DOCSLIB.ORG

FCC-09-69A1.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FCC-09-69A1.Pdf Federal Communications Commission FCC 09-69 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Implementation of the Child Safe Viewing Act; ) MB Docket No. 09-26 Examination of Parental Control Technologies for ) Video or Audio Programming ) REPORT Adopted: August 27, 2009 Released: August 31, 2009 By the Commission: Chairman Genachowski and Commissioners Copps, McDowell, Clyburn and Baker issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 II. TELEVISION......................................................................................................................................... 8 A. V-Chip............................................................................................................................................ 11 1. V-chip Data............................................................................................................................... 15 2. Potential Improvements to the V-chip ...................................................................................... 24 a. TV Parental Guidelines....................................................................................................... 25 b. Rating Advertising.............................................................................................................. 32 c. White Listing – Use of Content Descriptors to Select Programming................................. 36 d. Independent and Multiple Rating Systems......................................................................... 39 e. Other Changes to the V-chip .............................................................................................. 47 f. Intellectual Property Issues Related to the V-chip.............................................................. 49 3. Educational Efforts ................................................................................................................... 53 B. MVPD Parental Controls ............................................................................................................... 56 C. Other Parental Control Devices for Television.............................................................................. 68 1. TiVo’s KidZone ........................................................................................................................ 69 2. TVGuardian .............................................................................................................................. 74 3. CC+........................................................................................................................................... 79 4. Digital Watermarking ............................................................................................................... 81 5. Other Technologies................................................................................................................... 84 III. VIDEO GAMES................................................................................................................................... 85 IV. AUDIO-ONLY PROGRAMMING ..................................................................................................... 89 V. WIRELESS DEVICES......................................................................................................................... 94 A. Wireless Industry Guidelines and Content Controls...................................................................... 97 1. Using Content Controls........................................................................................................... 101 2. Filtering Content Using Digital Watermarking....................................................................... 103 B. Non-Content-Based Blocking and Filtering Technologies.......................................................... 104 1. General Limits on Wireless Phone Use .................................................................................. 106 2. Location-Based Services and Other Technologies.................................................................. 110 C. Open Platform Issues ................................................................................................................... 112 D. Future Developments ................................................................................................................... 113 E. Educational Efforts ...................................................................................................................... 114 VI. NON-NETWORKED DEVICES ....................................................................................................... 117 Federal Communications Commission FCC 09-69 VII.INTERNET......................................................................................................................................... 124 A. Internet ......................................................................................................................................... 124 B. Introduction.................................................................................................................................. 125 C. Previous and Current Online Safety Work................................................................................... 130 D. The Availability of Video on the Internet.................................................................................... 133 E. Discussion.................................................................................................................................... 140 1. Software Solutions .................................................................................................................. 144 2. Network Service Provider Solutions....................................................................................... 153 3. Content Service Provider Solutions ....................................................................................... 154 4. Parent and Care Giver Driven Solutions................................................................................. 168 VIII. UNIVERSAL STANDARDS .......................................................................................................... 175 IX. ENCOURAGING THE DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF PARENTAL CONTROLS.................... 179 X. CRITERIA FOR PARENTAL CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES........................................................ 187 XI. NEED FOR ADDITIONAL DATA REGARDING PARENTAL CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES.............................................................................................................................. 205 XII. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................. 213 XIII. ORDERING CLAUSES .................................................................................................................. 214 APPENDIX A – Commenters Filing in MB Docket No. 09-68 APPENDIX B – Reply Comments I. INTRODUCTION 1. We submit this Report to Congress pursuant to the Child Safe Viewing Act of 2007 (“Child Safe Viewing Act” or “Act”).1 The Act directs the Commission to provide, by August 29, 2009, an assessment of the current state of the marketplace with respect to: the existence and availability of advanced blocking technologies;2 methods of encouraging the development, deployment and use of such technologies that do not affect the packaging or pricing of programming; and the existence, availability and use of parental empowerment tools and initiatives already in the market.3 2. The Act addresses the drastic changes in the media landscape that affect children. Specifically, in the last two decades, electronic media has assumed an increasingly integral role in the lives of children.4 As a result of a number of technological innovations and the growing convergence of media, children today can access the same content sources from a variety of media platforms, many of which are portable.5 This increasingly complex media environment carries both risks and opportunities 1 See Child Safe Viewing Act of 2007, Pub. L. No. 110-452, 122 Stat. 5025 (December 2, 2008). The Act requires the Commission to issue a report to Congress no later than 270 days after the date of enactment of the Act (i.e., by August 29, 2009). See id. at Section 2(c). Because this day falls on a Saturday, we are submitting this Report to Congress on the next business day, Monday, August 31, 2009. 2 Congress defined “advanced blocking technologies” as “technologies that can improve or enhance the ability of a parent to protect his or her child from any indecent or objectionable video or audio programming, as determined by such parent, that is transmitted through the use of wire, wireless, or radio communications.” Id. at Section 2(d). 3 See id. at Section 2(a). 4 For example, a recent Nielsen survey reports that children from two to 11 years of age are spending 63 percent more time online than they did five years ago. See The Nielsen Company, Growing Up, and Growing Fast: Kids 2- 11 Spending More Time Online, July 6, 2009, http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/growing-up-and- growing-fast-kids-2-11-spending-more-time-online/. 5 For example, according to a recent survey, 77 percent of teens in the U.S. have their own mobile phone. See The Nielsen Company, How Teens Use Media, June 2009, at 8, (continued….)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • H1 2019 Trends and Opportunities What’S Trending in Social TV: H1 2019
    What’s Trending In Social TV H1 2019 Trends and Opportunities What’s Trending In Social TV: H1 2019 The state of social media for TV has been strong so far in 2019. Total Fan Growth for TV pages across Facebook, Twitter and Instagram is up 29% in the first half of 2019 compared to the second half of 2018, while social engagement increased 15% during the same time period. For Facebook, that largely means TV pages continue to recover from the algorithm changes in early 2018 that significantly limited organic reach. As TV focuses on strengthening engagement with their fanbase as opposed to just growing it, Facebook response rate and video views were up in the first half of 2019, inching back to pre-algorithm change levels. It’s a similar story for Twitter, where the TV space needed to alter their strategies following a mid-2018 purge of fake and dormant users. While the volume of tweets from TV accounts was down in the first half of 2019, the “less is more” strategy has been paying off. In Q2 2019, the average number of video views for TV hit its highest peak since the beginning of 2017. Meanwhile, the success of Instagram Stories is something TV Pages are taking advantage of in 2019. The volume of Instagram Stories published by TV accounts increased by 176% comparing Q2 2019 to Q1 2018. TV has also seen substantial growth on YouTube halfway through 2019, with fan counts and video views on the platform up 45% and 28% respectively, comparing H1 2019 to H1 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Alediaccepted 47 C.F.R
    .~ . " \'\~'{ '\ In the Matter of: ~ ccttf\tl~-- Great Plains Cable Television, Inc. )S CSR- 7c2/2--Z. Petition for Waiver of ~ ALEDIACCEPTED 47 C.F.R. § 76. 1204(a)(1) ~ MAY 3 12007 To: Chief, Media Bureau ) Federal Communications CommISSion Office of the Secretary PETITION FOR WAIVER OF 47 C.F.R. § 76.1204(a)(1) I. Introduction and Summary Great Plains Cable Television, Inc. ("Great Plains") is a small cable company providing cable services to approximately 10,000 subscribers in rural Nebraska. Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 549(c), and 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3, 76.7 and 76.1207, Great Plains respectfully requests that the Commission grant a limited waiver of 47 C.F.R. § 76.1204(a)(1) for the following set-top boxes: • Motorola DCT-1000 series • Motorola DCT-2000 series • Motorola DSR-410 (collectively, "Low-Cost Set-Top Boxes").Great Plains requests that the waiVer remain effective until the earlier of (i) the commercial availability of non-integrated I set-top boxes compatible with one-way cable plant and Comcast's HITS seryice; 1 or (ii) Great Plains' upgrade of its systems to two-way cable plant. Great Plains can and will comply with 47 C.F.R. § 76.1204(a)(1) for the almost 50% of its subscribers who are currently served by two-way cable plant. No. of Copies rec'duO-,-__ UstABCDE 1 Currently, there are DQ such set-top boxes commercially available. 1 As required by the Commission's Second Report and Order, ~ GreatPlains attaches full specifications for the Low-Cost Set-Top Boxes as Exhibit 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Viewing Packages CHANNEL LINEUPS Effective October 2019 3 COMMERCIAL XTRA™ PACK
    user guide for bars and restaurants TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Video 1 Using Your Remote Control 2 Your HD On-Screen Guide 3 Channel Lineups 6 Watch TV Your Way 7 Customized Entertainment 8 Ultimate Video & Sound Experiences 9 Sports 9 Exclusive Sports Programming 10 Popular Sports Packages 11 You're an MVP 12 Understanding Your Bill 13 Auto Bill Pay 14 Troubleshooting 16 DIRECTV for BUSINESSSM Remote App Using Your Remote Control VIDEO 1 TV Input Mode Cycles through the equipment Changes the remote’s MODE connected to your TV. to control other equipment. (Far left selection indicates the DIRECTV® Receiver.) Format Displays current screen FORMAT options and HD resolutions. O n / O ff (Works only with HD Access.) Turns both DIRECTV Receiver and TV ON or OFF at the same time. Stop (Remote must be programmed for TV. DVR still records when off .) STOP playback while viewing recorded program. Power Replay Turns On/Off POWER of whichever equipment is selected. REPLAY previous six seconds. Advance Rewind ADVANCE 30 seconds. REWIND at increasing speeds— press up to four times. Press and hold to jump to previous tick mark. Fast Forward FAST FORWARD at increasing speeds—press up to four times. Play PLAY current program. Exit EXIT the menu and return Pause to previous channel viewed. PAUSE current program. Blue Button Guide Display a one-line Channel Guide Press once for On-Screen GUIDE . while viewing your program. Press TWICE for programming grouped into categories. Yellow Button Red Button Display guide options while viewing Jump back 12 hours while the On-Screen Guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Biased Hiding of Extraordinary Abilities in Girl-Powered Disney Channel Sitcoms from the 2000S
    SECRET SUPERSTARS AND OTHERWORLDLY WIZARDS: Gender Biased Hiding of Extraordinary Abilities in Girl-Powered Disney Channel Sitcoms from the 2000s By © 2017 Christina H. Hodel M.A., New York University, 2008 B.A., California State University, Long Beach, 2006 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Film and Media Studies and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Chair: Germaine Halegoua, Ph.D. Joshua Miner, Ph.D. Catherine Preston, Ph.D. Ronald Wilson, Ph.D. Alesha Doan, Ph.D. Date Defended: 18 November 2016 The dissertation committee for Christina H. Hodel certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: SECRET SUPERSTARS AND OTHERWORLDLY WIZARDS: Gender Biased Hiding of Extraordinary Abilities in Girl-Powered Disney Channel Sitcoms from the 2000s Chair: Germaine Halegoua, Ph.D. Date Approved: 25 January 2017 ii ABSTRACT Conformity messaging and subversive practices potentially harmful to healthy models of feminine identity are critical interpretations of the differential depiction of the hiding and usage of tween girl characters’ extraordinary abilities (e.g., super/magical abilities and celebrity powers) in Disney Channel television sitcoms from 2001-2011. Male counterparts in similar programs aired by the same network openly displayed their extraordinariness and were portrayed as having considerable and usually uncontested agency. These alternative depictions of differential hiding and secrecy in sitcoms are far from speculative; these ideas were synthesized from analyses of sitcom episodes, commentary in magazine articles, and web-based discussions of these series. Content analysis, industrial analysis (including interviews with industry personnel), and critical discourse analysis utilizing the multi-faceted lens of feminist theory throughout is used in this study to demonstrate a unique decade in children’s programming about super powered girls.
    [Show full text]
  • Mac 343 Radio/Tv Programming
    MAINCOURSE WORK GUIDE MAC 343 RADIO/TV PROGRAMMING COURSE TEAM Course Developer Chidinma H. Onwubere. PhD, LL.B (NOUN) Course Writers Mr. Myke Esiri Department of Mass Communication Redeemerr’s University, Ogun State [email protected] +2348143092044 Chidinma H. Onwubere , PhD, LL.B School of Arts and Social Sciences National Open University of Nigeria, Victoria Island, Lagos [email protected] +2348023014372 EDITOR Dr. Sunday Olayinka Alawode Department of Mass Communication Lagos State University (LASU) Lagos State +234-8096095589 HEAD OF UNIT Chidinma H. Onwubere. PhD, LL.B School of Arts and Social Sciences National Open University of Nigeria, Victoria Island, Lagos NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA 1 National Open University of Nigeria Headquarters 14/16 Ahmadu Bello Way Victoria Island Lagos Abuja Office National Open University of Nigeria 5, Dar Es Salaam Street, Off Aminu Kano Crescent Wuse II, Abuja Nigeria email: [email protected] URL: www.nou.edu.ng Published by National Open University of Nigeria Printed ISBN: All Rights Reserved 2 Table of Contents Contents Page MODULE 1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................. Unit 1: The nature of radio............................................................................................ Unit 2: The nature of television Unit 3: Station Format Unit 4: Programming the station MODULE 2 SCRIPTING Unit 1 Scripting Unit 2 The scriptwriter Unit 3 Radio TV Script format MODULE 3 WRITING AND PRODUCING TALKS ON RADIO/TV Unit 1 Talk Programmes Unit
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S13810
    S13810 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE September 19, 1995 the period of 1992 to 1996, the program The motion to lay on the table was block programming and a rating sys- averaged $54.8 million a year, which is agreed to tem for programming are not nec- 3.5 times what it was in the previous The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Sen- essary. period. ator from North Dakota. Mr. President, the U.S. News & World As we have noted, the program last f Report’s review of fall TV program- year appears to be in the neighborhood ming suggests otherwise. It is regret- PRIME TIME TELEVISION—THE of $120 million. CRS says $119.5 million table that the networks are dem- NEW FALL TV PROGRAM LINEUP is their estimate. That is not a final- onstrating such disregard for the wish- ized figure. Mr. CONRAD. Mr. President, I would es of American families. The UCLA Mr. President, the other point that I like to bring the attention of the Sen- Center for Communications Policy’s think is important, that the real cost ate an article entitled ‘‘Sex and Vio- Network Violence Study released ear- of this program is not what it costs the lence on TV’’ from the most recent lier today confirms some of these con- taxpayers, which is significant and issue of U.S. News & World Report— tinuing concerns regarding violent pro- growing dramatically. It is what it September 11, 1995. The article reviews gramming. The UCLA study points out costs the consumers of America, which television network programming for that while some programming shows CRS indicates may be in the neighbor- the upcoming fall TV season.
    [Show full text]
  • Ip Video: Putting Control in the Hands of the Consumers
    IP VIDEO: PUTTING CONTROL IN THE HANDS OF THE CONSUMERS Ron Whitwortht I. INTRODUCTION Imagine a world where the entire television universe is at your fingertips. A world where television programming guides are extinct, recording devices are unnecessary, and location is irrelevant. Anything and everything is available at your command. In this world, you type the name of your favorite show and a bevy of episodes immediately appears on your screen, just as it would using a search-engine on the Internet. Within seconds you can begin playing any of those programs on your television or computer or download them to a portable device to carry with you wherever you go. You can start a movie on the sub- way, continue it during your lunch break, and finish it in your living room that night. Welcome to the world of Internet Protocol Video ("IP Video"). IP Video is ready for deployment and has the potential to revolutionize the communica- tions industry. The race to deliver IP Video to the home is underway, and the technology could serve as the ultimate battleground between cable companies and traditional telecommunications providers.' With technology developing at a rapid pace, home entertainment options for the average consumer have increased exponentially since the 1990s.2 Just thirty years ago consumers praised the advent of the video cassette recorder ("VCR") as an innovative technology that would permanently transform television view- ing patterns. However, with the arrival of new technologies such as the DVD,3 I J.D. and Institute for Communications Law Studies Certificate Candidate, May 2006, the Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Parents Television Council (PTC) Protects American Children: Promoting Social Responsibilities in the Broadcasting Industry
    Copyright 2008. No quotation or citation without attribution. IR/PS CSR Case #08-08 How the Parents Television Council (PTC) Protects American Children: Promoting Social Responsibilities in the Broadcasting Industry By: Vici Lihardo GRADUATE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND PACIFIC STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Prepared for Professor Peter Gourevitch Edited by Kristen Parks Corporate Social Responsibility Fall 2008 Copyright 2008. No quotation or citation without attribution. 2 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 3 II. OFFICIAL TV PROGRAM RATING SYSTEM (TV-PG)................................................. 5 II.1. FCC and Regulating the Content of TV Programs.............................................................. 5 II.2.The Problems of TV-PG ....................................................................................................... 7 III. THE ORGANIZATION OF PTC......................................................................................... 8 III.1.The Establishment and the Mission of PTC ........................................................................ 8 III.2. Promoting a “Standard” of Family Friendly TV-Program............................................... 9 III.3. Monitoring the Industry: What the PTC has done ........................................................... 10 III.4. Expanded Issues and Market Driven Approach..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Fourth Annual Annenberg Public Policy Conference on Children and Television: a Summary
    NO. 31 THE FOURTH ANNUAL ANNENBERG PUBLIC POLICY CONFERENCE ON CHILDREN AND TELEVISION: A SUMMARY Report prepared by Kimberly Duyck Woolf 28 June 1999 REPORT SERIES THE ANNENBERG PUBLIC POLICY CENTER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA Publications Services, University of Pennsylvania 79525 / 1.00 / 7500 / RC.JM TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract . .3 Introduction . .4 The Annenberg Public Policy Center’s Press Conference . .4 Keynote Address . .10 Panel One The Changing Economics of Children’s Television . .12 Panel Two Teaching through Television: Beyond the Preschool Years . .14 Panel Three Children in the Contemporary Media Environment . .17 Luncheon Award Ceremony . .20 Copyright ©1999 Annenberg Public Policy Center All rights reserved F OREWORD The Annenberg Public Policy Center was established by publisher and philanthropist Walter Annenberg in 1994 to create a community of scholars within the University of Pennsylvania which would address public policy issues at the local, state and federal levels. Consistent with the mission of the Annenberg School for Communication, the Center has four ongoing foci: Information and Society; Media and the Developing Mind; Media and the Dialogue of Democracy; and Health Communication. The Center supports research and sponsors lectures and conferences in these areas. This series of publications dissem- inates the work of the Center. Kathleen Hall Jamieson Director Kimberly Duyck Woolf is a doctoral candidate at the Annenberg School for Communication of the University of Pennsylvania. 2 ABSTRACT The Annenberg Public Policy Center (APPC) of the University of Pennsylvania hosted its fourth annual Conference on Children and Television on June 28, 1999, at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Representation
    Children’s Television Worldwide: Gender Representation in USA Analysis and report by: Dr. Maya Götz, Dr. Ole Hofmann, Stefan Dobler MA, Sebastian Scherr BA, Dipl.-Soz. Christine Bulla, Matthias Schreiner MA Project Directors: Midwest: Prof. Norma Pecora Ohio University, Athens West: Prof. Divya C. McMillin, University of Washington, Tacoma East: Prof. JoEllen Fisherkeller, New York University, New York © International Central Institute for Youth and Educational Television (IZI) Children’s Television Worldwide: Gender Representation in US Children’s Television Children’s Television in the USA In the United States most children’s programming is distributed nationally either on the five terrestrial broadcast networks [ABC, CBS, NBC, CW, Fox], three cable or video on-demand channels [ABC Family, ION, TLC], or on nine cable channels that are dedicated to children’s programming with 24 hour programming [Cartoon Network, Discovery Kids, Disney, Nickelodeon, Nicktoons, The N, Noggin, Sprout, ToonDisney]. In addition, there are local public broadcasting stations across the USA that distributed children’s programming non-commercial programming [PBS and PBS Digital]. Sprout, an on-demand channel, offers an interesting partnership between Comcast (a commercial cable company), HIT Entertainment and Sesame Workshop (production companies), and PBS. Programming on Sprout represents much the same found on PBS stations but its distribution reflects commercial systems like Disney and Nickelodeon. For the purposes of this study PBS programming was taped from WLIW/PBS and WNET/PBS in New York City; WOUB/PBS in Athens, Ohio; KBTC/PBS in Tacoma, Washington. There are very few local or regional programs available for children and, in fact, all programming in this sample is distributed nationally.
    [Show full text]
  • NO to Continue Using Early Action
    --------------------------------.------ -------------- -- ---- -----------------------------, THE The Independent Newspaper Serving Notre Dame and Saint Mary's VOLUME 41 : ISSUE 25 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2006 N DSMCOBSERVER.COM NO to continue using early action SBPD to Princeton and Harvard eliminate early admissions programs, heighten University encourages students to apply when best prepared presence months of sleepless nights ended, his cur­ •47% (1.241] of early applicants By ROHAN ANAND rent roommate, Conor Troy, discovered were admitted News Writer his Early Action application was deferred Excise police will focus to the regular decision pool. on Washington and A few days before Christmas 2005, "I was clearly discouraged at first freshman Chris Holland arrived at his because Notre Dame was my first St. Peter's Streets Louisville home to see that his mom had choice," Troy said. "But I also realized it posted a Notre Dame flag in his front was a big application pool and I was yard. Inside was an official acceptance hopeful for the regular decision results, By KAITLYNN RIELY letter granting him admission to the so I focused on working hard senior year News Writer University's Class of 2010 via the Early and keeping my grades up." Action program. Both Holland and Troy's scenarios point A meeting of the Northeast "I was ecstatic," he said. "Not only to the ambiguity involved in the college­ Neighborhood Council of South •19% were ethnic minorities because Notre Dame was my dream admissions process - and, more specifi­ Bend (NENC) two weeks ago school, but because the whole college cally, the debate sparked by Princeton prompted Notre Dame's Off­ •22% were children of alumni admissions process was finally over." Campus Council to send an e­ Source: Office of Admissions JARRED WAFERfThe Observer Just as Holland's white-knuckled see ACTION/page 4 mail Thursday warning students that police are heightening their presence on Washington and St.
    [Show full text]
  • User Guide for Shops, Services & Private Offices
    user guide for shops, services & private offi ces TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 From the Beginning 1 Know Your HD On-Screen Guide 2 Using Your Remote Control 3 Channel Lineups 7 Enjoy Free Interactive Features 8 Find Your Shows 9 Access Helpful Tools 10 Watch TV Your Way 11 All About Sports 11 Exclusive Sports Programming 12 Popular Sports Packages The Best Tools 13 for Your Business 14 Billing Made Simple 14 Understanding Your Monthly Statement 15 Auto Bill Pay Tap into the 16 Ultimate TV 18 Troubleshooting Know Your HD On-Screen Guide FROM THE BEGINNING 1 Channels Timeline TV Window Guide Options Highlight the channel To see what’s on later, Watch your program Press DASH or YELLOW abbreviation to get the navigate forward with the while using the Guide. button to sort programming channel description. RIGHT ARROW . Use the by category, move to a LEFT ARROW to go back. specifi c date and time, change your Favorites list and see On Demand titles. Watch Crime Scene Kitchen on On Demand Highlight Bar Restart Advance Timeline next to a channel name Use the ARROW buttons next to a show means Press FFWD or GREEN indicates that On Demand to highlight a program you can restart the show button to advance content is available. Highlight and view its description. from the beginning. Select 12 hours. Press RWD the channel name and then To tune to a highlighted the show, then press RWD or RED button to go press SELECT to access. program, press SELECT . to watch from the beginning.
    [Show full text]