DOCSLIB.ORG

Preliminary Draft Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Preliminary Draft Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment for the Revised INRMP Draft May 2012 1 2 3 4 5 6 Preliminary Draft Environmental Assessment 7 For Naval Base Coronado, Naval Auxiliary Landing Field 8 San Clemente Island 9 Revised Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan 10 Los Angeles County, California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 July 2012 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Abstract i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 This Page Intentionally Blank 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 Environmental Assessment for the Revised INRMP Preliminary Draft July 2012 1 Preliminary Draft Environmental Assessment 2 For the Revised Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan 3 4 Naval Base Coronado 5 Naval Auxiliary Landing Field 6 San Clemente Island 7 Los Angeles County, California 8 9 Abstract 10 This Environmental Assessment (EA) has been prepared by the U.S. Department of the Navy 11 (Navy) to determine if an Environmental Impact Statement or Finding of No Significant Impact 12 (FONSI) should be prepared for the management strategies proposed in the Final Revised 13 Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP) for Naval Auxiliary Landing Field 14 San Clemente Island (SCI), California. The purpose of the Revised INRMP is to meet statutory 15 requirements under the Sikes Act Improvement Act (Sikes Act [as amended]), Public Law 105- 16 85, Div. B Title XXIX, 18 November 1997, 111 Stat 2017-2019, 2020-2022, as well as the 17 requirements of various U.S. Department of Defense and Navy Instructions. The Revised 18 INRMP is designed to provide for the continuation of military activities while preserving, 19 protecting, and enhancing the natural resources and biodiversity of SCI. This Draft EA evaluates 20 the environmental consequences of the Action Alternative and a No Action Alternative. The 21 Action Alternative will implement the Revised INRMP for SCI. The No Action Alternative 22 would continue implementation of the existing INRMP for SCI completed in 2002 and current 23 management strategies. Implementation of the Revised INRMP will not violate the Anti- 24 Deficiency Act, 31 U.S. Code § 341, et seq. 25 For further information, contact: 26 Rebecca Loomis 27 Environmental Planner 28 U.S. Department of the Navy 29 Naval Facilities and Engineering Command Southwest 30 2730 McKean Street Bldg. 291 31 San Diego, CA 92136 32 33 34 35 36 Abstract i Preliminary Draft July 2012 San Clemente Island, California 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 This Page Intentionally Blank 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ii Abstract Environmental Assessment for the Revised INRMP Preliminary Draft July 2012 1 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations Acronym Phrase °C degree(s) Celsius °F degree(s) Fahrenheit µg/L microgram(s) per liter CFR Code of Federal Regulations CNPS California Native Plant Society CZMA Coastal Zone Management Act DoD U.S. Department of Defense EA Environmental Assessment ER-L Effects Range Low ER-M Effects Range Medium FONSI Finding of No Significant Impact INRMP Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan m meter(s) NALF Naval Auxiliary Landing Field Navy U.S. Department of Navy NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration SCB Southern California Bight SCI San Clemente Island SHOBA Shore Bombardment Area SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board U.S.C. U.S. Code USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations iii Preliminary Draft July 2012 San Clemente Island, California 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 This Page Intentionally Blank 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 iv List of Acronyms and Abbreviations Environmental Assessment for the Revised INRMP Preliminary Draft July 2012 1 Table of Contents 2 1.0 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................. 1-1 3 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 4 1.2 Project Location ..................................................................................................................... 1-1 5 1.3 Purpose and Need for the Project Action ............................................................................... 1-4 6 1.4 Decision to be Made ............................................................................................................... 1-4 7 1.5 Scope of Analysis ................................................................................................................... 1-5 8 1.6 Intergovernmental Coordination ............................................................................................ 1-9 9 1.7 Public/Agency Involvement ................................................................................................. 1-11 10 2.0 Description of Proposed Action and Alternatives .......................................................... 2-1 11 2.1 Reasonable Alternatives Screening Factors ........................................................................... 2-1 12 2.2 Description of Alternatives .................................................................................................... 2-1 13 2.2.1 Proposed Action – Adopt and Implement the Revised INRMP 14 (Preferred Alternative) .............................................................................................. 2-2 15 2.2.2 No Action Alternative – Retain 2002 INRMP and Current 16 Management Strategies ............................................................................................. 2-2 17 3.0 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences ........................................... 3-1 18 3.1 Biological Resources .............................................................................................................. 3-2 19 3.1.1 Affected Environment ............................................................................................... 3-2 20 3.1.2 Vegetation Communities ........................................................................................... 3-2 21 3.1.3 Marine Habitats ......................................................................................................... 3-2 22 3.1.3.1 Sandy Beaches .......................................................................................... 3-2 23 3.1.3.2 Rocky Intertidal and Surfgrass Habitat ..................................................... 3-6 24 3.1.3.2.1 Splash Zone ........................................................................... 3-6 25 3.1.3.2.2 Upper Intertidal ..................................................................... 3-6 26 3.1.3.2.3 Middle Intertidal .................................................................... 3-6 27 3.1.3.2.4 Lower Intertidal ..................................................................... 3-6 28 3.1.3.3 Subtidal Habitats ....................................................................................... 3-7 29 3.1.3.3.1 Soft Bottom ........................................................................... 3-7 30 3.1.3.3.2 Eelgrass ................................................................................. 3-7 31 3.1.3.3.3 Rocky Habitat and Kelp Forests ............................................ 3-8 32 3.1.3.4 Deep Water Habitats ............................................................................... 3-10 33 3.1.3.4.1 Rocky Habitat ...................................................................... 3-10 34 3.1.3.4.2 Soft Bottom ......................................................................... 3-10 35 3.1.3.5 Offshore Rocks and Islets ....................................................................... 3-11 36 3.1.4 Species Assemblages ............................................................................................... 3-13 37 3.1.4.1 Plants ....................................................................................................... 3-13 38 3.1.4.2 Cryptogams ............................................................................................. 3-13 39 3.1.4.3 Macroalgae .............................................................................................. 3-13 40 3.1.4.3.1 Giant Kelp ........................................................................... 3-13 Table of Contents v Preliminary Draft July 2012 San Clemente Island, California 1 3.1.4.3.2 Bull Kelp ............................................................................. 3-13 2 3.1.4.4 Terrestrial Invertebrates .......................................................................... 3-14 3 3.1.4.4.1 Insects .................................................................................. 3-14 4 3.1.4.4.2 Fairy Shrimp ........................................................................ 3-14 5 3.1.4.4.3 Land Snails .......................................................................... 3-15 6 3.1.4.5 Marine Invertebrates ............................................................................... 3-15 7 3.1.4.6 Fishes ...................................................................................................... 3-15 8 3.1.4.6.1 Essential Fish Habitat .......................................................... 3-16 9 3.1.4.7
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Research Paper a Review of Goji Berry (Lycium Barbarum) in Traditional Chinese Medicine As a Promising Organic Superfood And
    Academia Journal of Medicinal Plants 6(12): 437-445, December 2018 DOI: 10.15413/ajmp.2018.0186 ISSN: 2315-7720 ©2018 Academia Publishing Research Paper A review of Goji berry (Lycium barbarum) in Traditional Chinese medicine as a promising organic superfood and superfruit in modern industry Accepted 3rd December, 2018 ABSTRACT Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) has been used for thousands of years by different generations in China and other Asian countries as foods to promote good health and as drugs to treat disease. Goji berry (Lycium barbarum), as a Chinese traditional herb and food supplement, contains many nutrients and phytochemicals, such as polysaccharides, scopoletin, the glucosylated precursor, amino acids, flaconoids, carotenoids, vitamins and minerals. It has positive effects on anitcancer, antioxidant activities, retinal function preservation, anti-diabetes, immune function and anti-fatigue. Widely used in traditional Chinese medicine, Goji berries can be sold as a dietary supplement or classified as nutraceutical food due to their long and safe traditional use. Modern Goji pharmacological actions improve function and enhance the body ,s ability to adapt to a variety of noxious stimuli; it significantly inhibits the generation and spread of cancer cells and can improve eyesight and increase reserves of muscle and liver glycogens which may increase human energy and has anti-fatigue effect. Goji berries may improve brain function and enhance learning and memory. It may boost the body ,s adaptive defences, and significantly reduce the levels of serum cholesterol and triglyceride, it may help weight loss and obesity and treats chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis. At Mohamad Hesam Shahrajabian1,2, Wenli present, they are considered functional food with many beneficial effects, which is Sun1,2 and Qi Cheng1,2* why they have become more popular recently, especially in Europe, North America and Australia, as they are considered as superfood with highly nutritive and 1 Biotechnology Research Institute, antioxidant properties.
    [Show full text]
  • H. Thorsten Lumbsch VP, Science & Education the Field Museum 1400
    H. Thorsten Lumbsch VP, Science & Education The Field Museum 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive Chicago, Illinois 60605 USA Tel: 1-312-665-7881 E-mail: [email protected] Research interests Evolution and Systematics of Fungi Biogeography and Diversification Rates of Fungi Species delimitation Diversity of lichen-forming fungi Professional Experience Since 2017 Vice President, Science & Education, The Field Museum, Chicago. USA 2014-2017 Director, Integrative Research Center, Science & Education, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. Since 2014 Curator, Integrative Research Center, Science & Education, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. 2013-2014 Associate Director, Integrative Research Center, Science & Education, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. 2009-2013 Chair, Dept. of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. Since 2011 MacArthur Associate Curator, Dept. of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. 2006-2014 Associate Curator, Dept. of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. 2005-2009 Head of Cryptogams, Dept. of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. Since 2004 Member, Committee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago. Courses: BIOS 430 Evolution (UIC), BIOS 23410 Complex Interactions: Coevolution, Parasites, Mutualists, and Cheaters (U of C) Reading group: Phylogenetic methods. 2003-2006 Assistant Curator, Dept. of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. 1998-2003 Privatdozent (Assistant Professor), Botanical Institute, University – GHS - Essen. Lectures: General Botany, Evolution of lower plants, Photosynthesis, Courses: Cryptogams, Biology
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Version of Palos Verdes
    Selected Plants Native to Palos Verdes Peninsula (C.M. Rodrigue, 07/26/11) http://www.csulb.edu/geography/PV/ Succulents (plants with fleshy, often liquid-saturated leaves and/or stems. These features can be found in a variety of life forms, including annual herbaceous plants, vines, shrubs, and trees, as well as cacti) Herbaceous plants (non-woody, though there may be a woody caudex or basal stem and root -- annual growth dies back each year, resprouting in perennial or biennial plants, or the plant dies and is replaced by a new generation each year in the case of annual plants) Extremely tiny plant. Stems only about 2-6 cm tall, occasionally as much as 10 cm, leaves only 1-3 mm long (can get up to 6 mm long), fleshy, found at the plant's base or on the stems, shape generally ovate (egg-shaped), may have a blunt rounded end or a fine acute tip. The leaves are arranged oppositely, not alternately. The plant is green when new but ages to red or pink. Tiny flower (0.5- 2 mm) borne in leaf axils, usually just one per leaf pair on a pedicel (floral stem) less than 6 mm long. Two or 3 petals and 3 or 4 sepals. Flowers February to May. Annual herb. Found in open areas, in rocky nooks and crannies, and sometimes in vernal ponds (temporary pools that form after a rain and then slowly evaporate). Crassula connata (Crassulaceae): pygmy stonecrop or pygmy-weed or sand pygmyweed Leaves converted into scales along stems, which are arranged alternately and overlap.
    [Show full text]
  • SAN DIEGO COUNTY NATIVE PLANTS in the 1830S
    SAN DIEGO COUNTY NATIVE PLANTS IN THE 1830s The Collections of Thomas Coulter, Thomas Nuttall, and H.M.S. Sulphur with George Barclay and Richard Hinds James Lightner San Diego Flora San Diego, California 2013 SAN DIEGO COUNTY NATIVE PLANTS IN THE 1830s Preface The Collections of Thomas Coulter, Thomas Nuttall, and Our knowledge of the natural environment of the San Diego region H.M.S. Sulphur with George Barclay and Richard Hinds in the first half of the 19th century is understandably vague. Referenc- es in historical sources are limited and anecdotal. As prosperity peaked Copyright © 2013 James Lightner around 1830, probably no more than 200 inhabitants in the region could read and write. At most one or two were trained in natural sciences or All rights reserved medicine. The best insights we have into the landscape come from nar- No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form ratives of travelers and the periodic reports of the missions’ lands. They without permission in writing from the publisher. provide some idea of the extent of agriculture and the general vegeta- tion covering surrounding land. ISBN: 978-0-9749981-4-5 The stories of the visits of United Kingdom naturalists who came in Library of Congress Control Number: 2013907489 the 1830s illuminate the subject. They were educated men who came to the territory intentionally to examine the flora. They took notes and col- Cover photograph: lected specimens as botanists do today. Reviewing their contributions Matilija Poppy (Romneya trichocalyx), Barrett Lake, San Diego County now, we can imagine what they saw as they discovered plants we know.
    [Show full text]
  • Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa Alan B
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 29 | Issue 1 Article 4 2011 Plants of the Colonet Region, Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa Alan B. Harper Terra Peninsular, Coronado, California Sula Vanderplank Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, California Mark Dodero Recon Environmental Inc., San Diego, California Sergio Mata Terra Peninsular, Coronado, California Jorge Ochoa Long Beach City College, Long Beach, California Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Botany Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Harper, Alan B.; Vanderplank, Sula; Dodero, Mark; Mata, Sergio; and Ochoa, Jorge (2011) "Plants of the Colonet Region, Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 29: Iss. 1, Article 4. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol29/iss1/4 Aliso, 29(1), pp. 25–42 ’ 2011, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden PLANTS OF THE COLONET REGION, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO, AND A VEGETATION MAPOF COLONET MESA ALAN B. HARPER,1 SULA VANDERPLANK,2 MARK DODERO,3 SERGIO MATA,1 AND JORGE OCHOA4 1Terra Peninsular, A.C., PMB 189003, Suite 88, Coronado, California 92178, USA ([email protected]); 2Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 1500 North College Avenue, Claremont, California 91711, USA; 3Recon Environmental Inc., 1927 Fifth Avenue, San Diego, California 92101, USA; 4Long Beach City College, 1305 East Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach, California 90806, USA ABSTRACT The Colonet region is located at the southern end of the California Floristic Province, in an area known to have the highest plant diversity in Baja California.
    [Show full text]
  • S1 the Three Areas of Importance for the Fruticose Ramalinaceae.FINAL
    Supplementary Data S1 Three Major Ecogeographic Areas of Evolution in Fruticose Ramalinaceae Three geographical areas appear significant to the evolutionary history of lichens in arid regions. We focus on three fruticose genera of the Ramalinaceae: Nambialina (gen. nov.), Niebla, and Vermilacinia. They have adapted to obtaining moisture from fog in the following coastal regions of our study: (I) California-Baja California coastal chaparral and Vizcaíno deserts (II) South America Atacama and Sechura deserts (III) South Africa coastal fynbos and Namib Desert The botanical significance of each of these will be briefly discussed. Chapter (I) further includes updates on the ecogeographical data and evolutionary interpretation for the genera Niebla and Vermilacinia in Baja California. (I) California and Baja California Coastal Chaparral, Chaparral-Desert Transition and Vizcaíno Deserts 1. California and Baja California Coastal Chaparral The lichen flora of the Baja California peninsula (Mexico, Baja California and Baja California Sur) is pretty well known as a result of the many splendid contributions by lichenologists to the « Lichen Flora of the Greater Sonoran Desert Region » (Nash et al. 2002, 2004, 2007). The « Greater » portion extends the lichen flora to chaparral, oak woodlands, and conifer forests in southern California, northern Baja California and southern Nevada and all of Arizona; to the deserts of Mojave, Arizona, Vizcaíno, and Magdalena; and to the subtropical vegetation in Baja California Sur and Sonora, Mexico that include lowland mixed deciduous-succulent bushlands, open deciduous montane woodlands/forests, and the evergreen pine-oak woodlands/forests. California, a botanically rich and diverse region with many endemic species (Raven and Axelrod 1978 ; Calsbeek et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Isalonactis, a New Genus of Roccellaceae (Arthoniales), from Southern Madagascar
    The Lichenologist 46(2): 159–167 (2014) 6 British Lichen Society, 2014 doi:10.1017/S002428291300090X Isalonactis, a new genus of Roccellaceae (Arthoniales), from southern Madagascar Damien ERTZ, Anders TEHLER, Eberhard FISCHER, Dorothee KILLMANN, Tahina RAZAFINDRAHAJA and Emmanue¨lSE´ RUSIAUX Abstract: The new genus and species Isalonactis madagascariensis is characterized by a crustose, non- corticate, often sorediate thallus containing psoromic acid, tiny white pruinose ascomata with a thalline margin, an inconspicuous excipulum, a pale brown hypothecium, 3-septate hyaline ascospores and curved filiform conidia. Phylogenetic analyses using nuLSU and RPB2 sequences place Isalonactis in the Roccellaceae, close to the genera Lecanactis and Chiodecton. The new species was collected on sheltered siliceous rocks in the dry landscape of the Isalo Massif (S Madagascar). Dermatiscum thunbergii is newly recorded from Madagascar. Key words: Africa, Arthoniomycetes, desert, Lecanactis, lichen, phylogeny, taxonomy Accepted for publication 27 November 2013 Introduction the neighbouring and much smaller island of Reunion (van den Boom et al. 2011). Dur- Madagascar is a large island situated in the ing a field trip in 2008, five of the authors Indian Ocean at a minimum distance of 400 (DE, EF, DK, TR and ES) were able to km from the African continent. It is well prospect several biomes, for example mon- known for its remarkable biodiversity in- tane rainforests, dry forests, semideserts with cluding many endemic taxa (Goodman & rock outcrops, and detected numerous new Benstead 2003). Despite the island being records for the island. Most of these were one of the most important biodiversity hot- widespread species not confined to Mada- spots (Myers et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Clarification Regarding Old Records of Roccella in the Maltese Islands
    Mycosphere 6 (6): 673–680 (2015) ISSN 2077 7019 www.mycosphere.org Article Mycosphere Copyright © 2015 Online Edition Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/6/6/4 Clarification regarding old records of Roccella in the Maltese Islands Fiorentino J1 1Department of Biology, University Junior College, Msida MSD 1252 , Malta [email protected] Fiorentino J 2015 – Clarification regarding old records of Roccella in the Maltese Islands. Mycosphere 6(6), 673–680, Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/6/6/4 Abstract The only checklist of lichens of the Maltese Islands dates back to 1915 and includes both Roccella phycopsis and R. tinctoria. Material present in local collections and carrying the labels Roccella fucoides, R. phycopsis and R. tinctoria were examined and all were found to be Roccella phycopsis. Fresh specimens of Roccella from different areas were also collected and identified. Study has lead to the conclusion that early records of R. tinctoria are incorrect and that to date the only species of this genus found in the Maltese Islands is Roccella phycopsis Ach. Key words – Mediterranean – R. phycopsis – R. tinctoria – Roccellaceae. Introduction Roccella DC. is a subtropical genus of lichen fungi within the family Roccellaceae and having a preference for areas with Mediterranean climates but also extending into adjacent temperate and tropical regions. It is predominantly distributed in the northern hemisphere and restricted to coastal habitats where it may locally be very common (Tehler et al. 2009). Roccella is a fruticose lichen containing Trentepohlia algae as a photobiont. The thallus is a white-greyish to greyish-brown pendent thallus of flattened or terete branches, normally 5–15 cm long.
    [Show full text]
  • Ajo Peak to Tinajas Altas: a Flora of Southwestern Arizona. Part 20
    Felger, R.S. and S. Rutman. 2016. Ajo Peak to Tinajas Altas: A Flora of Southwestern Arizona. Part 20. Eudicots: Solanaceae to Zygophyllaceae. Phytoneuron 2016-52: 1–66. Published 4 August 2016. ISSN 2153 733X AJO PEAK TO TINAJAS ALTAS: A FLORA OF SOUTHWESTERN ARIZONA PART 20. EUDICOTS: SOLANACEAE TO ZYGOPHYLLACEAE RICHARD STEPHEN FELGER Herbarium, University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 & International Sonoran Desert Alliance PO Box 687 Ajo, Arizona 85321 *Author for correspondence: [email protected] SUSAN RUTMAN 90 West 10th Street Ajo, Arizona 85321 [email protected] ABSTRACT A floristic account is provided for Solanaceae, Talinaceae, Tamaricaceae, Urticaceae, Verbenaceae, and Zygophyllaceae as part of the vascular plant flora of the contiguous protected areas of Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge, and the Tinajas Altas Region in southwestern Arizona—the heart of the Sonoran Desert. This account includes 40 taxa, of which about 10 taxa are represented by fossil specimens from packrat middens. This is the twentieth contribution for this flora, published in Phytoneuron and also posted open access on the website of the University of Arizona Herbarium: <http//cals.arizona.edu/herbarium/content/flora-sw-arizona>. Six eudicot families are included in this contribution (Table 1): Solanaceae (9 genera, 21 species), Talinaceae (1 species), Tamaricaceae (1 genus, 2 species), Urticaceae (2 genera, 2 species), Verbenaceae (4 genera, 7 species), and Zygophyllaceae (4 genera, 7 species). The flora area covers 5141 km 2 (1985 mi 2) of contiguous protected areas in the heart of the Sonoran Desert (Figure 1). The first article in this series includes maps and brief descriptions of the physical, biological, ecological, floristic, and deep history of the flora area (Felger et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Rule for 16 Plant Taxa from the Northern Channel Islands
    Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 25, 1995 / Proposed Rules 37993 Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Final promulgation of the regulations Carlsbad Field Office (see ADDRESSES Services, Endangered Species Permits, on these species will take into section). 911 N.E. 11th Avenue, Portland, Oregon consideration the comments and any Author. The primary author of this 97232±4181 (telephone 503/231±2063; additional information received by the document is Debra Kinsinger, Carlsbad Field facsimile 503/231±6243). Service, and such communications may Office (see ADDRESSES section). lead to a final regulation that differs Public Comments Solicited List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17 from this proposal. The Service intends that any final The Endangered Species Act provides Endangered and threatened species, action resulting from this proposal will for one or more public hearings on this Exports, Imports, Reporting and be as accurate and as effective as proposal, if requested. Requests must be recordkeeping requirements, and possible. Therefore, comments or received by September 25, 1995. Such Transportation. suggestions from the public, other requests must be made in writing and concerned governmental agencies, the addressed to the Field Supervisor of the Proposed Regulation Promulgation scientific community, industry, or any Carlsbad Field Office (see ADDRESSES Accordingly, the Service hereby other interested party concerning this section). proposes to amend part 17, subchapter proposed rule are hereby solicited. National Environmental Policy Act B of chapter I, title 50 of the Code of Comments particularly are sought Federal Regulations, as set forth below: concerning: The Fish and Wildlife Service has (1) Biological, commercial trade, or determined that Environmental PART 17Ð[AMENDED] other relevant data concerning any Assessments or Environmental Impact threat (or lack thereof) to Sibara filifolia, Statements, as defined under the 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of The
    Bulletin of the Califqrnia Lichen Society Volume 6 No. 2 Winter 1999 The California Lichen Society seeks to promote the appreciation, conservation , and study of t he li chens . The interests of the Society include the entire western part of the continent, although the principal focus is on California. Dues are $18 per year ( $20 for foreign subscribers) payable to The Cal ifornia Lichen Society, 362 Scenic Ave., Santa Rosa , CA, 95407. Members receive the Bulletin and notices of meetings, field trips , and workshops. Board Members of the California Lichen Society: President: Judy Robertson Vice President: Darrell Wright Secretary: Charis Bratt Treasurer: Bill Hill Member at Large: Richard Moe The Bulletin of the California Lichen Society (ISSN 1 093-9148) is edited by Isabelle Tavares, Shirley Tucker, William Sanders, Richard Moe, and Darrell Wright and is produced by Richard Moe. The Bulletin welcomes manuscripts on technical topics in lichenology relating to western North America and on conservation of the lichens, as well as news of lichenologists and their activities . Manuscripts may be submitted to Richard Moe, Bulletin of the California Lichen Society, University Herbarium, 1001 Valley Life Sciences Bldg . #2465, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-2465. The best way to submit manuscripts apart from short articles and announcements is by E-mail or on diskette in WordPerfect or Microsoft Word format; ASCI I format is a very good alternative. Manuscripts should be double-spaced. Figures are the usual line drawings and sharp black and white glossy photos, unmounted, and must be sent by surface mail. A review process is followed.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Rock-Inhabiting Fungi Related to Dothideomycetes
    available online at www.studiesinmycology.org StudieS in Mycology 64: 123–133. 2009. doi:10.3114/sim.2009.64.06 Phylogeny of rock-inhabiting fungi related to Dothideomycetes C. Ruibal1*, C. Gueidan2, L. Selbmann3, A.A. Gorbushina4, P.W. Crous2, J.Z. Groenewald2, L. Muggia5, M. Grube5, D. Isola3, C.L. Schoch6, J.T. Staley7, F. Lutzoni8, G.S. de Hoog2 1Departamento de Ingeniería y Ciencia de los Materiales, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain; 2CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, P.O. Box 85167, 3508 AD Utrecht, Netherlands; 3DECOS, Università degli Studi della Tuscia, Largo dell’Università, Viterbo, Italy; 4Free University of Berlin and Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM), Department IV “Materials and Environment”, Unter den Eichen 87, 12205 Berlin, Germany; 5Institute für Pflanzenwissenschaften, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Holteigasse 6, A-8010 Graz, Austria; 6NCBI/NLM/NIH, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda MD 20892, U.S.A.; 7Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Box 357242, Seattle WA 98195, U.S.A.; 8Department of Biology, Duke University, Box 90338, Durham NC 27708, U.S.A. *Correspondence: Constantino Ruibal, [email protected] Abstract: The class Dothideomycetes (along with Eurotiomycetes) includes numerous rock-inhabiting fungi (RIF), a group of ascomycetes that tolerates surprisingly well harsh conditions prevailing on rock surfaces. Despite their convergent morphology and physiology, RIF are phylogenetically highly diverse in Dothideomycetes. However, the positions of main groups of RIF in this class remain unclear due to the lack of a strong phylogenetic framework. Moreover, connections between rock-dwelling habit and other lifestyles found in Dothideomycetes such as plant pathogens, saprobes and lichen-forming fungi are still unexplored.
    [Show full text]