San Clemente Island Military Operations and Fire Management Plan 2008

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

San Clemente Island Military Operations and Fire Management Plan 2008 U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Opinion FWS- LA-09B0027-09F0040 San Clemente Island Military Operations and Fire Management Plan 2008 Los Angeles, California Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office Carlsbad, California November 2008 i TABLE OF CONTENTS CONSULTATION HISTORY..................................................................................................... 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................... 3 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE............................................................................................. 66 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS........................................................................................................ 75 SPECIES BY SPECIES EVALUATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ....................................... 76 Plants..................................................................................................................................... 76 San Clemente Island Bush mallow (Malacothamnus clementinus) ................................ 76 San Clemente Island Indian Paintbrush (Castilleja grisea) ............................................ 91 San Clemente Island larkspur (Delphinium variegatum var. kinkiense)....................... 102 San Clemente Island broom (Lotus dendroideus var. traskiae).................................... 113 San Clemente Island woodland star (Lithophragma maximum) ................................... 122 Santa Cruz Island Rock-Cress (Sibara filifolia)............................................................ 130 Birds.................................................................................................................................... 141 Brown pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis) ....................................................................... 141 San Clemente Loggerhead Shrike (Lanius ludovicianus mearnsi) ............................... 150 San Clemente Sage Sparrow (Amphispiza belli clementeae)........................................ 167 Western Snowy Plover (Charadrius alexandrinus nivosis) .......................................... 185 Reptile ................................................................................................................................. 193 Island night lizard (Xantusia riversiana)....................................................................... 193 INCIDENTAL TAKE STATEMENT .................................................................................... 206 AMOUNT OR EXTENT OF TAKE....................................................................................... 207 EFFECT OF THE TAKE ........................................................................................................ 210 REASONABLE AND PRUDENT MEASURES.................................................................... 210 TERMS AND CONDITIONS.................................................................................................. 211 CONSERVATION RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................................ 213 LITERATURE CITED ............................................................................................................ 217 FIGURES / MAPS Figure 1a-e. San Clemente Island Listed Species and Proposed Training Areas .......................... 5 Figure 2. Locations of SWATS and TARs on San Clemente Island........................................... 21 Figure 3. Modified boundary for TAR 11 ................................................................................... 25 Figure 4. Revised boundary of Tar 16 ......................................................................................... 28 Figure 5a-c. Location of BTS Sites.............................................................................................. 34 Figure 6. Location of IOA, AVMAs, AFPs, and AMPs on San Clemente Island....................... 44 Figure 7. San Clemente Island 2007-2008 Existing Fuelbreaks, and General Location for Proposed Fuelbreaks. .................................................................................................................... 57 Figure 8. Land Management Units on San Clemente Island ....................................................... 73 ii TABLES Table 1. Frequency of Current Operations and Proposed Increases in Frequency...................... 11 Table 2. TAR Ranges and BTS Sites on San Clemente Island.................................................... 31 Table 3. Proposed New Operations and New Uses in Existing Training Areas.......................... 37 Table 4. Battalion Landing Vehicles and Locations..................................................................... 43 Table 5. Fire Danger Rating and Precautions for SHOBA.......................................................... 53 Table 6. Fire Danger Rating and Precautions System for TARs outside of SHOBA.................. 54 Table 7. Ecological Units, Acreages, and Percentages of Island Area for San Clemente Island 71 Table 8. Natural Resources Management Activities and Studies for Listed Species Funded in 2008............................................................................................................................................... 74 Table 9. Linear abundance of nesting loggerhead shrikes on San Clemente Island from selected canyons (1994-2004) .................................................................................................................. 155 Table 10. San Clemente Island Loggerhead Shrike Breeding Pairs from 1994 to 2007 ........... 155 Table 11. Distribution of shrike nest sites in and within 305 m (1,000 ft) of operational areas.156 Table 12. Sage sparrow adult population estimates 1976-2008 (from Kaiser et al. 2008)........ 170 Table 13. Percentage of Estimated Population (Density–based estimate) Within Density Categories ................................................................................................................................... 173 Table 14. Sage Sparrow Habitat Within Operational Boundaries ............................................. 174 Table 15. Number of Sage Sparrows Within Operational Boundaries Based on Density Category Estimates, 1999-2006.................................................................................................................. 175 Table 16. Midpoint of Regression and Lincoln Index estimates of population density and population size of island night lizard on San Clemente Island................................................... 198 Table 17. Island night lizard habitat (acres and percent of habitat type) within project footprint ..................................................................................................................................................... 201 Table 18. Estimated number of island night lizards (number / percent of population) within the project footprint from habitat-based density estimates in Table 16 (Mautz 2001)..................... 201 Acronyms and Abbreviations Used in the San Clemente Island Military Operations and Fire Management Plan Biological Opinion A AA Assault Amphibian AAV Amphibious Assault Vehicles ac Acre or acres Act Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) AFP Artillery Firing Point AMP Artillery Maneuver Point ASW Anti-Submarine Warfare ATACMS Army Tactical Missile System AVMA Assault Vehicle Maneuver Area AVMC Assault Vehicle Maneuver Corridor iii AVMR Assault Vehicle Maneuver Road B BA Biological Assessment BAT Ballistic Aerial Target BMP Best Management Practice BOMBEX Bombing Exercise BTS Basic Training Sites BUD/S Basic Underwater Demolition/SEAL BUDS Basic Underwater Demolition School C CAS Close Air Support CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act cm centimeter or centimeters CNDDB California Natural Diversity Database CNRSW Commander, Naval Region Southwest COMPUTEX Composite Training Unit Exercise CPF Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet CQC Close quarter combat CRRC Combat Rubber Raiding Craft CSAR Combat Search and Rescue D DNA Deoxyribonucleic acid DPS Distinct Population Segment DT Developmental Testing DZ Drop Zone E EA Environmental Assessment EC Electronic Combat EFEX Expeditionary Firing Exercise EFV Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle EOD Explosive Ordnance Disposal F FCLP Fleet Carrier Landing Practice FDRS Fire Danger Rating System FIREX Firing Exercise FLETA HOT Fleet Training Area Hot FMP Fire Management Plan FOT&E Follow-on Test and Evaluation FR Federal Register FSCEX Fire Support Coordination Exercise iv ft foot or feet FTX Field training exercise G g gram or grams GPS Global Positioning Satellite H ha hectare or hectares HMMWV High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicle I IAD Immediate Action Drills in. inch or inches INLMA Island Night Lizard Management Area INRMP Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan INS Inertial Navigation System IOA Infantry Operations Area J JSOW Joint Standoff Weapon JTFEX Joint Task Force Exercise K kg kilogram or kilograms km kilometer or kilometers km/h kilometers-per-hour L LACA Landing Craft Air-Cushion LASW Land Attack Standard Missile LAW Light Anti-tank Weapon LAV Light Armored Vehicles lb pound or pounds LCU Landing Craft Utilities M m meter or meters MAROPS Maritime Operations MCBCP Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton MPPEH Munitions Potentially Possessing Explosive Hazards MCM Mine Counter-Measures METT-T Mission Enemy Terrain, Troops available and Time MEU Marine Expeditionary Unit mi. mile or miles v MIR Missile Impact Range
Recommended publications
  • Research on the Effects of Wildland Fire and Fire Management on Federally Listed Species and Their Habitats on San Clemente Island, Southern California
    Research on the Effects of Wildland Fire and Fire Management on Federally Listed Species and Their Habitats on San Clemente Island, Southern California Open-File Report 2015–1194 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Research on the Effects of Wildland Fire and Fire Management on Federally Listed Species and Their Habitats on San Clemente Island, Southern California By Jon E. Keeley and Teresa J. Brennan Open-File Report 2015–1194 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Keeley, J.E., and Brennan, T.J., 2015, Research on the effects of wildland fire and fire management on federally listed species and their habitats on San Clemente Island, southern California: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Planting Lines
    San Clemente Island Native Habitat Restoration Program Native Seed Collection, Propagation and Outplanting in Support of San Clemente Island Endangered Species Programs Under Contract With: Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest San Diego, California N68711 -05-D-3605-0077 Prepared By: Emily Howe, Korie Merrill, Thomas A. Zink. Soil Ecology and Restoration Group San Diego State University Research Foundation, San Diego, CA Prepared for: Natural Resources Office Environmental Department, Commander, Navy region Southwest, San Diego, CA Table Of Contents Table Of Contents ................................................................................................................ 2 Table of Figures ................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.0 Native Plant Nursery ..................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Nursery Inventory .......................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Seed propagation ........................................................................................................... 5 2.0 Rainfall Data Collection ................................................................................................ 6 3.0 Seed Collection .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Partial Flora Survey Rottnest Island Golf Course
    PARTIAL FLORA SURVEY ROTTNEST ISLAND GOLF COURSE Prepared by Marion Timms Commencing 1 st Fairway travelling to 2 nd – 11 th left hand side Family Botanical Name Common Name Mimosaceae Acacia rostellifera Summer scented wattle Dasypogonaceae Acanthocarpus preissii Prickle lily Apocynaceae Alyxia Buxifolia Dysentry bush Casuarinacea Casuarina obesa Swamp sheoak Cupressaceae Callitris preissii Rottnest Is. Pine Chenopodiaceae Halosarcia indica supsp. Bidens Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia blackiana Samphire Chenopodiaceae Threlkeldia diffusa Coast bonefruit Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia quinqueflora Beaded samphire Chenopodiaceae Suada australis Seablite Chenopodiaceae Atriplex isatidea Coast saltbush Poaceae Sporabolis virginicus Marine couch Myrtaceae Melaleuca lanceolata Rottnest Is. Teatree Pittosporaceae Pittosporum phylliraeoides Weeping pittosporum Poaceae Stipa flavescens Tussock grass 2nd – 11 th Fairway Family Botanical Name Common Name Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia quinqueflora Beaded samphire Chenopodiaceae Atriplex isatidea Coast saltbush Cyperaceae Gahnia trifida Coast sword sedge Pittosporaceae Pittosporum phyliraeoides Weeping pittosporum Myrtaceae Melaleuca lanceolata Rottnest Is. Teatree Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia blackiana Samphire Central drainage wetland commencing at Vietnam sign Family Botanical Name Common Name Chenopodiaceae Halosarcia halecnomoides Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia quinqueflora Beaded samphire Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia blackiana Samphire Poaceae Sporobolis virginicus Cyperaceae Gahnia Trifida Coast sword sedge
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Weeds of Coastal Plains and Heathy Forests Bioregions of Victoria Heading in Band
    Advisory list of environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria Heading in band b Advisory list of environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria Heading in band Advisory list of environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria Contents Introduction 1 Purpose of the list 1 Limitations 1 Relationship to statutory lists 1 Composition of the list and assessment of taxa 2 Categories of environmental weeds 5 Arrangement of the list 5 Column 1: Botanical Name 5 Column 2: Common Name 5 Column 3: Ranking Score 5 Column 4: Listed in the CALP Act 1994 5 Column 5: Victorian Alert Weed 5 Column 6: National Alert Weed 5 Column 7: Weed of National Significance 5 Statistics 5 Further information & feedback 6 Your involvement 6 Links 6 Weed identification texts 6 Citation 6 Acknowledgments 6 Bibliography 6 Census reference 6 Appendix 1 Environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria listed alphabetically within risk categories. 7 Appendix 2 Environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria listed by botanical name. 19 Appendix 3 Environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria listed by common name. 31 Advisory list of environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria i Published by the Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment Melbourne, March2008 © The State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment 2009 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • Species List: Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office
    United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Carlsbad Fish And Wildlife Office 2177 Salk Avenue - Suite 250 Carlsbad, CA 92008-7385 Phone: (760) 431-9440 Fax: (760) 431-5901 http://www.fws.gov/carlsbad/ In Reply Refer To: January 06, 2021 Consultation Code: 08ECAR00-2021-SLI-0125 Event Code: 08ECAR00-2021-E-01032 Project Name: Los Angeles County, CA - 2018 CDBG-DR, Owner-Occupied Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Subject: Updated list of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location or may be affected by your proposed project To Whom It May Concern: The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, and proposed species, designated critical habitat, and candidate species that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds on San Clemente Island, As Part of Our Work Toward the Recovery of the Island’S Endangered Species
    WESTERN BIRDS Volume 36, Number 3, 2005 THE BIRDS OF SAN CLEMENTE ISLAND BRIAN L. SULLIVAN, PRBO Conservation Science, 4990 Shoreline Hwy., Stinson Beach, California 94970-9701 (current address: Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, 159 Sapsucker Woods Rd., Ithaca, New York 14850) ERIC L. KERSHNER, Institute for Wildlife Studies, 2515 Camino del Rio South, Suite 334, San Diego, California 92108 With contributing authors JONATHAN J. DUNN, ROBB S. A. KALER, SUELLEN LYNN, NICOLE M. MUNKWITZ, and JONATHAN H. PLISSNER ABSTRACT: From 1992 to 2004, we observed birds on San Clemente Island, as part of our work toward the recovery of the island’s endangered species. We increased the island’s bird list to 317 species, by recording many additional vagrants and seabirds. The list includes 20 regular extant breeding species, 6 species extirpated as breeders, 5 nonnative introduced species, and 9 sporadic or newly colonizing breeding species. For decades San Clemente Island had been ravaged by overgrazing, especially by goats, which were removed completely in 1993. Since then, the island’s vegetation has begun recovering, and the island’s avifauna will likely change again as a result. We document here the status of that avifauna during this transitional period of re- growth, between the island’s being largely denuded of vegetation and a more natural state. It is still too early to evaluate the effects of the vegetation’s still partial recovery on birds, but the beginnings of recovery may have enabled the recent colonization of small numbers of Grasshopper Sparrows and Lazuli Buntings. Sponsored by the U. S. Navy, efforts to restore the island’s endangered species continue—among birds these are the Loggerhead Shrike and Sage Sparrow.
    [Show full text]
  • Wt 1-11 Radfahrzeuge Wt 2/10 Ila1 2/22/11 12:04 PM Seite 52
    wt 1-11 radfahrzeuge_wt 2/10 ila1 2/22/11 12:04 PM Seite 52 Stefan Nitschke Schutz bei Rad- und Kettenfahrzeugen – Teil I Der Schutz von militärisch genutz- ten Rad- und Kettenfahrzeugen und ihren Besatzungen hat höchste Priorität bei Einsätzen der Bun des - wehr. Schutzsysteme müssen hier- bei ständig an die Bedrohungslage angepasst werden. Nur so ist es möglich, den sich ständig ändern- den Gefährdungen durch improvi- sierte Sprengfallen (IEDs), projektil- bildende Ladungen, Minen und RPGs wirkungsvoll entgegenzuwir- ken. Diese Rundum-Bedrohung ist in der Regel räumlich begrenzt und führt dazu, dass direkte Schutz ver - fahren (ballistischer Körperschutz, Spreng brandgranaten mit Raketenzusatz - Schutzausstattungen und -konzepten der Panzerschutz, ABC-Schutz, De - antrieb aus dem Hinterhalt verschossen. Industrie. Fahrzeugsysteme wie der einge- kon tamination) sowie indirekte Die für unzureichend geschützte Fahr- führte DINGO 1 und 2, der DURO III/YAK Schutztechniken (Tarnmaßnah - zeuge sehr gefährliche Hohlladungs - sowie das seit dem Jahr 2009 der men, Täusch- und Störmaßnah - munition besteht aus einer Sprengladung, Bundeswehr zulaufende Radfahrzeug men, Reduzierung der akusti- die mit einer meist kegelförmigen metalli- EAGLE IV sind gegen IED-Explosionen schen, optischen/Infrarot- und Ra - schen Auskleidung versehen ist. Bei und deren Wirkungen wie Splitter, Blast darsignatur) weiter an Bedeutung Zündung wird ein Hohlladungs-Stachel und Druck wirksam geschützt. Im Rahmen zunehmen. Im vorliegenden ersten erzeugt, der nach vorne mit sehr hoher eines Einsatzbedingten Sofortbedarfs hat Teil befasst sich der Autor mit der Geschwindigkeit (bis über 8.000 m/sec) die Bundeswehr bereits zwischen 2003 Bedrohungslage im Einsatzland austritt und in das Ziel eindringt. und 2006 insgesamt 130 hoch geschützte und der Rolle der Industrie bei der Die Erkenntnisse aus Afghanistan bele- Mehrzweckfahrzeuge des Typs DURO III/ Entwicklung von hoch geschützten gen, dass viele der eingesetzten Fahr- YAK beschafft.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix G. Wildlife and Plant Species at the Sacramento River National Wildlife Refuge and Vicinity (Red Bluff to Colusa)
    Appendix G.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Resources and Wetlands Technical Report
    Chapter 1 Affected Environment Figure 1-3g. Sensitive Biological Resources Between Shasta Dam and Red Bluff Pumping Plant 1-45 Draft – June 2013 Shasta Lake Water Resources Investigation Biological Resources Appendix – Botanical Resources and Wetlands Technical Report This page left blank intentionally. 1-46 Draft – June 2013 Chapter 1 Affected Environment Figure 1-3h. Sensitive Biological Resources Between Shasta Dam and Red Bluff Pumping Plant 1-47 Draft – June 2013 Shasta Lake Water Resources Investigation Biological Resources Appendix – Botanical Resources and Wetlands Technical Report This page left blank intentionally. 1-48 Draft – June 2013 Chapter 1 Affected Environment Figure 1-3i. Sensitive Biological Resources Between Shasta Dam and Red Bluff Pumping Plant 1-49 Draft – June 2013 Shasta Lake Water Resources Investigation Biological Resources Appendix – Botanical Resources and Wetlands Technical Report This page left blank intentionally. 1-50 Draft – June 2013 Chapter 1 Affected Environment Figure 1-3j. Sensitive Biological Resources Between Shasta Dam and Red Bluff Pumping Plant 1-51 Draft – June 2013 Shasta Lake Water Resources Investigation Biological Resources Appendix – Botanical Resources and Wetlands Technical Report This page left blank intentionally. 1-52 Draft – June 2013 Chapter 1 Affected Environment 1 Valley Oak Woodland This habitat type consists of an open savanna of 2 valley oak (Quercus lobata) trees and an annual grassland understory. Valley 3 oak is typically the only tree species present and shrubs are generally absent 4 except for occasional poison oak. Canopy cover rarely exceeds 30–40 percent in 5 valley oak woodland. This community occupies the highest portions of the 6 floodplain terrace where flooding is infrequent and shallow.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Draft Environmental Assessment
    Environmental Assessment for the Revised INRMP Draft May 2012 1 2 3 4 5 6 Preliminary Draft Environmental Assessment 7 For Naval Base Coronado, Naval Auxiliary Landing Field 8 San Clemente Island 9 Revised Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan 10 Los Angeles County, California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 July 2012 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Abstract i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 This Page Intentionally Blank 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 Environmental Assessment for the Revised INRMP Preliminary Draft July 2012 1 Preliminary Draft Environmental Assessment 2 For the Revised Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan 3 4 Naval Base Coronado 5 Naval Auxiliary Landing Field 6 San Clemente Island 7 Los Angeles County, California 8 9 Abstract 10 This Environmental Assessment (EA) has been prepared by the U.S. Department of the Navy 11 (Navy) to determine if an Environmental Impact Statement or Finding of No Significant Impact 12 (FONSI) should be prepared for the management strategies proposed in the Final Revised 13 Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP) for Naval Auxiliary Landing Field 14 San Clemente Island (SCI), California. The purpose of the Revised INRMP is to meet statutory 15 requirements under the Sikes Act Improvement Act (Sikes Act [as amended]), Public Law 105- 16 85, Div. B Title XXIX, 18 November 1997, 111 Stat 2017-2019, 2020-2022, as well as the 17 requirements of various U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened and Endangered Species
    CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK Threatened and Endangered Species Scientific Name Common Name Federal State Anacapa Santa Cruz Santa Rosa San Miguel Santa Barbara Acipenser medirostris North American green T sturgeon Arctocephalis townsendi Guadalupe fur seal T T M Balaenoptera borealis Sei whale Rorqual E Balaenoptera physalus Finback whale E Charadrius nivosus Western snowy plover T SSC R M Enhydra lutris nereis Southern sea otter T A! C R M B! Eubalaena japonica Right Whale Extirpated; Proposed Eumetopias jubatas Steller (Northern) Sea Lion T M Haliotis sorenseni White abalone E A C R!? M!? B Haliotis cracherodii Black abalone E A C R M B Lepidochelys olivacea Olive Ridley T C? Megaptera novaengliae Humpback whale E Melospiza melodia Santa Barbara song Extinct B! graminea sparrow Physeter catodon Sperm whale E Sibaldus musculus Blue whale E Synthliboramphus scrippsii Scripps’s murrelet Candidate T A C M B Urocyon littoralis cruzae Santa Cruz Island fox E T C Urocyon littoralis Santa Rosa Island fox E T R santarosae Urocyon littoralis littoralis San Miguel Island fox E T M Xantusia riversiana Island night lizard T (Proposed B to delist) ** Plant [Arabis hoffmannii] now: Hoffmann’s rock-cress E A! C R Boechera hoffmannii Arctostaphylos confertiflora Santa Rosa Island E R manzanita Berberis pinnata ssp. Island barberry E E A! C R!? insularis Castilleja mollis Soft-leaved paintbrush E R M! 1 Scientific Name Common Name Federal State Anacapa Santa Cruz Santa Rosa San Miguel Santa Barbara Dudleya nesiotica Santa Cruz Island Live- T C Forever Dudleya traskiae Santa Barbara live-forever E (EE) E B Galium buxifolium Box-leaved bedstraw E C M Gilia tenuiflora ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Rule for 16 Plant Taxa from the Northern Channel Islands
    Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 25, 1995 / Proposed Rules 37993 Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Final promulgation of the regulations Carlsbad Field Office (see ADDRESSES Services, Endangered Species Permits, on these species will take into section). 911 N.E. 11th Avenue, Portland, Oregon consideration the comments and any Author. The primary author of this 97232±4181 (telephone 503/231±2063; additional information received by the document is Debra Kinsinger, Carlsbad Field facsimile 503/231±6243). Service, and such communications may Office (see ADDRESSES section). lead to a final regulation that differs Public Comments Solicited List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17 from this proposal. The Service intends that any final The Endangered Species Act provides Endangered and threatened species, action resulting from this proposal will for one or more public hearings on this Exports, Imports, Reporting and be as accurate and as effective as proposal, if requested. Requests must be recordkeeping requirements, and possible. Therefore, comments or received by September 25, 1995. Such Transportation. suggestions from the public, other requests must be made in writing and concerned governmental agencies, the addressed to the Field Supervisor of the Proposed Regulation Promulgation scientific community, industry, or any Carlsbad Field Office (see ADDRESSES Accordingly, the Service hereby other interested party concerning this section). proposes to amend part 17, subchapter proposed rule are hereby solicited. National Environmental Policy Act B of chapter I, title 50 of the Code of Comments particularly are sought Federal Regulations, as set forth below: concerning: The Fish and Wildlife Service has (1) Biological, commercial trade, or determined that Environmental PART 17Ð[AMENDED] other relevant data concerning any Assessments or Environmental Impact threat (or lack thereof) to Sibara filifolia, Statements, as defined under the 1.
    [Show full text]