTY PROFILE Broome County profile information is presented in the plan and analyzed to develop an understanding of a study area, including the economic, structural, and population assets at risk and the particular concerns that may be present related to hazards analyzed later in this plan (e.g., low lying areas prone to flooding or a high percentage of vulnerable persons in an area). This profile provides general information for Broome County (physical setting, population and demographics, general building stock, and land use and population trends) and critical facilities located within the County. GENERAL INFORMATION Broome County is a rural community located within the south-central part or “Southern Tier” of New York State. The Southern Tier is a geographical term that refers to the counties of New York State that lie west of the Catskill Mountains, along the northern border of Pennsylvania. Broome County lies directly west of Delaware County, 137 miles southwest of Albany and approximately 177 miles northwest of New York City. Broome County occupies approximately 715 square miles and has a population of approximately 199,031 (U.S. Census, 2011). Broome County is one of the 62 counties in New York State and is comprised of one city, sixteen towns, seven villages and many hamlets. The City of Binghamton is the County seat and is located at the confluence of the Susquehanna and Chenango Rivers. The City of Binghamton is part of the “Triple Cities,” which also includes the Villages of Endicott and Johnson City. With two Interstates and a major state route intersecting in the City of Binghamton, the area is the crossroads of the Southern Tier.
    [Show full text]
  • Iowa City a Collection of Curious Communities Destination Planner Welcome Contents
    IOWA CITY A COLLECTION OF CURIOUS COMMUNITIES DESTINATION PLANNER WELCOME CONTENTS AN EASTERN IOWA WELCOME 4 WHY IOWA CITY Thank you for considering the Iowa City area for your next event! I have been very fortunate 5 TRAVEL to help lead the destination marketing efforts of our community for almost 18 years. I am as honored today as I was when first provided this opportunity and the reasons are clear. Iowa City, 6 MEETING SERVICES Coralville, North Liberty, Johnson County and the University of Iowa make up a very special place. We are a cultured and diverse community. A place where critical discourse is truly revered. 8 MEETING FACILITIES Collaboration is a way of life in this community where hard work is honored. 20 ADDITIONAL HOTELS Our team here at the Convention & Visitors Bureau along with our truly fantastic community partners will settle for nothing less than providing you and your group an exceptional experience. As Iowans, we are, by nature, an incredibly generous and inviting people and it is our goal that 38 ALTERNATE MEETING VENUES you return home in agreement. We look forward to the opportunity to serve and please don’t hesitate to reach out directly if our team can be of more assistance. 40 DINING ESTABLISHMENTS 41 AREA MAP Josh Schamberger, President 43 CONTACT INFORMATION OUR CURIOUS COMMUNITIES TESTIMONIALS Iowa City is a center for art, culture, education and recreation. It boasts a vibrant, bike- and pedestrian-friendly downtown with many bars, restaurants, boutique shops a blend of new urban and historic neighborhoods. Home of the University of Iowa, world class health care and a rich literary heritage, the city continues to be recognized on a national scale.
    [Show full text]