DOCSLIB.ORG

UC Berkeley Dissertations, Department of Linguistics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UC Berkeley Dissertations, Department of Linguistics UC Berkeley Dissertations, Department of Linguistics Title The Functions and Evolution of Topic and Focus Markers Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/450756hb Author Radetzky, Paula Publication Date 2002 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Functions and Evolution of Topic and Focus Markers by Paula Kadose Radetzky B.A. (Columbia University) 1991 M.A. (University of California, Berkeley) 1996 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Committee in charge: Professor Richard A. Rhodes, Co-chair Professor Eve E. Sweetser, Co-chair Professor H. Mack Horton Spring 2002 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Abstract The Functions and Evolution of Topic and Focus Markers by Paula Kadose Radetzky Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California, Berkeley Professors Richard A. Rhodes and Eve E. Sweetser, Co-chairs This dissertation examines the notions of topic and focus from both synchronic and diachronic points of view. Previous works have almost exclusively treated these concepts synchronically, and the historical studies which do exist have not successfully traced and motivated the individual stages of development. The sections on topic first propose and give cross-linguistic evidence for the following path of grammaticalization: locative/ contrastive topic marker > marker > marker This overview is followed by two text-based studies, one of the Japanese topic marker wa and the other of the Greek particle de. Because of their long written traditions, these two languages allow us to contextually view and motivate the intermediate stages of grammaticalization. The last part of the dissertation is a discussion of focus. It begins by developing a synchronic theory involving different levels of highlighting, and then it presents case studies of data primarily from Japanese and Korean, examining in detail the mechanisms by which demonstratives and copulas become focus markers in these languages. The analysis 1 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. presented also provides an explanation for hitherto unaccounted-for distributional facts about the Japanese and Korean focus markers. Topic and focus have been seen by linguists as widespread phenomena cross- Iinguistically, and yet it has proven difficult to define these intuitively important analytic units. A functional and diachronic approach helps both to elucidate their nature and to explain the complexities which have made them hard for analysts to pin down. 2 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Acknowledgments The set of problems addressed in this dissertation have occupied my thoughts during much of my career at Berkeley. Throughout that time I have received help, encouragement, and valuable criticism from more people than I can name here. There are a few. however, without whose help this project would never have come to fruition. My dissertation co-chairs. Richard Rhodes and Eve Sweetser. have provided advice and encouragement throughout the whole process, and especially at the end. I would also like to thank Mack Horton. Dan Slobin. and Elizabeth Traugott. who offered their expertise and good cheer. To my great friend and advocate. Bill Weigel. I owe special thanks. Others who provided advice, read chapters, and were otherwise generous in their intellectual and emotional support include: Masamitsu Akahane, Melinda Chen. Yoon-Suk Chung. Charles Fillmore, Michael Fishlen. Noriko Fujii. Andrew Garrett,Tetsuo Harada. Gary Holland. Heather Rose Jones. Terry Kaufman. Paul Kay. Alex Madonik. Seiichi Makino. James Matisoff. John McWhorter. Kyung-Hwan Mo, Koji Nabeshima. Jason Patent. Barbara Ruch.Tomoko Yamashita Smith. Tony Smith. Leonard Talmy. and Enric Vallduvi. Part of the gestation period for this dissertation occurred in Taiwan. During my stay there, many Austronesianists provided assistance, suggestions, and feedback: Edith Aldridge. Robert Blust. Dah-An Ho.Tien-Hsin Hsin. Lillian Huang. Paul Li. Malcolm Ross. Shigeru Tsuchida. and Elizabeth Zeitoun. For welcoming me into their homes and providing me with a sense of community, 1 would especially like to thank my friends from i Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. the field: Hatchan. Subali Ismahasan, Inadanedeke and Laa?u Lauracana. Utay Raqix. Dagoy and Pi?i Tabuyana, Isuz Tamapima. Kilakilau Tumamadikisase, Abas Utay, Api Zhu. and Paupau and three other dogs. The ideas contained in this dissertation I dedicate to my parents, Harold Rogers (ne Harold Radetzky) and Sophie F. Rogers (nee Kadose. Fumie). ii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Chapter I Introduction The study of topic and focus marking encompasses two generally disparate areas of inquiry. In the area of diachrony, the evolution of discourse markers is not so well understood that it can be analyzed in the almost mechanical way that sound change can. In the area of synchronic grammatical theory, the very questions of what it means to be a topic or to be focused have not been given widely agreed-upon answers. This dissertation will address both areas, each controversial in its own right, using the tools of cognitive grammar and grammaticalization theory to bring a degree of order to each. The methods used in historical linguistics have traditionally consisted of comparative and typological studies. Until fairly recently, comparative linguists have tended to concentrate on establishing phonological correspondences and etymologies for lexical items (e.g.. Meillet 1937, Gamkrelidze & Ivanov 1984 f 19951). Even in the cases where comparative linguists have examined non-Iexical constructions, either their work has had as its main goal to reconstruct proto-languages (e.g.. Lehmann 1974) or, when not aimed at reconstruction, has been theory-driven rather than data-driven (e.g., Lightfoot 1979, Hawkins 1983). Neither of these kinds of studies include the newer methodologies of historical discourse and text analysis. This is particularly true of studies of topic and focus. In the rare cases where topic and focus constructions have been treated diachronically, the emphasis has been on word order (e.g., Lehmann 1973, Lehmann 1974, Vennetnann 1974, Givon 1979, Heine & Reh 1984)—and, in fact, without the tools that I Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. grammaticalization theory provides, such as the notions of decategorialization, scopal increase, situational ambiguity, bridging contexts, and layering, there is not much beyond word order reconstruction that is possible. Furthermore, the traditional historical linguist’s focus on (a) forms extant at a certain point in time and (b) the description of how they arose generally allows for little reference to discourse and pragmatics. The result has often been superficial and not sufficiently explanatory. This is paralleled in the field of historical morphology, where traditional historical linguists have tended to focus on the end result of grammaticalization. that is. fully morphologized items. Not having the tools of modem grammaticalization theory, historical linguists have not conceived of the mechanism a language chooses for expressing a certain idea as being one of a constrained set of several possible constructions, nor have they investigated whether layering had occurred—i.e.. whether other isofunctional constructions had ever existed simultaneously in the language. The traditional understanding of the mechanisms of change has. in fact, often included little more than the Neogrammarian maxims of regularity and gradualness. In sum. then, traditional comparative linguistics did not often provide cognitively plausible explanations for the steps involved in semantic change and grammaticalization. In contrast, grammaticalization theory offers more powerful tools for analyzing the semantics of topic and focus. The notions of topic and focus have proven elusive to modem synchronic linguistics; indeed, few researchers can agree on how to characterize the notions and incorporate them into a theory of grammar (e.g.. Chafe 1976, Reinhart 1982, Portner & Yabushita 1988, Lambrecht 1994, Biiring 1997, Vallduvf 1992). However, we shall see below that synchronic theories concerning topic can be refined and made more precise by looking at how sentence-initial locative phrases can evolve into topics over time. This is because, as grammaticalization theory predicts, remnants of the space-building semantics (Fauconnier I98S, Fauconnier 1997) inherent in the locative stage carry over into the semantics of the topic stage. My position, then, is not that synchrony 2 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. must recapitulate diachrony but that often, by examining such notions as topic and focus in conjunction with diachrony, we can more accurately characterize the synchronic state of affairs. It is worth noting that this application of grammaticalization theory is broader than is understood by many linguists, who conceive of grammaticalization as taking place at the word or morpheme level.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Basic Morphology
    What is Morphology? Mark Aronoff and Kirsten Fudeman MORPHOLOGY AND MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS 1 1 Thinking about Morphology and Morphological Analysis 1.1 What is Morphology? 1 1.2 Morphemes 2 1.3 Morphology in Action 4 1.3.1 Novel words and word play 4 1.3.2 Abstract morphological facts 6 1.4 Background and Beliefs 9 1.5 Introduction to Morphological Analysis 12 1.5.1 Two basic approaches: analysis and synthesis 12 1.5.2 Analytic principles 14 1.5.3 Sample problems with solutions 17 1.6 Summary 21 Introduction to Kujamaat Jóola 22 mor·phol·o·gy: a study of the structure or form of something Merriam-Webster Unabridged n 1.1 What is Morphology? The term morphology is generally attributed to the German poet, novelist, playwright, and philosopher Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749–1832), who coined it early in the nineteenth century in a biological context. Its etymology is Greek: morph- means ‘shape, form’, and morphology is the study of form or forms. In biology morphology refers to the study of the form and structure of organisms, and in geology it refers to the study of the configuration and evolution of land forms. In linguistics morphology refers to the mental system involved in word formation or to the branch 2 MORPHOLOGYMORPHOLOGY ANDAND MORPHOLOGICAL MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS ANALYSIS of linguistics that deals with words, their internal structure, and how they are formed. n 1.2 Morphemes A major way in which morphologists investigate words, their internal structure, and how they are formed is through the identification and study of morphemes, often defined as the smallest linguistic pieces with a gram- matical function.
    [Show full text]
  • The Japanese Writing Systems, Script Reforms and the Eradication of the Kanji Writing System: Native Speakers’ Views Lovisa Österman
    The Japanese writing systems, script reforms and the eradication of the Kanji writing system: native speakers’ views Lovisa Österman Lund University, Centre for Languages and Literature Bachelor’s Thesis Japanese B.A. Course (JAPK11 Spring term 2018) Supervisor: Shinichiro Ishihara Abstract This study aims to deduce what Japanese native speakers think of the Japanese writing systems, and in particular what native speakers’ opinions are concerning Kanji, the logographic writing system which consists of Chinese characters. The Japanese written language has something that most languages do not; namely a total of ​ ​ three writing systems. First, there is the Kana writing system, which consists of the two syllabaries: Hiragana and Katakana. The two syllabaries essentially figure the same way, but are used for different purposes. Secondly, there is the Rōmaji writing system, which is Japanese written using latin letters. And finally, there is the Kanji writing system. Learning this is often at first an exhausting task, because not only must one learn the two phonematic writing systems (Hiragana and Katakana), but to be able to properly read and write in Japanese, one should also learn how to read and write a great amount of logographic signs; namely the Kanji. For example, to be able to read and understand books or newspaper without using any aiding tools such as dictionaries, one would need to have learned the 2136 Jōyō Kanji (regular-use Chinese characters). With the twentieth century’s progress in technology, comparing with twenty years ago, in this day and age one could probably theoretically get by alright without knowing how to write Kanji by hand, seeing as we are writing less and less by hand and more by technological devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Korean: a Grammar and Workbook
    BASIC KOREAN: A GRAMMAR AND WORKBOOK Basic Korean: A Grammar and Workbook comprises an accessible reference grammar and related exercises in a single volume. This workbook presents twenty-five individual grammar points in lively and realistic contexts, covering the core material which students would expect to encounter in their first year of learning Korean. Grammar points are followed by examples and exercises which allow students to reinforce and consolidate their learning. Basic Korean is suitable for both class use as well as independent study. Key features include: • abundant exercises with full answer key • all Korean entries presented in Hangul with English translations • subject index. Clearly presented and user-friendly, Basic Korean provides readers with the essential tools to express themselves in a wide variety of situations, making it an ideal grammar reference and practice resource for both beginners and students with some knowledge of the language. Andrew Sangpil Byon is Associate Professor at the State University of New York at Albany, where he teaches courses in Korean language and civilization. 99780415774871_A01.indd780415774871_A 01.ind d i i 77/4/2008/4/2008 11:43:04:43:04 PPMM Other titles available in the Grammar Workbooks series are: Basic Cantonese Intermediate Cantonese Basic Chinese Intermediate Chinese Basic German Intermediate German Basic Italian Basic Irish Intermediate Irish Basic Polish Intermediate Polish Basic Russian Intermediate Russian Basic Spanish Intermediate Spanish Basic Welsh Intermediate Welsh
    [Show full text]
  • Korean Honorific Speech Style Shift: Intra-Speaker
    KOREAN HONORIFIC SPEECH STYLE SHIFT: INTRA-SPEAKER VARIABLES AND CONTEXT A DISSERATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN EAST ASIAN LANGUAGES AND LITERATURES (KOREAN) MAY 2014 By Sumi Chang Dissertation Committee: Ho-min Sohn, Chairperson Dong Jae Lee Mee Jeong Park Lourdes Ortega Richard Schmidt Keywords: Korean honorifics, grammaticalization, indexicality, stance, identity ⓒ Copyright 2014 by Sumi Chang ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS No words can express my appreciation to all the people who have helped me over the course of my doctoral work which has been a humbling and enlightening experience. First, I want to express my deepest gratitude to my Chair, Professor Ho-min Sohn, for his intellectual guidance, enthusiasm, and constant encouragement. I feel very fortunate to have been under his tutelage and supervision. I also wish to thank his wife, Mrs. Sook-Hi Sohn samonim, whose kindness and generosity extended to all the graduate students, making each of us feel special and at home over the years. Among my committee members, I am particularly indebted to Professor Dong Jae Lee for continuing to serve on my committee even after his retirement. His thoughtfulness and sense of humor alleviated the concerns and the pressure I was under. Professor Mee Jeong Park always welcomed my questions and helped me organize my jumbled thoughts. Her support and reassurance, especially in times of self-doubt, have been true blessings. Professor Lourdes Ortega's invaluable comments since my MA days provided me with a clear direction and goal.
    [Show full text]
  • Vs. Object Marker /Ta
    ISSN 1799-2591 Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 3, No. 7, pp. 1081-1092, July 2013 © 2013 ACADEMY PUBLISHER Manufactured in Finland. doi:10.4304/tpls.3.7.1081-1092 On the Usage of Sinhalese Differential Object Markers Object Marker /wa/ vs. Object Marker /ta/ Kanduboda A, B. Prabath Ritsumeikan University, Ritsumeikan International, Global Gateway Program, Japan Abstract—Previous studies (Aisen, 2003; Kanduboda, 2011) on Sinhalese language have suggested that direct objects (i.e., accusative marked nouns) in active sentences can be marked by two distinctive case markers. In some sentences, accusative nouns can be denoted by the accusative case marker /wa/. In other sentences, the same nouns can again be denoted by the dative case marker /ta/. However, the verbs required by these accusatives were not investigated in the previous studies. Thus, the present study further conducted an investigation to observe whether these two types of case markings can occur with the same verbs. A free productivity task was conducted with 100 Sinhalese native speakers living in Sri Lanka. A comparison study was carried out using sentences with the verbs accompanying /wa/ accusatives and /ta/ accusatives. The results showed that, verbs accompanied by /wa/ case marker and verbs accompanied by /ta/ case marker are incongruent. Thus, this study concluded that Sinhalese active sentences consisting of transitive verbs are broadly divided into two patterns; those which take only /wa/ accusatives and those which take only /ta/ accusatives. Index Terms—Sinhalese language, active sentences, transitive verbs, /wa/ accusatives, /ta/ accusatives I. INTRODUCTION Sinhalese (also referred to as Sinhala, Singhala and Singhalese, (Englebretson & Carol, 2005)) is one of the major languages spoken in Sri Lanka.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Dilemmas in English Composition Among Asian College Students Shuko Nawa University of North Florida
    UNF Digital Commons UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship 1995 An Analysis Of Dilemmas In English Composition Among Asian College Students Shuko Nawa University of North Florida Suggested Citation Nawa, Shuko, "An Analysis Of Dilemmas In English Composition Among Asian College Students" (1995). UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 83. https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd/83 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at UNF Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UNF Digital Commons. For more information, please contact Digital Projects. © 1995 All Rights Reserved AN ANALYSIS OF DILEMMAS IN ENGLISH COMPOSITION AMONG ASIAN COLLEGE STUDENTS by Shuko Nawa A thesis submitted to the Department of Curriculum and Instruction in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Education UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN SERVICES May, 1995 Unpublished work © Shuko Nawa Certificate of Approval The thesis ofShuko Nawa is approved: (Date) Signature Deleted Signature Deleted Signature Deleted Accepted for the Division: Signature Deleted Chairperson Accepted for the College: Signature Deleted Accepted for the University Signature Deleted Dedication and Acknowledgement This study is dedicated to the researcher's father, Nobuhide Nawa, who taught the importance of learning and exhibited continuous efforts to become a better person through his life. The researcher gratefully acknowledges the assistance of Dr. Priscilla VanZandt, Dr. Patricia Ellis, and Mrs. Mary Thornton in preparing research materials. Conscientious reviewing by Miss Suzanne Fuss is also deeply appreciated. The researcher would like to extend special thanks to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Number Systems in Grammar Position Paper
    1 Language and Culture Research Centre: 2018 Workshop Number systems in grammar - position paper Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald I Introduction I 2 The meanings of nominal number 2 3 Special number distinctions in personal pronouns 8 4 Number on verbs 9 5 The realisation of number 12 5.1 The forms 12 5.2 The loci: where number is shown 12 5.3 Optional and obligatory number marking 14 5.4 The limits of number 15 5.4.1 Number and the meanings of nouns 15 5.4.2 'Minor' numbers 16 5.4.3 The limits of number: nouns with defective number values 16 6 Number and noun categorisation 17 7 Markedness 18 8 Split, or mixed, number systems 19 9 Number and social deixis 19 10 Expressing number through other means 20 11 Number systems in language history 20 12 Summary 21 Further readings 22 Abbreviations 23 References 23 1 Introduction Every language has some means of distinguishing reference to one individual from reference to more than one. Number reference can be coded through lexical modifiers (including quantifiers of various sorts or number words etc.), or through a grammatical system. Number is a referential property of an argument of the predicate. A grammatical system of number can be shown either • Overtly, on a noun, a pronoun, a verb, etc., directly referring to how many people or things are involved; or • Covertly, through agreement or other means. Number may be marked: • within an NP • on the head of an NP • by agreement process on a modifier (adjective, article, demonstrative, etc.) • through agreement on verbs, or special suppletive or semi-suppletive verb forms which may code the number of one or more verbal arguments, or additional marker on the verb.
    [Show full text]
  • Plural Addressee Marker and Grammaticalization in Barayin
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by SOAS Research Online Published as: Lovestrand, Joseph. 2018. Plural addressee marker and Pre-publication version grammaticalization in Barayin. Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 10(1) https://doi.org/10.1163/18776930-01001004 Accepted version downloaded from SOAS Research Online: http:// eprints.soas.ac.uk/32651 Plural addressee marker and grammaticalization in Barayin Joseph Lovestrand, University of Oxford Abstract This article describes two distinct but related grammaticalization paths in Barayin, an East Chadic lan- guage. One path is from a first-person plural pronoun to a first-person dual pronoun. Synchronically, the pronominal forms in Barayin with first-person dual number must now be combined with a plural addressee enclitic, nà, to create a first-person plural pronoun. This path is identical to what has been documented in Philippine-type languages. The other path is from a first-person dative suffix to a suffix dedicated to first-person hortative. This path of grammaticalization has not been discussed in the literature. It occurred in several related languages, and each in case results in a hortative form with a dual subject. Hortative forms with a plural subject are created by adding a plural addressee marker to the dual form. The plural addressee marker in Chadic languages is derived from a second-person pronominal. Keywords Chadic, Barayin, hortative, dual, pronouns, diachronic1 1 Introduction This paper describes two distinct but related grammaticalization paths in Barayin [bva] and other lan- guages of the Guera subbranch of East Chadic languages (East Chadic B).
    [Show full text]
  • The Functions and Evolution of Topic and Focus Markers
    The Functions and Evolution of Topic and Focus Markers by Paula Kadose Radetzky B.A. (Columbia University) 1991 M.A. (University of California, Berkeley) 1996 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Committee in charge: Professor Richard A. Rhodes, Co-chair Professor Eve E. Sweetser, Co-chair Professor H. Mack Horton Spring 2002 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Abstract The Functions and Evolution of Topic and Focus Markers by Paula Kadose Radetzky Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California, Berkeley Professors Richard A. Rhodes and Eve E. Sweetser, Co-chairs This dissertation examines the notions of topic and focus from both synchronic and diachronic points of view. Previous works have almost exclusively treated these concepts synchronically, and the historical studies which do exist have not successfully traced and motivated the individual stages of development. The sections on topic first propose and give cross-linguistic evidence for the following path of grammaticalization: locative/ contrastive topic marker > marker > marker This overview is followed by two text-based studies, one of the Japanese topic marker wa and the other of the Greek particle de. Because of their long written traditions, these two languages allow us to contextually view and motivate the intermediate stages of grammaticalization. The last part of the dissertation is a discussion of focus. It begins by developing a synchronic theory involving different levels of highlighting, and then it presents case studies of data primarily from Japanese and Korean, examining in detail the mechanisms by which demonstratives and copulas become focus markers in these languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Causatives in Korean: Problems in Grammatical Polysemy and Constructional Relations
    Morphological Causatives in Korean: Problems in Grammatical Polysemy and Constructional Relations by Jeong-Woon Park B.A. (Hankuk University of Foreign Studies) 1983 M.A (Hankuk University of Foreign Studies) 1985 M.A. (University of California at Berkeley) 1990 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA at BERKELEY Committee in charge: Professor Charles J. Fillmore, Co-Chair Professor Eve Sweetser, Co-Chair Professor George Lakoff Professor Alan Timberlake Professor Peter Sells 1994 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. The dissertation of Jeong-Woon Park is approved: Co-Chaii Dai t ??y Co-i fefcrCl/A___________ University of California at Berkeley 1994 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Morphological Causatives in Korean: Problems in Grammatical Polysemy and Constructional Relations Copyright © 1994 by Jeong-Woon Park Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Abstract Morphological Causatives in Korean: Problems in Grammatical Polysemy and Constructional Relations by Jeong-Woon Park Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California at Berkeley Professor Charles J. Fillmore, Co-Chair Professor Eve Sweetser, Co-Chair This dissertation is an analysis of the Korean morphological causative con­ struction in comparison with a range of constructions related to it either for­ mally or semantically. In previous work the causative marker (CM) used in the morphological causative has generally been treated as being homonymous with the marker used in the morphological passive, both variously surfacing as i, ki, li, or hi depending on context.
    [Show full text]
  • Package 'Tidytext'
    Package ‘tidytext’ February 19, 2018 Type Package Title Text Mining using 'dplyr', 'ggplot2', and Other Tidy Tools Version 0.1.7 Description Text mining for word processing and sentiment analysis using 'dplyr', 'ggplot2', and other tidy tools. License MIT + file LICENSE LazyData TRUE URL http://github.com/juliasilge/tidytext BugReports http://github.com/juliasilge/tidytext/issues RoxygenNote 6.0.1 Depends R (>= 2.10) Imports rlang, dplyr, stringr, hunspell, broom, Matrix, tokenizers, janeaustenr, purrr (>= 0.1.1), methods, stopwords Suggests readr, tidyr, XML, tm, quanteda, knitr, rmarkdown, ggplot2, reshape2, wordcloud, topicmodels, NLP, scales, gutenbergr, testthat, mallet, stm VignetteBuilder knitr NeedsCompilation no Author Gabriela De Queiroz [ctb], Oliver Keyes [ctb], David Robinson [aut], Julia Silge [aut, cre] Maintainer Julia Silge <[email protected]> Repository CRAN Date/Publication 2018-02-19 19:46:02 UTC 1 2 bind_tf_idf R topics documented: bind_tf_idf . .2 cast_sparse . .3 cast_tdm . .4 corpus_tidiers . .5 dictionary_tidiers . .6 get_sentiments . .6 get_stopwords . .7 lda_tidiers . .8 mallet_tidiers . 10 nma_words . 12 parts_of_speech . 12 sentiments . 13 stm_tidiers . 14 stop_words . 16 tdm_tidiers . 17 tidy.Corpus . 18 tidytext . 19 tidy_triplet . 19 unnest_tokens . 20 Index 22 bind_tf_idf Bind the term frequency and inverse document frequency of a tidy text dataset to the dataset Description Calculate and bind the term frequency and inverse document frequency of a tidy text dataset, along with the product, tf-idf, to
    [Show full text]
  • A Grammar Research Guide for Ngwi Languages
    Language and Culture DigitalResources Documentation and Description 33 A Grammar Research Guide for Ngwi Languages Eric B. Drewry A Grammar Research Guide for Ngwi Languages Eric B. Drewry Azusa Pacific University in cooperation with SIL International—East Asia Group SIL International 2016 SIL Language and Culture Documentation and Description 33 ©2016 SIL International® ISSN 1939-0785 Fair Use Policy Documents published in the Language and Culture Documentation and Description series are intended for scholarly research and educational use. You may make copies of these publications for research or instructional purposes (under fair use guidelines) free of charge and without further permission. Republication or commercial use of a Language and Culture Documentation and Description or the documents contained therein is expressly prohibited without the written consent of the copyright holder. Managing Editor Eric Kindberg Series Editor Lana Martens Content Editor Lynn Frank Copy Editor Sue McQuay Compositor Bonnie Waswick Abstract This grammar research guide describes the range of syntactic variety found in a representative group of well-described Ngwi languages. This overview of syntactic variety should make the guide useful for field linguists preparing to describe any of the forty-eight Ngwi languages that were recognized for the first time in the sixteenth edition of the Ethnologue (Lewis 2009). This is done by giving examples of where and how widely the languages in this group vary even within the typical categories of the Ngwi languages, including sentence introducers, conjunctions, noun types, compounding, derivation, noun particles, postnominal clausal particles, classifiers and numerals, negation, adjectives, pronouns, adverbs, verb types, verb concatenations, preverbal and postverbal slots, verb particles, clause-final and sentence- final particles, simple sentences, compound sentences, and complex sentences.
    [Show full text]